Тёмный

Capital in the Twenty-First Century 

CUNY Graduate Center
Подписаться 18 тыс.
Просмотров 182 тыс.
50% 1

The French economist Thomas Piketty (Paris School of Economics) discussed his new book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century at the Graduate Center. In this landmark work, Piketty argues that the main driver of inequality-the tendency of returns on capital to exceed the rate of economic growth-threatens to generate extreme inequalities that stir discontent and undermine democratic values. He calls for political action and policy intervention. Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia University), Paul Krugman (Princeton University), and Steven Durlauf (University of Wisconsin--Madison) participated in a panel moderated by LIS Senior Scholar Branko Milanovic. The event was introduced by LIS Director Janet Gornick, professor of political science and sociology at the Graduate Center.
Cosponsored by the Luxembourg Income Study Center and the Advanced Research Collaborative.

Опубликовано:

 

21 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 209   
@greg55666
@greg55666 10 лет назад
The video starts around 9:30.
@GradCenterCUNY
@GradCenterCUNY 10 лет назад
Missed "Capital in the 21st Century" on April 16, feat. French economist Thomas Piketty, Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, & other economic scholars? Watch it on the GC's RU-vid channel.
@nathanlazarus190
@nathanlazarus190 10 лет назад
Oh, I've been refreshing the RU-vid page for a week hoping to see this. I was really upset to miss the live stream. Thanks so much for putting this up!
@windokeluanda
@windokeluanda 10 лет назад
Great Phrase at 1:14-1:15 (hour:minute): "Talent for rent seeking"!
@kathleenmckeon9926
@kathleenmckeon9926 9 лет назад
I loved the book, thanks to all who put in the hard work and to Piketty.
@ReeceofConsciousness
@ReeceofConsciousness 10 лет назад
Thank you Krugman for writing about this work in the newspaper.
@KarlBonner1982
@KarlBonner1982 10 лет назад
I was REALLY hoping they would have discussed worker ownership of capital goods as one way to make capitalism less unequal.
@chadryan1335
@chadryan1335 10 лет назад
KarlBonner1982 I would recommend Robert Dahl's 'Preface to Economic Democracy', which, if you haven't read, addresses this issue specifically (and quite nicely, I think).
@l-y-d-s
@l-y-d-s 10 лет назад
The idea of "the stupid rich don't stay rich for long" is now proven to be false, inheritance is a very large factor.
@s._.ushitrash
@s._.ushitrash 2 года назад
we need to tax on rhem
@jt7322
@jt7322 6 месяцев назад
introductory speaker has 10/10 anime hair, absolutely stunning
@guydauncey
@guydauncey 10 лет назад
Yes, this IS important - thank you for making this available to the whole world. It is good to know that the trend that Thomas Piketty lays out is NOT a remorseless law of economics; it is a trend which will the rich will work to increase whenever the state fails to organize for the benefit of those who are not in the 1%.
@DavidCohen
@DavidCohen 10 лет назад
#Piketty #Krugmann #Stiglitz sur *Capital in the Twenty-First Century* dernier livre de Piketty 1h30 de conférence ça mériterait des sous-titres
@valerynoel6972
@valerynoel6972 10 лет назад
Great Book!!!!! A must read.
@samsaluni
@samsaluni 10 лет назад
Thank u thomas Godbless!
@sondeg
@sondeg 3 года назад
Avec cet accent je comprends tout ce qu il dit, c est top !
@enriqueadiana1822
@enriqueadiana1822 10 лет назад
Great education! Please don't forget "Economics One" by Paul Samuelson, and the exclusive opinion that "countries have only two options: manufacturing BUTTER or CANON". Old generations were educated with basic formulas, and I sorry that we are call as "humanity". Please accept my ignorance. Henry.
@greg55666
@greg55666 10 лет назад
Thomas is right, it will take another amendment to the constitution. Tax on income is one thing, but tax on wealth is another. A tax on wealth would actually require confiscating property. Boy do I hope I live to see the day! How amazing would that be!
@mysillyusername
@mysillyusername 10 лет назад
yes, but it's NET wealth of course.
@greg55666
@greg55666 10 лет назад
mysillyusername What is "net wealth"? I am pretty sure that is redundant--if you don't have it, you don't have it. You can't have less than you actually have. I had never thought about this before. I'm not sure this is what you are implying, but it is obviously what Piketty has in mind. At first I thought, wait, if we only tax wealth, then what happens if they just spend everything? But that is ENTIRELY the point. The problem is held wealth is not helpful to the economy. If they spend it, that is fine because it creates jobs and circulates the money. Very interesting.
@mysillyusername
@mysillyusername 10 лет назад
greg55666 NET wealth: to understand, consider someone who takes a mortgage to pay for a 10 million dollar home, based on a very high current income as CEO, the first year their net wealth would be essentially zero and by the end of the mortgage their net wealth would be 10 millions. Current property taxes are on gross wealth, that is you are taxed irrespective of whether you have fully paid the property or not. That's a rather important difference. If you inherit the home it would add to your net wealth and be taxed, if you purchase the home on credit, it would only add to wealth as you pay the credit back. A tax on net wealth does not discourage wealth accumulation - a property tax like the ones in place in most countries do.
@greg55666
@greg55666 10 лет назад
mysillyusername Oh I see what you mean. Assets minus liabilities. Yes, sure. You're looking at it the opposite way from me. I thought you were talking about spending the money rather than being taxed on it. You're talking about borrowed wealth not being considered wealth. That's probably fine.
@fliteshare
@fliteshare 10 лет назад
mysillyusername Wealth as such isn't too much of a problem as long as it is used toward consumption. The problem occurs when wealth is used to acquire "means of production". And now labour of others is used to grow wealth artificially.
@racechick2033
@racechick2033 10 лет назад
Dynasties and oligarchy. I am going to buy this book. Thank you.
@Niklas323
@Niklas323 10 лет назад
I find it quite difficult to understand Piketty's accent.
@tedhu262
@tedhu262 10 лет назад
love TP's non-partisan matter of fact data driven perspective.
@renegonzalezdelavina6156
@renegonzalezdelavina6156 10 лет назад
Excellent
@KlavierEum
@KlavierEum 10 лет назад
I'm a stock investor and started reading the book in Korea just for personal interest. I feel a little bit excited while reading this book, I think he took the 'scientific correctness' (but not mathematical correctness) of economics to a whole new level.
@sergioreubensoto236
@sergioreubensoto236 10 лет назад
There is a contribution in the same direction of Piketti's proposal at the very year of the 2009’s grand depression on www.latindex.ucr.ac.cr/econ003-04.php in Spanish. And a further contribution on microeconomics conditions at the firm’s level at revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/economicas/article/download/8008/7630 also in Spanish.
@philliproy2995
@philliproy2995 6 лет назад
The trend about which wrote Picketti, there are more than 40 years. He written about that was obvious even to no economists. )))
@100kby35
@100kby35 9 лет назад
OMG that's how you pronounce Thomas pikkety
@bajawkamare
@bajawkamare 10 лет назад
It would be great if this analysis could be extended to quantify how much of the capital accumulated is from the colonial period and from fossil fuel extraction. We know the Koch brothers are 2 of the top 10 wealthiest in the USA, and that they made their money from fossil fuels and vulture funds. I guess that inequality not only undermines the political context of the countries where the wealthy reside, but also, contributes to under development in the global south. Most importantly I would argue is that a big chunk of the wealth generated contributes to climate change and threatens planetary survival.
@mysillyusername
@mysillyusername 10 лет назад
Piketty discusses some of these issues in his book, particularly colonialism and slavery. He also talks about sustainable growth.
@bajawkamare
@bajawkamare 10 лет назад
mysillyusername Thanks for the tip; need to read the book now : )
10 лет назад
Ladies and gentleman, Thomas Piketty, author of Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
@azenkwed
@azenkwed 5 лет назад
Ze modesty of Picketty iz striking.
@javlonjuraev6328
@javlonjuraev6328 3 года назад
No wonder Americans hail Roosevelt - look how much equality his policies brought!
@eebbeerrttpp
@eebbeerrttpp 10 лет назад
I thank a lot Piketty for his great work... but I can barely understand what he says... Honestly, his English gives me a headach... I think he should speak in French and have a very good translator...
@ReGZ0089
@ReGZ0089 10 лет назад
Think they should of had David Harvey here as well, only fair.
@Ou8y2k2
@Ou8y2k2 10 лет назад
Nouriel "Dr. Doom" Roubini would be nice.
@VelhaGuardaTricolor
@VelhaGuardaTricolor 6 лет назад
To say fish live in the water is enough for most people. They understand what you are saying, unfortunately to others you need to explain gills, dissect one show its parts, name each one and classify it, then they believe you. Well I will say what I have to say in the version for intelligent people ( the first group ) Inequality is the source of every single problem in society, has ever been and it will always be.
@MrRobloureiro
@MrRobloureiro 10 лет назад
Nice debate - Thomas Piketty´s book.
@ritornelloandrefrain
@ritornelloandrefrain 9 лет назад
wish richard d. wolff had participated in this event, which was interesting in any event.
@jpollard117
@jpollard117 10 лет назад
It is so nice that they reviewed Piketty's book. Unfortunately once it tells them what they want to hear all further review of his data is absolutely void. Luckily the FT did the work none of these geniuses were able to perform!!!!!!!!!!!!
@jpollard117
@jpollard117 10 лет назад
gespilk A conclusion searching for statistics. Even his own conclusions do not seem to grasp many of the potential problems are policies he supports. Now he needs more policies to fix those likely caused by the ones he supports. His bias is toward his preformed conclusion, which he denies in a CNBC interview. He is clearly a liar and there is no way he started the project thinking all is well but discovered this inequality. So sad anyone would believe his bullshit.
@jpollard117
@jpollard117 10 лет назад
gespilk "You must see that the ultimate high of the capitalism is when one person will own everything there is." Let us be clear. There is no way to convince a brainwashed ideologue of anything they don't already believe. Your statement is profoundly ignorant. It is so detached from reality that you are not able to think freely. Only one system allows for such a claim and that is collectivism which you obviously support. By definition the "ultimate high" is impossible in capitalism and has never even remotely taken place in capitalism. The only instant were this has nearly occurred is collectivism. Read his book and find the specific definition of capital - it is all over the place. He has no clue about monetary events. Piketty clearly states in interviews that this is not science and it is his take on the data. Economics is not science and hence your r > g has no definition of g and worse that definition has changed over time. As a scientist I find your thinking simply mindless highlighted by the masterful "ultimate high" delusion.
@jpollard117
@jpollard117 10 лет назад
gespilk As stated “let me be clear”. You are either unable or unwilling to think freely. The definition of economics is not in question, so please cut and paste the part of the post that paralyzed your ability to maintain reality. r > g where g refers to growth or GDP. GDP is defined differently at different times in history in more than one way. But let us just take its value in dollars or pounds when gold backed those currencies and the value when there is no backing. Due to imposed inflation, real and nominal growth have deviated in the currencies listed, so which one is being used - you don’t know because you never thought of it and worse no one ever told you what to believe other than what you believe now. And nicely you drive a nail in the point by the void left in your rich/poor challenge. Really, do you have a definition of rich and poor? like magic everyone can read your mind. The class of highly skilled working wealthy is much different than the wealthy non- working renter. The same is true of the poor. Thus, the gap between groups has very different causes. Again, no one told you what to think. How exactly is this not a waste of time.
@omegapointil
@omegapointil 7 лет назад
Anything in there about who tells payroll departments how to distribute revenues?
@gmshadowtraders
@gmshadowtraders 10 лет назад
1:28:36 - Paul Krugman says that the wealth of Bill Gates is not properly earned. Go get 'em Paul! Milk those rich cows for all they've got.
@yinghanfu9047
@yinghanfu9047 9 лет назад
Where are the trolls? All trolling the Krugman videos?
@sainchawlonen
@sainchawlonen 10 лет назад
this panel needs Micheal Hudson
@djhdjdhjdjdhhdh8524
@djhdjdhjdjdhhdh8524 8 лет назад
😇
@mrrefund7535
@mrrefund7535 9 лет назад
You should have researched REFUND$. People live REFUND 2 REFUND. Think about that.
@pjamesbda
@pjamesbda 10 лет назад
Clarity....there is no substitute for it. How is wealth redistributed? If you can step away from the personal part of it. Of course this is difficult, when the baby is crying for food, and your children are turned out into the streets. Neither can any marriage survive it. But Ray Dalio (the largest Hedge fund manager in the world) brought clarity to me. Such a good man. He dispassionately explains that Greece, like many other countries, is "debt saturated", and thru the austerity measures described in this video, are undergoing a de-leveraging cycle. Charlie Rose Show: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates And what does that mean? It means after the working populace have their wages systematically driven down, their unions destroyed, and their jobs out sourced, easy credit is extended to "help them" out, until one day, there are not enough assets to cover their debts. Then, these assets are "called in" thereby de-leveraging the lenders financial exposure. This cycle amasses massive funds. In fact it gathered more net worth than Google, Amazon and E-Bay combined for Bridgewater Asset Management.
@christianolsen9764
@christianolsen9764 10 лет назад
+TM LUTAZ Read the book and please stop writing. then hate. By hating before hand and calling it dismissable and irrelevant is possibly the dumbest thing i've ever heard. ''I haven't tried chicken but i hate how they taste like licorice'' that's u Lutas. Now u seem rather informed, but jumping to conclusions and not being able to critic both a product and one's own information, and then do judgement of a product, is a bad bad bad bad standard for evaluating the authenticity of a product. My advice educate yourself by reading the book like everyone here advices u to.
@chinacat9992
@chinacat9992 10 лет назад
Excellent comment.
@user-wn6ek5xv2s
@user-wn6ek5xv2s 4 года назад
So, Lecture Future Crisis No. 4: Bank Banking - What Will We Leave For Our Children? The collapse of the entire market economy and the financial system of the world. Devaluation - Dollar. Imagine Bankrupt of All Banks of the World - How Many People Will Affect Staff Investors, Customers.The scenario of the development of events and consequences. Introduction - All Data is Based on Figures and Naturally, On the Analysis of History. Having analyzed: All Crises In a row ,. Military Actions Around the World. To understand - what country at what time - quickly got up - on her feet financially, economically, psychologically. World - All Countries of the World - Sorry! This is the Initial Model of the USSR from 1945 to 1970! Beginning of the Future Crisis (Stone Age) - 1 Sign - Bank Collapse. 2 Cash Out. 3 Financial and Economic Institutions Nothing to Do - Could Not! Warren Buffett's words: "All the Banks - Played Over!" Yes exactly! Banks - Financial Needle! % Accrual System - Doesn’t Take into account Errors: From Inflation - Planet Resources, Natural Disaster, Human Factor, Elementary - Dollar Jumps on the Exchange Every Day - And% Accrual System - Same Stable - How ?, ... Hundreds, Thousands Factors! In 2008, Spruce Economy Restrained by 1 Industry - Real Estate - Oversupply! Friends Oversupply - In All Economic Financial Industries! List of Industries I will Provide later. After - Sorting and Selection - Strategically Important for the Country and Competent Redistribution of Current Resources Between Industries: Equipment, Production, Administrative, Squares, ... All - The World is Tied to the End Currency (US Gold Reserve Relation to the Current Moment 1 Dollar = -10000 Dollars Lecture No. 3, I will leave it at the end). What is happening now in the financial and banking sector of the world? This: 1 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) Assets: $ 4,009 billion. China. 2 China Construction Bank Corporation Assets: $ 3,400 billion. China. 3 Agricultural Bank of China Assets: $ 3,235 billion. China. 4 Bank of China ltd Assets: $ 2,991 billion. China. 5 Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Assets: $ 2,780 billion in Japan. 6 JPMorgan Chase Assets: $ 2,533 billion. 7 HSBC Holdings plc Assets: $ 2,520 billion. UK (England) 8 BNP Pariba Assets: $ 2,357 billion France. 9 Bank of America (BoA) Assets: $ 2,281 billion. 10 Crédit Agricole Assets: $ 2,117 billion France. 11 Wells Fargo & Co. US $ 1951 billion 12 Japan Post Bank Japan $ 1,874 billion 13 Citigroup US $ 1842 billion 14 Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Japan $ 1,775 billion 15 Deutsche Bank Germany $ 1,765 billion 16 Banko Santander Spain $ 1,736 billion 17 Mizuho Financial Group Japan $ 1,715 billion 18 Barclays Plc England $ 1,532 billion 19 Societe Generale France $ 1,531 billion 20 Groupe BPCE France $ 1512 Billion Here you have the Countries by Rating - Disasters! SOS! @, EuropeanUnion, Japan, UnitedKingdom, Germany, Spain, - Hands Shake When I Write This! China - Generally Calm! And here the USA - Will Hold - Until the Last. And lie! A list of countries by the number of banks included in the “top 100 by total assets". Rating Country Number of banks in the top 100 European Union 36 China 18 USA 12 Japan 8 France 6 Great Britain 6 Canada 5 Germany 5 Spain 5 Australia 4 Brazil 4 South Korea 4 Sweden 4 Italy 3 Netherlands 3 Singapore 3 Belgium 2 Switzerland 2 Austria 1 Denmark 1 India 1 Norway 1 Russia 1 Taiwan 1 Dear Ukraine! The Main Sign of Inflation - Remember This Date Forever - It's Already 6 Monetary Inflation - The Same Rake! - The National Bank of Ukraine from September 25, 2019 gave banks the right to round off cash transactions in connection with the withdrawal of cash of small denominations of 1, 2 and 5 cents from cash circulation. When Will We Learn To Correct Our Mistakes? So Souls Suffered! No - Greed, Pride, All In Its Mouth! Tear up Baby! Greed Fraera Destroy! Decision: 1. Refusal of the Old Economic, Financial, Banking System of the World. Development - New Observing Interests of the Planet, Children, Animals, People! Considering the Latest and Planned Future Technologies. 2. Properly, Correctly, Distribute Existing Resources of Countries, Planets, Continents. Taking into account the Crisis! 3. Entering the Arena of 5 International Currencies - Not Subject to Inflation, Default, Crash! 4. The New System of State Enterprises - Strategic Industries - Property of Residents of the Country. 30% - DEVELOPMENT OF OWN PERSONNEL, 30% - NEEDS OWN PERSONNEL, 30% - PRODUCTION, 10% Management Board 40 people For managing this enterprise. This is Only 1 Industry - Banks. P.S. - May the Lord Protect you All! Save And Save You All May It Be So! In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ the Holy Spirit Amen 8 Times!
@DucksDeLucks
@DucksDeLucks 9 лет назад
I have four concerns about this sort of discussion. 1. We need to recall that inequality as such is not objectionable, since people do not work equally hard or care equally about material goods. Moreover, most people would rather be poor in a rich society where even the poor have lots of stuff, than rich in a poor society where even the rich lack electricity and plumbing. 2. We must not sever the connection between individual effort and wealth, since the ability to provide for oneself and one's loved ones is one of life's greatest satisfactions. 3. We should not think of ourselves as taking a pre-existing pool of wealth and distributing it as on a bread line. The pool of wealth is what individuals create and their effort reflects their confidence or lack of it that they will be allowed to choose their work and keep a good portion of their earnings. 4. If I earn money and choose to give it to my heirs, why punish me for that? The alternative is spending it on stuff I don't want since otherwise the government takes it.
@lindmo
@lindmo 9 лет назад
DucksDeLucks I have four comments on your "concerns". 1. I agree that inequality as such is not objectionable, but not for the reasons that you state. People certainly don't work equally hard, but this does not translate to fair pay. A schoolteacher working 10 hours a day in a slum school might easily work harder than someone inheriting a lot of wealth and living on rent. A manager earning $1.000.000 does not automatically work less hard than a manager earning $10.000.000. Also, on your point about it being better to be a poor in a rich society than the other way around, you completely ignore psychological issues such as feelings of injustice and depression that arise when comparing yourself unfavourably to your neighbours. 2. Once again, individual effort and wealth are not automatically linked. Many work really, really hard in their professions, but since they are not paid much, will never benefit as much as for instance someone with inherited wealth. And the exact same job performance in the same job can be paid very different from one country to another. 3. I don't understand what your are saying here. Do you take into account limited resources (like plots of land/property and natural resources) and unequal opportunities based on the education and wealth of parents (like the difference between being born in Norway or Somalia?) 4. In understand your point psychologically. I too, would like my children to be as well off as possible and benefit from everything I earned in my life time. But you thus favour what is best for a small percentage of the population (that has a surplus of wealth to give away) which will make wealth more linked to family dynasties rather than hard work (which seems to counter some of your other points). However, I think that it is better to consider what is the best solution for the society as a whole. If a part of inheritage goes back to the nation, it will be redistributed back as a benfit for everyone in the form of better education, roads, health care, pensions etc.... while even the children of the rich would have to work a bit to develop their inherited wealth. They still gain many benefits being born into a resourceful family.
@DucksDeLucks
@DucksDeLucks 9 лет назад
Arne Kristian Lindmo 1. I didn't say everyone gets what they deserve in relation to how hard they work. It is just a ceteris paribus effect. As for the psychological pain of knowing someone else is making more money for the same work, that is a small price to pay. Envy is not an emotion we should take as morally authoritative. 2. If you want more money, go for it. But not everyone wants more money. 3. You cannot perfectly equalize opportunities. You cannot redistribute what has not been created in the first place. You could force people to work at gunpoint but that leads to a bad life for everyone. In my view the only correct objection to inequality is that it affects the political process. So take steps to limit that. Otherwise, the government should stand back and stop trying to manage people's lives for them. We are very lucky to be as wealthy as we are and should stop pretending it's 1740 and millions are starving (in the West.)
@lindmo
@lindmo 9 лет назад
DucksDeLucks I am not talking about envy, but about injustice. The kind of injustice that has caused historical upsets such as The French Revolution, The American Revolution and The Russian Revolution. The reason why Americans rebelled and refused to pay taxes (could just as well call it rent) to the English was because Americans thought that is was unfair that so much of the fruits from their hard labour went to someone who didn't lift a finger to contribute. They did not rebel because the were envious. in other words, I am worried about politcal unrest. Also, I never said we should PERFECTLY equalize opportunities. That is ridiculus. I meant that we should make it at least possible for working people to succeed if they work hard enough and want it bad enough.
@ekthaKC
@ekthaKC 9 лет назад
Arne Kristian Lindmo can't wealth flow from rich to poor by free market activities naturally? does the government actually need to forcibly tax the rich.... the rich would not see any valid reason to do this, we would enter an era of large scale top level corruption where rich use every possible means to hide their wealth and show a false lesser wealth profile. Cheating the state will become common.
@lindmo
@lindmo 9 лет назад
ek_tha_KC 1. Wealth does NOT flow from rich to poor naturally. Thomas Piketty proved that very well in his book - so I take it that you have not read the book on which this video is based? 2. We already have an era of large scale corruption where the rich use every possible means to hide their wealth (have you ever heard of swiss bank accounts?) or buy politicians to make favourable laws. Cheating the state IS common. 3. Forced taxation is the only way to fund public projects for the well-being of most people. If everyone (including me and you) could choose their own tax levels - do you really think we would prosper as a nation?
@100kby35
@100kby35 9 лет назад
The more I learn how ignorant most Americans are to inequality in their own country, the more I care less about them and wish on them more exploitation at the hands of their elite. I keep trying to convince Americans that they need to tax their rich more so they'd have a higher standard of living rather than be subject to hardship. They just dismiss me and continue to brown nose the rich, spouting mantras about how rich people are great. Even though I am not an American, I can easily buy an S&P 500 index ETF and profit from the growing disparity between growth and capital in the US compared to economic growth. About half of American capital (including stocks and bonds) is foreign owned anyway, so the whole world is exploiting the American worker. American workers should either vote to tax the rich or get back to work and be good wage slaves by paying their taxes so global investors can collect dividends and interest.
@Lucian86
@Lucian86 9 лет назад
Richard Pallas "they need to tax their rich more so they'd have a higher standard of living rather than be subject to hardship"...that's so ideological and wrong. Btw, France has taxed the rich a lot lately. How's that working for you ?
@100kby35
@100kby35 9 лет назад
TLC Ever since the 70s inequality had gone up significantly. We are not that far along the Laffer curve.
@arno222444
@arno222444 9 лет назад
TLC And why France is in trouble? Because most of their competitors (Germany, UK, USA....) have sacrified their middle class by cutting salaries and benefits. And now France is not able to compete anymore. The only solution to get back on track will be to cut salaries and benefits too..... What a great solution, it will create more inequality, more crimes, more pain, the life expectancy will decline, the upper class will have to live in closed area with walls and guards.... If you double the taxes for the rich they will keep continue to have exactly the same life style, if you reduce the salaries of the lower class by 10% it is a disaster for them. What a sad world we are living in.....
@Lucian86
@Lucian86 9 лет назад
arno222444 Wow..didn't think about that...it's so easy...take money from the rich (they'll keep the same life style anyway) and give them to the poor. It will work. Sure it will..it's mathematics.
@arno222444
@arno222444 9 лет назад
TLC This is ironic and you don't address my point anyway. In fact if you live in the USA you have the reverse situation because the rich pay less taxes than the poor or the middle class just because the labor is more taxed than the capital. Is it good for the stability of your society? I don't think so.
@javlonjuraev6328
@javlonjuraev6328 3 года назад
That unbuttoned shirt is so distracting 🤣 oh you french
@boyax7825
@boyax7825 4 года назад
mark blyth
@DoNotPutinMouth945
@DoNotPutinMouth945 3 года назад
That’s all real nice, one problem, the hyper rich don’t pay income tax, if they do it ends up representing ~1% of their wealth, if you want to see this for yourselves, go look at any sec 10k report, and take a gander at the executive compensation section. Capital gains constitute ~99% of these salaries which wouldn’t throw this method off so much if not for the Delaware problem. You’ll quickly notice 3/4 massive companies are registered in Delaware. Weird, right? Ohhh wait it’s because Delaware offers LLC registration and by default counts a share of any LLC’s stock as $0.000001 par share. No gains, no income, no tax, no data, but this consortium of demons already knows all that! 😃 we’re all gonna die!!! Thanks guys 🤠🤑🤮
@davisoneill
@davisoneill 10 лет назад
Taxation is really not any kind of answer to the problem. The problem is efficient allocation of resources, and linking production to the full range of social needs - including the need for full employment, housing, birth rates, education, etc. It clear that Capitalism is too chaotic and pathological to ever do this in an efficient manner. The USSR failed because it did not have the have information technology necessary to plan demand and supply. That technology is now available, and Peak Oil will force us to adopt central planning of all sectors or the economy. .
@Nygaard2
@Nygaard2 10 лет назад
Yes it is. Since it's the simplest way to redistribute wealth - which is why it has been used since humanity started its move towards civilization.
@davisoneill
@davisoneill 10 лет назад
Magnus Nygaard Taxation wasn't invented to redistribute wealth, but to finance armies.
@Nygaard2
@Nygaard2 10 лет назад
davisoneill Yes - and who were fighting in these armies?
@davisoneill
@davisoneill 10 лет назад
Magnus Nygaard So, in essence, you are not saying taxation is the best way to distribute wealth, but war is? However, this does not seem to be true. After most wars, the general population were poorer, not richer.
@Nygaard2
@Nygaard2 10 лет назад
davisoneill Sorry, not true. I know it's harsh, but periods of rebuilding after wars often result in a broader distribution. It also happened after the Black Death, btw. Now I'm not advocating war as an economic method - but I do think most problems can be solved with a fair taxation system.
@tomatobrush3283
@tomatobrush3283 9 лет назад
A french economist? did not know there was such a thing any more. I am guessing his solution to everything is more government?
@chazdomingo475
@chazdomingo475 4 года назад
No, decapitations.
@NomadicCapitalTV
@NomadicCapitalTV 10 лет назад
Capital in the 21st Century Book Review Video Review in Response
@DucksDeLucks
@DucksDeLucks 9 лет назад
The second speaker (who doesn't know when to shut up) says the poor don't live as long but I would like to see the figures for those individuals who have finished high school and committed no felonies. I suspect most or all of the difference would disappear.
@lindmo
@lindmo 9 лет назад
DucksDeLucks You base your argument on a guess.
@DucksDeLucks
@DucksDeLucks 9 лет назад
Arne Kristian Lindmo Sometimes ya just have to express your intuitions. Mine are often right. I would be willing to put money on it but not over the internet.
@lindmo
@lindmo 9 лет назад
DucksDeLucks "One of the most basic indicators of well-being is life expectancy. Analysts have long recognized the powerful association between personal income and expected life spans. People with higher incomes tend to live longer than people with lower incomes." Quote is lifted from www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2012/10/23-inequality-life-expectancy-burtless Seems your intuition is dead wrong.
@DucksDeLucks
@DucksDeLucks 9 лет назад
Arne Kristian Lindmo That would tend to show that women are better off than men and have been for as long as we have records.
@lindmo
@lindmo 9 лет назад
DucksDeLucks I don't understand your point.
@danfive9696
@danfive9696 10 лет назад
French guy is not understandable.
@mysillyusername
@mysillyusername 10 лет назад
***** I understood every word, your problem is probably with the English language.
@SJ-oi7tk
@SJ-oi7tk 10 лет назад
Somehow, I'm guessing Piketty's English is better than Dan's French. That said, it wouldn't hurt to add CC titles for all the speakers. The material is often very dense.
@fvveb2141
@fvveb2141 10 лет назад
That unbearable French accent though.
@mkmc94
@mkmc94 10 лет назад
those american people so fucking arroguant. learn second language before talking about accent tard !
@fvveb2141
@fvveb2141 10 лет назад
mkmc94 But… I am FRENCH and speak French , English, Russian, and Spanish with a perfect accent. So shut the fuck up.
@mkmc94
@mkmc94 10 лет назад
Alors t'es une conne, qui non contente de voir les Anglo-saxon(Anglais, Américain, Canadien et Australien) cracher sur notre pays et sur notre peuple, en rajoute une couche. Pourquoi je vois jamais des commentaire comme ceci sur les accents des anglais qui parle français ? C'est marrant, cette permanente scarification des Français envers eux même et leur concitoyens.
@fvveb2141
@fvveb2141 10 лет назад
Ahahahah ton commentaire me fait rire. Le Français a peut être été, 200 ans plus tôt, la langue privilégiée des élites internationales mais aujourd'hui la langue la plus couramment parlée dans le monde est l'anglais. Les Français ne font aucun effort pour apprendre cette langue ou, du moins, améliorer leur accent, s'accrochant à leur culture vielllie et anti-libérale franco-française. Les Anglo Saxons parlent peut être mal le Français mais cet "handicap" (et je mets des guillemets car ce n'en est pas un) ne les empêchera pas de faire carrière, de voyager partout dans le monde, etc. Alors que le contraire serait désolant, on le voit bien avec les présidents Français qui se ridiculisent avec leur Anglais de niveau primaire.
@mkmc94
@mkmc94 10 лет назад
Alors non seulement l'anglais n'est pas la langue la plus couramment parlée dans le monde mais en plus elle décline fortement contrairement aux français (qui sois dit en passant, comptera 750 millions de locuteur en 250), car tout les pays anglo-saxon sont en déclin tandis que les pays orientaux sont en essor. Je répète, les anglo-américain ne parle qu'une langue et donc sont les seul qui fournissent aucun effort pour parler des langues étrangère. Et je peux t'assurer que dans une contrat avec l'Allemagne entre le gars qui parlent allemands et le gars qui parle anglais, on choisiras celui qui parle l'allemand et c'est valable dans tout les pays; ça change juste tout. Ne pas parler anglais ne t'empêche pas de faire une carrière, je tiens a te signalé que la quasi totalité du monde ne parle pas l'Anglais et ça les empêche pas de vivre; le monde c'est pas l'Europe et les États-unis hein ! La critique sur la position de la france vis à vis du néo-libéralisme; je te conseil de regarder l'écart des richesse aux États-unis et te conseil le livre de Thomas Piketty car tu n'as pas l'air de savoir les effets de ctte politique qui est non seulement inefficace mais va tous nous conduire aux désastre dans quelque année (je t'en renvois à Philippe Béchade, Pierre Sabatier, Olivier Delamarche, Olivier Berruyer) même Attali à les jetons. Quand à l'accent..pfff...que dire franchement ? Aller bisous sur les fesses.
Далее
Камень, ножницы, нейронка
00:33
Просмотров 110 тыс.
ЗАМУРОВАННЫЙ ФОКУСНИК
00:44
Просмотров 47 тыс.
How The Economic Machine Works by Ray Dalio
31:00
Просмотров 39 млн
What Creates Consciousness?
45:45
Просмотров 109 тыс.
Thomas Piketty: 'Tax the super rich at 80 per cent'!
8:46
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20