Fischer holds the 2 greatest achievments in chess history....winning 12 games IN A ROW against 2 top challengers to play Spassky...and WINNING 20 games in a row!!...against GM's
Nadie podrá jamás superará a Bobby. Porque lo hizo solo, sin la ayuda de nadie. Kasparov, karpov, carlsen y otros tuvieron ayuda de grandes entrenadores, incluso de su familia y el gobierno. Bobby ni siquiera su familia ni el gobierno de su país le ayudó. Llegó en taxi a jugar el campeonato del mundo contra la escuela Soviética de ajedrez. Y les ganó a todos. Además ha jugado el ajedrez más perfecto de todos los tiempos. Por estas razones y otras más nadie le llega ni a los talones al gran Bobby. El único que supera a Bobby es el ajedrez mismo. Robert James Fischer: "EL MAS GRANDE".
Sim estou acompanhando as partidas do livro My 60 melhores partidas. Um nível técnico brutal. GM Renato Quintiliano tem canal aqui no RU-vid e explica de forma mui didática. Já está na 10 partida. Confere lá.
@@raphaelkreutzer8063 Paul Morphy ganaba cuando el ajedrez estaba en pañales. Si Morphy hubiera jugado contra Philidor, o Steinitz, la historia hubiera sido muy distinta.
Usually..we don't move a piece twice in the opening But here Bobby moves his bishop thrice in his 6,7 and 8 th moves!Also a lesson in End game too! Amazing!
Rules like that are totally useless, because chess is a very concrete game. A move is strong, because the move works very well in the current position. Only this counts. Golden rules belong to trash can.
Taimanov was stripped of his stipend by the USSR chess federation after this 'catastrophe.' It was restored when Bent Larsen was beat 6-0 by Fischer in the semi final. Apparently Taimanov was a nice guy, and also a professional concert pianist.
Gracias ❤por presentarnos esta partida y sobretodo la forma tan extraordinaria y adecuada de mover lento y en silencio. Mejor imposible ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🌹👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
AT LAST! A Chess video that I can follow because it doesn't move too fast. ( I do know that I can slow down the speed of the vtdeo, but i would rather not bother to do that, ) This is nicely presented 'Chess Mate'. 5 seconds per move works for me, I have Subscribed and hit the bell. Thank you for this game. I learn much about Chess from watching the masters. _OA
I attended that series held at the UBC (University of British Columbia). Many top rated chest players in a packed room including a Canadian Grand Master. On more than one occasion there was a muted, but audible , gasp when Fischer made a particular move!
Fischer sang legenda, dari awal permainan tidak ada tekanan, hanya saling mengancam biasa saja, dan pada akhir permainan berhasil menguasai bidak G-H sehingga raja hitam tdk bisa menyebrang mengingat bidak H1 yg dipertahankan bobby adalah bidak yg tdk fleksibel, dan kuda hitam yg fleksibel pun dibuat tdk berdaya, itu langkah yg sulit sampai akhir permainan, mengingat sejak pertengahan hingga akhir permainan bidak G-H selalu dipertahankan bobby... Love bobby, em your fans ❤
That was masterful endgame play by Fischer (and Taimanov!) I didn't think there would be any way to queen that h-pawn for white (Fischer). Fischer's bishop didn't even command the queening square. Plus! Fischer had to avoid black sac'ing his knight for the pawn, forcing a drawn, K&B v K endgame.
Seguro qui nadie va a superar Fischer. Gano a todos los rusos, spasky, korchnoi polugaievesķy, Keres, Petrossian, y a Portisch, y al mago de Riga, Tal pero mis favoritos son Karpov , Kasparóv Alekhine e Capablanca el genio cubano.
@@ravindrasapkota8833 Do you think Fischer didn’t see that? If he didn’t there would be no Fischer in this world. Forking was an option but after white gets the rook black will get the hanging bishop at g5, and then with black, in a couple moves, will get back the white knight that’s trapped in the corner at a8. In the end that would be a trade of a knight+bishop (6 points) for a rook (5 points), a loss for white.
@@tehatte3:52 What would've been wrong about White takes pawn on d6 with the Knight? It seems to cleanly win a pawn, no? Instead Fischer moved pawn f4.
Конечно, он гений своего времени!!! Но он играл так как все. В данной партии Тайманов откровенно слабо провел эндшпиль. А что скажете про Таля??? Никто и никогда не играл в такие шахматы!!!
В матче с Фишером играя вторую партию Тайманов в хорошей позиции, имея лишнюю пешку допустил зевок ладьи, конечно, очень сильно расстроился и в результате проиграл всё партии.
Taimanov was a pawn up and suddenly he was a pawn down in the end game. How Taimanov's King wandered into enemy territory and never able to come back seems absurd but that's Fischer for you. Taimanov cannot seem to co-ordinate his pieces into meaningful defence in the end game and lost by the h pawn.
Probably preferred the knight cause its an active piece at this stage of the game and the rook is out of play. I know the rook is worth more, but you can build up a positional advantage with an active knight that gives more value than the material value from trading. Think about why players do an exchange sacrifice, its cause the knight is more active in the middlegame, so they prefer it to the rook. I think more beginner players would just take the rook, and hope to go in to the endgame up in material, and that's fine. If it had been a more endgame or late middlegame position, I think generally the fork would have been made.
