Can Liquid Hydrogen Save The Combustion Engine? 

Sure, but it is a non issue if you have good materials, also, leakage over like a month is minimal

@@nikanora97 you'd need insulation (like seen on orange rockets), and that, on top of all the tech associated with storing a liquid at -253 C result in high cost and maintenance requirements. Also, the slow leaking is a problem not because of wastage, but because hydrogen REALLY likes to explode, so massive safety hazard.

@@KAILASCHANDRANM.S I mean I do think that pressurised hydrogen is the way to go to be fair. Cars that have that have really good range. The liquid nitrogen is challenging in logistics and other things aswell

Nasa sometimes uses hydrogen as fuel and they always reschedule the launch because of hydrogen leaks. 😢 Also hydrogen is lighest element. ​@@nikanora97

@@KAILASCHANDRANM.S It leaks slowly, and as a gas it disperses very quickly.

Sarcastic joke

Morty where we are going we don't need -253°c morty , once this baby hits 88 mph , you're going to see low effecency bar on the spedometer

😅😅😅 a time bomb

​@@random_cocaine4667efficiency, speedometer.

You don’t need to store hydrogen cold. You can just pressurize it to 10,000psi in a very heavy tank……wait..never mind🤔

Freezer

​@@ShoaibKhan-gr3kx delete urs his is better

good. it can keep my groceries chilled on the way home.

@@dallaswinston8260 Nah

@@BSegars1 yah it is DELETE UR COMMENT

Microplastics are stored in the balls

Pea is stored in the balls

Lemon juice is stored in the balls

Bro thought this is a steam engine

@@albinocake nuclear is also just a steam engine

​@@albinocake Lil bro thought he was gonna do smn

@@albinocake blud has 500 iq x 0

@@albinocake got evaporated on this one bro XD

Maybe in a parking garage.

Naw. It's safer than a Tesla.

We already travel around with a tank of highly combustible liquid in a tank. Granted gasoline isnt under high pressure but every danger can be mitigated if the will to is there.

@@handyman2233 At least you can see a gasoline fire. A hydrogen fire, the best way to find it is to wave a stick of wood around. If it suddenly bursts into flames, there's a hydrogen flame in front of you.

@@BooBaddyBig My point is theres a drawback to everything and we figure them out.

Gas explodes and burns too but yea

@@alaska_adventures49it’s not under pressure, ready to vaporize at any moment.

@@bassman_0074 oh yeah, good point

its not pressurized so it will just leak out

@yugo_tv8433 liquid gas is inherently pressurized when put in a container above the evaporation temp of the liquid. When hydrogen leaks out, it will do so with immense pressure, and if it contacts a flame or spark, it will explode.

Engineering explained issues great videos to tackle must subjects. Great nerd videos

"No carbon emissions" 60-80% of powerplants:

We actually already have the technology to produce hydrogen instead of natural gas in wells, completely without CO2 emissions. Hydrogen is the future, not these hyper-polluting electric cars.

You mean nuclear power plant?

@@yesveryyoutube6354 Any hydrogen fuel will have to be produced from water likely through electrolysis, which would take far more energy than burning the fuel could produce. Such inefficiency could never be supported by sustainable energy.

If I don't see the fossil fuel getting burned, it does not get burned. Hydrogen, and for that matter EV, advocates have the object permanence of toddlers.

Liquid hydrogen tanks in cars are basically creating Hindenburgs on wheels

CNG is the same thing, and has been used for years lol.

Believe it or not, It's a lot safer than having a gas tank in your car. These fuels, gas or hydrogen need BOTH fuel and oxygen to burn. As nature of hydrogen being very light and volatile, the time window of having right fuel to air mixture is very tight compared to gasoline.

​@@DrArkham.And CNGs don't explode? Lol

​@@user-uh6kq2wh9gyou're comparing a tank that does NOT store gasoline in a pressurized environment vs HIGHLY pressurized liquid hydrogen bring stored at close to absolute zero. You need a spark or someone manually igniting the gasoline for it to catch fire, with hydrogen it's a double whammy. I don't want a hindenberg roaming around in my neighborhood no thank you.

Actually not so bad at all

Lookup what emissions come out of normal cars.

A bit of humidity vs Nitrogen Oxide gases. One causes wrinkly skin and the other cancer.

Влажность воздуха после дождя 100 раз больше будет и ничего - все живы!!!😊❤😊

Better than what comes out of a normal car's

A method by which nuclear electricity could be produced is a space the size of a consumer vehicle, in quantities significant enough to operate said vehicle, is currently speculative at best.

HAHAHAHAHA

This would still be better for the environment than these "electric" cars.

You wouldn’t get any explosive fission from a nuclear powered car. Just nice warm stream of highly cancerous gamma rays. That’s if the Uranium rods got the ability to breath fresh air.

ah yes the forbidden sun rofl

Just give it a watch, and then take a 6 hour nap - cat approved!

@@EngineeringExplained jokes aside I'll probably watch later, love your channel and would subscribe but I'm at the sub limit for RU-vid 💀💀 have a good day man

​@@Wiisporter I didn't know there was a sub limit. How much?

@@Life_42 it's about 1k? I had like 50 subbed to me but then my channel got deleted so I got rammed to the limit. To go higher you need like 30 subs

​@@Wiisporter I encountered the same limit, but after a while, it got removed/Expanded Now i am omw to sub to the absolute limit 😅

Its actually just as much as Diesel

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe.

@@kibbles5724and also difficult to separate, transport and store. Hydrogen for home heating needs 7x more input electrical energy than a heat pump, for example.

​@@JP-zd8hmbro do your research. I made hydrogen In my backyard using some scraps and a Tupperware

@@kibbles5724 In the universe, yes, but the most abundant element on Earth is oxygen at 46%. Hydrogen is only 10th at 0.14%.

OH THE HUMANITY!

(I know this is about toyota but)... Hondaburg

Hindencar

hoi4 reference?!!?!?!11111111

*A leaf drops* *Explodes*

The energy needed to power all of the proposed electric trucks, cars, homes and businesses IS insane. It's all hopes and dreams and not rooted in any reality.

No energy needed to keep liquid hydrogen that cold, once liquid that temperature is its natural temperature. The issue is keeping it in the fuel cell. Either it evaporates if there is the slightest hole in the fuel cell or makes the tank so brittle it shatters easily. OTR Hazmat Trucker, I have carried this stuff in a doubled walled tanker for a decade. Dangerous as the DEVIL, a ruptured tank and no one lives in the vehicle.

@@ge0arc244 "No energy needed to keep liquid hydrogen that cold"... so you're saying it's magic ?.. it somehow defies all laws of the universe, and apparently is the answer to the entire climate warming thing... good news everyone, the climate crises is soon to end, and we'll all have free a/c to boot.... hmm..it may be expensive to install initially, but i wonder why all the packing houses and cold storage facilities haven't availed themselves of this tech instead of spending 10s of thousands per month for refrigeration ?

@@EricCarl-x1m EV's use less energy than gas or diesel cars, so no its not insane. You just dont want change because your scared of it.

​@@ge0arc244 Please learn thermodynamics.

still better than an ev! doesn’t require child labor and uses a renewable fuel source instead of a limited one (lithium is very limited, hydrogen however can be easily produced)

@@crystalthewolf8945 im pretty sure a crash of this car would literally be an explosion... also lithium can be recycled 95% so it will take a very very long time to run out of lithium (by then we'll probably be able to harvest asteroids or smth)

Would probably still be more reliable than an American car

not exactlt it wouldnt cause the fuel tank to rupture but in case of a rapture it causes a massive explosion even if there not much to ignite it cause hydrogen gas doesnt like to exist especially at high pressures and around anything with oxygen

@@crystalthewolf8945 Easily produced, maybe. Easily stored is a different beast. In this video you can see how the storage fills the trunk AND the two back seats of the car. In a cilinder at -253ºC, that allows evaporation of the content.

I don't think you know someone who has one.

@@logitech4873 I think he might, there is someone in New Zealand who has created a fully hydrogen bus and it works really well but the problem is the fact that there is no hydrogen charging stations etc so they cant really use it without going back to the bus lot where it was created to refuel which makes it not worth it to keep making

we had a big snow storm end of december that got to -10 and it killed everyones electric cars, it was 5k for each car for the battery.

@@FedkaSlovanichit’s so weird I left lithium batteries (little power tool ones) in the car when it was -35F (-37C) and it definitely didn’t destroy them. They said the state of charge was partial even though I had charged them the day before, but once they warmed up and go recharged they were OK.

@@FedkaSlovanich weird, my Tesla was able to hand -30 degree Montanan winters just fine

@@coreytaylor5386 what model

@@FedkaSlovanichare you referring to the storms in Ohio or wherever that people couldn’t charge their batteries at charging stations and it turned out the batteries had to precondition (heat up) that it was so cold it too like 45 min, people left before that bc they had no idea about preconditioning and just assumed their car was bricked, when it wasn’t. Ended up being a smear piece by the media. None of the cars were damaged. Of course they never share that on all the news sites, just the bs click-bait articles.

That’s a good point. Only thing that really came to my mind though is why even do this to began with. Hydrogen fuel cells are already over the 50-60% efficiency mark in practice. But the standard engine design only gets 52% in theory and like 20-30% in practice so what’s even the point?

@@treymiller5736 Powerplants have near limit efficiency, which is due to its low surface area/volume rate (size matters :)). So, if you directly burn hydrogen in powerplants, it will still have a higher efficiency than the hydrogen fuel cell. My guess for that hydrogen fuel cell is that it cannot have enough conversion speed to satisfy driving energy consumption. You can increase the efficiency by using cataclysms in these fuel cells. But it usually limits the size and conversion speed of the fuel cell since you need large surface areas for thorough contact and some reaction time.

​@@treymiller5736 in fact the very same Toyota company that's researching the use of hydrogen in combustion engines is also investing on fuel cell cars like the Mirai. One problem of fuel cells is they need expensive materials.

Nice

Come on. Everyone in heat transfer knows that a greater temperature differential knows it's a more efficient carnot engine

piloted by people with minimal skill, 90% of the time texting on their phone or straight sleeping at the wheel. Yea....Recipe for disaster.

compared to a 50L+ tank full of flammable liquid with equal the amount of chance of exploding?

​@@MrToySoljaPetrol explosion and Hydrogen explosions are way different, Hydrogen would probably leave a crater in the road when that blows up

Do you know what gasoline does? We’re already driving around in bombs that have explosions happening 1000x a minute

@@kakkacarmenelectra7229 do you also know that gasoline is much harder to light off than hydrogen? Liquid gasoline doesnt really light off very well until its vaporized..Hydrogen is like liquid oxygen..

they actually already sell one in california and it’s pretty popular

@@crystalthewolf8945more like pretty unpopular

​@@crystalthewolf8945I bet the hydrogen is nor store as liquid; therefore, the mileage range is short.

@@sam512that’s what they said about the Prius but now it’s one of the most hated/ popular modular cars in the world

@@georgeburns6512 that may be true, but since the mirai is used so little in California they are shutting down hydrogen fuelling stations

That fuel ain't cheap, it takes electricity to make it and you get more miles using that electricity in an EV

​@@DanPetrePhotos and its super cooled hydrogen At least gasoline cant make you into a posickle

Nah we are no where near having it commercially available and reliable to not become either a slow gas leak or a portable 500kg bomb.

Yeah, many trains have been using it for years. I believe there's a German company that exclusively builds hydrogen trains

@@nikolaideianov5092 your right it just makes you a human torch XD

Could say the same about a gas powered car exploding because a crucial part broke or en ev exploding because the battery went nuclear on itself

​@teenageapple3788 Keeping something at an extremely cold temperature is not the same as an electric car sitting without draining the battery or an internal combustion car sotting and doing nothing in room temperature. Two of those sit there and do mothing passively, while one has to actively keep cooling.

​​@@teenageapple3788oh shut up LMAOOO "crucial part broke". Pulled something straight out of his bottom.

​​@@teenageapple3788 a gasoline car sitting idle catching fire won't level an entire building the way a hindenberg on wheels will. Not to mention, hydrogen can just suddenly think "nah these walls are too limiting" and escape anyway even without a leak LMFAO

​@@teenageapple3788there is absolutely no way an EV will go "nuclear". That is something hindenberg-on-wheels will do - level an entire block in a multi hindenberg-on-wheels crash. An EV will keep burning and will waste thousands more gallons of water to put out vs gasoline but it will still not go "nuclear" LMFAO.

That brings up another problem with electric vehicles when they catch on fire they do not want to be put out and fun fact they get harder than the surface of the Sun it takes a couple 100000 gallons of water to put out one vehicle

@@austinteal3645 not sure how hard the surface of the sun is, but they call it sunblock for a reason

If you witnessed leaking fuel from petrol and diesel cars running down a high way cooking Woman and kids alive in trapped cars, when if they were in Tesla’s could have walked away like that man who drove his family of a mountain road tumbled over 250 ft landed on its wheels and all survived, Toyota are in a free fall panic like all legacy ice car makers, there sales a falling there profits are gone they are all in hundreds of billions of dept, can’t make profits on there EVs nothing left but to call Elon bad and lie about Tesla,

@@austinteal3645at least when ev burn, u can run away from it. But once that hydrogen tank explode one blink u will be in next life instead of next destination

​@@austinteal3645and electric cars won't catch up Fire more often as ICE cars or blast suddenly like hydrogen cars.

It’s fine, having a home storage system and recondenser is cheaper than a wall charger.

No, it wont.. Temp is maintained under pressure.

@@bobspinelli2994 it absolutely will. i suggest actually looking into the car. the tank isnt capable of keeping it at such a temperature, for extended preiods of time, where hydrogen dosnt evaporate, so than the hydrogen starts becoming gas. in fact there is a safety valve that will release hydrogen as the temperature rises, so the tank stays under safe pressures. And it is quite significant the amount of hydrogen that is released.

You mean like they do in California? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤣

It already does

It’s not water it’s concentrated hydrogen. the difference being water is a liquid at 32-212 degrees Fahrenheit (or 0-100 degrees Celsius) and is a very stable substance, pure hydrogen however is a gas way before any naturally occurring temperature on earth and is highly EXPLOSIVE. So it would be a hydrogen tax and not a water tax. There are other issues besides the combustible nature of hydrogen but that would be the most major concern in my opinion.

@@cjmarion6350 Well, he might just be correct in it becoming a water tax that forces us to use Hydrogen Liquid for fuel though. I mean most of California is powered by Hydro Electric Power from water stored in their reservoirs, which they really don't have enough of even without the extra drain on the grid charging Electric Vehicles. So when the water level gets back down to 50% or so and it's calculated there's not enough water to drink, cook and shower if they continue to farm, then they most likely will tax water to numbers never seen before in the history of the civilized world. Then we'll have to trade in our EV's or store them in our garages until the water level comes back up or they lower the tax on water. When you own a Hydrogen Powered vehicle, your garage become useless because you're not allowed to park one in your home garage so storing an EV in there is likely. Best thing would be is save your gasoline powered vehicle in the garage and when there is no water for electricity you can cook old corn and potatoes to make fuel for your old V8 and run errands for all your neighbor's, if they can supply you with what it takes to make fuel, because Commiefornia is likely going to ban gas stations to ensure everyone buys Electric Vehicles.

you lack of intelligence, while still having a pulse, is amazing.

Why would you need LOX? It’s not going into space man.

While getting paid 20$ per hour

Matter of regulation. New mechanics graduate every year. They will eventually replace the old guard that can’t do this.

@@UpperDarbyDetailingYou wouldn’t need lox but if the lh2 leaks it’s cold enough to condense the air. I don’t think that’s a problem in a fire though.

Hydrogen is like : I dont like this wall .Why not just go trough it ?

You say it like it is an inconvenience.

its not pressurized so it wil just leak out

@@punto885and if a leak reaches a spark, tell me how explosive is hydrogen?

​@@punto885 it is incredibly pressurized actually, to even reach that temp. if it reaches normal atmospheric temperature and pressure upon a rupture of the tank, it'll turn into a gas extraordinarily rapidly and would go off like a mini-nuke. Ever held a bottle of lighter fuel? Try punching a hole with a knife into it and see what happens.

@@sylvan744. Just like gasoline.

Than

Certified Ford Pinto moment.

Napolian dynamite

I think the hindenburg used hydrogen just because it was the lightest element, like all the other airships

a tan full of hydrogen exploding is a neighborhood demolition bomb..

Exactly. Every one of big6 automakers have had a working hydrogen-ICE vehicle for over a decade. Nobody wants release one. Toyota is farther behind Ford Motor, GM & BMW esp in technology of EVs & current GTDI engines. I'm in auto Industry ..29yrs now.

If the vehicle is hit catastrophically, I don't think it matters if the driver is frozen or carbonized 💀💀

@@viarnayThats not even true. The hydrogen cannot explode while still in the tank because there is no oxygen. But when it leaks out and ignites, it just burns off because you don’t get an explosive mixture from just leaking hydrogen into the air. It is also lighter than air so it tends to move up as soon as it exits the tank. Your comment is either so incorrect because of malice, or because you do not have any idea about the topic but decide to say something anyway.

@@nanolog522 this right here, it amuses me how much garbage people talk around hydrogen. The main reason hydrogen engines never took off is because hydrogen is incredibly inefficient to produce, not because we can't make a good enough tank to store it.

You can just use bioethanol + ethanol reforming, we already have the infrastructure for ethanol, can produce it carbon neutral, and all it requires is a reformer on the vehicle.

@@vuza752 I think any application for hydrogen should be for freight trains. they are huge and heavy, so much more protective of a hydrogen tank than a vehicle. they are super efficient already due to rails, and they can go crazy far distances, so they could handle having relatively few fueling stations. The railroad could go carbon neutral in a much shorter time.

We *are* solving the problem though, plus, there are other ways to store hydrogen being explored that should help fix the density problem. I for one remain very hopeful and optimistic for hydrogen.

We'll get it. Electrolysis of water is the easy way. You just split water on demand. Water isn't hard to store. And Toyota DID NOT invent or develop this

It works. But it’s not used like petrol or other carbon-hydrogens, it’s an enviroment friendly alternative of batteries, which pollutes the enviroment at it’s manufacturing.

Less people will be the ONLY way as it is impossible to make people live without using power..

​@vihreelinja4743 I disagree. We need to find more efficient use of our power grid. when lights started changing from incandescent to LEDs the energy consumption dropped, with more efficient cooling systems we can have a cheaper energy bill for keeping our food and homes cool

​@@vihreelinja4743or then build more nuclear power.

Bruh, liquid hydrogen is very dangerous I mean people say battrjes and gasoline are dangerous too, but remember, they are not EXPLOSIVE , simply hydrogen is WAY MORE DANGEROUS than any other fuel

Ask Germany how their "green grid" is working out for them. Their consumers pay the HIGHEST energy bills in all of the EU.

That's not a hydrogen combustion car.

Feasible maybe but it’s just not a good/practical idea

​@@gefulltetaubenbrust2788it's really good for bigger vehicles, its arguably better to have for a lorry/semi

@@Soarano I think bigger vehicles can stay with diesel. modern diesel engines are not that bad. Euro7 engines are already efficient and lower emissions plus if use as a generator to power an electric drive train it gets more efficient.

​@@SoaranoWhatever the question was, (green) methanol is a better answer than hydrogen.

This wouldn't be using an electric motor...

this caught me off guard omg

This made me laugh out loud!

The situation will be better than in fuel cells in any case

What about the 75% more fuel in your fuel, that's right 75% more fuel in fuel, aight Cave 'Toyota' Johnson out.

He's the only one who would have pushed this to production 😭 ​@@ragibmahfuz5241

That's such a burn 🔥

Stop and realize how ignorant you sound, do you realize that the research being done on Hydrogen used as a combustion element has HUGE spin off potential, those patents could be worth BILLIONS to the energy supply market.

Yes the BMW hydrogen 7 was an experiment using the E65/6 platform. A small number were made for the German market and given to select customers to test and evaluate. They used existing petrol engines and worked pretty well. There is a video on the BMW YT channel showing how the fuel filling system works. I remember there were technical docs available for them on the BMW service system. I can't give a link as it requires a staff username etc.

yeah, because toyota is famously unsuccessful, devoid of innovation, isn't profitable, and builds notoriously unreliable vehicles..

Well long running car company’s stay long running by trying many things even if failure is almost guaranteed.

Are most of these “bomb” comments just straight up bots ?

that's some car wreck... must've been going pretty fast to split atoms... hydrogen does not equal nuclear... same as plutonium or uranium.. you could smash either of them with a hammer or fire bullets at it all day long, 100% guaranteed, no nuclear explosions

If you use electrolysis to make the hydrogen, why not just, use the electricity to run a car directly, rather than losing 50% of the power to inefficiency?

Exactly. The combustion engine still has better performance, range, and price than any other type of engine we can put in a car

What when we run out of oil?

@goga.games18 my guy oil will run out when you and I are hardly a memory

@@goga.games18 you can run diesel engines on vegetable oil

@@brenscott5416 not at the increasing rate we are using it.we need to get away from crud oil for everything we can to save the crud for things that do not have alternatives. P.S. you only care about until you are gone?

I remember opie and Anthony on there show about that guy. He could drive from Cali to New York on a few gallons of water. Yes sir, like you said he's dead.

Wth are those words

@@alosreal Is there something you don't understand? I can clarify if you'd like.

@@alosreal It's like a catch-22 sort of paradox. You need x to get y, but also need to have y before you can have x. The energy needed to create and maintain the system would outweigh the benefit the system might present at the end.

Completely agree, this is an absurdity in terms of efficiency. Furthermore, it is an absurdity in terms of safety. Toyota, after lagging behind in EVs seems to have gone crazy...

lol at every one betting against Toyota!

Ah, but with your fuel at 20K, the Carnot efficiency goes through the roof! It'll be a lot higher than 15% efficiency. The main trouble is in keeping that fuel from weakening it's tank, absorbing heat from the environment and ceasing to be a liquid, destroying the car in the process.

Hydrogen engines are 60%+ efficient.

⁠you're right! An impressive 17% efficiency by making the engine slow as a snail.

​@abdillin its also actualy used And better batterys wouldnt only sell for EVs but also for phones ,tools and a lot else

I'm fairly sure you know that this is of course in conjunction with producing hydrogen from non-fossil sources, so it falls in between pure EV and e-fuels in terms of efficiency.

@@Asto508 So, instead of storing electricity in batteries, crack water into hydrogen? Sounds good, but it is super dangerous in so many ways.

@@robertpurdy701 Not more dangerous than Li-Ion bombs.

@@robertpurdy701 it really isnt. Water is a molecule made of atoms, not an atom itself

@@Asto508 There are no "Li-ion bombs"...

The issue is sustainability. Those batteries as they are now are very heavy, expensive, and NOT good for the environment at all. When this gets sorted out, I will look into one. Until then, I see little benefit kicking the can down the road.

@@BabyBugBug Nothing people do is "good for the environment" hydrogen cars especially combustion hydrogen cars have all the same problems as EVs x10. To get the hydrogen to your car IS actually worse for the environment than a gasoline car just like the EV haters incorrectly say about EVs. The issues with EVs are mostly solved, they haven't even begun to solve those issues with hydrogen. Just sitting in the garage to keep the hydrogen cold and a dense liquid would probably consume more energy than an EV does while its actually driving, and if you dont keep it cold it you have to vent it to atmosphere or it will literally blow up.

@@stinkwink695Explain how it is 10x worse than an EV. What is your evidence?

@@BabyBugBug I explained a few reason already, you literally have to dump your fuel source so you car doesn't blow up, sitting in your garage not moving your car will run out of fuel, fuel that takes far more energy to create and store than you get out of it moving your car.

@@stinkwink695​​⁠I was thinking more so hydrogen fuel cell technology as opposed to a combustion engine.

@Laurenceomance yet Toyota was able to make a hydrogen car as well as bmw.. Btw you are describing hydrogen correct? let me ask you this what about gasoline? It evaporates easily, it is highly flammable, and can possibly form explosive mixtures in air. Among other chemicals, gasoline contains other chemicals as well... So what is your point?

@@entername3840 you do know that the tanks that hold the nitrogen are pressurized. Do I need to tell you how that's dangerous? Also hydrogen flames are nearly invisible.

@@jonsnow3176 don't make assumptions check how the automobiles are making it safer... Check the bmw how they tackled it.

@Laurenceomance Based on your logic nothing is safe.. If you look at EVs they are unsafe as well... When driving a small Crack in the battery pack.. It could be due to manufacturing defect or a really sharp rock hitting the battery pack in a wrong angle will start a really bad fire you have seen people die in these fires.. Hell look at the deaths caused by mobiles... People die due to it exploding, causing fire etc.. Yet we use mobiles with litiium ion battery. My point is... We cannot get a 100% safe fuel... Gasoline has its drawbacks they made several trail and error and we are here... Hydrogen makes sense instead of EVs..i rather not throw away my entire car because of battery degradation. Not to mention if you want to charge I don't want to charge it in a unknown place and stay in the car for half an hour just to get it charged it's unsafe. EVs are good for short trips that is all, unless they find something groundbreaking which replaces lithium ion battery which is both environmentallly friendly as well as tackle all the above described problems.. Hydrogen is the best option for clean energy... Now for the engineering challenges yes there is a lot if we are able to put in highly flammable jet fuel into airplanes and make it safe then we can also find a way to make hydrogen safe we just need time for it.

@Laurenceomance Based on your logic nothing is safe.. If you look at EVs they are unsafe as well... When driving a small Crack in the battery pack.. It could be due to manufacturing defect or a really sharp rock hitting the battery pack in a wrong angle will start a really bad fire you have seen people die in these fires.. Hell look at the deaths caused by mobiles... People die due to it exploding, causing fire etc.. Yet we use mobiles with litiium ion battery. My point is... We cannot get a 100% safe fuel... Gasoline has its drawbacks they made several trail and error and we are here... Hydrogen makes sense instead of EVs..i rather not throw away my entire car because of battery degradation. Not to mention if you want to charge I don't want to charge it in a unknown place and stay in the car for half an hour just to get it charged it's unsafe. EVs are good for short trips that is all, unless they find something groundbreaking which replaces lithium ion battery which is both environmentallly friendly as well as tackle all the above described problems.. Hydrogen is the best option for clean energy... Now for the engineering challenges yes there is a lot if we are able to put in highly flammable jet fuel into airplanes and make it safe then we can also find a way to make hydrogen safe we just need time for it.

Or, hire some good audio engineers to just simulate it. Most consumers would never be able to tell the difference

Dwindling oil reserves and exploding EV sales beg to differ

@@litkeys3497 oil reserves are not dwindling...source: am actually a petroleum engineer and know the topic in depth

​@Laurenceomance more like driver is now a frozen but fine mist

4) everywhere

@@ccadi72001 bro 💀💀💀

Tanks with liquid wont blow up. Fluids are not compressable, why it would just leak out. If the air inside the tank would get compressed in the other hand.. but that is an easy fix

​@@Brightshadow686 Hydrogen is VERY VERY explosive. That's why it will blow up.

Huh?

Where would you get the hydrogen?