Century M100 Heavy Lifting! 

Yeah their technology is a game changer. Like when the whole turret rips off the truck and topples over

Not likely at all. When this equipment is used correctly and within it's limits it makes these picks easily. No turrets coming off these trucks.

@@lisajohnson8566 clearly you don’t know what your talking about. Company’s have literally ripped turrets off of these trucks. They aren’t the best or strongest for recoveries.

OK. 😂

@@lisajohnson8566 you can be uneducated. It’s okay for you to

@SSS Dias anything at anytime can fail not just the straps,end of thr day its a machine things break

Yep, can also tow 120K pounds as well, this thing is a MONSTER!

They have a video of them testing the m100 before launch and I believe they got a load cell to read out 200,000 and some change before they maxed out the load cell on a lift.

@@towtruckaj agreed, but they seemed hesitant to put more counterweight behind that 1150 rotator. If it's a 100-ton rotator, one would hope that whatever rating system they use has at least a glimmer of a chance of a real world capacity.

@@pjtemplin couldn't put more counter weights because it would max out the under lift capacity.

And the 100 ton rating is straight off the tailboard all the way in

Each tow job costs a little over 1000$ Do 5,10 of those a week the truck pays for itself after a couple of years. This truck can do the work of 3 tow trucks

Err NRC

The military has the hemmet..

@@BAMCIS13450703 41

They did for the unveil had it allset till a high up said no

Might the M100 be available with a sleeper cab?

Hm, that's why I keep thinking, not that there aren't times having a 'tator is required rather than overkill, but there's also times where it makes more sense to use a proper mobile crane than to use a rotator. Often I see some of these used and, I think, "Hang on, because you need to use your two winches, you can't rotate the load, relative to the boom, only to the rotator truck (aka a slew). The only benefit a rotator has over a mobile crane, when you remove the tow capability (apparently, an 'optional extra') is storage cubbies. the benefit of a mobile crane over a rotator then became, reach, height, variable capacity through the hook, you dont need to freespool and pull the winch line out yourself, which if you need to double back or triple or quadruple it for extra capacity (at the cost of speed), on a 'tator, turns into more of a back-breaker than the job already is. And on a mobile crane, there is (usually) a cab to stay warm in :D Came here after watching a vid on Liebherr's channel for the G-BKF that makes me slightly surprised they haven't already gotten into the 'tator' market.

Insana’s does my company’s towing. They had this truck built for a specific task and they said it does it well. I think it’s for lifting natural gas compressors on remote job sites.

Why a nail gun? We used to use hammers

Here in Ft.Worth these days, if its a BIG BIG, the CVE will request a tator and if you don’t have one they’ll keep going down the rotation list to the next company that does.

@Gary Shephard Why did u guys go with Century over JerrDan

Moto 223 Myself personally I didn’t have anything to do with The specs of the truck That was left up to my former boss and she is a beast

Moto 223 When I get back to work I’m off for two weeks I’ll send you a picture

@@moto223 Jerr Dan has its weaknesses in heavy duty, I like there flatbeds that’s it

@@mikeford675 not really when u go from millers 70 ton to jerr dans 60 ton it only beats it from tail light to tail light which if its a rotator that is kinda useless.

Ron wants one

1.2 million dollars

Somewhere between $1-2 million afaik

WOW the Video kept getting even crazier