forcing experimental injections on Canadians is a crime against humanity. remember when he built concentration camps to put the umvaxxed in? Nuremberg 2
I think there are too many people, regardless of skin color and/or ethnic background, that would support hate speech laws. These law will be used and/or abused by all political group. It's too much power to give to any person or group.
This one is most likely not worth the energy to fight. At most it ought to be clarified that only prosecutions of Quebec residents will take place, as it is clearly enough a compromise based on the absence of support for individual rights in that province, and the way they interact with the reality of vote block politics. The problem group in Quebec are the anglophones, not the Muslims.
Such a terrible development in our country. What’s frustrating is seeing how people in Canada are embracing this cultural change. As soon as it became acceptable to rat on your neighbour or colleague, everyone started doing it as a form of a power trip; whether it was COVID, racism, sexism, transphobia…I witnessed countless people turn against friends and family and even call the police on people who were let obeying orders. It is disturbing to realize that you don’t even need a big state to impose tyranny, the people will do it themselves if given the chance. People have to realize that the state will not be the first to come after you, it will be your own friends.
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *🎙️ Introduction and Overview* - Podcast host introduces topics: threats to free speech in Canada, India, and globally. 01:19 *🇨🇦 Bill C63 Overview* - Breakdown of Bill C63; focusing on censorship and hate speech. 03:33 *🚨 Concerns and Political Implications* - Exaggerated consequences of Bill C63 and potential political misuse. 08:52 *🇮🇳 Parallels with India* - Comparisons with India's censorship laws and their broad definitions. 11:03 *🌍 Historical and Global Context* - Historical comparisons and analysis of how various countries handle censorship. 14:33 *😂 Use and Misuse of Laws* - Satirical examples and financial implications of filing human rights complaints. 18:11 *💬 Defining Hate Speech* - Ambiguity and selective enforcement in defining hate speech under Bill C63. 21:14 *🚪 Future Laws and Optimism* - Future trajectory of free speech and influence of immigrants valuing free speech. 22:50 *🗣️ Free Speech and Blasphemy* - Discussion on the advocacy for legalizing blasphemy worldwide. 24:12 *🖥️ Technology's Impact* - Echo chambers created by the internet and the evolution of societal norms. 26:18 *🦈 Media and Perception* - Media-induced irrational fears and analogous situations in Canada. 28:08 *🇨🇦 Societal Draconianism* - Examination of draconian measures in diverse societies and political implications. 30:25 *📜 Lawmaking and Free Speech* - Canada's legislative process and the need for free speech advocacy. Made with HARPA AI
Early on, you nailed it. “Creating a tool your political opponents can use.” Exactly! I’ve been more liberal my whole life but will now be voting conservative. If Harper introduced these bills 15 years ago, all Liberals and NDP would immediately call out their authoritarian nature.
You're right, it's the same in the USA. Affluent people who need some kind of religious identity and don't even realize it, and who have the time and resources to try to control others.
they should just throw anyone in jail forever with no law broken. or for thinking about something. that is the aimpoint. what a sad state of affairs in that controlled country.
I am pretty sure that the guy who brought fifty percent of the human rights complaints worked for the human rights commission. Ezra Levant did an expose on it years ago.
What about antisemitic hate speech? Who granted those people Canadian citizenship? What is the meaning of Zero Tolerance? Bullshit. Nobody ever punished in Canada for antisemitism , antisemitic remarks and hate speech. The entire population of Canada is Antisemitic and government doesn't care. Disgusting.
These sorts of laws aren't a product of the internet. They've probably existed at least since the establishment of the first ruling class. It's a very fundamental human failing to shelter your own ego by assuming that people who disagree with you are wrong. Couple that with the power to punish people and you get speech laws.
Quebec had an antiJew antiMuslim law which finished passing a procedural challenge the day after the new hate law was announced. Clearly enough this is meant to throw Montreal Muslims who organized for the Liberals a bone with which to mollify themselves. It makes no sense to alienate them, as in Quebec, the majority will never support the rights of the individual one way or the other. Therefore it is not a free speech issue.
Remember that there are Academics in Identity/humanity/psychology/gender/grievance studies spheres, whose only mission is to find, publish, and consult(for consulting fees and grants) on an ever expanding list of micro aggressions, hurt feelings, power imbalances, and in general it's not my fault=you're being mean to me. Of course, graduates find their way to HR, Government, more Consultants, Tribunals, politics, activists, self-initiated societies/charities/think tanks/institutes/lobbies.
This makes me think that the way to go forward would be to shift the money over to antileftist intellectual activity while aggressively starving the left of resources. aggressively promote regional civic identity, in other words
@@avengemybreath3084 4. bigot a person who is intolerant of opinions that differ from their own 1. conflation the act or result of conflating 2. compassion deep awareness of the suffering of others coupled with the wish to relieve it 3. dissent to differ in opinion or to disagree
it's going to be struck down in court as unconstitutional as it not only goes against our right too free speech. it also proposes cruel and unusual punishments breaking or rights.
I wanted to share this video but the image you choose for a link preview is so reminiscent of a click-bite, sensationalist pages targeting naive audience that I refrained from doing so.
I don’t care I will still speak my mind freely and this will all get turned around and there’s gonna be a lot of unemployed government workers. Sorry not sorry.
Parents need to be in their kids lives and have access to parental controls, and teach their kids what to stay away from just ahead of their curiosity.
2 месяца назад
Wait...I thought there was mo issue with this Bill?
It hasn't even been passed, has it? It is very clearly a response to the Quebec antiJew antiMuslim law and intended to mollify Montreal Muslims who worked as Liberal organizers by allowing them the cold comfort of, their citizenship rights having been violated by their home province, the legislative shield to go after Quebec people who have gone out of their way to make an enemy of their mosque.
thus risking the algorithm if anything it makes perfect sense that this law would remain on the books, at most subject to a jurisdictional clarification that it be used only to hunt hate criminals in Quebec, where they do not believe in the rights of the individual regardless
My friend said to me last week that Margaret Trudeau was known to be quite a mason in her day. I scoffed and said I can’t see Maggie being the physical labour type. My friend assured me, oh no, she could lay a stone or two in here time.
