I owned 2016 ASX did 107,000 ks with no issues at all , sold it to a friend 2 years ago still going strong , I can highly recommend them very reliable car & cheap to maintain 😁👍
Hot tip, the Peugeot 4008, apart from the exterior lights, is a Mitsubishi ASX in every other way! Often slightly cheaper then an ASX because of the badge! Love the videos bro!
I am a current owner of both the Ignis and ASX. Both have given no problems. The Asx had a Evap system problem however which Mitsubishi fixed- reluctantly I might add.
The ASX CVT is pretty good, what lets them down is people don’t do the 90k service (which is when the CVT fluid needs changing) with the genuine J3 /J4 fluid. Agreed with the diesel, I see a lot of these with bottom end knocking, EGR and blocked manifold issues. Although I do love driving the diesel with the 6 speed manual, they fly.
We bought an ASX new back in 2013. Apart from bearing issues early on, we have no issues with it. We will be hitting 240,000kms soon and I'm keen to see how far we could go before the wheels fall off 😅
I just test drove a new demo Ignis. It's noisy and floaty compared to the Swift (we have a 2022). However it has excellent all round visibility and will suit taller drivers. It would make an excellent town car. The CVT is perfectly matched to these little powerplants and they are insanely fuel efficient.
Huge fan of the channel, the contents and the bloops !!! Was wondering if you all might do a various buyer channel type videos please ? Like buying from dealer .. things to look out for.. private buyer step by steps and buying from auctions with examples and/or buying from out of state if possible ? Probably specific for the aus market though. Again. Loving the content !!! Keep it up and looking forward to the next one !!!
The Ignis is indeed a fun little car. They do however have an issue with their fuel system, it's very difficult to get them to burn a lot of fuel, like really tricky. It's much easier with Subaru though.
I own a 2015 Nissan Juke. Has been really reliable even at 270k. I’ve always had it fastidiously maintained over its life, and has always been dependable. I know it’s a bit of a “joke” car, but for what they’re worth now, I seriously think it’s worth a look. Especially with the tech that you can get on them.
Been waiting for this video, thank you! 🙏🏼. I’ve been driving manual for the last 6 yrs but now have some Arthritis in my left ankle and need an automatic. But most of the recommended small/medium SUV’s that I like, have the CVT 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
Don't be put off by CVTs if you haven't tried them. CVTs are more efficient which is why they are used in so many vehicles. Car reviewers tend to be biased against them because they don't sound like manuals or the geared automatics. I prefer not having a temporary loss of power which comes with gear changes. The continuous transmission of power is much better.
@@traceycrawford9938you will not have any issues with cvt's as long as it's been properly maintained meaning fluid changes on time - time meaning km or year whichever came first using proper genuine fluid, the issues were mostly with early models and people using incorrect or non genuine fluids, or not servicing them at all
No...I've not found any new car I like yet, it might be that I'm just too tight to spend any money but, show me anything from the last century and the chances are it will be worth considering.
When comes to AWD for towing there are very few options. Scross, Vitara 1.4T or gutless 1.6 1200kg, Kona or Seltos 1.6T 1300kg. CX3 AWD is only available in some markets. Some of european models and varies on market. Suzuki's use reliable stand Auto, while Korean and euro use DSG with its questionable reliability especially if ask to tow >1000kg on regular basis. Forgot ASX in some models.
Kind of surprised that the S-cross wasn't an honourable mention or the YG Cruze put in with the Ignis but even without that still a bloody good video. Next week's list nominees I'd put forward are; Suzuki XL-7 Hyundai Terracan Mitsubishi Challenger/Delica Nissan Pathfinder Lexus RX350 Porsche Cayenne Volvo XC90 Ford Maverick I have a feeling you may have let slip the review car for Friday Adam lol 😂 Brilliant work as always guys and look forward to Friday's video👍
Great video however neither Suzuki has a great safety record in my view. Especially for current models. You can do way better (personal view) Can you please do a video on the cheapest 5 star ⭐️ cars out there.
Love all your videos but the up here and down there just doesn’t work for me. Nothing shows as an overlay and I think it’s just better to say “In the description” or similar. I use an iPad and desktop machine with no overlays at all unless it’s the end of a RU-vid video as a suggested next video.
Hey Adam I have been watching since 2021. Can you do a video about under $5 or $6 k Sedan or SUV( I KNOW IT IS USELESS TO DO BUT MOST OF THE INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS WOULD LOVE TO WATCH YOUR VIDEOS . SO ACCURATE AND INFORMATIVE .SIMPLE AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND ) THANK YOU😊
I wouldn't say the Ignis' safety is "quite good", it's quite below par (Lacks AEB and had a 3 star safety rating in 2016) so I would step up to the Vitara. Also, on Hyundai/Kia, the engine problems are mostly related to pre 2017 2.0L & 2.4L engines with lack of maintenence. The 1.6L's (including Turbo models) and post 2018 2.0L's are generally fine. Their diesels & V6's are very reliable too.
> it's quite below par Only if you buy the "bare-bones" version. The up-spec version is 5 star iirc. The Vitara is good, but massive. My best friend owns one and his wife is afraid to drive it :/ If they had bought an Ignis instead they would have had better fuel economy, an easier car to drive and park and they would both be able to drive in it. Added bonus, in the latest Ignis the back seats open almost at 90 degrees, so you can fit children seats and put the children in, very easily.
The best combined bet here are Suzukis and Mazda petrol. Honda sucks because of CVT and Toyota feels like driving a vacuum cleaner. All others suck because of reliability issues. Thanks for a great video.
With the exception of the gawd awful 1.8 asthmatic Cruze 10yrs ago, I cannot live with a CVT ASX - driven my rello’s well maintained one many times on highway and city - that Jatco CVT is so poorly programmed - the car is unreasonably harsh and loud even in mid throttle - it reinforces everything stereotypical of a CVT. The (possibly same model) Jatco CVT in the Suzuki Kizashi I had OTOH was actually very very good to drive. But I get it - the ASX is dependable and that counts for more for most people.
@Redriven Just curious to know, your previous videos for SUV's for around $15000 suggested the KIA's and Hyundai's range. Do you now suggest steering clear of them, and will you be Re-visiting those videos in the future? Our budget is around that $15k mark and I had both the Sportage and the Tucson as options along with the obvious CX-5.
You guys seem to love the Mazdas my. Worry is that I haven’t can’t seem to find lots of the new sky active ones with high km meaning over 200-250000km that puts me slightly on edge but that could also be because they haven’t been out long enough for people to drive them that much anyway goodnight it’s 11pm and I’m tired
280000kms from Mazda 626. Only unexpect failures, fuel pump and wiperblade motor. Clutch hydraulic failed at 250,000km not unexpected. Was still on original clutch when it went to wreckers. Wouldn't hesitate to buy another Mazda aspecially anything fro. ZoomZoom era which 626 which definitely wasn't
Before watching the video, I feel sure the Rav 4, and/or it's Lexus equivalent, will be here. Adam covered it for the under $10k video (not that you can get a Rav 4 for under $10k from what I've seen...and I've been looking).
Own a Honda with "magic seats", and while they are incredibly handy for carrying crap about the place, like seriously good, they have failed to pull off a good card trick. They wouldn't fool Penn and Teller.
So this is the fat hatchbacks list? My mate has a fat Lancer(ASX) & it's not very good. I mean it still works, but because of it's weight, my same age Lancer GSR Sportsback climbs hills better. They use pretty much the same engine & parts in a lot of areas. I say if you want a fat hatchback, just buy a normal hatchback or go up a size.
Good report Adam - my father and I spent many Saturday afternoon kitchen table conversations about philosophy, classical music, technology and why Japanese car manufacturers became the world leaders in quality and reliability - we concluded that their culture of pride and honour influenced the standard of what they make which is why I’ve owned many Subarus, one Mazda and now Toyota - Australian, UK and US car industries have a ‘she’ll be right’ attitude hence the poor quality - South Korean is fair but not quite there as it’s now showing with their engines - European is pretty poor too - so if it’s not Japanese I’m not interested and I know many pro Aussie car fans will dispute my claims about the car industry but why has GM/ Holden and Ford disappeared …mmmm? - but I also acknowledge par excellence for what we’ve invented in the Medical, Science and technology sectors.
Don't know why people don't like European cars, I've never had an issue with them, well except the two I owned, had plenty of issues with those. Basically a 5 year old European car is due for retirement, and a 10 year old Japanese car isn't even at middle age.
I had to bring a Mazda cx3 to a friend, the distance was only 40ks and the driving experience was horrible, the seating position is too high as if you're seated for a dinner, the mirrors are oversized and the road noise is unbearable. Definitely won't recommend it to a family member or a friend.
