Batman: Arkham Origins - Anarky (Most Wanted Walkthrough) 

Anarky thinks that his way of peace can work which is killing ,destroying,blowing bombs but batman has his rule which is not killing ra 'sal ghul also thinks that killing can make peace there not evil just want everything to be in there own way but batman doesn't want that cause sometimes they fail in there plan kill inocent people also

In the Frank Miller "Return of the Dark Knight" comic/animated release, psychiatrist Bartholomew Wolper said the supervillians Batman fights were "narcissistic proxies", and that Batman was creating these psychotics with his ongoing war on crime. Wolper wound up getting killed though, interesting to see someone else argue the same idea.

True - but that does afford Anarky a certain credit, in a sense. He predicted the legend of Batman before anybody, even the Joker, saw what he could really do, and what he would come to represent. This "voice of the people" may be a perversion of his peoples' values, but you can't say he didn't know the crowd he was playing towards - he knew they would gravitate to a hero, both citizen and criminal alike, and sure enough, the hero trailed anarchy in his wake. He may not have lasted as a main-stay of the rogues gallery - but he's almost become something of a criminal prophet, who saw Batman not as the man, but as the people he would embody.

Tell that to the assassins...

I just wish they would've saved him for Arkham Knight.. y'know, the one that takes place in an anarchistic, and abandoned city?

Haha kinda like Detroit, become human.

@@carelpiong8973 What?

@@theplaystationboy9092 I know that

Sam and then blows him up

I like that BAV did that.

That would be interesting, It really would! 😁👍😁👍😁👍😁

That’s like, a big problem of batman. He doesn’t reform. Much like the punisher, he believes that criminals have no capability of redemption and change. He will literally break a person’s spine for stealing from a corner store because their daughter is gonna die and needs money for a surgery. He sends criminals into jail without caring about how much worse they turn out after it.

@@Isiauwuehrifi eh, it really depends on what version of Batman your consuming.

Thats litteraly what happens in the comics with anarky he goes to jail comes back does things and foes back to jail just like any other batman villain

Look at what azrael did tho

+Ryan Masters Yeah, they kinda fall under the people who have acceptable ideologies that are hindered by the means they're willing to go to have them realized.

+Yang Xiao Long Agreed

hell yes. Anarky was right in his conversations. all his lines were true

+stemikey You clearly have no idea what socialism is. And your conspiracy about Warner Bros is batshit insane. The Democrats are 100% anti-socialist. And socialism isn't the government controlling the economy. That's state capitalism. You also apparently don't know the difference between personal and private property. Do libertarians even try to educate themselves on alternate views? Or are you all too busy fuming over the existence of a welfare state?

i agree

Lol

It was mentioned by Aaron Cash that no one has seen him since and no one knew where they kept him

@@advisedgnu69backup72 wasn't he the one at the cafe at the start of the game?

@@hoomonke689 it wasn’t him in the cafe, after Arkham Origins his whereabouts were unknown

@@hoomonke689 according to the game files thats actually jason todd

Maybe he couldn't reply because deep down he knew Anarky was right.....

sawson9992 this was early batman. I'd like to think he was more harsh in the beginning. He took no chances. That's the idea they were trying to get to here.

Bakunin oooh, very good point

So, no 1 has anything to say about Anarky men??

sawson9992...A hundred years ago, the terrorists of the day were the Anarchists. This rambling kid is no different. He planted bombs, intending to kill people. Batman stands for law and order.

Carson McDonald As in if the world was like it is in this game you would join his cause? I know I would.

Well the thing is that although he's on the right track, the way he tries to prove his points is where it all goes wrong. Maybe if he tried better methods, his message would actually get across to people.

@@carson3140 has a godamn terrorist. They all think they are doing right and are justifies, none of them are. As soon as you plan on blowing people up any point you makes goes down the shitter.

@@UnknownShadow360 What are we suppose to do when a violent entity such as the U.S. gouvernment is destroying our planet and smashing all hopes of real social justice ? People would still be living under autoritarian monarchies if people wouldn't have kill kings and burning castles. Putting down a sick system is actually a gift for humanity.

@@94matheo We live in the 21st Century now. Those methods are no longer acceptable. Anarky’s method was to blow up the entire city. It might as well be what Putin is doing to Ukraine. He doesn’t care about the lives of innocent civilians he kills. That is not the way. Anarky’s talk of corruption is correct, but then he lays blame on those who don’t have the strength or means to fight. You really expect a parent with a family to take care of to put their lives (and their family’s lives) in danger just to fight a losing fight? Are you really going to kill a working civilian standing in your way who did nothing wrong except work and try to feed their family? That was what the thugs who targeted and killed random police in the name of “justice for George Floyd” did. That was what the January 6 rioters did to the Capitol Hill guards because they were upset with an election result. Anarky is named as such for a reason.

So true

True. I miss him.

I think he is two face son they both the same both fight people at same place

I know right he would of fit in perfectly in the game and my opinion copperhead as well

He is. At the beginning of the game where you are in the diner, the guy smoking is believed to be Anarky. Responsible for releasing Scarecrow's gasses into the diner. It's even clear that it is Anarky, due to the fact that there is an Anarky symbol, right next to him on the table.

YOU can't believe people don't know he's Lonnie Machin? *•I•* can't believe that's Matt Mercer (Chrom, McCree, Jotaro Kujo) voicing him. Just... damn...

He's also Joker's son.

@@christopherallen3933 Unconfirmed in the Arkhamverse.

@@TheBanishedWind Still could be.

@@christopherallen3933 "Could be" is not "is definitely" so frankly I'd rather wait until it's official first.

+ES21007 I don't think it's about killing vs not killing. Anarky is thinking on higher planes, in the abstract. His critique is not of Gotham (not necessarily anyway), but of real life. I think this is correct, seeing as how his original creators originally envisioned him, anyway.

+ES21007 yes, anarky does prove a point. It';s like he is his own version of Batman to do the right thing. but there is two things wrong here. 1. he is an extremist. even the name itself spells anarky, the word itself means disorder, panic, choas. Everyone will panic if anarchy comes to play. it will be like the zombie apocolypse has happened. (you can tell he is an extremist and his actions are lead by his anger and hate when he says 'no, they are weak.' (he is very angry and somehow a bit ignorant if someone else does not agree with him) 2. anarky is taking the law in his own hands. thinking that he can do the law in his own way. Batman's actions are not above the law, he is around it (even though his actions can be extreme or unorthodox sometimes) trust me, if anarky does become a ruler if he succeeds, he will no different than the dictators or corrupt leaders he is trying to take them. he will probably rule with an iron fist because of his extremism

that's not what anarchy means whatsoever. anarchism is a long-lived ideology which draws from itself two core principles: liberty and equality. Anarky is a poor representation of anarchy.

If he protects human life. Then why are so many innocent people dead because of him?

ES21007 : blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

I swear that the voice actors are the same I have thought for a personal theory this this character is Jason Todd but it is a long shoot

@@Salemchevy I’ve also heard a theory that Killer Croc mauled him to death, which I hope isn’t true.

yep. pretty much.

You're right he didn't, but my point is he should have helped Anarky after deciding to start getting robins. Plus, we are robin in the comics right now, is just a batman version of anarky's gang.

+Bob jones According to the Anarchy stuff in the Evidence locker in Arkham Knight,he disappeared after the night of the Blackgate riots so Batman couldn't do much for him in the Arkham games."I guess the government doesn't like Anarchists so much"-Cash

+Omar Khater thanks, didn't know that at all since I have yet played arkham knight, only the first 3 games.

Was Robin planning on bombing people and forming a cult of retards?

He is way too underutilized. Also the character The Question. They tend to be written off as cooks, but their motivations and positions tend to be particularly strong. Dano's Riddler is a bit like Anarky.

I agree with anarky

He makes some good points like people do rely on Batman and if he and all the bat family just died one day no one would know how to protect themselfes

Also another point is it has been proven that Batman is one of the many reasons Gotham has so many villian I think not sure but I think there's a saying that. Goes we.sometimes create the villains we fight against and some of Batmans villains s are because of the bad choices he's made such as two face

There really isn't conversation to begin with. Anarky talks like a communist that worships Stalin and ignores the atrocities communism brings

Except Jason's voice is Troy Baker (also did Two-Face and Tim Drake in _City_ before voicing Joker here in _Origins_ and going on to play Bruce himself in Telltale) while Anarky is voiced by Matt Mercer (Tim Drake in _Knight_ as well as "High Noon" McCree, Jotaro Kujo, and Chrom of Ylisse)

@@TheBanishedWind Damn bro you know your stuff, most impressive

@@TheBanishedWind troy Baker also did Samuel drake in uncharted 4, Joel in last of us, erron Black in mortal kombat, main charecter in shadow of mordor and indeed joker in arkham origins

@@jukkaputtonen4797 I believe he also did Batman in telltale series although I’m not sure

@@TheBanishedWind Matt is actually a replacement for Troy in Persona 4 as Kanji. They sound so similar

Defiantly! I may not agree with the bomb part but he's still got a great theory of what the world should be. It's just a shame that human greed and emotions get in the way.

Kaltagstar96 I hear you.

He'd be a great person to structure society around if he was a peaceful man. Although Batman isn't exactly a saint to be honest.

Anarky isn't exactly a saint either. All he wants to do is bring down corrupt governments without any long-term solutions.

Alexander Cook That's not to say that he doesn't have plans for the future if his current plans worked. Anarky is a genius, after all. He's probably got a lot of plans to help Gotham City once all the bad guys are gone. He's just focused on getting rid of the bad guys first at this point in time.

I thought it was Yuri Lowenthal for a second

Anarky is a deluded hypocrite.

@@manuelmateo3392 No.

@@vohge He really is. He's just doing the same subversive, destructive actions while painting himself as a moral crusader.

@@manuelmateo3392 He never said he wasnt fighting for his point in the right way just that he had one

@@petewentzfrommychemicalrom4048 Anarky clearly considers himself a paragon above the supposed rich, oppressive people in power. He thinks he's a hero, and by extension, that what he's doing is right. That's why he tries to get Batman on his side, because he thinks they're both doing the right thing, and have ultimately the same ends. Once Bats refuses (through his actions) Anarky considers him an enemy like all the rest. Anarky portrays himself as a freedom fighter, and according to him, if you're not with him, you're against him.

He's in Beware the Batman, the new series.

luniform I never knew that. But seeing he's a lesser-known enemy, it makes sense.

luniform Where they did him completely wrong.

Toby Marrown I managed to track down the episode he was in. Not exactly impressive for an animated debut, I'm not really into full-cgi animated series anyway. At least AO did him justice.

I think Anarky is too complex character to appear in kids show not because of brutality but because philosophy he is following

Anarky17 I have a theory that Nolan wanted to use anarky, but WB pushed him to use bane.

@@biznubizzness4783 I highly doubt that. Anarky is one of the least known Batman villains. There's no way Nolan would've put this kid nobody knows at the central antagonist of a 250 million movie.

@@biznubizzness4783 Bane broke Batman's back. Anarky is a C-lister.

Bane is not an anarchist in TDKR, he doesn't care about Mutual aid and cooperation and collective responsibility, he wanted to nuke Gotham off the map as someone that studied Anarchism, that isn't Anarchism, that's posadism. Bane only made that speech to those criminals to create chaos so the cops would be too busy to handle the bomb.

If your methods are messed up or evil it's still messed up or evil or both no matter how good your intentions are. The road is paved with good intentions.

Threatening to use a WMD to clean up still makes you a criminal. Killing 1 innocent to kill 100 criminals still makes you a criminal. Bombs don’t care who is near them. When they go off they kill everyone. While Anarky might have been right about the evil and corruption… risking innocent lives to stop it makes you one of the one’s you are trying to stop.

@@sunkenobi1501 non violent reformism never got anyone anywhere. Even within american history look at the civil war as an example.

Or bad intentions.

He's kinda right about his speech; we can't let the others decide for us what is right or what is wrong, our freedom is manipulated by politics or other powers. As for the corruption, it's normal he wants to make it stop and stand against it. Most of the people are scared of the consequences of their acts if they try to build an opposition to the power but some popular movements are trying to change the odds and make people react more about the corruption of the world. I don't support the idea of punishing all the bad ones by violence. Even if they have done wrong, they must have proper and equal justice or else we won't be more worthy than the hypocrites and manipulators. Society can be better if we all try to make it change for the best, not for money, fame or attention but for liberty, equality and respect towards everyone.

Dreamer I agree with you, I feel like asking "What would be the difference if Batman was on the evil side?", because he is someone who uses his force to fight for what he believes in rather than trying to make everyone come to the same agreement.

Ricardo Ferrari Batman would have killed those criminals rather than let them live, he's much of an anti-hero, he's most of the time given the choice to end some of his enemies but most of the times, he refuses to let them die. He thinks he can change the way things are by himself but that's impossible to do such a thing on his own, need the support of people to make things change for the best of all. That's how great revolutionists like Che Guevara, John Lennon, Martin Luther King and many others tried, they did it with the help of the people wanting to change the odds and erase injustice towards the weakest. A revolution is global, not personal.

Thanks, I didn't noticed that. You are pretty smart.

Ricardo Ferrari This is not about being smart or pretentious of what people learn, it's about the ability to become lucid and aware of the reality of the world. That's the purpose of philosophy, develop your reason, your thoughts by taking a time to think and make a personnal opinion of subjects or notions without being influenced by the others. It's a goal in life : a clear mind with ideas and values with the will of be nice to the ones that deserves it. That's what i'm trying to do, being kind, generous and open-minded to others.

What? Anarky is great in the comics.

I get what you mean about community's working together to flourish but worrying about other people shouldn't be a main priority of you, in the end you have to make sure you're provided for. If you have the money or time to spare to help other people you should.

This is what irresponsible capitalism get you. Oligarchs who become unstoppable because all because they want more power at the cost of other people effort. Not saying capitalism is bad just that it produces evil that hides and protects itself to well.

Anarky is a hypocrite.

Ultra Fox all ideologies can be twisted to fit a mans dirty deeds

Jacket really so you’re saying there is no cooperation basically today. There are no friendships currently being developed, there are no politicians that have good intentions. I sure hope this mindset hasn’t stuck to you, because what you’re basically saying is just because there’s a few rotten apples in the batch that it’s entirely rotten. You know what fuck you, there are currently people today working their ass off to support their family, people literally make it their job to help people and make sacrifices to make that happen, and here you are tapping on a device which I’m sure that with the money you spent could’ve been donated, ranting about how life sucks because a fucking comic character told me so.

Austin Smith He's probably going to be more older and smarter and hopefully more dangerous

Austin Smith He'll probably be another side mission but not relevant to the main plot because AK is already going to be jampacked with villains trying to tie up loose ends from the last games that means we have to find out what happened to Scarecrow, Croc, Bane, Joker (I don't think he's really dead). Hush, Harley, Clayface (he fell in the Lazarus pit), Shiva, Azrael, etc

His jacket is in an evidence display in the gcpd, and it says after the events of arkham origins he dissappeared. With the quote "apparently the government doesn't like people like him sticking around" but im hoping he'll show up in the 6 months of DLC we're getting

+Jackson Meade nope

Austin Smith there is an easter egg where you can find Anarchy symbols around the islands

I like what you said man!

I think you also need to consider that Anarky is just as bad as the things he fights against. He believes killing people that are truly innocent just because they do nothing? Not everyone can fight back. He sees victims just as guilty as the sinners he wants to get rid of. And the no kill rule is what he uses to seperate himself. Yes, he needs to fight corruption in the system (which I do see him do in the comics every once in a while), Batman wants to be a symbol. The people can use that symbol to empower, to do good things. Anarky just spouts his own propaganda if you think about it. He's almost a cult leader. He really has become like the monsters he fights. Something Batman does not want to become.

zangetsu134 And what exactly Batman did with his "symbol of hope"? You see the results in Arkham Asylum, Arkham City and pretty much all of Batman's comics and movies. When you think about it, Batman is no better than Joker, because he's just as crazy. His insanity and obsession just so happens to be fighting criminals to compensate for his parents' murder. Anarky still makes better points than Batman, and if you stop to think about it, none of those he targeted are "friendly". The banks worked for Black Mask, as did the police(You can actually find a Riddler file with Anarky trying to tell Gordon to get out of the police, because 99% of the cops are on the take). Anarky sees the victims as guilty because THEY ARE. People in Gotham, no, the entire world are lazy and uncaring. They don't want to take action. Batman became a symbol, but he's the only one doing ANYTHING. It takes a few years for Gordon to jump on the "Let the Vigilante beat bad guys and dictate what to do with them" bandwagon. Like I said, Batman is only fighting the consequences of the disease, not the disease itself. Him trying to stop Arkham City as Bruce Wayne is THE ONLY TIME I've ever seen him invest in something that isn't a Batman gadget or something to earn more money to keep making more Batman gadgets. Let's not forget Batman created the Joker to start with(and from the looks of Joker's part on the game, it looks he like THREW him as opposed to Joker slipping or tripping). Batman IS the monster he's fightning. He is the one fueling Gotham's madness. Hugo Strange and Anarky made more sense, heck, Joker has made more sense than Batman ever has.

zangetsu134 And consider that Batman could be considered as much a cult leader as you think Anarky to be. He makes himself a scary messianic figure. He takes in kids and indoctrinates them with his beliefs and rules. He targets a specific group and blames them for all of the world's evils. He eventually makes the entire city rely on him completely, while pretty much perpetuating the conditions that make them need him. The sacrifice of thousands is nothing if it keeps him from breaking his one rule, and never questions himself. The stories also constantly associate him with religious symbols and themes. Also, he claims to fight evil, when often the evil he fights is of his own doing, and he never sees fit to make up for that. Sounds familiar?

Preach it brother. They should just throw Batman in Arkham and let the monsters who he created eat the rich piece of shit alive like the hypocritical vermin that he is!

The way he makes sense, you ask? Bombing and killing innocent people. He's a monster like the rest of them.

Roblox is right. Anarchy has an appropriate message, but his actions are no different from the common criminal in Gotham. And what's the alternative anyway? Bruce throws away the Bat suit and Gotham is dragged to hell by the likes of Joker and League of Assassins? Not exactly a good alternative if you ask me.

Robloxman226 At least Anarchy admitted that he went to far and wanted to do good. I am saying he makes sense in the fact that all he said is true. Also it is funny that Batman in the Dark Knight Returns, does almost the same thing as Anarchy does, gather people to form his own group of masked vigilantes, opposing the government and carrying out his own sense of justice.

Yudaisei0 If Anarchy wanted to argue politics, he could have done it in a civil manner. I agree, his motivations are legitimate, making him an awesome villain, but that's, again, through civil, political means, not through intimidation and making people fear him. He's a fool; his actions contradict his words. He spills lies thinking he's enlightened. Batman stopped him dead in his tracks. Also, the Dark Knight Returns was Frank Miller's reinterpretation of this character; this version is the moral, good-hearted Batman.

By looking at the character and the people that work for him, Anarchy does not use intimidation and fear to get what he wants, because if you listen to his henchman's dialogues they joined him willingly and agree with his view. Another thing is, how can you argue politics in a civil manner, if the system is corrupt. In my opinion Anarchy thought the system was beyond saving and the only way was to start over, by getting rid of the most corrupt entities in the city. If you look at it from another point of view, Batman thinks the same, but to a lesser extent, thinking at the beginning of the game that he is enough to same this city and all other entities that uphold the law are corrupt. Even through he may have been a fool, similar to Batman, Anarchy was willing to learn from other and his own mistakes. For example, he wanted to know why Batman did not let the building be destroyed even through they were corrupt. In my opinion Batman should have tried to reason with him, teach him and maybe work together for a better Gotham.

Thing is, most Western Media doesn't portray people that bring up these issues as normal. They always have to be extremists to make people scared and blame communism 24/7. You wan to help those in need that are homeless or suffering? It's communism. You want to point out the obvious class struggles and how the corporate class just takes the labor of the working class and overall being corrupt and greedy? Communism. Even during segregation, the propaganda was so strong, White protestors that protested the removal of segregation said "race mixing is communist" like my God. I agree extremists are terrible but being complacent and doing nothing while most people are suffering is also awful.

That's very humanizing

Mr. Freeze really only values the life of his wife, and other people can pretty much be cannon fodder for as much as he cares. The only warmth he had in his heart was towards his wife. When innocent people are thrown under the bus with the corrupt, therein lies the problem.

He should have BEEN the Arkham Knight.

Taking down society doesn't necessarily fix the problem, unless you have a better structure to replace the one before it. But I argue that the problem is not about structure at all, but about the type of leadership that is running the show. A monarchy, or any other form of government run by corrupt individuals, will be corrupt. Bad people who are in powerful positions just need to be removed, and replaced by those who operate according to higher standards of morality.

I'm better

​@@phantomblade9167 Then prove it.

Tell that to death messenger cause he sees things differently lol. Besides that I pretty much agree with you.

That's true. Batman regards life, even if it includes the lives of villains. This position of course highly irked Jason Todd's The Red Hood, who probably would have preferred to side with a guy like Anarky.

I think with red hood it's situational. Sure he kills people but he wasn't going too far and trying to blow things up like Anarky. Scum like Black Mask aren't gonna get justice in Arkham and really needed to get put down

I see what you mean exactly. But have you ever seen Arrow's version of Anarky? That's I call f**ked up. At least here, he is a bit sympathetic. But in Arrow, he is just another Joker wannbe who just does what he does for the heck of it.

Incredible Jake the same thing happened in "Batman Beware"... I mean, changing Prof. Pyg I kinda understand (After all, how do you make a psycho surgeon kid-friendly), but they massively screwed over both Anarky and Harvey...

Beware the Batman was still a very interesting way. And I believe anarky is one villain who can be provided many ways. Also origins was just a little more violent

The real anarky isn't like this

So what if he’s right, how is that going to make everything all peachy.

this isnt reddit

Rolyn Georges and victor zasz

@@montatharhayder So true. The main reason I like Anarky is cuz he's just like me in the sense of not trusting the government, trying to end corruption, and freeing people from there shackles of servitude.

@@rolyngeorges7315 I despise the UK, US governments to the point I want to see their destructions

So Anarky was the youngest villain in the Arkham verse

Just to be fair, some of those cops were corrupt, but yeah, he probably attacked the good ones too.

Black Mask must be happy that the Joker died.

Exactly!

He's got a point though. It's seldom I see Batman ever consider he might be doing something wrong. Watch Under the Red Hood. Also, this is meant to mirror Strange's same accusation in Arkham City. In the end, Batman is not the cure, he ends up creating a fertile ground for more crazy nutjobs like the Joker. That's what happens when you let bad guys live and the extremely inefficient law system take care of them(or, should I say, don't take care of them).

Wouldn't be surprised if they somewhat used Anarky as a concept for The Batman's Riddler.

​@@calebgriffy4585if you read his first appearance in the comics there's a moment when he tortures someone on TV, at that moment I realized he was a huge inspiration for Paul Dano's Riddler

Anarky is not a good thing.

For those of you who are just joining, the original commentator meant "Anarchy" not "Anarky" just so you know.

OtomostheCrazy thanks for clearing that by the way cool profile pic

he was like f*** off lol

Anarky>>>>> Joker from The Dark Knight

Except he does have a point.

+G Turpin I agree. His cause is just in my opinion. But I also agree that bombs and killing people won't solve the problems. Only the overthrowing of the elite will, and that can't be done with violence. If it is, you immediately become what you despise.

+G Turpin Anarky's Point: "This is all ur fault Batman. Waaaah."

Crono More along the lines of " You aren't doing anything against the corruption that plagues this city." Or "These criminals are drawn here because of you."

Anarky is not a villain, he is an anti-villain. And he is right... that is why he’s an anti-villain; in other words, Anarky is an anti-villain because he is a special type of “villain” who heroes better than heroes can. When it is necessary for the people, he will do what “heroes” can’t or won’t.