JOHN 19:15 KING JAMES VERSION "BUT THEY CRIED OUT, AWAY WITH HIM, AWAY WITH HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, SHALL I CRUCIFY YOUR KING? THE CHIEF PRIESTS ANSWERED, WE HAVE NO KING BUT CAESAR!"
@ruth4019, the book of John is the most vile & Anti-Semitic book in the whole Bible. Clearly, we should take such silly words that it says about the Jews to be true, right? Heck, no. John also has the Jews unable to correct Jesus when he constantly misquotes scripture. As Jesus said to Pilate, "Thou sayest."
@@ruth4019: You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins. NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God! PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
I have The Stone Edition Chumash from Art Scroll and also Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan The Living Torah. Also The Koren Jerusalem Bible compiled by Eliyahu Koren...the whole Tenak Torah, Prophets, Psalms, Proverbs, Shir Shirim, Magelas, etc. small print but it was my daughter's book. 47:27
JOHN 19:15 KING JAMES VERSION "BUT THEY CRIED OUT, AWAY WITH HIM, AWAY WITH HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, SHALL I CRUCIFY YOUR KING? THE CHIEF PRIESTS ANSWERED, WE HAVE NO KING BUT CAESAR!"
Dear Rabbi Federow, As a professional sound engineer, I need to tell you that your microphone settings are very shrill. There’s a harsh whistling sound when you say words containing an S. Perhaps you can adjust it and make it more listenable for those of us with sensitive hearing. Thank you in advance.
The book under discussion here was written by Joseph Atwill, and the main thesis is NOT a support for Christianity at all, which is the point of view of the misinformation being repeated by the guest. The main thesis is that the Romans created Christian religion and that the characters in the gospels are fictional. Even when real people are mentioned in the gospels, they are not mentioned accurately, because the gospels are an intentionally created polemic against the Jewish faith. The guest thinks that the book is an apology for Christian doctrine, where it is doubting the veracity of the Christian faith. This interview should be deleted from your library for misleading your audience.
I think you misunderstood the rabbi, he did not comment on whether Ceaser's Messiah theory is valid or not, he was talking specifically about a quote which they mightve mispoke on in the documentary.
@@ts8960 - The Roman emperor and his advisors most certainly did want to eradicate Jewish history, and they may have ordered all the scrolls to be burnt, but that does not mean that there were no surviving Torah scrolls. The sectarian messianic sects lived outside of the province in remote caves. This is nothing about the main idea of the book. If he understood that the book invites the question of Christianity being a new invention, and that it questions the very idea of a historical Jesus, then he would embrace it. But he is unfortunately to much of a politician who worries about what his Christian neighbors might think than with what he calls 'conjecture.' Complacent folks are waiting for the messiah, but they do not suspect that the messiah is rather waiting for us Jews to do something.
@72Yonatan you're right. All jews agree that christianity is a fabricated religion. Its time they unite and support the best theory for who created it (the roman government). And the talmud also agrees with this, the sages switched around all the dates and created metaphors for jesus, in order to create a riddle. When putting the puzzle pieces together the sages were covertly saying that jesus was titus Flavius. Scholarly paper on this written by Michael Menasgotz
Judaism in a Non Gnostic Religion. There is only one power that exists, there is only one creation, and there is only one creator. Nothing exists; which has not been touched by G-d. Sin is a mistreatment, abuse of, and disrespect towards that which G-d created. Thoughts as Sin is a product of all Gnostic Religions, for it is based upon the notion of these thoughts being derived from a place where G-d does not exist. Gnostism is dualist.... A place of G-d existance and a place of non existance of G-d. A pure perfect place that G-d can touch and a non pure and non perfect place; which G-d does not touch. Gnostic Religions are: Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Zoroastrianism are generally speaking Gnostic Religions. If the goal is to go beyound the physical / material or excape from it.... The Cosmology is Gnostic. I reject the Gnostic New Age Beliefs of my parents and I reject the Gnostic Christian beliefs of my friends whom I grew up with. Gnostic Relgions tend to reject: real science, the study of history, a wide appriciation of art, and rational thought.
There are few Tanakh I use for translations from Hebrew to EnglishJPS Jewish Publication Society, Stone Edition, Koren, and The Israel Bible by Tuly Weisz.
JOHN 19:15 KING JAMES VERSION "BUT THEY CRIED OUT, AWAY WITH HIM, AWAY WITH HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, SHALL I CRUCIFY YOUR KING? THE CHIEF PRIESTS ANSWERED, WE HAVE NO KING BUT CAESAR!"
The red letter words will change your life. Don't be distracted by church doctrines and/or the arguments against church doctrines. Go directly to the red letter words and read them for yourself.
This person posted the same thing on Rabbi Singer’s channel. I agree! If you read the “red letter” parts of the nt, it is easy to see how much Jesus taught contrary to the Torah! ✡️❤️
@@AdaraBalabusta: Yes, exactly right!! What Christians refuse to acknowledge, is that MANY of us here are FORMER Christians of various denominations who know ALL ABOUT the "red letters"!!
Regarding Jesus as the Messiah (died ca. 30 AD). A couple of questions.... 1. Do the Jews adhere to the idea that this "Age" of the world lasts for 7,000 years based on the 7-day creation template? 6000 years of man's lease on earth followed by a 1000-year Millennial Sabbath? 2. Can it be agreed that the 1000-year Millennial Sabbath is the same as the Messianic Kingdom era? 3. Can it be agreed that Jews of the 1st Century would have acknowledged that the Messiah would not come until the end of the 6000 years? Or to usher in the Messianic Kingdom era? 4. Can it be agreed that in Judaism, that there will be 2 main Messiahs? Messiah b. Joseph and the Messiah b. David? If....you agree with all of those statements....then; 1. Why would the Jews expect the Messiah(s), or at least the M. b. David) to come during the 1st Century AD? They wouldn't. have. They would not expect the M. b. David to appear for another 2000 years. 2. Jesus and the 12 Nazarene Apostles knew Jewish eschatology. They knew that the events of the M. b. David would not occur for another 2000 years. So, to expect that Jesus was going to fulfill the Messianic expectations of b. David at the 1st Century, it wasn't going to happen. Jesus and the Apostles knew that. It's promotion was purely Paulinist initiated to deflect from the real Nazarene Jesus, the rabbinics just took the Paulinist ball and ran with it. So, Jesus as the M. b. David at his first appearance is moot, because that is still prophecy yet to be fulfilled at it's expected time. However, Jesus as the M. b. Joseph at his first appearance is another discussion on another thread, but... Jesus as the expected Prophet (like unto Moses) is a different story. He does check that box...as Moses' prophecy was not constrained to a particular time in the future (like the M. b. David is to at the end of the 6000th year). So, Jesus as the expected Prophet (like unto Moses) is prophecy: fulfilled. Jesus as the expected messiah b. Joseph (the suffering servant) is prophecy: fulfilled. Jesus as the expected Messiah b. David (as the conquering King) is prophecy: yet to be fulfilled.
@thenazareneperspective2734, there is no need for a Messiah. Read 1 Samuel 8:7. Then read comes after that. A Messiah is a King of Israel (which Jesus never was) but there was never a need for that. Many like David & Solomon were kings in the past, but none came to deliver the Israelites from Rome. Jesus didn't bring peace, but he sure brought persecution of the Jews & cause the Holocaust. Also, the "suffering servant" is clearly named "Jacob" or "Israel," and is never named "Jesus." Today, Jews still call God their Father & their King. That's how it was supposed to be. No need for a false messiah, seriously. The time of human kings is over. True Jews worship their original King. Christians worship a man.
@@RightOnBro72 Thanks for the reply. You said; "there is no need for a Messiah. Read 1 Samuel 8:7. Then read comes after that." My reply: I've read it many times...and again just now. You said: "A Messiah is a King of Israel (which Jesus never was) but there was never a need for that." My reply: A messiah is more than just a King of Israel (although he can be), a messiah is anyone anointed of God to do a specific task. A prophet can be a messiah (Moses, Samuel, Elijah, Micah, Jesus, et al). A priest can be a messiah (Aaron (past), Jesus (past, present, future). A king can be a messiah (David, Solomon, Cyrus (past), Jesus (future). A messiah can be any combination, or all of them (Jesus (future)). You said; "Many like David & Solomon were kings in the past, but none came to deliver the Israelites from Rome." My reply: What you say is true, but obviously you didn't read my opening statement completely, or you don't know about the 7-days of creation / 7000-year prophetical template. I had briefly addressed this in the opening post. Jesus did not fulfill the prophecies assigned to the Messiah b. David because it wasn't historically the right time. That is to occur in the near future. At that time, the Messiah b. David (Jesus) will return to defeat most likely the armies of a future Levantine Caliphate as being the last empire that will assault Israel/Jerusalem. You said; "Jesus didn't bring peace, but he sure brought persecution of the Jews & cause the Holocaust.} My reply: The blame game and the blindness continues. It wasn't Jesus who brought the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes-Persians, Greeks, and Romans, nor the Arabic Empires to persecute the Israelites, it was the JEWS themselves who caused their own problems and punishment. Modern Jews are blind by the fact that Jesus came to restore backslidden Judaism....He did not come to bring Paulinist Christianity (that was a subversion against the Nazarenes and Judaism). But Jews being Jews....are still blind to that fact. About the "didn't bring peace" comment that is linked to "the sword and separation". It is a canard argument that the rabbi's should know better on what is meant by it. Jesus was speaking about a spiritual sword that will separate people....during that time (and it still does). For example, if a Jewish family follows the Jewish traditions of Moses, suddenly has a family member who begins to follow the Jewish traditions of Jesus (not the gentile Paul) and becomes a Nazarene (as not to hold to the traditions of the blood and animal sacrifices of Mosaic Judaism), by not observing those laws and customs associated with Moses that Jesus removed...that is a separation using a "spiritual" sword. Regarding world-wide peace, it's not supposed to happen yet. It will happen when Jesus returns as the Go'el and saves the remnant righteous at the future Time of Jacob's trouble. Once the Messiah b. David returns in the form of Jesus, there will be peace throughout the world (for 1000 years anyway). You said; "Also, the "suffering servant" is clearly named "Jacob" or "Israel," and is never named "Jesus."" My reply: There is no doubt that Jacob, Israel, Moses, and others are called "servants" by name. It is a stretch, and grasping at straws, to say the "Messiah b. Joseph = the suffering servant = Jacob/Israel". To say that Messiah b. Joseph is an entire nation/people is a canard. The Messiah b. Joseph is a single man. Regarding the "never named Jesus" comment. Again, it is a canard. The "servant" is also named the "branch"....which Jesus fits the description for completely. You said; "Today, Jews still call God their Father & their King. That's how it was supposed to be." My reply: And rightly so. Jesus and the 12 Nazarene Apostles did the same. You said: No need for a false messiah, seriously. My reply: Agreed 100%, and there will be some to appear claiming to be the real messiah (i.e. Bar Kochba, the future returned Mahdi perhaps) who aren't. Remind me real quick about which part makes Jesus a "false messiah"? Because he hadn't fulfilled prophecies designed to be fulfilled at the end of the Age yet? Does that make him a "false messiah"? Not so, it simply makes it prophecy yet to be fulfilled (in its due time). You said; "The time of human kings is over." My reply: Agreed. You said; "True Jews worship their original King." My reply: Agreed. You said; "Christians worship a man." My reply: And I would say Paulinist Christians do...100%. Jesus and the Nazarenes did not.
The Nazarenes/Ebionites did NOT believe that Jesus was born of a virgin. They believed he was born of Joseph and Mary (conceived and born by natural means)...and that because it was time (historically), and because he was a righteous and pious Jew, he became the "adopted" "Son of God" at his adult baptism. Having had the complete 7-facet "Holy Spirit of God" as well as the "Spirit of the Messiah (the Memra)" being placed upon him at that time.
@@AdaraBalabusta My comment: "The Nazarenes/Ebionites did NOT believe that Jesus was born of a virgin. They believed he was born of Joseph and Mary (conceived and born by natural means)...and that because it was time (historically), and because he was a righteous and pious Jew, he became the "adopted" "Son of God" at his adult baptism.' Refs: - Epiphanius: The Panarion: 5 ANACEPHALAEOSIS II: Part 30: Epiphanius Against the Ebionites: Chap 2:2. Read complete disposition of part 30. - Epiphanius: The Panarion: 5 ANACEPHALAEOSIS II: Part 30: Epiphanius Against the Ebionites: Chap 14:2-4. Read the complete disposition. - Epiphanius: The Panarion: 5 ANACEPHALAEOSIS II: Part 30: Epiphanius Against the Ebionites: Chap 16:3-4. Read the complete disposition.
1. Jesus-worshipers target Jewish people to lure them into worshipping a false deity. 2. Some people are interested in both faiths. Obey the Noahide laws. 🕊✡️❤️
hASHEM WILL NOT LET IT BE...MAY BE THIS IS WHY TIAMAT IS HERE! tHE GREAT DIP OF THE EARTH. ? wE STILL SHAKE RATTLE AND ROLL YET THE DIP? FROM NEW PROPHFETS IS IN QUESTION? yET KNOW HISTORY...aLL i KNOW IS THE CARRY... WHY? THE GOOD WAY. yES BAD IS THERE YET GOOD IS THERE TOO!
This is the most disappointing interview and the most dense guest whom you ever invited for an interview. Federow obviously never read the book, and the basic ideas of the book are sound, while "Rabbi Federow" gives a rebuttal with his own misunderstanding. Do not invite him back, please. He is not informed.
@@DanaAdams-bc5ug God loves us so much he sent his only begotten Son to be our sacrifice ! God loves us that much ! so we can be with him ! so yes Love God and know God loves us that much ! Gods salvation plan 🥰
