I dont really study great britan history but i know 99 percent is male dominated. But i know in Nazi germany, women are forced to ethier stay at home or if they joined, they would be in the medical or sniper team because pls, you dont get a women in the frontlines. And that is not called fenisim but history
this is early access before regular full launch on nov 20 so most people still only have the starting stuff, many additional uniform options are available, including those darker colors. for the starter german uniforms though i would agree that they are weirdly pale, so much that they look closer to the WW1 french "blue sky" uniforms. HOWEVER, it might not be that the uniforms are "pale", maybe it's just be over emphasized lighting effects from the sun making uniform textures look brighter than normal, when they are fighting on the bridge i see lots of their uniforms basically absorbing the rays of the sun and almost shining. i expect that uniform colors look more natural when standing in shade or indoors or on any map where the sun is not glaring and giving us a false impression.
You know what would be cool? A RTS Battlefield game, in which you have a World Conquest mode, and fight on EVERY front of both World Wars, this would mean you have to accomplish dynamic objectives; take strategic points, for example a refinery or pipelines or whatever, kill VIPS, destroy important outposts / fortress, whatever all based on the actual story of both World Wars of course (maybe even an expansion with the gulf war, iraq or a fictional futuristical one) So in terms of gameplay, you can auto-resolve, go fight as an rts game mode, and you can switch from FPS to RTS mode whenever you want, you command squads, vehicles maybe even base building (that would be a little more complex) etc...
What i hate about Grand Operations is that whenever you won or loose the match, the next day will be the same thing. The match dosent affect the next match, there is no concuquences. I Felt like there is no to win the battle
Jimmy P you do know most of their roles were reserved to be nurses, spies, relief support, or either resistance support residing in invaded countries, and not in the front lines.
A Churchill surviving four shots from a tiger at close range, and destroys the Tiger! I'm starting to think EA doesn't undertand what the word realism means.
Is it just me or do Operations seem even less balanced than in Bf1 or is it just the attacking team not cooperating properly? In almost every Grand Operation video i've seen, the attackers always lose the first two days and only win by winning day 3.
I don't know man, you only get one battalion on a map. In Battlefield one I've been in at least two operations where the attacking team can't even get past the first sector with three battalions
Imagine if they did the Pacific too, flooding the beach of iowJima, being on the mountain shooting shells down onto all of the soldiers on the beach, scaling the mountain, fucking epic..
I think the multiplayer should have got work attention to detail. I dont understand how you can litterally just jump over any barb wire fence or other obstacles, I mean what is the point in them being there if you can just jump over ? 🤔 Also I think friendly fire should be an option too, why run in front of your team mate when they are trying to kill an enemy ?
Britain wasn't even in this battle! Much less British women with prosthetic arms wielding katanas... it was the French military who fought in this battle, which happened to be made up of men with both their arms.
311hitwall this game promotes strategy wdym, COD has no strategy, it’s just the way he’s playing he’s just running around and not really paying attention
Why is Nazi Germany using the German Empire flag? I understand that they lose sales with the Swastika but they could at least use the "historical" flag with the iron cross instead, like other games do.
Ww2 the battle of France took place around June 1940 the Germans decided to cross the Ardennes forest going around the French Maginot Line and surrounded the BEF who later retreated to Dunkirk it was a quick victory for the Germans who later occupied France for the next fours years till the Allied invasion of Normandy back in 1944 relieved the Nazi occupation of France.
No, it's not they said that it was *WWII* no alternate history or any of the bs. But, Harry is half right even tho it is supposed to represent WWII it really does look like an alternate history game.
This gameplay is in the Western front, the North African theater is already in game. The maps Aerodrome, Al Sundan, and Hamada all take place in North Africa. In Chapter 5, we will get the Pacific Theater.
its not that ww2 game that alot of People want , the uniforms , the weopons and so on ist not correctly ww2 , if you want a good ww2 game than u have to buy post Scriptum , ist a big Battlefield but with realism
25:30 Why are you mad bru? Like of all the things to get mad about? I understand if people don't PTFO you get mad but someone taking your revive is triggering you.
Imagine back in ww2 they tried to draft today's sjw? Sjw : " sorry that's offensive " Recruiting officer " but your country needs yo.. " Sjw " YOUR RAPING ME !!! "
Is everyone seriously bothered that much by the women? Get over it lmao. The game is genuinely fun and the operations are amazing. Funny how the only reason people ever hate the game is because of female soldiers. Play operations and you will enjoy it. Women don’t make any difference when there are explosions going off every minute.
SJW's, they like to revision history rather than the actual source. Battlefield fans are pissed off to the max, knowing that the Developers did not even consider to put "Alternate History" in a WW2 Game. After the Campaign gameplay... Why the hell are there Tiger-I's in 1940 and 1941? Why the hell are there Stenguns in early 1940? And why the hell are there Shermans and a Calliope in 1941?
