Тёмный

Celibacy, Easy or Frightening? 

Hillside Hermitage
Подписаться 12 тыс.
Просмотров 4,3 тыс.
50% 1

- What's next after being celibate?
- Does sensuality diminish with old age?
____________________________________
If you wish to support the monks of the Hillside Hermitage Sangha and this channel you are very welcome to do so via:
www.hillsidehe...
____________________________________
AUDIO FILES AND TRANSCRIPTS OF OUR RU-vid DHAMMA TALKS
t.me/HillsideH...
____________________________________
MORE TEACHINGS:
www.hillsidehe...

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 33   
@veroreyes3826
@veroreyes3826 Год назад
This dhamma talk is very helpful to me, I am practicing celibacy since 5 years ago to reduce sensual desires. Thank you Ajahn 🙏☸️
@AlexKellyArtUK
@AlexKellyArtUK Год назад
For one who delights in sensuality, celibacy is frightening, a prison, a deprivation. For the one who has seen the dangers of sensuality and the cause by which it binds, then skilfully cutting through and attaining a pleasure not of the flesh or something higher they go freely in the world: unbound.
@HillsideHermitage
@HillsideHermitage Год назад
The story of the old nun somewhat inaccurate and is from the commentaries. Her verses appear in Therigatha 5.8 - Soṇātherīgāthā: Then the other Bhikkhunis Left me alone in the convent. They had given me instructions To boil a cauldron of water. Having fetched the water I poured it into the cauldron. I put the cauldron on the stove and sat, Then my mind became composed. I saw the aggregates as impermanent, I saw them as suffering and not self. Having expelled all cankers from my heart, Right there I attained Arahanthship.” Commentarial addition: "She practised meditation with urgency, often passing the entire night in sitting and walking meditation. So as not to disturb others, she started to meditate in the lower hall at night in the dark by guiding herself with the pillars. Before long her determination and effort resulted in Sona attaining Arahanthship." ____________________________________ If you wish to support the monks of the Hillside Hermitage Sangha and this channel you are very welcome to do so via: www.hillsidehermitage.org/support-us ____________________________________ AUDIO FILES AND TRANSCRIPTS OF OUR RU-vid DHAMMA TALKS t.me/HillsideHermitage ____________________________________ MORE TEACHINGS: www.hillsidehermitage.org/teachings
@ThaniyoBhikkhu
@ThaniyoBhikkhu Год назад
Verses of the Elder Bhikkhunīs Chapter of the Fives Verses of the Elder Soṇā “I gave birth to ten children from this same body.Then when I was old and feeble, I approached a bhikkhunī. She taught me the Dhamma:the aggregates, elements, and sense domains. After I listened to her Dhamma, I cut off my hair and went forth. From training with her, my divine eye was purified.I know my past lives, where I dwelt previously. Cultivating the signlessness with a well-collected and elevated mind. Released from the in between, cooled by non-assumption. The five aggregatess are fully understood, they remain with roots destroyed. What does it matter that I am decrepit? There is now no coming back to any state of being.” The Elder Soṇā
@noonespecial4171
@noonespecial4171 Год назад
I'm married and celibate, completely, 8 years, no problem, I just accepted the way it is, nature. At first I had thoughts of I was dying or missing out on life etc etc so you need to go through a grieving as its the human experience, nature, now awareness of it comes then I see mind thinking I need to do something about it, the Vedana, then I smile and let go. Its bhava tanha, desire to become.
@andreypashinsky2335
@andreypashinsky2335 Год назад
But how does your spouse feel about you being celibate?
@albert_web916
@albert_web916 Год назад
Then why are you still married? Celibacy, as explained in the suttas, is not only related to the sexual act but any form of sensual contact with, for example, your wife.
@AlexKellyArtUK
@AlexKellyArtUK Год назад
There is celibacy in body and celibacy in mind. ‘Enforced’ celibacy in a marriage is common I suspect, which invariably leads to infidelity in many who do not keep the five precepts. For someone who lives by the precepts they are in a difficult situation because even though there may be celibate in body, celibacy in mind does not automatically follow. Still, if they have the confidence in the Dhamma and train the mind they can cut through and be free in mind too. There is the case of two married lay followers in the suttas who both anagami, one was celibate and one was not, so celibacy is not always obstacle to gaining the Dhamma eye.
@Attackatyourownrisk
@Attackatyourownrisk Год назад
It’s easy. Especially when you’ve been practicing this for years. And it’s especially easy when you did not have much physical activity when you were not on this journey. I also feel if you are not celibate or just getting into the journey, do not look for someone who has been on this journey for years.
@hariharry391
@hariharry391 6 месяцев назад
🙏
@bkhpanigha
@bkhpanigha Год назад
When it comes to abandoning comforts that one is attached to, is there a way to draw a line? Keeping in mind that what constitutes an attachment (apart from things outlined by precepts of course) can only be known through self-honesty and not through a blanket standard for all people, there are things that one knows would cause mental/existential rather than purely bodily discomfort to go without, i.e. one is attached to them, and yet they would provide an only relative rather than indispensable practical benefit, unlike eating. A random example would be having a dwelling that is well sheltered from the elements, while knowing that one would be emotionally bothered by the lack of such protection. Would one be in some way slowing down one's practice and making a compromise by not renouncing such dependencies, having discerned that they are genuinely there, rather than just blindly adopting an external standard of what "must be done by a serious practitioner"? Where would the line be, if there is any?
@HillsideHermitage
@HillsideHermitage Год назад
One first needs to be able to overcome the emotional bother caused by the thoughts of losing one's comfort. Once that is addressed, then that person can forsake their pleasant dwelling every now and then and see if an actual exposure to (non-life threatening) elements induces more of emotional discomforts.
@cajuputoil3468
@cajuputoil3468 Год назад
Where is Timmy boy? He doing good? 🙏🏻🙇
@user-tx5zl1ub7p
@user-tx5zl1ub7p Год назад
Dear sir, thank you for the instruction as we continue to follow them. I have a quick question, when I am in a secluded area, the thought that I am missing out on the opportunity of sexuality and opportunity of money and success, those are also the symptoms of not wanting pain?
@HillsideHermitage
@HillsideHermitage Год назад
They are symptoms of the fear of missing out on things that your mind still values. Which, of course, boils down to not wanting the pain of it.
@j.m.kocsis2557
@j.m.kocsis2557 Год назад
Thank you, Venerable Sirs
@samuelcharles7642
@samuelcharles7642 Год назад
Good video
@sahassaransi_mw
@sahassaransi_mw Год назад
Theruwansaranai Bhante, this question is not directly related to the content of the video, I hope you dont mind 😀 Bhante, in response to one of my previous questions on what is meant by sense restraint, you explained it as clarity in regards to your intentions, and not of acting out on lustful intentions to go after sense objects. However, in the suttas it seems that sense restraint is usually described as (using the eye as an example), " HAVING SEEN a form with the eye, a bhikkhu does not grasp its signs and features." This seems to imply non grasping AFTER having interacted with a sense object, rather than restraining and forseeing at the mental level of intentions, BEFORE going after a sense object? Thank you bhante !
@HillsideHermitage
@HillsideHermitage Год назад
No, that simply means that no matter how restrained you are, you are bound to SEE (smell, taste...) unsuitable things for as long as the sense organs are there. Having seen them you don't settle in their sign of beauty or repulsive, etc. So, sense restraint stretches from not looking at something that you KNOW is unsuitable even before you looked at it, and if despite that it is still seen, then don't grasp its features. Otherwise, one might end up thinking it's ok to look at things that are unsuitable as long as one "doesn't grasp its features".
@andreyderevyanko4686
@andreyderevyanko4686 Год назад
Thank you so much for the wisdom. One thing I would like to recommend - the AI Generated Video thumbnails are quite creepy looking. if you are using DALL-E to generate them, perhaps another service may be better, like Midjourney or similar - they look a lot friendlier:) Many thanks
@kassapas189
@kassapas189 Год назад
sinhala subtitles daganna vidiyak nadda
@atozdhamma4248
@atozdhamma4248 Год назад
Dear Ajhan Can you please describe your vision on what Buddha's revealing of 'BAWA'? My understanding is that feeling of a being is BAWA. If one can live without feeling a being, that is BAWA NIRODHA Nirwana. Until that total freedom we still can guide our lives towards Nirwana. Please discuss, thank you.
@sahassaransi_mw
@sahassaransi_mw Год назад
Theruwansaranai Bhante! Bhante you mentioned "dont give rise to thoughts of ill will and harm". I've been wondering this for a while, especially with starting to try and sit down and endure what ever is present in my experience: Could there be two categories of thought; namely, thought that arises on its own and thoughts you purposely give rise to? There seem to be some thoughts that come at you even if you dont necessarily want to think them, and then there are thoughts I actively think. If so, Would there be a difference of responsibility in regards to these two kinds? If i remember correctly, in a certain video in which someone is troubled by thoughts, you advised them to endure it (since you only want to get away from the pain of a thought through trying to stop thinking), whereas in a comment where someone mentions continuosly being just drowned in and dragged around by their thoughts while trying to endure, you advise them that it is ok to walk back and forth to reduce it (if I remember correctly). I was wondering if that is bc of a difference of attitude in regards to intentional versus non intentional thought? Thank you bhante
@HillsideHermitage
@HillsideHermitage Год назад
I wouldn't say two "categories", but more like two "levels". Thoughts manifest on their own, you find them already there first, so to speak. But then you can choose to welcome them further, delight in them, proliferate them (i.e. think them even further, having taken them for granted). Or choose to deny them, stop them, distract oneself from them, if they are unpleasant. Either way, more thoughts are result of an arisen thought. The more often you do that, the more often will such thoughts present themselves on their own. So the responsibility remains the same: do not take them for granted, do not welcome them, delight in them, or deny them and distract oneself from them if they are painful.
@sahassaransi_mw
@sahassaransi_mw Год назад
@@HillsideHermitage @HillsideHermitage thank you for this insightful response Bhante ! I am guessing this not entertaining and not rejecting of an already manifest thought would only pertain to arisen thoughts connected with ill will and desire? Because without acceptance and welcoming and proliferating of thought, how would there be contemplation? Or perhaps, should only manifest thought already wholesome in nature be contemplated and pondered upon?
@VeritableVagabond
@VeritableVagabond Год назад
Honestly, F celibacy. Women are miraculous.
@rohanofelvenpower5566
@rohanofelvenpower5566 Год назад
that is true; from a corporeal point of view. And to admit this view requires having a body. Saying this does not minimize it. For as long as you rely on a body to exists, it is alright to pertain in the business neccesary to that body and its world. Ignoring your body is fucking day dreaming with your eyes wide open in daytime. The real problem however, comes when your body and its fleshly feeling become miraculous. When you start to put other business aside for the sake obtaining fleshly sensations. Then sir, you are no longer fucking but you are really being fucked. For you are not fully just this body.
@Hunbatz95
@Hunbatz95 Год назад
Not for authentic Buddhists tho
@googleuser9624
@googleuser9624 Год назад
Just because they are nice doesn't change the fact that attachment and clinging are pain.
@johnanderson6946
@johnanderson6946 Год назад
no they aint
@AlexKellyArtUK
@AlexKellyArtUK Год назад
Look a bit deeper, just below the skin, it’s only miraculous that there is lust for such. There is amusing story about a monk who feels desire for a village girl so he goes to see if her excrement is a desirable thing, after all it’s part her too. If you took away the pleasant feeling which is based on contact, would the the separate parts of any body still be desirable?
Далее
Seeing Through the Hindrances Instead of Denying Them
26:27
Relinquishing the Entire World
28:27
Просмотров 4,2 тыс.
Bearwolf - GODZILLA Пародия Beatrise
00:33
Просмотров 380 тыс.
What's Up With Buddhist Celibacy?
27:41
Просмотров 21 тыс.
Discerning the Body for Uprooting of Sensuality
14:27
life of the forest monk
4:51
Просмотров 55 тыс.
Unwholesomeness of Relationships
26:29
Просмотров 7 тыс.
Life Is So Much Sweeter On Celibacy
7:07
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Ask A Monk: Celibacy
7:35
Просмотров 94 тыс.
Help Parents or Ordain?
11:24
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.
Suffering of Sotapannas
41:52
Просмотров 6 тыс.
Bearwolf - GODZILLA Пародия Beatrise
00:33
Просмотров 380 тыс.