Glucks better his music serve the libretto and there is more light and emotion and pure, lully's music is too medieval too baroque a lot of thrilles and ther is no action. Classicals and Romantics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>baroque
@@Ali-sy1gk classical and romantic composers music is generally devilish screams and monotonous whimpers. Gluck's music is boring dried shit that embodies decline of European musical taste. While baroque music and especially Lully's music is is the highest level of enjoyable music if you have the ear for it. His music is refined and balanced. The polyphony of the voices is beautiful. Lully is perfect in his use basso continuo instrumental accompaniment. Thrills are awesome. His musical tragedies are pleasant. The very idea of the genre is not action but the deep emotions that it evokes. Lully's art represents glory and the will to live. I would say Lully is the pinnacle of western musical evolution.
@@naumprihodyaschy8629 Lully a du génie, oui, mais il n'a pas le 10e du génie théâtral de Gluck, qui est un véritable tragédien. Lully est «versaillais», c'est tout dire : la décoration, les artifices, mais jamais l'âme ! Quand vous dites que «Gluck's music is boring dried shit that embodies decline of European musical taste» vous êtes dans les patates : Gluck annonce au contraire Beethoven (qui l'admirait), Weber et l'opéra romantique. Gluck a cloué le cercueil de l'opéra baroque, avec ses conventions, ses redites, ses insignifiances, etc. Il emploie déjà un orchestre puissant (voir le Traité d'instrumentation de Berlioz qui en fait l'éloge) et bannit le clavecin en composant un récitatif expressif et proprement dramatique.
