BOEING Whistleblower Reveals Which PLANES are 'NOT SAFE' 

Notice the lawyer didn’t even want to point out Boeing didn’t tell pilots or companies about MCAS. Big clown and working for Boeing at same time. I wouldn’t be surprised if he himself had the idea to kill whistleblower

Yep

Yes, the lawyer is talking like Boeing lawyer not an independent commentator. When in doubt never trust the lawyer over the technical experts .....he is auditioning for a job with Boeing.

The lawyer gets money if the plane crashes

I think he’s wisely skirting a potential defamation lawsuit.

The attorney looks a little nervous?

@@JaneHasGame There was a tension in his voice when he disagreed : its a give away he believes him.

or just fine him for everything he has, and put Boeing under worker/democratic control. it's not just the CEO the shareholders, and more broadly, our economic system demands this. Maximizing profits and ever increasing risk taking. No industry is spared.

The CEO should not be the CEO and most or all of the members of the Board of Directors should not be on the Board of Directors.

@@rdbchase there shouldn’t be a ceo or board of directors. If the company was democratically owned and run by the workers this would never have happened, as there would be no incentive to systematically play jenga with the company and infiltrate regulatory bodies the in order to maximize profits for shareholders.

Every person posting uninformed, irrational comments should be fined. It would really clean up the YT comment section.

@@jlvandat69 👈 mediaeval serf just entered the chat to protect their dear lord.

typical aviation in general honestly

​@@bmw_m4255Boeing used to be a company room by engineers...Now it's a company run by bean counters (since McDonnell Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing's own money and over-ran he management).

Boeing requires Engineers in upper management (Leadership), not bean counters.

Glad you made it out unscathed Retro ! 🥳. .👏

Enjoy your retirement you did your part.

Only one who'd defend Boeing

What do you call twenty lawyers lying on the seabed? A good start.......

@@charlestoast4051I don’t get this one, Charles.

Educate yourself and learn that ONLY a living soul has a name in Mixed Case Letters CORPORATIONS - being DEAD entities { CORPUS } have the name in ALL CAPS - as do the CORPSES in the Cemetery ALL CORPORATE { Legal } names are always written in the ALL CAPS iteration. Learn correct grammatical legal English Also learn that there is a difference in meaning between Given Name and Family Name -- compared to FIRST NAME and LAST NAME Now go and do your homework - then write an essay explaining the reasoning in the difference. I can also guarantee that you have not yet learned the difference in meaning between ON / OFF and on / off and in which context they are used. Your education is at best - elementary level

​ @andrew_koala2974 educate yourself proper nouns use capital first letters. I bet you're a soveriegn citizen and believe that the earth is flat.

@@andrew_koala2974Retard. Go comment about UFO’s again.

No way that man killed himself. He died just like Mr. Ihaveanislandwithlittlegirlsforyou. When muckety muck politicians are involved, and I have no doubt some are deeply involved with Boeing, people have a tendency to disappear when they can expose these politicians.

Boeing quality manager is who I believe.

737 Max is fine. MCA was a really stupid thing. It is also true that neither of those crashes should’ve happened. The pilot should be able to recover the plane, especially the second time notice no crashes by any first world airlines

The lawyer defined an unsafe airplane, then says its an okay safe plane to fly. A good example of lawyers speak out of both sides of their mouth.

​@@mcamp9445What is a first world airline never heard that expression

I wouldn't trust a Jew at all. They even tell the world there's no genocide in Gaza.

Self-regulation is no regulation.

Explain the legal difference between Innocent and Not Guilty. Explain how the use of these words alter a situation. This is your homework project in the study of Law.

@@andrew_koala2974 What about Guilt Not Proven?

@@hoilst265 Not guilty is a legal concept that, while you may indeed by guilty, the evidence or the presentation of the facts were not sufficient to reach a guilty verdict. The rules surrounding a finding of guilt vary depending on the case from: 1. a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not, typically 51%). 2. Clear and convincing evidence (somewhere around 75%). 3. Beyond a reasonable doubt (around 90-95%). And they apply based on whether a case is civil or criminal and the severity of the case, e.g. shop lifting vs 1st degree murder.

Sad, but likely true!

Whenever accounts take charge quality and pride drop through the floor.

Shareholders returns takes priority over quality

@@TheGecko213 More like bank interest : when McDonald Douglas got taken over, the debt, and interest payments, fell onto Boeing. No one at Boeing realized how bad MD was. The effect can be expected to escalate with time as each part of the Boeing aircraft gets updated. If the interest isn't paid, the company will be declared bankrupt. Boeing should simply have waited for MD to go bankrupt, and pick up at cents to the dollar, anything of interest.

Boeing has another issue. Unions. I can't count the number of stories of terrible workers that can't be sacked because everything is unionized. For instance one guy would do everything, all day long like he was at half speed. He was literally watched every single day, walk everywhere in slow motion, do everything in slow motion etc. When the end of shift signal was given he was one of the fastest moving people and at the door before most others. There is story after story of couldn't care less attitudes in workers. Not only that, management is whacked. I have a friend that was a physicist by training and had an interest in materials science and building planes (but his actual job was avionics QA). He and a couple other guys figured out a cool way to build a much stronger panel for the outer layer of the plane. They even tested it with the infamous chicken gun. It blew away all other Boeing designs by a long ways. So, having this awesome new panel technology is a good thing for Boeing, right? No. They were disciplined for doing it because they were in WA and this type of work is supposed to be done in Kansas. Since they were not in Kansas it didn't matter that they had produced this really good design, what mattered to management was the adherence to the agreements with the unions etc. It's so insane you can't make this stuff up.

If it were criminal, the corporate thugs would be under arrest. Nationalize Boeing now!

It's not just about profit, they've put DEI above safety and quality and they've pushed DEI onto their suppliers. I worked for one of their suppliers and I've seen their quality go into the toilet.

@@pantera01971 No way I am booking a flight on Boeing aircraft.

@@jerrypolverino6025 The supplier I worked for is a big name in the aircraft Industrie and they make components for all manufactures, not just Boeing. Unfortunately, I don't see anything changing until these companies are held accountable in a meaningful way and that's not likely to happen until a plane crashes and the cause is traced back to their negligence.

@@pantera01971 I suspect the incident which will cause changes will be worse : a midway airframe failure causing the loss of all, is one of the possibilities.

Agree 💯.

He IS a pilot.. and we DID invite Boeing .. but no answer

@@matthewmoore5020 Given Boeing are currently fighting a legal action, they dare not appear : a single remark might cost them both public support and millions.

i believe they did say he was a pilot

he obviously got paid

Boeing bought out with their own money : bank interest crushing all over interest.

Most CEOs of these multinationals are all the same. Bean counters with an MBA

rather a rivet counter than a bean counter

They don't learn.

@@scruffscrofula Their determined not too. When $ is your sole interest, your thinking is no different than an arms manufacturer.

*effect

Boeing bought out with their own money : bank interest crushing all over interest.

DEI hiring practices.

Exactly 😱

Clarence Thomas Robert Menend, et al

DEI woke policies

Exactly ! ....... and no outside enemy !

@@istra70 Correct...no outside enemies destroy a once-great society. In 1970, a KGB defector named Yuri Bezmenov warned us how the KGB sows the seeds of discontent, starting in academia. It takes 2 or 3 generations, but once it happens the downfall is fast.

@@johncantwell8216 History is the best teacher. All big empires like Greek or Roman empire - they didn't collapse because of foreign ( outside ) enemy - but from corruption and rot within.... We can all see history repeating itself today....

No one else would defend Boeing

He's showing Boeing perspective.

That’s his job

he's not very good at it.@@twig3288

Without 2D drawing, how can Boeing supervise ? You need the ability to pick critical points and measure against a concrete reference.

Legal double-speak

go tell them that and Airbus too

The problem wasn't the age of the plan, it was the priorities of the original design. Ease of loading and unloading. To achieve this, the wings were too close to the ground by modern standards. The engines were made more efficient by increasing the total air flow. The engine intake area had to be increased, and the engines moved to prevent the intake hitting the ground. The change in engine design resulted in a change in the flight characteristics of the 737 MAX. To prevent the change in flight characteristics requiring 737 rated pilots needing rerating with simulator training, the MCAS was introduced. The MCAS existed for commercial reasons only.

@@nickolliver3021you referring to what plane from airbus?

Switch on the timer on the mobile phone. It too has the advantage that the light of the phone can illuminate the bolt of the windshield wiper, where ice is building up early. Just put it on the dashboard. Yep, technology of the 1960s....

@@jantjarks7946 No temperature switch to prevent overheating.

When De-Icing gets pretty dicey because of Boeing.

Attorney [ from ' Attorn ' -- meaning - to twist or turn ] is the mediator. ( Manipulator ) Attorneys are Snakes - When one observes a snake moving - it also twists and turns

This guy couldn't check for cheese at a barmitzfer...

​@@philipambler3825 *bar mitzvah

Definitely!

Bruh I was thinking he was the one who died

@@Dan_the_Great_ It was somebody else, who testified and was later found dead. It was ruled a suicide, but many believe it was staged.

The software is the most concerning factor : sloppy design, testing, and update, will cause across the board problems.

No one else would defend Boeing. You think the bosses would dare show their faces on TV?

🤣

He's a Church of Obfuscationary Grace member/remember..

Yup and you can still find it here on RU-vid, well worth the search and watch time.

@@gumpyoldbugger6944 I would appreciate the correct search term. With Thanks. ( I find your comments enjoyable : they remind me of those details I had forgotten. )

@@gumpyoldbugger6944 Is it the Al-Jazeera documentary 2012 Al Jazeera Documentary "On a wing and a prayer"

@@michaeledwards2251 could be, been few years since I watched it, but I do remember it was very interesting and very pretty indepth and well done. Had it been done by 60 Minutes instead of Al-Jazeera, it would of probably won some major awards.

@@michaeledwards2251 try al jazeera boeing documentary in the youtube search box, it brings up a number of their documentary's regarding Boeing, from the early problems with the 787 to the 737.

Boeing bought out with their own money : bank interest crushing all over interest.

Right?! Like their only purpose is to defend client, regardless of morals. Why was he even invited here

Your aware the grand niece of Ralph Nader died on the Ethiopian flight ? Its one of the reasons why he is so engaged.

It does when the underlying company culture is the cause.

From what I read about the problem, the door came off, due the subcontractor's software having slightly different usages for the state of a door from Boeing. No one had made the effort needed to make sure both agreed. This resulted in an unfinished door being used during flight. It was luck no one died.

🤣😭sad and funny

and A

​@@nickolliver3021What isn't safe on the A-10 Warthog?

@@morphius2003 or any other plane

@@nickolliver3021airbus far from Boeing 🤣

Goldwingading Goldberg

Nope.....they were in the industry before and left under a very large cloud, remember the L-1011 disaster? They left the industry to focus on the more profitable military industry then the commerical side of things. They would have to invest massive amount of fiscal resources to re-enter the market place, from designing new competative models to retooling and expanding existing production facilities or building new ones. The fiscal drain would be prohibative. Then there is marketing and sales aspect to consider. They would have to go head to head against not only Airbus and Boeing, but also established smaller firms such as Bombardier in Canada, Embraer in Brazil and recently Comac of the PRC. All these firms have marketshare and brand recognitional as well as a history with the worlds airlines, Lockheed Martin would be coming in rather cold. It would be a massive up hill battle for Lockheed Martin to reenter into market and gain market share, plus it would be a massive finacial burden for the company, even if it was subsidised by their weapons and space divisions.

@@gumpyoldbugger6944 The TriStar was a marvelous airliner, much better than the DC-10! The Connie made lots of money. The Electra, once it's wings problem was fixed, was good, etc.. Lockheed could and SHOULD reenter the commercial aircraft market!

@@stuartlee6622 There were only 250 L-1011's built of which 5 crashed,. While the L-1011 was arguably the most avanced airline of its time period technology wise, both it's direct competitor the DC-10 and Boeing 747's were superiour aircraft in terms of performance and passenger capacity. Plus the DC-10, another tri-jet aircraft, was cheaper to built and acquire. As for the Connie and Electra, both were prop powered aircarft although the Lockheed Electra L-188 Model 10 had four turbo-props. Both however were made obsolete when first the UK's de Havilland DH.106 Comet first flew in 1949, followed by the Avro Canada C102 Jetliner a few months later the same year. The final nail into the coffins of the Connie and Electra was when the first Boeing 707 took to the skies five years later in 1954. Interestingly enough, the L-188 Electra first flew in 1957, three years after the introduction of the 707 and in the same year the 707 had entered into commerical service, followed by the DC-8 in 1959. Basically Lockheed was already well behind both Boeing and Douglas from the start and did not offer a proper jetliner until the launch of the L-1011 in 1970. Today's Lockheed Martin faces the same problem as it did back then, they are starting well back from the established firms and have no designs or ability to produce or market one even if they did. Even if they start this minute, it would take them at least 15 to 20 years to get a plane to market, starting with a clean sheet design. About the only way they could get into the market today, is if they were to either licence build an existing Airbus, Embraer or even Comac design or buyout one of those firms, which is highly unlikely given the national pride those firms give their respective countries. Or perhaps they can acquire the commerical airline arm of Boeing. That I could see happening if given both massive Government fiscal and political support.

@stuartlee6622 I 2ND TO THAT : THE STARLINER-SUPER SUPER CONNIES BACK IN THE AIR . Let s start a new carrier , call it NOSTALGIA AIRWAYS . Fly Finnair 🇫🇮

@@sulevisydanmaa9981= I flew on a SuperConstellation between Paris and Brussels fifty years ago. We were provided with puke-bags when passing the entrance door. Endearing memory, symbolic of the progress aviation has made in that last half century. The woes of Boeing come from the immense strides aviation has made in safety during that period, so immense that Boeing excs have taken safety for granted and thought they could get by with a little greed... What Boeing execs have forgotten is that performing close to perfection makes the public more and more intolerant of any remaining imperfection. Cutting any kind of corner becomes a criminal act! Gone are the days when the B26 Marauder could be rushed into production and earn its nickname of “widowmaker" before becoming one of the lesser dangerous bombers to fly in combat missions. But then it was war!