Apollo 14 in 24fps: Landing, Moonwalk & Liftoff 

how crazy is that?

Thanks for reminding how time can change life for good.

💯

He would have been about 15.

@@aemrt5745 My grandmother was born in 1888. She used to say that the hilight of her life was the invention of the movies and Charlie Chaplin in particular. The low point was losing two of her four brothers in WW1. She acknowledged the technical advances that you mention but they were generally too far removed from her everyday life to be very relevant.

"You seen one Earth, you seen 'em all!" -- Jack Schmitt, Apollo 17

​@@EriPages Lunar landings were replicated five more times; and the first attempt was very nearly a failure. Also, there were four manned test missions prior to the Apollo 11 landing and many more unmanned ones. You have no idea what you're talking about.

@@EriPages indeed this happened in 1971

@@EriPages I don't even wanna waste my time trying to explain you some basic science... plus I will never never never believe you or whoever's gonna tell the moon landings are fake, you can tell whatever you want, I know the truth, you don't

@@EriPages You're talking in riddles. There's no such word as"REALER". Go away and educate yourself.

@Juicewrld999 Of course it is - there is no atmosphere and thus no wind up there to make it flutter. There is a horizontal rod attached to the flag pole to make the flag look good instead of just hanging downwards, but the flag is only moving when the astronauts are putting it up or when they touch it, as they move closely by it - and for some time afterwards, since there is no atmosphere there to dampen its oscillations, only inner friction in the pole + rod + flag system.

@Juicewrld999 Actually it wasn't - and it was probably blown over during take off by the high velocity exhaust gasses from the ascent module in the A11 case. No it wasn't just 5 ft away, but more like 15 - 20 or so. Anyway the two astronauts had a bit of trouble putting the flag pole up, because it turned out that the lunar soil was pretty hard beneath the thick layer of lunar dust, which of course didn't help either. So on (some of?) the later Apollo missions they would instead put up the flagpole a good bit further away from the LM, and secure the flag pole much better by drilling a hole for it in the hard lunar soil. And these later flag poles with the US flag flying from them still seem to be standing after all these years ( you can see their shadows ), when you look at the "close up" photos ( from a height of 20 - 25 km ) that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LOR) that were taken of all 6 Apollo landing sites, when NASA shortly sent the LOR into a more elliptical orbit that allowed it to pass directly over them at relatively low altitudes.

@Bjowolf2 don't waste your brain on these retards. They have no life or purpose. They have to keep themselves busy by questioning the evidence of man's accomplishments and facts. Just ignore them.

@@JamieCrew Yes, you are right, but it's easy to get caught up in their web of ignorance and their lack of curiousity and ability to think for themselves 😉 Thank you 😊

@Juicewrld999 The lander is 31 feet wide (leg to leg). To be 5 feet away from the engine you'd have to be under it.

Maybe Artemis in 2025...

Now it will be much more of a cake walk. Since our last visits to the big space rock, we've sent probes and impacters to verious hard to reach places of the solar system. only issue is getting a safe enough system and suit to do the job with a larger margin of safety this time. We only have our own corperations to beat now.

Speaking of budgets, Arthur C Clark once said that everything you saw in the movie 2001 A Space Odessy could have been developed for the cost of the vietnam war

China is trying to land humans on the moon by 2030 and on mars by 2033 is what I've been hearing. There's still a race with foreign powers.@@dollin9515

we will never go back, shits fake asf

Wonder. Even if you died there, you're doing something that only a handful of people have done. Even if you die, you're dying in the midst badass way.

@@-Subtle- That’s totally true up until a point. Every diver that died diving was a hero until diving became common place. Every aviator that died flying made headlines until flying became common. The fear of being forgotten far outweighs the simple fear of death

​@@MyLinguine No one remains remembered for eternity, but what matters is how are you different from the society.

hoax

@@mandrill173 Idiot.

That's gravity for you.

Keep in mind that the total mass of the Apollo at Canaveral liftoff was 6,200,000 pounds, while the lunar ascender weighed less than 11,000 pounds. That was the biggest difference.

Cgi studio shit 😂😂😂

@@rukawacloudstrife2114 Flat head bastard 💀

@@rukawacloudstrife2114 U dumb for real, man, CGI was primitive as hell up until the 80's when the industry finally started to hammer in and use it for entertainment and research

Or maybe they were forced to tell a lie

@@philippfinalizer Reaching like all moon landing deniers

@@philippfinalizerhow dumb do you have to be…

@@GIJames I'm not convinced either way

The depression was living a lie the rest of their life with a gun pointed at them 24/7. Just look at the interview of buzz and niel afterwards.

😂😂😂

fake af

So fake. As an engineer, the tech they had in the 60s wasnt anywhere close to landing on the moom and Taking back off, without any errors, on the first try...

@@toaster3822 I'll also point out that the earth is flat, which falsifies the moon landing on its own.

@@toaster3822 the first try? Are you aware of how many Apollo missions there were? Also, the Russians were watching this from both the inside and outside. If it was a fake, why didn’t they say anything? They would’ve known. There was a huge issue of prestige at play and they acknowledged the achievement.

@@VolkerThimm the 10fps progressive scan valve based video cameras used for live broadcast.

@@jon_collins Not "valve" or vacuum tube based, except for the Epicon tube , which was a cross between a CRT and a silicon diode image matrix

There is tv footage from Apollo 17 EVA, many hours actually, that doesn't look too bad. Most people only seen the horrible (quality) one from Apollo 11. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vBSzlMjpBuM.html for example. I heard that 11's EVA tv was filmed of a monitor in the tracking station and then send to the US for tv. It certainly looks like that in original recordings.

Funny how only the technology for the moon was better in 1969 than it is in 2021.

@Andre I know, its a joke, just like everything the government is telling us. They lied saying meat and butter and eggs were bad, now were finding out they're opposite.

If that makes people happy, who are we to judge. Rather, we should be happy that there is also content for us out there.

the moon aint the kind kind of place to raise your kids. in fact its cold as hell, and then hot as hell, or something.

@@furadice973 Stand in the middle like a rotisserie chicken

@@furadice973 the song was about Mars, not the moon.

@@Nick-wn1xw Little boy blue and the man on mars.

Easiest argument against the non-believers I've ever seen comes from Buzz Aldrin: "If you can disprove the math, you can disprove the landing"

@@dakunism how the f is simulated math any proof for u are u actually retarded or what??

Why hasn't this video been shown before?

@@dakunismmath, hmmmm. 1x1 is ? You see, easy

Underrated comment

this is so good dud

LOL 😂

Lmfao

I hate when people tell me to smile right before a photo - that just feels _unnatural._ I prefer when they take spontaneous photos of random cheerful moments instead.

Thinks it’s coined at NASA “the right stuff”. Brilliant.

7min though out🤔 tHE LINES THAT R HOLDN da ASStronauts UP🤪 VERY VISUAL 9:27🤬.... FAKEM👀N LANDn4$ho

@@edellis2960 Mwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

@@edellis2960 you're stupid af

@@edellis2960 ya seriously you're a piece of shit, it would've been harder to fake the moon landing in 1969 than to just do it, and the astronauts left retroreflectors on the moon that are visible by telescope

I can’t believe they’re not giggling and cheering the whole Time I wouldn’t be professional enough for this at all

YES IMAGINE, BUT IT WAS A HOAX

@@tedcruzforgayrights2045 Why would you need to be professional? Professional for what? You’d assume these people would show more emotion, it’s weird.

@@TripsX it’s most likely because they’re on a very strict time limit, they have a list of goals to take care of and in brand new territory like this you’d want to stay focused to the mission Anything could happen Also this is just a snippet They spent a whole 21 hours on the moon, which I didn’t know until making this comment, so they probably had their moment at some point

​@@TripsXSeriously? You can't see why it would be needed to be professional?

And which footage, exactly, do you think was taken by this mystery "camera man"?

@@Tim22222 the moon footage, the one that is on the video

@@nugs2727 it was one of the astronauts who had gotten out first, set up the camera, and recorded the second one getting out.

@@archierush868 No the cameraman waited for them to arrive

@@nugs2727which is more likely: NASA sending another astronaut without telling anyone to already land on the moon but not have his Lunar Lander within view of the descent of the actual lander and only be there to record them getting out. Or one of them got out first, set up a camera, and record the other getting out.

@yony artworks what does this mean? I think it's polish... jinkuyye (thank you) lol

Greta Thunberg - How dare you!

@Greta Thunberg Yes, and Earth is flat, and it was created six thousand years ago by the one and only sky lord.

@Greta Thunberg Ahh yes, the be all and end all of solid evidence. A fucking RU-vid video, made for numpties like you to lap up because you're too desperately thick to be able to tell.

@Greta Thunberg I just went to the video in your link and "thumbs downed". I suggest everyone else do the same.

yea!

Yet still the fake moon landing morons will be out in force.

9:56

😂

We can’t and have never went to space, this is fraudulent

lucky you if just scrubbing it gets you positive comments...

I left a non positive comment on a similar M landing post and the next time I tried to post one I was banned , they are very sharp at keeping it positive

@@Alanoffer and keeping out the ignorant

its called control@@Alanoffer

Same ones scrubbing all the facts. You need to really dig to find the truth now. This footage is truly unbelievable!! ;) Literally!

hoax

How to say you are scientifically illiterate without saying you are scientifically illiterate@@mandrill173

​@@mandrill173prove it ret@rd

FAKE ASF

​@mandrill173 You are proof that Crack babies can make it to adulthood. Albeit with a bit of brain damage.

J Calhoun education for those morons is like red cape to a bull

@J Calhoun 🤣 enjoy

@@nikola.trafojer if you claim to know anything about physics... why are you mixing up mass and weight? Pssshhhhh....

@@nikola.trafojer Tbh thats not really the odd part. Jumping your vehicle into the 'air' and then activating thrust to escape the gravity isnt all that hard to do, hell you could do the same with fireworks on Earth, just throw it in the air right before lift off.

Moon escape velocity is 2.4 km/s. not sure that required effort is small.

Let's see the hoaxtards try and explain that.

Michael Clentworth i mean if I was a director making a movie about people going on the moon but shot in a studio, I would take in consideration the communication delay

@@fantin298 ya, these pseudo science moon landing must be stopped lol. they're even making fun of smart anti moon landing ew

OH NO! MY FOOT TRANSFORMED INTO A FOOT, WITH YOUR ASS WRAPED AROUND IT! Rly, go back 2 4chan

Actually, I have longer delays than this using my cell phone calling my friends in The Rockies in 2021. ;-)

Thats very cool

Woah lucky i wish

@@jr9710 oh, so I guess all of the billions of other people who have an IQ above room temperature are also lying? That hundreds of years ago people like Galileo figure out the planet was round, hundreds of years later apparently it is flat again? Or at least to the small amount of people who apparently “know the truth”

@@quantumpotential7639 please shut up

But you had no clue it was only going to circle at lower Earth orbit and come right back. Then we were shown this footage from a Hollywood studio.

Fake. Because NASA lied. USA lied . They all lied .......they never went !

@@Motleymick lying works only for things that cannot be objectively proven, like God, or Santa Claus. Apollo can be proven thus, so lying won't work. Sorry.

@@thewildcellist Just because they made the Apollo does not prove it landed on the moon then flew back to earth. 230,000 miles each way on a single tank of fuel. Sorry not sorry.

@@Motleymick "a single tank of fuel?" Yikes. Space isn't called "space" for nothing. As astronaut Bill Anders put it while enroute to the Moon on Apollo 8, “...Isaac Newton is doing most of the driving now.” Once a spacecraft has momentum, there're no impediments (like atmosphere) to stop it or slow it down, so it takes less fuel than you might think to travel those 230+ thousand miles.

You've been watching too much Star Trek.

Im glad there’s someone here that can watch the footage and not make up things. Theres too many people that can’t accept the fact that humans are more advanced than we really are. I’ve made points where people claim it’s fake and i point out that Russian or Chinese satellites orbiting the moon have taken pictures of the landing site and have seen the lunar lander. That’s undeniable proof right there. 3 independent space agencies that have loose ties with each other, all seeing the same thing on the moon that one of them left behind. Feel free to use this an example for any other people saying the moon landing is fake.

No human has never been on the moon. Thats all holywood crap made by Stanley Cubrick, as he admitted much later in the film Shining.

А что у них над рюкзаками отсвечивает при определенных ракурсах?

@@mariepiThere is no stars because the Moon is so bright, if you look up at the nightsky and look for the moon you can see how bright it is yet how dark it is in this Video, that's because they have to turn down the sensitivity of the Camera for it to not look like a white blinding mess.

@@mariepi Im tired of people like you. Stars are not visible cause the camera is recording a really bright surface, and the exposures time was fast, stars are dim, not giving the camera enough light to show up in the photos.

@@ok.6539 What an ignorant reply. It's quite possible the person has no knowledge of this, or could be a young person.

@@kevza1978 Maybe they should learn to educate themselves before implying it's fake then. Young people more than anyone should know how easily you can get information with a 2 second google search.

@@TwitchCronos100 he only said there was no stars and now we've educated him as to why there was no need for everyone to jump down his throat

you had me at first lmao well done

This comment is made hundreds of times on every single moon video. Plagiarism at its finest

@@KnoxxJerz exactly

As one who lived through this period, I don’t find it funny at all…despite Kubrick being one of my favorite film makers.

Cool story bro

I was in High School / Jr. High during the apollo missions and yes... it was and is still exciting to me. Can't wait for the Artemis missions... Ad Astra!

you guys been fooled big time@@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke

Yeah I was a little worried they were gonna run out of fuel on decent. Maybe we can hear the nerves in their voices.

@@TheOneNashon how?

I get that way every time I watch Apollo 13 the movie.

It’s fake

@@rawnuklesWell that wouldn’t happen because the place they filmed it they had a fuel station near by, Hollywood always comes prepared bro !

I agree, this thing is majestic

Yep. The masses of ignorant people in the world including Moon landing denying cultist, flat earthers, and other fringe conspiracy theorists: ​A group of people who very likely suffer from an array of psychological issues; chief among which is Identity-Protective Cognition. There are certain markers that preclude those who fall for cult’s schemes and tactics for example. These markers overlap when dealing with conspiracy theorists and those that deny facts due to their feelings. Often times it deals with not feeling special or chronic low self esteem/insecurities mixed with deep-seated trust issues, likely brought on by trauma, and an insatiable need to feel important; what would make someone feel more important than thinking they know better than most of the people on Earth and all of the scientific community. It’s a desperate ploy and vicious cycle of needing to feel important and a sense they belong.

​@@DemonDrummerprojecting much?

@@trendynow1369 Nope, but way to ironically/hypocritically project in your comment accusing me of doing just that. Remember, you’re the one that believes unfounded nonsense and unproven speculative subjective conjecture based on nothing but ignorance, feelings, and fallacious logic. Let that sink in. 🤗 Do better, learn.

@@DemonDrummer Here's how to prove this was fake: 1. Change your video to .25 speed, the slowest speed on the RU-vid settings. 2. Go to the part where they take off, start about 9:57. 3. Watch the footprints closely as they withstand what makes the flag violently move.

нас в школе учили что тень на Луне абсолютно черная в виду отсутствия атмосферы и в тени ничего не видно. То что мы видим что то в тени на Земле, это свойства воздуха.

А ещё они оставили там медали в честь первых людей в космосе, таких как Гагарин несмотря на то что тогда была холодная война в разгаре. Очень хороший жест.

​@@bobododoo3925 просто качество обучения в вашей школе плохое. Поэтому вы глупый выросли😊

@@Healton это как посмотреть. В вакууме тень должна быть контрастной, однородной. А атмосферы на луне нет.

We wouldn’t have gotten there without you ruskies

Look again ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JhvHoWCRuN0.html it looks funny

Don't be so gullible.

@@DoubleoP Wow, you waited a year to post that inane comment.

@@smeeself wow, you're so clever. 😀

@Paul Nope. Just not a conspiracy nutter. ( so... I suppose, relatively, probably. )

9:59 #leaves on the moon.

@@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204 That's rocks you smooth brain

No humans went to mokn with that shitty technology lol the only spaceship wich will be able to sent people to moon and mars will be the starship of spacex.. Stop believing this fake story.. It wasnt nasa fault though goverment forced them to lie about this moon landing

@@ArjanTV the fuck kind of Olympic gold medal getting, world record-setting mental gymnastics has you convinced that only SpaceX will succeed in getting us to Moon and Mars, but NASA has faked the moon landing?

@@CommentCritic ikr like if elon was listing to this dude he'd slap the shit back into his ass and out his throat he'd be that pissed off imagine spending ur whole life as a astronaut and go to the moon witch is an amazing feat of ingenuity

Weak sauce. You're just making excuses.

Ok, how does an ascent engine with 3,500 pounds of thrust lift off from the "moon" and not disturb the surface directly underneath it?@@Tim22222

⁠​⁠​⁠@@chriscurtis1578the ascent module fires the engine onto the decent module and not the ground. That’s why the ground isn’t too disturbed from exhaust but things like the flag are. The dust and regolith does get thrown around a bit but it’s only for a few seconds and the ascent module doesn’t have that much power when compared to the main engines of other rockets. You can use weaker engines here because of the weaker gravity, which is why the engine of the lunar ascent module can lift it even thought on earth, it cant.

The photos in this video can all be viewed in the NASA archives. Are the real? That's the billion-dollar question. Good luck ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ev8RKZcCJHs.html

​@@archierush868archie, you're a moon-landing fanboy! If only it really happened, that would be fantastic, but unfortunately it didn't.

True. Recently someone did a study and determined that some of the dust kicked up by the LM's descent engine may have traveled a quarter of the way around the moon before it finally came down.

@@joevignolor4u949 one of the apollo missions also landed near (few hundred feet, I think) a probe we landed earlier, and the dust pretty much stripped all the paint off it and destroyed its lens

@@TheAechBomb You are talking about Apollo 12. They also cut off the probe's TV camera and its robotic arm that had scooped up some lunar soil. Both of those components were brought back and are now in a museum and I've seen them on display. Also, the TV camera had live bacteria living inside of it that was there when the camera was manufactured. It had survived several years being on the moon.

@@joevignolor4u949 I didn't know which one it was, thank you

The only time that flag will ever be 'blowing in the wind'

I watched it live. I was 15 years old. What a time to be alive!

Very true. We sure are assholes, but we sure are smart too.

Chills up your spine, seriously?

Kundalini 😅💫

@@Nekomesha ikr lmao

@Крым,Ялта ,Александр. Nope, not stupid at all. There is no air or wind on the moon. The flag had a horizontal metal tube inserted in a pocket sewn along the top edge. That was to hold the flag out and make it look like it was fluttering in the breeze. Otherwise, it would just drape down over the pole and not be very visible. The movement you can see is the flag settling down after being rammed into the lunar surface. With no air, there's no air resistance on the Moon, so it takes a while for the motion to settle down due to inertia. There is solar wind, but that works differently and would not cause the flag to flutter. Solar wind particles have very little mass and you would not notice any movement they might cause.

Edgar said it’s was a hoax

@@joshuasasfire2759source please. I’d like to see that for myself.

I’m here to tell you that this shit was faker than unicorns!

@@bullymaguire4457 : naive.

in Kerbal space program I always orient myself using the shadow of the landing craft, even after a new update introduced the "altitude from the ground" meter that showed your exact distance to the ground and not to sea level. unfortunately for the astronauts, they don't have 3rd-person-view and magic displays that are always correct

Haynes publishing has a really neat book on the Lunar Rover where that problem is discussed. One component of it is that the less than perfectly clear atmosphere here on Earth give that distance haze effect & and another is the presence of things where we know their general scale, such as trees on distant hills. And there was none of that on the moon.

Scott FW It must be a really weird sensation. Clarity everywhere! Even Mars’ thin atmosphere is enough to give it that Earth like hazy distance. I live in the mountains in Japan and the haze is something that makes every morning look different.

Thats cuz the moon isnt real is an artificial megastructure made by god to watch over earth... depth of craters isnt adding up to the moon tickness ratio and the moon itself seems to be hollow inside at ceirtan depth

@@maximpikalev9538 exactly----what I thought

Then go test it

Ssssshhh you are not supposed to think out of the fake media box

@@lesterinvester167 shut up schyzo

@@lesterinvester167 Ssssshhhhh! It’s better for you to stay quiet and have people think you might be a moron, rather than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

there are craters of all sizes.

We went to the Moon.

hoax

Post it on Reddit in appropriate subreddit, and it'll get exposure

Francot12 idiots like you who think it is fake?

Couchmann941 idiots like you who thinks this is real

@@Francot12 Chill bro sheeeiiittt.

People are sick and tired of NASA lies and bullshit. We only want to see it exposed and terminated forever.

I think he was also one of the astronaut in this video. He also landed on the moon but i can’t remember which one, but i think it’s 14

@@archierush868 Yes, that is him in the suit with the commander’s red stripes.

⁠@@dansv1I knew he was in this one. Also played golf on the moon

Possible...😅

@@tamasszakal9834 how?

@@tamasszakal9834it’s not

Sort of. We can't even get service when hiking on a mountain trail, but in 1969 they were able to tranmit via live television-from the Moon? Wow! That is incredible technology that would be nice to have today.

@@journeywithnichole986 are you joking? they couldn’t get service very well back then either, yet they could broadcast from the moon yes. That’s because those things have very little to do with each other

Yeah, they threw their PLSS (Personal Life Support System) out the hatch of the LM before ascent to save weight.

@@campbellwright3743 as moon landing is due on in future wish they retrieve the same and bring it back to earth to check what solar flare effect.

Kinda hard to in those suits.

@@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl if they can hammer a pole into the ground, they can lift their arm to thumbs up...

@@terpz47 The reason they couldn't hammer it in was because of the surface

@@gabedrinkswaterthey hammered it pretty well seeing as when they flew off you could see the amount of force was blown onto it and it didnt fall over…

@@SincerelyYoursLIVE it literally fell over

Then getting a really bad itch on your nose.😨

And realizing that you don’t know the difference between your and you’re.

@@johnp139 it’s a RU-vid comment. Not a college paper. If I wanna half ass type something I can and will. Go unalive youself

Correct.

it flaps

@@langraman8756 Really flaps during the liftoff..

@@neilbishop1686 You would too if you were standing next to that exhaust. As for the movement that is nothing more than the flexible tubular aluminum pole being twisted and moved when it is being touched. It never moved after they left it alone.

@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 That's just the wind.

Mr Man Too, its really interesting

My dad said we was offered a trip just into orbit and back when he was working for this company. It would have been like $300k and that was in 70s

That last part is very cool, but sadly that'd be like a thing during the age of being a type 2 civilisation with multiple stars to travel across.

@@stmsin even if he had accepted that, it likely would have never happened anyways. considering we have only had one singular private mission to low earth orbit in that style, that happening in the 70s is a pipedream. the majority of spaceflight startups die within a year or two. SpaceX was a good example of how close and fast bankruptcy comes.

commercial space travel will be sick.

They did. What makes you think otherwise?

@@gives_bad_advice no they were erased

@@craigdombrowski7047Says who?

Nasa

@@craigdombrowski7047 I bet you $100 you can't come up with a NASA source saying that all the telemetry from all 9 trips to the moon is gone.

Uneducated people often laugh at things they don't understand.

Crazy how this comment triggers randoms to insult.

the distance would freak me out lol

yes, like destroying the mother earth isn't exciting anymore, lets discover some more to satisfy the human ego

​@@chandruishwar1what?

I agree, but something that makes me sad is realising that 99% of the time the celestial beings are barren. When considering how empty and lifeless most are, it makes me feel so special and lucky to live on Earth, with its millions of creatures and wonders.

@@chandruishwar1 What are you doing to help? Recycling plastic?

I used to watch film of the Apolo mission as a kid in my space suit my mom made for me, upside down on the couch pretending I was about to lift off on a Saturn V. Still instills so much pride in what we as a unified nation accomplished, and what we contributed to the world.

@L. Dega i mean theres proof, satellites have taken pictures, the Chinese rover on the moon has proven it, and what would the Chinese gain from furthering a American lie if we didnt land on the moon? But no, you're right, we didn't and theres no proof.

@L. Dega no it didn't, it landed in Mare Imbrium which is on the light side of the moon.

@L. Dega ok you've answered nothing. I did the research and gave you an actual location on the moon, which i cross referenced with multiple credible sources and you follow up with " NO!!!! LOL it landed on the far side dude" very convincing argument. But I guess we'll see just how wrong you are when the Artemis program goes back to the moon, with hi-res photos but youll probably deny those as well.

It was amazing....and still is.

agreed

Same here! The way they hop around with what looks like a bookbag and the boots is adorable 😃

That is so weird 😕

The kind of heroes who get a star on the Walk of Fame in Hollywood....for......

Because its all fake lol

@@xxmemekipxxlastname4846is an idiot prove it then.

@@wolfbbq6076 you prove that it did happen.

XxMemekipxX last name The vast body of evidence supports the reality of the Apollo programme. The onus is on you - and pointing at images declaring them to be fake because of “reasons” is not evidence. I wait with baited breath.......

@@martinc3918 dude i dont understand half the words youre saying but thats not proof it happened

www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/

@@ancelrick5396 wow, this is great. Thanks

@@andrewangerer1399 I enjoyed it when I stumbled onto it. They seem to be the complete film rolls, crappy pictures and all

@@ancelrick5396 Wow! Great page Ancel Rick! There is like every photo in Apollo history there!

At age 9, going on 10, it was a magical time to be alive and seeing the first Moon Launch and Landing live on TV. It seemed like an eternity while watching all the prior test Launches from the fatal tragedy of Apollo 1 on through to the Lunar Orbiter to Apollo 11's landing. Then it became a routine mission in a short span of 3 years and 5 months from 11 to 17, with the miracle of Apollo 13 in between. The Space program was bever as exciting since, with the exception of several of the Mars Rover landings.

Unfortunately, the conspitards aren't radio amateurs, just regular amateurs.

@@ArKritz84 Amateurs? You think they have basic skills? Impossible, some of them claim Antartica is fake and say it’s impossible to go there when the only thing you need to do is fill out a short form and you can go. For the UK, it’s literally a single piece of paper, and tourism is a valid reason to why you can go there. You can’t call these guys amateurs when they cant fill out a single form which can be done in less than 5 minutes

Lies. And as for the USSR, they were run by the same people behind the scenes, the cold war was a psy-op designed to keep both populations living in fear, while at the same time allowing the 13 families who run the world to embezzle hundreds of billions of dollars from both sides.

They had reliable communication with the module lander. It really was a feat. Lots of math involved. Apollo 13 was the only mission I think that didn’t land on the moon.

@@cwstewartjr1973 where do you think we get radio waves and microwaves and heat waves from? The air around us. Even then communication existed even in the early 1900s. So if your phone loses signal take it with your phone company. They should have towers around your area. You’re paying them to provide a service without interruption.

Forget the flag moving. There's so much more to think about. The live footage that wasn't live. The grainy black and white footage. In 1963 a civilian filmed the JFK assassination in colour. 6 years later the wealthiest (tax funded) organisation recorded the biggest event ever undertaken by mankind in poor quality black and white footage. No one has been back to the moon since. So many modern luna rovers have landed on the moon. There's modern satellites, rovers and the launch of the JWT. Nothing has proved the biggest event in human history. Why? The JWT is able see the universe in a way that was unimaginable. So when the JWT was launched Why not point it at the moon landing? Why are all moon rover landings no where near the Apollo Landings? The moon landings have been a conspiracy since day 1. Why not have a rover/satellite pass over the site and use the amazing modern cameras to film it? Such evidence would silence the non believer's. Modern technology has done nothing to prove the haters wrong.

didnt happen

- Lorence Welk's favorite phrase.

Vande mataram 🇮🇳🇮🇳

@@siddheshnalawade5380 which city u live?

Yes🎉

Vande mataram

Yes I'm from Hyderabad 🚩

Fake

I expected more from a Cohen to understand deception. Smh

@@anatoli28 Your brain is fake.

Its amazing what Hollywood was capable of doing even back then

Je älter desto moderner.

It was affected by someone holding it.

You mean the reaction of the rocket?

I was 8 at the time, and I remember a very blurry black and white image of neil armstrong setting foot on the moon. it's one of those moments that you always remember where you were. the first image from the surface of Mars in 76 came down. of course the challenger explosion, 9/11, the eruption of mt st helens woke me up out of my bed hundreds of miles away, it was so loud I thought it might be a nuclear bomb, the watergate hearings that summer of 73, jimmy carters surprise defeat in the 1980 election to ronald regan. the fall of the berlin wall, the night that trump won, etc etc

@Andre you must have just finished watching the breathless 1 year anniversary of jan 6th, on msnbc cnn, abc, nbc, cbs, pbs bbc the new york times, the wash post. yes, JUST like 9/11, pearl harbor, of course. 9/11, 3,000 people killed, pearl habor the beginning of world war two with japan and 2,000 more dead. jan 6th? one person died, and she was shot by a capital police guy, two others that died were from heart attacks or one guy died a day later from a stroke. fabricated news stories about how they "insurrectionists" tried to beat to death a police officer with a fire extinguisher. Ok, now's the part where you accuse me of only watching fox news. for me, the reason why I remembered where I was on the night trump got elected, was not because I particularly liked trump, I did not and did not vote for him and I still find him a bit of a fool, what I found so memorable, was the utter shock from these networks that trump won. I found it highly entertaining how shocked and stunned they were. how could t his possibly happen? they were so depressed, so upset. hillary was so upset she couldn't bear to even address her followers. it was a glorious thing to watch

@Andre "more recently, there have been differing reports that he was injured by a fire extinguisher and that he did not suffer any blunt force injuries. His own MOTHER said she believed he died from a stroke the next day, not from a fatal blow to the head. "New ruling of his death has been officially attributed to strokes, prompting "reevalution" of initial coverage" (By all the above media outlets) "commenting on a time article "One would never know from reading this (the first reports that he had been hit in the head with a fire ext, or, even BEATEN TO DEATH with it. Brutally beaten to death! had a big gash on his head! ) that's what was first reported. "That false account was widely quoted in yet another media fiasco"

@Andre uhh, all I did was say because you compared trump winning an election to 3,000 people murdered, killed, on 9/11.I just thought you were the type that would just relish that jan 6th 1 year anniversary of that riot that they play on a loop on all those networks. you compared trump winning an election to 9/11, then your fearless progressive leaders went on and compared jan 6th to 9/11 also. so I thought you had good company there. get some help for your TDS although I'm not so sure there is a cure because you guys are just too far gone.

@Andre uhh, your the one that responded first with something that had nothing to do with the topic.you compared trump winning an election to 9/11. so I responded to that insanity. then you say keep on the topic. and anything I say you say is "nonsense" "gibberish" "out of context" etc. look it up for yourself that is if google searches would ever have anything from something other than the NY times, the wash post, the la times, msnbc, etc. how can you just called "nonsense" that his own mother said he died from a stroke. this is out there, this is proven. the media jumped on the whole bashing his head in with a fire extinguisher with ZERO evidence. I didn't give any context or sources because that would make for an overly long post. for proof, is msnbc, or the various democrats on the senate hearings now claiming that this guy was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher? no, because its simply not true. but it was widely reported right after the jan 6th riot. because the left wing news outlets wanted it to look as bad as they possibly could, so they just went with it without knowing what actually happened. fact, the media said he was "beaten to death" by a raging rioter with a fire extinguisher. fact, he died the next day from a stroke. he had no, nothing nada zero wounds on his head or anywhere.those are the facts. they wanted to promote the image of this poor cop being beaten to death with a blunt object by trump supporters, in order to further their agenda. not one rioter who got inside was armed, not one. people on the left always say to cops, why couldn't you just use a taser? why did you have to shoot the poor person? or just shoot them in the leg, etc. but this cop just shot her dead for climbing through a door. she was no threat to anybody. she was a mom, a military vet who served in the gulf war. she most certainly did not "deserve" to be shot dead.

Lets see if you can guess why

That's what confirmed it wasn't faked (as people have said), for me.

Good observation. I always wondered how close ups of the gold thermal wrap around the LM's legs dont appear to show any dust.

@@rtreaper9985 YEP< it would be stupid to repeat the mistakes , the second time around.

Looks like landing would have kicked so much dust that they wouldn't see anything for days. It was clear immediately.

That dust is actually a huge hazard for the astronauts and equipment. It's so fine and sharp, it is terrible if you inhale it.

Some things just shouldn’t be said

How much DeltaV does your ass have?

Djordje Oljaca About 3.5km/s

lmaoooooo

@TheDigitalDecade. Yes, science communication is really important because there's so much illiteracy about it. I find it strange some of the beliefs people have when there's so much evidence to the contrary.

It's was for the fame, richs, books, house hold name, money,

lol keep crying son, the truth is for men

didnt happen

faketastic

​@@dj-gf9coexactly.. In this video moon seems to have bulges. But in actual it has shallow hole. They just created all this in a studio as best as they can from what they observed from telescope of what moon looks like. But moon didn't look like anything they've shown

​@@ladybuggaming25okay scientist😂. You guys need to go back school lol

didnt happen

If NASA filmed themselves on the sun the pro-Apollo-nutters would __100%___ believe it and we would be the "conspiracy theorists" for even questioning it.

Twisting it into the post causes it to sway. It’s motionless just before they lift off and in some footage, it’s motionless for hours

Where? Timestamp, please.

Serious Question: What exactly did you expect the flag to do when the astronauts shook it and rotated the flagpole? Stay still??

@themorgan. These are basic questions that you should already know the answers to. Why are you ignorant to the evidence?

@@Microlynz how did you know give me prove

@@Microlynz no it’s not fake with knowledge of space and if your too into space it’s not fake at all I know many people are skeptical about these stuff cuz well they weren’t there to see it

@@Microlynzit's official footage from NASA, so no, it isn't fake.

@@greenblood6186 Lol. The institution founded by a group of ACTUAL Nazi's brough from Germany after WWII... I mean I believe the footage is real, but it being from NASA doesn't mean shit tbh.

@Astro24451 Remember when the USA gave Netherlands a moon rock in the &0s? And 20 years later it turned out it was just a piece of petrified wood.? You think they got the petrified wood from the moon?

it s not funny

You should set up a hot dog stand, sell tickets, give tours. Could actually be funny.

Damn, you have a big ass backyard!

@@simpleinverso8628 doesnt look that big to me haha look closely

Shut up... I know nothing about that