China's Nuclear Weapons are Garbage! 

Frustrating times we're living in, I'm incredibly grateful to all of you that support me by watching my videos... You're Awesome! Support Sasha and I on Patreon: www.patreon.com/serpentza Paypal: paypal.me/winstonsterzel

Today I learned there's a species of caterpillar that looks like a snake to ward off predators.

Even a bad nuclear weapon is still a nuclear weapon.

USA: “Chinas nukes suck” Japan: “A Nuke is a nuke man”

I grew up in South Africa, severed in the SADF in the 80's and have seen a lot of stuff a man should never see but the worst thing I ever have seen was a Chinese man cooking a live dog in boiling oil, I will never get rid of the sound of the dog and the image of it.

"And yes. I did just compare the Chinese government to a caterpillar that mimics a snake. Let's move on." Brilliant comment. 👏👏👏

Another detail showing that those tractors are fake or were designed by someone who has no idea of tractors or farming is that they don’t have any provision to add ballast on the front of the tractor. If you try to operate a heavy 3 point-hitch load without front-mounted ballast, the front wheels will tend to skate across the ground when you turn. That might be the reason why they can't plow in straight lines.

In that military parade, none of them were real missiles. They were empty tubes. The vehicles were too high on the suspension.

Bang on bro 🙏🏻! They were screaming like girls and running around after their attack was repulsed in Galwan - Ladhak (India). Then most of their troops fainted in high altitude. Then they complained about food and wanted to go home..all wireless intercepts are avalaible. Plus when they tried to capture another peak and had early advantage to move up the mountain, not a single of their troopers could make it and were out manoeuvred. Their weapon barrels were useless in cold areas and faced degradation in 30 days. Tank engines had malfunctions. ..yes they actully got tanks up there, bcs they don't know any better and are heavily mechanised. (Learnt nothing from Afghanistan - Russia episode)..they list is too long. Best was their actual crying when stationed in high altitude. Lastly, due to lack of acclimatization, their entire regiments were rotated on 3 occasions within span of two months ...and it continues.

It's the one thing I noticed as a US veteran. Most of the developing countries do not practice. To be good at warfare you have to run daily drills. If you just make equipment and let your people try it two or three times a year they will fail. That's not even a question that's a simple fact. Period. You have to run fighter jets all week every week. Tank drills, halo drops, set up forward operating bases, naval drills. All year round, BE PREPARED! Anything less than muscle memory will collapse under pressure.

“When your enemy is making a mistake, try not to interrupt them” -Napoleon

Thanks for all the informative work you do. To be forewarned is to be fore armed.

I've been studying on the top engineering university in Germany, along with a couple of chinese exchange students. They were known to be the first sitting in the library in the morning and the last to go in the evening - some even sleeping inside. Yet, in the exams they scored the worst scores of all students regularly. The language barrier is no explanation because in electrical engineering all you do is maths. So somehow chinese understanding of engineering and maths is different to western unerstanding. I think it has to do with copying, learning by heart instead of creativity and real understanding

"poorly made and badly trained nukes" is like "poison that is past it's expiration date" you never know if it is more dangerous or less.

the hydrogen-powered cow had me in tears

Protect this man at all costs!

Thank u for such an informative video. Watching from Philippines.

The "made in China" label should tell you everything

I worked for a company here in the US - a government contractor manufacturing parts for US military aircraft. They have several factories in China (and India), making parts for the US - some military, some civilian stuff. They have access to the computer data and blueprints. When the US Navy rolled out the newly designed Gatling Gun, the Chinese had one within half a year. I confronted management, and they told me not to worry. So I quit. I won't be part of this. Do the Chinese subsist on copying everything and build 2nd grade, cheap crap? Yeah. But as Mao said - "we don't care - we have enough cannon fodder"...then I get fired from a job at a University because I mentioned why I quit the other job - does that say something?

Thanks for another informative post. 👌

Thank you Amazing video as always

I love your dark sense of humor Winston, comparing the CCP to a caterpillar mimicking a snake, that's gold.

"These chickens even laid eggs after the explosion." Yes, people used to use radium suppositories and kept taking dumps as well... until they died terrible deaths. One of the things I got very tired of when i lived in Asia was how incredibly basic and childish their style of lying is.

I really loved your program!

You’re doing incredible job! Thank you! ❤ I hope our uninformed compatriots and especially some of our govt officials are watching your material.

“Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak” - Sun Tzu, The Art of War.

"China's final warning" (Russian: последнее китайское предупреждение) is a Russian proverb that originated in the former Soviet Union, to refer to a warning that carries no real consequences. Relations between the People's Republic of China and the United States of America during the 1950s and 1960s were strained due to the Taiwan Strait issues. American military fighter jets regularly patrolled the Taiwan Strait, which led to formal protests being regularly lodged by the Chinese Communist Party in the form of a "final warning", for their fighter manoeuvres in the strait. However, no real consequences were given for ignoring the "final warnings". The People's Republic of China released their first "final warning" to the United States for their reconnaissance flights on 7 September 1958, during the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis. At the time, the United States considered the Republic of China as the sole legitimate representative of China, and conducted reconnaissance flights in waters controlled by the People's Republic of China. China would then record such incidents, and issue a "final warning" through diplomatic channels for each incident that occurred. More than 900 Chinese "final warnings" had been issued by the end of 1964.

I watch this video every time it comes up in my feed. The thumbnail makes me smile.

I did work for China's "Ministry of Aerospace" back in the 1990s both in Beijing and Shanghai. I developed test programs for various semiconductor devices and tried to teach the "engineers" how it all worked. It was a joke, they had no idea how electronics even worked . They may have made some progress in the past few years, but I am certain they are way-WAY behind the West and that includes Japan.

“The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.” ― Carl Sagan

Keep up your GREAT WORK !!!!

Well said!! STAY ALIVE!!

Stay gold, buddy. NEVER stop exposing CCP scum. You have a lifelong Indian subscriber here..

"We may lose 300 million people, so what?" Is one of the most villanous quotes that I have ever read.

Thank you for the info

As Sun Tzu said in the book the Art of War: “When weak, appear strong.”

i am shocked by what mao said

Thank you for your dedication to educate the world about China's aggression specifically in WPS.

7:51 if you pay attention to the front of the house, they had a dog tied up in the open. BTW, Argentina tried some Chinese APCs and artillery. They returned then because they were inadequate, poorly build and had the tendecy to fail. i.e. artillery rounds would not fit into a breach, the gun barrel would split like a banana peel, like a cartoon cannon, Argentinian soldiers would complain about APCs being too small and uncomfortable amongst other things. China uses poor quality steel it's not at par with western or even Russian standards.

It's easy to forget that maintenance for even a small amount of nuclear weapons is takes Alot of resources and commitment. Upgrading, likewise is not as simple as changing out components. Going by the habits of military staff and commanders being corrupt & unwilling to report bad news i wonder what the state of their nuclear arms look like.

The hydrogen powered cow was a hilarious show of how daft the CCP can truly look.

You are so awesome and good explainer 💥❤️

I bet Serpentza would be arrested if he returned to China. You're a brave man. You selflessly spread the truth about the CCP and the dangers it poses. God Bless and please stay safe

The key about Nuclear weapons capability is whether you have them deployed on submarines. Sub surface Nuclear is critical because it is the only guaranteed deterrent, everything else is flummery. The real analysis is whether the Chinese Navy have the capability to deploy SSBNs. Judging by an encounter last year in the South China see between the Chinese Navy and the Brits, they are hugely out of their depth. The Brits entire naval strategy from 1960 to the mid 00s was focused on anti submarine warfare capability, they are experts at submarine warfare and according to the defence sector press, they made the Chinese look like children. Had it been a hot encounter China would have been looking at a catastrophic defeat at sea. There's a LOT more to warfare than hardware.

I never actually know if I am supposed to be scared by China or be laughing at China

"Nukes are still nukes". Not if they aren't professionally maintained regularly. And that is highly specialised, classified and expensive. If they don't constantly maintain nukes they probably won't work. I heard that on the grape vine (not the mulberry bush).

Awesome channel! 🇺🇸

in my limited knowledge of traditional chinese warfare there was often a lot of shows and displays of force rather than precise killing machine type weaponry

Paper tiger with an army of clay soldiers.

I served over 7 years underground in a Titan ii ICBM Missile Silo. 9 megatons hydrogen bomb. My job was to launch this beast. One missile would kill everything in 96 square miles. It’s all insane. It will happen.

Watching from Brampton, Ontario, Canada ❤❤❤❤❤

"The chickens even laid eggs after the nuclear test" Then, the eggs hatched into 3 headed chicks.

Imagine being killed by a garbage rushed from the sky above you

"To defeat an enemy without fighting is the acme of skill" ~ Sun Tzu

Duty of Care Do they know what that means?

My knowledge of China is not comparable to your expertise. But living in China a little more than 10 years ago participated to change of carrier. I now study and teach so called "hostile economic environments". China is in my top 3 sources of examples. All students (except the Chinese ones - not so many left at my university), love it.

That snake mimic caterpillar is an excellent analogy of the CCP. Great video winston.

One day that caterpillar will be a butterfly and when it takes wing, hopefully the contractors didn't cheapen out on the wings lol

Well done, you earn your keep.

The only combat experience the Army has (well, beyond bullying its neighbours), is throwing a million "volunteers" into the grinder while begging Stalin to send his Air Force. And the Navy? The last more or less successful naval engagement dates to the Ming Dynasty... and that wasn't even aimed at a regular naval power. And whatever Naval Forces has now, is Soviet left-overs or copies of Soviet left-overs. Given the corruption, coupled with poor quality control in domestic production and the all those yes-men that constantly "over-fullfill the plan"... that doesn't bode well for the armed forces. Even more so, when you consider that any real patriot who'd tell the truth for the sake of his country faces execution, while the corrupt liars look at promotions. Like Russia, China is nothing more than a regional bully, in terms of military power.

Thank you Winston. Always much appreciated.

well done bro,

You are absolutely right.

I imagine that at least half of the Chinese ICBM's would not launch and a few of them would blow up in the silo or submarine or long range bombers. That being said, the remaining 1/3rdof the weapons can cause a lot of damage..

Thank you for exposing the $7 technology behind the hydrogen powered cow, fascinating stuff!

Instant subscribe

Well, if their nuclear weapons are as good as their bridges, high rise blocks, electric vehicles, high speed trains or just about anything else they manufacture, we might be safe……..

That's the thing about nukes They don't have to be efficient They just have to work ....... Unfortunately 😶

I have been on board one of their "hyper modern" frigates when it was sailing along the Somalian coast, the PLAN Zhoushan. It looks super modern from the outside. Yet the inside, the bridge and the radar/weapon control systems (yes I have been in the ops room) looks like it's from the 80's. I've seen fishing vessels with better radar. It's super clean though. Extremely clean. Yet it lacks air conditioning (imagine, in Somalian waters) and officers had to sleep with 16 in one hut without any personal belongings or storage space except for their uniforms. Officers! Our seamen had better accommodations. I have also been on an old Russian destroyer from the soviet times, they had the same radar systems as the modern Chinese ship.

If their military equipment is anything like the junk they sale at Walmart their in big trouble 😅

That’s true! Don’t trust that. Keep watching!

I worked for a Tech Venture Capital company as an analyst back in early 2000. These proposals from Chinese companies looking for funding were hilarious. For fun we'd occasionally have them fly out to our Mountain View HQ where we shredded them with pointed questions, all of which were deflected. They knew that we knew they were liars.

I'm not saying those silos aren't real. I'm not saying that China doesn't have nukes. What I am saying is that I have seen rubber, inflatable tanks and that seeing a big dome over something doesn't mean anything. I'm also saying nukes are complex technology and require care, maintenance and can be extremely finnicky. Especially when you understand how they really work. It can be really easy for them to go wrong and the difference between a supercritical mass imploded correctly and one that's imbalanced is well in the area of an order of magnitude difference. If not more.

THANKS 🙏 SERPENT

That first Chinese nuclear test is so jarring. You see all these likely impoverished soldiers with outdated weapons and horses witnessing the most devastating and complex weapon at that time. It's like seeing a a group of knights witnessing the invention of gunpowder.

You Sir are an absolute treasure!, Thank you for all you do!.

There is a saying "never underestimate your opponent"

Rule number 1 never underestimate your enemy....

You took the words right out of my mouth.

Thanks! I been watching you for a while. Every info given to us has not only helped us with the stress relief, also helps to keep our eyes on what's REALLY going on in this world. We owe you massively, please stay safe. So long as you're still standing, the world will be safer from lies!

Thanks for all you and laowhy86 do serpentza!

Don't tell Trudeau, he'll be devastated !

I had a cousin who worked on the salt treaties and witnessed the dismantling of the soviet stuff. He said it was all garbage and probably would not have even gone off.

I believe the PLA was wrecked by India in Kashmir recently.

With that tractor, the first thing that I thought was: "That looks like a miniature!" But it's even worse than that....

The hydrogen cow tractor is funny xDD

Rule 1: Never underestimate enemy.

I am a retired U.S. government medical researcher. I worked with many Chinese nationals who came to the U.S. to learn. Very dedicated and hard working individuals yet they lacked creative thinking. Very good at following protocols, but lacked innovative thinking. China is a paper tiger. All bluster with no legitimacy. If they invade Taiwan, their military will be decimated. I loved the Chinese people I worked with, yet they simply lacked the intellectual creativity to think outside "the box".

They surely overstate their capabilities, that's a given. The question is by how much?

The tractor is tool small, it would take too long to plough a field .

Awesome content SerpentZA as always!

Serpentza, fantastic video. To the point, on pace!

Spot on!

Bro this aged like milk in a hot summer day in the Amazon rainforest

That VCR in your intro is a true relic of a lost age. i was born in the 90s so i grew up with VHS, but i never saw a VHS player with so many buttons and options.

You know you got great communication skill/interaction with viewers in your videos. I don't know how but you somehow keep your viewers enganged with you speaking and always manage to get our attention without much cuts or edits. No many people can do that and really like yours this skill. Keep up!

Hmm, please refer also to this book: The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and Its Proliferation: Reed, Thomas C., Stillman, Danny B. It's old information but gives other aspects.

You stay awesome

You just nailed it when you said undermining educational systems.

During a highly publicized Chinese rocket launch a few weeks back, I jokingly commented while watching the launch, a line from a popular science fiction movie where the character asked, what is American technology doing on a Soviet satellite? Of course I changed it to, what is American technology doing on a Chinese rocket? I was surprised how many Chinese people reacted negatively and said,"none!" I am aware that China has been stealing technology from other countries for decades, though to what extent I do not know, but it was funny to see people react the way they did. I noticed a few rebuking comments from a few American rocket fans but nothing supporting the Chinese claim that their technology is all of original design. You obviously do your research. Would you care to comment on this?