I’ve recently purchased the REL 98 Classic. It’s my first ever sub and I have to say it’s been one of the best upgrades I’ve made to my system. They were on offer for a limited time at £999 around Christmas time and I honestly think is been worth every penny. I have a relatively modest system which to me now sounds incredible with the REL in play. My system is Naim Uniti Nova & Sonus Faber Minima Amator 11. Needless to say the Bass now goes lower, it’s fuller but without bleeding into the mids. It’s hard to describe but the soundstage seems bigger, more enveloping. It’s also added a touch of extra body and depth to my system but without sacrificing any details. Absolute result. Very happy owner 👍😊
Great its does wonders indeed. If you take the sub away you cant go back to the old situation. Then you know you're on the right way. Enjoy and never sell it.
Two words. BK electronics. They made Subs for REL from the 90s onwards, and now sell their own direct to the public. Great designs, real furniture grade wood veneers, good drivers, high and low level inputs, come with excellent cables....and cost half the equivalent REL sub. Also fantastic customer service. And if you buy more than one they will match the veneers. I have no connection to the company, but own four of their subs and think they are fantasric value.
@@gregsmall8774 I certainly recommend them. I have their monster Monolith Plus in my AV system, twin Double Gems in my main stereo setup and an XLS 200 in my upstairs small room setup. If I was buying again for my main system, I would probably go for twin xxls 400, but at the time the double gem with twin 10 inch drivers each, fitted the taller, narrower, form factor I wanted. If you phone them they will usually be able to advise what would work best for your needs. Good luck. Once you add a sub (or two ) you never go back. I now have floorstanders with twin 10 inch drivers each, but I still prefer to use the Double Gems as well.
I’ve never used subs in my system, until that is 6 years ago when I extensively toured my local bricks and mortar dealers looking to upgrade my floorstanders and one dealer introduced me to the enhanced musical enjoyment of having subs in your system. My hifi has to fight for its right to be in our 21 feet by 18 feet by 7.5 feet lounge. So persuading the aesthetics committee, AKA the wife to accept the addition of subs was, an all out battle. As was the struggle between positioning for best sonic performance and discrete aesthetics. My floorstanders are 108 inches apart, measured from the front centre of each cabinet. My T9X subs sit on the inside edge of each floorstander and are barely visible as my purpose built media cabinet is positioned between the subs. Surprisingly it works well on 2 levels. It appeases the wife and works sonically, although I’m certain there are more sonically beneficial positions. More recently I’ve added a 3rd T9X to my system. Located centrally close to the rear wall, or the wall behind the listening position. After dialling in all 3 subs, to a point where they’re barely ticking over, I’ve achieved a superbly smooth and even bass distribution which blends seamlessly with my main speakers. More recently, one of my 4 year old single ended monoblocks died. So both have been sent to a local audio doctor to be put right. So, I’m currently employing a balanced stereo power amp to drive my system: I’ve had to disconnect the subs. Connecting subs using the high level connection with a balanced amp is a recipe for disaster and as this a temporary arrangement I’ve not bothered to use the low level connectors. What this experience has shown me though is just how good my floorstanders are, unaided.
I have the rel strata 5. I bought this new in the 90s and it’s been used pretty much every day since. It’s the only piece of kit that has stayed with me over the years, and not been subject to “upgradeitis”. Back in the day it was for av use but in recent times as my speakers have become smaller I use it more when 2 channel music listening. A great nod to rel on the sustainability front and just shows quality kit is worth the price.
Dusted off my My Musical Fidelity 1 Final Edition and Castle Chesters after a hiatus of 20 years. They traveled across the Atlantic pond with me and I am so glad I held on to them. Besides being able to warm my hands on the amp last month, it brought on waves of nostalgia. Like you Tarun, this kit was acquired in the 90's. It was the best that I could afford then. But now the Castles sound anemic in the lower frequency department. (Yes, my spelling has been forcibly Americanized) I am not sure if it is my hearing or my inability to find a spot for the speakers against a wall. So your sub videos have come at an opportune time. I wrote to REL asking for a match to my amp/speaker and behold, they replied. T5X they said for my kit and room. I know I have opened Pandora's box. After so many years busy with other priorities like raising a family, I find myself with time to enjoy the finer things in life. Hi Fi is like Stone Soup, isn't it. And I will enjoy the journey as well as the destination if there is such a thing as a destination. I will probably end up replacing everything, one bit at a time. So what do you think of my first move. Many thanks for your though provoking videos.
A sub really helps with speakers that are lacking in low bass. I recently got a second one exactly the same model I already had. I put them inside to my left and right speakers. Even more immersive. You can run them at lower levels when you have 2 so you get more overhead.
I have 2 REL 5x subs to go with my alchris ar10 speakers I love the results I get its totally changed my set up , It’s just more listenable nice and relaxing and very comfortable like a pair off old slippers.
Tarun, I have you to thank for my REL T5x. Would never have bought it otherwise as I thought it was a betrayal of the “stereo” pursuit. At the end of the day, my pursuit is enjoyment of music. The DALI Menuet SE nudged me towards the REL. The DALI’s sing beautifully the mids and highs but lacked in the lows. The REL taught me that a sub need only fill the void without changing what I love about the DALIs. Long speech but still understates the improvement and realisation that the sub brought. My question to you - would dual subs make it better? John Darko think so.
Great review, I’ve never had a good stereo without subs , yes a pair, I tried one sub once but couldn’t live with it, mind you I’m not a huge bass fan but what it brings to soundstage and midrange is what I like most.
Thank you, Tarun for the best sub review I've seen/read. Your general comments about subwoofers hit all the salient points. In my little room, stand mount speakers are the only viable alternative. After much consideration, I added a sub to the system. The result was a wider, deeper and yes taller soundstage. On recordings which contain information about the recording venue, there are clearly more clues about that venue. My advice, for what it's worth, would be to at least audition a sub if you're using stand mounts.
Thanks for the review Tarun. A good musical subwoofer has never been cheap (despite the internet pushing cheap ones), but it is an investment that can serve you for years if you choose correctly. The review between the three REL models was informative. 🙂
So since my speakers are out in my room a couple feet from the wall, I moved my entertainment center out and put the sub behind the entertainment center. That placed the sub middle of my room and middle of my speakers and it blends so well! The KC62 by Kef sounds amazing if you have not used it I recommend giving it a try.
As always a very good review. I have been using the same Definitive Technology Powerfield 1500 sub for nearly 30 years. It is a 15" sealed box with a 250 WRMS Class AB built in amp. I use the high level input/output as the unit has a great 36dB per octave low-pass x-over from 50-100Hz and a 12dB High-pass. I agree with you that a good sub, well integrated does improve the sound stage and the overall performance of a system. BTW, I have played Gleneagles Kings course. Wow!
Thank you. I look my dad to Gleneagles for his birthday. We had a great couple of days. The Queen’s course is beautiful. We were lucky you play the Kings course just before a European ladies tour event. The condition was something to behold 😊👍
I always enjoy your very thoughtful and precise reviews! Thanks for your insight! Reminds my me of my younger days reading the audio magazines! Best to you, sir!
Thank you for your review Tarun - I have been very happy with my REL S/5, even when combined with larger ATC 50 tower speakers. Yes, I went for the Umik mic too, and eventually came to a nearfield position, about 1m 25 from my seat. I was also surprised when finding a position just moving your head forward and back from the main speakers can make a low frequency suddenly almost disappear - when checking the physics, it became less surprising of course.
As a Rel owner I enjoyed the comparison video. Thanks for sharing the Adam Ben Ezra track for exercising the lower octaves. One that I've enjoyed and is my current go to is Brian Bromberg's All Blues.
I have recently purchased a pair of REL S510 subs to compliment my Apogee Duetta Signature Ribbon speakers after evaluating a single S510 before purchase. I am using a pair of ARC VM220 mono block valve amps fed by an Ayon CD5S DAC using Tidal. The results were simply transformational with improvements to soundstage (increase) sound cohesion and above all enjoyment of the "missing" lower register. Well recorded electronic music often provides deep rhythmic bass and the REl's are able to fully convey texture as well as low bass notes. The S 510 integrate very well with the Apogees and couldn't be happier. These were quite expensive but I needed subs that could keep up with the speed of the Apogees. I can honestly confirm the marketing claims from REL's John Hunter are true. And it's very hard to step back when you remove the subs! PS a pair of subs is worth the extra money!
I have a pair of REL T5. Love the sound, hate the looks. Hifi is a game of compromises and a good sub or two can mitigate some of those compromises. Stand mount speakers have fantastic imaging and staging but lack punch, dynamics, and a low frequencies. Klipsch Heresy is a very live sounding, dynamic speaker that sounds amazing with low powered tube amps but lacks low end grunt. With my JBL L112s and Spendor S8e's the subs open up the stage a little but I don't really need them. Now I just use the JBLs without subs and I'm totally happy. As a fan of vintage speakers and real wood veneers, I wish the Classic 98' had been around when I invested in my subs.
Nice review. Thx. I use 2 REL Q150 Mk2 and they are nearby eatch speaker (Harbets SHL5+). They make a huge improvement overall the sound. More sound stage, way better low end obviously and medium /high have a little more texture. They are powered via a wifi plug (alexa), so I can switch them on an off with a word. Those old sub are not that fast but they do a very nice job to my ears. And they go deeeeeep (19khz).
Great review. For me I love how the sub brings out the first octave. Fuller and meatier sound. My sub is a sealed direct servo 12” from GR research of Texas. Same as Rythmik. Faster controlled sound. Umph enough. Would like to install a DSP-something that with an active microphone would change the gain, depending on choice of genre of music. Jazz, pop, rock or electronic music.
My experience and use of a sub was transformative. Even with speakers that have great base performance and extension, I just can’t listen now and enjoy as much without a sub. I have a high pass set up with a REL T5x and a few stand mounts I alternate. I have enjoyed the synergy and soundstage it brings most of all. The new Buchardt sub is something want to try out as well. Thanks for another outstanding review.
nice review. In my set up I have been using 2× REL Storm III in a stereo configuration for years. I have a fairly large listening room and the T9x didn't do what I wanted to hear. I missed the warmth and fullness using the T series, which were certainly not bad, but I was also disappointed by the questionable appearance. Over the years I have replaced the standard cables with better ones. Recently, both Storms have a new amazing sound thanks to Stack Audio's Auva speaker isolators. It's amazing what these feet do with speakers. Living without REL Subs is almost impossible now.
Hi Tarun. An excellent review. I have a REL Quake with my KEF Q5’s & I can’t imagine going subless in the future. Everything sounds better…. throughout the entire sonic range and it does this on all types of music. I can’t enjoy music in my current system without my sub🎵🎶😎
Subs are underestimated! I use 2 small B&W subs. One at the side wall and one at the speaker wall. Like this there are less mods all over the room (rather big open 90m2). Also the crossover frequency is low (less than 45Hz), and the gain low as well, as I am using a 2way florstander from ProAc. I find, just when you begin to hear the sub, is about right… However the gain in musicality is all worth it! 😃
Four pairs of vertically stacked Quad ELS 57s need help below 80 Hz, a quarter wave stereo transmission line subwoofer that utilises the new version of the KEF B139 (200 W handling) does a fine job. The subwoofer cabinet is the coffin design from the T-line speakers website, a home built LPF takes care of the filtering.
I have a dedicated room in my basement that serves double duty as a home theater and a stereo listening space. I have 3 REL HT series subs which were calibrated via Dirac live. I should mention I also have 2 Martin Logan subs also calibrated by Dirac, my JBL Synthesis processor can independently cal 5 subs. All 5 are sealed. They do a great job of integrating lf that is clean and tight for home theater and music.
I have only ever used one subwoofer. A Beolab 2 paired with my Beolab 8000 speakers. It transformed the system and can't imagine not having it. Its not like others I have heard as part of an AV system, one does not even notice its presence until it is not being used. As others have found, it enables the main speakers to work better as the small drivers in the 8000s do not have to work so hard at moving low frequency air. (The Beolabs have both high and low pass filters to enable this). Like you, I chose to place the sub away from the corner of the room and it lives between the 8000s, away from the wall. Probably my neighbours in the apartment below are grateful. For all that it is not an AV device, when watching movies with a lot of low frequency energy and effects, it does make my sofa move and it does have an effect on my body cavities. So yes, if asked, I would always recommend using an appropriate subwoofer in a HiFi system.
Hi Sir, I have an older sub, not REL, but it does great justice to the overall music and soundscape, no doubt about it! I am planning this next month to purchase either 2 REL t5 x’s or 2 Rythmic L12’s. Both same price but the Rythmic use Servo controlled drivers and the amp section has a ton of controls over the REL’s. I will audition both. I have a well treated but small room 10’ by 12’. It’s all about the room!!!
As always, a great review, thank you. As for your question about our experiences, I'm forced to place my sub in the very corner of the room close to the right speaker. I was shocked how directional the sub is, despite it being set up to 40Hz crossover with 24dB slope. It's so easy to locate the sub sound and the sound is completely out of balance. I can't go any lower in terms of crossover because I have a huge dip at 40Hz with my speakers the way they're positioned (hence the sub). I spent countless hours with Room EQ Wizard and even Dirac Live, to no avail. Beware, sub placement is no picnic.
I got the Adam Audio T10s sub to complement my T5v studio monitors. I enjoyed the clarity of the T5vs but missed the bass weight of PMC FB1s I used to own. This sub puts it back making the 5 inch speakers sound much bigger. The sound can quickly be ruined if you turn the gain up too far causing boom but keep it at 25 percent or so it is good. A welcome upgrade.
When I get my main speakers EQed in the room, I’ll think about adding sub-woofers to my two channel setup. I have one connected to my AV receiver and it is great for special effects. I have had great difficulty integrating subs with my full range speakers, and usually wind up using the lowest possible crossover point at very low volume so as not to distort the music by adding a ‘bass-head’ feel to it. Neither do I like ported cabinets as my room shakes at their resonant frequency. Sealed cabinets deliver the bass sound that I prefer.
Hey Tarun ' I use to use active subs ' with 2 channel stereo but my rooms have been small and I get these crazy bass Nulls and phase/timing is so tuff to get 💯 So I would keep the volume very low of active sub now ' I am more into tower speakers that can get down to 30hz in room Bass (Dynaudio) thanks Tarun always a joy ! 😊
@mike_lowndes almost done with my video review of emit 50s they go down to a conservative 30hz ! Addicted to audio (webpage) measured below 25hz in room Bass ' dynaudio builds some crazy bass woofers and yeah for rooms smaller than 15ftx20ft I would reccomend Emit 30s !
I use 2 REL HT- 1508's for my great room. One is in the sweet spot the other is set in corner for the max bass. Both are set at the 9 O'clock volume position and one can not hear them unless they hit a room resonance which is around 32HZ. Listening room one at PS Audio uses one in the back.
Thank you for another very useful and thought-provoking review. I am looking to replace my old Rel Strata 5 with a fast single or pair of subs to accompany Magneplanar 1.7i speakers. I am also underwhelmed by the lack of natural wood finishes although note the ATC C1 and B&W BD-D range are exceptions. It would be interesting to hear your assessment of one of these subs or maybe the Monitor Audio Anthra series, especially any of these with the 10 or 12 inch drivers which are claimed to be fast. For any Magnepan owners, it really is worthwhile trying the speakers through a high pass filter, say 100Hz depending on the crossover slope, and a sub(s) on a low pass output. This is really interesting and seems to reveal yet more detail in the midrange as a result of the speaker producing less low base. My Parasound amp has 12dB/octave (shallow roll off) filters; experimenting with these has been quite an education including using sub test tones from RU-vid. This arrangement also stops the ‘buzz’ in one of 1.7i speakers (a fault at 40-50Hz sometimes experienced but not audible on many recordings). Set on the usual high level input, the Strata 5 just spoils the base from the Magnepans as one might expect…..so the T7x is very interesting.
Ok well you asked for it lol. For many years I had a single Eclipse TD316 SW in the system. I got this pretty cheap in the late nineties. At this point I’d abandoned ‘hi-fi’ for an AVR so it was mostly for booms when watching fillums. When my kids grew up and work became less full on I came back to hi-fi (about 10 years ago) and got a decent amp. I liked the sound of the Eclipse but they don’t go very loud at only 60W. Luckily I found another one on fleabay- so now I have two running in ‘stereo’ which I highly recommend. That’s still only 120w overall but as others have said SWs are best in tickover mode adding subtle depth and this they do really well in our 4x3.5 meter lounge (which is open at both ends so no reflective side walls). Room correction is done in Roon and now they have FIR it’s very effective (to the point that I am considering an A/D converter to get my turntable into the digital domain! Sacrilege!) Eclipse engineering and design as you know is amazing but idiosyncratic. These have a very innovative upwards firing design and look a bit sci fi, but are small enough to be hidden behind furniture in the corners of the room (they are almost impossible to find these days and few want such low power SWs. Eclipse abandoned the design for the Mk2 version which was a standard black box). While the hi-fi has to share space with A/V I won’t be changing. If I get a dedicated music room at some point I might consider ‘upgrading’.
My REL Stampede is still going strong after several decades of use and still gives my sound the benefits a sub brings. However despite the improvements a modern design bring to the party, I still like that I can tune in my Stampede with the supplied remote control. Pity the new designs don’t offer this facility.
I think it’s fair to say that by any metric the T7/9x are considered the best SQL subs ever made for their price bracket. I haven’t heard them all but I’ve heard a lot - and this is widely held logic in reviewer land. Therefore by your specific metric (and to support the belief that a subwoofer is the most impactful upgrade you can EVER make to your system for the money), the T7x should be considered for outstanding classification. Also you didn’t mention the specific track by Adam Ben Ezra 😂 - assuming just the excellent pin drop album. Great review as always, and yes more subwoofer content (both specific coverage and including their influence in other equipment reviews) are always welcome.
Very informative thanks for posting Tarun. I have pair of Strata 111’s in one room and a pair of Strata 5 in another. For me no system is complete without a sub and two is definitely better than 1 (as per YuengsNwings comment). Even my large floor standers benefit from subs its not just a case of using them with small stand mounts. Other than a failed LCD display failure on one of the 5’s the vintage models have been very reliable. I would love to try a more modern (faster) REL but I am always hearing about reliability issues with modern China produced RELS.
I'm running two Rel Stampedes with my Mission V63 and never liked the sound when putting them on the corners. Using REW and its simulator I ended with one on the back left corner and the other one at about 38% of the right side wall. Crossover at 40hz and volume at 45.
I use REL subs in all my systems - discretely Use 5 in my main system Not for blast but for full range sonic integrity A great solo piano recording resonates in the space of the recorded venue and my room The subs crossover starting from where the main speakers run out Volume of the sub set also to believable level to bring out both power and detail You want a base drum to thump thrillingly but still sit with the other instruments in space
For the 1st time in 20 years I popped into a HiFi shop, and was looking at many of the smaller speakers and subs, I am not too fond of the branding and logo's on the Rel. On one model it looks like a cabinet handle on the side. These classic models are visually more appealing, but we now have this preference for two subs, and the larger classic will be great if you are wanting it to sit somewhere looking like furniture, but may well not be so straightforward if your after dual subs simply due to height. Still struggling with what direction to take myself after 20 years of hifi being in storage. Certainly a lot more WAF options available these days.
I agree about the REL finishing options, the gloss black/white with a ridiculous amount of logo's is horrible and when a manufacturer releases a classic/vintage version it is 9/10 walnut 🙈 nothing wrong with walnut except when you live in scandinavian oak interior 😅 Luckely I´m not in the market for a sub because they drove me mad 🤯 but more finishing options should be available in 2024 for REL, Wharfedale, KLH, Mission, Revival........
I have a sub placed directly behind the listening position in a TV/Living room set up. I have found that time alignment is more important for sub placement that phase adjustment and to try to place the sub approximately the same distance from the listening position as the main speakers for seamless blending. Thanks for the review Tarun.
Here is my list of useful things for sub woofer performance and integration. Extremely well braced cabinets, cast iron speaker baskets, variable phase control, and 1/3 octave EQ from 20to 120 Hz. Ability to play relatively flat up to 300 Hz minimum, enough power to deal with three second peaks. This is my criteria for both audiophile and pro sound reinforcement. On the audiophile usage I have found benefits of using hi level inputs and subs from the amps output, not night and day, but a difference. No sound processor can solve all problems within a room, specially a difficult room. Usually my max boost is 3 db and cuts in frequency 6 db. The best I ever made was a transmission line, which would be ridiculously expensive for a manufacture to market. Cheers from montreal. Where it is snowy and cold right now.😂. Oh thanks for a well done review.
Good review. I just hooked up a SVS micro3000 to my Proacs and enjoy the new found bottom end. That said, It's hard to do an exciting subwoofer review. When I see most of them I feel like I do when one of my wife's old women friends pull out the pictures of their grandkids. I wonder which one is an incipient school shooter.
Hello, i did enjoy your excellent video. I have owned a Strata and traded up to a (used)Stadium 2. Although it works well and has good integration its getting older and I wonder if it isn't as good as a newer one. I'm like you and not keen on the new look so your research has been very interesting for me. Thank You.
I have an old (but great) system that has Audiolab 8000A pre-amp with two (100W) 8000P stereo power amps individually bi-amped to my gorgeous Mission 754F, three way jobs. These speakers have competent bass extension anyway. They system has plenty of SPL reserve in my listening room. With a budget of £500 I bought two e-bay KEF KHT2005.2 (10 inch) subwoofers and threw away the integral amps as they run hot then die. I replaced with two (nominally) 250W class D sub amplifiers on the basis that they do not need a fraction of this power but unstressed components sound better IMO. Each 754 sits on top of the sub. The volume and crossover are set low and this allows the bass of the 754's to breath but subtly augmented by the subs. Older source material tends to convey deep bass in mono (if at all) but modern electronic has stereo separation all the way down. I do think that two is better than one and I have to say the Class D amps are very fast, create low sounds that you can feel without fuss or ridiculous reverberation and they stay incredibly cool even when working hard. Cannot say if this compares anyway near proper £££ kit but it has enhanced my listening experience, particularly in the synth and sampling space - Metronomy, Aphex, Martyn Bennet, Underworld, Stanley Clarke, and the list goes on... I mention all of this because you can get those KEF subs on e-bay for pennies. The amp will be dead or will die on you (known design "feature") but if the speaker isn't ripped £30 to £50 is good for it and a well made enclosure. I think I picked up the class D amps on Amazon for £150 each.
I've paired Classic 98's with my walnut-veneered KEF R11 Metas, connecting the high level inputs at the binding posts, in my impeccably appointed -- if I do say so myself -- very large, multi-purpose room. I stream CD-quality or hi-res jazz and classical via a BlueSound Node (130) connected by optical cable to a Denafrips Pontus II, which in turn feeds a NAD M23 through XLR cables. Perhaps the T/x series would perform better at the margins, but black or white wouldn't cut it appearance-wise in such a statement space, while the sonic result of pairing the slightly warm subs with the revealing KEFs is quite pleasant, at least to my ears. The biggest issue these days is the number of poor quality recordings this system lays bare.
Thank you very much for these videos, they are very useful and interesting for those of us who do not know in depth what to choose and why. A question if you allow me: what is your opinion of the Canton Crhono 502.3 desktop speakers? thank you so much, regards from México.
Nice review. I want one! Btw I think your 4.35 comment is inaccurate. Wiki: "Passive radiators are used instead of a *reflex port* for several reasons. In small-volume enclosures tuned to low frequencies, the length of the required port becomes very large. They are also used to reduce or eliminate the objectionable noises of port turbulence and compressive flow caused by high-velocity airflow in small ports. In addition, ports have pipe resonances that can produce undesirable effects on the frequency response. To a first-order approximation, the passive radiator works identically to a port." (Sorry) Cheers matey 🎵🤫🎵
I have a REL T9/X in my system today and prefer it placed slightly off the corner of one of the front walls. Right in the corner just provided too much boom for me.
My experience with using a subwoofer: Two is better than one. I put mine (2x REL T/7x) inside the stereo pair of speakers. Tried one sub first, but adding a second one makes it so much easier to find a good setting and even out room modes. If you can afford the looks and space, go for it.
Arguably, one of the most important features of a sub is the ability to adjust phase. Unlike others, such as Rythmik, REL is a 0 or 180 phase choice. This ties the hands of many people trying to integrate their sub into spaces which require more flexibility. Why is REL so primitive in this regard? I tried for years to get my REL R-328 to work in my room, but the lack of phase adjustment was the issue.
I don’t follow your logic. Having only a 180 switchable phasing removes the need for other adjustments. It’s one or the other. There’s no variance as far as I understand. Interested to learn more if there’s more complexity than that
@@TheDjcarlos67 Variable phase is best, as you can adjust in steps and set what is best, either through your ears or with REW. My Monoprice subs have variable phase.
I feel variable phase would make positioning easier for people who really know what they are doing. RELs view is that it will just make integration more difficult for the majority of their customers 😊
The better bang for your buck is to spread the cost of one premium sub across two less expensive subs. Adding a second sub is transformative for smoothing out bass response in a room. While peaks can be tamed with EQ, nothing can be done about nulls other than adding a second sub. Just like not being able to go back after adding one sub, you can’t go back after adding your second. If you’ve got $1000 to spend on a sub, better to get two $500 subs and it’s not even a close comparison. I have a pair of B&W ASW608’s that are $600 apiece and they obliterate the performance of the $1500 B&W ASW10CM in every room I’ve used them in.
Its good that you are putting out this message. I have not done the 2 versus 1 comparison but in two separate room systems its always been better when I added a second sub. I think thats common knowledge now but i guess few will have done the 2 x 500 versus 1 x 1000 test at home.
umm, no "To a first-order approximation, the passive radiator works identically to a port. Passive radiators are tuned by mass variations (Mmp), changing the way that they interact with the compliance of the air in the box."
Wonder how the T7X or Classic '98 compares to a Stadium III. Have mine in Rosewood new since 2003 still going strong. Shame REL offers no woodfinish anymore.
How about break in? I remember first time I ran my rel I had to place it in the middle of the room or it sounded boomy. After some time I could move it to the wall. Easier to setup an better bass performance from a sub and bookshelf then from a big 3-way. Where you not in search for new speakers? Seems you almost change the whole system but the proacs are still there 😂
Hi Tarun. It's almost as if you have peeked at my hifi wishlist. Right now, I am looking for a music sub to compliment my GR-Research X-LS Encores. The REL T5x and the Classic 98 are on that list. I was wondering about detail retrieval between the T-series and Classic 98. Other than warmth and transients, are there differences in the amount of information in the lower regions, like vibration of strings and ambient details? I am not the most analytical listener, but details add to the enveloping nature of music, which I love so much. My first choice was Rythmik FM8's, but with shipping costs from the US and reports of humming (sometimes) when using a 240 watt power supply is deterring me a bit. Albeit, rumors say that they make some of the best subwoofers for music. Is Rythmik one of the brands you were thinking of?
Thanks Roy. Rhythmic is a brand worth exploring. In the UK BK Electronics have some good valve alternatives to classic RELs. In fact they used to make them for a spell many years ago 🙂
@@abritishaudiophile7314 Great suggestion. The Double Gem looks like something I'd like. Buchardts Sub 10 will soon be released and looks quite interesting also. Cheers.
Ive a couple of items from MCRU. just wondering which type of power block you went for, as I've got the silver version of your block. But after another one with a better cable. Also where did you get your RCA cables from because I cant find the with WBT connectors
Hello Tarun thank you for the informative video, I myself am playing with two subwoofers of the open baffle principle after Axel Ridthaler they are very low on efficiencie but very fast and open and they go verry low. Because there are two of them they define the recording space very accurate i think that is an great advantage i wonder did you ever try the use of two subwoofers?
Hi Tarun, REL have advised me that the t7 is ideal for my Exposure 3010 Pre, Monos and room size, so i'm on the look out for 1. other than that I would like to upgrade my Emit 20s to Special 40s
@@abritishaudiophile7314 picked up a t7x on Saturday. It's sounding great so far I'm hearing lower notes than I did with my out-going Paradigm sub. I used the advice from the REL support web page. I'll put some more time in to the tweaking.
I haven't compared many subs but did manage to listen to some current REL models in decent setups. I couldn't agree more, @1:28, REL's branding is very showy. It puts me off. But with many fashion labels using their logos as the only visually distinctive design element, I guess this practice is a sign of our times...
I am interested in a sub solely for the gains in soundstage depth, but worry about being able to "hear" it, ie it not completely integrating with my system. Does placement in the room also affect soundstage quality, or only bass extension?
Excellent insights and overall review - I would love any REL sub, modern or 'vintage to compliment my 2 ch. music system (fan of wharfedale and harbeths) P.s. still rockin' a Mirage Omni S8 More so For tv and cinema these days... Accurate, clean, tight, fast punchy, does the job! Thanks mate!
