Andy Burnham's speech at Enough is Enough rally 

Go Bernie!

Yes, heard it - brilliant !!! 👍💯✔

Time for Enough is Enough to support tactical voting .

@@johnburrows3385 hopefully we will get proportional representation at some point then tactical voting will not be necessary. Living in a very safe Tory seat as I do it's beyond frustrating

And the WHO, the WEF, the big TECH, and most importantly the B(W) ankers

I don't leader anyone past look 👇

"get real" is a funny name! "we need them" like a hole in the head - you have it entirely the wrong way round, and they have always needed us as voting fodder when they pretend, every few years, that they are any different to the ruling, big T Tories of course they aren't different, or where is the evidence? any bit of evidence, go on!

It's amazing how the media have turned people against their own interests. Many places I've worked the workers have complained about "bloody health and safety". I think, health and safety is reason you have all your limbs and aren't breathing toxic fumes!

How right you are. Same old retoric from Tories always looking out for themselves. We require change and require it now.

Couldn't agree with you more 🤗👍

The Conservatives/Labour and Lib dems are ALL part of the establishment that's been screwing over the working class for decades now. Pro mass immigration, pro EU, pro globalization, pro 'net zero ' All to benefit the super rich and keep the status quo going. NOTHING will much change if you keep voting in the political class.

@David 🤡 🌎 Where in the report did it say there was an official cover up? My guess is you're a hardcore Tory supporter that is frightened by the idea of having a government in charge that is going to benefit the majority, rather than the very rich elites.

@David 🤡 🌎 What's being on the street got anything to do with it? All I asked is you provide the evidence where in the report it said that Andy Burnham was invoolved in a cover up of the grooming gangs but you failed to do that. Instead you deleted your own comment where you said this.

I don't as he defends Grooming Gangs....

Sorry Arthur Scargill wasn’t a good man fleecing hundreds of thousands of pounds off the backs of miners, my family came from a mining village so I was very aware of the the damage he done. It’s inevitable this movement will get hijacked by Unions and infiltrated by every left wing activist who’s got an axe to grind in order further their own cause. I agree we need a new model of governance, but I don’t think the answer is lies with either political party who are equally corrupt, hence the reason why nothing ever changes.

@@Hoax-bp5pq I agree we need to get on the streets. However we need to pry most people away from Netflix, JustEast and Amazon first. Consumerism is a drug that prevents protests.

Jess Philipps and Lisa Nandy are you on drugs Janet ,the last thing we need is these two back stabbers involved in anything, what this pair of two faced cows did to JC was a disgrace.

I don’t recall saying that Arthur Scargill was a good man. What I said was that he was a great social communicator. As a matter of fact, he did not and was never accused of taking anything like £100,000 from anyone. It was also proved that he was wrongly accused of paying off his mortgage out of funds intended for the miners, though he was shown to have wrongly used about £30,000 and was asked to repay it. My point is that well meaning, committed but softly spoken people are not what we need. What we need are real leaders. People prepared to shout and raise hell. It goes without saying that they should believe in what they say and have personal integrity, but having those things in the body of a mouse is less than useless.

According to my grandfather, Scargill was a rabble rouser. He'd turn up, start a riot and disappear off before he was drawn into it. I'll grant, though, he had charisma sufficient to get people to follow him.

Got my vote! 👍

Yes

Listening to Andy Burnham is like a breath of fresh air. He is a born Leader.

Should have been corbyns replacement. Only way starmer will win the next election is if people decide he's the lesser of two evils. Burnham is still guilty of supporting the Iraq invasion but he's the best chance we've got for uniting the country and beating the increasingly harder right

I don't remember Starmer voting the tories into government

That's a bit disingenuous,

There's a lot more than him & certainly a lot more than in the Tory party.

There’s plenty. You just choose not to see them as you look for any excuse to vote Tory.

@@attackpatterndelta8949 I vote Green, I'm far from a Tory. And yes there are undeniably other good Labour politicians, Zarah Sultana for instance, but sadly the face of Labour is Tory with a coat of red paint, two sides of the same coin. Starmer needs to be replaced urgently

@@dominickeane5482 I agree , Labour are just Tory lite with Keir Starmer he's another spineless puppet like Tony Blair

So much so that he knew the Arianna concert was a falseflag and played his part in fooling the worker-bee's, the bee symbol is a symbol of mocking the working people of Manchester.

Atleast quickly.

Violence is not the answer. Two mps have been murdered by extremists over the last five years,they were someone's family too. Mass peaceful campaign is needed but people are tired,fatigued and depressed.

Imo people need to adjust their thinking and be grateful for all we've got, the choices, living standards and freedoms, instead of complaining all the time. 80 years ago, people were huddled together in air raid shelters in appalling conditions, having only what they were wearing, their homes and possessions could just be a pile of rubble when they came out, consider what mattered then. Now we live in a beautiful country, but somehow people have lost track of what matters, if they don't have foreign holidays, a bigger, newer car than their neighbours, a more expensive house than they can afford and a big pay rise every year, they are hard done to, yet none of these make them happier. Instead of behaving like spoilt brats, it needs some introspection and maybe an adjustment to priorities, which might lead to a better life. I know this isn't possible for everyone and support must be provided for the genuinely needy, but beware of those trying to create unrest out of an economic situation for their own political ends, they are very skilful and cunning. As in the war, we need to look out for one another and ensure that limited resources are directed to those in greatest need, ditch the me first mentality and accept that Government can't solve all our problems, accept personal responsibility and we'll get through and maybe be better for the experience, that which doesn't kill us makes us stronger.

@@lawrenceholden5716 What dream world do you live in?Right at this moment we have a police helicopter circling above the neighbourhood for god knows what.This country is going rapidly down the tube.And by the way I was born in 1944 right by the docks in Liverpool.Rationing and slums were the norm.Joined the Norwegian Merchant Navy and later the British Regular Army,so I am talking through a modicum of experience ,not through rose tinted glasses.

@@johnwright7895 Presumably fighting crime and looking after your neighbourhood, it's what they do and get precious little thanks for. Try being grateful for what we've got, things could be a heck of a lot worse.

No. We need each other. It’s not about him. It’s about us demanding a bear minimum standard of living and making the difference ourselves.

Personally, I feel that Andy Burnham is something of a political opportunist. 😏 But it's good that at least some mainstream politicians and MPs have got behind Enough Is Enough.

Because Keir Starmer certainly hasn't!

@@oneoflokis Yes Andy Burnham is a political opportunist and would probably make another mediocre PM.

@@VincentRE79 That is correct. Burnham is a political opportunist.

Yup...Andy is one have the good guys and have course he would of my vote.

It doesn't matter who wins, the people will always be forced into being the worker-bee's while the idle rich get richer, its just a game to them, our lives don't matter to them and never have.

@@Mr.Grimsdale "Both sides same. Source? I made it the fuck up"

@@JP-sm4cs Remain like a rabbit stuck in the headlights of an illusion, until you do your own research thats where you'll stay.

Hed get my vote impotent Starmer....andy talks I listen.....Starmerctalks and people fall asleep. Solidarity.

It doesn't mean that he can't speak for everyone else. He's got a platform and he's using it for good you can't ask more

And? How is that relevant? You don't solve systemic issues by handing-over your personal money, that's called 'Charity' and it's a massively Conservative idea to offload social-responsibility onto the well-meaning. In case you haven't noticed; the mans not a Conservative, he's not pedalling cheap tricks to avoid accountability; he's directly addressing the problems. Everyone can see that this 'he should pay for it, if he cares so much' is nothing but a shallow attempt to bankrupt the people who actually want to make a change?

@@Capybarrrraaaa Oh my God! These people just love people like you. Just like the Labour multi-millionaires telling you where to get help if you're struggling with your bills! What are systemic issues? Here we go. It's cause I'm black, bollocks. Grow up!

Unless he's saying the sanctions on Russia need to stop and they n3ed to seek negotiations then he's just fooling the masses thatching is all about greedy energy companies. Weren't they greedy last year?

Bollocks ,Corbyn put the party back 10 yrs, communist fence sitter, worst leader ever

Probably tell more MPs off for helping strikers.

"Now is not the time....." 🙄

Being utterly useless.

Who cares?

It's the right answer. He shouldn't defend things he doesn't agree with, but don't give the Tory press a "Labour infighting" headline on a plate, either

WELL SAID, MATE. BURNHAM IS AN OPPORTUNIST WHO JUMPS POSITIONS OFTEN.

@@ianwatson5605 Yep! Another member of the political class who, like many other politicians from ALL of the mainstream political parties knows that people are starting to finally wake up to the fact that they've been screwed over for decades now. They know that 'playing it safe' is not going to get them into office. He's seen an opportunity and is grabbing it by saying what the masses want to hear with no real answers to the many difficult and uncomfortable problems facing this nation. Labour/Conservative and the Lib Dems-All ruinous for the working class of this country.

@@ianwatson5605 What examples do you have of that claim?

@@Capybarrrraaaa Burnham abstained on the Tory Governments welfare bill vote in Parliament to enforce more austerity cuts. Mind you , all of the tory lite Labour Party abstained...with the EXCEPTION of Jeremy Corbyn..HE VOTED AGAINST IT.

Starmers not perfect but it will be so much better than the tories

@@Alex-cw3rz I don’t vote for any party cause they are all liars but I’ll say this. I know a good one when I see one. Jeremy was definitely IT. Starmer is a Tory deep inside acting like he is a Labour a man. Unfortunately for him, many are seeing through his scam.

I never said I wanted to die.. iain Duncan Smith said he wanted everyone to be freed from their dependency on life/the state.

@@Alex-cw3rz So you think voting for the lesser of two evils is actually a choice, ALL politicians work for the same boss, Starmer told you what i'm saying is true when he wouldn't define what a woman was.

Corbyn was virtual signalling a communist state, which is way things are going in this country.

Nonce paedo

It's great too see a nonce who defends Grooming Gangs isn't it? He can piss right off the sicko....

absolutely

We needed him to speak out about groomin gangs too. But he didn't. He's an absolute disgrace

No we don’t

@Charva massive make the NHS private I will pay my insurance and might be able to get a dentist appointment that I have waited 3 years for. Government causes the problems and then says they will fix the problem they caused with money that's not theirs it's ours. Labour or tory doesn't matter they are both two cheeks of the same arsehole. The less government rules peoples life the better the peoples lives will be

@Macavity not really-just real Labour

Doubt it.

'If voting made a difference, they wouldn't let us do it' - Mark Twain.

If only he replaced Corbyn instead of starmer

@@boogie4799 😡 If only traitors had not infiltrated the Labour Party . . . Jeremy Corbyn would still be the leader and likely next Prime Minister. But hey, we have Sir (!) Speaking Triplets instead 🥴!

@@boogie4799 He didn't stand in 2020

I don’t get the hate for Starmer. He’s a shrewd politician who recognises that in order to get Labour into office, he has to appeal to moderate Tories and have something to offer them. Labour can’t rely on the Scottish vote anymore, as that goes to the SNP. Starmer knows this. I just wish more Labour voters in England would recognise it too. You can’t enact your policies if you’re not in power.

@@attackpatterndelta8949 The Conservatives obviously don't like him and the Corbyn supporters would rather see a Conservative government than Starmer winning. However, what you read on social media is only written by a tiny percentage of the population. If you look at the voting intention polls you will see a different picture.

Honestly, it's about time that the well-off started paying their way. We need to crank-up taxes for a few years and reclaim our basic-rights.

This would cost high inflation, higher taxation, job loses ,companies relocating, companies going bankrupt.

I have now made a freedom of information request to my local mp for these non-published official reports.

@@hallamrafat2193 Well done.

@@hallamrafat2193 I believe it is over 120000 who have died due to what you speak of above

Didn't you vote for this crisis in 2019

You're right. I'd much rather have trains that I can't afford and never run, as is the present situation. Happy to fork out three and a half grand on utilities a year to companies I have no stake in. So long as we can all go down to our little independent news agent on a Sunday and... wait a minute... where's it gone?

He's still the same Burham, cannot be trusted just like any politician you think of.

@Macavity Yes we did actually, right from Day 1. Furthermore, the concept of a privatised Utility Company is just intrinsically wrong. It was wrong in concept and wrong in practice. New Labour wear just 'old tory' and after 18yrs in the political wilderness they were shit scared of not being in power for another 18yrs, so did everything to appease the 'business sector' including Gordon Brown's promise to the 'City' to 'Govern with a light touch' and what a disaster that proved to be. Then we had PFI which even the tories where unsure about. Clause 4 in the Labour Constitution was abandoned by Neil Kinnock and grasped by the tories to create a 'free for all' ripping the Citizens of the UK off for as much as possible and investing as little as possible. You couldn't have made it up.

TV etc not hearing what fits the narrative they are part of the problem never will take side of the worker. Recently people like Kate Burley, Pierce Morgan, Richard Meadly and a host of other so named journalist treated Mick Lynch disgraceful much too their own detriment. All well sorted when tried to cage Mick. However have to get back to the narrative. They do not want change like the way it is as it suits them very well indeed . Unions return 50 years two generations on with great leaders and reps have to be squashed, not this time 1970s clap trap follows but hey this is 2022 people under 50 not interested back to 70s were not there. Are interested what's happening now 2022 that is what matters. Workers unite together we have power, use it, engage it and fight for change.

Sooner the better hopefully 👌🇬🇧

he is helping keep it covered up ,they will not release the report which will prove him and his labour ilk and the police were all joined at the hip labour for block votes so turned a blind eye the police to not upset community cohesion or there labour mates

Not mutually exclusive.

@@stephenanderson7331 What do you propose as the 'cut off point' for going back in history, in this fashion?

@@stephenanderson7331 That's all I need to know - thanks.