To the video lady, We have a humble heritage, full of potatoes, onions and beets. But once a year, we gather our potatoes, onions and beets, and we prepare for Ukrainian Christmas. We turned to Bosch to chop food more quickly than our babushka-wearing ancestors ever could. It didn't work. We tried everything we could think of to no avail. Finally, we found your video! You, like a Ukrainian angel, explained so clearly what the problem was. Thank you, Video Lady, for saving Ukrainian Christmas.
The food processor has smaller capacity, but the chopping blade is a great tool. This is a dilema that many of our customers face. Mainly because it's redundant to have two units that have the same blade cutting discs (except the french fry blade is only available for the slicer shredder). Hope this helps!
Hi, The blender is definately designed to pulverise whatever you put into it, with care small amounts of ingredients could be successfully chopped up in it. Try making a simple 1 tomato salsa recipe in your blender and see how it works for you. The slicer shredders capacity is definately it's biggest draw against the food processor. A mini whip attachment is also available for the slicer shredder, which is great for smaller amounts of ingredients, and handy when your bowl is already in use.
It's me again. I am wondering wether to get the processor or slicer shredder. I already have a blender right now. Can I do most of the things that require a blade on the processor with my blender? Would you say the slicer shredder is more versatile?
