Charlie Kirk Humiliates Naive Socialist Student 

Tell that poor delusional student to come back in ten years, after he has had REAL world experience!

When your facts don't fit your narrative you change the facts

Cuba/Life expectancy 73.68 years (2021) found on google, and im not even a uni student. uni students are so dumb today.

The problem is liberals-specifically young liberals with minimal life experience- have these unrealistic views on reality. I can't say it's wrong to wish there was this idealistic reality, but communism has a proven track record of failure. It has never worked. Not once. Even if a regime continues to practice communism, that does not mean it's working. It's a proven fact that people are not willing to carry a larger burden so others can carry a lesser burden yet get the same benefits and live the same way. Sure, idealistically everyone would have great health insurance, live in a nice house, have a new car in the driveway and money in the bank, but that's not reality especially in a communist regime. Human rights are denied (China,) infrastructure deteriorates, (Cuba,) and people are generally miserable except for the elite few at the top. But getting back to the point, the younger you are and the more time you spend in a liberal college the less realistic your ideals are. I'm not saying young people are stupid, just inexperienced and inserted into a hyper liberal think tank. The left feels they know how to spend YOUR income better than you do. That's why low taxes and capitalism is the best system. In the U.S., half of our income goes to taxes in one form or another, and that's far too much. But it's still better than a communist system.

I wonder what did the student smoke or take? He need to move to Cuba

He is upset because Charlie is prepared for debates.

This guy is trying to say that Charlie is convincing and he doesn't like it!

If I understood him correctly, he said that Charlie gives objective facts, but presents them subjectively. But that's the point! Someone else is supposed to debate him with those other facts that back the other person's opinion. Charlie is supposed to give the subjective points that defend his position in the debate, not both; although he could bring a point that defends the "opposite" opinion and then refute it by stating other facts & his opinion.

I lost bran cells listening to that guy

To the last guy, it doesn't matter that Charlie doesn't present the entirety of the data in the statistic because not saying some Democrat cities are also good DOES NOT invalidate the clear fact that ALL of the worst cities are Democrat!

First time watching a video here. Liked and subscribed, well done.❤

In regards to just the example the young man gave about Democratic run cities (for example): In discussing the poorest cities, pointing out that they are 100% run by left politicians is reasonable. The wealthiest cities are not a part of the equation. No one needs to defend any city that is wealthy and entitled. The fact is that wealthy cities are probably pretty ok at the moment, no matter who is in charge. It would be antithetical to debate about the legislation and problems with poor cities and randomly interject statistics about how Beverly Hills is doing! If all the wealthiest cities in the US were governed by Republicans it would not be significant to cite that as a reason for Conservatism since extremely wealthy people tend to do well in ALL economic circumstances! (Sometimes, it's difficult to explain something that seems so obvious. Like explaining a joke to someone. It's almost painful, which is how I would characterize this cringe exchange, lol)

Oh shit 🤦‍♀️💯 rock student is a rocks!!

Can you imagine this being your child and you paid all that money for him to go to college and he is going to ti google 🐈‍⬛💯

Anyone know where to find the full video of this? I can only find “reaction” and none of them link the original video!!!!

The first guy, okay. I want to talk about how you phrase abortion. Okay, let me rephrase it for you, okay, never mind that question

Candace saying i wish you would just debate Charlie, he was until the rest of the panel butted in. But admittedly i was totally confused about what he was trying to get at, is it just me that thinks he was going for the John Wick look ?

The pro choice, like him, do what he complains about. Most of us should know a bit about why our brains and hormones try to drive us to have sex. Even if neither wants a child or can’t raise one. Knowing that shouldn’t they choose other ways to get sexual release that do not risk fertilization? When they make bad choices instead, why should they be allowed to change their minds later? I do give two passes for teens because they are teens. Men and women considered adults, no. I believe in abortion for all rape victims but I think theyshould be required to go to a hospital first and report to police second. Too many real rape victims do not go to a hospital right away. Despite about 60 years of supposedly teaching kids and adults to do so. I also support abortion when there are birth defects detected and if the pregnancy is life threatening. Just no for those who think they have the right to do whatever they want or think of sex as entertainment. It has been about 20 years since I heard the news media or politicians talk about STD rates in the USA. Bet they are higherper capita than forty years ago. Condoms are not cheap. The Pill is but neither that nor any other kind of birth control I am aware of protects people from STDs even a bit. Since so many abortions are done annually, too many are not using those nor condoms. I think the pro unaccountability side should consider being for reasonable behavior instead.