Breathtaking New Images of the MOON 

Maybe NASA is hiding something from us? 🤔👽

individual grains of moon dust are much sharper and more abrasive. The lack of an atmosphere also makes the day/night temperature swings more extreme. Both of these contribute to wear and failure of rovers

You can though, especially if you're looking at Apollo images intended to make a 360 degree view or smaller panorama when combined

There is no atmosphere to diffuse the suns light and would probably make the picture just a white blur

. . . because all black and white images are false , and it was not yet known how to create a sphere like the sun ☀️🔆🤣 .

Come back man

Well... The moon is Grey colored... sooo

^Wrong^

:P

Some already made this joke.

***** good point how can you get color by filming something thats grey

No one can walk on the moon and no one ever has.

J

They test how many idiots like you are there on the net

They won't because there is nothing there

already been done. Google "LRO Apollo landing sites" You can see the lower descent stages, footprints, and a lot more. Hoaxters don't bother to find factual evidence. It doesn't fit into their belief system.

Have you seen them? A single white pixel, nothing else.

quadcatfly A single white pixel? Oh really? I suggest you try these RU-vid searches: 1) LRO revisits Apollo Landing sites 2)Ultra Close Up Views of the Apollo 11 Landing Site - GoneToPlaid 3) Apollo 11 Powered Descent and LRO Imagery 4) Apollo 15 Descent Film and LRO Imagery The latter two are a split screen of the real-time 16mm DAC imagery AND the manipulated LRO imagery (side-by-side_ Notice the EXACT moonscape of both image sets? There is one major difference between the two. The real-time images show a pristine moonscape. The LRO imagery is littered with footprints and other artifacts ;-) If that doesn't seal the deal for you....NOTHING WILL!

If this video is real it would have been on the nightly news. Obama would be discussing as well. The fact that you have been telling everybody in this thread that this one video should end the moon hoaxers claims once and for all and no one has ever heard of it except you, is really telling. If it were real it would be the most played thing on TV. I think I've seen it. It's CGI, trust me.

Look closely on a normal sized screen with a hand held magnifying glass and you will be... start at about 2:35 onward..

xtelevisionset found it

2019

2020 and NASA is more BS than ever and the world sucks due to a great awakening, now we're all going to lose the few rights we have under the guise of a virus that has killed less people than the regular flu. Can I please go back in time with you guys?

2021

+ArJuna22 No, no one but the graphics producers at NASA can tell you why they thought that would make sense, considering NO OTHER CRATERS suddenly illuminate that way. I just watched a 28 year old Arnold S fist fight a 68 year old Arnold S in the new Terminator movie so anything goes.

If you look around at 2:38 you will see, many more crater's vanish a long with those three crater's, why release this fake bullshit of the moon.

.... Relax.... it's a 3 + minute video.... which means they could not possibly show us everything on the lunar surface, in the time allotted.... Clearly, they tried to transition (or "fade") seamlessly from one photograph to the next.

They are still images, the maker of the video transitioned them

Also at 2:53 there are several towers with tracks leading to them (top left ).

eudherz The sun angle is low, so those "buildings" are just big rocks or boulders casting long shadows.

eudherz ur right and we can see them from earth too😏

Note tower framework with possibly a dish above the crater at 1:32 to 1:34.

Are you still using youtube?

@@Astranaut69 Yes, why ?

@@beb5816 because u joined 10 years ago

There are pictures of landing locations. Do some research!!!!

Because there AIN'T none!

They don't exist... Well they do, or did, but they were on Earth!

@@theBigLubarski_1977 Haha! I'm changing my dog's name to The Big Lebarkski!

1:47 The bright big crater at the center is called Surveyor Crater as in a clock at 4 o'clock is Surveyor 3 at 11 o'clock is Intrepid the Apollo 12 lunar lander, the trails of the astronauts' footsteps can be seen too as thin as fine hairs on top and around the rim of the crater. But if people chose to close their eyes they couldn't see much, still the proof is there for those willing to look for it.

phillip harden Nowadays pictures are more clear.

Exactly. Moon Landings were fake. They can't show any evidence of what was allegedly left on the moon by Apollo, 500 000 pounds of equipment.

Exactly. Moon Landings were fake. They can't show any evidence of what was allegedly left on the moon by Apollo, 500 000 pounds of equipment.

No one can walk on the moon and no one ever has.

@@ScottBott5000 This is why most of humanity keeps living in ignorance. Years of research and planning for the moon landing, the occurrence of a lot of errors and unexpected events almost resulting in the death of the astronauts, the presence of moon dust inside the spacecrafts, heavily damaging them, just for someone like you to disregard it and believe in unfounded theories. Please, inform yourself.

Most craters will be round, regardless of the angle of impact. The release of kinetic energy is on such an enormous scale that it's more like a bomb going off than a simple collision.

Here is a detailed video that explains why most craters on the moon are round: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BCGWGJOUjHY.html

The moon is mainly gray, so it's difficult to see colours even if the photos are colour. You can see that if you look at the moon with a telescope. Also if you look at colour Apollo photos, like this: www.collectspace.com/review/apollo11_flag01.jpg

BS..one more trick from nasa..never-get-straight- answer. It should be in colour.

Art Carvajal LRO does have a colour camera, but it's lower resolution than the B&W camera. www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/earth_and_limb_m1199291564l_color_2stretch_mask_0.jpg If you look at photos from the Japanese lunar probe, you will see that the moon is just gray anyway. www.space.com/images/i/000/003/336/original/080414-kaguya-earthrise-02.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&fit=inside%7C660:*

There are pictures of all the landing sites taken from the LRO. They are available on RU-vid and other sources.

orange70383 Exactly. As a matter of fact this was examined, by several people qualified to do the math, and they determined that the equipment supposedly left on the moon would have​ to much larger than they were to be seen at all from that distance. I would be like watching someone from earth waving at you and​ as you zoom in finding out that person is the size of the Statue of Liberty!

***** No one can leave earth and walk around on another world yet. Especially not 50 years ago.

And you're an expert on space travel? It happened. Tens of thousands of people worked to make it happen. We're not going now only because of politics. We could have bases on the moon, and might have gone to Mars by now if only we had the will to go. The technology is not that hard, it just takes money that Americans no longer want to spend.

John Agnew​​ You're correct. Thousands tried to make space travel a reality but rather than admit failure they decided to fake it. And only a handful of them new the fix was in. The rest were fooled with you and everyone else at home watching. You don't have to be an expert on brain surgery to notice if a patient the doctor is operating on is a mannequin with spaghetti and macaroni as a brain. Or to notice he never washed his hands before surgery. These things alone can help you deduce that an event is fake without it being your field of study. Apollo is the same way. It just looks fake. No other expertise is needed to say that.

*****​​​ I'm a graphic designer and I own a small Trucking company. If you can use personal insults about me without a shred of proof, I sure can talk about what looks fake without proof. I don't need proof to state what looks staged to me. Even if it NASA decided to do the common sense thing like send a robot to the surface of the moon tomorrow and take HD pics of the Apollo Missions sites, that still doesn't change the fact that all the pics and videos prior to them look fake. They will always still appear fake. And they will never prove otherwise in my opinion.

Mee

Dylan N. Yea

There done. It took a year but if you rewatch you'll notice little dots on the Moon's surface. Those are the size of people for your perplexed perspective.

Ahhhh savage😂

Found the idiot.

reply to: Dangit don: You're not talking about the moon rocks that NASA gave to Sweeden are you? Cuz they had those analyzed, and they were found to be petrified wood samples.

All of you saying someone's an idiot because they are woke and aren't sleeping zombies that believe everything you're told are a bunch of bastard children with closed minds. I'm surprised you all don't believe in santa clause. More believable than some nerds saying they destroyed the technology to achieve the greatest thing mankind has ever accomplished, and that they could land on the moon with 60s tech and not even in 2020. You're all foolish as hell it's pathetic.

@doctoristina They have to fake it because a lot of structures,dense atmosphere and clouds......On many Lunar Orbiter Images you can find clouds and structures from buildings and so on.Thats a fact.NASA lied in everything about the moon.Many pictures are faked or manipulated but there is no doubt about that they did go to moon but all that faking has to do with the moon itself (much higher gravity than 1/6 and an atmosphere...) and the habitats and old ruins on it.Even in this new pictures from Tycho crater LRO for example you can find editing and manipulating to get things out of the picture.Maybe they made it often bad that we get a clou whats realy going on since the 60ties.Here some clouds picload.org/view/dcorcoid/clouds.png.html here some rocks ??? picload.org/view/dcorcoip/bandicam2018-11-0419-39-25-362.png.html

?

yes.. the moon carries alot of oil in the grounds. i get some transferred over to my state. But keep this on the low low.

u saw the buzzfeed vid

NAWHHH THE MOON IS RAINBOW A-STUUPID

Karen Barsoum hilarious. You’re funny. Wait...you’re serious? Oh Karen... you may need help...

That was in color.

Happy Hours 1:47 if you look very closely you. Could see the foot Rints

Can you do it for free ? I'd like to use them.

I can make shots of lowers with 3d studio max

If people don't get exactly what they want they moan online.

Anti-intellectualism easily latches onto anti-Americanism and/or religious fundamentalism. It's sad to see people so bored with human achievements they'd rather pretend they didn't happen. It's a sign of a decadent and declining civilization.

@aromardu It could also be the sign of major scientific breakthrough, where in history you can reference 'bored civilisations decline'! that's an interesting one I must say :)

Nomad Chad You do realize that just because someone may disagree with you or have an unpopular opinion doesn't make them a troll?

Nomad Chad Just ignore them. All idiots, every damn one.

That's the Apollo 12 landing site. You can see the lunar module and the Surveyor 3 probe. You can also see the astronaut's footprints where they walked around the rim of the crater to visit the probe and remove some of its parts that were brought back to the earth.

You're not.

Because some of the images that they are showing are assembled from numerous photographs combined with radar data to generate large 3-D maps of the lunar environment. That's why it's called the Lunar RECONNAISSANCE Orbiter. It's meant to generate highly detailed maps of the lunar environment for the planning of future missions.

Open your mind dave!

+FosterZygote Well I need to see high resolution pic on the Apollo site and the equipment left behind. We only get specs that could be anything when it comes to that.

www.nasa.gov/images/content/584398main_M168353795RE_25cm_AP12_area.jpg They are high resolution and they are considerably more than specks. Remember these images were taken from about 31 miles away. That's like photographing a 1 inch object from over 1113 feet away. Luckily there is a valid scientific reason to one day return to the various landing sites from the '60s and '70s, both manned and unmanned. Engineers will be interested to see the effects that decades of exposure have had on the materials left on the moon, especially in the context of planning long term bases. But allow me to make a prediction as to what will result when Apollo conspiracy theorists are one day shown close-up photos of Apollo artifacts in situ. Most of them will simply dismiss these as more fakes, and begin scrutinizing them for what they imagine are telling flaws despite their complete lack of expertise in the relevant subjects.

Dave T if you dont believe go fuck yourself although it looks like cgi this are real photos from the moon and they 3d mapped the moon

Flat earth - Mark Sargent

dan dare...they're everywhere ---> infesting RU-vid like a virus!

Xx_progamer550_xX// DarkGaming550 LOL even NASA shills like you admit it looks like CGI

Dumb, dumber, flatearther

Omni Crenshaw * Thank You * I Agree With You * I Also Have Many Facts That Are At Odds With The Moon Landing Lie * Why Play Golf On The Moon ? ? ? I It Was A Roust To Help Trick The World * To Me , The Golf Thing Shows The Astronauts Were To Carefree To Be That Far From Earth And The Seriousness Of The Mission * Did NASA Take All That $30 Billion Dollars To Show Us Golf On The F***en Moon *

+Kim Swisher I Can't Edit On This Format * I meant To Say At Odds With The Moon Landing *

Kim Swisher Yes. A serious moon landing would have involved some mining expeditions and some stunning pictures of the stars and Constellations. And even if the camera exposure was an issue, they supposedly had several trips there to fix that. And why not bring a telescope. They were simply playing around. And you were also right about them not having enough fear being that far from home not knowing they could get back or not. And everything science -wise, in history that's ever been tried for the first time in history always involved animals doing it first. How is it that the most dangerous, most unknown, most expensive, and most highly televised experiment ever, was not tried on monkeys or lab rats first?

I dare you to take a picture of the stars right now and post it. Give it a try. I am waiting to see your attempts.

John Morrison You do realize stars have been photographed don't you? And the earth has an atmosphere. You have to just set the exposure. I'm sure NASA had filters for that. Smh...

No one can walk on the moon and no one ever has.

john buster. It’s day time. The same reason you can’t see stars here on earth during the day. The sky is black because there is no atmosphere

@@johnturner4400 what the heck are you talking about, itys daytime?? daytime where, in orbit? there is a HUGE difference between pictures taken in a vacuum without the glare from any atmosphere to those taken under under earth's atmosphere. any glare from a bright surface would and could NOT affect the visualness of stars against the blackness of space in the same photo. The black areas off the horizons represent an unaffected line of sight through a vacuum and therefore there is no glare in those areas. You get it? You're totally misunderstanding the physics. I have found pictures of stars in the Surveyor V Program lunar picture archive showing stars that should have also been seen in the Apollo manned flights, but were NOT raising questions about whether or not we ever stepped foot on the moon.

Come back man

I can even clean up the trashes!

@@sussiohlund9139 why does everyone want to go to my daughter?? Focus on getting to mars

No ! it's perhaps any structures' alien ?.. & véhicle for mining machine ; ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dGpNampaxnM.html.. & vidéo - Nasa photo extraordinary ; ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Fy7gEUgsexs.html