Astonishing Corruption at The Supreme Court?

Подписаться 3,2 млн

Просмотров 1,8 млн

50% 1

Ethics? Never heard of it 👨‍💻 Remove personal information off the web with Incogni with code LEGALEAGLE legaleagle.link/incogni ⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? Get the EagleTeam! legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

Опубликовано:

5 май 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 8 тыс.

@LegalEagle Год назад

⚖ What's the solution here? 👨‍💻 Remove personal data online with Incogni! legaleagle.link/incogni

@Tegridynews Год назад

Can I share this on my channel?

@NarrowMullen Год назад

Democrats need to take the GOP threat to democracy seriously and act accordingly, otherwise America is doomed to fall to authoritarianism and theocratic fascism.

@TheWebstaff Год назад

Justice Thomas enters the chat.. Does this work retrospectively? e.g. can I remove some information I'd like not to be public knowledge..

@ellwoodwolf Год назад

Since a Supreme Court appointment is for life, if you are found guilty of a felony, the punishment should be EXECUTION.

@levin645 Год назад

MERIKA

@melodymcdaniel9268 Год назад

Man, I work for a local government agency and we aren't even allowed to give our supervisors birthday gifts. The fact that the highest court in the entire country has less ethical integrity than us is a huge joke.

@Dataisthetruth Год назад

Rules for thee but not for me

@JB-ef7ks Год назад

Is it really surprising though?? Everyone knows, atleast most street smart ones, that the legal system is only used against poor people!!

@4niasomnia573 Год назад

I work for a medical device company and, basically, we have to report if we bought some fries for a surgeon to prevent the appearance of undo influence. It’s astounding that the highest court in the land doesn’t have to do the same.

@shawnwales696 Год назад

Retired federal employee here, we had really high standards, not sure how Thomas thinks that doesn't apply to him.

@dracoargentum9783 Год назад

What I don't understand is WHY at the top is less stringent guidelines in play, why are not the top judges held to the same guide as lower judges?

@joermnyc Год назад

All 9 of them saying, “don’t worry, we can self-police ourselves” is all the more reason to impose a code of ethics on them!

@hewdelfewijfe Год назад

If I was in charge, (and if I could also ensure that their replacements would be better), I would impeach every single motherfucker on the court for signing that letter. All 9 of them. That's objective proof that they're all unforgivably corrupt.

@Plant_Parenthood Год назад

@@atheos19 Also term limits!

@yishnir Год назад

A Puerto [blank] case should be brought against most of them, and their benefactors.

@neilkurzman4907 Год назад

They’re being asked to impose a code of conduct on themselves. And they won’t even do that.

@shevek2954 Год назад

It leads me to believe they're all as corrupt as Thomas.

@Gnight787 Год назад

I work for a company, I am not a Supreme Court justice, but if someone gives me anything worth more than 25$ and I don't disclose it, I lose my job. Full stop. This is insane.

@cameron398 11 месяцев назад

Really interesting. By chance what type of company do you work for that would require you to report 25 dollars in gifts from a 40 year friend?

@astronaut2317 10 месяцев назад

@@cameron398all of them, actually. If that 40 year friend’s behavior conflicts with the interest of said company. :)

@default9314 10 месяцев назад

@@astronaut2317So, any triple A game I presume? This is a real question btw

@gumtoonistbeats7842 10 месяцев назад

with all due respect, that in of itself is crazy. if a friend gives me a 60$ game, i shouldnt have to disclose that to anyone.

@hanspecans 10 месяцев назад

@@cameron398do you lick boots for a living?

@JBass33 Год назад

I was an administrative law judge during my legal career. Not only was I bound by the strict ethics rules of the State Bar of California, I was also bound by the even stricter ethic rules applied to judicial officers. I had to fill out detailed reports every year listing every source of any kind of income from stocks, bonds, speaking fees, gifts, etc.) and I was required to avoid even the “appearance of impropriety.” Regardless of whether he was technically required to report his free trips, etc, the actions of Justice Thomas certainly gives the appearance of impropriety. But no, the Supreme Court considers itself above such rules. Time for a change.

@jonathanbethards3689 Год назад

the fact that these people are unelected and serve LIFETIME appointments is staggeringly insane, to me

@mareezy 9 месяцев назад

Yes, time for a change. Since you are in that field, is there something you could do to help that?

@johnl6176 8 месяцев назад

But 28 U.S. Code § 455 applies to Supreme Court justices just as it applies to all other judges and magistrates. The difference is that there is no-one to force these justices to comply, they can only be impeached. That'll never happen.

@robertt9342 Год назад

It’s crazy that regular civil servants have more restrictions, oversight and punishments then those at the highest levels.

@Robbedem Год назад

except for police ofcourse. ;)

@mrevilducky Год назад

As it is in every field

@percheroneclipse238 Год назад

I had to return pens. Nobody can give gifts over $3.00

@StopItGarrison Год назад

@@Robbedem by design

@caocaoholdingaplushie6022 Год назад

As they say, a knife is sharp downwards but dull upwards

@daniele4568 Год назад

I'm so sick of the two tiered legal system. I was a prison guard, and every year we were lectured on the crime of accepting "gifts". How we would get fired and even prosecuted. If only I had been "friends" with a billionaire...

@TheBLGL Год назад

You were part of the two-tiered justice system. 😂 You think any of those people you kept incarcerated were rich?

@loganphillips5935 Год назад

Shit, I was told I couldn’t take tips or gifts at Best Buy

@poindextertunes Год назад

@@TheBLGL weird comment. Why would he think any of those ppl were rich? where did he say that?

@SaraphDarklaw Год назад

@@poindextertunes The 2 tiered justice system is separated by wealth. Being a prison guard, he was enforcing that same justice system.

@TsunamiWombat Год назад

@@poindextertunes He's mad at him for being a Corrections Officer and thus being part of the criminal justice system, which they feel is unjust, and so are taking a swipe

@ra2186 Год назад

All I learned from this is that nobody will be held accountable.

@Ryan-wx1bi Год назад

Unless they use him for a scapegoat. Usually makes the herd feel safer that they "got one"

@JazerMedia Год назад

I don't know what's worse, that a judge in the highest-ranking judicial body in the United States of America didn't know well enough that what he was doing was unlawful, that he knowingly did it without fear of recourse, or that he was so out of touch that he didn't find what he was doing problematic at all.

@aquietwhyme Год назад

That's a trifecta of suck right there.

@jonathanbethards3689 Год назад

getting to be about time for the pitchforks and torches

@anevilscientist Год назад

The funniest of all this is that Thomas's defense is basically "I didn't know the law." Since he's supposed to be one of the top legal professionals of the country.

@pixel_glitched Год назад

“You had _ONE_ job.”

@coryzilligen790 Год назад

@@pixel_glitched If only it was "had," and not "have."

@NicoleDaKiwi Год назад

Have you heard his legal opinions? He is an ideological hack.

@shevek2954 Год назад

"I didn't know the law." I thought his rulings already made that abundantly clear.

@anevilscientist Год назад

@@shevek2954 🤣true

@marz9487 Год назад

“I was unaware the law required me to report that.” - Supreme Court Justice

@davidgalvez5341 Год назад

I always heard ignorance of the law wasn't a valid excuse.

@scifino1 Год назад

@@davidgalvez5341 Actually, in a lot of criminal offences, it is, if they require intent.

@XXMatt0040XX Год назад

@@davidgalvez5341 It isn't. Unless you're a cop.

@alaind276 Год назад

@@scifino1 intent doesn't mean intent to break the law, it is intent to commit the unlawful action. So no, not knowing the law is not a defense. At least not one that will keep you out of jail in the USA.

@SomeRandomJackAss Год назад

"I didn't know I couldn't do that?"

@sookendestroy1 Год назад

My favorite part is a supreme court justice arguing "I didnt know this was illegal therefore It shouldnt be an issue" which is like the 5th graders understanding of the law, that if you didn't know it was illegal it doesnt apply to you

@KafshakTashtak Год назад

Shouldn't that disqualify him for the role? He lied in his resume, to court.

@NicholasWiewiora Год назад

@@KafshakTashtak One would think.

@jonathanbethards3689 Год назад

How many times have we seen in real court cases: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse."

@baltakatei 11 месяцев назад

Don't give Supreme Court justices the benefit of the doubt.

@candice_ecidnac Год назад

ANY politician (Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Unaffiliated, whatever) who breaks the law needs to be prosecuted. Judges (liberal or conservative) who take bribes need to be removed from the bench. Elected and appointed officials are PUBLIC SERVANTS whose job it is to do what their constituents want, and judges are meant to be impartial, period. If you are not doing your job you deserve to lose your job!

@drizzmatec Год назад

Any found guilty should receive a life sentence irregardless of the normal punishment.

@jliller Год назад

The greater the authority, the greater the responsibility, the greater the punishment for abusing that authority or neglecting that responsibility.

@pixelman1234 8 месяцев назад

Evidence?

@haxie4516 8 месяцев назад

@@pixelman1234 Sorry, are you asking for evidence for someone saying that people who break the law should be prosecuted? Are you dense?

@avpguy11 Год назад

“We’ve investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing”-SCOTUS

@osmosisjones4912 Год назад

Are you talking about the 2020 election

@Awprtunist Год назад

@@osmosisjones4912they said SCOTUS

@Republicanismisadisease Год назад

@@osmosisjones4912🍼😭

@joachimschoder Год назад

@@osmosisjones4912 The Republican party and Republican controlled state governments founded quite a few investigations themselves and they came to the same result.

@ScantSphinx9 Год назад

@@osmosisjones4912no, they’re talking about SCOTUS

@DontFeedTheTrolls Год назад

When I worked as a county employee, I couldn't even accept a cup of coffee for free. This is an OUTRAGE!!

@AlmostEthical Год назад

Exactly. At work, we had to declare everything, no matter how trivial. When corruption in high places is so blatant and unaccountable, democracy breaks down.

@octothorpian_nightmare Год назад

cops don't have to report all the freebies they get, either. Weird how people with actual powers don't really have accountability.

@sharonolson5782 Год назад

I’m a doctor and I cannot even get a pen for free!

@fort809 Год назад

@@octothorpian_nightmare of course they aren’t accountable, they create the laws

@Secret_Moon Год назад

@@octothorpian_nightmare well, because they're with actual powers.

@TMFX619 Год назад

I recall in my US politics and history classes/courses that the reason the Supreme Court Justices are lifetime appointments was to AVOID corruption. Seems like it’s giving a lifetime of corruption instead.

@carlastarkey4775 Год назад

The supreme court lost me at " corporations are people and money is speech".

@ralphlivingston894 Год назад

That’s a great comment! Unfortunately, it’s an even bigger issue… And no one is talking about it. “ Citizens united“ is making everything more corrupt.

@switchsinc Год назад

TERM LIMITS FOR ALL! NO EXCEPTIONS.

@jonathanbethards3689 Год назад

Mitt Romney: "Corporations are people, my friend.."

@gemanscombe4985 Год назад

@@jonathanbethards3689 Corporations, as legal/business entities, are surrogate bodies ("corpus", Latin for "body") that shield actual people from liability. Mitt and SCOTUS meant that people are involved in corporations as officers, employees and stockholders, but they already have free speech. The ruling was just a way to stack the deck even more in favor of the wealthy.

@Nixeu42 9 месяцев назад

To be fair, corporate personhood as a legal concept is extremely fundamental to business law. It's why they can enter into contracts, own property, and both sue people and be sued themselves. But they're not supposed to have *all* the rights of an actual human person.

@superdimensionfoto Год назад

While attending college I worked as a bank teller, I had to refuse all gifts over $10 in value and report everything under for approval including Christmas cookies. Even though I had zero power to approve loans or remove late charges. It all got reported. He gets millions of dollar worth of gifts from influential friends, and he's got the power to make decisions that will influence millions of our lives. Where's justice in that?

@ScottBaker_ Год назад

I can't even accept a cheap branded ball point pen without declaring it and turning it in.

@IMBlakeley Год назад

@@ScottBaker_ When I worked for a large multi-national the max was €25 which still had to be declared each time, 99% of the time this would be just to cover meals which the customer might have sprung for.

@magnusbjarni Год назад

@@ScottBaker_so if someone dislikes you, they can give you multiple cheap gifts that you then have to declare?

@smokedbeefandcheese4144 Год назад

It’s supreme justice

@cadenvanvalkenburg6718 Год назад

@@magnusbjarni yes

@jbmp1390 Год назад

If regular citizens can be held to the standard that ignorance of the law is not an excuse for breaking it, then a judge for the highest court in the land should definitely be held to that same standard, preferably one that's even harsher. How the hell does a supreme court justice claim to not know the law on something so obvious?!

@thomasderosso5625 Год назад

_"How the hell does a supreme court justice claim to not know the law on something so obvious?!"_ Because he knows he won't be punished for it, so it doesn't matter.

@matheusjahnke8643 Год назад

Because he interprets the law... Yes, I, after careful reflection, decided that the law says I don't need to do that. >Sue me... I'm the judge above all judges anyway.

@huntercoleherr Год назад

@@thomasderosso5625 I mean, why even lie, then?

@michaelj.beglinjr.2804 Год назад

@@huntercoleherr ---Because he knows he's wrong and what he did was highly illegal. He needs impeached and disbarred ASAP.

@greenredblue Год назад

It's not just that he's a Supreme Court Justice, because that body actually was envisioned as a way to include laypeople with diverse life experience in the direction of the law. No, the extra kick in the pants is that _he has a law degree._ He's claiming ignorance and inability in his _specific field of expertise._

@MelodicQuest Год назад

It absolutely baffling that the system of checks and balances rarely ever applies to those at the highest positions

@New2DM2 Год назад

The ENTIRE accounting and audit profession has to be independent in practice AND IN APPEARANCE, so the validity of the information we prepare and review can be held to scrutiny. We mostly handle only money. I've never understood why SCOTUS, who sets legal precedent for the entire country, gets a lower standard.

@FiresCollide Год назад

My favorite thing is the way this is all being defended like "You can't possibly expect me, a Supreme Court Justice whose job and duty it is to interpret and understand complicated law, to correctly interpret and understand complicated law."

@cl8804 Год назад

the latter is not complicated, though

@agoo7581 Год назад

"I thought being a supreme court justice just meant getting to eliminate the rights of women and disenfranchise trans people!"

@silverXnoise Год назад

@@agoo7581Yeah, I’ve just started referring to them as “clerics”, Supreme Ayatollah Brent “Biffed It” Kavanaugh.

@cl8804 Год назад

@@agoo7581 i mean, thomas isn't wrong about that bit Dxracer

@nathanielknight1838 Год назад

law does not equal law. The judges there probably don't know most real estate laws. They're supposed to be experts on the constitution.

@troubadour723 Год назад

“Unchecked power over the entire American legal system” - that’s actually a nice concise way of describing everything that is wrong with said “legal” system.

@tubebrocoli Год назад

pretty sure there's a lot more wrong than that

@sexmansex4776 Год назад

that's the most miniscule thing from all the things wrong with the legal system

@Piketom1 Год назад

As with any system, the buck has to stop somewhere. The problem is that it is stopping at a transparently partisan and corrupt court.

@reformedconvict Год назад

Do you remember the seperation of power and state it would apply in this very thing so they cant be affected tha anymore trying leaving politics out so good luck

@TheSuzberry Год назад

Let’s be accurate: ours is a legal system not a justice system.

@jukahri Год назад

I remember the point being made that this job is for life precisely so that justices be not tempted to curry favor with private interests to secure their position after their term is over.

@lancedooley9304 Год назад

Actually with the phrase or IRS qualified dependent, the nephew could be a qualifying relative of Thomas, meaning he was Thomas’s dependent and would be required to disclose the gifts. This is based on the fact that he was the legal guardian, housed him, and raised him like a son.

@ShankarSivarajan Год назад

Did the statute say "and" or "or"?

@lancedooley9304 Год назад

@@ShankarSivarajan or is what he said. I have pulled the statue itself though.

@ShankarSivarajan Год назад

@@lancedooley9304 What? At 20:07 he clearly says "… _and_ who is a dependent defined by the IRS."

@lancedooley9304 Год назад

@@ShankarSivarajan then my mistake. But he would still meet all the requirements for the payment to be disclosed depending on how the law is written.

@laurencebrown3822 Год назад

It just reinforces the fact that we have TWO justice systems -- One for the rich, and one for the rest.

@IwasFRAMEDiTELLyou Год назад

One's a justice system, the other is just a method of retaining power over and draining resources from the other.

@kingforaday8725 Год назад

Hahahaha and you aint gonna do nutin about it hahaha

@morphor Год назад

@@kingforaday8725 you laugh at others suffering? Seriously? This isnt even a person falls down stairs but is otherwise ok scenario

@IwasFRAMEDiTELLyou Год назад

@@morphor Some people can only be happy if someone else is miserable. It's honestly kinda sad

@JamesDavy2009 Год назад

@@IwasFRAMEDiTELLyou That's sadism for you.

@kinjiru731 Год назад

The Court has lost all credibility. When there is no appetite to deal with possible corruption and insufficient mechanisms of accountability, corruption will only become worse. The fact that the Court seems unconcerned with the appearance of corruption tells the tale.

@JasonBoyce Год назад

this is the roberts court. he was placed on the court to do two things: dismantle the voting rights act, and allow unlimited dark money into political campaigns he's done both of those things. he doesn't care about anything else

@rachelk4805 Год назад

Apparently, that's all they have going for them. Guess we don't have to listen to them any more.

@warlordofbritannia Год назад

The delegitimization of the highest Court in the land tells a worrisome story. Never a healthy sign for a democracy.

@bobbymoss6160 Год назад

That's because they all do it. Creating ethics and moral regulations would be like shooting themselves in the foot.

@blankityblankblank2321 Год назад

I disagree to a degree. I find it still very professional and focused on staying in their lane. It is still much more credible and less corrupt than Congress. But yes... there needs to more accountability.

@angela_eric Год назад

In a lower court the judge would be stripped of their seat and possibly disbarred if they were a lawyer before becoming a judge if something like this was found out. However, because he's a supreme court justice the only way to remove him would be an impeachment hearing in the senate, and the house separately. I find that extremely wrong. Also your editors are getting really good.

@switchsinc Год назад

THIS! This is why we need term limits for all positions in the government. No exceptions.

@allseeinghamster6001 Год назад

Yes, but good luck getting polticians to give themselves term limits.

@Fantastic_Mr_Fox 10 месяцев назад

@@allseeinghamster6001All politicians have term limits. Justices are not politicians (supposedly)

@pokehybridtrainer 10 месяцев назад

They don't wanna give up that job security most of us scrape along.

@Fantastic_Mr_Fox 10 месяцев назад

@@pokehybridtrainer Do you even have any idea why there are no term limits for justices? Why do you speak on something you clearly know nothing about

@Fade2GrayOG Год назад

As a government employee, if I accepted any of these gifts I'd be out on my ass. I'm barely even allowed to accept a lanyard at a conference. The mere *appearance* of corruption is enough to warrant punishment.

@ntrong32 Год назад

That's your fault for having a boss. Why didn't you decide to be the top unassailable court in the land? Jk

@kingforaday8725 Год назад

Guess you just aint smart enough to get away with it!!! Thomas is hahahaha

@kenos911 Год назад

If every part of the gov could do this, corruption would be through the roof

@zacheryeckard3051 Год назад

@@kingforaday8725 Are you seriously taking the pro-corruption stance? That's not owning the libs, fam.

@havcola6983 Год назад

@@kenos911 Arguably, in the house and senate they just legalized it and called it lobbying

@MrGoesBoom Год назад

The higher you are in any government position the more accountable and subject to scrutiny you should be, not less. Damned infuriating that the highest levels of our government seem to be able to get away with damn near anything they want and are protected while doing so.

@Aury Год назад

If a court is supposed to be nonpartisan...they really gotta have things in place to make sure it stays that way...particularly by keeping the judges out of wealthy pockets.

@albertwong5793 Год назад

"No one would vacation at New Haven, CT." Ouch, I felt that one.

@MaturedSinner Год назад

It's insane that we hold college basketball players to a higher standard for receiving gifts than we do for the literal nine people that decide our human rights.

@taesonslane2513 Год назад

Clearly it's all intentional. Why do you think billionaire families all go to Harvard law school? They don't need to work. They learn how to use law for the sole purpose of using it to oppress us and maintain their power.

@akinokusami3623 Год назад

Mad!

@ThePrufessa Год назад

Never even thought of that aspect. Also, just think if this judge was a Democrat. The right wing would be trying to have him killed over this.

@morphor Год назад

@@akinokusami3623 dude this applies to all of the federal government not just the supreme court the whole system is broken/corrupt/working as intended for the rich oligarchs who all financial and political leaders should be in prison

@k-aw-teksleepysageuni8181 Год назад

@@morphor THIS. WAKE UP PEOPLE.Elephant in the room, or giant ass, either way your supporting two sides of the same coin. CORRUPT career politicians with nothing but corporate billionaire D sucking skills.

@Ericc804 Год назад

It’s legal when a Supreme Court justice do it, but if it’s a mail room clerk, please expect him/her to go to jail. This is the insane world that we live in.

@kethmarhkfy7luf.263 Год назад

At the very least he committed tax fraud. They should go after him like they did with Al Capone.

@RegalPixelKing Год назад

Rules for thee but not for me.

@lostboy8084 Год назад

And yet when government officials namely the presidential press secretary spoke about encouraging people to go these very judges house's to harassing them unless they commit to vote for keeping roe VS. Wade. Which is actually illegal but nobody spoke up. Hunter Biden clearly using his father's position to get a job and kickbacks with what has some emails and other records that seem to link Joe Biden as recipients of some money from individuals who have connections to forgien countries. The classified documents that just lying around everywhere. All these things and yet no outrage but a story about a conservative judge well how dare they. I mean why are you surprised the whole government is corrupt the whole idea was elected officials would give service back to the country, but now it really is making sure how much benefits you can get. When politicians lose the election they become lobbyists who then use their knowledge and connections to earn millions to lobby things. I mean if you are going to call out things on government officials and politicians then make sure you call out not just one side but all of them. The news media once was supposed to be the watch dog, but now they become a tool for the politicians to use against normal citizens

@jaybk718 Год назад

It's more insane how we just stand by and let it happen.

@kingforaday8725 Год назад

He aint gonna be charged or impeached!!!! And he will do it again and yall cant do nutin about it!!! hahahahahahaha!!!!

@corshani Год назад

either he committed these crimes knowingly, or he's ignorant of the laws he is expected to live by and enforce, either way he is unqualified to remain a judge, let alone a supreme court justice.

@joshuapettus6973 Год назад

Wow, that was one subtle dig at New Haven, CT. @2:20 Beautiful!

@JR-pr8jb Год назад

The Court's corruption is one thing, but what gets me is their arrogant refusal even to acknowledge possible wrongdoing.

@whannabi Год назад

It's also the case with other politicians in general

@jons787 Год назад

First rule of crime is to not admit to the crime.

@Kannot2023 Год назад

They don't want to indict themselves.

@pantheis Год назад

@@jons787 Unless your Trump. In which case, admit loudly and claim it wasn't a crime. And if it was a crime he didn't do it. And if he did do it he was allowed to do it. And if he wasn't allowed to do it it's all liberals fault.

@edwinamendelssohn5129 Год назад

Dems have tried to take him out for years. A black republican refugee their stupid racist rhetoric

@7bootzy Год назад

It pisses me off so much that - as a state employee of a relatively small agency - I would have been terminated, lost my license to practice, and most likely been criminally charged for 1/100th of the things Thomas has had come to light recently.

@Jay_Frank Год назад

False equivalency, you aren't given unchecked power for life.

@Khronogi Год назад

@@Jay_Frank That makes it even worse.

@MitChHic Год назад

@@Jay_Frank that makes it 100x worse.

@rayRay-pw6gz Год назад

We and all our elected officials knew that this setup was there. The Supreme Court governs itself , that is why BOTH PARTIES want THEIR judges on the court . Why are we shocked NOW ? 🇺🇸🙈🇺🇸🙈🇺🇸🙈 This may be the highest court in the land but , that does not mean it is ethical and moral !

@blasttyrant3228 Год назад

@@MitChHic that makes it 1000x worse.

@zgjfinance2796 Год назад

Definitely illegal not to disclose real estate sales over a certain amount

@michaelallen185 Год назад

2:20 lol the random dig at New Haven hahahaha

@mattmower6370 Год назад

Can we all just pause for a moment and ponder that a supreme court justice is claiming ignorance of the law as an excuse?

@shevek2954 Год назад

For Thomas this is a plausible defense.

@maeschder Год назад

Americans love that defence, cops use it all the time

@quorryraphael9980 Год назад

iirc he was never a judge so Why the heck is he a justice

@coryandrum Год назад

You think politicians read the bills and laws they put in place?

@mickkelly6389 Год назад

Ignorance of the law is no defence!

@hayzed9491 Год назад

The fact that the supreme court are not held to the same level of ethics and conflicts scrutiny as that of lower courts is an outright disgrace and something that needs remedying.

@NotYourBusiness-bp2qn Год назад

What you people don't understand is that scrutiny is enforced top down. No hierarchy can go up forever at some point there has to be someone or a group of people that have no boss. And if you have no boss there is no scrutiny.

@Takentot4458 Год назад

@@NotYourBusiness-bp2qn so true. Such a dilemma.

@notaninquisitor7274 Год назад

@@NotYourBusiness-bp2qn that shows how hierarchies are built to fail for structures of governance. if all power comes from the top then all the structural weight rests on that pillar. A rotten pillar will collapse.

@ChumblesMumbles Год назад

Not true. The president is subject to ethics laws. There’s nobody higher in the executive branch. Robert’s is deluding himself that Congress can’t pass and enforce ethics regulations on the SC - it absolutely can if it can ever function again.

@michaelj.beglinjr.2804 Год назад

@@NotYourBusiness-bp2qn ---Their boss is supposed to be the laws they swore to uphold, which obviously meant nothing to Thomas. Political appointments for life is a very stupid idea for obvious reasons.

@Benanov Год назад

I caught that New Haven, CT joke - well played!

@nigeldepledge3790 10 месяцев назад

If Thomas didn't understand the rules, or made a number of little "mistakes" in his reporting of gifts, shouldn't that automatically disqualify him from sitting as any kind of justice / judge anywhere? Above all else, SCOTUS is supposed to be about understanding the law, and ruling on interpretations thereof. Also, any good lawyer needs to pay attention to the details of whatever they're working on. I'd have thought this was fundamental.

@respawnpoint7677 Год назад

Calling him "Justice" Thomas has a lot of bitter irony. I'm an elected official - no power, no budget, I maintain monuments in a small town as a volunteer. I am in charge of nothing, nobody, and no money. And yet, when I got the job, I had to go through "conflict of interest" training, that could be summed up as "do not EVER accept ANY gift or service that has a value of greater than $50 as part of your job." So, could I instead become a judge and cast aside all pretense of following the law?

@Greentrees60 Год назад

Thank you for your work!

@idontwantahandlethough Год назад

thanks for being cool :)

@dickball2638 Год назад

Not just a judge... most judges can be removed... but not a "Supreme Court Justice"🤐

@MorlockTrxsh Год назад

Yes you are an idiot. Being honorable is idiotic in this society.

@mikes2381 Год назад

@@dickball2638 SCJs can also be removed the same as the President. But that is a similar impeachment and removal procedure. And well, you saw how the last few have gone. So Thomas is okay unless he himself takes up arms against the government.

@jamesdangelo2539 Год назад

I've been watching your videos for about a year...love them!

@stevenshea990 Год назад

2:20 Massive shade towards New Haven🤣

@itzyforever17 Год назад

“i prefer walmart parking lots to beaches” over compensation at its finest.

@thecloneguyz Год назад

Funny he doesn't have any pictures of Walmart parking lots only really expensive vacation pictures on all his social media

@GroovyFeminist Год назад

If you're going to lie at least make the lie believeble.

@alyssaheller7860 Год назад

Lmao WHO perfers trailer parks and Walmart parking lots to beaches or ANYTHING? And even worse, WHO thinks that is a convincing lie? All that fancy education doesn't amount to much if you think/believe that does it? Or think/expect people to believe that.

@MalevolentSpirit234 Год назад

Honestly once I heard that line I understood everything I needed to know about this case lol

@Veltrosstho Год назад

Yeah, Walmart parking lots are great for when I was homeless and sleeping out of my car. This dude needs to an hero.

@perciusmandate Год назад

It remains astounding to me that nine unelected, lifetime appointee overlords control the entirety of US legal canon with zero oversight or even the hint of a code of ethics. What checks and balances?

@crumblingronald3012 Год назад

Nah but it's a democracy tho that mean tHe PoEpLe arE in ChaRgE

@secondarydevice1767 Год назад

We're like 60 Senate votes shy of "checks and balances" working like it's supposed to. Hey, guess who else gets a shitpot of money from the same donors.

@hgservices5572 Год назад

Yeah but joe Biden launders more money than you can count through ukrain and we’re ok with it 🤷‍♂️ we don’t have any clue where it’s ended up but I bet you can guess

@TurinTurambar200 Год назад

In theory, they are appointed by the executive branch, approved by the legislative branch, and lack enforcement powers.

@militaryartandscience Год назад

They don't control "the entirety of us legal canon". There is a mechanism for the other two branches to undo every and any decision made by the Supreme Court. All the court can do is interpret current law. Congress has the power to initiate a change to the law and undo any interpretation they don't like. Problem is, Congress prefers to avoid many of the larger issues.

@syewilliams2372 Год назад

I asked advice from my corrupt colleagues and they said I was a judge so I can do what I want- what makes you think that loads of money will effect my decisions - it’s just crazy

@robertgillis2697 4 месяца назад

I was hoping I had heard “Quid Pro Crow” at roughly 8:56. I urge you to use it in the future!

@ARTSONICFAN990 Год назад

Another prime example of why no one has full trust on the justice system.

@CD-vb9fi Год назад

You can never "trust" anything in government. You must always distrust and demand they "prove/justify" everything they do. No exception. What is sad is that the muppets from the D's or R's give "their side" a pass on things like this.

@Piketom1 Год назад

Which is why the appearance of corruption is just as bad as actual corruption.

@fritzman6483 Год назад

You mean castle rock wasn’t enough?

@Shwert890 Год назад

I don’t even refer to it as the justice system it’s the legal system and we all know money is the best way to beat the system

@marcuscenturian2152 Год назад

It reminds me of that line from Animal Farm- Everyone is created equal, just some are more equal than others.

@Zeyev Год назад

I worked for over 45 years for the Federal Government, serving as a contracting officer's technical representative for part of that time. I once had to return a piece of paper with art that was sent to me as a sample. I was not even allowed the throw it out. Why? Because my ethics officer said the "de minimus" value of a gift was zero. We could not sit at the same table if the contractor and the Government employees went to lunch at the same restaurant. Appearance as well as details was paramount in our minds. Having arbiters of the law openly flout these standards is, as our mothers would have said, "disappointing."

@leiajiang7877 Год назад

Damn. I guess only the highest court gets to be corrupt

@sallyatticum Год назад

As attorneys for state board of accountancy, we were not allowed to accept anything from the accountants we regulated, including things like venison, which one board member attempted to gift us for Christmas. lol. We were told we could not accept any gifts above a certain dollar amount I can no longer recall. But it was very small.

@wvu05 Год назад

As a state Caseworker, I have to disclose every gift I get over $50 from someone who is not an immediate relative. I also have to report being a treasurer for a group at my church that pays for scholarships for students in Africa and school supplies for children in America, even though I don't get paid and we meet maybe once a year.

@RicochetForce Год назад

This type of corruption being at the top is almost more likely than not found further down as well. For example, the police in almost every state having such an incestuous relationship with local DAs and judges has never led anywhere good.

@sjsupa Год назад

A group of us once went to NASA to install computers as contractors. The work went long into the evening so we order pizza. The NASA workers who were accompanying us insisted to pay their portions. They said they did not want to be fired over some free pizza.

@Articulate99 Год назад

Always interesting, thank you.

@EpicallyAverageDude Год назад

I'm (almost) not sure which is worse, a supreme court justice who's on the take, or one who's too stupid to know what a bribe is.

@Lahk1 Год назад

*trying to convince you he's too stupid, citing the landmark 1991 case Urkel v Winslow and the famous "Did I do that?" defense.

@shevek2954 Год назад

Citizens United make it clear the SC's understanding of corruption goes against common sense.

@ralphlivingston894 Год назад

Great comment… I wish I would’ve posted it!

@CreaturesOfTheMarsh Год назад

Are you referring to Sotomayor taking $3 million from a company and not recusing herself from their case?

@antondevonlh Год назад

@@CreaturesOfTheMarshIt's not the burn you think it is. Unlike Republicans, I want all of them thrown out for this. They proved with their little "we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong" statement that, with the possible exception of KBJ because she's new enough to the highest court to not know how corrupt it is in person, the whole building is rancid to the core. Eject the full set, right now. You won't call for that, of course, because it's not really about standards, it's empty "whataboutisms" to protect the corruption when it benefits your team.

@ellicel Год назад

The only way I can interpret the Court’s reluctance to define and adhere to higher ethical standards is to infer all of them engage in similar, if not worse, behavior that simply hasn’t come to light. I don’t know why I had been so naive as to imagine the Supreme Court was any less corrupt than Congress, but I was. This is deeply depressing. We’re completely on our own and left to exist in whatever space the rich deign to reluctantly provide. Meanwhile, corporate media ensures we train our justifiable anger against each other instead of the ruling class.

@pablodonner5213 Год назад

Is always good to remember that it was the Citizens united court ruling that determined that money for campaigns was free speech, that tells you all you need to know about the supreme court

@CHAAAAAOTIC Год назад

You’ve got the right idea but the wrong attitude. What we need to do is organize, whether that be through unionization or political movement, and once we have enough power, force them to comply with the will of the people. It’s not exactly a revolution but it’d be a hell of a lot better than what we’ve got.

@kajaxochi8562 Год назад

You can go read the writings of anarchists from a hundred years ago where they point out that these hierarchical structures do nothing but breed corruption and oppression and they are still right today. Things have not changed as much as we hope.

@rosiemurphy7793 Год назад

worse this whole thing and their public refusal makes It seem like they're waving a sign right now that they are buyable

@laurabowles Год назад

Completely agree with you. I want a full audit of every single one of these justices and accountability for whatever they're hiding.

@TheAdrift Год назад

8:37 “Highlighter” lol editor, I see u 👀

@weidnerd Год назад

Love the stock image for New Haven. Hahaha.

@winter_s_44 Год назад

Just heard an interview on MSNBC where Harlan Crow was asked point blank if he would be friends with Clarence Thomas if he was not a SC Justice and his response was essentially: "I don't know how to answer that." I think this tells us all we need to know.

@yoursodumn Год назад

Yeah, that he probably wouldn't have been put in position to meet him, moron?

@mr.fluffypantz4150 Год назад

It’s so easy to just say yes for the PR. Sheesh imagine the ego

@Wolfstanus Год назад

Well for one He would be an entirely different person. If you didn't have the life experiences as you do now? would your friends still be friends with you? If they say yes then they would either be lying or ignorant as you wouldn't be who you are. It a simple question that can't have a simple answer.

@BigSmiley0TV Год назад

@@Wolfstanusf course different life experience makes for a different life and person, but unless you met a friend through work it seems to kind of be easy to answer, at least for me and my friends. They do not really care what job I hold nor I of them. I have had friends that have had job changes and have been friends when they were jobless as they have been with me through job changes and times of no work. My main focus of life is making art and I have friends that knew me before I got good enough for them to care about that any more than they cared about my comic book collection and I have friends that don't even much like most of my art, but none of them are friends with me for what I do with my days and nights except the times we share of life laughter advice and shoulders to bear life's burdens. Every single friend might say they might not know who I might be if I weren't an artist but none would hesitate to say they would be my friend if I never painted again or never had painted or whatever work I did or didn't do as long as I'm not asking them for money they don't care about my job at all

@winter_s_44 Год назад

@@Wolfstanus I have a best friend. If someone asked if I would still be friends with her if she were not a Physical Therapist, my answer would obviously be “yes” because her career does not define our friendship. Now, if you choose to be obtuse and pretend as though you don’t know what this question was asking, that’s on you. This is not the same as asking “if she never attended the same school as you and majored in Physical Therapy, do you think you would have met and become friends?” The original question obviously means that ALL OTHER THINGS REMAINING EQUAL, would you be friends with that person if they did not hold the status/title they hold? Any adult gets this. It is also exacerbated by his follow-up where he says all relationships are transactional. Which means he views his relationship as transactional and that if he was not getting something from him, they may not be friends. To give this answer in response to someone asking specifically about someone’s TITLE kind of shows that it is his TITLE that he is using. In my example, if I followed the PT question with: “I can’t answer that because all relationships are transactional,” wouldn’t that imply to you that something about my friend’s PT title is what keeps me engaged in our relationship and that if I wasn’t able to capitalize on it in a transactional way, I am not sure the friendship would exist? C’mon. Use your brain just a bit.

@Thepopcornator Год назад

Wow. What a great friend Harlan Crowe is. Just giving millions of dollars worth of trips, items, and favours without expecting a single thing in return. What a guy.

@razvanzamfir1545 Год назад

didn't you know? Billionaires love throwing away their money on others!

@jcarry5214 Год назад

In a sense it could be sincere since Thomas is an insecure, one-operation automaton whose sole occupation is to smash YES on the most conservative option no matter what. So, my thought is that a conservative donor trying to influence him might be the stupidest person alive performing the most redundant bribery in history. I wonder if he also bribes surgeons to was their hands and drive Porsches. But yeah mega corrupt regardless.

@lyndsaybrown8471 Год назад

I mean, even assuming that Harlan Crowe never asked for anything, you couldn't say that this wouldn't influence Thomas. All those gifts and you wouldn't want to do something for your friend that only you could do?

@goatmeal5241 Год назад

There's no quid pro Crowe here, definitely not.

@suezbell1 Год назад

"owner"

@joshbbglover Год назад

2:20 prime New Haven joke 😂😂

@ericsnell3040 Год назад

The New Haven dig was hilarious.

@grantzolldan Год назад

I can't imagine a more blatant and obvious reason for him to be kicked out. Even claiming ignorance, as the highest ruler of law in the country, being ignorant of the law should be reason enough to have him removed.

@FancyKerbloops Год назад

This.

@stevenf7683 Год назад

I posted about this earlier but I will state it again - the Martin tuition issue COULD be okay. The Crows have given extensively to RMA over the years. In fact, they paid for a new academic building to be built at RMA in 1988. They also have funded numerous scholarships at RMA over the years. How do I know this? I graduated from RMA in 1990 and benefited from the Crow's kindness. The question now becomes did Martin get his tuition paid for directly by Crow or did he get assigned a scholarship funded by the Crows from the Financial Aid Office at RMA. RMA has so many scholarships that the Crows fund that if the Financial Aid Office assigned him, things COULD be okay. If the tuition was paid DIRECTLY by the Crows, it is quite troublesome. We need more information in regards to this specific instance before we reach judgement in regards to this issue. No matter what, the visualizations of this are quite troubling.

@MikeCrain Год назад

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" and he's someone who makes it. So he's either really stupid and incompetent or incredibly corrupt. I hope for his sake it's the former because that's actually the better thing to be in this, by far.

@CreatingAlong Год назад

As the cops always say to the civilians "ignorance of the law is not an excuse to not follow it"

@joemorris2886 Год назад

Sotomyor recd 3.5ml. F u all

@SophiaAphrodite Год назад

IF none of this was technically illegal. Why were there so many efforts to hide all of it. Also I feel like the conversation with his colleague was more like this. " So I have a billionaire friend who gives me things and does me financial favors. Should I report that stuff? " " Oh shit, no you better not. "

@josephang9927 Год назад

Same reason why Bernie hides he is a millionare now. Optics.

@Yusuf-ke5iu Год назад

if it wasn legal, they would hide it to avoid suspiscion and to not draw attention to just how corrupt they are. of course, no cover can last forever, but at least you get away with it for some time.

@92HazelMocha Год назад

"It's all a smear campaign by the Democrats" But if you're actually an impartial judge, why would they even want to smear you?

@matheusjahnke8643 Год назад

Did they try to actively hide it? Or just didn't report? The former is an action, the latter is an omission. One is actively trying to save your hide. The other might be just laziness. Also, just a nitpick because I don't think it applies here: privacy is the kind of thing which isn't supposed to be illegal, but you still don't want people knowing. So please ponder "If you don't have nothing illegal show us everything", again I don't think you are making _that_ straw-man argument, but keep that in mind... especially since privacy is quite the topic nowadays.

@fastertrackcreative Год назад

I kept hearing "the delicate light reflecting off of Thomas Crow's cat"

@swampharos 10 месяцев назад

"No one would ever vacation in New Haven, Connecticut." 😂😂😂 I CANNOT.

@edawgrules Год назад

My favorite response to this issue is from Jordan Klepper on the Daily Show: “In Clarence Thomas's defense, the law is complicated. And he's only a Supreme Court Justice.”

@joachimschoder Год назад

The US supreme court doesn't have to follow US law. They are writing it.

@jawstrock2215 Год назад

@@joachimschoder They are not, Congress is.. they just interpret it. and it's fun seeing them using the most twisted or idiotic way to interpret sometimes to get the results they want. "Let's go 200 years in the past, using law made before the country was even founded to justify this..."

@nancycronin551 Год назад

@@joachimschoder Ah, so, for you to feel good about yourself, you need to admire people who were placed into positions of power via monetary means rather than people who do great good via great sacrifice. Got it. Noted.

@NavaSDMB Год назад

The writers in that show definitely do not get paid enough.

@kindlin Год назад

@@nancycronin551 What?

@gabiausten8774 Год назад

Here in Europe u have justices being forced to step down because they accepted spaghetti, a pen, a hat, a tie… just as a small reality check.

@nmappraiser9926 Год назад

Judges and other public officials in the U.S. as well. It's only the Supreme Court that is above the law. That's what the Constitution says, I'm pretty sure. I've never read it, but that's because I'm a Supreme Court justice.

@huitzil2389 Год назад

The difference isn't between American and European judges. The difference is between Big Important Judges and little-guy functionaries nobody cares about. Europe's politics and judiciary are just as corrupt -- Jesus, I mean, look at FIFA.

@ethanor Год назад

Americans: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

@icin4d Год назад

"Justice for money, how much can you pay? We all know it's the American way." -Styx

@june9914 Год назад

I really wanna know what they were doing with those 4 things

@vivalapita8484 Год назад

2:20 throwing some shade are we lol

@charleyandsarah Год назад

He’s pretty well known. And RV people are pretty friendly. Has anyone ever reported to seeing him in Walmart or RV parks?

@cathsaigh2197 Год назад

He could have gone with "I prefer the local lake beach" or "I prefer a nature park" or "I prefer a remote coast to a tourist white sand beach". But no, he just had to go all in with a walmart parking lot.

@jbern2185 Год назад

Haha. Yeah, "I prefer the rural parts of America. RV parks and Wal-Mart parking lots.". So funny! He could have gone further to saying he prefers eating Waffle House with his wife instead of fine dining.

@Salieri47 Год назад

Yeah, that struck me as over-the-top BSing.

@Kite403 Год назад

Bro, people who camp in RV campgrounds would much rather island hop than camp in an RV campground. Those places are redneck hell!

@EmbraceTerror Год назад

I've seen hundreds of parking lots. Still trying to figure out what is more special or implied more humble about one parking lot over another. Word salad maybe? Ahahaha.

@fitzy7079 Год назад

@@jbern2185 At the time it was weird, now it's like; who paid for the RV?

@FTZPLTC Год назад

Jesus, someone said they prefer to holiday in Walmart parking lots and it's taken this long for them to be investigated?

@tealablu3759 Год назад

🤣🤣🤣🤣 I mean, you’re not wrong. Seems sussy

@IdentifiantE.S Год назад

😶

@teresas8173 Год назад

Such blatant bs. He’s always been a liar. He cannot be trusted whatsoever yet we have to put up with him making laws that impact all Americans. It’s nauseating.

@thecloneguyz Год назад

Especially since he has hundreds of pictures on their social media pages from around the world but not one picture from a Walmart parking lot

@notenough1484 Год назад

1:17 Is that the true definition of Friends with benefits No strings attached 🤐

@deliriumsd142 Год назад

When you're a supreme court justice they let you do it.

@RedPandaStan Год назад

It's almost like a group of people with nearly unfettered power have no reason to follow the law, who would've thought?

@AurizenDarkstar Год назад

It's telling that to the conservative justices (including the Chief Justice), the law doesn't bind them, but it does bind their fellow liberal justices (since you can bet they would demand recusal or removal of them should any of them have committed the same actions as Thomas).

@helloiamenergyman Год назад

Aaaaand that's why judicial impeachment should happen and why I think congress are a bunch of pussies for not doing anything about it

@therealtimc08 Год назад

@@AurizenDarkstar That isn't true at all. In reality, all the SC justices respect each other and are mostly friends. Ginsberg and Scalia had polar opposite opinions but were basically best friends. Roberts has been writing since his confirmation about his concern for the public perception of the court and overpoliticization of judicial opinions, which is a major reason he voted with the liberal wing on Obamacare and tried to find middle ground in Dobbs. He has great concern over the perception of the court. The vast majority of the Court's cases are not political and don't typically split the way the politics makes it seem.

@archie8767 Год назад

@@AurizenDarkstar Random House and Sotomayor? Demand her recusal.

@shevek2954 Год назад

This is why it's unwise to give so much power to a small group of unelected officials.

@tcs007 Год назад

I have a very difficult time believing that none of the other Justices knew this was going on. Which leads me to wonder how many of the other Justices have enjoyed these same kinds of "perks" and from whom?

@ToxicSpider0711 Год назад

Exactly I don’t know why it’s gotten so partisan if there is corruption from either democrat or republican Supreme Court justices there should be consequences

@Jay_Frank Год назад

@@ToxicSpider0711 there*

@ToxicSpider0711 Год назад

@@Jay_Frank damn man hurting an English majors ego

@poindextertunes Год назад

@@Jay_Frank literally no one cares.

@raoghh Год назад

Whole dem was getting free trips and shit from a rep. Can’t even imagine the reps benefits

@growsomeplace9987 Год назад

LOL, was that commercial for Clarence Thomas LOL, it really felt like it was :)

@Bethelaine1 10 месяцев назад

To say he had no idea these things might be a big no no is a little bit hard to believe, he is an attorney with a degree from an Ivy League university. He has pointed out that he received high marks. Did he skip ethics classes?

@Rine.4656 Год назад

I used to conduct financial disclosure investigations when I was in the Military and the things Justice Thomas has done is far worse than anything anyone disclosed on their OGE Form 450s. I remember seeing Admirals return command ball caps because they didn't want the perception of favoritism; all federal employees should be held to the same standard and if any Justice doesn't like it, there's the door. You would think the Supreme Court would take actions to remove any doubt regarding the perception of potential corruption, but I guess this is to be expected when you leave anyone to police themselves with no oversight.

@terrancex339 Год назад

Even if it's legal, it's still downright unethical because you have personal stake in this in a form of financial gain (a massive one at that) to the one directly overseeing the judiciary system. The reason why in any legal system today, we don't allow both the judge and jury with personal connection with either the prosecution or defendant to preside over a court case because people are all too well aware that for the longest time it obviously creates an atmosphere of biasness.

@Rine.4656 Год назад

@@terrancex339 My main concern is how this will likely erode the legitimacy of the Supreme Court since there's apparently more than one now involved in questionable financial entanglements. What kind of example does that set for the rest of the judicial system when the highest court can't keep it's nose clean and set an example for all other lower courts?

@wildfire9280 Год назад

No oversight and no legal recourse beyond the political action of impeachment and removal from office, unlikely in such a climate.

@tangomango8474 Год назад

It's the system working as intended. The system exist for the rich to screw over the working class

@autohmae Год назад

their are no checks and balances on the supreme court, which is why those who want to abuse power use that route.

@skyler4517 Год назад

Frankly, the fact that all the people serving on the Supreme Court signed on to that letter does more to make me question the ethicality of their private dealings than it does to instill confidence in Thomas' behavior. The reason why we got dirt on Thomas instead of a different person is not something I wonder about.

@travis1240 Год назад

Exactly. It was a huge sign saying "don't investigate us", which is also a huge red flag saying that we should. I can't think of another reason the Democratic justices would stand up for a despicable person like Thomas.

@butterbean2257 Год назад

@@travis1240*and Republican justices. Come on now bud this is something we can all get behind. I understand your point but it’s pretty obvious this is systemic. Just don’t want us to get it twisted, everybody likely sucks here.

@andrewm8703 Год назад

So far reporting has mostly been on Thomas. But it has also been reported that Sotomayer did not disclose a $3m book deal. She weighed in on a case regarding that publisher as a justice. So not just Thomas, but it seems to be one of the more egregious cases due to the number, the length of time and the dollar figures. The entire system of how it functions smells of rot. I'm not American, but it is obvious something needs to change.

@Revan058 Год назад

@@andrewm8703 No, no, STOP. The book deal was 100% disclosed. What the Daily Wire is whining about is her not reclusing herself from a case that didn't even get cert.

@cindystewart5417 Год назад

@@andrewm8703 Sotomayer DID disclose the book deal -- the $3,000,000 was received as royalties over about 10 years, not all at once, and since it was disclosed the petitioners before the court had the option of asking her to recuse herself but did not. It was also technically legal as, as I said, the payments were royalties and she was not on the board of the organization. (Sort of like she doesn't have to recuse from a case involving Kroger because she shops there). We may want to tighten up the regulations, but as it stands now they were not technically illegal. Gorsuch also did not recuse himself from the same case for the same reason. Again, since these were disclosed transactions, the petitioners were at liberty to request their recusals but did not.

@julietdenniss1798 Год назад

Would you explain what the legal issues are going on about the GA electors’ attorneys? How would an attorney be barred from participating in a case?

@MsEverAfterings Год назад

I couldn’t even receive a bloody coaster from a supplier (touristy souvenir) without disclosing that to my company. A coaster that does not cost more than $10.

@GoodPotatoes Год назад

And people wonder why the younger generations have lost all faith in this country. Serious Change is needed and will not happen until something drastic is done.

@212caboose Год назад

Younger generations were TAUGHT to lose faith in this country.

@worldlinezero4783 Год назад

@@212caboose No, we were not. We saw with our own eyes what the government is doing, and we're tired of it. We were fed the same American Exceptionalist propaganda in elementary, we just saw the truth past it.

@maledwarfwarrior Год назад

@@212caboose By whom? The corrupt abusing their authority? The megacorps greedily trampling the country in their pursuit of profit? The teachers desperately attempting to cover the gaps in their budget with their own funds for the sake of the children?

@HJKampe Год назад

@212caboose Not taught. They learned. Now that people know the Supreme Court doesn't enforce ethic violations, people will lose more faith in the Justice system.

@Khronogi Год назад

@@212caboose When you teach the youth to think critically, they tend to critically think. And that tends to see through corruption pretty fast.

@squidgert566 Год назад

“I didn’t know the law” says a Supreme Court judge.

@VitalXtreme 11 месяцев назад

This happens with every politician in the form of lobbying and campaign contributions. Corporations often promise positions within their company with 3x the pay and benefits as their current employer to politicians. Politicians pass their policies then leave and join the company that sponsored them. Lobbying as a whole needs to be regulated more rigorously or banned outright otherwise Corporations will have more influence over policy implementation that the people.

@juanpabloperezgomez4349 Год назад

Any chance of expanding on the Supreme Court extra-curricular shenanigans, like how Chief Justice Roberts' wife is in cahoots with a number of big legal firms that regularly present cases to the supreme court, or how George Mason University's law school has become a darling and sweet deal provider for every conservative justice during the last few years?

@DrewWalton Год назад

I tried to give my probation officer a coffee mug and she had to refuse it. The idea that a Supreme Court justice would accept all of these lavish gifts is unconscionable.

@wmdkitty Год назад

That's when you find a way to just stealth-gift it, sneak it onto her desk when she's not there... _via legal means, of course!_

@rl318 Год назад

@@wmdkitty I don't think breaking into a probation officer's desk is worth it, especially to break another law 😁

@donaldwert7137 Год назад

Oh, he didn't know he was supposed to report these things. Interesting. I wonder how many times in his judicial career the phrase "ignorance of the law is no excuse" has come up.

@babybijou969 Год назад

The law is just too complicated when it comes to justices applying the rules to themselves

@thecloneguyz Год назад

Funny how ignorance of the law is no excuse unless you were a police officer or a judge We literally have thousands of RU-vid video showing police officers violating their constitutional oath on camera and literally nothing happens to them for it

@thecloneguyz Год назад

Literally every day we get like a dozen new RU-vid video showing police officers violating their constitutional oath and making up fake laws and literally they never ever ever get punished or disciplined for it which means the Constitutional oath is bullshitted means nothing to them

@naughtynat82 Год назад

Is there a law that he broke?

@donaldwert7137 Год назад

@@naughtynat82 Not that I'm aware of, but I'm not a lawyer. Codes of conduct and ethics are seldom codified as law, more's the pity, but I'm pretty sure there's a reason for it. I've only seen the "I didn't know" defense work once and that was in an instance where the investigators genuinely didn't think the person under investigation was smart enough to understand the complexity of what he had done and that it violated the law. Whatever else he may or may not be, Thomas isn't stupid.

@starlight4n710 Год назад

Suggestion. Video about old laws still technically on the books that are strange.

@sonjaquan5775 Год назад

"...Indonesia, upstate New York, and New Haven Connecticut" (shows picture of a landfill) Editor doing good work there.

@arcticbanana66 Год назад

I'm a Shift Supervisor at Walgreens. Every year all employees are required to take training in the Corporate Integrity Agreements, the Corporate Code of Ethics, Fraud/Waste/Abuse guidelines, and HIPAA (and several others I can't recall at the moment, but those are the big ones). Anyone who doesn't complete these courses by the deadline, no matter if you're a cashier or the Regional Manager, is placed on administrative leave until they do. If I were to help an elderly woman carry heavy bags to her car, and she offered me a couple dollars as a tip, simply _accepting_ it would get me fired, no matter if I reported it or not. Edit: I commented below but I'll add this here too since I know the majority of RU-vid users don't read comments before replying. The point is that the company wants to avoid there being even the _appeareance_ of any kind of unethical behavior, and that even a retail business has stricter ethical guidelines than the Supreme Court apparently does. Unfortunately most comments here have either missed the point or ignored it, and are more focused on "lol gReEdY cOmPaNy nO lEt eMpLoYeEs tAkE tIpS", which may be true but is irrelevant to the subject at hand.

@williampearson6299 Год назад

WHY is everyone only noticing this now? Anita Hill wasn't enough of a hint?

@KafshakTashtak Год назад

Why? It's a corporation, not a government entity.

@numb3r5ev3n Год назад

I'm in I.T. and we have to redo all of that training quarterly.

@jek4837 Год назад

They should definitely get the Walgreens to do some SCOTUS training. They should do the training for the handling of classified info and teach it to Joe, Donald, Hillary , and the DOJ as well.

@johanmetreus1268 Год назад

Sounds like a very good reason to have nothing to do with Walgreens.

@PsiNorm Год назад

It's amazing the friends you get when you become a supreme court justice.

@ZackdasBohne Год назад

For real. And most of them are also so generous. 😁

@AnonyMous-jf4lc Год назад

Start a successful business and see what happens in your personal life. You will stop associating yourself with people that constantly want something from you and begin forming friendships with peers. Even your previous best friends will be jealous of your success and want something.

@frozennorth3426 Год назад

@@AnonyMous-jf4lc only if your habit was always to flock together with fellow terrible people, such that you need to overhaul your ‘friend’ group every time you level-up financially

@hb1338 Год назад

.. and how, mysteriously, they are often people not remotely of your ilk.

@th5160 Год назад

Your childhood billionaire friend.

@Grandleon Год назад

I got so mad when Paoletta was going on about Thomas's "great financial sacrifice" in relation to his nephew. Excuse me? These people are multi-millionaires. They don't know anything about sacrifice.

@jbern2185 Год назад

Yeah, they get paid very, very well. Its almost sad the money that Clarence is willing to accept given how much he Makes. He's been an SC justice for over 30 years now too! He is free to retire anytime he wants with a great pension and can go work for the Heritage Foundation with his wife or this billionaire. But maybe it's more fun to get paid well on the taxpayer money then get paid better from his "friends" to influence laws that benefit his "friends".

@thingamabob3902 Год назад

"they"sacrifice peasants livelyhoods daily, so they know how it is done .... in theory ^^

@nef36 Год назад

"Oh no, my funny stock number went down when I did this specific thing. This is a massive tragedy that I definitely don't have to report under the law that was specifically written to say specifically that I have to report this specific exact thing".

@jbern2185 Год назад

@@thingamabob3902 Yes, but he's got make sure his billionaire friends keep making money. Apparently they aren't willing to sacrifice and Clarence will happily be their corrupt puppet to make sure they don't sacrifice.

@Zanzopan Год назад

@@jbern2185 He actually stated once that the money from being on SCOTUS is not worth being on SCOTUS. He is is there for the bribery and for pushing his Christofascist authoritarianism onto the country.

@juliancordova5851 Год назад

I had no idea you wanted to leverage the show into creating legal services. Wow, that's pretty brilliant. How does a law firm become one that you refer?

@iridescentsquids 9 месяцев назад

Would be curious to hear more about some of the fundamental arguments for why the Supreme Court isn’t subject to enforcement from other branches. I hear a lot arguments for potential corruption, but not so many for what kind of enforceable oversight would be a good idea, if any.

@lqr824 Год назад

PROTIP: anyone says something like "I prefer the Walmart parking lots to the beaches" you should investigate them IMMEDIATELY: THEY ARE CLEARLY HIDING SOMETHING!!!

@johndeaux8815 Год назад

He should get 20 years for that statement alone 😂

@nathangamble125 Год назад

That's probably where he meets his cocaine dealer.

@EebstertheGreat Год назад

@@nathangamble125 Does Thomas really look like he's on cocaine? Xanax, maybe...

@toddr2265 Год назад

😊Crow probably bought him a Walmart

@thecloneguyz Год назад

Especially when he has hundreds of pictures from around the world on his social media pages but not one picture from a Walmart parking lot

@JustSayPie Год назад

How long are we supposed to stomach this corruption when civil rights and basic safety are eroded every day?

@ItsTheLaw Год назад

Until we have a civil war.

@artistwithouttalent Год назад

Per RU-vid's terms, I cannot answer this question in the comments, or, probably, in a video. All I can say is that I hope Clarence "Uncle" Thomas and all his friends have a _nice time._

@andrewgreenwood9068 Год назад

Honestly it is probably time for the legislature and the executive to push the supreme court back into its box. Many of the courts recent decisions have effectively been legislative actions not legal ones

@jeremysmith4620 Год назад

@@andrewgreenwood9068 I must have had a dream that just a couple years ago this was possible somehow. I just can't stack all the answers together to figure out the expanded picture from that dream. If only I could rememb...oh wait, should have stacked the courts. But everyone said "how dare someone even suggest to alter this sacred system that could never be corrupt or controlled through politics and money," only to later discover that sacred system to be completely controlled by politics and money. Who would have guessed?

@yaosio Год назад

Forever. Republicans and Democrats don't want to do anything about it so there's nothing we can do.

@danaugust993 10 месяцев назад

Here in the Netherlands someone coined the term 'network corruption' to describe networks of influential people that exchange gifts, jobs and ideas without ever getting to close to a 'quid pro quo'. Seems like an apt description of what is described in the video.