Broken Landing Leg of Odysseus Moon Lander captured in Hi-Res | Intuitive Machines-1 lunar mission

Подписаться 147 тыс.

Просмотров 19 тыс.

50% 1

Intuitive Machines-1 mission showcased groundbreaking high-resolution 4K images of the Moon's surface, providing detailed visuals of broken landing gear and the Odysseus lander's tilting. These images offer crucial insights into the challenges faced during the landing process and the lunar surface conditions. Analyzing such imagery enables scientists to explore the lander's structural integrity and understand environmental factors impacting the damage observed.
The use of 4K cameras on this mission allows for clear observations and detailed analysis, advancing our knowledge of lunar exploration. Additionally, mine footage of the Moon is relevant to elevate our understanding of lunar missions and informs future exploration endeavors. Subscribe now to stay updated on this exciting journey!
Credit: intuitivemachines.com, NASA/JPL-Caltech
Source Lunar Images from Odysseus Lander: intuitivemachines.com/
Moon footage, image processing and voice by iGadgetPro
Like and Subscribe!
Timecodes
0:00 - Intro
0:12 - High-resolution image of broken landing leg of Odysseus
0:42 - Odysseus on the surface of the Moon
1:03 - IM-1 Lunar Lander above the landing site
1:39 - Real Moon footage
2:04 - Credits
#IntuitiveMachines-1 #Odysseus #LandingGear #nasamoon

Наука

Опубликовано:

1 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 87

@jacquesjacques-yh8hh 3 месяца назад

It is a beginner mistake to install 6 thin landing feet instead of 3 robust feet as for Surveyor landers of 58 years ago or as for falcon 9

@titiparisien5915 3 месяца назад

Exactly. Apollo Lunar modules have four robust legs. Such as Falcon 9's first stages.

@randomdude7200 3 месяца назад

I told them not to use that old camping chair to make the legs!!

@Roarmeister2 3 месяца назад

According to the briefing from IM this afternoon, the lander experience more speed vertically and horizontally than designed for. The result was that when the lander touched down it skipped and dragged before coming to a rest. This could easily have resulted in a broken leg or two.

@mariadelia7945 3 месяца назад

Look at the Apollo LM shock absorbers they had on them 50 years ago. I mean this isn't rocket science not known today.

@Murphy007 3 месяца назад

WHY ARE YOU WHISPERING?

@thedbcooperforum 3 месяца назад

Because he thinks it's a mystery why it fell over adding drama with the whisper...shhhhh (laughs)

@jm844 Месяц назад

In cameras aren't hooked on any arms either from the lander because you can't see anything coming out of lander, just animated video

@conniepr 3 месяца назад

Cheaply made legs and attachments. So it broke a leg. Live and learn. Don't cut corners when it comes to the landing gear.

@finophile 3 месяца назад

Thank you for your succinct presentation.

@andrewhillis9544 3 месяца назад

BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD ! ! ! ? ? ?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

@SanjayPChennai 3 месяца назад

Moons gravity is weak and also the surface is very soft...so how come?

@ChristinaVahlsing 3 месяца назад

LANDER WAS TOP HEAVY

@andrewhillis9544 3 месяца назад

OH WELL, LIVE & LEARN & BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME ! ! ! ? ? ?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

@dannmann17 3 месяца назад

It looks like they went back to the drawing board and drew the same thing🤔

@toddmoore5275 3 месяца назад

Just getting there is a huge accomplishment Even if the legs need stiffening I can be grateful that’s not a problem I have here on earth I grin My big dimples at this simple double E. Stiffen up The leg Next time I M I grin

@user-px7eb9kt1o 3 месяца назад

Who took the picture of the broken leg

@willythemailboy2 3 месяца назад

One of the experiments carried was four cameras intended to study the changes in lunar surface immediately before and after landing to learn exactly how the rocket motors used for landing interacted with the surface layers. Presumably those cameras were on arms that swung out to give a wider baseline view of the surface under the lander.

@Jim-nt7xy 3 месяца назад

but other than that, its Mission Accomplished!

@ozzlopez8605 3 месяца назад

It's been so difficult to land these space crafts that really makes me doubt usa landed an actual pod in there...

@johnnyhollis9977 3 месяца назад

Clearly the legs will need beefing up if they want to land in the same area next time. A lower profile would also help too.

@bandit6048 3 месяца назад

Yeah why don't they build it with balsa wood next time!

@christopherjpresti 3 месяца назад

Looks like a bolt was missing.

@MIck-M 3 месяца назад

If it wasn't before it sure is now hehe. ???🔩???

@aloisiorosa3078 3 месяца назад

Desenhar um número 8 no regolito lunar com o jato do motor, seria uma demonstração de pleno controle requintado!

@FocusKnob 3 месяца назад

cost cutting measures didn't pay off

@birdwild6661 3 месяца назад

are the pictures real? or imaginary CG?

@MIck-M 3 месяца назад

It's all imaginary just to fool you, and hide the real twoof that monkeys originally all lived in the clouds until the trees grew high enough for them to climb down. Just lucky we were here to get the twoof out to da sheeple 😀 ☁🐒

@tomsetlock7380 3 месяца назад

looks like 1/2'' EMT..

@bobpourri9647 3 месяца назад

Yep...thinwall.

@AnnBearForFreedom 3 месяца назад

Prolly is exactly that.

@andrewhillis9544 3 месяца назад

YOU CAN'T DO SPACE MISSIONS ON THE CHEAP & EXPECT SUCCESS, THAT HAS BEEN TRIED BEFORE & LOOK WHERE IT HAS GOTTEN US ! ! ! ? ? ?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

@orxanabbasov4965 Месяц назад

Igadget asmr version😅

@aloisiorosa3078 3 месяца назад

O fato de serem 6 trens de pouso ajudou muito! No final da missão, si for possível, poderiam decolar o módulo lunar e tipo brincar de navegação ou então deixar orbitar um pouco a Lua! Ou então pousar em outra região melhor! Porém sou leigo nesse assunto!

@goldfing5898 3 месяца назад

Broken leg, broken voice again.

@andrewhillis9544 3 месяца назад

SORRY BUT THAT LANDER LOOKS LIKE A 'CUT & SHUT' JOB ! ! !🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

@masshultzy6449 3 месяца назад

I told them not to use a carbon fiber & titanium combination.

@danwelsh6706 3 месяца назад

Respect to Analog

@markbrown8584 3 месяца назад

many errors in this vid

@andrewhillis9544 3 месяца назад

ANOTHER FAILURE & ANOTHER DEAD END ! ! !🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

@eduardohernandez0489 3 месяца назад

We all knew it didn’t landed well. That’s why NASA didn’t do live video of landing. It was all obvios

@roland61 3 месяца назад

the cartoon refers to "Intuitive", there is the "nasa" logo🤔

@harriehausenman8623 3 месяца назад

nope. doesnt work. I watch this channel because of the soothing backround music, the cool pictures and renders and some general text explanation in the bottom line. This voice makes me anxious and is not saying anything of value here. There are plenty of channels doing the explanation already 😉

@paisfr 3 месяца назад

Atterrissage brutal 😮

@nedsackmann2215 3 месяца назад

Back to the drawing board. Any type of warranty for the American taxpayers.

@peatmoss4415 3 месяца назад

Private money silly...

@aloisiorosa3078 3 месяца назад

Cara! Você está com a voz mais sensual que a Madonna! Você poderia ser uma daquelas vozes de aeroporto! Vôo para Los Angeles, embarcar no portão 5.

@bulldog161 3 месяца назад

Another failure NASA, but why, are you having to worry about money and profit? No, so you can’t get designers that can’t prepare for off center unlevel landings.

@mosshark 3 месяца назад

It took a hard hit.

@larryvanbarriger6670 3 месяца назад

WoW in the world of video you give me pictures. 🤔 there's no way it can be fake we saw video. Oh no wait we didn't

@AnnBearForFreedom 3 месяца назад

I'm trying to place the accent. Russian, maybe? My ear isn't as good as it used to be.

@farrider3339 3 месяца назад

Hahaha landing gear as thin as a bicycle handle bar. My cat can do better engineering 🙄 🐱meow

@DavidJones-wx4im 3 месяца назад

Fake.

@allthumbstom4019 3 месяца назад

Must have been a hard landing. Too bad. I had to get out, hated that voice.

@darkwood777 3 месяца назад

It was shown in the 1960s that 4 landing gear were better than 6. If you ignore history, this is what happens.

@mycortradeem8937 3 месяца назад

Odysseus 10 days for 3 static images with bad quality. It was super challenge 2024 . Apollos program landers carried crew , boxes , car motorcycle even tractors with real time video audio streaming globally without any delay for hours then return to earth .super easy for nasa 1969. "one giant lie for mankind"

@forthebirds4 3 месяца назад

If you believe that maybe look up the answers to your questions.....google is right in front of you.

@MrAlbertaSurfer 3 месяца назад

Apollo never steamed live, just the moonwalk of Armstrong was live, and some live steams inside the CSM on the way there. The clips you see now are the audio transmissions overlayed on the video of the landings and footage of the surface brought back at the end of the missions. By Apollo 17, the public didn't care enough to tune in to any of it anymore. And the delay between the Earth and Moon is only 1.28 seconds, so conversations were quite natural.

@mycortradeem8937 3 месяца назад

@@MrAlbertaSurfer that is the point . how moonwalk was streaming live in tv . while these days they cannot even get single static image immediately to earth or even 5 mnts after . all what they do only simulation for what is happening there . U want to tell me that capturing 1 image from moon surace in 2024 is more complicated than streaming real time video in 1969 !!! Where is the logic ??

@happyhunter 3 месяца назад

NASA LIKES TO PHOTOSHOP. FOR DECADES

@MIck-M 3 месяца назад

The CAPS lock is the third key up from the bottom left of your keyboard - you can thank me later 😀 ⌨

@perlaursen1885 3 месяца назад

Sad someone spoiled this fine video with annoying muzak, that prevents most of us to read the informative speech. zap zap away

@suthie1953 3 месяца назад

No need for the creepy background music or the weird voice in an other wise interesting video. thank you.

@questtech2698 3 месяца назад

They called it a "successful" landing.

@byssmal 3 месяца назад

It's cheap. No wonder it broke.

@satishmujalde6549 3 месяца назад

What about Chandryaan 3 which recently landed on the south pole of the Moon. Cost : 75M USD Meanwhile US spent : 118M UDS 🇮🇳 proud to be Indian

@byssmal 3 месяца назад

@@satishmujalde6549 No. C3 didn't really land on the south pole. That's why C3 didn't find any traces of water yet. Get your fact straight. Why it cost more for US lander? Because the scientific instrument inside it. NASA directly involved in this private company mission by giving 6 of their scientific instrument. That's why it's expensive because cost of that instruments was counted too.

@googleuser4720 3 месяца назад

Fools, billions of dollars and they didnt try landing it on earth first?

@Roarmeister2 3 месяца назад

I doubt if it was billions of dollars; this IS private enterprise not government work. 2nd, the gravity on earth is 6x of the moon which means the descent motor would never have been able to slow it sufficiently to avoid a total crash on earth.

@MIck-M 3 месяца назад

@@Roarmeister2 I actually did see a similar craft (different engine etc) testing the landing system I thought - I could be wrong.

@georgeburdine5660 3 месяца назад

Use better legos next time.

@user-pc9it3kt2o 3 месяца назад

More tax dollars wasted. I think Odysseus was the God of getting drunk and falling over. Lots of brave words and trying to save face, but in the end this mission was a total failure. Thanks for the boring update.

@ChristinaVahlsing 3 месяца назад

Apollo had a human pilot to land the craft !!! … The space industry should have “first” placed at least 100 communication internet satellites around the Moon before they sent the IM - 1 Lander, so we would have HD video/audio. This mission is very primitive compared to 1969 Apollo 11 video/audio capability. These internet satellites should be placed in a configuration around the Moon, whereas no matter where you land on the Moon (darkside, lightside, northpole, southpole) communication is instant with Earth; reception should have “NO LAG” in strength or intensity. Then the space industry could send SPACECRAFT DRONES and have REMOTE PILOTS on Earth actually land on the MOON safely.

@willythemailboy2 3 месяца назад

No matter what sort of satellite infrastructure you have around you can't avoid the 2.5 second light speed delay. What you're asking for is physically impossible.

@gergelyjaszberenyi391 3 месяца назад

It's not about strength of intensity of the signal, although it is also important for a good signal. It's more about the speed of light which is constant anywhere in vacuum anywhere in known space. Earth-moon distance is 384,400km, and the speed of light is ~300,000 km/s, so a "ping" or back and forth signal would take 384,400 * 2 = 768,800 / 300,000 = 2.5626666666666666666666666666667s. This is around 2500 miliseconds of latency, which you may know is unacceptably high for real time operation :)

@gergelyjaszberenyi391 3 месяца назад

As you may also know, radio signals are electromagnetic signals, and visible light is also an electromagnetic wave. The speed of light applies to all electromagnetic waves. There is currently no technology that reliably provides faster than light communication.

@patrickculleton9939 3 месяца назад

The fancy AI navigational system couldn't process the input quickly enough. It was a half controlled crash landing. Bring back 1969 when engineers were engineers. 📐📏