Battlefield 3 : F18 Hornet Jet Mission | RTX 3080 12GB ( 4K Ultra Graphics ) 

but the explosion kinda lame, very gamy

You should take a look at Project Reality mod for BF3. It feels you're playing a cinematic multiplayer

Aged like fine whine!

Good for the time? Yes. Better than some games today? No, forget it. Unless the game is intended not to have good graphics it will look better than BF3

Frostbite was One hell of an engine

I would love to see Bad Company 3, the only times DICE made single-player games with added multiplayer rather than the other way around and both times they hit the mark. I wish EA would put aside the quest for endless wealth and for once do something for the fans rather than the shareholders, but I won't hold my breath.

The good days for BF was before BF3 for sure, the older games where bigger, better and had mod support.

@@MissMan666 really the first two games, because after that they went consoles and it went downhill with dlc, microtransactions, and watered down gameplay

BCB2 ♥ ._. Still missin it

I agree, crazy to think good old days yehh... still seems new to me in the back of my mind

it's such bullshit it's hard to watch. Enemy appears in front while you have ships and planes in the air that scan radars hundreds of miles around. And how did these planes get so close to these friendly missile cruisers, destroyers and frigates. Whack!

@@PipMane cmon brotha it’s an entertaining arcade game, not a true-to-life milsim

@@PipMane Technically they could have flown low to the ocean and likely got close without detection. But really it's just one of those games. The feel of realism without the logic of it and all that as fun is put first.

@@jonny-b4954 such entertainment, whatever it is, Hollywood movies or games, dumbs down human knowledge and twists their understanding of surrounding environment. All while distacting one from the true understanding which can only be achieved by real information. Some of wich are used as tools of manipulation. All of which does not make the world a better place but the opposite. The result is the horrible world that it is and has been, will be. You shall not participate nor contribute to it. By taking part in such activities you do both.

@@replexity In my deepest hopes I wish you, could one day reach the understanding perspectives. I'm with you, brother.

Exactly

Agreed 100 percent. Although I might be biased because it was my first battlefield game it seems as though the graphics were a jump from BFBC2 and it was the first game I had played nonstop to completion.

@@xM4XvPA1Nx Same here. My first BF game to actually play it non-stop. After I left PS3 I still played it on PC. But for example BFBC2, BF4, BF1 AND even BFH which many people didn't even try, are all amazing games imho. I only really felt that BFV was subpar and BF2042 as of right now it's an OK game. But wouldn't call it a BF game.

Multiple player still very active. Come play with us

Yeah no. One of the worst campaigns ever with terrible gameplay, worse multiplayer than Battlefield 2 and the servers were terrible. How new are you?

Say what you will about battlefield over the years, but their sound design is undeniably top notch in every game.

until they start hearing explosions inside the cockpit at full HD lmao.

@@mcgarnacle21 Sadly not with 2042. If you compare it to its predecessors, even BF5, the sound design is much worst. This is to be expected though, as there are no longer any developers on the DICE team who have worked with previous titles past BF5. The entire team behind sound design is completely different and those who were left after BF1 left the studio once they finished their work on BF5.

interestingly the playable character in this mission is actually a she, Lt Jennifer Hawkins to be exact.

@@dunreal3 just replayed the mission and you're correct. I played this on my 360 back on the day and not only I was bad at (hearing) English, I forgot most of the missions from these games. Having Game Pass Ultimate right now on my gaming rig is like reliving every single epic moment this has to offer!

Definitely not true..

Objectively, from a graphical and technological standpoint, just flat out wrong. From an opinionated perspective looking at art direction? Well if you like runway launches yeah this mission is really cool. BF3's whole ambiance was lens flare galore and blue tint though, Bf4 was an improvement and Bf1 probably had the best general art direction. 2042 still has the best general graphics (textures/lighting/particle effects) as much as people don't want to admit it lmao.

@@what.6099 yeah unfortunately 2042 general visual didnt become a saving grace considering that its kind of a flop and they pretty much stop adding content to it.

lol not at all true but i like the nostalgic attitude

Single player in BF3 had special graphics that were beyond what multiplayer had

Good developers retire, mediocre ones have to keep working.

@@birks7506 Higherups are greedy, taking more money and time away from ground floor developers.

capitalism

@@siluda9255 No, capitalism would be about delivering a good product to get repeat customers, not insulting your customers, making a garbage product and running your company into the ground.

@@siluda9255 Lmao found the antifaturd. More like diversity hire.

So would it still be hard to launch aircraft in that kind of weather? If I recall, a ship that covers more surface area of the sea is more likely to be affected by waves. I'd figured the sheer weight of an Aircraft Carrier (including a modern one) wouldn't be as affected as say a Destroyer would.

what about the technicians right next to the plane when it takes off? is that accurate?

I never noticed that! indeed its weird how stable it is.

​@@edust83 No they would be far far away. Some more inaccuracies I noticed below. TL;DR: Its a game, this is a good mission, the pilot did not pass flight school, you are a terrible radar operator, and that SU-27 doesn't have wings anymore. Problems with the plane: 1. The hornet wouldn't be on the catapult without the pilot in it. 2. There should be a heat shield behind the aircraft. 3. The JHMCS HMD (Helmet Mounted Display) is so wrong. 4. When they get shot at from ahead by those two planes (I think their SU-27s) you should be damaged because it shook the camera when the bullets went past which wouldn't happen unless they hit the plane the SU-27 is equipped with a 30mm GSh-301 which would absolutely shred a plane that it hits. 5. Why didn't the radar detect those 2 SU-27s the F/A-18D (I'm just assuming its the D variant because the only other two seater F/A-18 was only ever used as a training aircraft) is capable of doing it so clearly you are a terrible radar operator. 6. This one isn't an issue with the F/A-18D more with the SU-27 at 5:49 it does a cobra maneuver which I have some issues with, the SU-27 can do a cobra but not like that its wings would be gone. 7. The other F/A-18Ds landing gear just disappeared during the carrier launch. Problems with the flying: 1. When you takeoff from the catapult you pull up you don't fly straight. 2. when they were climbing they went at around an 80 degree angle which is a terrible idea I mean sure the hornet can do it but its unnecessarily risky..

awful, I could never survive the navy

lol shut up buddy, they didn't even try to get help to make this video game. No Airforce memebers to advise them on how to make this, so unrealistic its hard to watch

All the DLC was bangers too.

@@Dioxicate yeah no ....

Is not exactly "trying to make composure". Fighter pilots (or acrobatic pilots) use breathing techniques to minimize the G-Force effects over their bodies. This technique combined with the G-suit effects, manages to keep them awake even on the sharpest turns during a dogfight. You really don't wanna have a G-LOC (Faint) during a situation like this.

Your electricity bill: 🤑🤑🤑

@@PaulyM856 What are you on about?! That’s hardly anything

@@PaulyM856 Thinking about it is the very last thing I'd do. You have, graphics, fps, smooth experience and visuals, AND a fantastic game. Your mind can play tricks on you if you let it roam around.

Ace Combat did this many times.

EA

In a way you didn't; you couldn't fly the jet and was forced to watch an 18 minute long interactive movie while occasionally being prompted to click the mouse button.

So do I mate

@@MasoMathiou how does this give you goosebumps none of this makes sense

​@@jirka4344basically the battlefield theme starting at 4:01

The original developers left and the ones that joined failed us with 2042

i mean, it s not really immersive, because it's not realistic at all

​@@Pryme. I actually agree, immersion breaks because of the lack of realism. It feels like I'm invulnerable as soon as combat initiates. To be fair, I feel that way with almost all games that have cinematic on rails moments like these, because you know the most developers wouldn't design it in a way where you can easily be killed.

That flight deck segment at the beginning hoy boy was that bad

😍❤️

I mean, to be fair they aren't even trying to be that realistic. That SHornet carries more missiles than the Afterburner Tomcat.

@@andrewsuryali8540 what the fuck is an afterburner tomcat ur not making any sense

i agree as a dcs player myself this whole thing just infuriates me

😍