Is that for real? That's irritating, why can't "historical" games keep details like this that are obvious to anybody paying attention, instead of only focusing on eye candy.
@@HaydenLau. I wonder how many resources does it take to change a word for a trailer lmfao, and "details they don't make money" then why does most games pay attention to detail when they don't make money off it?
If this can be done, then why not turn it into a movie? About time we had a decent battleship film, retelling one of the great naval operations of WW2. Maybe the hunt for Bismarck for example? If film writers and directors are short on ideas, which they desperately seem to be, then why not create this? I think it would 'go down very well' with audiences worldwide. No pun intended, Sir! 😊
Douglas Daniel Hoods participation was short, but the operation was immense, basically the entire British Fleet intercepted her and sank that bitch once and for all! Impressive story, using little biplanes as well, it didn't just end with the sinking of the Hood!
@@maxdelater3369 yes **looks at Warspite** **looks at range** more shitty than a Avenger against a fucking Maus at least the accuracy is historically accurate but damn the turret needs WD40
When you've never played WoWS and genuinely thought it was going to be a good game about British naval warfare... Then they flick you in your nuts with that ending and make you realise it's nothing like the teaser.
with the 4.5 secondary gun turrets, she can be only either the Queen Elizabeth or the Valiant. As Warspite kept her old 6" guns and had twin 4" added, and the Barham and Malaya did not get the rebuild due to the war starting.
Reality: Broadside provides the best offensive power against your opponents Game: Broadside will get you killed faster than “Dack vs the Empire” (Family guy reference)
With all due respect mate, we did save your arse both times. But in all seriousness the British are extremely underrated. Their sacrifice will not be forgotten
@@nicholascernatescu6685 We can argue this point all year. The 1st World War your impact was at best negligible. The 2nd, your lend lease equipment was viral, however the Russians were the force that defeated the Germans. But thank you for your kind comment.
Dmitri Petrov yeah because it's completely realistic that a country with ~50x less landmass and 6x less population could dominate the country with ~50x more landmass and 6x more population
I am pretty sure Naval Officers at that time were either neatly shaved or wore neatly trimmed beards. But they would never be seen at duty with such 3 days beards. But I guess it was considered cool for whoever directed this.
I don't understand why World of Warships hasn't teamed up with the History Channel or something to make a Battle of Jutland documentary mini-series or something. Use the game engine to recreate the lead-up and battle in glorious detail, get the guys who wrote Castles of Steel and Rules of the Game, get the Royal Navy archive to give you photos and maps. Netflix would snap it up in a heartbeat
For those wondering about the "Fire!" part, here is the Royal Navy's document on firing commands: 6. FIRING COMMANDS a. "Shoot" is used to designate a station to control the time of firing.
You wouldn't even want a Mutsuki to fire torps at you..as from tier 5 onwards they give Japanese destroyers Type 93 torpedoes..one hit would sink a destroyer,3 hits would destroy a battleship.
@@keithwatson1384 I don't know if "disgusting" would be my choice of words, but they definitely don't look correct. Plus it looks like the captain is sporting a goatee. It's a full beard or nothing in the RN.
Don’t you think they should have been wearing some ear protection? I’m mean just the booming of the guns on some battleships can shatter windows and low caliber handguns are already pretty loud. You’d think they’d at least cover their ears.
Особенно смешно современный асбестовый противопожарный костюм на морячках. - Что такое английские морские традиции?! - это ром, плеть и содомия, сэр !!! (с)
