Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 vs 22 Comparison Shoe Review | Sportitude Running 2023 

Thanks for watching and appreciate the feedback. Happy Running

That's great feedback and makes perfect sense. The Hoka is higher stack (more foam) and softer, therefor for walking can be a little unstable. Running they push through the foam more in the Arahi, so therefor it can work well. In general terms we find the Adrenaline more successful for walking over the Glycerin's. All in line with what we hear and see. Hope you enjoy your next pair of Brooks Adrenaline's.

I had the same experience with the ariha 6. Very soft foam so my foot sunk quite deep. Not very reactive.

Thanks so much! You made my mind up!,

Yeah the green looks terrible

The thought, as a shoe salesman, was that the 22 had a massive wear problem for customers with large calcanea where the stiffness the heel counter provides, with little cushion, results in the buttery smooth heel counter liner coming unglued and tearing. That was where 60% of my customers wore the 21/22 out, and this happened over a short amount of time. I can understand after feedback trying to not compromise on stability, while making the shoe last longer. It is unfortunate that this means the shoe may not function. Might I recommend the Glycerin Stealthfit GTS or Launch GTS as similarly stable shoes, but with a much more minimal heel counter. My Launch 9 GTS/Adrenaline GTS 23 rotation is nice because they contact the calcaneus differently, but cradle my arch the same, with slightly different footbeds and stack height. Plus, Launch 9’s are sitting at $69 right now!

@@dougiehobbs1519 Thanks for your comment and suggestions. I tried the Adrenaline 22 and the padding around the back and ankle was still painful for me. Also, the shoe didn't have enough depth which made my heel sit even higher which did not help. I need shoes with a 12mm heel drop and stability. The only ones I've found that work for me are the New Balance 993 and 990v5. Thanks again for your comment.

@@sl2608I have the same issues you have, but found the 21/22 and now the 23 to be fantastic for those issues. I guess I have opposite feel to you where I feel the shoe supports very well in the collar without any undue pressure causing irritation. I will agree that the 22 did wear fast in the heal/collar area which has me moving around quite a bit in a very short time period.

Id be confident the 23's will be just as good for ! @wristcheck350 - Thanks for watching and sending through your comments.

Good for you. I hate the 22.

@@standardnnn6064 I actually liked the 22's however like others have said, I developed holes in them and they weren't abused. Hope the 23'a fare better.

Yes… sort of. Subtle variance in the midsole density “slight”

So glad to see this. I loved the 21 and did not like the 22. I too wish there was a 23 v 21 comparison.

Same here, is it just me or was the padding in the 22 lacking compared to 21?

@@marcmartin3642 my shin splints were at an all time high with the 22s. I ended up switching to Hoka and won’t be looking back

@@marcmartin3642 yes

I was one of the people who didnt like how narrow the 22s were compared to 21s.

The GTS system would be excellent at providing support, but if you have very flat feet, can provide a feeling of a “high” spot. I’d go Adrenaline’s every day.

thats what i am worried about. Brooks have been getting narrower and narrower

Hi @skateata1, thanks for watching and the feedback. I can assure you the width of the 23's does offer more volume through the toe box. Not a lot of difference though. There will always be minor changes overtime, but compared to other brands they are easily the most reliable. I think this is the great thing with this shoe, its available in 4 widths. This will depend on what region of the world you are from... As I am lead to believe that not all markets get all widths. All the best and I hope you enjoy the 23's as much as you did the 21's. Regards, Josh

I am glad someone agrees with me. Version 22 is no different from shoes I bought for $20. Absolutely garbage as far as running shoes are concerned. If you wear for walking, gardening or going to the mall, yes maybe. Not for running. Low quality foam

It depends on what you use them for the Adrenalines aren't running shoes they are made for walking

I just bought my first pair of workout shoes ever, so I am very new to this. When I went to the running g shop yesterday they recommended me to get the Adrenaline 23 over the Hoka Clifton 9 and NB 1080 for Overpronation. Do you have an opinion on this? I bought the 23s yesterday but I have 30 days to try them. They do hurt my right heel with rubbing as though it'll leave a blister...but only on the right and I went up a size from my normal when purchasing...

Are you serious about them being garbage? I find them great walking and some light training. I'm not much of a runner, so I can't speak on that topic. What shoe would you suggest for running? I prefer New Balance.