Atheists Can't Explain DESIGN... BUT Science Is Discovering More Of It Everyday (Important!) 

“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” Werner Heisenberg

I love the fact that humanity is arrogant enough to believe that everything in this universe must be comprehensible to the human mind.

“It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”

I’ve always loved the example of flowers in a vase - no one would argue that the vase wasn’t designed and constructed intelligently, yet many would argue the flowers were, despite them being infinitely more complex.

The explanation as to how anyone so intelligent can reject what is quite evident is that “our struggle is not against flesh and blood but rather the powers and principalities of this dark world….”

I want to thank you for making this channel. It's helped me in the most profound ways. I've dealt with depression for as long as I can remember. At some point in my life, I conceded that it was just part of who I am, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel. I was lost and confused and couldn't tell you how many times I've hit what felt like rock bottom. One day, when it felt like my whole life was piling on top of me, I took a leap. I dropped to my knees and prayed to God. I sayed "God if you're real, please help me". At that moment, a voice in my mind said "I believe in you". I was overcome with emotion that I couldn't possibly explain in just a few words. Not only did I hear the words, I felt them so deeply. Since that moment, I've wanted nothing else but a closer relationship with God. Your channel has played the largest role in bringing me to Jesus Christ. From the bottom of my heart, Thank you.

I think Robinson deserves a lot of credit for being such a well versed interviewer who asks really thought provoking questions. It makes these interviews so interesting.

"Uncommon knowledge" is one of my favorites for in depth,informative and compelling talk on some of the most important topics concerning humanity and as an interviewer no one does it better than Peter Robinson

No amount of evidence will convince those who hate God.

The fact is many people have no problem acknowledging and accepting that mankind will one day create independent thinking AI but for some reason deny that we ourselves could possibly be the results of an even higher intellect.

“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” Werner Heisenberg Then again, Heisenberg could never be absolutely certain about anything.

I would love this kind of discussion being dubbed for people of other languages. God bless them.

I specialize in molecular biology. Try calculating the odds of assembling the sequence of the first functional protein of modest size (150AA) purely by chance alone, without the benefit of something like design. I’ll give you _all_ the particles in the known universe (10^80) working together in unison to make this one protein, reacting with each other at the fastest possible speed (Planck time of 10^-47 seconds), since the beginning of time (about 10^18 seconds), with an estimated sample space of functional proteins compared to nonfunctional proteins as 1 in 10^77. Don’t forget that forming a covalent bond between amino acids is a 1 in 2 chance, and that the L-form formation is also a 1 in 2 chance. Let’s assume there are 20 amino acids to choose from, so each amino acid should be considered as a 1 in 20 chance. These are extremely generous, and even absurd, conditions to give chance the best chance.

This channel is more helpful than you know. I have been on a binge through your videos and I feel my outlook on life drastically changing for the better. Thank you.

This is the most verbose “God of the gaps” argument I’ve ever heard. Some people are so hell-bent on their being an answer, while some are content to answer “I don’t know”.

Beautiful! Three of the best minds presenting the science of existence!

I recommend watching the entire hour 20 minute video, definitely worth it! Watched it like 6 months ago gives you goosebumps🤯

Thank you so much for sharing this video. What was mindlessly playing in the background as I ate breakfast this morning and played a video game on another device, captured my attention so strongly I had to grab a notebook and take notes. As a Christian with a passion for cosmology, I'm astounded by the learned scientists who have totally disregarded the creation story of Genesis as being myth. My research shows science strengthens the Genesis model. It is encouraging to find like-minded, scholarly people leading the charge for Divine Intelligence and Creation.

I really enjoy these videos! Even though I am a Christian and theologian, I also consider myself an academic and an educator in the Social Sciences, and the arguments on both ends of the spectrum really cause me to think deeply about existential questions. It has deepened my faith in an all-wise, all-knowing, all-loving Supreme Creator who "does nothing save it be for the benefit of the world." Thanks for creating this channel and continuing to challenge and expand people's thinking and understanding of the universe and, more importantly, of ourselves.

I just got finished with the book called “After”. It’s about near death experience (NDE) there’s a wonderful explanation in there that we are all in a warehouse, so huge so big that would never be able to see you at all. And all we have is a flashlight, so what we know it’s only what we can see from that little spotlight. But when we die, the warehouse lights come on and we see and understand everything. I wish scientist would understand, We’re only looking with the flashlight this huge warehouse of our understanding.

Thanks for sharing. I love Peter Robinson's interviews. He's a former Reagan speech writer who wrote those famous words, "Mr. Gorbachev....tear down this wall!"

I think this bible verse explains why we see such overwhelming resistance from the highest levels. Ephesians 6:12 “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

Mark Twain said "It is far easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled".

Your a good man! Thank you for giving us this chance to gleam from real teachers of wisdom. I subscribed!

I noticed you didn't "interrupt" the video as some pointed out perhaps rudely at times. Your humility is a great virtue because you didn't have to change your style and you did so kindly when some were not. Surely God noticed too. Peace to you.

World view holds much in the way one sees things. Design includes and suggests knowledge beyond what our senses can realize.

The "power dynamic" you reference is the visual front of the spiritual warfare, that has raged since Lucifer claimed "I will be like the most high God.".

Thanks so much for making such short and concise videos. This makes it so much easier to understand and learn how to argue and share my faith.

The singular issue is that if intelligent design exists, then we have a duty to our creator. It is the issue of sin.

I remember John Lennox. His mathematic approach regarding the existence of a higher being is something.

At the end: "I really appreciate you guys watching, if you still are." Just put it out there for whoever will watch. Only the people still watching will hear you say that. Sure be humble and appreciative, that's what the internet seems to demand (unless you're a comedian?), but what you offer is valuable to those who watch it, so go ahead and acknowledge its value. Don't deprecate yourself for offering it.

I saw this cideo several months ago when it was released from the Hoover Institute, which also has several excellent videos taped with Dr Thomas Sowell. I have several of Dr Sowell's books. RIP Dr Sowell

When I lost my brother through an illness and then made a pace with God to get a degree in biology and do research about that illness, I felt frustrated, I needed a philosophy and/or religion too. Thank you, well done.

I so enjoyed the nutshell description of the Behe quote. What more.... Subscribed Great guest!

*_THIS Video_* is one of my ALL-TIME Favorites. (And, yes, I'll go give the Hoover Institute more of this Love.) This tickles my mind quite deliciously. 😎♥✝🇺🇸💯

”And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.“ ‭‭John‬ ‭1‬:‭5‬ ‭

Left unsaid is the reason practitioners of modern "science" refuse to acknowledge the existence of the Creator -- because, if they acknowledged His existence, they would have to change the way they live in order to avoid his judgment and condemnation.

Science comes to a stopping point for everyone because even the greatest minds cannot comprehend it to continue, but that doesn’t mean it does not continue after we have reached the limit of our knowledge. Im currently on a journey in my Christianity, and your videos have been extremely helpful for me! Thanks for sharing and for helping me to remember what faith truly is!

Great video! Thanks! And thanks for bringing this discussion to light. I had not seen it before.

If we are the result of design we have a good idea of the recipe followed. First, create a universe of a septillion stars, planets and moons. Then wait 10 billion years. Then pick a planet swarming with complex organic molecules and tweak one to start replicating. Bacterial life begins. Then wait a further 3 billion years. Then, over the next half-billion years, guide that life through the stages of invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and birds. And how did the "designer" guide our evolution? By way of deadly cosmic and solar radiation; the O2 catastrophe; continental drift; mega-droughts; worldwide ice ages; mass starvations; supervolcano eruptions; predation; parasitic infestation; pathogenic infection and 5 mass extinctions. Talk about a rube-goldbergy way to produce humanity! 😄 The last mass extinction occurred when a giant meteorite struck near Yucatan, causing a worldwide cataclysm of suffering and death that led to the extinction of 2/3 to 3/4 of all species. But with the Dinos gone, the little mammals could emerge from their burrows and evolve into the many forms we see today like bats, whales, elephants and humans. Without that impact we wouldn't be here. Did the "designer" see that asteroid coming and let it pass? Intentionally hurl it at Earth? Or did it take the "designer" by surprise?

The fact science keeps changing the story is not a shortcoming, it is an advantage. Unlike your precious book, science corrects itself when errors are discovered. Religion is carved in stone, literally in some cases. Second, just like the ancients ascribed lightening, disease, the tides, etc, etc, etc, anything they didn’t yet understand to their imaginary friends, things we cannot yet explain will be understood in the future as due to natural causes, not your invisible pals.

Thank you, Daily Dose, for an insightful video from some wise scientific believers.

Thank you all for articulating well what most reasonable people like myself feel on this subject!

So many people have blinders on. Because we are in the great falling away. 1 Timothy 4 says, during that time, there will be those that forbid to marry, and that force to not eat meat. If you look at that critically, thats catholics, muslim, and hindu faiths. And those are the 3 biggest religions in the world. Keep praying, and keep spreading the gospel. The time is indeed short.

I think many in the scientific community will not allow for the possibility of a Creator for the same reason that materialists do, which is, to admit that there is a God who made everything that exists, would demand that they be morally accountable to Him. If He made the universe then He made man, and if He made man, then man is of necessity under Him and subject to Him, as are the laws of science and the natural world. Claiming unbelief in God does not make Him go away, nor does it let anyone off the hook for breaking His laws. His law is always love based. Explain love, scientists. It's all fig leaves to cover themselves.

I love these men and their minds, amazing. Meyer has the meta level of analysis for looking at the sciences. If I would have known his type of degre was available as an option during college I would have considered following that path.

The best part of this video is the declaration that rationality is not coterminous with science. The discussion then appeared to move towards broadening the definition of science, but stopped with "historical science". The speakers need to be clear about whose definition of science they are using. Today, science tends to be governed by Francis Bacon's definition, which is bounded by experimentation and observation. In this case, science is not coterminous with rationality and the idea of "historical science" is an oxymoron, since history is not subject to direct, repeated observation or experimentation. Aristotle defined science as any field of rigorous study. This includes history, but also all other fields of rigorous study including theology (queen of the sciences), philosophy, and mathematics (mathematics is deductive, Baconian science is inductive). Is this case, science and rationality are much more closely related. It is not clear whose definition they are using and why they used the term historical science. If we are to clearly argue, we must either keep to the Baconian definition of science, eliminating history as a science, or make it clear we are using the Aristotelian definition and explain what that means and why it is useful.

We all were made in the image of God.

Reason and faith are opposites, two mutually exclusive terms: there is no reconciliation or common ground. Faith is belief without, or in spite of, reason. As such, for the atheist, to embrace faith is to abandon reason.

I really enjoyed the last point you made and will absolutely use it in my discussions with those who blindly “follow the science…” excellent!🏆👍

Keep posting, you strenghten my faith everyday 🔥

I used to believe in sky daddy. Then I grew up

Always so that provoking! Thank you 🙏🏾❤

Absolutely 💯 true. These guys need to apply their science to looking at those place we call earth and how we have been lied to about its shape and its place in the heavens.

The real problem is a loss of humility on all fronts. The majority have been so coddled, so protected in the shell of "their truth" that anything that turns their perspective upside down is seen as a threat and not a chance to learn something new or something that is true.

I was making these arguments 40 years ago. How is it that this is cutting edge dialog? To science has always been an obligation to discern both what we know & more importantly be able to precisely distinguish it from what we don't know. I've never thought that science was incapable of pursuing with reason, logic, & a plethora of tools such as statistics, pure math, applied math, pursue things that seem to extend beyond those tools. We are therefore obligated to recognize when things extend beyond the material. Like emotions, atmospheres, & stimulation that cannot be sufficiently constrained by any tools of material measurement that we currently possess. There remains extensions into realms of perception that defy the material realm that we are duty bound to find a means of discussing, hypothesizing, theorizing methods of understanding that are sufficiently unconstrained by previous determinations so as to allow thought that is currently forbidden by having accepted into our minds & consciousness the idea that materialist ideology is loaded with false constraints every time you attempt to think beyond the veil of materialism. Constraints that insist on validating the illusion that non-material experiences are incomprehensible, undefinable, & therefore invalid. The also do this without having ever conducted experiments that prove the hypothesis - yet they're treating it, not as mere theory, but as undeniable fact. What could be more hypocritical than that? What arrogance says that, "despite my inability to answer certain questions I still maintain that I'm right in holding the position that they are unanswerable". Where's the basis for that determination? How did physical material prove that it's the only possible thing to ever exist? You have to define material as all powerful self sustaining thing - which means that the state of decay we see in the universe where inertia breaks down, where things are not sustainable in the material realm yet the hypothesis they bring is that the closest thing we have is a deteriorating universe that's so unstable that we're probably all doomed. Yet we see a universe of unimaginable movement & incomprehensible power holding planets in orbits & manages billions of stars, millions of galaxies, & they find no evidence of eternity while implying that eternity itself is real - but without the ability to even make that statement due to the contradictory ideology that observes two disparate phenomena & decides that they are one thing & the other an illusion. Their feeble minds have zero interest (or perhaps great fear) toward resolving that paradox. Instead they deny it's relevance & often it's very existence - like the elephant in the room. Yet we possess the capability of grasping the concept of eternity. Why would we have that capability? What is the point of being able to comprehend an idea or concept but have nothing in the universe that produced it to apply it to? If that's the case then we have quite a few faculties that are capable of both imagining how to use them but being able to conceptualize & describe our hypothesis - unless there are things that can be discovered in that zone of understanding? These people are the doctors that ripped out my appendix when I was 13 because they thought it was a useless organ. No it's an important secreter of colon disinfectant to keep the immune system strong. I want it back now that I know what it's for. They were too stupid to believe that, despite all the trouble someone went to to design an appendix, it's useless. The arrogance of scientists who think it's their job to constrain what is possible simply to protect their own pitifully weak ego's. They're so afraid of being perceived as not having all the answers - they prefer to hide that & force others to join them - than explore for answers that are uncomfortable to pursue. What hypocrisy, while living in a universe where materialists deny eternity by insisting that the material world is either eternal or nothing is eternal. They don't actually say that but that's the conclusion they are pointing to without having the balls to speak it out loud for fear of the utter futility of the idea being exposed. They can see that the physical universe is always in a state of decline - moving from order to disorder - & not the other way. We don't know if that's an illusion or whether it's actually happening. But will scientists admit their ignorance - NO. Not the materialists - which is why they get so blistering angry is that you're exposing what they are in denial of & that's what they hate - hate - hate - is being perceived as not knowing it all - which is the thing they are attempting to project as a collective group - the falsehood that the religion of science they have created is nothing more than an idol & they are mere idol worshipers - which is always accompanied by anger because idols are spirits that rule with anger, threats, & intimidation. God delivers with love, mercy, compassion, & peace.

When I was very young I went to a private school of God called sacred heart in West Palm Beach FL. I just now remember having a small meeting with my church late at night when we got listen to and talk to a man that looks like the oldest who went to Oxford. I remember the man being known for being a very smart person who tried very hard to disprove the existence of God but ultimately turned and found Jesus. It was a captivating story which I still hold greatly. There are many stories like this of great smart men who seek to destroy the name of God but ultimately confess to turning to following him instead.

Thank you Brandon. There is a place for literal thinking, and also a place for lateral thinking.

Just great! Thank you for sharing 😊

Great conclusion at the end. Says it all.

I have such A HIGH Regard for this content! Thank you ❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉

Hey Brandon, I started watching your channel these past weeks or so, and I really enjoy your curation. It's probably because we have the same fascinations. I also watched your doc (Mining for God) recently with my family, and we really enjoyed it. Watching this video, I wanted to offer you one suggestion to possibly provide more value to your viewers. I think you probably could have paused the conversation more and offered a distilled personal take on these points, especially in more down to earth terms that would help the philosophically uninitiated to grab on and be challenged to go deeper. I suspect if this theory was true, you would see a certain degree of viewer drop-offs during some of the more heady discourse. And if you start tossing out life lines around those kinds of points, you would see greater retention. So, if you've already tried that and found this level of interjection to work best, feel free to disregard. Otherwise, worth a shot? Grace and peace!

Wonderful! Thank you for sharing this. I will be sharing this with my kids and happy to think of our discussions. Ty again

Years ago I saw these things explained by Beaty and Myers and others . It's logical, scientifically sound , and fascinating and very good

Wow, Wonderful. Read, think, and then go deeper! God is Real...

„ if they would say: we do not know! that would be ok with me! but they pretend they do! that is a problem for me!“ exactly!

To anyone unaware, this is from uncommon knowledge at the hoover Institute (a libertarian-conservitive leaning thinktank in California.) The interviews in recent years are conducted by Peter Robinson; to my money he is the best interviewer in the english speaking world. The interviews on this program are amazing, I've seen dozens of hours of these videos.

There are some aspects of reality that can be understood by material causes, and some that cannot. Most importantly however for many aspects of reality it is not yet known, or perhaps even will never be known, whether they are explainable in terms of material causes. Incorrectly affirming that a phenomenon is NOT explainable by material causes discourages inquiry into material causes. I think this is why so many Scientists resent religion. Science and Religion, are AND SHOULD BE fierce but friendly adversaries!

Three great minds with a love for God!! Love them!!

Like a small orphaned child , humanity is constantly looking for approval/validation from a absent parent instead of making its own way in the world and continually improving its own condition for the benefit of all its siblings . The absent parent is always present in the very nature of the child and it’s environment and the positive results of the aforementioned mentioned individual shall be the true reward and enables the return to the garden of its ultimate repose .

When I was a lad, Evolution was the dogma in Zoology class, and ir all those examples from palaeontology... We also did rock climbing at HARRISONS ROCKS in Kent.Years later they found flint arrowheads at a geological level of 2.5million years. According to the school curriculum that's 2.3 million years that isnt even close to being explained, by evolutionary theory. Also no mention was made at school of Alfred Wallace...

We have absolutely no idea about gravity, electricity, and magnetism...period! We know how to utilize those forces very well, but have no idea how they become a force...

To put Franklin M.Harold 's quote in perspective, here's another quote of him "A pattern of global evolution that features deep time dominated by microbes, saltatory events such as lateral gene transfer, symbiosis, periodic catastrophes and bursts of innovation is not exactly what Darwin had in mind ….. But even cell evolution is animated by the universal principles of heredity, variation and natural selection. Cell evolution is not the world Darwin knew, but it’s Darwin’s world all the same." (In Search of Cell History: The Evolution of Life’s Building Blocks”, 2014)

Thank you for posting your videos. However, I would like to request that you do not interrupt the video with your request to subscribe when one of the speakers is in mid-sentence, because it’s highly distracting and these speakers usually speak using complex sentence structures and requires that a person pays attention if they want to get their point. Thank you, and please keep sharing your content!

Every Christian here should know this: Michael Behe he is not a Young Earth creationist. He understands evolution is a real thing. The following is the interview were asking the question and Michael responding: ” Are you saying that Darwin’s theory is completely wrong?" BEHE - Not at all. It is an excellent explanation for some features of life, but it has sharp limits. Darwin’s theory is an amalgam of several concepts: 1) random mutation, 2) natural selection, and 3) common descent. Common descent and natural selection are very well-supported.

Wonderful to hear noted scientists beginning to acknowledge the possibility of Intelligent Design. God is good.

Just at the first point regarding newton only describing gravity not explaining it - that is correct, however Einstein 200 years later did explain it to a very deep level in his theory of general relativity.

I did my BA in Logic and went from a science fan to a science critic when I realized how much of science calls on fallacies. Appeal to authority is the most common.

Having the right knowledge and understanding is not a matter of science and intellect, but a matter of the state of consciousness. That's why we need to know that consciousness is not in our mind but in us, the spiritual Being, the Soul. Hence, consciousness is a spiritual and not an intellectual/mental category. All this says that true knowledge should be sought in internal and not in external realities. Even the knowledge that we already have in the external world was brought from internal or higher realities. If you study the methods and techniques used by many, the highest scientists, you will discover how they transmitted or brought knowledge from higher realities. Today, there have been books about this for a long time, but most people are not ready to turn to them and study them thoroughly. A huge number of people already know that we are immortal beings, but few of them want to go beyond that. There is absolutely no secret, however, everyone must step into higher states of consciousness to wish or have the need to step out of their own framework and step into true knowledge and understanding.

Love your cap lol I have one just like it. Excellent video

Just throwing my uneducated input. Today is a day to celebrate Spring, the Birds and the Bees the Flowers and the Trees the Moon up above it’s a thing called ❤️ Love! To Be or not to Be:) I love our Curiosity that we look for answers in all our questions. My momma always told me why make something so hard when it just might be so simple:)) we all need to evolve out of the need for greed that produces hate and be real stewards of our collective Home:)❤️

"As above, so below, as within, so without, as the universe, so the soul." Time is such a sublime realm, in which what you call past, present, and future exists inter-relationally. That is, they are not opposites, but rather parts of the same whole; progressions of the same idea; cycles of the same energy; aspects of the same immutable Truth. If you conclude from this that past, present, and future exist at one and the same "time," you are right. (Yet now is not the moment to discuss that. We can get into this in much greater detail when we explore the whole concept of time - which we will do late.) The world is the way it is because it could not be any other way and still exist in the gross realm of physicality. Earthquakes and hurricanes, floods and tornadoes, and events that you call natural disasters are but movements of the elements from one polarity to the other. The whole birth-death cycle is part of this movement. These are the rhythms of life, and everything in gross reality is subject to them, because life itself is a rhythm. It is a wave, a vibration, a pulsation at the very heart of the All That Is. Imagination - Process of Pure Creation The process of creation starts with thought - an idea, conception, visualization. Everything you see was once someone's idea. Nothing exists in your world that did not first exist as pure thought. This is true of the universe as well. Thought is the first level of creation. Next comes the word. Everything you say is a thought expressed. It is creative and sends forth creative energy into the universe. Words are more dynamic (thus, some might say more creative) than thought, because words are a different level of vibration from thought. They disrupt (change, alter, affect) the universe with greater impact. Words are the second level of creation. Next comes action. Actions are words moving. Words are thoughts expressed. Thoughts are ideas formed. Ideas are energies come together. Energies are forces released. Forces are elements existent. Elements are particles of God, portions of ALL, the stuff of everything. The beginning is God. The end is action. Action is God creating - or God experienced. Conversation With God - The Holy Trinity You are a tree-fold being. You consist of body, mind, and spirit. You could also call these the physical, the non-physical, and the meta-physical. This is the Holy Trinity, and it has been called by many names. That which you are, I am. I am manifested as Three-In-One. Some of your theologians have called this Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Your psychiatrists have recognized the triumvirate and called it conscious, subconscious, and super-conscious. Your philosophers have called it the id, the ego, and the super ego. Science calls this energy, matter, and antimatter. Poets speak of mind, heart, and soul. New Age thinkers refer to body, mind, and spirit. Your time is divided into past, present, and future. Could this not be the same as subconscious, conscious, and superconscious? Space is likewise divided into three: here, there, and the space between. It is defining and describing this "space between" that becomes difficult, elusive. The moment you begin defining or describing, the space you describe becomes "here" or "there." Yet we know this "space between" exists. It is what holds "here" and "there" in place - just as the eternal now holds "before" and "after" in place. These three aspects of you are actually three energies. You might call them Thought, Word, and Action. All three put together produce a result - which in your language and understanding is called a feeling, or experience. Your soul (subconscious, id, spirit, past, etc.) is the sum total of every feeling you've ever had (created). Your awareness of some of these is called your memory. When you have a memory, you are said to re-member. That is, to put back together. To reassemble the parts. When you reassemble all the parts of you, you will have re-membered Who You Really Are. GOD THE FATHER is knowing - the parent of all understanding, the begetter of all experience, for you cannot experience that which you do not know. GOD THE SON is experiencing - the embodiment, the acting out, of all that the Father knows of Itself, for you cannot be that which you have not experienced. GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT is being - the disembodiment of all that the Son has experienced of Itself; the simple, exquisite is-ness possible only through the memory of knowing and experiencing. This simple being is bliss. It is God-state, after knowing and experiencing Itself. It is that for which God yearned in the beginning. Of course, you are well past the point where you must have it explained to you that the father-son descriptions of God have nothing to do with gender. I use here the picturesque speech of your most recent scriptures. Much earlier holy writings placed this metaphor in a mother-daughter context. Neither is correct. Your mind can best hold the relationship as: parent-offspring. Or: that-which-gives-rise-to, and that-which-is-risen. Adding the third part of the Trinity produces this relationship: That which gives rise to / That which is risen / That which is. This Triune Reality is God's signature. It is the divine pattern. The three-in-one is everywhere found in the realms of the sublime. You cannot escape it in matters dealing with time and space, God and consciousness, or any of the subtle relationships. On the other hand, you will not find the Triune Truth in any of life's gross relationships. The Triune Truth is recognized in life's subtle relationships by everyone dealing with such relationships. Some of your religions have described the Triune Truth as Father, Son. and Holy Ghost. Some of your psychiatrists use the term super-conscious, conscious, and subconscious. Some of your spiritualists say mind, body, and spirit. Some of your philosophers say a thing is not true for you until it is true in thought, word, and deed. When discussing time, you speak of three times only: past, present, future. Similarly, there are three moments in your perception - before, now, and after. In terms of spatial relationships, whether considering the points in the universe, or various points in your own room, you recognize here, there, and the space in between. In matters of gross relationships, you recognize no "in-between." That is because gross relationships are always dyads, whereas relationships of the higher realm are invariably triads. Hence, there is left-right, up-down, big-small, fast-slow, hot-cold, and the greatest dyad ever created: Male-Female. There are no in-between in these dyads. A thing is either one thing or the other, or some greater or lesser version in relationship to one of these polarities. Within the realm of gross relationships, nothing conceptualized can exist without a conceptualization of its opposite. Most of your day-to-day experience is foundationed in this reality. Within the realm of sublime relationships nothing which exists has an opposite. All is One, and everything progresses from one to the other in a never-ending circle.

About 50 years ago when I was 13 or 14 years old I came to the conclusion that what science can't answer religion can and what religion can't answer science can so they should be working together for deeper understanding.

"The Lmits of a Limitless Science." by Dr Stanley Jaki is a good read. Physicists turned Catholic priest.

People need to recognize that “science” is simply a disciplined process of asking questions primarily for the purpose of discovering a hint towards what could be the most appropriate follow up questions.

Just because something is beautiful doesn't mean there must be an entity of creation responsible for its design in divinity. Nature is simplistic and so is its manifestation or expression. Nature is divine.

“In his haughtiness, the wicked man makes no investigation; All his thoughts are: “There is no God.”(Psalm 10:4) “The foolish one says in his heart: “There is no Jehovah.” Their actions are corrupt, and their dealings are detestable; No one is doing good.”(Psalm 14:1)

*CONSISTENT and REPEATABLE EXPERIENCE is the BASIS for ALL SCIENTIFIC REASONING.* *Creation of new information is habitually associated with conscious activity. Our uniform and repeated experience affirms there is only one type of cause that produces information and that is always an intelligent mind. If there is a code (DNA), there is always a coder. (Information Theory: Sender and Receiver)* *A skeptic is not simply a contrarian, but a true skeptic challenges things which even they themselves think they know, while simultaneously being willing to accept to change their mind when fair evidence is presented. "Intellectual Honesty": Objective truth is true regardless what we believe.*

This information is wonderful and enlightening

Just like the Mandelbrot fractal the further you go the more you discover... this looks very much like a Mandelbrot section... beautiful... !!! Intelligent design is God... and all form is 'of God'... consciousness produces form.. amazing time to be alive !!

Thanks for these great clips.

I'm very aware of that thank you!

Wonderful interview.

Great video, thank you DDW

Ephesians 6:12:) For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

The issue is not the evidence, but the heart. The issue is the bondage of the unregenerate will resulting in the refusal to believe the evidence.

There are TWO beginnings 1 - Before Time : It is called the Knowledge of Existence ( ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE BASED ON ALPHABETS & LETTERS ) 2 - As Time Begins : It is the Knowledge of Creation ( NUMBERS, SPIRITS & TIME ) Summing both in Human Creation 3 - CREATION OF MAN ( KNOWLEDGE OF THE NAMES )

Thanks, great content!

Going to check out this entire interview, listening to intelligent people having an intelligent conversation is a welcome distraction. That's for sharing

First of all, great mustache. Second of all, incredible masculine style. The throwback nature hats are sick. Thirdly, thank you for your faith in The LORD our GOD, Jesus Christ. And thank you for helping us think comprehensively and critically about these topics for it is a real blessing and help in discussions with friends who are very intelligent but reject Christ and scripture on the basis of theoretical fantasies that truly have no support. Like a dollar being backed by…… money printers…. Paper thin statements being backed by paper thin rational all in order to escape the reality of God and His eternal judgement. It’s wonderful. Thank you.