China, Japan coast guards face off near disputed islands in East China Sea || DD India News Hour 

India is a great nation that is behaving sensibly unlike the gangster China.

India has balls and are standing up to covid china

@@bluesky90010 You're 100% correct! Love from Malaysia.

There might be a chance to defeat China in court instead of going to the battle field. That is, we sue China for violating Article 89 of the UNCLOS. The said article says: "No state may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty." China did exactly that with its 9 dashes claim; the dashes encircled a large part of the High Sea to its sovereignty. China cannot deny such a fact. That is, we are guaranteed a victory. The victory means the 9 dashes are no more. Consequently, China will leave the SCS and thereby all tensions and war cries will disappear.

Hahhaha

Lol 😂

​@@tomsunuwar6940 Oh CCP bot spotted, guess you are too busy now. I heard on the news that Xi King-Pin pays good money for nationalist promoter puppets 😂

Lol​@@tomsunuwar6940

thank you japan and US

@@tomsunuwar6940 olol ka!

mabuhay ang pilipinas

Indians are one of the friendliest people I know

FACTS na verifiable, tingnan lng sa internet: 1. Pinatutupad at pinatitindi na ng US ang kanilang "Pivot to Indo Pacific" na may pangunahing layunin na gyerahin ang China, bago ito lumakas nang husto, militarily. 2. Itinuturing ng US na banta sa kanilang pagiging dominanteng super power ang China. 3. Sinasakyan ng US yang dispute natin with China sa SCS. gumagawa ng "scenario" ang PCG para harangin ng CCG at magmukhang kawawa at biktima ng bullying. bayad ang naturang "zarzuela" na ang tumitimon dito ay si retired Col. Raymond Powell ng Gordian Knot Center (GKC), na pinopondohan ng Office of Naval Research (ONR) ng US Navy 4. sa halip na tumulong sa diplomatic solution, sinusulsulan, binubuyo, at itinutulak tayo ng kano na gyerahin ang china, at kunwari tutulungan tayo. "Proxy war" ang kauuwian, ayon din sa mga geopolitical analysts sa buong mundo. 5. Ang "niluluto" ng kano na gyera laban sa China ay alinsunod sa kanilang "Pivot to Asia Pacific." 6. Nais ng US na panatilihin ang unipolar world na sila lng ang dominant superpower at ang gusto lng nila ang masusunod.

eat your bag of rice from amurika bo

​@@robertolang9684i already know where you live. do be careful you might not live long enough.

God have certainly condemned any sphere of US influence. don't forget Japanese were worst in terms of civilians killing during world 2.

Except digong DUTERTE...

only Duterte,Roque,Panelo, Robin,Bato,Bong Go, and the rest of congs/senator apologists are afraid of China 😄😆

Ano ang gawin natin kung ulanin tayo ng drones at missiles ng China kagaya sa ginawa ng Iran sa Israel? Sana hindi kami madamay, kayo lang sana na matatapang.

Except for Philippine Coast Guard Generals and AFP Generals. They're cowards. They're only brave against their own people.

Dutiti

The Lady speaker doesn't know anything she just talking nonsense.

There might be a chance to defeat China in court instead of going to the battle field. That is, we sue China for violating Article 89 of the UNCLOS. The said article says: "No state may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty." China did exactly that with its 9 dashes claim; the dashes encircled a large part of the High Sea to its sovereignty. China cannot deny such a fact. That is, we are guaranteed a victory. The victory means the 9 dashes are no more. Consequently, China will leave the SCS and thereby all tensions and war cries will disappear.

The four countries, US, Australia, Japan and the Philippines have put together a total of five naval ships. They declared that they will conduct anti-submarine warfare training, giving Manila the illusion that it can really confront the PLA in the South China Sea. While the four countries are conducting joint exercises under the guise of supporting the Philippines, it is clear who is using whom.

@@verdanaf inside ph ezz.

​@@verdanafIt's better than being bullied by the Chinese. Look at what China is doing now, trying to be a dumb diplomat.

@@unknownmysterious9918 ru-vid.comzuv45vNvLUI?si=wvcUSZ77C75Svp-m

There might be a chance to defeat China in court instead of going to the battle field. That is, we sue China for violating Article 89 of the UNCLOS. The said article says: "No state may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty." China did exactly that with its 9 dashes claim; the dashes encircled a large part of the High Sea to its sovereignty. China cannot deny such a fact. That is, we are guaranteed a victory. The victory means the 9 dashes are no more. Consequently, China will leave the SCS and thereby all tensions and war cries will disappear.

Ito ang facts mula sa PCA Arbitral Court Award: 1. Ayungin Shoal is "militarized" and is outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal 3. even though Ayungin Shoal is within the 200 nautical miles off palawan, EEZ cannot be applied because the shoal is quintessentially "militarized" according to the Arbitral Court ruling 3. EEZ is not our territory. we only have "sovereign rights" 4. "Sovereignty" is different from sovereign rights. pinagbabaligtad ng mga nambubuyo, nagsusulsol at nanggagatong sa mga ignoranteng pilipino ang 2 termino 5. hanggang 12 nautical miles lng mula sa ating archipelagic baseline ang ating territorial sea. SOURCE: the PCA Arbitral Court Award.

@@verdanaf China isn't exception.. let me guess China dont know where their EEZ since their eyes is very small.. its so funny China asked France that Paracel Islands should be part of China territories since it within their EEZ.. Paracel Islands was part of France territories during colonial era.

Strongly Agree

China learn from america but china more better not to bomb small country , philipinos must wake up cause marcos think his money not peoples

juht​@@cherrybello7992

There might be a chance to defeat China in court instead of going to the battle field. That is, we sue China for violating Article 89 of the UNCLOS. The said article says: "No state may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty." China did exactly that with its 9 dashes claim; the dashes encircled a large part of the High Sea to its sovereignty. China cannot deny such a fact. That is, we are guaranteed a victory. The victory means the 9 dashes are no more. Consequently, China will leave the SCS and thereby all tensions and war cries will disappear.

CHINA always do the blame game, they think people around them are stupid not knowing they make themselve a fool and idiot, they always portray that they are peaceful country and wants to negotiate but they do otherwise, CHINA remember this Actions speaks louder than your spokeperson.

i second the motion!! wake the fuck up - eddie_abbew

Correct🙏

Tell it to XI JING PING… 😂❤🎉😢😮

I Too second d motion. 2nd Thomas Shoal is Exclusively for the Philippines...SHAME ON YOU CHINA FOR CLAIMING IT...YOUR LAND IS MILES MILES AWAY..STUPIDS..

The PCA Arbitral Ruling did not rule in favor of the Philippines. Ayungin Shoal is outside of its jurisdiction because it is "quintessentially militarized". See paragraph 1161~1162 of the "hoax arbitration." It was also declared in the ruling that Ayungin shoal is a "low tide elevation" and that even if it is within the 200 nautical miles limit, EEZ is not applicable.

Philippines need to act firm or else China will invade the Philippines just like Tibet

WPS is not yet recognized internationally. Its only basis was the administrative order of Noynoy Aquino. To be recognized as "West Philippine Sea," we have to conduct hydrographic surveys put coordinates in its boundaries, NAMRIA has to make the map, then submit those to the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO) and also to the International Hydrographic Organization(IHO).

For better appreciation and understanding, here's for people who obviously did not read and study the South China Sea Arbitration Award, nor listen to concerned elders on how to manage the conflict in the South China Sea: 1. Ang Ayungin Shoal ay inaangkin din ng Vietnam at China 2. Hindi natin ito teritoryo maski na pasok ito sa "200 nautical miles" mula sa ating "coastal baseline" 3. Hindi ito sakop ng "jurisdiction" ng Arbitral Court dahil nanatili itong "militarized" at disputed ayon sa deskripsyon ng UNCLOS. 4. Hindi "applicable" ang EEZ sa Ayungin Shoal, dahil paano ka nga naman mangingisda, o magbubutas para alamin kung may langis o gas o kahit anupang yamang dagat sa ilalim ng naturang Shoal kung may nag-gigiriang pwersa ng mga claimants, na sa ngayon ay China ang kumokontrol. At kung igigiit ang "sovereign rights" natin ay gyera ang kahahantungan 5. Mas maganda at makabubuti kung makipa-usap at daanin sa diplomasya kaysa sundin ang sulsol, buyo at pagtulak sa atin ng kano na makipag-away sa China, dahil sa pangakong nasa likod natin sila. 6. Sa halip na palaguin ang ating ekonomiya, pigilin ang sobrang pagtaas ng presyo ng bilihin, ng kuryente at tubig at ng ibapa, ay nabaling na ang gobyerno ngayon sa pagbili ng mga armas pandigma at mga missile launchers, missiles bombs, tanke eroplano, helicopters, sasakyang pandagat, at iba pa. 7. Walang nananalo sa gyera kundi ang mga gumagawa at nagbebenta ng mga gamit at armas pandigma. Maraming Pilipino mamatay dahil sa "proxy war" na ipinagagawa sa atin ng kano. Tulad ng nangyari sa Ukraine, marami sa atin ang namamatay, mawawasak ang mga bahay natin, mga infrastructures, at kabuhayan natin. Yun pala, sa bandang huli ay mag-uusap din para sa "tigil-putukan" at "peace negotiations!"

Under the UNCLOS only “Naturally Formed Islands” capable of sustaining human habitation and economic life on its own (for example, Luzon island) can generate maritime entitlement for up to 200 nautical miles (which includes a territorial sea of 12 nautical miles and contiguous zone of 24 nautical miles, and an EEZ of 200 nautical miles). A “Rock” for its part, being incapable of human habitation and economic life on its own, can only generate maritime entitlement of up to 12 nautical miles of territorial sea. Both can be considered as territories therefore and capable of appropriation and territorial dispute. But the Ayungin Shoal, being a mere “Low Tide Elevation” incapable of sustaining human habitation and economic life on its own, and disappears during high tide, cannot generate maritime entitlement under the UNCLOS. However, it is considered by the law, as Continental Shelf. And as correctly ruled by the Arbitral body being a “Low Tide Elevation” it means that 1.) It does not generate maritime entitlement, and CANNOT be considered a territory hence there cannot be a territorial dispute over it (that is why it is UNDISPUTED because it cannot be subject for dispute in the first place), and 2.) It is a continental shelf (because even a low tide elevation has to be attached to the sea bed), and 3.) It is a continental shelf of the Philippines being within 200 nautical miles of the low water mark of the nearest Naturally Formed Island (for example it is within a mere 105 nautical miles from West of Palawan) and hence very well within the EEZ of the Philippines. And as coastal state, Philippine rights therein are enshrined under Arts 55-58 of the UNCLOS. For example the Philippines may and can put up artificial islands, installations and structures. Philippines can explore, exploit, conserve, manage natural resources therein. The Philippines can undergo maritime scientific research therein. And the Philippines has duty and jurisdiction to protect and preserve the maritime environment therein. It is therefore absurd for China to claim territorial ownership of Ayungin Shoal, more so because the basis of its claim, the 9-dash line has been debunked by the Hague. And Ayungin Shoal, being a Low Tide Elevation cannot be subject of a territorial dispute. It cannot be a territory in the first place. But this does not mean, it cannot be part of a coastal state’s EEZ. And the Philippines happens to be that coastal state. With dues respect to China, it has no right to be in said area except for freedom of navigation. And freedom of navigation is NOT akin to a sovereign patrol. China cannot water canon agents of the coastal state therein. The same is not only a very unfriendly act, but also a unilateral one, and frowned upon by generally accepted principles of international law and the family of nations. It is wise to study first the UNCLOS when dealing with this case. Rulings are merely interpretations of the law, which happens to be UNCLOS in this case. Let us read the arbitral ruling properly as within the purview of the UNCLOS. Also let us observe the “Principle of Land Dominating the Sea.” You cannot own the waters without owning the land. And we must take note of the Continental Shelf. Mabuhay ang Pilipinas! Long live the 1987 Philippine Constitution! Mabuhay po tayong lahat! And remember, dual citizenship is allowed by law, dual allegiance is not.

And West Philippine Sea is West Philippine Sea. We call it such as a matter of sovereign policy. And this policy is based on the Constitution and generally accepted principles of international law. It is advised that we refer to the area as West Philippine Sea so it will become the norm. However, UNCLOS will still be observed as per measurements of EEZ. If China wants to contest the same, they do so before the proper international tribunal. It is 9-dash line that is without basis. The best China should do is to do better business with the Philippines and the world. Using water canons against agents of the coastal state is very unfriendly and shows the world the China should and must not be given the chance to be the world superpower. And I don’t think China wants this to be their image. After all, it is US who is always the villain right? It involves itself in proxy wars against the ISIS and the communists. It earns lots and lots of money in selling weapons and military hardware right? And we are sure China will never be like that right? We are sure China won’t align with Hamas, won’t do money trap. It will even give away its massive military hardware for free right?

FACTS na verifiable, tingnan lng sa internet: 1. Pinatutupad at pinatitindi na ng US ang kanilang "Pivot to Indo Pacific" na may pangunahing layunin na gyerahin ang China, bago ito lumakas nang husto, militarily. 2. Itinuturing ng US na banta sa kanilang pagiging dominanteng super power ang China. 3. Sinasakyan ng US yang dispute natin with China sa SCS. gumagawa ng "scenario" ang PCG para harangin ng CCG at magmukhang kawawa at biktima ng bullying. bayad ang naturang "zarzuela" na ang tumitimon dito ay si retired Col. Raymond Powell ng Gordian Knot Center (GKC), na pinopondohan ng Office of Naval Research (ONR) ng US Navy 4. sa halip na tumulong sa diplomatic solution, sinusulsulan, binubuyo, at itinutulak tayo ng kano na gyerahin ang china, at kunwari tutulungan tayo. "Proxy war" ang kauuwian, ayon din sa mga geopolitical analysts sa buong mundo. 5. Ang "niluluto" ng kano na gyera laban sa China ay alinsunod sa kanilang "Pivot to Asia Pacific." 6. Nais ng US na panatilihin ang unipolar world na sila lng ang dominant superpower at ang gusto lng nila ang masusunod.

FACTS na verifiable, tingnan lng sa internet: 1. Pinatutupad at pinatitindi na ng US ang kanilang "Pivot to Indo Pacific" na may pangunahing layunin na gyerahin ang China, bago ito lumakas nang husto, militarily. 2. Itinuturing ng US na banta sa kanilang pagiging dominanteng super power ang China. 3. Sinasakyan ng US yang dispute natin with China sa SCS. gumagawa ng "scenario" ang PCG para harangin ng CCG at magmukhang kawawa at biktima ng bullying. bayad ang naturang "zarzuela" na ang tumitimon dito ay si retired Col. Raymond Powell ng Gordian Knot Center (GKC), na pinopondohan ng Office of Naval Research (ONR) ng US Navy 4. sa halip na tumulong sa diplomatic solution, sinusulsulan, binubuyo, at itinutulak tayo ng kano na gyerahin ang china, at kunwari tutulungan tayo. "Proxy war" ang kauuwian, ayon din sa mga geopolitical analysts sa buong mundo. 5. Ang "niluluto" ng kano na gyera laban sa China ay alinsunod sa kanilang "Pivot to Asia Pacific." 6. Nais ng US na panatilihin ang unipolar world na sila lng ang dominant superpower at ang gusto lng nila ang masusunod.

😂😂😂😂

😂😂for me when the chinese foreign ministry speaks its like mosquito's that circling in your ear..that you want to kill it asap makes me annoyed

FACTS na verifiable, tingnan lng sa internet: 1. Pinatutupad at pinatitindi na ng US ang kanilang "Pivot to Indo Pacific" na may pangunahing layunin na gyerahin ang China, bago ito lumakas nang husto, militarily. 2. Itinuturing ng US na banta sa kanilang pagiging dominanteng super power ang China. 3. Sinasakyan ng US yang dispute natin with China sa SCS. gumagawa ng "scenario" ang PCG para harangin ng CCG at magmukhang kawawa at biktima ng bullying. bayad ang naturang "zarzuela" na ang tumitimon dito ay si retired Col. Raymond Powell ng Gordian Knot Center (GKC), na pinopondohan ng Office of Naval Research (ONR) ng US Navy 4. sa halip na tumulong sa diplomatic solution, sinusulsulan, binubuyo, at itinutulak tayo ng kano na gyerahin ang china, at kunwari tutulungan tayo. "Proxy war" ang kauuwian, ayon din sa mga geopolitical analysts sa buong mundo. 5. Ang "niluluto" ng kano na gyera laban sa China ay alinsunod sa kanilang "Pivot to Asia Pacific." 6. Nais ng US na panatilihin ang unipolar world na sila lng ang dominant superpower at ang gusto lng nila ang masusunod.

Don't forget pathological narcissism with illusions of grandeur.

Agreed haha

nah...too stupid and close minded to learn anything....

not as much of a bully as the european though

​@@tainlein which way?

South China Sea Dispute There has been a lot of articles South China Sea (SCS) dispute and China’s 9 Dash Line articles in recent time, with a majority of them twisting facts and trying to claim that China is bullying smaller countries with their growing military might when China is simply trying to reclaim what is rightfully theirs. In 1946 at the end of WW2 it was a US Navy battleship that took Chinese soldiers to reclaim all the islands that are currently under dispute in the SCS as China simply lacked capable ship at the time. Thus, the original R.O.C 11 Dash Line was drawn in 1947 after China recovered all the islands, the 11 Dash Line linked all the islands together to clearly mark China territorial waters which was at the time recognized by the American and international community. The 11 Dash Line was only reduced to the 9 Dash Line when China secretly transferred Bach Long Vi in the Gulf of Tonkin from China to Vietnam in 1957 so that the island could host a new radar base to provide an early warning of American planes and to serve as a transitional post for Vietnam incoming war aid material as the Vietnam War escalated. It was a goodwill and war aid material from China to support Vietnam against the US invasion. From this, we can tell how ungrateful and traitorous the Vietnamese are with their current aggressive stances toward China. Furthermore, all historical document sign by or involved any of the countries associated with the current disputes didn't lay any claim to any of the island involved in the current SCS dispute. For example: - In the 1898 Paris Treaty signed between America and Spain, both countries acknowledged that none of the disputed islands belong to the Philippines as the Philippines territory extends to the east of east meridian 118 while the dispute islands laid west of east Meridian 118. - In the 1945 Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender contained the following statement: ‘’the Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku, and such minor islands as we determine,” as had been announced in the Cairo Declaration in 1943; which clearly stated it didn't include Diaoyu Islands. In addition, the Cairo Declaration in 1943 also clearly stated all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese shall be restored to the Republic of China (that represented China at the time) and these documents were signed with Chinese participation. The American recognition of the 11 Dash Line lasted until San Francisco Conference in 1951 when the American specifically excluding China from the conference as the Communist Party in China-controlled most of mainland China at the time and proclaimed the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949. At the San Francisco Conference, the American made unilateral arrangement in an attempt to deny Chinese ownership of their islands that was previously international recognised belonging to China and put all these islands into a dispute. However, at the time no one including the current neighbouring claimants bothered to dispute China's claim to these islands and reefs, but China also did not have the ability to consistently enforce its sovereignty to these islands due to lack of military power and internal weakness caused by WW2 and the Civil War. Neighbouring states only started to violate China's claim, occupying certain islands and reefs when it was speculated that the South China Sea might contain oil and gas. For example: - During the San Francisco Treaty of 1951 in the absence of China and with the support of the American, the Philippine claim ownership of the disputed island, nevertheless the Philippine did not declare ownership of the disputed islands until late 1970 by self-proclamation. - The America took over the administrative duty of Diaoyu Islands at San Francisco Conference from China and promised to relay it to UN which they never did. The American kept the administrative rights until 1971 then transfer the administrative control of the islands to Japan at the opposition of China. - The rest of the disputed is laid according to the 1994 United Nation Convention of Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 200 nautical mile EEZs which didn't come into existence until 47 years after the establishment of dash-lines and International laws generally don't have judicial to things which preceded it. Therefore it shouldn't be applied here in the first place. Once again all the dispute was supported by the American and the American even announced that “The United States has a national interest in freedom of navigation, open access to Asia's maritime commons, and respect for international law in the South China Sea”. The United States has also called for unfettered access to the area that China claims as its own, and accused Beijing of adopting an increasingly aggressive stance on the high seas. The American has also frequently sent warships into the disputed area on so call Freedom of Navigation Operations. Now if we look at historical evidence we can further assure China claims to these islands and the 9 or 11 Dash Line. Diaoyu Islands - China claimed the discovery and ownership of the islands from the 14th century and the first Chinese records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century when they were referred as Diaoyu Dao. While the Japanese maintained ownership of the islands from 1895 until its surrender at the end of World War II which ownership should have been returned to China according to the Cairo Declaration. In the 1945 Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender also contains this statement. Spratly and Paracel Islands - The earliest written record of the Spratly Islands can be found in documents dating from the Eastern Han Dynasty 25 AD and The earliest written record of the Paracel islands can be found in historical documents dating from the Song Dynasty 960 AD. The 1887 Chinese-Vietnamese Boundary convention signed between France and China after the Sino-French War states that China was the owner of the Spratly and Paracel islands. The Qing dynasty also sent naval forces on inspection tours in 1902 and 1907 and placed flags and markers on the islands. The Qing dynasty's successor state, the Republic of China, claimed the Spratly and Paracel islands under the jurisdiction of Hainan. The Japanese occupied the Paracels and the Spratlys from February 1939 to August 1945, which was handed back to the Republic of China at the end of WW2 according to the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations. In summary, all evidences support China 9 Dash Line historical and sovereignty claim in the South China Sea. However, it has been continuously undermined with the support of the US in their greed and ambition of controlling the world energy resources, world hegemony and containment of China’s rise. International laws and organizations such as the UN are just becoming tools for the US and are no longer performing the traditional roles that they were created for in the first place. If we use the same standard of argument used against China in the SCS then the international community need to do a lot more American occupation and military bases in Guam, Diego Garcia and other Pacific islands. Additionally information: A special thank to Gerald Tan US State Dept Chief of Spatial Geography and Boundary Analysis, Daniel Dzurek, who works as a professional geographer with distinction on this exact subject; from his book "The Spratly Islands dispute: Who's on First": "Because the Allies, in particular the United Kingdom and the United States, could not agree on which government represented China, no Chinese delegation participated in the 1951 San Francisco Peace Conference. Therefore the Republic of China (Taiwan) negotiated a separate peace treaty with Japan, signed on 28 April 1952. Article 2 of the text included a reference to the San Francisco treaty: “It is recognized that under Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed in the city of San Francisco in the United States of American on September 8 1951, Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands”. Republic of China has argued that the explicit reference to the Spratly and Paracel islands in the text of this bilateral treaty implies Japanese recognition of Chinese sovereignty. Samuels and Lu have observed that, unlike the 1951 treaty, the Sino-Japanese text mentions the Spratly and Paracel islands in thesame sentence as Taiwan and the Pescadores islands. The latter are generally recognized as Chinese territories. Moreover, according to the negotiating record Japan insisted that the renunciation article deal only with Chinese territory. This shows that the ROC and Japan viewed the islands of Taiwan, the Pescadores, the Spratlys, and the Paracels as having a similar status - that is, belonging to China" US State Dept South China Sea expert Ambassador Chas Freeman who served for decades in the region, regarding China's claim to the SCS: "In 1945, in accordance with the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations and with American help, the armed forces of the Republic of China government at Nanjing accepted the surrender of the Japanese garrisons in Taiwan, including the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nanjing then declared both archipelagoes to be part of Guangdong Province. In 1946 it established garrisons on both Woody (now Yongxing) Island in the Paracels and Taiping Island in the Spratlys." Viet Nam Bach Long Vi Island history thediplomat.com/2019/08/the-south-china-sea-island-china-gave-away/

Out off the main topic ​@@tainle

100 dash line is the limit. Nahiya pa silang e include yung Indian Ocean😂😂

Crazy 9-dash-line HAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah very inconsistent

US cannot exclude China in trading bec almost all products in US are Made in China even iphone made in china

FACTS na verifiable, tingnan lng sa internet: 1. Pinatutupad at pinatitindi na ng US ang kanilang "Pivot to Indo Pacific" na may pangunahing layunin na gyerahin ang China, bago ito lumakas nang husto, militarily. 2. Itinuturing ng US na banta sa kanilang pagiging dominanteng super power ang China. 3. Sinasakyan ng US yang dispute natin with China sa SCS. gumagawa ng "scenario" ang PCG para harangin ng CCG at magmukhang kawawa at biktima ng bullying. bayad ang naturang "zarzuela" na ang tumitimon dito ay si retired Col. Raymond Powell ng Gordian Knot Center (GKC), na pinopondohan ng Office of Naval Research (ONR) ng US Navy 4. sa halip na tumulong sa diplomatic solution, sinusulsulan, binubuyo, at itinutulak tayo ng kano na gyerahin ang china, at kunwari tutulungan tayo. "Proxy war" ang kauuwian, ayon din sa mga geopolitical analysts sa buong mundo. 5. Ang "niluluto" ng kano na gyera laban sa China ay alinsunod sa kanilang "Pivot to Asia Pacific." 6. Nais ng US na panatilihin ang unipolar world na sila lng ang dominant superpower at ang gusto lng nila ang masusunod.

你是说菲都没有一艘战船？那如何能说菲能拥有南海呢？中国在那片海捕鱼的时候，菲还不是个国家，不过这并不重要，让我们看看日本要卖几艘战船给菲律宾，菲律宾将来会背上几个国家的债务问题。

Pinagsasabi mo teh

​​​@@user-cp9sq9yv6yThe West Philippine Sea or South China Sea is the traditional fishing ground of the Filipinos since 3000 to 4000 years ago. The ancient Filipinos were a seafaring people who were descendants of Austronesian peoples who escaped from southern China when the Han Chinese expanded southwards and tried to assimilate southern tribes. The ancient Filipinos already had advanced naval architecture and sophisticated engineering skills in terms of shipbuilding technology.

​@@user-cp9sq9yv6y​​西菲律宾海或南中国海是菲律宾人自 3000 至 4000 年前以来的传统渔场。古代菲律宾人是一个航海民族，他们是南岛民族的后裔，当汉族向南扩张并试图同化南方部落时，他们从中国南方逃出。古代菲律宾人在造船技术方面已经拥有先进的船舶建筑和复杂的船舶工程技能。

​@@user-cp9sq9yv6yafter spreading covid now you are claiming other countries.. is it really a failed experiment isnt it

China, 5000 years of civilised, during this Admiral cheng how, China is already control South China Sea, eleven dot. Line

😡😡😡

over 😂😂 china expansionism want to invade the whole country the philippines

Nyahahaha

China owns the moon and Mars according to their law and history. Mao landed on the moon and Mars in his dreams.

Chinese traps are dangerous!!!

Stop paying it

@@allanjava21 your government has no power here enjoy the freedom of speech instead of backing presidents that don’t support basic human rights

@@allanjava21 its true enjoy the freedom of speech and not people that manage countries with no human rights

It true and I don't know why our African leaders ​will be so stupid to take money from China@@allanjava21

Haha, they dont have balls to do that, thats why they're called bullies😂.

​@@pParZz1893😂

😂😂😂

Yes cuz China us the father of confusion

The only thing that China does not claim is the Wuhan virus 🦇

😂😂😂

That's the very reason why it is called CONFUSION because he seemed to be confused.😂

FACTS na verifiable, tingnan lng sa internet: 1. Pinatutupad at pinatitindi na ng US ang kanilang "Pivot to Indo Pacific" na may pangunahing layunin na gyerahin ang China, bago ito lumakas nang husto, militarily. 2. Itinuturing ng US na banta sa kanilang pagiging dominanteng super power ang China. 3. Sinasakyan ng US yang dispute natin with China sa SCS. gumagawa ng "scenario" ang PCG para harangin ng CCG at magmukhang kawawa at biktima ng bullying. bayad ang naturang "zarzuela" na ang tumitimon dito ay si retired Col. Raymond Powell ng Gordian Knot Center (GKC), na pinopondohan ng Office of Naval Research (ONR) ng US Navy 4. sa halip na tumulong sa diplomatic solution, sinusulsulan, binubuyo, at itinutulak tayo ng kano na gyerahin ang china, at kunwari tutulungan tayo. "Proxy war" ang kauuwian, ayon din sa mga geopolitical analysts sa buong mundo. 5. Ang "niluluto" ng kano na gyera laban sa China ay alinsunod sa kanilang "Pivot to Asia Pacific." 6. Nais ng US na panatilihin ang unipolar world na sila lng ang dominant superpower at ang gusto lng nila ang masusunod.

Not only he is to blame. He's also stupid for believing Duterte for his lies.

China cost guard law.

Pooh's law

Winnie the pooh law😂😂😂😂

Tofu law.

The UN Declaration when it was accepted as member and recognizing Taiwan as its province. The US signed such Declaration. Prior to this, the basis of its claim is the San Francisco Treaty. Also the Taiwan Treaty and the Cairo Conference. There are various existing laws governing the region before the UNCLOS became effective in 1994.

Simply China is greedy😡

GREED

Greedy even our shiitt 💩 out they claim it.

Correct 💯

Very lie maoning😅

Meow ning😂

It is still disputed. The Arbitral Tribunal did not rule on "sovereignty" but only on "sovereign rights." Ito ang tutoong facts mula sa PCA Arbitral Court Award: 1. Ayungin Shoal is "militarized" and is outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal 3. even though Ayungin Shoal is within the 200 nautical miles off palawan, EEZ cannot be applied because the shoal is quintessentially "militarized" according to the Arbitral Court ruling 3. EEZ is not our territory. we only have "sovereign rights" 4. "Sovereignty" is different from sovereign rights. pinagbabaligtad ng mga nambubuyo, nagsusulsol at nanggagatong sa mga ignoranteng pilipino ang 2 termino 5. hanggang 12 nautical miles lng mula sa ating archipelagic baseline ang ating territorial sea. SOURCE: the PCA Arbitral Court Award.

Pun an pa sa traydor nga digong gipasud ang pogo scam / officail chiness coast guard gipasud sa ph coast guard

The four countries, US, Australia, Japan and the Philippines have put together a total of five naval ships. They declared that they will conduct anti-submarine warfare training, giving Manila the illusion that it can really confront the PLA in the South China Sea. While the four countries are conducting joint exercises under the guise of supporting the Philippines, it is clear who is using whom.

@@verdanaf "The mere fact that China received no support from even a single country on this matter makes it clear who the aggressor is.

@@verdanaf They can see for themselves that China behavior is disgusting and against all international norms.

💪💪🎃👍👍👍🙏

Though the US signed UNCLOS, it did not RATIFY it as a Treaty.

China does not accept arbitration knowing it will lose.

Their greed and lies..

Because china want to control everywhere so greedy

That's a fact !

true ha ha😂