Apollo 1 Fire. Real horrifying footages, audio and photos 

🤔

those guy's were true pioneers... heroes

Who is lest and why do people forget him?

Yea they cover that in the first minute

@@SaturnCrazy1987 the persons name is ed white, where did the name lest come from?

@@SaturnCrazy1987I burst out laughing

Dude we didnt, it was proven to be all fake. How can some People be this gullible?

@@markxv2267 😂 You almost had me 🎣

I cannot say we did and cannot say we didn't and remain 'open-minded' but please consider this, as if you were on a court case jury where all you have to have is 'a reasonable doubt": Considering the time frame between this Jan 1967 disaster and the Oct 1968 'Apollo 7' mission and whether this truly allowed them to fully redesign, check, test and manufacturer everything (considering the stories behind Grissom's complaints and saying he was going to tell the press about the poor construction standards of the programme they would have had to end contracts and start new contract and new R&D, etc), then considering the films Capricorn One and then Kubrick's 'possible' hints in 'The Shining' - I actually have, what for me is a 'reasonable' doubt. Nothing has yet can shift those 'doubts' and for me they remain 'reasonable' Others may scoff but, all the defence counsel in a trial only needs the said 'reasonable doubt' to make his case whereas those saying that something DID happen, have to prove it 'beyond all reasonable doubt'. For me, simply point the Hubble telescope at the moon, show the remaining parts of the LEM craft still there and this would remove MY, personal; doubts. SO I hope they did, but, nonetheless, and irrespective of my 'conspiracy theory' nature I respect and observe that there are many truly brave people around and re this video it is sad that they were exposed to lack of design and basic scientific thought re oxygen and a spark which we were all taught in school ansd which is not and was not 'rocket science'.

@@Jules-4367 wait what - you looked for evidence in 2 of many fictional films that a particular director made and that gives you "reasonable doubt"? If you ever get called for jury service please decline on the grounds of insufficient ability

@@bestbehave 🤔 I wasn't sure from your obviously-considered and well-constructed reply whether or not to respond and enter into a battle of wits with you, as my parents always said I shouldn't attack an unarmed man, but let's go for it! I didn't solely base my doubt on fictional films as they are purely circumstantial evidence and can be argued as pure fiction or, alternatively, a way to alert people that there may have been an alternative reality. No, I based my reasonable dooubts on things such as (as in my orignal reply but perhaps you missed it) I personally don't believe they could have re-designed and resolved all issues in the time between Apollo 1 disaster and Apollo 7 launch). However, assuming they did, the next reasonable doubt arises when you consider that with all the nay-sayers, "Buzz" Aldrin (a god-fearing man) was asked time and time again to simply place his hand on a bible and state that "I walked on the moon" and he refused EVERY time and never once would do it. People said it would give them peace and strength for him to simply affrim on the bible and as a man with faith, helping others and giving them peace should have been one of his main principles- but he continaully refused. For me there are two primary options - he didn't want to reassure people and give them peace and strength - or he couldn't make the simple statement with his hand on a bible. Therein, for me, lies a reasonable doubt. Yes, the moon landing divides opinion and it is a little bit akin to having faith and being atheist. Those with faith and believe that there is an almighty being somewhere and life ever after, often mock and verbally dismiss anyone who doesn't beileve the way THEY think. Yet all the non-believers say is 'show me your proof and i will change my opinion!" and yet the believers cannot and it transpires it is simply their 'belief'! So I have my doubts and to prove me wong (without some smart reply), just show me your concrete and unquestionable evidence and, if you cannot, then you have not proven your case and I retain a reasonable doubt! Oh, regarding being on a Jury, I have done it three times and on one of those was actually commended by the judge for the astuteness of questions passed top him during the case! So, over to you, convince me to think otherwise or, perhaps you have nothing with which you can🤔

Yeah, ghoulish isn't it😐

Actually, they didn't burn up. Their suits protected them like they were supposed to. Unfortunately, the fire burned up all the oxygen and they asphyxiated.

@@Ursicus-td8zt Well, that's a relief.

​@@Ursicus-td8zt that's a terrible lie

@@horrorsponge, it actually isn't. Even though in some instances those three crew members were burned over half of their bodies, they died from cardiac arrest, due to asphyxiation. Don't tell someone that's a terrible lie, when that's what the investigation showed.

Pareidolia. The suits were empty.

.

​​@@DuolingoWrath Hey I saw you on the other vídeo the one of the russian woman

​@@waspanimations7037nah I heard his face was burned onto the inside of the helmet, making it look like he was still there,

That's Gus Grissom. The third picture.

😢

mam you are so old

Yeah Wes I was nine years old too. A voice came on the TV and said, "We interrupt this program to bring you a special report" It was shocking and sad but still a good time to be a kid. And yes we are getting old but that's what happens if you live long enough! And theres an old saying that goes, The older the violin the sweeter the music. It's sad that these three astronauts didn't live to get old

I was also 9 & remember it too!!

yes but you are so young and klaus schwab wants to put a chip in your brain

thank you Cpt Obvious

@@slowery43self your kill read it backwards

​@@KrisRees-fs9mirude☹

and a completely riddled compartment of Oxygen only. Let’s say they were able to get out of there, the outside pressure would have had to be the same with the inside in order to get out. So even if the door hatch was a terrible design choice, they were at their doom even after strapping themselves in.

@CornyVR. U r probably right about that.An oversight I'm sure was addressed during the investigation.A damn shame.

There are many failures in scientific research that cost terrible suffering and human lives... Soon I will continue to publish more interesting cases

It happened because of very flammable material’s in the cockpit. And they chose a single gas environment instead of a double gas environment.

A spark in a 100% pure oxygen cabin + a dooor that’s really hard to get open

A spark, a bunch of velcro, a leaky coolant pipe, a 100% oxygen environment at 2 psi over the outer atmospheric pressure, and a plug style cabin door that couldn’t be opened until the cabin pressure was equalized with said outside atmosphere. 2 psi over atmospheric pressure doesn’t sound like much, but once the fire broke out, it spread incredibly quickly, and the heat caused the pressure in the cabin to increase from around 17 psi to almost 30. The vents inside the cabin weren’t able to reduce the pressure quickly enough to allow the crew to open the door before parts of their suits had melted and they were exposed to the carbon monoxide fumes from the fire and asphyxiated.

@@redrodtherebel6630 thanks for the detailed answer. Have you heard that a similar situation happened a little earlier in the USSR?

The suit was empty

@@waterflye7760 You can see it bro on the right suit

It was most likely the hot glass had burned the face and it got imprinted on

Pusspuss

It was 1986, and they were using a radio, the radio was also said to have glitched many times. Of course it’s going to sound like a lot of static.

It was 1967 and the last thing the astronauts said before everything went into flames was how are we going to go to the moon and we cant even talk between two buildings

CIA killed your cousin, dude.

It was murder. The astronauts were outspoken about the failures of the apollo program.

@@EddyOfTheMaelstromwe know

There is some moron that says everything is fake on every video. Congrats on you being the one here to accomplish that.

Because it's engagement farming

Whatever, you'll be fine.....

It's fucking real omg🗿

Gus Grissom 😉

he would have, neil armstrong was a replacement

Soviets?

You’re very ignorant. Believe what you want to believe but the rest of us sane people know the truth. Don’t speak of things you don’t know. How disrespectful.

man you are so old

nobody cares how old you may have been... this is not all about you

you are a slow thinker@@slowery43

@@slowery43 - I care about his story!

@@slowery43I also care about his story

It’s a Text To Speech voice.

The crew members were using the time to run through their checklist again, when a momentary increase in AC Bus 2 voltage occurred. Nine seconds later (at 6:31:04.7), one of the astronauts (some listeners and laboratory analysis indicate Grissom) exclaimed "Hey!", "Fire!",: 5-8  or "Flame!"; this was followed by two seconds of scuffling sounds through Grissom's open microphone. This was immediately followed at 6:31:06.2 (23:31:06.2 GMT) by someone (believed by most listeners, and supported by laboratory analysis, to be Chaffee) saying, "[I've, or We've] got a fire in the cockpit." After 6.8 seconds of silence, a second, badly garbled transmission was heard by various listeners (who believed this transmission was made by Chaffee: 5-9 ) as: "They're fighting a bad fire-Let's get out ... Open 'er up", "We've got a bad fire-Let's get out ... We're burning up", or "I'm reporting a bad fire ... I'm getting out ..." The transmission lasted 5.0 seconds and ended with a cry of pain.

what??

There was probably a better way to phrase that

@@waspanimations7037 There must have been a conversation that took place before they died "accidentally". Instead of so short an imaginary quote, how about this? Jim Webb looked glum. The head of NASA took a deep breath and called order. It was an informal meeting with the astronauts. The usual Germans were there, too. And a few suits nobody had ever seen. Without introducing himself, the head suit spoke up. "Men, we have some news." And he began to explain that we aren't going to be able to make the Moon shot work. But we have to beat the Russians. The world is at stake. We have a plan. You guys will just take the ship to orbit and the rest we will fake. Nobody knew what to say. Von Braun looked down. Gus spoke up, "I think I can speak for all of us, we won't do this." "Gus, I am really sorry to hear you say that." said the suit. Then he smiled and said, "Think about. We need you guys in this. It is your patriot duty."

Why mountain rescue teams still use radio… exactly

@@tubecated_development no. That doesn't explain shit. We never went to the Moon

@@SuperLockguy you’re not the brightest are you… “How are we going to get to the moon if ( cell phone service )”. 🤦🤡

It's a text to voice app

Can’t get to space without flames

Not quite - oxygen does not burn on its own - it just intensifies the fire when something else ignites.

Oxygen is not flammable. It is an oxidizer. Other materials can burn (ie, "oxidize") in it, but O2 by itself is not flammable

if you’re Amish, why are you using this technology?

.. I'm far from Amish?

Bruh it was technical issues they didn't mock god stop using religion in science they don't work together

Pure oxygen will not kill you if you breath it. Not true at all. I have administered pure oxygen many times

No, pure O2 will not kill you.

@@ChristLink-Channel you are absolutely correct. We give it in the hospital all the time

@@ChristLink-Channel try it. Have you ever hyper ventilated and pass out

@@amybradley5821 I had 100 percent o2 for 30 minutes to counter a migrane! It helped a lot!

They did, they had the Gemini missions before Apollo

Was that really a "LOL" moment for you? Wtf

What exactly would they be testing?

​@@willoughbykrenzteinburgcrew safety maybe?

They did afterward. They did multiple unmanned tests of the Saturn launch vehicles before a manned flight on Apollo 7. In January '67 NASA was feeling a bit cocky after the massively successful Mercury and Gemini programs and, with less than three years to land on the moon, were starting to cut corners in the name of speed. This tragedy was a grim reminder of the price of hubris. Quality and safety were no longer taken for granted - until 1986.

Lol

@@nainon4016🤖

@@thankthemosthighgod9135 funny how you question everything we are told expect your own religion that

@@nainon4016 who said I was religious

@@thankthemosthighgod9135 beliving in God ( a creator) is a some kind of religion

BS!

@@billythekid3234 Yep, some will say that but, equally, Virgil Grissom was causing Apollo management sleepless nights with his threats to go to the press about the poor standards he was experiencing. So I can understand that some would say Chaffey and White were 'collateral' damage. There is no proof and hence 'consopiracy theories' abound but, one day, one of these conspiracy theories (whereever) may have more truth than BS?

Yeah nice conspiracy. Cause three casualties and make your own organization look sloppy, you actually think this?

He never added distortion to the audio literally sounds like that.

Your just a 9 year old

@@amandasimpson8854 *You're...

Hell of a comeback ​@@airportbum5402

Bruh huh? This has nothing to do with the disaster. '-'

They did. Before they left the moon, they left a token to commerotae the sacrifice of the Apollo 1 astronauts on the surface of the moon.

Ok and?

@@dallo9016 Shut up.

This is a pointless comment and please separate science from religion

@@marialourainebanosia26 Then why reply? Stfu

Do we need to hide such disasters?

@@thrashscience Who suggested hiding it? I recall when it happened - it was being reported on national TV almost immediately (less than 30 minutes) after it happened.

​@@executivesteps I understand that's triggering to have to re-live, but I'm not as old as you and haven't heard it

To try and avoid the suffering of these brave brave men is to inadvertently belittle the ultimate sacrifice they made to the cause of furthering the space program. May they all rest in peace.

@@neilmcguinness4422 “Avoiding their suffering, belittling their sacrifice”? What on earth are you thinking. How about publicizing their autopsy photos? Look up the image of Russian generals staring at the charred biomass of cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov. Is that what you think is appropriate to honor their sacrifice.