Im taking online classes at NCCU and this is such a valuable resource. Thank you so much! You are teaching at such a high level. I also have an associates degree from WTCC and I have found that some of the professors there are better and more experienced than some of the other public universities that I have attended in the past.
But the courts have given them that power to ignore the constitution and the law and not suffer a consequences for it . State legislatures could change it a few have made some steps towards ending qualified immunity.
When a public servant breaks the law they have no immunity. There is no such thing as absolute immunity because nobody is allowed to break the law. I know people that sue judges. All public workers are bonded. There is bar grievances for attorneys and juditial complaints. When these prementioned are alerted to the possability of being sued. The public servant has a duty to notify the insurance company that a lawsuit may soon be initiated. Failure to notify the insurance co. May result in the insurance co not paying out on the claim because its in the insurance policy and that voids the ins co liability. Also if the insurance co gets too many complaints about any worker the insurance company could likely deem that public servant too much risk. The ins. Co. Will refuse to bond that employee and non bondable is nonemployable.
The police ,are today's Roman guards im a ran ,its my opinion ,politicalybised Centralized comands, we need.!my experience the police loyally and blind faithfully follow their leadership. I
Courts are courts of revenue. The police enforce statutes and codes. The police work for a foreign corporation. What we need to do is hold bad actors liable through accountability. As we do that the wrinkles will work themselves out. When we the poleipke demand and hold these employees of OURS accountable. It forces all issues to have light cast upon them. It is very effective and simple to learn some law and know tour rights and how to exercise them. Then you start going after the bad ones using the legal system and the courts. The saying that goes.... he who represents himself has a fool for a client. That may be the biggest myth in all of law. When you accept an attorney you are telling the courts you are incompacitated. You are not of sound mind. Theres 2 types of pro se's. More than half have little idea what they are doing and its felt by all involved. The courts become often displeased. Then theres the pro se's that make 30 year seinor law firm attorneys that often have nothing to counter with and file stall tactics or site irrelevant cases. If your offense or defence is based on sound principles of law then you dont need to argue and plead your stance.... you present it with facts. Those people that all work in the courts have a working relationship. A bond. An understanding. They know how eachother is likely to respond to certain things that became routine fron working together. None of them is looking to put the other in an uncomfortable situation because that would be putting themselves in an uncomfortable situation and remaining morally intact gets tested constantly. The courts have a 90% conviction rate in criminal cases. What good is hiring an attorney? Pro se's can filen bar grievances and juditial complaints. Public workers don't file those things on eachother. File your complaints because they may not be sanctioned from their own. ... the insurance companies hate liability more than anything.
Thanks for the course but could you maybe try not drinking and eating and making all that disgusting noise with your tongue and throat the entire time so I can focus on what you're actually saying?
20:18 I'm sorry but u are wrong. Every agent that is a peace officers to govenors to judges operate within their de facto corporate capacities and not their de jure government capacities. Owen's vs. City of independence 1982 Supreme Court reports vol. 100 page 1398 Main vs. Thiboutot 1979 Supreme court reports vol. 100 page 2502 Now since 1871 we have had a de facto corporations and banks posing as a de jure government. Those two Supreme courts cases plainly stats that officers of the court/gov cannot claim they operate under good faith cause they operate within their private corporate capacity and when they violate our inherit rights at their own peril. The CITY OF, COUNTY OF, STATE OF, UNITED STATES OF along with the BAR corporations. They are not legitimate sovereign government. John Jay made it clear that the American people are the true sovereigns not the state.
