Anupama Chopra's Movie Review of Padmaavat | Ranveer Singh | Deepika Padukone | Shahid Kapoor 

It's ironic that a movie that glorified Rajputs it's very release protested by Rajputs .. I wonder how come Muslims didn't protest

For passing IELTS i am just gonna listen to anupama's reviews☺

Anyone here after Kalank Review?

I think...Reviews r not gonna affect this movie's box office result... Audience will watch it for many different reasons..

More then a year and I still can't get over the fact she gave 3.5 stars to befikre!

i don't care about the reviews. I am watching this for Deepikas hard work and dignity.

Deduct 1* from Befikre and add it to Padmaavat

rajeev gave it 3.5 and anupama 2.5. don't care I am watching it first day first show

Befikre - 3.5* Tiger Zinda Hai and Padmaavat - 2.5* Well done Aunty...

To be Frank....I prefer Sanjay leela bhansali's movies like black and guzaarish over historical dramas..... he can do much more like that instead of clinging to history.....if history is presented...the characters must have more complexities n layers to them rather than being complete black or complete white.....

The biggest understanding required here is the fact that this movie is not about a 21st century women . It is an artist's impression of another artist's poem about a mythical ( or real) Queen . This movie never intended to tell u about the present day women ! From your entire review , what I make is that you went in with 'Wrong' expectations ! And as far as the Jauhar is concerned , it was a tad bit different from sati as sati was a compulsion whereas Jauhar was a choice the ladies made . They considered it 'honourable' to die than to be captured and enslaved by the enemy . It is not something Practical , from the perspective of this century . BUT it had always been a part of our Glorious Indian History . Khilji according to 'most' of our history is considered to have been a barabric ruler . And when this movie happens to be about the Rajput Pride and Valour , it simultaneously demeans the opponent . This is Padmavati's Story . We might not be used to Women centric films but this is a small step on that direction. The ending , if seen through the story teller's vision , was about the women taking up her choice ! Padmavati is a historical legend . PADMAAVAT is a retelling of that story. It doesn't promise to provide 'SOCIAL' changes . Maybe we can leave that to VVC & RKH ?😂 .

I wathced the movie...I am a Rajput..and I LOVED it. Usme aisa kuch bhi nahi hai jiske liye Rani Sa ka shaan pe koi bhi aanch aye. Bhaut hi badhiya thi movie & I thoroughly enjoyed it. I am ashamed of those goondas who are terrorizing people in the name of protecting the honor of Maharani..they are humiliating us all.

I never expected this kind of honesty from you anupama .cant help but appreciate you

"But movies are not paintings!" that is the bottomline for me when it comes to cinema of Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Even paintings need to have a thought and need to say something profound but sadly Bhansali's films are a spectacle lacking substance. Your review sums up beautifully what I feel.

I understand your point, but even if you consider the technical aspects of the movie: cinematography, lighting, shots, costumes, background score, sound mixing and sound editing, the movie is far far better than the typical Bollywood movies some of which you rate as high as 3-3.5 stars. I used to respect your opinion as a true cinephile, but I don't think I will after this one. You can see the number of dislikes on the video to get an idea of what a majority of people think.

The only part I loved about this film is Alauddin Khilji and the beautiful setting and jewelry and costumes...Ranveer is at hos absolute best! well said, Anupama Chopra.. i absolutely agree with you...

Who cares if the film is good or not, i'll give watch the film just to give BJP a middle finger.

2.5 .... seriously....???

Jauhar was committed to save themselves from the brutality of the invaders. As we all know the ladies that remained in the fort after the war were usually used as sex slaves.So rajputs preferred to die with their head held high than become captives. According to local folklore,Khilji couldn't enter the chittorgarh fort so he stopped all the supplies to it. When the soldiers inside were completely devoid of food the opened the gates of the fort and just attacked on the army.Reason being the same,they could accept death during fighting rather than life as a prisoner.This was also the time when the last standing soldiers were giving up their lives on the battlefield the women committed jauhar,leaving behind just a dead fort. Jauhar was not a glorious practice but it was a better option available to them.

Rajeeb Masand: Kaalakaandi 2star Padmavat 3.5 star Anupama Chopra: Kaalakaandi 3star, Padmavat 2.5 star

Ranveer does it again! Few years back he did it in Gunday and now in Padmaavat. Completely overshadows his co-actors by his electric screen presence

Ranveer was undoubtedly star because his role was multidirectional while Deepika and shahid were restricted to 'ideal image' which is reverse of karni sena. They compelled rajpoot image to ideal god like figure while khilji a roaring, ruthless monster. But khilji got advantage of not Endorsed ideal so he did whatever he wants. movie was little streched. Jauhar scene in end was too long. Perhaps trying to establish as goddess. Rajasthan, Delhi and middle East 's qabayal civilization presented perfectly. Some expression of movie were above dialogues.

Only 2 and half stars par phir bhi dekhne to jaaunga hi

Taran adarsh gave this 4.5/5 , Guys just go out and watch it, its just different opinions from everyone, as long as one enjoys it , thats what matters, I personally think this is 4+

I love how Anupama gave respect by naming individuals of the technical team behind the camera while bashing the director and writer.

Bollywood reminds me of Old Hollywood. "Cleopatra" was the most expensive and glamorous film produced at the time, starred Elizabeth Taylor as the beautiful queen of a doomed empire, and was pretty to look at but not much in the way of storytelling. But people are rather illogically praising it as a masterpiece even to this day, because of the impression it created.

This film deserve 4.5 stars. Dp did fabulous job. Each scene and ever scene are outstanding. Therefore it deserves 4.5 stars

Aditi would’ve worked better casted as Padmavati. No offense but kinda tired of seeing Deepika taking the lead roles. It just looks repetitive movie after movie ..

Is Befikrey better than Padmawat then 😜

Anupama Chopra: 2.5/5 Rajeev Masand: 3.5/5

I agree with her review but Shahid was such miscast as a Rajput king and stood out like a sore thumb!

Your review was on point. You pointed out every single that bothered me about the movie.

Bajirao Mastani was really boring too, the over dramatic non sensical ending. Cant expect much from Sanjay other than nice sets. Still will watch when it releases on DVD for the two brilliant actors, Ranveer and Shahid.

This is honestly the best review I've seen of Padmaavat. All the rest left me feeling like it was I that was missing something.....

I didn't see the movie, but I quiet feel that shahid's casting would be a weak link in the film as he seems unconvincing in portraying the character of a Rajput king. The look outs in this movie are Deepika's acting and dance, Ranveer's complex character, grandeur set design, fight sequneces and background score. I hope the story won't disappoint in amidst of the notable positive factors of the movie. Nevertheless, I agree with Anupama's review as I personally feel the movie will lack on story level.

"some scenes become unintentionally comical". @3:00 There, and you could have left it at that. Rather than describe the comical scene after scene.

I KNEW IT.. I JUST KNEW IT !! Ranveer was gonna kill it as KHILJI.. booked my tickets for tomorrow morning !!!

The beautiful use of language by Anupama makes the reviews fun!

Unqualified demonizing of Khilji and his clan 😂😂 What were u expecting madam? Khilji to b shown as a world peace ambassador🙊

ohhhh no just a meagre 2.5/5.0 After all this rollercoaster ride before the release ? tragedy is as tragedy be. Well, it's ok. It may not become a superhit but sure would be a memorable watch for moviegoers.

Don't go by her rating!!! The movie is a magnum opus.SLB's movies are like operas. One should carry that mindset before entering the hall.Padmavaat(i) is A Spectacular Extravaganza with intricate artistic details which very few can dare to attempt to make.The story is simple tone and only three characters-centric.So Khilji has to be the bad man if the other two characters are in love with each other & that has nothing to do with Khilji's "muslim" identity. The Hindu priest, who was expelled from Chittor for his ravenous lust for Padmavati is also a bad man. Anupama did not mention that!So please ignore this oversimplification. Do watch the movie! Ranveer is an awesome talent. And so are Shahid & Deepika. You would find it way better than Befikre.....SLB probably had forgotten to spend few more bucks for these critics to talk good about his flicks believing in his own mettle of filmmaking. It seems YRF does not take that risk and hence the obvious pradelection !!!

Honest channel and reviewer. Always unaffected by big star power or director.Good work👍👍

Hello don't reveal the story.. u don't hv the authority...u r spoiling their half of collection ..Just review it by how u like it.

Public review is the real review...people should stop watching reviews of these critics...😒

Ranveer is so over the top that mainstream critics call acting

2.5 stars??? You r joking right?

With a review as downgraded as this ...u know that it's the high tym to unsubscribe nd stop watching any further video of fc.. ciaos adios

Poor Anupama is always going to see "Befikre" in the comments section. Allow the woman perspective. Disagree, not disrespect.

I'm astounded by this review, is Anupama no longer enamored by Indian cinema anymore? She seems to have missed the beautiful unfolding of a story. Yes there was grandeur, beauty in every scene and why shouldn't there be but there was also symbolism, subtle nuances that if you looked away for a moment you would miss. The acting by all actors was truly incredible, each character had so much depth, passion and intensity which added to the telling of the story. I would give it 4/5 and recommend you to experience this movie on the big screen!

About 2 yrs back ....i happened to watch Her review on tamasha ......nd decided not to go for the movie as it was underrated .....months afterwards i realized that it was a maaterpiece i Missed ........if i had chose not to go for padmaavat after watching ur review yesterday , i would hav regreted it afterwards ....... Guys , this is how underrated films r born ........underratings from overrated critics ....

I think she was sleeping during the moovie so she had given 2.5 star to such a great moovie

You have a very bad habit of giving away a lot of the story and scenes within your reviews. It is absolutely ridiculous for a movie goer to know in advance what the characters do ... More than what has been given in the trailer. Please change this habit and stick to the reviewing part of the story. As of now you have ruined my experience of watching this film

I beg and pray to Bhansali Sir not to touch these controversial topics henceforth.

This movie was a big example of style over substance. The best performance here was done by Jim Sarbh as Malik Kafur but, unsurprisingly, he was ignored most people. Even critics like you. No one seems to talk about it. Such a shame. He is a much better actor than Ranveer, Deepika and Shahid combined.

I saw movie yesterday on 24th and I agree word to word what u said. Ranveer nailed it as Monster Khilji.Apart from all d scene u mentioned I also liked d scene where he give emotional speech to boost his army. Movie is bit slow and it loses its passion and rhythm. It seems v r watching a documentary unless & until u know history. Poor Bhansali feel so sorry for such a creative person who can do miracles on screen but due to restrictions he has to do limitations. I wish he release uncut version of Padmavati online. Cos seeing this movie was like just watching frame by frame photo album. Not as exciting as Ram leela, Bajirao Mastani. Of course to mention Khali Bali & binte dil songs are awesome. Bhansali sir 👍

and no one mentioned about Ranveer's accent. He gave good Maratha vibe in his previous movie. However, he seems to be just mouthing Hindi dialogues here,

Did not like 3D,beautiful costumes,jewelleries and set.But,lots of similarities to Jodhaa Akhbar and Devdas.

i hope someday the original version without any cuts gets to rielesse, that is the real film.

Don't listen to her....it a great movie

Anupama Ji I do not understand how could you give Befikre (3.5 star) , Kaalakaandi (3 star) more star than Padmavati(2.5 star).

Liked this review. Movies always manipulate the truth and are but ofcourse dramatic

I haven't watched the movie but I had an idea how this would turn out to be. Your review is perfect I feel. I wish indian filmmakers knew how to make really good period cinemas with a strong storyline. I am kind of tired to see movies that just have beautiful set but weak storyline.

Padmavati is indeed an entertainer 🙂 Ranveer Singh .... 😍😍

Dear Anupama, I love film companion and most of all I love ur movie reviews. 9 out of 10 times in agree with u and out of all the critics in find the film companion reviews the most honest ....until today. I watched your review of Padmaavat a few times. Yesterday i got the opportunity to watch it in The Netherlands. I must say for the first time a couldn’t understand why u gave the movie just 2,5 stars. I agree that the story was a little bit tin but the screenplay was perfect. There are a few slow moments in the beginning but that is to build up the story. I Bhansali would have made big jumps at once instead of just slowly build story most of the critics would have given him less than 3 stars. The movie is 2,5 hours long but for this story to work in was necessary. I didn’t get bored a bit and in the end of the movie people started clapping 👏🏼. U always give more stars to smaller more serious movies who are less entertaining. I watch all of them. But entertainment that is also what the Indian film industry is all about. So maybe u could have been less harsh on Padmaavat . Love ur work and film companion Sherien

After watching padmavati trailer always felt it's lacking soul inspite of all the grandeur. Nothing compared to Bajirao Mastani.

Sounds like a typical SLB film. Beautiful to look at, but no soul.

Yet, she gave Befikre 3.5 stars

Madam.. there were many spoilers shared in the name of review.. please refrain to do so, thanks

This Film is full of RANVEER SINGH ❤️

Sanjay Leels Bhansali is a very good set maker but as a director he sucks a big one.

Movies are not meant only to be hyper realistic..they can be dramatized too..a story which is known to all.. moreover a lesson in school books.. what else bhansali could do to it for making it more interesting ? A little more drama and colourful visuals...he did it..I can't get through your sophisticated language but..movie is exceptionally good..no need to criticize about the content as it is true and happened ages ago which can't be altered for satisfying review writers...a must watch for any movie lover..

A little heads up for spoilers would have been nice!

a surprisingly good review ! Loved Jim Sarbh the most, although some scenes were outlandish

Shahid as Rajput king was outstanding in my opinion.

You just had a Befikre moment but in a negative way. Well the film definitely deserves a 3+*

The most honest review..... Padmavat isn't a Masterpiece like some people are believing it to be.

Anupama Ji.... Just retire and stop reviewing films. Just go and watch you favorite (mediocre) film Befikre for the remainder of your life and leave artistic masterpieces like Padmaavat alone.

Anupama should shut down her negative critic's shop

Where was 'this' Anupama when Befikre was released?

I feel that this movie is a masterpiece. I don't have anything to do with the history and the other things. I don't care about them. I just saw a wonderfully beautiful movie which made my heart ache. I love it.

This is the first time that moviegoers will faithfully follow review of a film before going to watch it. Reason? B'coz it neither have any 'Bhai' (who refused to do the film) nor it have any 'positive' buzz from media! All the media channels are injecting 'KS virus' in the minds of ppl for TRPs! Such a Shame!!!!

Kindly keep the standard and rating consistent.

Nice review. It's true that SLB lacks storytelling, especially since Bajirao Mastani

I dont know why people are trolling Anupama. It was her choice to give befikre 3.5. When Anurag Kashyap's No Smoking released Many critics like Rajeev Masand gave 1/5. But now No smoking is considered as masterpeice. I have never found any trolls on Rajeev Masand reviews.

there are no cheerful moment for audience.poor fight.no energetic looks for Shahid as rajput.pale ,sleepy,deglamourised looks.the whole framework looks faddy,no depth of field to explore art direction,only characters in focus rest are blurred.poor fight sequence .no strategical plans.khiljis want for woman portrayed lustful but ratan Singh betrayal to his first wife is romance.battle in Rann runs in dusty stroms of strome.(imaginary).at last 2 kings can't even fight like warrior.no martial arts.child like sword fight. The jauhar seen takes 20 minutes headache.charcoal stones pelted for what.if to suicide in a closed room.big mob of woman prefer to die for single man.rajput woman should be seen as warriors and at later time when everything around them was unfavorable.thats the moment to suicide.

Its sad that u r such a biased fan of ranveer that u didnt talk much of shahid or deepika

What ever the review says, it doesnt matter as everyone has their own opnion but still excited to see the movie.

Mirch Masala was one damn brilliant movie too 👍

She said 2 1/2 i think this movie deserves more than that

Striking tableu IS the best way to describe the emotions of every character that was a part of this film. Including Khilj, I mean even he starts to gaze into thin air talking about how he doesn't get true happiness. What is that? I remember watching Devdas, which was a very grand version of what the original was and it got its due flak for it, but the world SLB created with SRK and the rest of the cast who were committed in expressing their love, hate, anger and ego is world apart from what he has consistently created in the past 3 years.

Paid review

I respect your opinion but it seems like most of the time you end up liking the film which audience doesnt like and vice-versa... It deservers more that 2.5 start if feel ...

I was extremely disappointed after hearing your review of shudh desi romance you gave it 4 stars when the movie lacked in every aspect. I think this will be the second one.

first Anna Vetticad, then Raja Sen, next rajiv Masand and now Anupama "befikre" chopra slates the movie.... wow!

2.5 * for Ranveer’s movie, come on Anupama it must surely be better than Befikre 😂😂😜😜

She even found writing flaws in interstellar but not with befikre

She said all good about the movie and giving 2.5 ??? R u kidding madam ?? Reviewers from south have 3.5 to 4. Simply giving 2.5 ? Just compare your previous movies with Padmavat for which you gave above 3 or 3.5.

Anupama, you definitely got it wrong. 2.5 stars? this movie should certainly have got a 4 star rating, but then again, you are the film critic, or are you? I expected you to be fair.

2.5 stars is so not what it should be. This film is definitely 4.5-5/5 stars. This woman should not be qualified to review films. Disgusting review. This film is very under appreciated

She likes movie like Befikre. From this you can evaluate her sensibilities!!!