Scientist EXPOSES Limitations Of Atheism (3 Evidences For GOD) |  

More rational, perhaps. But equally irrelevant without a compelling case for Christianity, which wasn't addressed.

Nobody believes everything came from nothing. I’ve never ever met someone who says that.

Atheists don't think everything came from nothing.

It does not come from nothing. You have to stop thinking of something and nothing. Absolute nothing was never possible. That's the point. The quantum fields which are probably the baseline of everything can cause a universe to start. Maybe another dimension is involved. Perhaps. But having infinite space filled with universes is very logical. 99% would fail and become nothing and this one worked with correct set of laws for intelligent life.

@@exactopposite That's because Dr. Meyer is not arguing for Christianity. He is a proponent of the theory of intelligent design, which simply posits that there must be an intelligent designer behind the universe and life.

If I believed things based on testimony, there'd be no end to what crazy and contradictive things I'd believe.

I hope to save all delusional people who think a God exist. I am one of few who can see and read the energy from the universe and it told me there is nog god, there was no god and there will never be a god. I shared my testimony and i hope they find their way in this world without a god.

In the original New Testament the « Holy Spirit » doesn’t exist

😅😅😅😅 blindman​@@tonydonders6777

@@elvancor you should go to court of law and take a look how justice is done :D !! testimony is a viable way to know stuff. especially if you try to find truth and meaning through someone else's experience. you hear ones (testimony's) and keep the true ones. as far as you can safely investigate statements that is!!! cause there are allot of trash also laying around. that should not discourage you though to check if the other person is not creasy as you already assumed. you ask questions. and get (testimony's) answers. compare and go on. Gain wisdom ask better questions get better answers get wiser rinse and repeat. that's my advise to you. don't trash testimony's you are welcome to question them though. (thumbs up)

Atheists are vastly overrepresented in science

A claim with no evidence.

@@mr.c2485 Evidence that you wont claim...

@@mr.c2485 There are 66 Books in the Bible that lays out the proof, starting in Genesis, maybe take a look

@@mr.c2485 Who said : "A claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" ? =)

@@B-B-W-Engel Hitchens, I believe.

Congrats that’s a contradiction that makes no sense

If God exists he is clearly an evil jackass monster. Overwhelming evidence for it in today's real world

And where did god come from?!!!!!!!! Argghhhhhh

What was before God? Haha 😂

​@@kresimirzex2720Nothing and everything.

Doesn't do very well under oath though.

"When the Catholic priest, Georges Lemaître..." but the Pope of the time welcomed the theory with open arms because it seemed to confirm Catholic doctrine.

He theorized a singularity beginning, but the term big bang came from Astrophysicist Dr. Fred Hoyle.

Now the science proved that the theory of religious people is wrong... Wait...

He actually presented a theory that the universe came from what he termed a primordial atom. Hoyle later referred to it as a Big Bang.

Wait till you find out how many Catholic priests are scientists.

He's a Creationist interviewing a Creationist and giving zero pushback, at all. Many of Meyers statements are blatant falsehoods, and as always he gets a pass. What both sides?

@@Reclaimer77Name his falsehoods.

@@paulsimmonds2030 He is conflating evolution with abiogenesis, and he keeps pushing intelligent design even though it has been shown to have no scientific merit.

@@unduloid Well, just as 2 follows 1 and 3 follows 2, 4 follows 3 and so on and so on. And the fact that without 1, there are no other numbers and mathematics absolutely falls to pieces, the theory of evolution absolutely depends on that start point of abiogenesis. It is the biggest stumbling block to evolution. Without it, like mathematics and the number 1, it would absolutely fall to pieces.

@@paulsimmonds2030 False equivalence. Numbers are a human invention. More importantly though, evolution is still a thing even if we would have no clue where the first life comes from. It's a typical creationist trick to conflate the two in order to confuse laymen such as Piers.

ATHEISM and RELIGIONS.... NO GOD, NO JESUS CHRIST, NO BIBLE Atheists who don't believe in the existence of God and Gods and claim too that the BIBLE is just a worthless book of lies, myths, fictions, fantasies, and fairy tales and Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, SDAs, Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, Born Again Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and fanatic of all kinds of Religions who believe their own UNBIBLICAL teachings and doctrines about "hellfire", "afterlife", "immortality of the souls", "Trinity", "Armageddon", "rapture", and "reincarnation" will definitely bring themselves nothing but their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, worthless and useless dusts on earth forever. The BIBLE, GOD, JESUS CHRIST, ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE on EARTH..... NO ATHEISM, NO RELIGIONS GOD KNOWS that his favor and reward of ETERNAL LIFE and existence on Earth without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and death as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4 is NOT for Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Atheists but ONLY for loving, kind, considerate, and respectful persons on earth who willingly submit to the authority of Jesus Christ and obey his teachings too about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Matthew 28: 18, Luke 4: 43 and John 11: 25, 26. GOD KNOWS that in the right and proper time, he will let Jesus Christ RESURRECT back to life all the loving, kind, considerate, and respectful persons on earth who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Jesus Christ Followers and disciples, and many others so they can all happily and peacefully live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" or His Kingdom and fully enjoy his and his Christ's eternal love, kindness, goodness, compassions, generosities, favors, and blessings for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.

Amen!

@SirGinger76 If it's so evident then by all means provide testable evidence to show a god to be real.

Why are you Christian?

religion = hate

You can’t unlearn something

Amen 🔥🙏😇✝️

keep fighting for the faith of Islam. you good with that?

​@@MrJetmechJesus never killed anyone 😇🙏🔥✝️

@@ryngrd1 neither did Allah so what is your point?

@@ryngrd1 _"Jesus never killed anyone"_ - his father did.

Evolution makes me question Evolution.

This

What math? This is a legitimate question, not a smartass comment.

@@rhatala27 Maybe a better way to put it would be that statistics. IF modification comes through random change (mutations) I wonder how any population of animal could survive the environment AND the billions of bad mutation to be blessed by something new like a photo sensitive cell or a changing appendage.

@@rhatala27 This same channel had a video called: "Darwin DEBUNKED: Using Breakthroughs In Math & Science" that actually addressed the math - they didn't answer the question, I don't think. But they did confirm the same questions I had.

Yep. And then nothing at all happened during the last 150 years. No transitional fossils were found, DNA was not discovered, genome was not mapped and showed all life is related, no mechanisms of evolution were pinpointed. The god of Darwin is were we at. Are you really, but really this stupid and dishonest?

thats the difference between public and private science, if they showed that quote when the theory is introduced to anyone this problem would've exist

@@spiritseeker2831 No. This is more dishonest creationists misquoting. From the Letter to Asa Gray, 18 June [1857] Darwin actually wrote "I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science." And he was addressing a very specific problem - how to account for the existence of species of plants for which there were no, or few, closely related species.

Dude, that was a hundred and fifty years ago. Modern evolutionary theory doesn't rely on anything Darwin has said or observed, it has its stand-alone mountain of evidence. Also, Darwin himself later saw his theory vindicated with the finding of the achaeoperyx fossil.

@@elvancor they didn’t find anything. They made and certified bogus information. They no better than the little alien brought into Mexican congress or whatever lol 😂

Respect for the open mindedness 👍 A lot of folks get so fixed in their ways that they stop thinking and paying attention and can tune out any new info. And I definitely agree - there is a spiritual realm, for sure ✌️

@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom cool. I'm in the UK baptised roman Catholic but not practising. But I've been more inclined to go to church the more science tells us! I really appreciate your output, really intelligent discussion without evangelising, and yes, open mindedness is so valuable and even under attack 👍

unfortunately there is this myth that science and religion are at odds when in fact this is not the case. I'm not saying there haven't been controversies, but the reality is science stands on the shoulders of religion and particularly the Catholic Church. Also I see your comment about you being baptized, though not currently practicing, Catholic. Something worth considering: the Catholic Church does not have an official position on evolution and leaves it up to the individual.

@definitelynotsarcasm wow I didn't know that last point. My view is that science should be the servant of humanity, not its master as we are increasingly experiencing. We are unique souls each born equal gifts from God or a God and our soul created science and should manage it carefully

Religion definitely gets tricky when there's over 4000 of them, obviously they can't all be right, in fact most of them are going to be wrong, so it's understandable how people feel about religion when most of religion is a false representation of God.

Weird! Thanks for the heads up!

@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom Exactly I'm glad because I watched Piers Morgan and Stephen Meyer speaking together Sunday Night. Piers Morgan is an atheist but he's respectful about it so Stephen Meyer being a former atheist now a Christian and scientist shows how much he's learned. Exactly what he said about how The Universe is clearly designed for us to understand it by the way our Creator God meant for us to live. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college graduate. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't. I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict. Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers. Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word. Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant

Why?

@@mcmanustony I happened to see the notification pop up and clicked it immediately. I think I clicked too soon.

@@scillyautomatic Sorry, I meant why are you “glad”? Meyer is not a scientist but a notorious lying hack at a right wing Christian fundamentalist pressure group. His rank dishonesty and abuse of genuine scholarship (fabrication of quotes, misrepresentation of research etc.) are truly shameful.

Serious or sarcasm?

@@therick363 Completely serious.

@@burgcarli929 Even that doesn’t sound serious.

@@ramigilneas9274 You guys shouldn't be so jaded. Meyer isn't trying to be dogmatic, or win a debate through pithy rhetoric. I enjoy his casual demeanor, especially when giving rational and scientific explanations of things like the Cambrian explosion... Universal fine tuning... The fact that there is no rationale, for life coming from Non-Life, etc. Meyer under sells everything... Which sounds counterintuitive. But it gives him a great air of credibility.

@@burgcarli929 How long was the Cambrian explosion and what kind of animals existed after it ended?😉

I guess that God forgot to write about Neanderthals, black holes...

If a god created the Big Bang it is not the Christian god. Genesis quite clearly states that the earth was created before the stars. Or have you not read the Bible?

“Forgot” is quite a jump. How about just “did not include”. Lots of things aren’t in the Bible. Who cares? That isn’t actually the purpose of the Bible, believe it or not. But check it out for yourself sometime. Start in the Gospel of John. Thank me later! ✌️❤️

@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom Brandon, it is in the Bible. God says the stars were created after the earth. This is not the Big Bang.

@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom so are you just going to ignore the parts of the Bible that don’t align with your worldview?

When Meyers refers anything, he refers to nothing because he is a liar and a grifter. As to your 'new information' that's just false, for example you agree that dogs and wolfs are related? and yet dogs can bark and wolfs can't see new ' information' whatever that may be. Second there is no macro and micro evolution that's not a thing, micro evolution is a way to study evolution on a micro level analyzing how chemistry and physics on a micro level effect changes over generations, and macro evolution looks at organisms and groups as a whole on a macro level.

You clearly don’t understand how evolution works. That’s a textbook creationist argument that is just a straw man.

​@@KaeFwamYep, the usual response, do you??

@@FilipCordas _"see new ' information' whatever that may be"_ Information Science is a real thing. The term "information" has a rigorous, aka: scientific, definition. Interesting that you didn't know this, yet nevertheless say Stephen Meyer---who actually DOES know it---is a liar and grifter. Read his book _Signature in the Cell._ Meyer is smart and well informed.

@@seankennedy4284 Just happen to be CS major with 10 years of experience in the field, but please do explain to me what is 'new information' in the Mayer 'science'. As I said the guys is either a liar or doesn't know the basics of anything he talks about so please explain to me what creationist 'science' thinks information is because Meyer doesn't? Meyer seams to just use big words people like you don't understand but sound smart to the ignorant, but what he keeps japing about has no meaning. Reason he is a liar because from what hear in his publicity stunts, he doesn't really think that the earth is 6000 years old but avoids talking about it because most of his audience is YEC so to make money he avoids talking about things that YAC people don't like. Also he was supposed to testify in the Dover case but since he knows he is a conman he canceled last minute.

Well, you have me convinced. That was really insightful.

@@simoncordingley3122 Good man! 😉

@@dogsandyoga1743😉😏

You may as well be talking to a box of rocks. The fact is according to a poll conducted in the year 2010 89% of Christians have never read the bible in its entirety, but 93% of those polled said it was all true, and the word of god. Think about that a moment. I’ve read it literally seven times from cover to cover and my Bible, which I use to debate Christians and ministers, is full of notes, passages, etc. Once I can get a Christian to claim the Bible is the word of god literally. They don’t have a chance of a snowball in Hell of winning a debate. I wonder how many Christians know there are zero eyewitness accounts of Jesus? I believe he existed clearly, but the gospels were written at least forty years after his death with mark being the first and John being the youngest at about 85-100 CE. Pliny the younger mentions him, but like Tacitus not flattering. I became an atheist after years of research and study. Being the son of a minister didn’t destroy my ability to use my brain, and think logically and rationally, which sadly, few Christians do. Long answer, sorry, but you nailed it. I will add just one more observation. In 1975 83% of Americans identified as Christian. Today that number has dropped to 61%. It’s a dying religion due to its own hypocrisy which young people see. Especially from trumps sheep who all but worship the con man. In my opinion the sooner it’s a myth like Zeus and the Greek gods the better off mankind will be. Hopefully we will grow up and evolve beyond the need for fairytales and all of them will disappear.

You're definitely right. Because you said so. But for all the morons out there, explain why Dr Meyer is wrong.

Nope. That is nonsense gobbledegook that apologists use to try and sound smart. It is meaningless.

​@@reggrunow1460Hmmm. Do you understand what that statement is? And if so explain it without using meaningless words like "apologist". Consciousness. What does that mean? If we are just biological robots, then what is this freedom of choice? What is the mind? And why do we even FATHOM the ability to control it? None of these questions are that of someone apologizing, but simple questions any human would ask. No apologies.

@@reggrunow1460 No, it's an argument similar to an ancient philosophical problem that hasn't been solved. But I take it you never even heared of Plato's cave. A counterargument contains more than saying "no, that's meaningless". Just because you failed to understand the meaning doesn't mean it doesn'th have one. That's the moment you should have asked for clarification so you can understand what's being argued. A proper counterargument provides at least an indication the claim made was properly understood, and points out a problem in the reasoning or disputes at least one of the premisses. You have done none of that but instead opted for a mere ad hominem fallacy instead so Hitchens razor applies : “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” -Christopher Hitchens

@@reggrunow1460 Nonsense, gobbledygook, and apologists are just a compilation of words that stand for I don't know and don't have an answer, so I'll just defile the comment without contesting it.

Which one then, because more than 95% of humanity has never heard of 'YOUR' god.

Seriously, good for you. I wish I could believe in stuff that makes me happy regardless whether it's justified or not.

@@elvancorhave you ever thought that maybe you don’t truly have to believe in every word? That there will never be another world religion. This is all we got. Can you walk into death alone? Would you want your family to be godless and have nothing to lean on during the brutalness of life? That maybe people living on this spinning rock having no idea wtf is going on need this? That judgement will be done? We are no different than the people from the earlier times. Do you think we are the first people to be able to snicker at the stories of the Bible? All of us interested in enough to subscribe to this channel and ponder these thoughts have been to that stage. Everyone else has too. I guess I took a personal step that I see so many doing as well around my age, in opening this most crucial book with new eyes, and it dawned on me. I dunno it’s a very deep subject. It just sucks to see so many distant because I think they are thinking this through the wrong way. Or maybe my stance is very strange.

@@MrCanis4 the one that was wise and powerful enough to create everything.

@@Onice. what have you learned about angels? Genuinely curious

And what's wrong with faith? Also, how is there no evidence supporting the existence of the Abrahamic God? Seems to me you just don't want to accept the fact that God created the universe. Also, atheists asking for evidence for God's existence, well, let's get this straight: they are not asking for God's existence, they're DEMANDING it. Atheists demand God to reveal Himself right in front of you, only to reject it as a hallucination. If you were to truly ask for the existence of God, then ask Him yourself. Literally, that's all you have to do. If you want God to reveal Himself unto you, then request Him to do so, it is not that hard, but you atheists make it seem like it's quantum physics. And no, don't pray once about it and then never again: pray every night, and pray with an earnest heart, for God to reveal Himself unto you.

@@voltekthecyborg7898 Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.

Blah blah blah blah godhead blah blah So how do you abiotically synthesize activated precursors to RNA nucleotides?

Without excuse? EG: All knowing... Does god know what its like not to be god? Not to be "all powerful"? Not to be perfect? You know something he doesn't know. Its a problem! There are plenty of "excuses"!

@@mcmanustony The key question. Stephen Meyers is brilliant at showing how Evolution Theory falls down on points like these. But his belief in the Biblical God is just as bad as Evolution Theory. "Faith" doesn't cut it.

@@GravityBoy72 Stephen MEYER is a lying hack at a far right Christian fundamentalist pressure group…..brilliant? What at? He has published ZERO papers in the professional literature, getting caught cheating with his only pathetic effort. Try actual scientists, not lying poseurs with religious agendas

He is brilliant at showing how Evolution Theory doesn't work. However the case for the God of the Bible is as bad as Evolution Theory.

Why? Do you have verifiable evidence of that?

@@jtapia0do you have ANY evidence that those three aspects of existence came into being simultaneously from.. “natural causes” Of course fucking not

The basic problem is this: You cannot prove or disprove the existence of the supernatural through natural means (i.e., science) as by definition, the supernatural is beyond all possible natural explanations. Therefore, those who engage in such debates, no matter which they take, are basically arguing about nothing.

Short answer to all the questions are no they dont because evidence isnt needed when it comes to faith.

@@bryanjackson8917 Ha! BINGO!

@@TheZodiacRipper Yes, faith being irrational and so requiring naught of "KNOWLEDGE -- certain and true" and worse even, denying of evidence existing right before their very "lying" eyes. Such sorts of the loathsome prove dependably dangerous, as endless (just as now) warring and killing for belief primacy go-forth, to never abate!!

@@TheZodiacRipper So, why all this fuss to show that science is wrong, that it does not know this, or does not know that? What's the point?

Because he wants a relationship with you. So basically, if someone is expecting something from you, it's fair to expect something from them.

The basic problem is this: You cannot prove or disprove the existence of the supernatural through natural means (i.e., science) as by definition, the supernatural is beyond all possible natural explanations. Therefore, those who engage in such debates, no matter which side they take, are basically arguing about nothing.

@bryanjackson8917 well, kinda. If the supernatural can affect things in the natural world, then it can be measured. If it can't, then it's no different than "imagination." But the Judeo- Christian God has "walked with" man before. Therefore, its actions should be measurable. Also communicated, spoken, and other things. Angels also visited humans. God stopped the tower of babel because he was "worried that man would reach him," so he does have a physical form sitting in the "waters above.""

I can't imagine that such a powerful being would care whether puny humans knew about it or not. There would be no point in trying to hide itself.

@@OdinMagnus Right, the supernatural would be able to affect things in the natural world, but by definition the tools we use to determine scientific fact from fiction (i.e., statistics) would not work. IOW, the supernatural would not have to obey any statistical laws or measures we currently use, so there is nothing we can really say about the supernatural world except for the fact that it is not bound by the laws of the natural world!

Ermm. Higher than you think

Yeah. Scientists simply want to sin, so they've fudged ALL this data for years 🙄

@@dogsandyoga1743 you know there are scientists on both sides right ? Science doesn’t speak. Scientists are supposed to form opinions based on experiments and observations. Not on biases.

@@dogsandyoga1743 scientists also said the earth was flat, objects that can’t flap their wings couldn’t have sustained flight, bowling balls fall faster than marbles, claimed to know the number of stars in the sky, also didn’t believe in bacteria they couldn’t see etc etc ! So funny. Meanwhile the Bible had all this information in it thousands of years before man with his limited knowledge found out it was false ! Must have been a fluke ! Don’t forget Fauchi also said follow the science !!

@@h.d.mech.mortenson2098 True. So when those scientists on the other side of evolution either over turn it, or improve it, the science will change. Until then... Perfect example. No credible scientists on earth puts forward Charlie Darwins theory as the CURRENT understandingbof evolution. It has been improved, tested, and updated wherever the previous understanding was demonstrated to be incorrect. New things are being learned daily.

@@h.d.mech.mortenson2098 That's the beauty of science, and why it's currently the BEST method we have for learning about the universe around us. When new information is discovered, science CHANGES. That's a plus, not a minus. Just google incorrect science in the bible, and see why an "unchanging" word is detrimental to said word.

The apostle Paul said that if the resurrection did not occur, then we are to be the most pitied.

@@humbledone6382 not just "we", we all.

They have an intense dislike for Christians and believe that miracles, etc., are just fairy tales like in Greek Mythology or any other mythos. Meanwhile, they accept that the universe invented itself from nothing and that DNA, a code akin to language, just formed over time. They don't study the Bible (and frankly too many Christians don't either), and so go through life blaming God for the evils that men do without ever delving into the reasons for their feelings, thoughts and questions.

I mean, if Jesus is believed to be God, and God drowned the world, killed the first born of a nation, commanded the burning of priests’ daughters, the stoning of children, the impaling of toddlers at the top of the spear, killed infants to punish their fathers, threatened and orchestrated the eating of children by their parents, and so on (leaving alone his thirst for blood and revenge in Revelation and the eternal punishment of souls in Hell)- is that reason enough to think he’s maybe not the best role model? Or do we forget all that?

@@BigIdeaSeeker No. Not reason enough. What are you basing your idea of a good role model on?

Reminder that Time is not a THING, time is the perception of the movement of things. Things, every single thing, is not SOLID in the simple sense, they are vibrating on a wavelength and separated/held together by electromagnetic/gravitational forces. So, the proposition is not that THINGS came out of No-THING, but that wavelengths started at some point and then coalesced into what we perceive as our universe. This aligns with a simple concept of the logos. that all THINGS were spoken into existence and that the very word-of-God is in all things, through all things and by him they maintain their being. My question to you would be...why reject an idea that does fit the observable, in favor of a theory that does not fit the observable? The impetuous should not be to prove God but to prove that there is anything else that fits the need to arrive at our observable universe. Time and again, Science has tried to provide this and time and again they have failed. However, if you honestly step outside the concept of "rationality" and "experience" God by making an existential leap of faith. You will find that he does exist, is working in the world today and does actually care about you individually. You will find that you are a multi-Demensional being who lives both in this "physical" world and a "spiritual" dimension at the same time. You will further find that you were in fact "created" to experience this spiritual world. To ask me to prove the existence of the spiritual world without you willingly experiencing it, is like asking a vacuum cleaning to believe in electricity without plugging in. The vacuum cleaner was designed to be plugged into electricity but would be crazy to refuse to plug in when that is it's designed purpose. If you consider yourself a true scientist, you will try this to prove me wrong!

@@jonbramms3034 I haven't suggested nor endorsed any hypothesis nor theory here. All I've done is to point out how to me it seems plainly obvious that all the talk about the origin of spacetime itself begs the question by being unable to avoid talking about a time when time didn't exist... a contradiction in terms. So yes, I'm just talking about the limits of our languages and logic. And I'm not bothered by the existence of those limits. But you say that time is not a thing... why should I believe you? What you said about the origin of the universe still implicitly relies on it being a thing so to me what you said about things that happened before there was time for things to happen in... asserting that there is no problem in what you say does not solve the plainly obvious problem in what you say. This is not a problem for me because I feel no need to accept things that people say when it sounds like nonsense to me but for you it is a problem if you're trying to convince me. I'm not going to pretend the issue in what you say isn't there just because you tell me to.

You're correct to an extent. Most religions has no answer to the beginning. Only 1 religion and that's the God of Israel, Jesus Christ. The Bible tells us the beginning. Note, it was written 4 thousands year ago. The first sentence of the first chapter of the first book (meaning the first like of the Bible) brought up Time Space and Matter. Please note we only discover this within the last 100 years.

But we *do* know one very important thing: matter is not created from nothing. We have no evidence to suggest that this could happen, and *overwhelming* evidence that it can’t. We know that any explanation for how a universe exists will not include some kind of god-entity because this is tantamount to saying that something *can* come from nothing.

Yes but believers don't follow this basic principle. Aura of knowledge is attractive, to the point that people gonna internalize some ideas at such a level that it cannot be just a belief.

Imagine a thoughtful individual who confidently asserts that when it comes to pondering the origin of reality and the existence of a divine being, the wisest stance one can take is admitting uncertainty. They argue that claiming absolute knowledge in such matters is presumptuous and that embracing humility in the face of the unknown is a mark of intellectual maturity. However, upon closer examination, their assertion reveals a paradox. While advocating for the virtue of uncertainty, they themselves make a definitive claim about the best approach to understanding these profound questions. In doing so, they inadvertently undermine their own position, as their assertion implies a degree of certainty about the value of uncertainty. Thus, their advocacy for intellectual humility paradoxically rests on a foundation of asserted certainty, highlighting the nuanced interplay between certainty and humility in philosophical discourse.

@@lambdanam9844you are ignorant and happy about it.. thats what agnostic means

@@Stafus What? I was talking about scientific discovery.

Any evidence whatsoever would be interesting.

@@downshift4503 But it won't change your mind either way.

@@Mannwhich Of course it would change my mind. I'd become a theist if God was shown to exist. Would I worship the God? depends which God. YHWH I wouldn't.

@@downshift4503 There's only one option! Even Cain walked and talked with him face to face, and still rebelled. Did he need more proof?

​@@Mannwhich The Bible says no man has seen God face to face, but let's just assume Cain did that. I'm sure he would believe that God exists, as did his Dad, Adam. That doesn't mean Cain should worship God. You can believe something exists without grovelling to it. Trouble is, outside of the Bible stories, people don't have these things happen. They have stories of these things.

Aaaaand that's not the case. Information science is a real thing. Information is formally (i.e., rigorously ; aka, scientifically) defined. Long ages of time cannot explain the information----encoded in DNA---required for subcellular processes. It's all spelled out in _Signature in the Cell._ But, of course, I'm sure you can't be bothered to read it.

Macro evolution is pseudoscience.

Actually its you who doesn’t understand his point that mutation doesn’t contain such creative power to account for the diversity of life we see even despite time. Darwin’s simple life theory was also fundamentally incorrect as he believed that smaller forms of life are simple. We know now that even a single cell holds a vast amount of complex information and so Darwin was fundamentally flawed in his biological understanding Perhaps you are too quick to put down the human mind when in truth its you who doesn’t account for the true science and history discussed here ;)

"He still didn’t get it" I'm not surprised.

So god of the gaps huh?

Great reply! In my mind, I thought of it this way: For there to be matter or material, there had to be a conscious mind, with a plan and intention, and then acted on that to create matter and material. As some describe a big bang in the beginning, WHAT existed to go bang? Don’t you need materials,? something explosive, oxygen to feed the fire?something to ignite or something to be under pressure to explode? If There was absolutely definitely nothing in existence, what was there to go bang??

By your lights if chance events are illusionary in that they're fully dependent on antecedent events then you've just outlined a fully predetermined universe and along with that you've thrown out the idea of free will. Whoops.

@@rhpicayune who said there was nothing?

Which god do you know, and how do I tell who is right between you and someone who "knows" other god?

@@tomyossarian7681 I don’t know you, because I’ve never met you nor I’ve experienced some communication with you. But because I meet God every second of my life and I’m in a constant communication with Him, I can tell that it’s up to Him to make you aware of His presence, because, apparently, you’re incapable of making yourself aware of His presence.

@@bvaradinov You are, as usual for the poor brainless ducks, incapable of answering questions. You know that there are other people who make claims just like yours, but they point to different god(s). How would the rest of us determine which one of you - if any - is right?

Well I wouldn't say that but ok I get what you're saying about God's Existence being evident in our Existence. Piers Morgan is an atheist but he's respectful about it so Stephen Meyer being a former atheist now a Christian and scientist shows how much he's learned. Exactly what he said about how The Universe is clearly designed for us to understand it by the way our Creator God meant for us to live. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college graduate. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't. I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict. Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers. Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word. Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant

@@justingary5322 Sweetheart, what made you write this essay as a comment? I mean… preaching isn’t really necessary, acts are what matters.

Evolution is a fact

Folks tales are as bad as Evolution Theory.

And good thing too, or God might have to lock you up if you were breaking any of his laws! (lol)

@@bryanjackson8917 As long as I'm not locked up with him for eternity, lol

@@thecuriouscameras Haven't you heard? You wouldn't be locked up with God, you'd be locked up down in the dungeon with the other guy, who would torture you endlessly for the rest of eternity with flames burning your skin and pitchforks piercing your flesh! But keep in mind, God would only do this to you because he loves you so, so very much! (lol)

@@bryanjackson8917 Yeah no, see, that sounds like my step father and how he always said he beat me because he loved me. He told me the truth on his death bed. It's deja vu right here I'm gonna pass.

@@bryanjackson8917 I guess it's a little better than Allah, who's going to chain us together from anus to mouth, with each chain link the size of all the iron in the world lol

Sounds like you were there, please tell us more.......

@@mikeminnon8285 well, the Big Bang is currently happening. So in a sense I am here when the Big Bang is happening. The Big Bang never stopped happening.

So you are saying that the big bang happened inside of the ever-existing universe. What then is this universe made of?

@@andrejacobs2904 No, I am not saying that the big bang happened inside of the ever-existing universe.

You are conflating abiogenesis with evolution. Evolution does not focus on the origin of the first life, and the point at which we would call some molecular structure life is a matter of some debate. You believing "primordial soup" model is entirely irrelevant since Urey-Miller experiment. You can repeat it if you want.

​​​​@@tomyossarian7681Evolution kind of presupposes that the first cell would have to have evolved from chemicals coming toether in just the right way. If there were no God this would have to be the case. Everything would had to have evolved from the Big Bang, which is utter nonsense. When it comes to origins there are only two options. Either a blind process (evolution), or it was intentionally created. Based on the logical law of the excluded middle things can either be intended (created) or not intended (not created). There's no middle ground. If the latter is true that presupposes evolution; a blind process from the Big Bang. Clearly it's been created. A Magical explosion out of nothing isn't convincing in the slightest.

Kind of like 1 + 1 = 2, isn't that a kind of mathematical truth?!

@@bryanjackson8917 Yes, in a counting sort of way

@@PastPresented True or false: If the sides of a square are of fixed length, then its internal diagonal is infinite, and if the diagonal is of fixed length, then the sides are infinite. I'll save you the trouble to answer this non-counting type mathematical truth question, it is true. And that, my friend, is clear evidence that God exists!

@@bryanjackson8917 Fallacious expression. What's infinite is the number of digits needed to express the ratio, because it involves the square root of 2. It would be more miraculous if all square roots could be expressed with a finite number of digits.

@@PastPresented The real question is, however, is that or is that not a mathematical truth, all of which truths seem to somehow be miraculous if not transcendent?!

Jesus coming is nothing do promise for Human with direct TRY AGAIN

Thank you for.letting me know you don't care to know the truth, only to believe the cult you were raised in. No need to reply

@@danielsnyder2288 truth? did you just ignore everything in the video? HAHAHAHAHA jesus, you are literally the person you are trying to insult. my god.

Please.provide any empirical proof your god exists. Oh yea. You cant

@danielsnyder2288 LOL which atheist cult leader taught you those words??? 🤣🤣🤣. Please provide EmPiRicaL ProOf of the big bang, or of evolution. Or at least evidence that we came from primordial sludge. Please. something! Atheist claim so much that these are facts. I need the evidence now.

Agreed.

@@phild249 I am so greatfull God bless you

I would say that there are two things the observed phenomenon of organisms evolving, and a theory of evolution that try's to explain this phenomenon. Even creationists accept the theory of evolution, and that the phenomenon was observed in nature, but YEC have a super evolution theory that is impossible according to laws of physics.

@displace - Evolution has not been a theory for 50 years. It's a FACT

This video is all about speculation and twisted logic.

@@Rai2M That's Meyer's speciality!

From my perspective, I would argue that when evolution is used to explain variation over millennia... _(particularly when used by Materialistic and/or Atheist/Secularist individuals & groups)_ It strongly suggests/presupposes an ultimate Abiogenesis.

He’s a theoretical scientist. His theories and observations always take science into consideration. What he’s saying aren’t faith claims, what he’s saying is scientific.

Damn right he ain't a scientist.

​@@wichitadisciple9874😂😂 we're all 'theoretical scientists' then! But when it comes to grown up scientists, I'll go with the honest ones qualified to actually comment.

@@wichitadisciple9874 _"His theories and observations always take science into consideration"_ - in the video that we are commenting on, he misrepresents scientific results in a major, dishonest way. No, he only takes science into consideration when it appears to support his narrative. If it doesn't, he is completely dishonest about it.

Read the New Testament for yourself, with your own eyes. Also, you can listen to the many near-death experiences that people have had.

@@donnaadler8390 I have read it, and I pray, and I believe it. That doesn't stop me from carrying the fear.

@@MrAlleluia00 I'm not sure if you have the Holy Spirit in your heart. Pray for that maybe. I can't really judge though, because I have my own fears, but I feel peace.

I did this for many years, Agnostic, Atheist, Mystic, Not in any category. And what surprised me is that by doing this, I came to see Jesus Christ as the seemingly unlikely, yet very valid explanation of the evidence at hand. And that he was telling the truth. To many that will me a ludicrous claim, but thats honestly where the evidence led me, and I did look far and wide, and that to me is still a mystery.

Mother goose agrees wholeheartedly. 😊

@@MR.IGETUPTOEARLY Why Jesus? The Buddhist gods are just as compelling.

That shows the laziness of a religion, where people don't bother to look and enquire.

​​@@mr.c2485 No. They are not.

Or, according to the Bible, light was created. First day in fact. No need to wait millions of light years for it to arrive

How does time dilation affect light? As you move away from centers of gravity time moves faster. So black holes time nearly stands still while even object in orbit have more minutes in a day. How fast is time in deep space, and does that affect light?

Fun fact: That's likely untrue. The universe currently seems to expand quicker than the speed of light. In the far future, more and more of the universe will slip out of our view, its light never ever reaching us.

If God can instantly create man and all creatures and vegetational on this planet fully developed, functional, and fully formed, why would he have to wait billions of years for light to get from one side of Universe to the other? Couldn’t a being with no limitations whatsoever create light that’s visible, and in all points of the universe instantly????

I actually think it is the opposite. Light travels WITH time, so as time passes we will see less of what we now see.

you have faith.

@@emojidinosaur7300 Or maybe hope.

@@PastPresented Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. what is your definition of hope?? what is your definition of faith??

@@emojidinosaur7300 Hope: a bias towards a particular outcome of a current or future process or relationship Faith: an expectation of a particular outcome of a current or future process or relationship (but also a commitment to making an agreed-upon outcome occur)

@@PastPresented Get a dictionary. The more i interact with atheists the more I believe that hell will be an insane asylum.

YHWH = Yahweh 👍

Both are acceptable

Just more creationist dishonesty

he did mention atheism

He quoted Dawkins and discussed the existence of God and a creator. That directly relates to atheism.

@@georgesaliba8876I’m talking about the host/channel. How his description didn’t but title did.

@@user-sg7ru7vg7ldid you even read what I wrote? The description and title. Not connected. If you then add what the channel host person says during the video that’s a third additional. And considering he’s shown he doesn’t understand atheism and science or purposely misrepresents them….oof.

Alternative stupidity is much better than mainstream stupidity.. 🤭

@@tomyossarian7681 take your pick at your choice of supposed stupidity

@@calurai can i have a choice of my pick, please?

@@tomyossarian7681 got me

it does matter, because people need to hear that they need a personal Savior to pull them from the brad road to Hell that they don't know they are on.

actually I think they call that last one "the modern synthesis", but, point made. :)

No, they all neatly merge into the next as more information is discovered.

The irony is that when theism of man-made Gods is proved wrong = I don't care and will still blindly follow😂 Correcting and adapting as more evidences emerges is actually a good thing, my friend!

@@aak2931 Correcting and adapting IS a good thing, nobody said it wasn't. I'll go one further and say that exploring all options and finding out what fails is time VERY well spent. However, holding onto a failed idea "because it had to be that way, because we are here" is tautology, not science. But go ahead and (your words) "I don't care and will still blindly follow"... you have a lot of faith, my friend.

@@danatowne5498 Hey, I actually fully agree with the first half of your statement. However, I'm not sure I follow in regards to the second half because it assumes you know what I believe which wasn't outlined in my original comment, unless it needs better wording? Thanks for your response though.

DISHONOR and ETERNAL DEATHS bring and cause by RELIGIONS Atheists who don't believe in the existence of the GOD and Father of Jesus Christ DON'T KNOW and just can't understand that the UNBIBLICAL and false teachings and doctrines of the enemies of Jesus Christ about "hellfire", "immortality of the souls", "afterlife", "Armageddon", "Trinity", "rapture", and "reincarnation" will definitely bring and cause nothing but the dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS of all Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, SDAs, Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, Born Again Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and fanatics of all kinds of Religions in the world. HUMAN BEINGS WERE CREATED to LIVE and EXIST on EARTH FOREVER 1. GOD authorized and sent Jesus Christ from heaven to earth to preach and teach the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Luke 4: 43 and John 11: 25, 26 2. Jesus Christ is the One given by GOD all authority in heaven and on earth as written in Matthew 28: 18 3. GOD's favor and reward for all persons on earth who willingly submit to the authority of Jesus Christ and obey his teachings too about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" is ETERNAL LIFE and existence on earth without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and death as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4. 4. The teaching of Jesus Christ about the "RESURRECTION of the DEAD" guarantees that loving, kind, considerate, and respectful persons on earth who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Jesus Christ's Followers and disciples, and many others will all be RESURRECTED back to life in the right and proper time so they can all happily and peacefully live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" and fully enjoy the eternal love, kindness, goodness, generosities, compassions, favors, and blessings of GOD and his Christ for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his GOD and Father's Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.

In other words there are still a lot of theories or hypotheses

Time and space came into existence at the origin of the universe, so where and when could this postulated singularity exist?! Wherever its source it logically follows that its originator transcended time, space, matter and energy and that this source finely tuned the parameters of these phenomena to be able to produce life, sounds like God to me.

@@JudoMateoif you already believe in a god. Yeah naturally you’d conclude that. It’s called bias.

@@DM-dk7js What do you call something that transcends time and space, and created a finely tuned universe? I’d love to hear your answer.

@@markreed2563 We are still learning there is a lot to learn.

How do you know that we don't know?

@nickfirman9289 because people have claimed the existence of a god for millenia and the only people who claim it now are the intellectually stunted and the clinically deluded.

@@nickfirman9289 because there is no evidence. Believing something without good reason is irrational.

Your honest answer should be I don't know you can not answer for anyone else

@nickfirman9289 I can. Because I don't believe you know. And in the entire history of humanity only the deluded and the vulnerable believe in a god. And if you had a good reason you'd have said.

It’s not there

Was thinking of these articles as I was listening, he's not very up to date/truthful on the physics/cosmology side of things either.

Narnia is a good one. It´s a great fairytale just like the bible

I recommend any introduction to evolution; a lot of people in these comments seem to know very little about it

Ok cool

I watch “paranormal caught on camera” too! 😮

Fairies created this universe but then some wannabe told people it was his achievement.

Yes. Yin/yang. Good/evil. Now who are the good ones?

​@@mikescollard6499"Are we the baddies?"

Actually evolution does say how a single cell or life started . It says that first there was a primordial soup in the oceans with no life , a soup of basic elements from the Earth's crust and primodial atmosphere of methane , CO2 , nitrogen , etc . Electricity in the form of lightning caused these basic elements in the soup over millions of years to form the basic amino acids which then caused the formation over millions of years of the first RNA then DNA then the first single celled organism then etc etc all life on Earth . The question is however where did the Earth , Sun, planets stars , galaxies , black holes , quasars , etc FIRST come from ? The Big Bang say scientists but what caused that that's the question? Only answer that is not material to cause that in the beginning is God IMHO !

Abiogenesis has never been observed even once. It's nothing but blind speculation at best. And the ONLY type of evolution that's ever been observed is called MICRO-evolution, which is nothing more than variation. That's it.

@@gregorygant4242 that's an argument from ignorance. We don't know how it started therefore God.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

I think it is even more miraculous that you don't know what logical fallacy is, like - just from the top of my head - argument from personal incredulity or argument from ignorance. Who said that staying a moron doesn't require hard work and epic persistence?

I mean yeah 👍

@@tomyossarian7681Ignorance can come in many forms, including from atheist geniuses

@@markreed2563 I agree. Does that mean you will stop using logical fallacies?

@@tomyossarian7681I'm entitled to my opinion, and my opinion seems logical to me based on evidence of how likely natural processes alone are as an explanation for everything we experience.

So what it doesn't disprove anything either

​@justingary5322 Yes, you are right, but the claim that there is no God isn't part of this discussion. The claim under discussion is that God did it. So, just proving something wrong (which, by the way, they didn't) doesn't make their claim that God did it closer to being true. Not one little bit!

ATHEISM and RELIGIONS.... NO GOD, NO JESUS CHRIST, NO BIBLE Atheists who don't believe in the existence of God and Gods and claim too that the Bible is just a worthless book of lies, myths, fictions, fantasies, and fairy tales will definitely bring themselves nothing but their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, worthless and useless dusts on earth forever. Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and all Religions who believe their own Unbiblical teachings and doctrines about "hellfire", "afterlife", "immortality of the souls", "Trinity", "Armageddon", "rapture", and "reincarnation" will definitely bring themselves nothing but their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, worthless and useless dusts on earth forever GOD, JESUS CHRIST, and the BIBLE.... NO ATHEISM, NO RELIGIONS GOD KNOWS that his favor and reward of ETERNAL LIFE and existence on Earth without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and death as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4 is NOT for Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Atheists but ONLY for loving, kind, considerate, and respectful persons on earth who willingly submit to the authority of Jesus Christ and obey his teachings too about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Matthew 28: 18, Luke 4: 43 and John 11: 25, 26. GOD KNOWS that in the right and proper time, he will let Jesus Christ RESURRECT back to life all the loving, kind, considerate, and respectful persons on earth who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Jesus Christ Followers and disciples, and many others so they can all happily and peacefully live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" or His Kingdom and fully enjoy his and his Christ's eternal love, kindness, goodness, compassions, generosities, favors, and blessings for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.

@@jaflenbond7854 Begone bot!

who wouldnt defend?

James Tour,American synthetic organic chemist,James Mitchell Tour is an American chemist and nanotechnologist. He is a Professor of Chemistry, Professor of Materials Science and Nanoengineering at Rice University in Houston, Texas,one of the most highly qualified scientists in the world,explains the Primordial soup nonsense.

Primordal Soup doesn't explain the existence of thinking, feeling beings who laugh, cry, know right from wrong (where does THAT come from?), love, hate, etc., etc. To this date, humans have not been able to replicate a thinking being from Primordal Soup or any other worldly materials. The closest we've come is a fictional Frankenstein.

In order to have more complex compounds, the self replicating systems would have to be in place first. And those systems would have to be far more complex than the compounds themselves. The source of information required for matter to intelligently organize into said systems for life, must also be present before that as well. Yet no mention of where this critical information comes from. You can't have a building without an architect.

@@Mannwhich Incremental Complexity: The argument presupposes that complex self-replicating systems must appear fully formed for life to begin, which is a common misunderstanding. Modern theories of abiogenesis-the process by which life arises naturally from non-living matter-suggest that life likely started with much simpler molecules and systems. These initial forms would not need to be as complex as current self-replicating systems. Over time, through natural processes such as chemical evolution, these systems gradually increased in complexity. Role of RNA and Early Replicators: One hypothesis that addresses the early stages of life is the RNA world hypothesis. This theory proposes that RNA, a molecule that can store genetic information and catalyze chemical reactions (much like proteins), might have been the precursor to DNA-based life. RNA molecules capable of self-replication could have formed spontaneously from simpler nucleotides that were abundantly present in the early Earth's environment. Thus, the necessary information for early life could have been encoded in the sequence of RNA molecules, which were subject to natural selection and evolution. Self-Organization of Molecules: The argument states that "the source of information required for matter to intelligently organize" must preexist. In chemistry, many processes show that molecules can organize into complex structures without an external "architect." For instance, lipid molecules can spontaneously form bilayers or vesicles, which are fundamental components of cell membranes. These structures form due to the physical and chemical properties of the molecules themselves, not through an external organizing force. Similarly, early biological molecules could have self-organized into more complex structures that eventually led to life. Natural Selection at the Molecular Level: The concept of natural selection can also apply at the molecular level. Molecules that were more efficient at replicating would have been more likely to persist and multiply. Over time, this would lead to the evolution of increasingly complex molecules and systems. This natural selection process does not require an initial "intelligent" design but rather emerges from the differential survival and reproduction of molecules. Analogies and their Limits: The "building without an architect" analogy in the argument implies that complexity necessarily requires deliberate design. However, in nature, complexity often arises from simple rules and interactions over time (e.g., the formation of snowflakes, the structure of coral reefs). Analogies can be helpful in explaining concepts, but they can also oversimplify or misrepresent the underlying processes when it comes to natural phenomena.

@@mr.mediocregamer9653 Yay word salad! Sorry buddy, you can't have a complex structure also possess the capability of assembling itself. That's a separate operation that requires a multiple of things. Blueprints, assembly lines, raw materials, fabricators, tools, power station, receiving and storage yard, grunt workers, and most importantly a contractor, commanding officer, or architect. Matter cannot self organize into complex structures unless you want to imply matter itself possesses intelligence.

You do realize that the performance of "science" is the interrogation of anything taken as fact, or theory, or hypothesis, right? Science is a way of thinking. You do not "do" science, lol. You either look at things analytically with as little emotion involved as possible, which is one of the biggest fallacies of "science" is that one can eliminate their biases. Or, you follow a belief system, and except "experts" as truthful and infallible. Which is historically not true, lol. Thus, he is absolutely "doing" science.

There is a difference between science, histroy and philosophy. All 3 have different ways of proving/providing evidence. They don't all fight each other, they are different ways to tapping into truth

The fact there is anything is pretty mind blowing when you think about it with the right mindset. I used to belive in God for that exact reason. As i aged i learned/ gained more of an appreciation for science and a quote from Richard Feynman always stood out. “When we look to the universe we find it is more clever than us still” . I dont believe in god anymore, and certainly not one we have a name for, and because of that quote I dont miss it at all.

But yes life is a trip

@@all_bets_on_Ganesh Your loss. Not ours or His.

@@all_bets_on_Ganesh ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xIHMnD2FDeY.html Richard Dawkins sits mute/deaf/moronic as actual accomplished biologists utterly traduce his "science" of life from non-life. ALL say it is "impossible that humans will EVER know life's origin"

You say its god because thats what you been taught. In reality there are thousands of gods and you cant know which one is the right one and you dont even know what this "god" is. For all that we know we could be created as a simulation in an alien super computer.

For the god believers it’s I don’t know. Claiming god did it is the god of the gaps fallacy

The question might not even make sense because the universe didn't necessarily come from anywhere. The universe IS everywhere as far as we can tell. The start of the big bang was just the point at which the universe started to change state. The God explanation is no explanation at all because it just begs the question of where that God came from. It just kicks the problem back a step.