If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can submit a claim in 8 clicks or less without having to leave your couch. For more information, go to ForThePeople.com/TFL
@DHolmquistDesigns unless you don't let the Stang owner know 'its on', then no, sorry. Your plastic fantastic wrap your ass in fiberglass chevy isn't beating any 10 speed coyote post 2011. You might get the jump at a light but the 5.0 will reel you in every day, all day (stock for stock)
@@lancemannion4113 a second gen c4 LT1, let alone a LT4 will actually beat the car in the video in every category. First Gen. C4’s, no, of course not. You must not know a lot about cars.
It's been proven over and over...Jeep 392 is wayyyy better and faster than Braptor. Even that fake baja suspension, it's been tested in Dubai in the desert multiple times....not even close to the Jeep 392. Ford just trying to over hype it for competition. 392 all the way!!!!
I’ll take both of these except with a manual and track pack in the mustang. One to get my manual kicks and the other for awesome sound and off-roading and adventure. Best of both worlds right here.
Having owned a 392 Challenger, a Boss 302 Mustang, and a 21 Mustang GT, I knew exactly how this was going to go. The 392 is unmatched in low end grunt, but it falls on it's face above 5K RPM, the 5.0L is gutless down low, but pulls like a bat out of hell on the top end.
@@AnglerDanNE It really doesn't, the 10 speed auto gives that illusion, but it's a turd below 4K RPM. If you look at a dyno sheet, they only make about 240HP and 310lbs-ft at 4K, where the 392 is making 310HP and 370lbs-ft at the same RPM.
That closer ratios shift schedules helps hide the weight and any gear ratio gaps... a 392 with say the older 545rfe auto like I have in my Dakota, pair it with a 3.55 gear, you too can do 100mph in 3rd, after it does the 2-3shift at 70mph lol@@316Autos
Very interesting video, I enjoyed watching it. I have a 2013 Mustang GT and think it's a great car. If I ever want a Jeep that's close to the performance of my Mustang I will get the Wrangler 392.
I'm disappointed... as a mustang owner, you should know the 392 engine is big and bulky, the power drops due to weight... if the mustang just got on throttle a split second faster, it would have downshifted fast enough to blow past the 392 a couple lengths... and i'm guessing it isn't tuned, but the mustang will get loads faster, that 392 MIGHT get 10hp.
Man those 11-14 s197 mustang GTs are impressive! I have a 14 GT/CS w bolt ons and I’m gappin 392 boats left and right unless they’re heavily modded !! Super fun cars
I have a 2014 mustang GT and i love it. I really like you guys are using one in your videos as well. I was thinking for the roll races with the mustang, wouldn't it be better if you used sport mode and had selected the gear manually to start off in so it doesnt fall behind so much at the start of the roll race.
I have a 2014 GT and I love that car. It’s not a demon or gt 500 but it’s super fast for my need and with the 6 speed manual it’s a ton of fun!! I can’t believe it’s going to be 10 years since I got her!! I also enjoy watching these videos with the red mustang
The Mustang would still beat the jeep. Hell are the any dirt roads in America anymore that aren't on private property ? Off-roading is slowly becoming extinct to most of us Americans. There's nowhere to go
@zinc466 there is no doubt about that. But have no fear, it's only a matter of time before the entire country will be private or government property. So much for freedom anymore.
The DOHC 5.0 can rev and breathe better than the pushrods, that's why it can catch and overtake the Jeep despite the Jeeps excellent 8 speed. This is why it takes a much bigger displacement OHV engine to compete with it.
...Now, after watching the video I'm pretty surprised at how slow that "392" was compared to a stock mustang. There are a lot of fast SUV's on the road, this 392 wouldn't compete with other special edition 'SUV's'. odd! Interesting video nonetheless
Well that's because other suv have 700hp on average. The jeep only got 75 hp more than my ram 1500 and plus it's got massive mud terrains. It's not gonna compete with x5m or gl63amg for sure😅
I could be wrong but there are not many faster SUVs on the road. The 392 is faster than most all of them you may run into daily and the hellcat is faster than all but a couple that cost twice as much to possibly edge it out. Mopars 6 liter SUV's are pretty dominate on the road for a SUV. A select BMW M series or a AMG might be a touch faster than the 392 but not by much especially for the price difference. And those are slower than the hellcat equipped version. You need to look at a Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT for $200,000 to edge out a $100,000 Hellcat SUV and I can tell you what's the odds of running into either one of those in the streets. Got to give Mopar credit where credit is do for affordable performance SUV's. There are some modded Jeep Trackhawks and Durangos going down the 1/4 mile in the 8's, very impressive for 5000+ lb vehicles.
Having a 2013 GT and racing my wife's 2021 Grand Cherokee SRT for the last 3 years, I knew the results before even watching this. The GC has much better aerodynamics than the Wrangler, but I reel her in every time. That 6.4 is amazing, any my wife has a best of 13.0 at 104mph in the 1/4 at 2500ft elevation. That is nothing to balk at for a N/A SUV pushing over 5K lbs. But her extra 60HP cannot overcome a 1,500lb weight difference and the aero as well, even with AWD giving her a much better 60ft time. BTW, my best was 12.5 at 112mph stock. Just FYI for those that want a better idea of how much elevation affects time slips.
Cant believe how much elevation kills HP. A 3.6 camaro is faster at sea level than that mustang GT at elevation. I have a 2018 RS runs the 1/4 in 13.6 seconds at 106 mph. I bew elevation kills HP but didn’t realize that much. Im a snowmobiler live in upstate NY but been to Idaho and Montana a few times riding. The turbo sleds do a lot better at elevation than the NA engines turbos or forced induction don’t lose much if any power at high elevation. What about cars would it be the same thing turbos at elevation don’t lose power. The jeep actually impressed me more than the mustang didn’t lose by much. Good stuff thanks for sharing.
but honestly, who would expect a wrangler to keep up with them😂😂 I feel like with the right modifications that could definitely hurt some feelings lol…
Not surprisingly the outcome even using a older mustang. scat pack challengers typically loose to mustang GTs as well. However owning both a new Durango SRT392 awd and a newer mustang GT, im not shocked the Jeep jumped it in the 1/8 mile til it's weight caught up to it. If I was stoplight banging I'd take the awd 392 as well, but in the 1/4 you ain't beating the coyote once it gets the chance to stretch its legs although it's a pretty close race in the end.
I’ve had bad cuss’s, bad fords and bad chevys I mean bad by hot, and I love juice no matter what it’s in, I’ll drive the keep or the stang ,but utilize the juice on different terrain and be living my time
Crazy part is he is driving a 2014 mustang, 2015-21 mustangs are even better sitting at 460 hp instead of the 2014s 420 hp. And with the 10-speed it’s so fun but I’d prefer a manual to feel more in touch
470hp to the crank through those big off road tires... maybe 350whp. Making it equal to what the Mustang puts down too. "AWD" launch advantage but nothing after the first 100ft
I am texting this comment by the half way watching of this video,I always go with the gt500,even if it's a competition with GTR because mustangs are untouchables
Not really a great comparison. You're testing a jeep against a car. Factors like gearing,weight,rear differential. Put the Mustang Gainst a 392 Charger/Challenger. 392 should take the quarter mile every time, assuming the driver doesn't suck. Now in a roll race, that's a different story, in favor of the Mustang.
