'Are You Both Conspiracy Theorists...?': Malliotakis Grills Scientists Over Covid Lab-Leak Theory 

this kind of thing threatens their paychecks. It threatens their livelihood. It threatens their way on how to do things. If it came from the lab and NOT a wet market (perfectly reasonable possibility) then the people who work in the lab are responsible for 5 million deaths and we paid them our tax dollars to kill 5 million people and to wreck all our lives for at least 2 years. They will do everything they possibly can to avoid that level of accountability. That is why it MUST be a wet market. Then, we can just blame the culture of the Chinese and the way they live. China will not be cutting the earth a check to compensate the earth for the ruin that they did should it be a wet market. Me personally? I would say that God only knows the true origin.

Yeah sounds familiar. Like Fauci openly lying and saying they didn't fund gain of function (then trying to change its very definition after.)

Similar situation regarding lead too.

@@ideapowerfulweapon Yup. Lead in petrol was completely harmless ...... Of course. 🤣

the same thing that happened to Hillary Clinton will happen to them, NOTHING

And swiftly dispatched upon a guilty verdict.

Medical opinion does not override research evidence. Medical opinion follows correlational data that forms medical practice.

At one point in time they would have. Right now, laws are not being enforced, unless they are against those with "wrong think". In my 48 yrs I have never seen anything like this disaster going on right now in our Nation.

@@denisevarner7308 you mean like the “scientific evidence” that Covid occurred naturally? Or that Covid research was not being paid for by the NIH? Or that the Tuskegee Syphilis experiments were to help 900+ blacks by treating their syphilis. You mean THAT scientific evidence?

Well so far "Conspiracy Theorist" have a 36-0 record of being right so....

A lie has speed, but the truth has endurance.

nine 11

In reality there are no "conspiracy theories." That is a term used to shut down fact finding and healthy discourse based upon conflicting evidence not personal opinion.

It's called "Spoiler Alerts" now

Onlyfans girls gotta survive somehow

Just like these climate "experts."

That's it if you know history you understand what's happening. History is repeating itself. Many people believe these news agencies because they don't know history. Propaganda media is always part of a government overthrow.

Well said. Observe the patterns and one sees the vicious circular movement and reasoning.

Puzzle solver!

The art of connecting life events

"Poe imagines the situation in which a sailor, who has gone out on a fishing expedition, finds himself caught in a huge maelstrom or whirlpool. He sees that his boat will be sucked down into this thing In order to survive, the sailor looks around and studies the action of the storm. He observes patterns and recognizes them for what they are. Sometimes things appear. Sometimes things disappear. By carefully noting the reality of certain recurring patterns, he is able to infer what is needed for his survival. He grabs hold of what does not disappear. He hangs on to what he reasonably thinks can carry him out of the storm. He trusts a proven pattern of salvation that he was able to observe. And eventually he is saved. Pattern recognition in the midst of a huge, overwhelming, destructive force is the way out of the maelstrom. The huge vortices of energy created by our media present us with similar possibilities of evasion or consequences of destruction. By studying the patterns of the effects of this huge vortex of energy in which we are involved, it may be possible to program a strategy of evasion and survival.” - Marshall McLuhan

well, i'm glad you at least recognize that your conspiracy theories are counter to science. next, i'd suggest you work on your counting skills.

@@miles6910 "Science" Right, and the score is very accurate.

@@miles6910leftists don’t use science. That’s abundantly clear. They use fear and emotion. Fact.

They don’t know how to get women without using money - this is why losers sellout and play the whole “jus doin muh jawb” bs. It’s time an example be made of beta males specific to government employment. If I had the funds - I’d pay women to divorce government employees in droves. Leave those stupid beta males divorced paying alimony for life 😀

Yes i bring that up also, and there weren't any deaths from 2021 or 2022 good job.

Been 3 years and no flu's or cold's. Strange isnt it?

Yah I brought this up to my lib friend ( a nurse btw) and she said because people weren't going out and everyone was wearing a mask. So I said, then how were they getting covid? That was the end of the convo.

Just wait until the Wuhan lab gets another NIH grant through Eco-alliance to do pseudo-typing experiments on the newly discovered Avian Influenza variant A(H5N1). There will be flu!

@@IRaoulDuke Brilliant

They both need throw in jail. Blatant lies.

😂😂😂

I was in awe of it...

All they have to do is say "Science says," and that convinces the Democrats.

@@pollychase6099 "Experts say" and "studies show" are other phrases I've learned to be red flags for some hot propaganda.

@@youtubecensors5419 certainly beats "i saw it on youtube" or "i read it on twitter".

@@pollychase6099Science says there are only two genders.

She asked him what happened why his opinion changed in the period of a three days, he said that he found “new” evidence from the “ literature “ that virus is naturally occurred. Lol his article was the only literature published about Covid virus. My question also why Malokakus on this committee since she neither a doctor nor scientist etc. she has BA in art or something . Where is Rand Paul

Not a single person will face consequences for any of this.

The truth is a flawless crystalline matrix, due to the law of non-contradiction. Ideas that are false cannot be joined to the matrix of truth -- the crystal rejects all flaws -- this is the fundamental nature of 'reality'. If multiple things start 'adding up', using known facts and propositional logic, then a theory is far more likely to be true, than false (because it's coherent with reality).

@@hxhdfjifzirstc894right on. I dig that. Where can I read more?!

@@mrwojna Well, start by envisioning a self-evident truth as a node in a crystal lattice. If you perform any valid logical transformation on that known truth, you will arrive at a new valid node in this matrix, which necessarily connects to the rest of the crystal due to the law of non-contradiction (something that is true can never contradict something else that is true). If it were not so, then reality would contradict itself, and there would be only chaos (my beer would be cold, but also it could be warm, which is incoherent). If a theory is actually true, then the theory cannot contradict any known real facts, even as new facts are discovered. For example, let's say the local DA has a theory that you killed your neighbor... but it's a provable fact that you were in another state on the day he was killed. The DA's theory MUST be false. On the other hand, if you really did kill your neighbor, you will find it impossible to come up with any real facts that prove you are innocent. So we have two patterns to recognize, for evaluating theories... true theories will be coherent with facts as they are discovered, and untrue theories will lack any facts that prove they are true (by logical necessity). I wish I knew where to read about this subject, because I also want to study it. I can only suggest that you take a deep dive into watching the full debates of Dr. William Lane Craig, and follow his propositional logic very carefully. After a while, you will begin to take note that one side of the debates are forced to rely on snarky sarcasm, equivocation, logical fallacies, obfuscation, empty rhetoric, and outright lies (very similar to watching Karin Jean Pierre answer questions). This is a hallmark of someone who cannot use truth to prove their point. Devious debate tactics are all they have, because they are wrong. If they were right, they would have endless facts to back up their assertions.

@@hxhdfjifzirstc894 beautiful! I believe I already think in the manner you’ve described but I could hardly articulate such as eloquently as you have here! I’ll certainly explore Craig’s debates. Thank you for the suggestion! And thank you for taking the time to further expound on the crystalline concept! This stuff makes my brain happy. 😃

@@hxhdfjifzirstc894 but by your definition, things don't add up, things simply can't be refuted. and this is why conspiracy theories live in the darkness. they're attractive to people who don't know a lot because they don't have the information available to contradict those things. a person walks into a room with a smile on their face. two minutes later they walk out upset followed by another person. a conspiracy theorist would believe they have some knowledge about what occurred in that room. there's no data to contradict whatever story they tell. what tends to happen is once they've decided they know, then when new information is made available they discard the information that refutes their belief and adhere to anything that supports it. eventually you end up with "the entire gov't is corrupt" and "all doctors are liars" and whatever else needs to be true in order to keep their theory alive in the blizzard of contradictory information.

i think he was having a hard time keeping it together when she was talking about penguins.

sorry, did i miss the part where she was asking actual questions?

What does Dr. Fauci have on these two researchers? It's called grant approval authority.

@@miles6910 lol That's what I thought

Covering their tracks, getting their stories to corroborate.

​@@mackiemesser3692federal grants are not free money. Progress reports are required as are annual accountability reports. Apparently there was mishandling of this in addition to the GAO.

Yes. Russia immediately captured these labs during early phases of the war.

It's not only possible but very probable!

Of course it was true! In the early phases of the war the ucranians rushed to burn as much documents as they could

Bingo - it was one of Putins reasons for war. First strike principle was the other. Too bad that will never be investigated

13, there were 13 in Ukraine and as far as I know most of them were destroyed. Thankyou Putin.

Im still waiting to hear "I know you are but what am i?" and "Im rubber youre glue...." and the like.

Visit your local Church and there you will find the helping hand you seek. Praise God.

Our prayers will be with you and your family.

Hail satan!

@@willli8163 poor child

Bless You