Canon 1DX Mark III | The FASTEST DSLR with 6K60 RAW Video 

Yeah, I'm guessing it will. I'm hoping for a video firmware upgrade for the ii that gets rid of motion jpeg for 4k video and gives us some usable formats

I'd absolutely buy the R5. It's so much better than the 1DX series in virtually ever area

@@learningcameras How about the R5 vs R6 ii which one will you pick ?

@@papabear7875 The R5 takes the edge for photos and the R6II takes the edge in most cases for video. The R5 does have more video framerates/resolutions, but it overheats easily, has time limits, and 4k60 isn't oversampled so I actually tend to use the R6II more for video and the R5 more for photos

Absolutely, all day battery life and every feature known to man! Basically it's the best camera around right now

Good point.. but he is referring mainly to DSLR's

Wait... Who is not praising the specs? I am! But I'm a reviewer so I have to mention any limitations but just because I mention a limit doesn't mean I'm not praising the camera

Sony reviewers been doing that for years lol. Whats wrong with praising video specs anyways? Like 90% of videographers in America use DSLRs or mirrrorless bodies to film professionally.

Nope, you need to go crop for that. Assuming that was a technical limitation and not intentional, I'm glad they at least gave us both options even if they are limited

At what crop does the AF come into play

I would have loved 4k 120 af at 2.5gb/s

Ali Saadi I think it’s a 1.3x crop for 4k60.

tominfhl i imagine that as well

They are not holding back. The amount of processing power it takes to shoot full-frame 4K 30 fps is significant. When you go to 60 fps, the processing power needed doubles. Canons autofocus is currently the best in the world. Again, when you go to 60 fps, the processing power needed doubles for the autofocus as well. When you combine the needed processing power for autofocus and reading the entire full-frame sensor at 60 fps, it's just too much for the camera to handle. You can shoot 60fps 4K using a cropped sensor mode. Part of the challenge is keeping the camera from overheating. The more processing power the camera uses, the hotter it gets. Panasonics new Full frame camera uses an internal fan to cool the chip. However, Panasonic's autofocus is not nearly as good as Canon's. I think Canon would need to add an internal fan in order to do 60 fps 4K with autofocus. The fan would make the camera significantly larger.

That's a good test!

They always talk about how this camera shoot raw but they never talk about the raw codec which is the most important information for the professionals that work with raw videos.. sometimes i feel like people excited about filming raw but they sound like they dont know much about raw.. the day i bought my c200 i couldn’t even use there raw light properly because of their codec wasn’t supported in much programs.. they are not giving any details about the codecs because they know people wont buy it if they cant use the raw mode until all the programs support it. Im not buying this until i know if i can really work with raw.. because other then 5k raw i dont see much difference from the 1dx mark ii..

Pentax K1

@@villageblunder4787 Yep, yet another one. Pentax always had some great features that most of the world pretended didn't exist too.

so you want more, for less?

@@screammachineman not only me... All the customers want this.

@@toxotis70 I'd love a $15k Mercedes S class too. Why won't Mercedes make one?!?!

Yup!!! That's what I'm hoping for too...ideally with a flip screen like the EOS R

I meant to say 1500 lol

I now have full faith that Canon can deliver the perfect mirrorless camera! The big question is if they will and when

Already fully jumped to Sony E-mount. Never looking back.

Don't blame you one bit lol

@@southpawluke Same, a9ii/ a7r4 all the gm glass

@@southpawluke Let us know when any Sony camera can shoot 16fps mechanical shutter (20fps in live view) with over 1k RAW photos before you hit its buffer, 5.5k 60p 12 bit RAW video and 4K 60p video at 4:2:2 10-bit in Log. Thanks!

video raw. just like photo raw. think about normal video as jpeg.

name another camera that can do 16fps mechanical shutter (20fps in live view) with over 1k RAW photos before you hit its buffer, 5.5k 60p 12 bit RAW video and 4K 60p video at 4:2:2 10-bit in Log. I'll wait...

its the price of a 1d . My 2007 1ds3 was already this price

The lens that professional sports photographers use with the camera are more expensive than the camera itself. It's a niche camera, unless you're Peter McKinnon and you use it to vlog.

Flippy screens have hinges that can and will break under rugged use. What 1DX pro user has been crying for a flippy screen? lol

@@michaelbell75 I would say that flip screens are extremely secure when they are not flipped out. Also, EVERY pro photographer has blindly held up their camera over their heads trying to get a shot especially after sports games or events. Can you imagine throwing it in live view and being able to flip a screen down, tap on the subject you want to focus on, and let the camera shoot 20fps!!! That would be a dream for many pros

@@learningcameras ...and yet pro sports photographers have been just fine without flippy screens haven't they?

@@michaelbell75 We accept whatever we have available. I shot weddings with a single card for a decade but I didn't have a chance. My bet is that IF the 1DX had a flip screen with good live view AF, every pro photographer would have the camera over their hands with the screen flipped down

I want a flippy screen on my 1DX.

Being positive about everything is a sign of a bad reviewer. Dan is pretty decent and level headed. Sometimes raving reviews aren't deserved.

don't agree with you

Curious what you thought was negative about this one??? Compared to the video I have going live in a few minutes, this was very positive lol! Actually really liked the camera and didn't really mention anything bad that Canon did. I do mention some limitations just in case those matter to you. For example, I shoot weddings and sometimes shoot 120fps but with audio. Not having audio is a big deal for me in case the bride were to say something special I don't have to slow the footage or so I can have natural audio in the background. I would feel like that is valuable info not really a negative review

I prefer a pragmatic point of view when it comes to tech reviews. Give me everything right AND wrong with a camera so I know what I’m getting myself into. As far as this review, there really wasn’t that much negativity anyway

@@learningcameras There is not a perfect camera yet, nobody has invented it yet; it is just that some cameras will be better for some situations compared to others. If you were the only reviewer of cameras in you tube, and if I would follow only your videos to seek a good influence to buy a new camera, I would never buy it. Camera manufacturers, as any other manufacturers of any good, try to stay competitive with new technologies, but there is always technical and market constraints that will define the blue print and final design of a new technology. After I watch your videos, I always end up with a bitter taste of whatever camera/accessory you are reviewing. There is no clarity on your recommendations/suggestions, because for every + you find a - right away. Your followers are not only professional photographers, there is also a bunch of amateurs like me or advanced photographers, trying to learn something new based upon an experienced opinion. My suggestion to you is that, as other camera reviewers do here in you tube, present a good summarizing table with all the pro's & con's and show a more positive perspective on what is the full potential of the camera and if the con's are realistically unimportant for any level of photographer, make emphasis on that. I know and understand when something is bad is bad and you have to say it, but you need to present a balanced examination. Put yourself in the shoes of the engineers developing these new cameras and ask yourself why they did not do what you were expecting, there must be a good reason for that. If tomorrow you get a brand new Mark IV, you will find right away what are the flaws of the new design and focus on that, rather than emphasizing the FULL POTENTIAL and you need to be more critical of what were the technical barriers that engineers found that impeded them satisfy your expectations. Even the Hubble telescope cameras had technical issues, but look at the bright side of all THE GREAT DISCOVERIES AND AMAZING PHOTOS THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED FROM THE HUBBLE TELESCOPE. Famous astronomers like Nicolaus Copernicus will be amazed by just looking at them and the advancement of technology.

Why? Other than being able to shoot electronic shutter without rolling shutter (and many photographers would prefer mechanical shutter anyway) The Canon is better by a ton. Also, way more expensive and developed for a particular audience but definitely better

The A9 shoots half as fast with mechanical shutter and has a much smaller buffer, so it will last longer because it’s slower. Oh wait, not fully weather sealed? Never mind.

Another sony fan with no proof haha. Double CFexpress card lets 1dx3 shoot 1k straight raw without buffer. Can shoot 4k60, 5.5k raw. 16 and 20fps on live. Tell me which sony body does this? Not to mention sonys inferior battery life, weather seal, customer services and lenses.