Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (Main Titles) 

Well, it's a good thing it does!

Agree!

I KNOW RIGHT

Also the “laughing” chant just has this hint of insanity that also kind of lends to wonka especially this depiction

@@seasons1745 well in the books, Willy Wonka is shown as an eccentric and fun loving genius while the movies messed up that, like in the first movie he literally was a half crazed maniac

I agree.

Good comment! I didn't think this! And we have a proof: Outside the factory the town of charlie is always grey and dark as winter and a depress sad world. But then inside the factory of wonka is a colored, saturated, psychedelism place like tv and fashion around the 60s and 70s fashions right?

Immie B นนนน

A Tim Burton film will always be some what dark but in a charming way that’s why I almost all the movies he makes

Yep.

And I love them both.

@@lucianhartt3123 no

To be fair, this is probably closer to what Roald Dahl would’ve wanted really. For the record, he HATED the ‘71 version.

@@flanplan5903 I would give ANYTHING to see Dahl's reaction to this one.

Danny elfman and Tim burton what a great combo

Agreed

​@Isaac Shumski The fact that she's able to play two very different characters (as in they're pretty much opposites of each other) is proof that she's a talented actress. Mrs. Bucket and Bellatrix LeStrange are nothing alike, the only thing they have in common is Bonham Carter. Similar to how Johnny Depp can play both Captain Jack Sparrow and Willy Wonka. Sure, they have more in common than Bucket and LeStrange. They're both two goofy and loveable people. But what makes them so is very different. One is a drunken pirate with a savage sense of humor, the other is a sociopathic businessman with a dark sense of humor. In contrast, Count Dooku and Dr. Wonka are both cold. Nothing against Christopher Lee, he's awesome. I'm just using two of his characters as a contrasting example to two Helena Bonham Carter's characters and two of Johnny Depp's characters. Vive Medici!

Thanks for the idea

_Amber_ Heard? Vive Medici!

you mean heard*? Vive Medici!

Tim Burton just has a completely different vision

@@holzkatz1 On the contrary, the writers of the 1971 version had a different vision. Burton's vision was relatively the same as Dahl's. Vive Medici!

Chandler Burse Well or course he was not perfect! He was poor and becoming very skinny. He nibbles on chocolate if he can not stand looking at the chocolate.

Chandler Burse Not completely perfect though.

@Chandler Burse it also created the climax

that explains why the creator hated the book

Miss Pookie Fethers i

Doesn't the mear mention of the movie make people crave chocolate.

Ah. I just noticed that.

Holy shit, I didn't even realize that.

Well technically Buckinghamshire but it's reasonable to assume there would be a distribution centre in London to cater for the Home Counties

Kinda b r i t i s h

German-Canadian Enclave the movie version has machine sounds in the background

If you have bought the blueray version, you will have the movie version without the SFX. So exactly what you want :).

Balon Greyjoy wow 9 years ago

11

12

FaDeNitroz I agree too

OnO original was always better, but opening, I agree

Nope. This movie is good on its own. But it doesn’t even hold a candle to the original

Jakethedog3275 The original wasnt even the original. The book was the original, a book which the author of literally sat outside movie theaters begging people not to see the "original" Willy Wonka movie. The 2005 adaption actually draws from the book to emphasize the deranged madman that is Willy Wonka and the mystery of his strange chocolate factory far better. The first movie emphasises on more of a childlike glee and excitement, aside from the very bad tunnel scene which was their attempt at emphasising his creepy side.

Agreed. But I still do love the original.

Cough cough! John Williams Cough Cough!

Exactly!

I don’t even know what this means but I love it

Same