California Screamin' (2001) vs Incredicoaster (2024, Non Copyright) POV comparison

Подписаться 156

Просмотров 61 тыс.

50% 1

Here is 2 POVs of the same coaster, one is from when it first opened, and the other is from this year. This coaster got a huge overhaul in 2018 and was altered by a great amount. It was also altered over the years even before it was changed to Incredicoaster. I also synced it as best as I could at the launch but I didn't sync it before the launch.
2024 POV Filmed on GoPro Hero 10
2001 POV: • California Screamin' P...

Опубликовано:

3 апр 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 75

@shaun4591 Месяц назад

The scream tunnels were extended to create more "darkness" for the showscene figures. Gives the illusion of going faster but it's the same ride system.

@510cristian4 Месяц назад

i honestly miss california screaming just because it was the first rollercoasters i’ve ever been on, i remember my dad making me go on it i went in crying and came out with a smile on my face and my love for roller coasters/rides started there

@Gaming_kid_or_other_stuff Месяц назад

That's the same thing that happened to me!

@1saamor897 Месяц назад

bruh stop missing coasters 💀

@510cristian4 Месяц назад

@@1saamor897 outta here

@mynameiskrysta 3 месяца назад

I dont trust comparing the speed of two coaster videos, completely imperceptible skipped frames can drastically change the speed of a video and there’s a lot of room for that in a video that’s been uploaded to youtube, downloaded, edited, and reuploaded to youtube Edit: not to mention the differences between how standardized cameras are now vs in 2001

@SlushysSecret 2 месяца назад

But Screamin in 2001 did go faster because the break runs weren’t as strong as they are now

@WoWUndad 2 месяца назад

wtf is wrong with you schizo its literally the exact same roller coaster and youre trying to dispute microseconds

@FK_TRUMP 2 месяца назад

True

@olympicbuilder-JHKimaginnering 2 месяца назад

Also depending on how Many train is running and how crowded the park it at the moment.

@mynameiskrysta 2 месяца назад

@@olympicbuilder-JHKimaginnering neither of those would change the speed of the coaster.

@Calfornia_Coasters 2 месяца назад

The kick of the older LIMs felt a lot quicker than it is now

@ejectorseatcoasters 2 месяца назад

Yeah it sure did! I remember riding back in 2016 and it did feel more powerful. And at my home park, SFGAm, V2 still uses the old LIMs and I also feel that the start of the launch is much more powerful. Plus, at the start it probably doesn't even hit the speed that Incredicoaster goes.

@Legos-u1v 3 месяца назад

Is it just me or does incredicoaster now break down more than when it was california screamin cause the times i went to disneyland when it was california screamin it only broken down once in the entire trip, but when I went with the refurbishment and i just gone on it this week it broke down at least 5 times every day and it was for almost 3 hours down. Loved it more when it was california screamin less of a wait to ride. Oh and nice video btw.

@ejectorseatcoasters 3 месяца назад

Yeah, I don't seem to recall California Screamin' breaking down at all the day I was there when I was 8. As I was about to get my 10th ride on Incredicoaster, it shut down for the rest of the night and people were stuck on the launch. And I agree, Incredicoaster had over an hour wait the day I was there so I had to spam the single rider line lol!

@edrrrk 3 месяца назад

that is probably because there is more people wanting to ride it per day now. Like you said, "less of a wait to ride", theres more people visiting disney parks nowadays than in the 1990s and 2000s and maybe this ride can't handle the amount of people coming 🤷‍♂🤷‍♂ idk

@adventuresinsplashmountain6 2 месяца назад

No its not just you. The Incredicoaster is just stupid

@1ronEntertainment 2 месяца назад

I’m actually glad you mentioned it. Every comment here has an incorrect theory. Disney maintenance has just been slacking recently. Nothing to do with rides or more ppl wanting to ride, since the capacity it operated at is the same. Lots of rides have been broken recently. That’s why I stopped going to DL

@genappithy 2 месяца назад

It was a younger ride when it was screamin’. It’s getting older and more unreliable

@ryanc.3372 2 месяца назад

The ride ran faster 2001-2006. After a train in 2006 slipped the break zone before the final helix and bumped a train in the final break run, magnetic trims were added to the ride at : 1:15 and 1:41. The loop used to be much more intense and the bunny hills use to give strong air-time.

@donuts-df8on 2 месяца назад

i did notice that in the video that Increadicoaster got trim-breaked more during the last part

@bleepiestofbloops Месяц назад

That's interesting! My first ride would have been when it was faster, and it had me sidelined for at least 30 minutes after the ride. I never had an issue when I rode it more often after '06 and thought it was more chill than I remembered. Maybe this did it.

@heavenandhello6629 2 месяца назад

California screamin and paradise pier were so much better, and plus, the only awful excuse as to why disney decided to change it to the incredicoaster was all just because of the release of Incredibles 2. That movie isn’t popular anymore. Bob Iger, please bring back california screamin and paradise pier!

@kpov2533 2 месяца назад

OG California Adventure was up their as biggest flop as OG Disney Paris. It's well known and documented. It was a fair. Disney had to step it up and they did just that. Cars land, marvel campus, Pixar Pier it's way improved and now well visted and enjoyed

@VestedUTuber 2 месяца назад

@@kpov2533 Except the general sentiment is that while Cars Land was great, Pixar Pier feels tacked on and Avengers Campus is one of the most hated areas of ANY Disney park.

@heavenandhello6629 2 месяца назад

@kpov2533 I disagree, and plus, california screamin was better than incredicoaster because it had a least annoying spiel and had a soundtrack that fits for going at a speed of 55 mph.

@stanfordite1 Месяц назад

@@kpov2533 That's a lie. Marvel and Pixar Pier do NOT belong and are among the biggest failures in park history. Thankfully both will be removed from the parks to avoid the royalties Disney will owe after the government trust busts the company and takes those IPs away. No one will miss Marvel or Pixar.

@richardespinoza2839 17 дней назад

@@kpov25332017 was a period of growth for Disney and they wanted to do more tie ins which screwed over the post 2010 Paradise Pier

@1saamor897 Месяц назад

i actually thought it was slower before on Screamin. and personally i think the theme and music makes the ride more “alive”.

@S.K.R.E.Inc. 2 месяца назад

They should have made Pixar its own land and not retheme one, would have fit perfectly in between Hollywood Pictures backlot and Cars Land. Brings back memories and my inner critique seeing the comparison

@Sticky_sausage69 2 месяца назад

Yeah and they could try to put Monsters Inc. in it only thing would be they might have to get rid of Mission Breakout

@Tortoise1Plaz 2 месяца назад

The launches can differ how long the train waits there we can’t trust that

@BigBlockEpicSong 2 месяца назад

Yeah it happened and he said 1 and nothing happened. I thought Evac and then we launched

@63fahrenheit 3 месяца назад

Looks like it went faster before, but the breaking sections slowed it down more temporarily?

@ejectorseatcoasters 3 месяца назад

It looked like it was slower in 2001 up until the bunny hills, mainly because of the 2005 incident where 2 trains collided on the final brake run and they had to really slow down the ride from there

@VestedUTuber 2 месяца назад

This ride really doesn't benefit from the retheme. It removes some of the suspense from the launch by having a countdown and while the original felt like it was designed to resemble a classic wooden coaster, the new Incredibles theming just feels tacked on.

@02_valkyrie 2 месяца назад

Idk if it was faster but it was definitely more jarring back then. I went in 2003 and the starting propulsion actually gave me a minor injury in my neck. (I was 12 at the time)

@ejectorseatcoasters 2 месяца назад

Getting even just a minor injury on a coaster sounds pretty rough, but from what I experienced when I went on this ride in 2016 (I was almost 8 at the time) I did feel a bit more of a kick on the launch. I'm not sure if it was more jarring back in 2003 because I did not exist during this time, however I do have some family members that rode this during its early years.

@adventuresinsplashmountain6 2 месяца назад

Back in the early years of this coaster it was pretty jarring from what I heard. But in 2005, there was a serious accident where 2 trains collided at the very end of the ride sending 15 riders to the emergency room. And that was a pretty big deal, so they did have to slow it down just a little bit

@dindog22 3 месяца назад

looks like they added some trim brakes in the final third of the ride

@heavenandhello6629 2 месяца назад

That was added wayyyy before the ride became incredicoaster though.

@richardespinoza2839 17 дней назад

they were added in I believe 2005 after a train was rear ended, Disney did add a new safety mechanism after that but they opted to use the trim brakes instead

@ilikerollercoasters4757 2 месяца назад

It honestly seems to be running exactly the same as it did when it was new.

@heavenandhello6629 2 месяца назад

Actually no, because when the coaster was california screamin, the motors that the ride was using were LIM (Linear Induction Motors) and when they changed it to the incredicoaster, they changed the motors to LSM (Linear Synchronous Motor)