Are They Hiding Aliens? Body Language Analyst reacts: Government Whistleblower, David Grusch! 

I worked inside the Beltway for a decade and during that time had a TS-SCI clearance for cybersecurity issues. I had a lot of professional and social acquaintances in various other departments and branches, and one thing you need to understand is that individuals with various clearances will talk vaguely, generally and parenthetically about something they should not talk about, but when it comes to actual facts and data, they draw the line, because that is disclosing specific classified information, and if you have a clearance you take that very seriously. Consider also that Grusch was not read in on any of these programs, he was following leads and interviewing individuals...and time after time hitting the wall of what they were willing to disclose. So it stands to reason that his information lacks specificity, and so too his discussion of what he knows. Also, he is using "briefed" very generally, as military officers often do. His briefs may have not been official interviews but rather just discussions. So all this is to say that I think reading his body language is particularly difficult in this case because he has basically synthesized a conclusion based on his work and however many discussions he has had, but the hard facts were withheld from him. And he himself needs to skirt whatever classified information he does have, however it was obtained. One section of the interview that illustrates this is his mention of heavy isotopes in retrieved materials. Gary Nolan, a Stanford pathology professor, has examined these materials and is free to talk about them, and does. He calls them bewildering, because no one on earth would go to the considerable expense of creating them when they serve no known materials science or engineering purpose, but he does not consider them conclusive proof of anything. Grusch appears to be using them as an example...because the information is unclassified...but departing from Nolan's conclusion and apparently weaving it together with other information he has acquired and saying "It's definite proof." Personally I find the man and the fact he has come forward to be fascinating, and will follow this closely going forward. I can't for the life of me understand what he would have to gain from fabricating all this, and clearly he has lost a lot in the process. I believe that a lot of sources who he trusts have confirmed the existence of what he discusses to the point where he has concluded all the information he has gathered is true. But he has no proof. What a difficult and anxiety provoking position that must be for him.

This is clearly NOT a whistle blowing "thing". He was given persmission to speak... at a level... and no further. He was told what to say. We are being told as a "soft" launch, that we are not alone; in a way that people can process it... without freaking out. He is the "spokesperson" for the first official release. Stay tuned. marcus

There is a difference between whistleblowing and sharing classified info. The latter is a felony and can get you charged with treason. He is sharing the info that SHOULD have been shared with congress but has not been. That part, he cannot be charged for and he is protected by the whistleblower laws.

As someone with a secret clearance I can tell you he isn’t lying. We have to dance around any facts. We can give generalizations, but cannot disclose anything that breaches our none disclosure agreements. Getting uncomfortable with certain questions is because you have to tailor every single word you say to ensure you aren’t breaching classification.

Spidey, you are right in that this does not have a normal whistleblower feel to it because it’s not. If you delve further into what occurred, you will learn that when Grusch learned of these things-saw compelling photos and evidence that he felt was being illegally and unethically kept from Congress and the public about secret government retrieval programs-he did not intend to be a whistleblower himself. Instead, what he did was this: in 2021 he gave all this evidence to the ICIG (Intelligence Community, Inspector General) office-people with the necessary security clearances above him, and he expected and relied upon these authorities to handle the situation properly. What happened, however, was a nightmare for him, because his name was leaked (?) to people who didn’t necessarily have security clearances and other government agencies and even private contractors who began a retaliation campaign against him for the next year. So in 2022, David retained an attorney, Irvin Charles McCullough, III, a former U.S. Inspector General himself, who sent a document-a whistleblower complaint-to Avril Haynes, head of the Department of National Intelligence (DNI), outlining the reprisals and retaliations that he had been subjected to after the information he gave the ICIG. He stated these reprisals included his impugned character, judgment, professionalism and mental health and he stated that his access to IC (Intelligence Community) elements had been cancelled, denied, delayed and improperly obstructed (in other words, he could no longer do his beloved job because of what he had told the Inspector General). In December, 2022, President Biden signed into law a protection for whistleblowers of government agencies, so Grusch left his beloved job with the newly formed AARO agency (to investigate UAPs) and testified UNDER OATH for 11 hours before Congress-showing them hundreds of pages of documents and photos as evidence about what he knew about secret agencies involved in retrieval of alien craft and pilots-and he gave the Ross Coulthart television interview you are analyzing, and he gave the reporters Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean all the information that they reported on in The Debrief article that was published about the retrieval program. You, Spidey, and other skeptical people-who are criticizing Grusch by saying he did not give first hand evidence of what he has disclosed about the secret retrieval program our country has hidden from Congress and the American people-evidently do not understand that he could NOT disclose classified information in his television interview because he did something ETHICAL that most whistleblowers would not do. Grusch is a patriot and he follows rules, and even though he discovered things he strongly believed that was information that was being unethically and and illegally withheld from Congress and the American people and that he was doing the correct thing by making that information known, he nevertheless first went to the DOD (Department of Defense) and garnered their approval of what he COULD disclose (unclassified information) before his television interview. And because he only spoke about what the DOD approved he could speak about, people are now accusing him of not giving conclusive evidence and therefore saying he is not believable, without considering all the evidence he gave previously gave Congress UNDER OATH. And people are not taking into consideration all the evidence that other high-ranking officials have now also testified about in front of Congress because of David Grusch’s testimony, and the fact that so many of these high-ranking officials have also testified to the veracity of Grusch’s testimony and his character. Grusch withheld talking about classified information in a television interview because he remains a patriot. Sadly, because of that, people are dismissing the importance of what he has said.

"Is he lying about aliens? Or, are the aliens lying about him?"

Fascinating. I actually commented on a recent video that I am anxious about people not believing me and as a result show ALL the signs of being untruthful, simply because I fear not being believed. Glad to see that I am not the only one.

Hoping you will do a follow up on this now we've seen him give evidence in the congressional hearing. I think he is not a whistle blower, I think he's putting stuff out that the US wants to put out there without it being an official announcement, maybe because it's part truth, or maybe because it just helps provide a cover story to take the spotlight off something else.

It occurs to me that his answers, to some of the questions, are very vague and actually are based on information we already know. For example the question 'We are not alone?' and he states the information he has says we are definitely not alone. Ok, but thats been accepted for decades now. Nearly every scientist agrees that considering the size of the universe there must be other species out there. Another question he is asked is 'Have you seen spacecraft?' and his answer is he has read reports and seen pictures .... well, hell, haven't we all?! UFO's have been around forever, we have all, at some time or another, read accounts of people seeing them, seen video and pictures of supposed UFO's. He didn't say he has seen them with his own eyes, he obfuscated.

"Why draw the line?" It's definitely consistent with my outside-looking-in experience as a military spouse. The military has a culture of hyper-compartmentalization (you only get info on a "need-to-know" basis) and that's protocol in every branch, every office. Officers have bits and pieces of information, but only the top brass has all the info--because only the top brass has the clearance to discuss, interpret, and make a decision on all the info. And, they are all conditioned to not ask questions unless they are clear that it's an area where they need to know the answer. So those without top clearance are left to sit and wonder, but they don't do that for long. They move on to focus on their job. It's a deliberate cultural structure to prevent too much thinking/assuming lower down the rungs so that orders are followed without question. That, of course, is a safety protocol for battle/field training. If you start commiserating with your higher-ups, you might get ideas that you have enough info to make a decision and a bad, ill-informed decision could very well cost lives. Hierarchy and compartmentalization are everything in military culture.

It's like Ed Snowden saying, "There's some evidence I've been told over the years that the government might have some insight into our daily lives, but I can't say anything more."

My intuition from watching you analyze this man on the interview makes me believe that scripting the whole interview is easily possible to secrete information or use this as a curtain to cover up something more important.

In 2012 I took my 3 kids on a cross country trip. My oldest daughter was 17, my middle son was 13, my youngest was 9. While driving through a very dark area in Texas I saw a few miles in front of me an object that was very bright. My son was sitting next to me and my daughters were in the back seat, sleeping. I looked over to my son and I asked if he could see what I was seeing. He shook his head yes. As we got closer, we saw what appeared to be a metal hexagonal structure. I woke my 17 year old and all 3 of us could see it. So definitely not my imagination. It didn’t have cables, or anything holding it up about 100 feet over the road. We drove directly under it. No sound at all, but it moved my dodge 1500 truck around like we were in the strongest wind I had ever driven in. I had floored it by then, just to get away as fast as I could. About a year or so ago I told a relative that I am pretty close to, and have known their whole life, who works with top secret agencies about this. They told me I am not crazy, and we (the public) would be given information about this stuff within the next year. Low an behold stuff like this keeps coming out. I also used to babysit for a friend who works as an aerospace engineer who builds drones. He knows things like how fast vessels can move. About 3 years ago while we were talking in my front yard at night he spotted an aircraft flying overhead and it was defying our laws of physics. When I say that man was dead certain that this aircraft was not ours, I mean it. I believe they have been here this whole time. Maybe they are the reasons why the pyramids were able to be made? Maybe they decided to go into hiding because they are conducting an experiment on us? 😂 Also, I definitely believe we have some of their vessels and we are reverse engineering their technology. We went from having computers the size of buildings, to having computers in the palm of our hands WAY TO FAST! I know it sounds crazy, but how can we have technology like the James Webb telescope that can literally see into the past, but we have genetic diseases and cancers that we can’t cure? This stuff doesn’t add up to me. 😂

He is knowinly or unknowingly part of the "Disclosure" program which began with the Pentagon acknowledgement of UAP's. The interviewer Ross Coulthart previously mentioned he was told information that if true is absolutely terrifying and this is a common theme expressed in explaining this slow segmented release of information, simply to prevent shock and chaos. Excellent video analysis as always and the "belonging" highlights makes be believe he's a team player whistle blower with a script and a plan.

He's not a whistleblower, he is a classified spokesperson

Please analyse the UAP Congress hearing now, with this guy and two other guys. It would be a good follow up to this video! Thank you! :)

His vigorous head shake when he talked about his childhood was almost like he was wanting to move it along (like flicking through pages in a book until you get to where you want to read) because he didn't consider it relevant to the conversation ahead. As soon as he started talking about his career history, his head gesture switched immediately to small nods.

Pet peeve of mine is people who say NUCULAR instead of Nuclear JAGWIRE instead of Jaguar HEIGTH instead of Height SUPPOSEBLY instead of Supposedly

I think the Dude has been punked xD. They all got together and tricked him and now they are laughing xD. HE seems that type of guy that would believe anything. Since he clearly wants to belong to something i am guessing that their colleagues are just making fun of him . Dude just throws technical words to sound smart... All he talks about are just theorys, nothing proven. Whistleblower.... Oh no i cannot disclose that information... wtf...

Your explanation about baseline and certain 'tells', as well as showing the research, is really helpful to the deeper understanding of body language analysis. Thank you, Spidey! 😊

I believe that he is telling the truth based on his understanding. The one theme that hasn't been mentioned is that not one person on earth is perfect. He could take all the conclusive evidence he has heard/believes to be true, seen documents that aligns with his beliefs, be completely truthful, and still be wrong. His sense of wanting to belong has interfered with his ability to unbiasly determine fact from fiction. While he may feel that he's doing the right thing, whether it's true or not is a completely different issue. If there was an intelligent organization trying to hide something, they would make sure to cover all areas of issue. However, humans aren't perfect and until a mistake is made, we must go by the facts. His testimony makes a lot of assumptions without evidence, and because he has been deemed honest in his position, people are looking into it. But that does not make it true. Psychology and the fact that humans are not perfect leads me to personally conclude that what he is saying is not credible, but possible. I don't think much is going to come from this issue, because even if what he's saying IS true, it would NEVER be allowed to become public knowledge for security issues, because intelligent people know that humans aren't perfect. A lack of evidence creates speculation. And correlation between speculation and fact can be a very dangerous thing...

This is a great video. I haven't finished it yet. I'm at the point where discussing the word "nuclear" and I wanted to address a couple things about his "science" talk and that word. I served in the Marine Corps, Army, and was a Computer Engineer for NASA. So I have a pretty solid background on the fundamentals of what this guy is talking about. First off I want to talk about "nuclear". I personally pronounced all my life until recently (about the age of 31ish) "nook-u-ler", because when I was 10 years old that's how President George Bush said it addressing the nation in 2001 and the terrorist attacks. This messed me up for 2 decades and I only broke the habit because my wife made fun of me every time I said it (being in the engineering field, I use the word frequently enough for it to be a thing). It is indeed pronounced "new-clear", and there is nothing special about the other way except for ignorance. Secondly, his use of scientific terms and numbers. When it comes to the reports, he might not know the specific number. He is probably getting a lot of different numbers from different cases with different security clearances and with different "need-to-knows". What the general public doesn't understand about security clearances is that just because you are a Colonel who runs an infantry battalion, doesn't mean you get to know about a space alien project. You fight wars, you don't do research. Even if you were qualified to have an opinion because you might have a science degree, you still don't have a need-to-know because that's not your job and you're not up to speed on what's happening. You would be completely lost if you started having opinions in that field, and that's how misinformation starts... people talking out their asses about things they don't know or understand. And that goes on to how he's describing "heavy metals" and "isotopes". What he's doing with those words is a general description. Even in the scientific community this is how you work describe them. You wouldn't know them all off the top of your head, you would have to reference the periodic table. Even if he did have an exhaustive list of elements, it would be hard to remember them. And when he starts talking about the possibilities of what could be happening with the nuclear weapons and either different countries or aliens conducting research, this is actually main stream science right now. He's not really pulling this out of his ass. War is unconventional now. It's all cyber and happening within governments. You don't win wars by killing. You win wars by disrupting communications. And he sounds "crazy" talking about other dimensions and quantum mechanics, but that's current and mainstream science now. It's been scientifically proven for over a decade now and is being taught in universities. We're even learning that a lot of our classical mechanics are actually wrong. Textbooks are being rewritten because of what we've learned through quantum mechanics. The reasons we thought things were happening are actually happening for other reasons. We've just been fortunate enough that they are so close to the truth that they work. To really understand what this guy is saying would take 4 semesters in the physics field. It's not that anyone is too stupid to understand (the lower level concepts we all learned in elementary school), it's just that you can't jump from addition and subtraction into algebra before learning multiplication and division. Same thing happening here. He can't really describe it in any more layman's terms, these are their own exclusive things, and they are the things that keep scientists up at night.

Speaking of belonging, being a whistleblower you're going against who you chose to be grouped with & who you respect, so he is aligning himself with another group, who technically are very very similar to the group he already is in, that he still respects, and many in that group are also in the new group, but another group of people who are considered ethical and truthful and good, which are the "boy scouts"of the world.

There's a conflict between him supposedly being someone who is supposed to investigate non-human contact and the fact that he seems to be shown this evidence clandestinely like he isn't supposed to know about it. Surely an actual investigator would need all the known information so that he knows what to look for and how to evaluate any potential clues he comes across. It's like sending out a police detective to find a murderer but not giving them the witness descriptions or the make of their car. I'm leaning towards this being a deliberate leak where he has been at least semi-duped. He has been shown some manufactured information which he believes is factual and that makes his telling of the tale more believable, because he believes it.

38:40 I think his sense of belonging pushed him to this (as I mentioned earlier he didn't feel he belonged when he wasn't read into secrets he felt were within his purview) and what you picked up from the belonging to the whole humanity is where he now wants to belong now as a heroic whistleblower uniting us all. He may not of felt so globally before as he talks about American this and that but when the interviewer gave him a larger picture it probably warmed his heart with a sense that he doesn't just belong to America as a hero but to the world as someone that united everyone. In his mind this is probably the best thing in the world as he gives that sense of belonging to all when we all band together as humanity.

I think we can all agree that the highest level of secrecy within the government doesn’t allow whistleblowers. Those individuals pass away from crazy accidents or random acts of violence.

I can’t remember where I read or heard this, but I think it was “The End of the World” podcast by Josh Clark: it seems as though the government gives employees access to false information regularly. Perhaps to confuse the truth, perhaps to test employee’s trustworthiness.

This was so great and detailed! I’ve watched another body language analysis video of this interview before this one but yours are definitely much more entertaining and very easy to understand you’ve cleared some of my questions about the interview. Thanks 🙏🏻

This was an excellent and fascinating analysis. What Grusch is saying is very difficult to believe, regardless of how much so many of us want to. I freely admit that I want to believe and I hope this leads to undeniable proof being made public in the near future. I think the biggest factor that’s making me lean towards believing Grusch is the fact that he’s moved beyond just doing interviews with the media. He just testified under oath before Congress and told them all of the same things he’s said in this interview. Does that mean he’s telling the truth? Definitely not. But it does mean that the stakes have become significantly higher for him if he is proven to be lying. Time will tell.

Hi Spidey! Long time watcher and fan, but I never get to videos this early so this might be the only comment of mine you ever potentially see. Just wanted to say that I've learned so much from your videos and often use the techniques to help me know if my kids are being truthful to me 😂👌 Hope you are having a wonderful day.

Lol “who’s looking at is face? Who’s doing that?” 😂 I got the same vibes you did at the end there! It felt like the more important goal to him was us coming together as just humans. He literally says “*all I want* is a moment of pause to see if this moment *units us*” He is right that in recent years there seems to be more to divide us than not. I like the sentiment. I don’t think the exposing of aliens is what held the most weight to him here though.

"I've always wanted to be a part of something bigger than myself." Sums it all up as one of the two extremes: 1. He's lying for greater attention. 2. He's totally convinced that everything that the supposed insiders were feeding him are absolutely true and he is risking his career to emerge as a disclosure hero.

If you haven’t watched his interview with congress yesterday please do. He’s a bit more transparent, or at least as much as he can be without breaking any laws. He answers many more questions.

Yeah. He is definitely NOT a whistleblower. He is just on assignment. That is glaringly obvious. This was a very interesting analysis. I watched a clip of this and I saw the lip compression and hoped you would talk about this interview. Also, you made me LOL in the middle where you were "exposed" for studying his face! Haha.

Your work is a treasure in todays world where deception is prevalent. I want to thank you for your work that is keeping us on the path of truth and righteousness.

Can we compare Snowden and Grusch? We all know who the REAL whistleblower is!! Will the real whistleblower please stand up?

Is it just me or does this guy look like easy to manipulate? Don't know, it is a feeling, that deep need for belonging sounds like a powerful thing to exploit by someone else. Just a thought, or a vibe.

Your impression of ‘whistleblower’ is spot on. When he said he can’t talk about it because it would reveal classified operations that means either he was briefed about them (he had the appropriate clearance) of people told him classified info he was not cleared to. If that was the case then he ‘s not violating any NDA he has signed by talking about it because he doesn’t actually know the facts - he’s not be read into the program and therefore he would not be violating any security clearance by talking about them … this is quite suspicious behavior

When I first watched the entire interview, I had the feeling of deception. It may be entirely real but he is deceptive. I always go with gut feeling. It's rarely wrong.

I love your analysis! It' actually quite spooky to me to be honest. Grush providing speculation about the alien's intent or lack of action, which he has no way of knowing as you said, was offered in response to the interviewer's question which was speculative to begin with. Grush should have simply stated he doesn't know which would have been consistent with someone who is just trying to state the things that he does know.

I absolutely guarantee you that if you asked me a question, you would say I’m lying when I’m telling you the truth. It happens with my wife all the time. I guess I’m as bad at telling the truth as I am about lying 😂

For a whistleblower that was boring as heck! But your breakdown was not.i also love how you give your examples..👏👍❤️

He can still "whistle blow" about ufo stuff, but that doesn't necessarily allow him to reveal unrelated classifies info where there may be other consequences.

*14 years in the military does not qualify you for full retirement.* _You need 20 years, not 19 years and 363 days you need 20 years- _*_so after putting it all that time why didn’t he wait to be eligible for a full retirement?_*

Several newspapers would not run his story because it can’t be corroborated. There is one article which the writer notes this guy isn’t saying anything new. In fact some say he is using the same “script”.

23:23 In my short experience in the military I can tell you they will give you whatever information they want, what they need only so you do your job and you’re not expected to ask questions. It’s not always the case, it depends very much on your commanding officer and how they handle things, some are more open and explain orders, others just give the orders and asking questions will just get you in trouble.

I for one find it incredible that we have these objects ( whatever their origin) flying about doing these insane speeds. If its human based - its incredible - if its extraterrestrial, its incredible - if its us from the future, its incredible. Whatever the answer is, it's one of the biggest storys ever. I wish we had this technology when I'm faced with a four hour drive!! This thing is like a sci-fi film but its actually real!!. What a time!

Now I understand why I always thought that if I was put on the spot, let’s say like being put on a witness stand for example or even a doctors visit….. I have this huge “fear”…that they won’t believe me….. so when you say that people look deceptive in those moments…….. that probably describes me! I always say that people may think I am lying when I know I am not, but I have major social anxiety in those moments….

This was a great analysis. Certain government agencies have a history of using people like this in the past. So I wouldn’t doubt that he was only allowed to “reveal” whatever it is he is revealing.

People have been coming forward and saying these things for decades. The real question is why the government is making a spectacle of it now

Spidey, I think this is one of, if not my most favourite behavioural analysis you've done. Not because of the subject matter (not that interesting), but the way you described the various elements at play and how they potentially build up to a hollistic conclusion....great stuff. Keep up the good work!

Yes! Thank you so much for this. The general vibe I got from this interview is as if he was brought there to present just a sneak peek of a narrative that perhaps is going to be unfolded in the following months. And also him referring to that belonging all the time, it feels like he wants to invite us into this narrative. And some fear sprinkled on top of that about aliens suposedly killing people...I'm interested in how this is going to play out. I love your videos, so informative and entertaining! ❤

31:41 I’m floored Spidey you are so funny, your jokes are always perfectly timed lmfaooo!

This "revelation" is part of a larger plot to guide our thinking towards/away from something else.

It’s a smugness that he knows he is doing a big psyops mission. It is the same energy I have when I play Coop against friends.

Is it possible that he is very guarded because he has to be really careful not to divulge highly classified information? ***EDIT Mr Grusch is autistic. I’m not okay with the way the body language analysts have handled this.****

I think you underestimate just how far down the alien rabbit hole we have actually gone already.

I just watched another another body language analyst called The behavior Panel. I must say by far you are so much easier to listen too. You explain better. You give informative details while leaving out your personal opinion. To be honest I don't know if you believe him or not and I LOVE that. I'm not looking for someone's analysis with a decision already made in their head so they point out things that fit their agenda. Sorry for the rant. Just had a bad experience with other body language "experts" and your a relief to watch.

If we find out he’s telling the truth, Bob Lazar is going to pop up and say, “See?! I was right all along!” 😂

The crested said, “It doesn’t have that whistleblower vibe.” Brilliant observation.

Let’s also keep in mind that he is an intelligence officer. Perhaps one that was chosen for this exact purpose. To “blow on a whistle”

He’s not a whistleblower. His credentials are no joke. He is giving the public and congress what he can about his discoveries without getting himself into trouble. He’s done this 100% the right way. It’s the people and agencies he’s spoken to that need to be questioned. There’s plenty more to come. This is not going back in the box.

I LOVE how detailed you are. You're really trying to teach us! Thank u I'm a subscriber now for sure

What if he has that sense of belonging because he IS the alien himself and wants to infiltrate the human race without us noticing?? That would also explain why he cant go into details about his own spacecraft and race... 🤔🤐 Im just joking obviously. 😁🤣 It was a really fun and entertaining video as always. Please keep up the good work!

I remember a story about someone finding a wrecked flying saucer and he had this chunk of metal to prove it. When the local university looked at it, they discovered it was a strange amalgam of different metals and plastic. Turns out the guy who turned in this fragment worked at a waste disposal facility, cleaning out leftover scrap from furnaces that remained.

Wow, that 40+ minute presentation seemed to fly by! Your videos are always so interesting Spidey - the entertainment part - is just a bonus. Thank you for what you do. (I want to watch BOTH of the two that were suggested at the end.)

Eye blocking: When I got a long illness, with a lot of fatique, brain fog brain, and pain, I started closing my eyes a lot when talking, which I realized I didn't normally do.

YES!!! Thank you for covering this Spidy. I’ve been closely following the topic of “disclosure” and, although I’m not expert, I do have a theory regarding some Grusch’s odd language. Grusch took months planning what he disclosed in this interview, making sure he stayed within the boundaries of the new 2023 “UAP whistleblow protection” law. He has already testified under oath to Congress and had his background fully verified before speaking speaking publicly. Grusch also hired Dan Sheehan who is known to be the UAP whistleblowers’ lawyer. I believe Grusch uses non-specific language when answering certain questions - like are aliens on Earth? - in a way that instructs the audience to read between the lines. After his analysis, Spidy addressed a good point about the apparent lack of whistleblowing because there’s nothing concrete presented here. And I agree. But here is what’s important about Grusch: he isn’t giving us the goods, he’s handing us a list of what to go look for. His testimony is groundbreaking because he’s the first credible person to speak publicly about several points here, and keep in mind that aspiring whistleblowers have reported death threats should they talk. Nuclear vs Nucular This is an accent thing in some areas. @TheBehavioralArts I know you are Québec, so this might ring to you. My family from Québec who learned English as a second language later in life (my mom is one) often say “nucular” even though they are educated and write the correctly. I don’t think Grusch is a francophone, but it’s possible that particular accent issue happens with certain English dialects.

I always enjoy your videos. Such great learning looking at practical real examples, and very interesting ones. Thanks for all your work on these videos

I hear that guy (Grusch) talking and the only thing I see is a little boy pulling on his mother's dress saying "Mum, mum, look what I made." But his mother never looked... He is not only someone who wants to belong to a group. He wants to belong to a very special group. He wants to be seen, he wants to be recognized (that's why he always liked uniforms). Either he is lying or he was deceived BUT by people who realized how easy it is to deceive him if they told him "secret/special" information. This much is clear: He's a boaster and 90% of the people would this see at first glance.

This is really fair and balanced 👍🏻thanks I think there’s more to the legal constraints of whistleblowing and also the science, which would explain some of the inconsistencies. Interesting times !

David Grusch was the leading an investigation and found areas of the government, despite having high levels of clearance, restricting access to him and others. Restricting access in an investigation was illegal and was looking to prosecute officials. It just happened to be an area where it was thought to hold exotic technology not of this world. As far as I’ve understood about this case. As always, journalists and publics focus will on aliens and such. This channel is awesome and I’ve always learned something new and fascinating ❤❤

I found it very interesting when he was talking about the head shaking back-and-forth, not necessarily meaning deception. When I listen to something that’s absolutely amazing. I shake my head back-and-forth as well. That movement means to me that it is completely amazingly unbelievable and I am very interested in it. So he was absolutely right about that. I’m sure he’s absolutely right about other things but I know from experience he’s right about that. Lol! Also I feel that the explanation of the aliens is cut short because government only wants to sprinkle in facts. I think he has to be careful how far he goes in telling this information.

This video exceeded my expectations. I anticipated a simplistic judgment of his body language as deceptive or some other trivial interpretation. However, your expertise and insightful analysis pleasantly surprised me. I thoroughly enjoyed your content and sincerely appreciate it. Subscribed. Thank you!

J'apprécie vraiment le fait que tes analyses ne sont pas "biaisées" ou du moins, que tu ne forces pas une trame narrative pour confirmer ta propre opinion contrairement à d'autres panels de "behavior analysts" sur RU-vid.

I was kidnapped by aliens once. Went into a gray bar for some water, woke up in the woods with my pants around my ankles and a sore bottom. Only thing I remember was one of them saying 'purdy', which must be alien for water or something. I cried.

Hi spidey, just wanted to thank you for all your content. You are a master in the art of explaining the why's and when's of the behavioral arts as well. Keep up the great work and thank you for your hard work. Also any chance of you doing a video on reading kids body language? I'm pretty good at telling when my kids are lying " I read eyes" is what I've been telling them but lately as they get in their preteens I find it a bit more challenging.

We know body language isn't always accurate and in most cases are not due to things such as nerves. Being in front if cameras knowing millions maybe watching you etc. All these are factors to take into consideration when viewing body language. Even when soneone tells you something 100% true and knows how it'll be taken as a lie/ false thryll actuslly tell it like it's a lie because in the back of their mind they know they're being judged or views what they're saying as if they were flipped around and thinks that they themselves are lying. It's so bad that its worse of a way to detect honesty than a lie detection test which thosevare no long amicable in court

I think he was trying to be super careful with his answer to the question about people being killed so that he wouldn’t go to jail. I find what he’s said to be astounding, even without proof. Only people who have studied the ufo phenomenon or have heard much of the inexplicable data would have previous knowledge about what he’s claiming, which is a small margin of people because the government has marginalized the topic since the 40’s. It’s “quackery.” He’s very articulate and tries to be really careful about what he communicates, but I think it was just human imperfection when he contradicted himself by pointing out how these craft often intervene with nuclear missiles and hang around nuclear power plants, and then said they are probably neutral in opinion when it comes to human affairs. Maybe what he meant was that they don’t want us to wipe ourselves out, but other than that they’ll observe indifferently on the evil we being upon ourselves and each other. Also, when he was talking about their possible origins, it seemed to me more like speculation of what could be rather than assuming what is. I’ve heard him say in a few other interviews that it’s really hard to gauge their intent, and I’ve heard him speculate on many theories on their origin. One last note: he has Asperger’s. He talks about that in one of the other interviews I’ve seen him in. I mention that because I wonder if that gives you more insight to his communication habits, and if it does, it could be that I’ve gotten the wrong impression of him.

Totally agree with this video from beginning to end. No serious information was leaked and who is pulling his strings cause someone made sure he couldn't or he doesn't know to cross the line. And in my opinion there are think tanks soooo much better to investigate than some silos.

I believe that he's telling what he believes is the truth, and he really feels important to be telling this truth of his, and he prides himself on appearing to be a stand up truthful credible person

I think he’s telling the truth but he also doesn’t have firsthand experience of seeing aliens or crafts. Circumstantial evidence is really strong here as well as his credibility as a witness. His sense of belonging to his country and the government is why he respects not to disclose classified information. Also he doesn’t want to get in criminal or legal trouble for saying too much. The fact that someone like him would risk his sense of belonging to speak the truth is actually pretty admirable.

If he is a true whistleblower with any kind of evidence, he'd be arrested a long time ago, or at the very least threatened. There's very little credibility in this story. I wonder wtf this story is supposed to distract us from though.

Yes! I think you are spot on with your analysis! He is part of something, and was " allowed" to release certain information. I also agree that he is a loyal party of something, and believes what he is saying...as vague as it was. He does not have the righteous anger of a whistle-blower, that usually feels they need protection.

when he's doing the hand motions when he's saying each word "non human exotic vehicles" those are words that he either practiced saying and are hard to articulate for him (cuz he does have a bit of a lisp) and also from the congressional hearing he repeated " I prefer the term non human " versus extra terrestrial, I believe the hand movements with each word just helps him say words that are either difficult for him or words he himself feels strongly about that should be used instead of another word.

This is the most detailed, informative and well-explain reading I’ve watched. Subscribing!

The only thing, I wanna know is ... Are the Aliens , voting Democrat or Republican.

Do an episode about identifying emotions from text (i.e comments, emails, letters, text messages) and varying levels of formality.

Hey Spidey, Bigfoot and I watched this one together and we enjoyed it, as always! 😅👍🎩 PS, I agree that he tends to come off like a high ranking, very bright car salesman. "What do I need to do to get you into this spaceship today?!" Also, that need to belong and be a part of a group could possibly be due to him being on the spectrum, as I am. I'm not certain, but I'm seeing a few cues of divergence.

Yup ..what you said at 9:40 about belonging rings true to what i personally know. My grandfather was CMSAF and an orphan at 4. He worked his tail off to become high ranking in his brotherhood - the military.

Brilliant assessment, it does sound like concerted effort to ease people into the idea that there are aliens beings and we should be united in that knowledge…so I’d say he’s a plant from the government trying to prepare people for what’s to come

Now this is the analysis we need.

Great video! My feelings about this is that it is very difficult for me to see him both as a whistle blower and also someone who is sent to do this and is controlled by the people he is supposedly exposing at the same time. it is because, as you showed, he seems to believe in what he is doing, and so if he had come with a mission to bluff and manipulate it would contradict with the honesty which he is showing. Also, in the end he really has got nothing. He hasn’t seen aliens or their vehicles in person, just heard about them, second or third hand, pretty much like the rest of us. so maybe he was let go or something, and now he wants to be a part of something bigger, like America or the human community.

I think you nailed it with “belonging”. The actual complaint to his higher ups is that he is out of an investigative loop that he feels he should belong to. They are taking his Human Resources complaint seriously! That’s all this is. He knows nothing and nothing has been revealed. Lots of fun for media and theorists though.

I totally agree with your observations. In fact, it reminds me of that classic episode on The Outer Limits: The Architects of Fear.

Hey Spidey! The two things that got my attention was, that Dave was smiling a lot during his interview, and also wondering what did Dave gain by coming forward with his story? Anyway, I wanted to say Thank you for covering Dave's interview. I found that the whole ordeal was quite interesting to say the least!!

Love this channel. I've been watching you since the Amber Heard trial. Very exciting and insightful content. Brilliant work.

I like the levitating bulb right behind him :D

To me, “Belonging” sounds like a sales pitch from him to receive sympathy.

I believe this guy. The occasional vague answers make sense. He obviously has talked with lawyers. Sharing exact numbers or technical details could get you in trouble down the road.