Canon R6 Mark II vs. Nikon Z6 III - Battle of the Sixes 

I went with the Nikon Z8 and Z6iii. Very happy. Thank you Camera Store.

If you have a Nikon S lens you can configure the auxiliary ring to become the "missing" 3rd controller dial.

It is also worth mentioning that Nikon can use flash with electronic shutter. This opens up this camera for macro photography enthusiasts. Because they make a huge number of clicks for the stacks and it is too wasteful of the mechanical shutter. That's why Olympus is so popular among them. It has electronic shutter synch since at least 2016 (E-M1 mark2).

Good comparison. Does really highlight how spoiled we are now. These midrange mirrorless bodies are outperforming the flagship DSLRs like the 1DxIII and D6 from just a few years ago, at a fraction of the price

I have a Canon R6 MK II I love it !!!!

The R6 II applies noise reduction at low ISOs even in RAW. And so it “cheats” a bit regarding dynamic range. This is the Nth time I’ve made this remark. It’s frustrating that this is still not mentioned in comparison videos between these two cameras. Oh and framerate-wise, the Canon can do 40fps RAW, however if you really have to catch a fleeting moment, the Nikon can do 60fps JPEG or 120fps crop JPEG. I know, it’s JPEG, but it can do it.

A major consideration is which ecosystem you are currently in. Not too many users will switch brand because of some perceived advantage in a new camera. Most will stick with their own brand and wait for the next new shiny thing because lens is what make for brand loyalty!

I'm holding on for the R6 mark 3, hopefully it get the stacked sensor.

I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. I am a nikon shooter, so I like the nikon more, but if I was a canon shooter, I am sure I would like the canon more. At the end of the day, no one cares which brand of camera you use, they only care how the pictures look.

Looks like Nikon lacks in autofocus, Sony and Canon are light years ahead of Nikon. But it comes down to the glass you're invested in, the camera body will be replaced regularly but a nice piece of glass can be hold on to for 20-30 years or more.

Nikon shooters can’t accept facts 😂.

But higher than 12fps canon can only do 12bit. Sorry but nikon is way better for fast action

Great comparison. Just like a camera canon wins for me so far because it currently has a price in most places that is $500 lower than when it came out, but I think Nikon will get that discount over time. I liked the ergonomics of Nikons before, when there was still a focus mode switch and a shutter mode selector, but now it has become more Canon-like and I think Canon is better in this. Nikon has a much better mount, in terms of affordable, balanced, non-nonsense lenses. RF mount is currently some kind of field for experiments for non standard lenses - they make telephoto lenses longer and darker, they "invented" the retractable zoom and presented it as a feature. Also they gives you a choice between a 50 1.8 for $200 and a 50 1.2 for $2000, but nothing that would fall into the category of a reasonable middle ground. And besides, they started to cheat in terms of distortion and vignetting, making lenses smaller and weaker, hiding it behind corrections - in short, I really don't like Canon's lenses policy. Nikon, on the contrary, is trying to fill the middle segment and is more open to third-party manufacturers.

I’m on team Nikon with a D750. But if I’d go to mirrorless, it’s either Sony or Nikon. The Canon lenses just don’t appeal to me.

So you forgot to mention Nikon Z 6 III technically has about 96 megapixels on pixel shift Definitely Nikon Z 6 III 100%.. Nikon is really making things a lot better. I cannot wait for the future for Nikon!!!... Far as Canon goes crickets tripping..

The nikon photos of the football compare to the canon look so much better. Canon is flat

Nikon has such nice colors, Canon's -- just blah

Nikon colors just blow the Canon away... Never mind the Nikon better lens selection ...

I hate asymmetrical card slots. No matter how fast your CFE-B is, your speed is always limited by your UHS-II card. It forces the photographer to choose between redundancy or buffer clearing. You also need to buy the more expensive card to shoot at 300MB/s. This is so frustrating, and yet some fanboys are cheering for this. Ridiculous.

The NIkon can only do jpegs in Pre-Capture but it can also do 60 or 120 frames which Canon cannot. So many reviewers leave that out.

and the winner is the "Iphone 16 pro"... it is just a joke :) ahahaha