Bill Nye Explains The Big Bang Discovery 

Grey Winters So... are you a Christian as well?

+Khy Maaren Because they are !!!!!

+Stars Nova Well, that explains things, for sure. I fear for what happens when they grow up.

+Grey Winters says the one who couldn't avoid cursing, ending his sentences correctly, and didn't even space a word correctly.

+Khy Maaren Why do some anesthetists act the same when the claim to be better?

Christians seek the truth too. How about science proves if there's different dimensions first or solve global warming before we have an actual or "another" Noah ark deal world flood. Let's solve the most important problems first. Then worry about if your in a computer or not.. Enjoy this temporary physical state

@@MrSeanman30 I'm sure as hell gonna enjoy this physical states since it is the only one any of us will ever get since there is no afterlife.

And where did u learn about science? Or history? Ur mom's underwear

@@zachangerman1490 Learned it in school. A christian school.

@@DevilFrog61 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RB3g6mXLEKk.html yes no contradictions whatsoever

Thats exactly what evolution is

@@alejandrovillegas8204 making up an answer is different than discovering one

U mean like Scientology?

You mean like the Big Bang theory?

Never trust a guy claiming the Bible is false with a bitten apple on his computer

Argedon That moment when you take the time to make a long, thought out comment and get less likes than a guy who wrote 5 words, i weep for thou ;(

MineOf ZeDead haha foreal tho

MineOf ZeDead You don't mean me do you? It's not at all thought out, but from Monty pythons 'The holy grail'

+Argedon MORE WITCHES!

Brilliantly stated.

+kuwait85 Really? Are you that pathetically boring ?

+Grey Winters Are you that socially inept that you don't recognize figures of speech?

Why don't u listen to God all day then

@@herobrinecolt34 he was saying he could or would listen to bill nye, why are you bringing god to the conversation?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U0u3-2CGOMQ.html

jeff guner no its Bill Nye your moms a guy! thats what my brother says and its really funny!!!!

Khristina Platt now it is bill nye the anti christ

good one!!!

Luke Kwon BILL NYE THE AN-TI-CHRiiiiST :D

HomeSkillenSLICE BILL! BILL! BILL! BILL!

where did that energy come from? lol, that’s the big question and nobody wants to answer it, everybody just dodges it

@@MarvelousSquad yeah I posted this 5 years ago and I think about that alot these days. I think it's pretty fair to say the universe as we know it started with a big bang, though as you say the energy must've come from somewhere. Another dimension, parallel universe, cyclical big bangs, god, Aliens, who knows! I learned recently that according to Buddhism the universe is in a constant cycle of infinite expansion, collapse and rebirth. Crazy to think folks thousands of years ago were that close to our modern understanding of the beginning of the universe

yes

@@reefos3590 you wish 😂

Right!

Think ur precious science is that demon. Whats the Bible trying to trick u into?......a happy healthy life. Those bastards

Mr angerman, as a former christian, I do believe God gave us free will. Meaning I and mr memelord have a choice in what we believe in. Also why should you care? If you are right and I am wrong then you get to laugh it up while I burn in hell for an eternity.

@@zachangerman1490 You assume science is evil? Kinda stupid if you think about it.

@@zachangerman1490 The Bible Is the most evil there’s millions of contradictions

People know the truth but won't acknowledge it.. it hurts their anti Christian angenda...They would rather re write history than acknowledge God

That's so americans can understand him :P

David Viscuso Bill Nye is not arguing that the big bang theory is incompatible with God. For the most part, it is only the creationists who are doing that.

+David Viscuso Lamaitre was indeed one of the "pioneers" of the Big Bang theory. Not that him being religious has any significance. The very fundamentals of Genetics were deduced by a monk, a firm Christian created derivative calculus and another believer made considerable advances in astronomy despite the Church opposing him.

What believer did that Church oppose?

+Kamran Kamal Those are two very good questions! Has anyone ever tested the light's behaviour? Of course. That is what science is about. You don't just believe things because someone invents a theory. You believe in them, because you have critically tested the theory in every way you can think of. Couldn't the background radiation come from EM interference with other electrical components? No, because then the spectrum of the background hiss would be pretty random and dependent on the electrical components nearby. However, the measurement of the Cosming Background Radiation is reproducible. It has even been measured in space and matches up with incredible precision to what the theory states.

I agree 100%, but some scientists put too much faith in their numbers. When this is brought up, they say it's ridiculous to think otherwise.

Showakusai It isn't 'faith' though. You can't tell me that 2+2 is not 4. It's fact. You saying that numbers have this capability to lie is just absurd.

Agreed, however why would you expect a GPS to find the garden of eden even if it did exist? It would have to be on a map for a GPS to find it and if it's on a map why look for it with a GPS?

Mike Zito I'm not sure if you're actually implying that the garden of Eden is a real thing.

No, just that the argument of finding it with a GPS is a faulty one.

It was XERB with the Wolfman Jack show

+Mounib Samara That's actually a really good question, and to be honest, we don't even were the energy to create the Big Bang came from. Heck, scientists aren't even sure if the Big Bang even happened. We simply don't know what existed before the universe, and we don't have sufficient evidence, at the moment, to prove the Big Bang or God.

+Blitz Dragon We can't "prove" the big bang until we have a time machine that can somehow take us back to the beginning of the universe and somehow make us able to watch it happen. It's impossible to prove, all we can do is gather evidence to support it. Yes the big bang hasn't been "proven" but it's a widely accepted theory because it has a buttload of evidence behind it. We don't have all the answers, but there is 100% more evidence backing up the big bang than God.

+Matilde Gomez no matter how you think about it, something has to be eternal in order for us to be created. we already know that energy can not be eternal

+Matilde Gomez and most of the evidence are full out assumptions... the universe is ever expanding is said in every major religion long before scientists discovered it

Mounib Samara "no matter how you think about it, something has to be eternal in order for us to be created" How? Why? What is your justification for this statement? How do you know that this is in fact the case? Beyond that, why do you assert we were "created" in the first place? Beyond that, even if I grant you that there must be something "eternal" in order for us to exist, why can't said eternal thing be the universe itself? "the universe is ever expanding is said in every major religion long before scientists discovered it" Which religions have EVER said anything even remotely close to this? Which religions can EXPLAIN how and why it happens with demonstrable accuracy?

Ignorance Tim H? Then perhaps you can tell me how something can come from nothing.

That's the question for modern science! String theory actually offers a pretty good explanation for how it could have happened, but there are other things it doesn't predict as well, so it's too early to call it the winning theory.

Theory means hypotheses which are descriptive, predictive, falsifiable/testable, have been tested and not disproved. Learn the language of science.

@@williamchamberlain2263 hasn’t been proven a fact it really happened yet. Matter can’t be created nor destroyed so you could argue that Einstein equation disputes this and thus created the universe because “it can”. I don’t think religion or science will ever find out where we came from. Better to just stick to everyday life

@@Silly518 matter is converted to energy all the time

yeah i think this is a crucial point. All the creations points are destryoed by the fact that a Priest thought of the big bang.

Apart from the dryer would tell you why it is folded

Believing in God is like not raping or killing a person because you think you’ll be punished in the after life. Atheists don’t rape and kill on principal. Religious nuts don’t rape and kill for fear of Her wrath. God’s a woman, right?

Jake Berryhoe what created the Big Bang? Oh right you don't have an answer!

I Like Changing My Name For Unknown reasons well I am gonna start that and the best part is that you can't DISPROVE that statement either. It takes more faith to believe that a Self made Bang created the universe based on pure accident alone, then it does to believe that some greater power whose origins none could fathom created the universe. And the reason it takes more faith is because their was just to much luck involved, 1. The "Big Bang created the universe at just the right speed so that the universe doesn't collapse in on itself. ( the odds of that are extremely low) 2. the Big Bang not only created a planet that was PERFECT for human inhabitation, but also helped it by putting it in a revolution around the sun so that we could never get closer or farther away from the sun. 3.the Big Bang managed to create the asteroids that hit Earth AND wiped out the dinosaurs, all on accident and all just in time for humans to stand a chance for survival (how absolutely lucky). 4. We have yet to have another meteor strike to kill off anything in the world. Yet you would actually have us believe that hundreds of meteors hit Earth in a short enough of a span of time, and we've just been lucky to not have another meteor shower hit us? And here's the kicker. I don't pretend to know the odds of all that happening, but I'm going to guess the odds aren't exactly great. But if say an all knowing and powerful God were to of wanted it to happen then I could see it happening easily. But I also concede that this outcome is possible through multiple parallel universes, and look at that you have no proof of parallel universes, so I guess we both believe in something we can't quite explain. The difference is, that without parallel universes your belief is literally the equivalent of Earth drawing the mega million lottery ticket and got all 7numbers correct, and no one else did. Mine on the other hand is an unexplainable and powerful being. Created this universe and awaits us in heaven. So I guess here's the beauty of it even if you're right and I'm wrong I'll just cease to exist when I die, meanwhile if I'm right and you're wrong then you have the fun time of spending eternity in hell or you know maybe if you're lucky you'll get purgatory and thus eventually heaven. So basically what I'm saying is that even if I'm wrong I've got nothing to lose, and considering the fact that people have been trying and failing to disprove Christians for Thousands of years. I don't feel to scared.

Sumo So Silly well you can't say you know for sure until you get proof. Just like we can't say we know for sure until we have proof. Also tell me then how does a "Bang" just happen out of the blue like that, at the perfect rate to create a universe? The odds are literally a million to one against the world there ( probably higher honestly) that the Big Bang happened on accident, not counting parallel universes giving us multiple attempts at getting the perfect Big Bang. However there is no evidence to support the multiple universe theory. So currently you believe the Big Bang happened on its own accord despite the odds of that being astronomically low. While I believe in a God( something the majority of the world believes btw "not that its relevant") that can do anything created the Big Bang and set the world into motion. Granted I have no proof, but you can't prove that we live in a parallel universe either sooooo we both are grasping at straws at this point aren't we.... tell you what though I won't assault you for your beliefs if you don't either.

Sumo So Silly but what disturbed the energy? And look at that what if I said that "energy was God, not really a stretch when you think about it, but like I said I'll let you believe what you believe.

Henry Knippling the god of the gaps argument does have a good history for you people.

+Jeremy Paz I beg for a book on grammar.

+Khy Maaren and spelling.

God won't come for his people.mainly because he doesn't exist.

+Khy Maaren you can find one in walmart

+Jeremy Paz I don't get it.

There are some notable physicists that believe in it, but keep in mind that at this point in time, it is only pseudo-science

Some scientists assume that quantum fluctuations, virtual particles or quantum foam could have something to do with the singularity that caused the Big Bang, but currently, nobody knows. "Nobody knows" also means that there is no reason known why anybody should seriously assume that a deity was involved. Not being able to disprove something doesn't add anything to a discussion. I mean, here is an example: I'm your god in disguise. Prove me wrong. You can't? Now what? Does the fact that you can't disprove this change anything?

Tim H I am not American, but having looked at the whole political storm before and after the elections from the outside, I can understand to some extent the reasons for many that did vote for the Orange-Man. The horrible candidates on the left, the bad handling of many "stories" by the left leaning mainstream media, and the insane and emotionally immature actions and reactions by the younger leftists; made it alot easier for Trump. Not to mention the fact that liberals seemed to have abandoned classical liberal principles for more socialistic groupthink ideologies. Not that the Orange-Man is presidential material either. But I am not sure how Trump is somehow influencing the rude comments made in the comment section. I suppose that is what they call Trump-derangement-syndrome? An obsession with Trump and everything he does, and making the illogical conclusion that he somehow influences everything, whether linked or related to him or not.

+MARK KULTRA

Not only to you

Never trust a guy claiming the Bible is false with a bitten apple on his computer .......

Not only to you

@@franciscofunari2343 this was 10 month ago. I have some doubts and some beliefs In religion

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground

It is. People in for example the nordic countries are 90 non-believers and well educated.

Truth and Justice Nah, the Swedish Church is the world's largest Protestant Church.

Teonod Umm what

Truth and Justice Indeed.

Truth and Justice Yet, most people, at least here in Sweden, believe in a higher power. Maybe not the Judeo-Christian God YHWH but a supernatural force nonetheless. You still seem to think that there's a conflict between religion and science and the only reason it's not that prominent in other parts of the world is because the rest of the world is non-religious, which is completely wrong.

Tim H​ It does make sense, use your noggin muahahahahaha

Tim H lol I would love to understand this wierd conversation by talking with you in person

+adrian Titera Well, you may be right. At least it's something we can support with evidence and reason.

Sam McMurchie Your statement is contradictory, and collapses on itself

Tim H Man you're overly sensitive buddy o.O You say wierd and nonsensical things on RU-vid, and I'm simply trying to understand them, but yet you think I'm talking smack, lol whatever XD

God ;)

@@Tony11442 she probably thinks women were created before man as well 😭 when man clearly been in charge from the start. Why you think they're called "woMAN"? Man named everything cuz men has always been in control and it's natural for man to be dominant. That's why we have more testosterone. That also explains why women could NOT be made in God's image because if God is a female why would "she" naturally make men to be more dominant?

Sabi prove he didnt

Henry Knippling prove I did

Henry Knippling lol

Look! It's Jesus! I can't but you can't say we're wrong until you prove that you're right, therefore you have no logical backing to say you are any more right on this subject than I do

Look! It's Jesus! Lol

Everything around you including that laptop/phone you're using at one point was beyond mans comprehension .. To say leave what we don't know a lone is the stupidest thing I have ever heard .....

But we were able to predict a flight path to the moon... and we got there. Soooo ur wrong dum dum

They can predict the weather, though. Regardless, you're talking about observational science and weather forecasts like they're synonymous. When the distinction is quite clear. The Big Bang already happened. Tomorrow's weather did not.

Oh shut up, human curiosity is IMPERATIVE to growth. We would not have the technological advancements we enjoy today if not for going beyond our mental limits. YOU can stifle your curiosity if you wish, but keep your bilge away from others. The whole "don't think about it, its pointless" mindsets will never be of benefit to our advancement as rational and inquisitive beings.

Chris Greenidge so we can rely on an ancient book written by shepherds

I don't think it was by accident. You may already be familiar with most establishment scientists do not question the big bang theory and view it as the truth even though there is no empirical data to support. This dogma within science that is based on a house of cards with many assumptions is seldom questioned within the scientific community. Those that do question the assumptions, run the risk of persecution in one form or another. Assumption #1: REDSHIFTING = OUTWARD MOTION = PROOF OF BB -the very basis of the launching of the big bang into mainstream science. Halton Arp provided many quasars showing vastly different redshifts than their related galaxies. Also, recent experiments in plasma physics were able to create redshifts on stationary laboratory tables. Assumption #2: UNIVERSE IS 12-14 BILLION YEARS OLD Superclusters fly in the face of this idea being that some are a billion light years across and would take hundreds of billions of years to form. Assumption #3: ABUNDANCE The model for the BB predicts the abundance of 3 elements: helium, lithium and the isotope, deuterium and assumes ther is one density that cannot be surpassed. In observation, the abundance of these 3 elements does not match what should be there. Even if you assume the existence of dark matter, there is still not enough of these elements. Assumption #4: CMB -Cosmic Microwave Background Only a smooth cosmic microwave background (CMB) is trumpeted by big bang proponents as conclusive proof of the big bang theory as only a universal explosion could possibly create this. This doesn’t support the theory at all, or at least, it supports many theories and, therefore, is not conclusive as to what causes smooth background radiation. Even still, early BB theorists predicted the CMB to be as high as 50 Kelvin, but later changed their predictions to match observation, which is less than 3 Kelvin. Assumption #5: DARK MATTER EXISTS Not one of the dozens of experiments that have taken place over the 20 years that dark matter had been postulated has supported the idea that dark matter exists. This should be a contradiction. The way science works, you make a prediction, observation contradicts it, the theory should be rejected. Assumption #6: DARK ENERGY EXISTS Why did dark energy come to be? Because, if you take the present value of cosmological constant and the cosmological constant that came out of inflation, you find that they are not the same. They are different in the order of 108 orders of magnitude. Yet, the big bang theorists accept this and simply put in another epicycle saying there is “dark energy” ad hoc to fudge the science. From these assumptions and more, the invention of a neutron star was created that flies in the face of known nuclear physics in that neutrons cannot be concentrated as postulated. Black holes were birthed and are assumed to be real things despite having not empirical evidence they exist. Stephen Hawking recently recanted his early proclamations of black holes saying that event horizons no longer exist. Theoretical physicists have to invest decades of their lives to understand the math created by other theoretical physicists. Many have different theories based on the above assumptions. It doesn't take much to see how this investment in their paradigm must be defended at all costs. Otherwise, the admission of wasting their lives may come to the forefront. There are many other political and religious reasons to defend the status quo.

We are not talking about murder, we are talking about natural science. I used to say and type things without thinking too; it took me quite some time to learn.

Please clarify what in the video does not constitute "direct observation". Seems to me it all does unless you're somehow disputing the use of instrumentation for such observations.

tetchmagikos1 Well, in this video, there is no observation at all. The empirical evidence to support the big bang, dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars and many other fantasies, does not exist. Thinking it does is an assumption, just like all of the fore mentioned creations are formed out of many assumptions. Assumptions do not constitute empirical scientific evidence.

tetchmagikos1 Dennis hit the nail on the head. Do you understand now?

You're correct except on the part of it being written by one person. The bible was written by numerous morons who kept their wonderful little stories going for the children. It astounds me to see people try and deny the irrefutable concept that is evolution and other sciences. That being said, their weak defenses of having "faith" do give me a good belly laugh for the day. Oh stupid Christians... What would we do without you?

+Dysturbed1 youre stupid if you think christians dont believe in evolution. Just because a few higher ups say something doesnt mean we do. Im a christian and i garuantee ive studied more science, physics, etc than both of you dumbasses combined. Neither science nor religion can fully explain our world. At the end of the day its your OPINION versus mine. If im wrong, there is no consequence. Nothing happens. Nothings wasted.But, if you happen to be wrong....theres a much larger consequence. So, goodluck.

+adamjack7891 Considering the majority of people at one time believed in a GOD of some sort but still worked in sciences...Your perception is prejudiced and redetermined something a 'person or science' should not do.

+Nike Raikage Actually science isn't opinionated at all, it is a model which can be supported by evidence and approved by all who test it, whereas religion cannot. Religion is 1 big claim of absolute truth but yet is filled with many disproved claims and errors. If you want to ignore all the contradictions and say "I still believe" then too bad for you. You're just another victim of this doctrine which actually makes you believe reality is wrong and that you'll actually be judged when you're DEAD.

Nathan Yo If you think all there is to life is science then YOU are DEAD.

Just because it‘s easier to fathom does not make it true.

Jeremy Ftw the earth isnt circular and isnt 6000 years old

I disagree. I believe the Bible is a way for people to get rid of their own responsibility for their own actions.. What really is having a religion all about anyway? Hmm good and evil... Get on one side of the fence? Why does one need to chose a side to practice being kind to others? Why? Maybe because they want someone to blame for their doing wrong.. And someone to pray to in hopes they will do the right thing? Or someone to pray to for hopeful outcomes.. Perhaps, someone to take responsibility for things that don't end up in our favor... Let's pray together and ask for this god to let my friends arms and legs to regrow. That's not asking too much right? After all there are a few creatures on earth that are able to regrow body parts.. And we are supposed to be his children right? Surely we are above the fish that regrows it's tail.. Or the earth worm who can adapt if chopped in half? Awww man... You mean the only things we can actually recieve thru prayers are situations that only normally have a chance of 50/50? Hit or miss prayer answers only? Aww man... Doesn't seem too all powerful to me...

@@kimberlykisinger6744 You could not be more wrong

You can't disprove the bible because its not a book thats ment to be taken literally in a physical material sense. Same way you can't disprove The Little Pigs

@_ Chris I really don't know if you are an atheist being sarcastic or a theist trying to defend his position🤷‍♂️

@_ Chris 👍

@_ Chrisoh how silly of me🤦‍♂️

13.700.000.000 year is hard to round down to 1 minute. how is it arrogance to say something happen, that we did not do?

niel nielsen Well that in itself is whats arrogant about it. Humans havent even been around that long. N yer we believe with certainty that it was just an explosion n poor everything was made, a totally random event.

most scientist don't say they know absolute it happen this way, but they see evidence that make them think it most likely did, and they are just not going to role over for other that say they know how it happen with no evidence. by the way the big bang starts with all the energy in one place not out of nothing, it in no way imply there could not have been put there by a Creator. they are just not assuming it did. if someone came up with a test it see if there was a creator behind it most scientist will be haply to test it.

JOnTHeMOnSoon you don't understand the difference between scientific theory and the english colloquial term theory

JOnTHeMOnSoon man, aside from looking up what the definition of theory is in scientific terms as the guy above me pointed out, you might also want to understand how science goes about making any conclusion, via falsification. the big bang is not a belief that we found support for, it is the only logical conclusion from the evidence that we have collected that we cannot ignore or refute. the way scientific discourse goes, when there are many studies that all try and falsify, i.e. prove the big bang wrong, from all different angles (if the big bang happened it would mean this about radiation, about distances, about the rules of the universe etc.) and they all fail to prove it wrong, then the big bang begins to be accepted as a theory. similar to evolution, people have tried to use fossil data, genetic data, biochemical and geochemical data to prove evolution wrong, and they have all failed because all evidence points that way. that is all

***** Bill Nye, the idiot guy knows little, if any science from what I have seen of him. His statements about climate change and astronomy are mostly complete BS. If he knows nothing, he should just keep quiet. . Stars are gravitationally bound to galaxies, and effectively have no relationship with other galaxies. On large scales, many galaxies are moving apart as space-time stretches between them. Other galaxies are moving towards each other under gravity. The BB happened at a point in time, namely T=0. Since the BB created the universe, it happened everywhere in the universe at the same time. You cannot point to a place in the universe and say that 'the BB happened there', like Nye did. . "Big Bang happened right here (and everywhere) next to planet Earth?" Yes, we are separated from the BB not by space, but by time. (Note that the Earth is only 4.6 billion years old, and the universe is 13.7 billion years old) . " If you could also physically describe the Big Bang". The standard model says that the BB was the creation of all that there is or will be; it cannot be described as an explosion. An evolving expansion would be a better term. The BB was not and could not have been observed, since any observer would have had to be outside of the universe, which is impossible; as the universe by definition contains everything there is. Our particle horizon is defined by the BB; we cannot possibly see anything further away from us than the age of the universe; (13.7 billion ly) because nothing existed then.

***** I have explained this countless times to the public during astronomical talks, and they are all surprised about the nature of our universe. This is the point I made which you appear to have missed; "We are separated from the BB not by space, but by time". This is to emphasis that the BB did not happen in some "place" as Nye erroneously said. I quote; 1:05 "There is a place from whence these things expanded" while saying this his hands were moving apart. There is no 'place' from whence these things expanded. There was a point in time from whence these things expanded. We are separated from that point by 13.7 billion years of time ONLY; there is no spacial distance between us and the BB. From our point of view we are at the peak of a limited time-cone which stretches back to the BB. The BB happened right here where we are now just as much as it happened everywhere else in the universe. Obviously, the Earth, Mars and any other massive objects were not around at that point in time. . "Please explain expansion to me." Expansion is simply a matter of competing forces; on the one hand there is the energy of the cosmological constant, opposing it is gravity. . "why would the observer need to be outside our universe?" Because there were no atoms with which to construct an observer, inside the universe. There could not have been any observers outside the universe; and none inside either, because there were not even any atoms in the universe until recombination, at t+300,000 years. Which of Nye's points about the climate would you like me to debunk first?

It means exactly the same, just simplified. This talk is not for PhDs in astronomy, its for the general public who have no frikkin clue about red and blue shifts. People who might think red shift has something to do with your car transmission shifting gears at a higher RPM!! FYI: His statements are hardly wrong, just too simplistic for anyone with a technical degree. But then its not meant for such people.

He's paraphrasing. Bill Nye knows what Hubble saw - you have to think about the audience he's talking to.. a bunch of crazy ass morons.

Tre Gibbs not all of them, there were atheists there too supporting science.

Tim H Uh Mr. Dumbass, ultimate truth can be told by generations after generations and I am that generation to tell people God exists. With of course, millions and millions of Christians in the world. Also to tell your a complete moron. This proves you have no common sense nor common logic.

Tim H Are you serious? I just called you a hypocrite and now your calling me a hypocrite? Your so ignorant, do you hear yourself....? For your information, if you read the bible you can understand that disciples wrote stories about their life with God. Oh wait, why am I talking to a person who can't even read nor understand...?

+Justin Seo ....but the sun and stars still existed thousands of years before the earth.....and the earth is not 6000 years old, especially since the egyptinas and sumerians were around by 4500....500 before that...soooooooooooooo were does adam and eve fit in?

herobrinext9 It was before Egyptians.

Justin Seo .......thats not what my priest said but whatever.....so how did they get to america in time? and what color were they?

If you would stop shoving your religion in our faces we wouldn't be like we are today. Respect us and in return we will respect you. I'm only speaking for the intelligent atheists of course there's always that group of dick heads who iron it for everyone else

It's actually the other way around, if can prove with scientific evidence that God exists, most atheists will admit they were wrong. While religious people choose to blindly follow a certain God, for which there is no evidence, based on faith. This shows that atheists are way more open-minded, because they don't follow the rules an invisible man in the sky told them

You pray for us and we'll think for you.. most Atheists were close-minded theists once.

Leonor Pereira And yet scientists can't prove the big bang THEORY or the THEORY of evolution but you choose to BELIEVE it it.

Proof Gods Real: A book written thousands of years ago when people thought the world was flat. Proof God isn't real:Logic and science

Yes what are the chances of that happening? But that isn't what the Big Bang theory suggests happened. First of all there was never nothing. Instead all of the matter and space was condenced into one singularity which then expanded as suddenly and fast as an explosion. This is where the notion that it was an explosion came from. Second F-22 isn't a selfreplicating organism that can have offspring. So your example is not valid. So yes your notions are ridicilous and they clearly show that you are ignorant about what science actually says.

Pikkabuu We got ourselves a scientist here lmao The expansion of space and matter sounds even more ridiculous. Where did this sapce and matter come from Mr. Scientist? Over the course of billions of years the planets just happened to form and suddenly natural laws came into play and the earth and the sun just happened to to be the exact perfect distance for life to survive? out of all the things this expansion of space and matter couldve done, how did it create life and do it perfectly with no mistakes Mr. Scientist? Take the magnetic field for example, space and matter just made the earth and sun but no magnetic field means nothing can live on earth due to the suns heat and radiation killing everything. How could space and matter make something so important so fast but take billions of years to start life. Clearly it couldnt have done any trial and errors by making little organisms without a sun or a magnetic field because its just space and matter, so it got it right the first time. But of course youre going to respond with time is all it took and a step by step on how everything somehow went in the exact order for life to begin Clearly shows how ignorant you are to quickly believe anything anyone says anyone with a science background, especially when this little theory came up only 90 yrs ago but i can already see that your mind wont be changed and neither will mine so theirs no point in going back and forward with each other.

Zoom I'm not a scientist. I just listened to the teachers in school, and studied science also on my own afterwards. And all of the material existed in that singularity. And we don't now know where the singularity came at the moment, and it is not a bad thing. Saying "I don't know" is better than giving a false answer. As for how our solar system formed. Well that is an easy question and science has already answered that. Sun and planet formation is really well understood so you can check it out yourself. Wikipedia has a pretty good article about it. As for Earth being the perfect distance from the sun. You do understand that there are trillions of stars around? So chance alone would dictate that good chunk of them have planets viable for life at the habitable zone. Basicly what are the chances of a tossed coin landing on its edge? What about if you throw few trillion coins? And BB didn't create life. And no we are not perfect and there have been and will be tons of mistakes in lifeforms. Tons of people and animals are born with lifethreathning conditions and many don't survive even births. So no life is far from perfect. And what does it matter how long ago science figured something out? We figured out how to treat cancer only some decades ago. Would you rather that we would go back to tossing eels and prayers as healing as we did that many centuries ago? Or how about anesthesia? Modern anesthesia is barely century old but alcohol has been used as "anesthesia" for thousands of years. So which is it? Modern anesthesia or just drink till you drop and hope that the pain wont wake you up?

Hahahah im not talking about coins or medicine As for other planets that couldve had us, name one planet that has everything the earth has, oxygen, moon, tilt, gravity, no toxic gases, atmosphere, not similar but same distance from a sun like star cause any closer or farther would cause problems, seasons, ect. By perfect i meant the way every part of our body works perfectly, the way we self heal from cuts or bruises, how our heart pumps blood and keeps it circulating in our body, how oxygen enriches our blood, how we can get rid of waste (urine and such), how we can reproduce, how a fetus grows in the womb, how our body can detect pain in an instant, how we can move any part of our body without thinking, and the list goes on. thats what i meant by perfect and sure there are mishaps but thats life or better known as sin I can go on about the way cells work in plants but if youve taken any bio course in HS or college then im sure you know how complex all of that is and how all of its functions work perfectly There is no way an expansion in space caused that and got all of that right just like that

Zoom Do you understand what an analogy is? And you do know that we haven't been able to properly study other planets than the ones at our solar system? So basicly what you suggest is like staying inside your home without outside contact and wondering if there are other people outside. And again our bodies don't work perfectly. Our head is too heavy for our spine to hold meaning that we get backpains, and tons of things can go haywire which would leave us to trouble. Like for example our own immunesystem can suddenly attack our own body. And again there are so many flaws and bad engineering in us that it points towards evolution. If we had a designer then either he is cruel for designing us this badly, deceiver to make us look like we evolved or really bad at what he does. And again BB didn't cause life to appear. BB is not connected to abiogenesis in any way. They are two different fields of science.

Study a bit astronomy or physics instead of praying to your imaginary friend fool....expanding universe is an obvious evidence for big bang theory .....you can observe that if you have a telescope and some braincells

Darth Maul mable you need to study how many goofballs does it take to try to prove a christian is wrong tell me your included

Let's say the universe rewinds and contracts into the first singularity. What now. Where did the "stuff" come from to cause the universe to expand. No one has explained to me how something can come from nothing. No one has explained to me how "things" mixed together over long periods of time can create life (or the first single cell).

Tim H sure if you say so ,if it makes you feel better go for it

not your average Lmfao did he not just say that the universe is expanding? That's a good sign that there was a Big Bang.

Which god? There are around 4000 in current circulation.

the big bang did

Josefine Nilsson the christen god

Why? Do you know all the others?

ERIK CASTRO Okay Atheist

Tim H sure lame guy you using profanity shows you know nothing angry comes from knowing nothing because you can't proof what you follow read and show knowledge that you are somewhat intelligence.

not your average nice English mboi

what you people seem to miss is that , if science can disprove some theory everyone involved will welcome the new evidence, while people on the religious bandwagon simply resist and insist that everyone should believe in what is basically magic....

Really? Like what?

There is no recorded history of the big bang there is of creation in the bible. This foolish idea is just what man that didn't want to admit that he was a sinner did.

So you say that Creationism is true because it's mentioned in an old book, while the Big Bang theory is not, because it's not mentioned in an old book?

Well Charles Darwin was just a old dude and you listen to him.

Luke, sorry to say that, but you really sound insanely ignorant. The guy who put up one of the most important theories of mankind was "just a old dude"? You are saying that? :D I mean, this is just hilarious. You think that the deity you were trained to worship (same as people train puppies to fetch sticks) exists because it's mentioned in the bible? That is your evidence? That somebody wrote it in a book? I guess then there are also orcs and elves and dragons and jedi warriors and Batman and Superman are all real too, because they are mentioned in books? Oh man... I really pity you.

Eazy TV Simple. How were you born?

Oscar my father had sex with my mom

Oscar still is not the answer I’m looking for

Tim H Are you referring to God

There wasn’t quite nothing. Everything in the known universe was just compacted into a single point in space. It got so compacted, so tight, it burst. Thus, the Big Bang.

'Christianitism'. Oh Lord.

+Michel Haineault Amen. Seriously though, people are making fun of God by calling him some old space guy with a beard. Yet they believe that some magical ball of stuff that came from apparently nowhere with no creation or anything just exploded and made a perfect place called for us to live on. Yea, they should really think..

+Sniper07 Bros Oh, so because you can't understand it/don't think it's possible, then god. Nice. Willful ignorance at it's finest.

+Christopher Roberts Do you even know what ignorance means?

Yes. Lack of knowledge or information. From what you said, you state that basically something cannot come from nothing, without providing a shred of evidence for why the big bang just isn't possible. Care to provide some evidence as to why you think the way you do?

Tim H God created you

***** What created matter, gravity, space

***** ... God did

Tim H God created you.

Out of pure curiosity, if there is no God, then how did the Big Bang happen?

I guess you didn't watch the video then, because he talked about the evidence.

Seeing for yourself is very low-quality evidence. Scientific testing, falsification, peer-review is designed specifically to overcome erroneous human bias, subjectivity, preconceptions & hopes. We know about expansion because we see red shift in all directions, tempered by relative movement of Earth. Many variables come together to indicate expansion, and the numbers all line up.

Seeing for yourself is very low-quality evidence. Scientific testing, falsification, peer-review is designed specifically to overcome erroneous human bias, subjectivity, preconceptions & hopes. We know about expansion because we see red shift in all directions, tempered by relative movement of Earth. Many variables come together to indicate expansion, and the numbers all line up.

How do you know then that "we are wizzing around in a circle so fast"? ;P

elladan0891 lol well we have proof of that I think right? xD

Carl Corcoran I'm just not sure the universe is something you can just "measure" and "study" like anything

So, as I understand it, the answer to your question is basically that humans evolved to live within the constraints of our universe. If we hadn’t, we wouldn’t have survived, nor would we be alive to to wonder why we fit so well into the universe. As for the Big Bang and other theoretical physics like that, it is based off of all of our collective knowledge of how the universe works, and is generally just a way to tie together everything we know. It could be wrong, but we go with it because there isn’t any other scientifically plausible explanation for all of the factors we’ve observed

Wise Words From Captain America exactly there was no matter before the big bang so where the hell did atoms come from

Tim H What created atoms?