Interesting stuff. Thanks. I have a remark though. Until AI/ML gets us non-trivial and verifiable results, the (overly simplifying) step of modeling the (extraordinarily complex) human brain by a bunch of algorithms, neural network layers and loads of data will inevitably be fraught with all kinds of biases (confirmation, social, racial...). Hence, the way I see the conclusions presented here is: it *is* nature that is validating the models, not the other way round :))
