Canon RF100-400, review with photos (close up, macro, wildlife, landscapes). 

My pleasure! 😀

Thank you so much for your comment Miles, really appreciated! 😀

Thank you for your comment Mam! 😀

Thank you so much for your comment Sir! 👍😀

Thank you so much Mohamed! Really appreciated! 😀👍

Thank you so much for your comment Alan, always very appreciated! 😀

Thank you so much Le o! ✌️😀

Oh! Thank you very much Ken! 😃 I just know that I have always been very lucky. 🍀 But your words are a great reward for what I do, and motivate me to.continue! ✌️😀

Thank you so much for your comment Jonny! 😀 Yes for that reasonable price, this lens offers a lot of fun. I was not using it much since I got the RF 100-500mm. But it is still a lens to consider if you want to pack light. Cheers! 😀✌️

@@Chrispitchwildlife The cost - so much easier than the 100-400 as well. Great lens and I forgot all about how awesome it was. 🤗💖

The best at this price. And on Amazon or B&H you have some good deals from time to time! I saw it at around 500USD already. 😄

@@Chrispitchwildlife Great price for sure. It allows many to get into wildlife at an inexpensive price!

On est d'accord! 😁 Moi aussi je veux in R6 mark 2! 🤩 Merci pour le commentaires. 👍😀

Thank you! I really appreciate that kind of comment! 👍😀

@@Chrispitchwildlife I'm just in the process of choosing a lens for my new R5, and this choice is not easy given a tight budget after buying an expensive body) so all of the above is absolutely sincere)) Thank you again!

@@MrKotische alright! Keep in mind that the R5 will have less reach than my R7. So maybe you want an even longer focal length depending of what you shoot... Have a look at some reviews on the new RF 200-800. But you may lose some close up capabilities and it's 3x more expensive, heavier, bigger(I never tested it though) Hard choices. 😁 Good luck! Cheers!

@@Chrispitchwildlife Yes thank you! I know about the existence of this lens. And the features of full-frame cameras. The R5, however, has the ability to crop, thereby “bringing” the object closer, with very high detail. Unfortunately, due to circumstances (and some disgusting actions of the leaders of my country), we live here in quite difficult conditions, including financial ones. We have a very strange market. And for some reason RF 200-800 costs more than RF 100-500L. Surprisingly. Therefore, I am not sure that I will have the opportunity to purchase such expensive lenses for wildlife photography as the RF 100-500 and RF 200-800. The RF 100-400, RF 800 f11 and Sigma 150-600 C version were considered. Good luck. Peace.

@@Chrispitchwildlife the choice of R5 was not spontaneous. Having an old Canon 40D, I spent several months choosing a new camera. I wanted a full-frame one, knowing well all the features of certain options. We are the same age, more or less, I think) But the experience is not that great, but long-lasting) And I have no experience at all in wildlife photography. I'm currently using my old first generation 70-300 IS USM DSLR EF lens. And I see that this is clearly not enough. I want more. There is so little beauty in this world. I wish there was more. And what you want to capture beautifully.

Thank you so much for your comment Bapun! What a cool comment! 😀 I like that lens and I am lucky that this video seems to work well. I just made a similar video (that doesn't work well) with that lens mixed with the RF800f11. If you want to see more pics. 🙄 I could not speak about the EF100-400 since I never used it though. Cheers! 👍😀

Thank you very much ch Leon, I am glad you liked it! 😀 I wish that robber fly would have stayed longer so I could try a tripod, or the in body bracketing stuff.

Hello Anthony, thank you for your comments! 😀 Alright, i hope you'll have fun! Me, I am thinking a lot about R5 since sometimes it is only 3000 us dollars. But I stay strong and wait what comes next. 😆

@@Chrispitchwildlife I have an r5 which I use a lot. I want to use the r7 more. Under the right conditions it can do very well.

@@RogerZoul yes, I know you have an R5, I checked all your comment before I answered. 😀 Me, I have 3 APSC cameras, I just made the mistake to by the X-T30 II, because it's so small cute! 😂 So now I am thinking:"would it be a good idea to have a big fat and solid full frame , like the R5..." Or just the R8. So I would have a camera that can handle better high ISO with a slightly better IQ and better low light performance, or is it not worth it... I don't know!!

@@Chrispitchwildlife For me, that R8 battery is a problem because i have so many r5 batteries. But a buddy of mine who has an R5 also recently bought an r8. He loves it for the size and better AF, and for the better low light performance. His says you need at least two batteries and maybe 4 (he shoots a lot of birds) and obviously the buffer is an issue. But it can do any job you ask of it, just not for very long. Since you like small, it may be right up your alley ! Good luck and keep making videos!!

@@RogerZoul alright, thank you Anthony! I always forget about the smaller battery... I will at least wait to see some reviews about the future R5 mark 2 before taking a decision. 👍 Cheers!

Yes, it's like shooting with a 600mm on a full frame. But with that comes other little problems related to the R7. A bit harder to focus in low light, a bit more noise, a bit more rolling shutter if you use electronic shutter etc. Thanks for the comment Hector! ✌️

@@HectorHAli I don't own a full frame Hector. But F5.6 to F8 is very dark I am afraid. You will need a tripod and non moving subjects I guess. Or a powerful torch. Good luck Hector! Thanks for the comment. ✌️🙂 Here a list of lenses: snapshot.canon-asia.com/ph/article/eng/key-specifications-of-rf-lenses?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw1920BhA3EiwAJT3lSbIXHb4dMPzU21umdqhOMVlK06dDZRWa8vzlWS0oASpX2W2tPS8H3xoCl5gQAvD_BwE

Thank you so much for you comment Nik! 😀 Canon R7

Thank you for your comment! 😀 What do you mean? 🤔

@@Chrispitchwildlife things around the filter size printed at the front of the element

Yep, I noticed that a few months ago. Could have been there since I bought it. I can not clean it. It's like the plastic was rubbed a bit. 🧐

Thank you for your comment! 😀 That was the first time I used a telephoto lens to do landscape. Landscape is not something I do. So I guess, I meant: "what a guy with experience who did thousands of photos in this genre would have done here". "What composition would he have seen" etc. I am very curious about it. 🧐 That said, I like the first picture I show with the layers. Cheers! 😃

Yeahhhh! Thank you so much for your comment! 😀

Thank you so much for your comment Thegorn. Yes, internal zooms are in theory a bit more dust resistant, and also heavier, bigger, more expensive. (In theory)✌️ I have my RF100-400mm since 2 years. I'll tell you in 5 years if a notice a dust problem, and how I'll fix it. Cheers! 😄

I am so glad you decided to comment about things on my channel Sir Palane! Thank you! ♥️

Thank u Regie! 😀