Caroline Criado Perez on Invisible Women 

Feminism is in fact about man hating. It has always existed since the beginning of feminism. I urge you to check out the declaration of sentiment in 1848. Besides, Caroline is not a reasonable person herself either, she accuses any women who criticize her suffering from internalized misogyny. She even attacked white men just simply because they're white.

25 year old male from Australia here too! It's a great book and also echo your sentiments about how many men are closed minded to hearing about this stuff (including me when I was 20), so it's awesome to hear how willing you are to challenge those narratives at a young age!

Was it hard handing in your man card to believe this absolute drivel?! Effeminate males are bad people, stop it.

@@GingerJesusSaves awww, u upset?

@@NuttyNeil76 awww, you a big girls blouse!

Ask ladies for feedback how to create vehicles for them?

Empathy over bathrooms and car seats? Does this woman think she is disabled? She deserves NO sympathy..people who actually struggle in life deserve sympathy not this lunatic.

@nono meme No one has the right to demand anything from anyone else. If women are being underserved by products that exist, why don't women take advantage of this market opportunity to create a product that's better for women? The implicit assumption seems to be that only men can solve these problems, and that it's the responsibility of men to eliminate any and all inconveniences that women face. This is a silly and myopic perspective that can only arise from an incredible position of privilege.

@nono meme Yes, because stomping your feet and throwing a tantrum is a better idea than actually buckling down and solving problems. The entire problem with the privileged & entitled perspective, summarized.

@@xthesayuri5756 No, what that means is that the male default is incredibly ingrained in our society to the point that not even women notice. I didn't notice it when I was a kid, but by my teenage years I definitely started to.

@@xthesayuri5756 Literally no one believes it's on purpose to hurt women. Remember, we're talking about defaults here. You did not notice women as default because women are never default. Whatever things men are affected by is completely irrelevant. The topic is default sex, and the default male IS sexist.

Well said!

I wonder if you don't agree that they are problems because they are not a problem for *you* - as a male? I'm not being inflammatory, just posing a sincere question. Some things don't seem like a big deal until we have to deal with them personally - like how awful pavements are for buggies - especially double-buggies when you have twins. Or being in a wheelchair and how you feel you're in everyone's way, and also get ignored at the same time. It's the old adage, I think - when we know better, we do better...

Feminist like you always use extreme cases to make a point

I'm not a small woman, I don't have problems with cellphones, or sitting on a car tho.

You- ryaniles??. Suck it up lady, you are supposed to be equal and boss babes and independent. Deal with.

🙏❤️

what a bullshit idea.

@@redbeard2330 hi insignificant being. I do what I want. Have a nice evening.

@@AnaDMTL hi ugly fat depressed feminist who cant improuve herself this video from the god of psyco modern is for you ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aMcjxSThD54.html

@@redbeard2330 look at chu bubba! must be a trump supporter, with this little made up account, spreading hate. I'm not wasting my time anymore with chu bubba. say byeeee, byeeeee!!

Oh stfu

So tell me how many toilets would be enough to dispel the notion of male bias?

But why 'progress'? Why not equitable design in the first place?

Smartphone sizes have been increasing over time. So yeah it's bs

I think we may be confusing two issues. 1) just because something is bigger doesn't mean it is sexist or designed to favor male gender. The same way something that is smaller isn't sexist or designed to favor female gender. There are other factors that influence size like screen resolution and visual display. 2) just like car companies "should" use both male and female crash test dummies, phone companies "should" use both male and female hand size models when determining cell phone button layout and size for thumbs and finger interfaces.

@@Justuas phones have been increasing in size because we use them constantly, like reading books, technical information etc. Not because it fits better in a man's hand....

LMAOOOooo

would you be interested giving feedback how to design vehicle for ladies?

Because it’s bs mate! Apparently women only do the groceries! smh! This is some next level privilege right here!

@@bugsy742 I can't even tell whether you're trolling or not... Keep calm and go read a book lmao

@@RhythmAddictedState go read a book - the insinuation that I must obviously lack any form of intelligence, I should of placed a bet on your reply! 🤦🏻‍♂️😆

It’s been proven that she has cherry picked the data to suit her story. Also she has been caught lying on a number of occasions (actually even has an award for it). The woman is not credible I’m afraid and neither is the book.

@@justinbarber4567 he doesn’t care mate he’s too busy simping!

I think she mentions it a bit in the video that they are not hating men or suggesting malign dealings. But rather that due to the fact that men are more likely to be in engineering and design positions of power that they sometimes neglect fundamental differences between men and women. This leads to them inadvertently designing for themselves because they forgot to consider women's differences in physiology and behaviour (innate or because of societal roles). It helps no one if men feel personally attacked, it is merely bringing to attention the fact that women differ and that those differences are rarely taken into account, inconveniencing women.

@@zwergstein2152 reading this is confusing

lol she's a member of the super rich, not middle class. she knows true suffering and omg we need wimmens on bank notes. lmao forget about actual enslaved women. we need more women in high paying media and technical jobs despite their qualifications. " she is the daughter of Carlos Criado-Perez, an Argentinian-born businessman and who rose to be CEO of the Safeway supermarket chain in the UK "

Because dying in a car crash is a minor inconvenience.

@Alina Krichevsky The point being made is that in a crash of the same severity that a woman is more likely to be seriously injured or die than a man because of the design of the car and the safety features. I really do not understand all the hate from men in these comments. What is wrong with making the world safer and more convenient for everyone? No one is suggesting making anything worse for men.

@@Ukulele-allsorts Women are significantly more likely to be seriously injured or die in a car accident because women are smaller, have weaker skeletal structure, and are less capable of surviving serious trauma. This is a biological fact caused by sexual dimorphism. The claim that women are more likely to be injured because of some features that work better for men as opposed to women doesn't actually have any evidence to support it.

You realize the point is that they are overlooked, and it's systematic. If you were systematically overlooked you'd also complain. Just like you complain about a book that describes problems that you can't relate to, rather than just seeing them as very fixable problems that nobody has bothered to adress, because the people making those decisions have been male. You can argue all day what to do about that, but it does seem reasonable to at least be aware of the problems women face and fix them if they are problems yeah?

You haven't even read it.

​@@florzinnha oh the irony

Randy Bentwick I don’t even know where to begin with this blatant ignorance.

@@alicee6180 try..

Randy Bentwick it would clearly be wasted on you. Just go read the book.

"Women could have but they were too busy complaining" Or maybe it's because they were oppressed and forbidden from being educated for centuries you half-wit. Please read a history book.

Then buy a smaller one, like I did. Hardly rocket science.

In a way yes and in a way no, but still there needs to be a vehicle for ladies!

Absolutely...not

The problem is, you just did exactly what you are blaming her of, adressing only the male side. While these issues need adressing, she should have a fourm for her problems as well. You can't have every book adress both sides for everything, sometimes it's enough to point a light at sides nobody has considered right?

@@pbldiaz28 I am asking her to merge both together bc in statistical analysis, you cannot be blind to all factors. She pointed out all the issues for females and I pointed out issues for males. So both need to be combined into a single forum and addressed by someone that can target a large audience. I am also not publishing books to a mass audience. If her book is about statistics, its biased and reaching a broad audience, unlike my comment.

@@JFabree you realize those books exist, it isn't this one. She spent several hundred pages on just females, and was moving rather briskly at that, allowing her sources to speak for themselves. It's perfectly fine for her to publish a book like that, just like there a books with male only perspectives. Most books throughout history have male only perspectives and nobody was like 'what about the women!?' but now that things change just a bit you are freaking out ...

@@JFabree The bad statistical practice of not mentioning the other side would only be the case if she used absolute numbers. But, at least in the video, most statistics were expressed as a percentage of the occurrence in men. Your comment could at most be that her showing only one side of the argument creating an overly negative frame and that the narrative structure is bad faith (I disagree with that but @Pablo D has mentioned already). So I don't see any statistical malpractice as you are suggesting.

Yeah why do they never want to help women in Islamic families?

@@chattingesque372 because they don’t care mate, full of 💩 people like this!

Perfectly said.

i thought this was a book about women over 30.

Leftist bullshit is what it is.

@@harrisonchang3135 because concerns of litterally half of the population are bullshit, right? You seem like an excellent candidate for this book

@@DiankaK507 Imagine being so deluded into thinking that 50% of the nation believes in this preposterous nonsense.

@@ch1oee_0702 😂😂

Shut up, Neville. Your wife is telling you the same every day.

My other half found her bs insulting. And the toilet thing is so stupid, men need to shit and we can’t do that in a urinal

She has citations for all of the statistics in the book

She cited everything in her book.

It’s valuable to consolidate this information for current and future designers and engineers

Feminists are easier to plunder than Engineers, and she knows it.

I believe this data is recorded by governmental and private pollsters. Reported in this case means officially as a crime, so the sample would have, when asked in a poll, said they were sexually assaulted. Of those who said they were only 10% went to the police.

@@zwergstein2152 So you can just say that it happened to me and they will believe me? And you want me to take it seriously?

why don‘t you read the book and question your way of thinking before you dismiss it?

A women is someone who identifies as one.

@@katherinerex9067 Yeah but as one "what"? Thats like answering "What is a tree?" with: "It's a tree".

ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜɪs ɪs ᴡʜʏ ᴀʟʟ ᴍᴀʟᴇs sʜᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ᴀʙᴏʀᴛᴇᴅ ᴏʀ ᴅʀᴏᴡɴᴇᴅ ᴀᴛ ʙɪʀᴛʜ. ᴘᴇsᴛ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴏʟ.

Camille Paglia? ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴘᴀᴛʜᴇᴛɪᴄ ᴄᴜɴᴛ needs ᴀ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ᴋɪᴄᴋ ɪɴ ʜᴇʀ face. ᴍᴀʏʙᴇ that ᴡᴀʏ sʜᴇ ᴡould ʟᴇᴀʀɴ sᴏᴍᴇ self respect ᴀɴᴅ sᴛᴏᴘ to ᴘᴀɴᴅᴇʀ to ᴀɴᴛɪ ғᴇᴍɪɴɪsᴛs and ᴍɪsᴏɢʏɴɪsᴛs ɪɴ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟ.

@@florzinnha No I think Ms. Paglia has a good sense of intersectionality via standpoint epistemology . You're just a triggered bitch. =^D

Wojak Woes You’re right, we have it so great in a whole world designed by white men for white men. Maybe we should just give up fighting for equality and safety and carry on getting injured or even dying or being murdered in this mad shit of a world, because those white men haven’t realised that when they say gender neutral they actually mean male...! Gosh I’m so glad to be the ‘atypical’ gender, we’ve got it sooooo good. Have you even read the book?

@@alicee6180 lol or try designing something instead of whinging. ask gazillionaires like the """author""" of the book in question to fund your lady-only inventions. that would be true progress. i bet you'll just keep complaining and ask a man, though. **yawn**

Huh?

@Everybody Nobody I'm neither sexist nor patronising this is woefully poor research simple as that. What the author has done is to fall into the standard feminist trap. The woman she is describing as having all these issues is a woman from the 1970's this then allows her to hammer home a false message about bias where this is none. It's a standard feminist technique so ingrained in feminist theory that most don't even see it anymore and I'm including men in that. You choose the clothes you wear but it's men's fault that there aren't enough toilets...seriously? You're only 5'4" but it's men's fault you have to sit too far forward in the car, - I've been laughing at that one for weeks, I've a male friend who is 5'2" he's clearly doomed...no wait he's never been in an accident, what a sexist bigot he is. What feminists have done is to create a world where women are always victims even when they are not; a world where every issue must be drawn back to the world functioning in a malecentric way therefore excluding women. It's a tired and outdated cliche and has little if any baring on the real world. Are there no women engineers? Or are there no female architects or car designers? Do you really think that multi-million dollar industries have not stopped to think about 'women's issues'? Laughable. And your only recourse when faced with a perfectly valid academic observation is to play the 'sexist patronising' card, staggering, just staggering.

​@Everybody Nobody Oh dear talk about drawing the world to suit your own pampered little ego. The corporates as you are referring to them have been watching, learning and milking the female dollar for decades, there really is no conspiracy, although you might need to take your feminist glasses off to see that. My small friend as you call him is not singular but stands for the tens of thousands, millions probably of people with short legs, short bodies, short arms overweight and so on who somehow, despite your protests, manage to drive a car. If we follow her logic any driver not built like a crash test dummy is in trouble but that's not the case. You do the research you're the one with the problem. It would be financially ruinous to design cars to come in a size 8*, 12* 14* 16* (*delete as appropriate) not least because you'd all buy the size smaller than you actually are and kid yourself 'Ford always do big sizes, I'm actually a 14 in a Nissan'. Okay that WAS sexist but I couldn't resist. That said however there really is nothing to stop you designing femalecentric car seats and pedal boxes/airbags as after market add ons, If Perez is right you'd make a killing. Craido-Perez used clothing as an issue not me so you need to take that up with her, not me but whilst we're here are you elderly or disabled? You're more likely to be apparently, who knew? I am though, a fully functioning adult who understands how the world works, so look at that, something we agree on. I can also assure you I am not in the slightest bit 'triggered' no one hates me either, I'm adorable. My central point stands: feminists draw their women as 1960's/70's stereotypes to ensure they are victims today. For this I was branded a sexist patronising parody of sexist patronising men in your first post so who was triggered? I'm not at all, as a father of two girls, opposed to feminism quite the contrary I simply think Perez isn't being honest and it's poor research. I didn't say she didn't have point but you were too busy being triggered to notice. Have I said 'triggered' enough? Anyway time has moved on you should too.

Man tells woman that she's wrong about life as a woman.

@@user-yw3qo8cn2h feminists have been telling men they are wrong about being men for decades, in fact that is the foundational principle of feminism so right back at ya.

WOW, I have NO idea why you would write something so ignorant. Are you horribly bored? It has been problem for a very long time. Sexual violence has been going on historically for a very long time. Your disrespect for such important subjects like public safety is very sad. Perhaps your definition of "dribble" is part of the problem here?

@@nadiaramoutar4492 Equality comes with a price. Can't think of one freedom I have you don't. But, if the world is that hazardous for you, then we need to go back and make women a protected class, guilty of nothing, but wronged at every turn. Men will be your only protection.

@Everybody Nobody what in the hell are you talking about? I've worn PPE on the Slope, and have worked with women wearing the same. And this was PPE for radiation exposure, and hazardous chemical no-go. I've never heard anything you are referring to. As I said, if it's too dangerous, men will take care of it. But from what I see, and have heard, there is no complaint about sexist PPE. Lack of; yes. Sexist; no. And PPE comes in any number of sizes.

@@nadiaramoutar4492 Blah, blah. Violence has been going on a long time. And the HUGE majority of it, almost all, was perpetrated on men. Public safety is a myth, you will never be safe in public. So yes; dribble.

@Everybody Nobody Blah, Blah. Is there anything that a women can't find fault with? Air conditioning, Bathrooms. Know you've probably never worn full PPE, and if you have, your "lizard grain" would have found out, as I have, that full PPE isn't a designer dress. It's damn uncomfortable; for both sexes! And I stand by it. If it's too dangerous, call a man. I think that's what that load of offal you just wrote was intended to mean. Could be wrong; too many interpretations.

Women are literally dying due to such inequality and you think it's scraping the barrel?

Haha sogar deutsche hier. Das Klo Argument macht mit ihrer Argumentation ein wenig mehr Sinn tho. Der Rest ist trotzdem Schwachsinn