This reminds me to my CS1.6 experience on my high school library's computer. I have to look down to get a framerate over 20, and only look up when I wanted to shoot. One of my best gaming experience I've ever had.
When I used to play CS in 2006 every smoke grenade would reduce my fps to single digits. Nowadays I play in 144fps at all times but my reaction time makes me a worse player than back then 😂
@laszlolevente2054 They will just make games that are more challenging, of course. On the plus side I'm enjoying my OC'd 7600 iGPU and I played through _Star Wars Jedi: Survivor_ with it somehow.
When you get to the second part of the game that area you’ll see FPS drop another 20 to 30 FPS it hit my 4090 hard I went from 110fps on ultra 4K to 65 -77 fps range
Your Integrated intel experience is almost spot on to the result when zWORMz Gaming tried to go 8k with a 4080, suggesting it's actually a Vram size/speed issue.
I think its a issue on the games side not being able to handle certain resource limited situations. Some games run perfectly fine...if at 2FPS and some end up at 30FPS with INSANE graphical issues
Probably a lot better because this game has forced mandatory Raytracing and the igpu in the 8000 apus will for sure have raytracing cores as well as having ddr5 to massively boost the performance. I bet these apus will run this at least at 30-40 fps and with FSR 3 frame Gen you could comfortably run this on a 60hz monitor
When he looked down at the foliage there were a few frames that were actually quite beautiful in a very stylised way. They reminded me of some minimalist animated graphic styles.
This game is absolutely stunning, it would be interesting to see if it will run on something half as powerful as a 5700xt with upscaling, once again another very good video.
Yet another game that is stunning to look at, yet I have no interest in playing. Cyberpunk 2077 was the last game to make me excited, and now I have the expansion to go with it, and I am good on new games for a long while. As it is, I have HUNDREDS of other games I may never finish, the last thing I want are new games, especially one based off a movie. It could be great, but I will keep my adventures in Avatar land strictly to movies and maybe TV. And since Ubisoft was the one behind this game, I can only imagine what nasty issues are hidden within or any number of ways Ubisoft has screwed over its customer base in the last decade or so.
@@Sunlight91 cope. Every poor AMD fanboys always called cp2077 an nvidia tech demo, maybe if AMD actually made a good gpu feature thats not a copycat of Nvidia would they consider adding to their marvelous creation
Actually, if required is RX 5700 and it runs somehow on APU, still great job done with game and APU! Also, looks way better than Starfield and have similar requirements.
Don't let the confusing numbers confuse you, FSR3 without frame-gen enabled is still the exact same TAA and upscaler component as FSR2. that is the case for every game that makes use of FSR3 AFAIK. TAA is a different, cheaper method that is made available as an alternative.
I'm going to give this game top marks for technical. I unlocked their 'unobtanium' setting and ran the game at 8K native. It used all my 24GB of VRam and came to a slideshow halt at 5fps on a 7900XTX but it didn't crash. Just kept rolling bulldog forward. I have also played it on 4K Ultra native, was getting just over 30fps and it was a very stable and a very playable 30fps. Long story short, they did a good job with the game.
@@RandomGaminginHD Probably limited by frequency, it has to handle RT etc. - perhaps the cores could OC a bit, but you might need to use BCLK for it, and that risks other things becoming unstable.
I guess the literal recent titles are a bit much to ask from 3+ year old onboard graphics. My 2019 laptop has a Ryzen 3700U (I believe) its a quad core and that thing requires a lot of tinkering to barely get Genshin Impact to run. So from that perspective getting Avatar even at 15-20 FPS is quiet impressive
No, it looks almost exactly as Avatar movie. They implemented lot of stuff from the movies, and its awesome. I only dislike them not using Navi language much much more. Similarities to FC games are with how outposts work and some other game elements. Also currently stealth is broken i think. From what i saw there is no way to stealthy take down robots.
A bit disappointing that games these days don't really allow to set actual low graphics settings, but it's still impressive what can a little iGPU do! I'm curious if my RX6400 could achieve playable framerates in this game....
those really lowend cards are now dead For new games you need 5700xt and newer but 5700xt isn't perfect since it leaks proper mesh shading support so alan walker 2 works there not that great So instead 5700xt 6600xt is actually a better buy
@RandomGaminginHD Since they are dropping driver support for the rx500 series, do you think the 5700xt, 6600xt or 7600 will become its replacement? If the 7600 can drop £40 it will surely become the new king of budget computing. The 5700xt can be had for £170...the 6600xt for£220 and the 7600 for £250 currently...is the 5700xt a better buy?
@@stevenanderson3205 500 series are out of the contest straight away because they don't support a codec/instruction set.
10 месяцев назад
Recently in September i replaced mine 580 with 6650xt 283$ for new one with starfield wasnt that bad deal, but now for 40-50$ more there is 6700 10gb Also i sold mine 580 4gb to friend for 50$ so it was nice deal for me
Hey, I’m looking to get into 1440p gaming. What CPU and GPU combo would you recommend getting to get over 60fps all of the time? Also reasonable pricing
the budget king is no more. from 2018 to late 2023 it has saved many from boredom, but it will now be relegated to a backup and replaced by a dedicated graphics card until the day a backup is needed.
Actually on the Ryzen, you can OC memory even to 4200 MHz with no problem if you know what are you doing. So that 5 FPS missing from the playable experience can be there!
Honestly the first one is exactly how I have played games over the last few years on a I7-6660U. I'm about to build a computer and most of the components range between 400-5000% better. I am looking forward to it.
when its on temporal an the scaling at fixed all yur doing is controlling your render resolution ( so instead at 100% render resolution yur probably at like 20-50% of the render res ). where at if u have it on dlss or fsr it does the something but then upscales it to look sharper.
ever since I've seen this game. I've ALWAYS wanted it. but i have a slight problem. my laptop. i have a windows 11 with no installed graphics card, no this, no that, no blah blah. just how i bought it and how it came. Im not a computer person but my brother is. he told me that my computer doesn't have the specs but he told me my computer has 8GB. i don't know if that's enough but all i know is that he said it MIGHT be able to handle frontiers of pandora if Im on the lowest settings. but i want my game or screen to look like the ones other youtubers like for example MadMorph has. his screen,gameplay, and the game looks absolutely amazing. i understand and most likely the other youtubers have way better computers with better graphic thingys but i need help. ANY help. just reply's or small little things that could possibly make my performance better. if a few recommendations that i could buy that are CHEAP that could help with my performance could be amazing. thanks!!!
Yeah it does. This game wasn’t really on my radar but after seeing the graphics and reading about performance, it seems like it’ll be a good one to benchmark
Honestly with all that foliage and RU-vid's compression, it all looks about the same: a hot mess. The Intel UHD is probably just simulating what it looks like when the humans are landing and you're stood right beneath :D
How the hell is my midrange CPU with 6 cores and 12 threads a MINIMUM REQUIREMENT for LOW WITH FSR?! Unoptimized or what?! This CPU should be able to handle the vast majority of stuff at ULTRA or at least HIGH with 60fps and NO FSR...
I must be the only one that thinks that the graphics look underwhelming. 😅 Maybe because I think Horizon Forbidden West looks bettter or because I don't think Ubisoft has the talent anymore after Rayman 2.
That’s how I felt when I watched the GTA VI trailer. Just looks to me like Rockstar don’t have a single clue what they’re doing anymore. Game looks like it dropped in 2014, it’s a joke.
@@tate3117 If you think GTA VI looks good, I honestly have no idea what to tell you except that you might want to book an eye test, kiddo. But I’ll bite. Dragon Age: Inquisition. Wolfenstein: The New Order. CoD: Advanced Warfare. The Evil Within. All of those games came out in 2014, and every one of them looked better than the tragic mess that is GTA VI and its decade old visuals. Hope those new glasses work out for you, bud.
@@tate3117 Literally does, though. You’re just embarrassed because you actually thought GTA VI looked good with those weak graphics. I get it, it’s ok. But you can take your L now, little guy.
