China Just Lost the Space Race! 

Wouldn’t stop the CCP from claiming the moon.

@@brownro214 *"Attempting to claim"*

I do not doubt they'd try it. The matter is holding military power over something as large as the Moon would be an insane exercise in logistics. While China could maybe get away with sending people to the Moon before the US can return, if the US was serious about kicking them out, SpaceX's Starship and other landers could likely field far more troops and equipment to the Lunar surface.

Moon /Mar landing by USA and China is all FAKE . USA we lost the technology to go back to the moon .lol

"We found an ancient map describing the moon to be Chinese territory and where they may have come from." "Were building a Mars rover, and it's called kat" American news recently states the Mars rover Curious is being molested and killed by the Kat rover. Atleast they were nice enough to test their skynet out on white people first because it's easier to identify differences on whites wearing masks compared to asians without masks

@@Tokamakcat lol this video is absolutely objective on China, it was made by a person who spend YEARS living there and experiencing it for himself first hand. He experienced a long period where the official CCP policy was to treat foreigners well, then he was there for the slow transition to the official CCP policy being to treat foreigners bad and blame all of China's problems on them, and then he left. He was literally posting videos EVERY WEEK of footage he recorded by himself while riding around the countryside on his motorbike. You can still access those videos on his other RU-vid channels.

@@Tokamakcat lmao i have Chinese friends, trust me i know whats going on there🤣🤣🤣

@@Tokamakcat as someone who lived in China from 2011 till 2015 I can say that things I had experienced in that time period are 100% true.

@@Tokamakcat - 500 Social Credit

@@Tokamakcat If he is filling the information gap with truth, what's your little-man bitter problem with it? No spoken opinion on the planet is "objective" because we are human beings who view things through our own perspective. Your professor probably said similar things in a much less inflammatory way. it's very obvious this is anti-CCP, but these videos are funded by donors who make the choice to donate lol - people choose to throw them five bucks over Paypal or Patreon. It's free for everyone to view and any funding they do get is voluntary donations. You sound jaded and annoyed that someone is providing a filler to the information gap, producing videos and providing infotainment then people are choosing donating to them. Why?

Canada doesn't even have a space program and they were sending sid to China!

I thought it a Mexican chilly dog!!!!!

"Taiko" also means Big Brother in Cantonese. Triad lords and lieutenants are also addressed as taiko. When the entire country and foreign policies are run in triad like mentality It's just space with CCP characteristics.

"Taikun" (大君) also existed as a veneration in archaic Japanese. That's "tycoon" in English today. idk if there's any link lol. that line made me put my pen down and laugh

I know, I was taking a sip of coffee and inhaled, the delivery was on point 😄

they shortened "taikong" (full word) to "taiko" to merge with the "naut"

Interesting, do they even film there pilots in space to show the people 🤔. I've NEVER seen any

Many of us in the USA are really NOT sure ANYONE went to the moon 🤷‍♀️ We have VERY little trust in our institutions these days!!

We think it was a HOLLYSLEAZE production 🤑

It's always the same. Take RU-vid f.e., an american company, everyone use it in Europe, still available in Russia, but China has It's own "Intranet Version"... So does North Korea

Their entire space program is rolled into their military. It's one of the reasons people aren't usually excited about their projects. They do put some incredible technology up in space but since they are so spotty on what they choose to share, it's almost impossible to get any worthwhile data that's usable in the modern scientific context. They make it impossible to verify.

lol !!!!!!!!!!

That's all heliocentric nonsense my friend. Research flat earth.

I think ISRO - Indian Space Research Organization is much more better than Chinese Space Agency.

@@rk-is3cw yeah atleast ISRO doesn't list up fake achievements and have no bucket list of monopolizing moon for so-called "chinese" type research purposes🫠. Jokes apart but ISRO is inspirational tbh and the world can learn from the recent achievement of chandrayaan 3 on south pole.

@@acceleratorda2172 Actually as an Indian, I am proud that ISRO did great achievement with very limited Budget.

😳🙄😖😬😵‍💫

They are fantastic at mimicking

Lmao, them not using citations is kinda ironic

CCP isn't comfortable with teaching free thought. Winston covered that as well.

China has Universities?? 🤯

I think ISRO also has a reconnaissance satellite in orbit around the moon

Just means it infiltrated by China, just like Joe Biden...

@@darshpatel3427 yes that wold be the Chandrayaan-2! Unfortunately, the rover that was sent along with it failed to land successfully on the lunar surface though. :( Hopefully India will try again soon!

@@bigafroman4277 Good luck, India! Salute from a former JPL employee, now retired. 👍

That and when they both worked together to rescue Mark Watney from being stranded on Mars.

I'm glad you found it too! People need to be aware of the Chinese facade. Any time the China topic comes up in america people are very ignorant and seem to buy into half their propaganda

Physical is the only thing they understand. They can not be asked they must be told with re- enforcement. Treat the CCP as they treat the Chinese Citizens.

once I heard about china making a wi-fi card and they even copy the manual with all the fails in it.... then later on the china put some extra chip on it just to spy on users.....

Why would they not behave like this when the west was allowing it for decades just to get cheap wares. Just like we ignored genocide of minorities, rapes on minorities, sterilization of minorities, concentration camps for minorities. Constant breaking human rights, work conditions so severe that factories installed nets to catch roof jumpers. We ignored all of it for decades. Why would they not be bold enough to try and blatantly take measurments in a middle of the day with hundreds of witnesses when they were doing much worse with hundreds of millions of witnesses (indirect but still) that didn't react?

i hate my own country

If our security measures are so pathetic, be deserve to be stolen from until be learn.

Sour grapes taste like vinegar, anything but honey. Jealousy won’t get u anywhere except for the outhouse.!

and who has the last laugh...idiots! China is laughing all the way to space....

@@Wbliss What's the pay like? Also how's life without a soul?

@@Wbliss You stole all the tech. You can't innovate. You wouldn't have anything without the rest of the World aiding you, and you repay that aid with hostility and theft. Time is short wumao. Soon, you will not pass go, you'll not receive your 50 cents, and you'll go straight to jail ( if you're lucky ).

I heard it differently. A deportation system used in Texas called the AhSplat, named after the sound it makes. "Next!"

Bruh, time to time I have feeling that most of non-nasa space enthusiasm is only feasible as ksp mission ps elon is not different

Yes But it does get the work done, if it works why not use it. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

China has always take others tech and replicate it, until they have enough know how to make their own. You sure thats not a Chinese made Russian space suit?

@@Xotsnik Musk would kick NASA's ass at KSP. The Falcon Heavy costs a tenth of the SLS.

@@jacquesstrapp3219 still not against my coment

Here in America you get called a far right wing Trump supporter if you say something as simple as "maybe we should focus on issues here in America first before spending 40 million dollars to gender studies in Pakistan"

@@Dethflash I’ve never, ever seen that happen. That’s a popular opinion. Nobody really disagrees.

@@mockdr - The DS uses the ‘isolationist’ label against anyone opposing globalist project, and they have managed to associate that with white nationalism.

@@Dethflash shut it

Heavy communications were to prevent one side from thinking the other side launch a preemptive nuclear first strike. I do not think heartfelt cooperation was the motive.

@@paperburn It still worked. Cooperation is still a great way to make progress.

@@Punishthefalse TRue that

we defiantly did not blow each other up😌

@@paperburn sometimes that's all you can ask for

Orbiter not orbitor.

The fact remains that the LRO can monitor Chinese landings on the far (not dark) side of the Moon. It's silly to think that the Chinese can do anything they want there without being seen.

He simply copied the source from China.

Normally, it is "Taikong" (太空), meaning "Space", then add "-naut" to it.

Indeed a very slick and accurate dis. Flipping 'naut' into 'nought' with nought a pause. Reminds me of Letterkenny wordplay. 👏

@@ninacohen5401 not sure what you mean, Samantha Cristoforetti, and some other European Space Agency astronauts are drilling their Chinese.

@@hanfucolorful9656 yeah. He took the Chinese word and used it to mock them. Genius.

That's what shame cultures get you.

Nah, not in Russia.

@@kiddhkane nah with russia too, remember that big scary high tech army.

I'd argue it’s the slogan of the modern world: Perception is Reality.

Maybe one day in the not too distant future radical Islamic Cessna Pilots from Xinjiang will demolish some Chinese skyscrapers too? Tee-Hee-Hee, optics over substance, Tee-Hee Hee-Hee-Hee...

You are still under illusion that you live in democracy?

Is Ukraine a "Democracy"?

@@thornekontos1560 Yeah it might have some corruption issues but its still a democracy.

The US also has things to hide.

Yes, I am actually surprised they admitted the latest failure.

They heard that the moon landing was faked and figured they'd copy that idea too

Sieg Zeon!

Yep that rocket taking off at the start off the video looks very suspect indeed.

hehe don't tell the masses

@Neal nasa always wins, hollywood basements can spare some render farms.

While they may not be brilliant or inventive by nature individually, the Chinese people do tend to be very dedicated and cooperative, with a strong work ethic. So they tend to achieve amazing things together ... much like a colony of ants does.

@@paulrybarczyk5013 Search for Chinese commercial airplane manufacturing. Watch the videos and read the comments. First of all the videos go from a proud "look what we did" tone to a defensive, even angry tone. That is the videos, it is not like they had a chance to read the feedback before they finished the video. They protests' too much. THEN, read the comments. They are laughable. And if you understand avionics at all, take a good look at the airframe design, and they instrumentation. They are 737 MAX airplanes. If you were going to pick a plane to copy, ask yourself, for PR reasons alone, why would you copy the MAX?

@@brooks-e8249 Designing and building airliners requires inventive brilliance, even if you have one to copy. So I'm not surprised at the results you described.

Chinese tech is working, so still a huge milestone and cost-cutting method. Second mover advantage

@@paulrybarczyk5013 I agree, but just like all high tech, the devil is in the details. It is one thing to follow a design plan, even if done to perfection, and yes you have to have brains to do so, but trouble shooting and redesigning issues that may become less than stellar is where the concerns are. If you were the one who made the plane, you will have a much better idea of the issues and where to deal with them. i used the MAX as an example for a reason, the knuckleheads at Boeing used a software solution to override an issue that could be caused by a pilot if the AOA was too steep because the engines had to be set so far forward, it was a nightmare, people died, and that was horrific, no excuses, but what if they did not have any clue why the plane was pitching forward? This would have been an exponentially bigger problem.

Yep like the argonauts

Serpents only tell his side right wing mainstream narrative that China sucks, i dont know China but this guys narrative has some trouma, sponsored western view and I don't buy it.

China wasn’t in the space race to begin with. It barely left earth

NON of them ever left "low Earth orbit as far as we go" according to Nasa. Unless you think Nasa is lying. Maybe your smarter than the monkeys at nasa eh?😂😭

Why do you support the Ukraine?

@@1mol831 Mars mission Tianwen-1 ring a bell?, that is way more than lower earth orbit.

And you can name exactly ONE that has the resources and track record to show it can COMPETE with the Chinese Space Program. That company is Space X, which, if Starship works, will have officially eclipsed every country and Space Program in the world. Name the others, and I'll knock them down. Blue Origin for instance, is so far behind on all its promises as to be a joke: founded two years before Space X it has yet to actually reach orbit and pictures of New Glenn are rather scarce. And it has one of the richest men on the planet funding it, so that is not the problem. I love Rocketlab, but they are only now working on a small intermediate power rocket and still haven't finished their initial reuse research. In short, I think you are talking out of your ass.

@@remo27 Why did you just skip over ULA? That company makes some of the biggest, most reliable, rockets of all time, with the Atlas V being a reliable, very frequently used, heavy launch vehicle, and the Delta IV one of the most powerful and reliable rockets to date, plus with the coming up Vulcan centaur which has not yet launched. SpaceX does not compete with the Chinese space program, they completely blow the Chinese space program out of the water in just about every way when it comes to rockets. Rocket lab is not just “experimenting” with reusability, they have already successfully reused the first stage, and already have had multiple low cost non-reused launches. That does not to include the future plans for Neutron, a mostly reusable heavy launcher. Another company, Virgin orbit (not virgin galactic) has already has several successful trips to orbit at a very low cost. 3 more companies, Firefly, Relativity space, and Astra, however, these company’s are almost at successful launch and reuse, not quite. So yea, maybe not 4 companies that beat the Chinese space program, but nearly.

@@andrewdoesyt7787 Anyway, while I am happy that so many small launch providers seem like they might succeed at this or that , the key word is SMALL. Like the US governments real ambitions in space (small and very constrained for 50 years now if you base it on actual funding rather than speeches and always years in the future NASA promises) these are not yet ...and may never be... serious competitors to anyone. China says it plans big things in space and so far DOES seem to be putting effort and money where its mouth is. IF the US wasn't full of corrupted congress critters who tend to use NASA as a jobs program and to distribute largess to various states and contractors we perhaps would utilize our private companies more and overly expensive and pork ridden rockets to nowhere like the SLS wouldn't be built, and then the Chinese would be way behind us. We could have used modified Falcon Heavy's 3 or 4 years ago and landed a person on the moon and began the process of constructing a base. Ask yourself why Congress didn't go down THAT path?

@@andrewdoesyt7787 ULA isn't a threat and its accomplishments mostly amount to overpriced non-reusable rockets funded by the US Government and based on the same old technology as every other company for fifty years until Space X began shaking things up. It's in short, a US Government crony corporation that for years had a monopoly on US launches but couldn't compete in the world market and was made up of two legacy defense contractors space divisions, neither of which seems very ambitious when it comes to space. There's a reason they consolidated and it was partly because they didn't believe they could make big money in the Space Biz but they could make some guaranteed quid if they had a Govt monopoly on our launches.If it wasn't for Bruno it would have no credibility at all. Delta IV is being retired soon. They have a total of 3 or 4 rockets for the remaining missions and plan to build no more. Vulcan is reliant on BLUE ORIGIN for its engine, an engine that has been delayed for multiple years already. I like the ACES upper stage (IF they ever do it) and the rocket is dipping its toe into reuse with an engine they plan to catch with a helicopter, but thats still n ot enough to catch up to Space X, and they are already way behind schedule with that rocket.

@@remo27 Yet, ULA still makes bigger and higher payload rockets than any Chinese rocket, I don’t really know how much Chinese rockets cost because their isn’t much information on it, but they also are non-reusable, plus no ULA rockets crash into villages. And by the way while yes, the Vulcan engines will be from blue origin, they will be reused after being caught from the air, which will greatly reduce cost. the body won’t be reused though. Anyways, I don’t think the Falcon Heavy by itself can take people to the moon, it’s not big and powerful enough, the Saturn V was much bigger and more powerful. And one of my biggest points are, the Chinese rockets are not reusable nor have a very high payload, China’s most powerful rocket, the CZ-5B has a equal payload to the falcon 9 single booster, and it’s also not reusable, and if they falcon 9 expended the booster, it would be like double.

Yup... Ninguna potencia Occidental ha ayudado al desarrollo de China. Nadie. Nunca. Más bien todo lo opuesto. A China la han obstaculizado y amenazado por sus éxitos. Incluso con mucha PROPAGANDA en su contra. La Propaganda Occidental (USA), nos ha hecho suponer que China es un "Estado Fallido y Represor". Pero no es así. Es todo lo contrario al Fracaso. Por donde quiera que se aprecie, aquí en China se ve la Libertad con “Progreso y Crecimiento”. China es un país fantástico. Su pueblo es único en muchos sentidos. Esta nación es ancestral, pero en serio Muy Ancestral. China es 2,000 años más antigua que el Imperio Romano. Los Romanos ya desaparecieron y los Chinos siguen vigentes como pueblo, aferrados a su enorme Herencia Cultural. Gracias a esto, los Chinos han superado cantidad de broncas internas. Las más severas iniciaron en el siglo XVIII y terminaron en el siglo XX, cuando su territorio fue ocupado por 6 potencias europeas (más Japón), que la destrozaron, la corrompieron, y la envilecieron con Opio. Aún y toda la ruina y decadencia que padecieron, ellos sobrevivieron. Pese a guerras y más guerras, resistieron. Mire acá: Apenas iniciado el siglo XX, entre los años 1911-1949, hubieron: --Revolución de Xinhai, con el fallido Golpe de Estado del nuevo Imperio ("Muera Qing Manchú. Viva el Nuevo Han"). --Segunda revolución de Xinhai. --Guerra de Unión para la protección nacional en contra de las potencias extranjeras. --Las luchas internas de los "Señores de la Guerra" en China. --Guerra de Otoño de 1927. Luego: --Primer Frente Unido. Expedición al Noroeste. --Protección contra el Imperio de Japón en la Segunda Guerra Mundial. --Segundo Frente Unido. --Segunda Guerra Civil China. ¡Tremendo desgaste! Después de 38 años de guerras continuas, les llegó la "Gran Hambruna" (1959-1961). El "Gran Salto Adelante", de Mao. Con una mortandad de casi 2 millones de Chinitos. Aunque la Propaganda nos ha hecho creer que se murieron de hambre 10 millones. Como si 2 millones no fuese una cantidad terrible. ¡Horrorosa! En fin. Sigo: En 1971, y según la OCDE, China ocupaba el lugar 44 de las economías mundiales. Ya para 1999, China estaba en el quinto puesto. En tan sólo tres décadas, China había logrado sacar de la pobreza a 800 millones de Chinos. Semejante hazaña se logró con TRABAJO y con DISCIPLINA. Hoy, China ocupa el segundo lugar... y esto lo consiguieron sin atacar a nadie, sin tirar un maldito cañonazo, sin Robar ni recursos ni territorios, sin invadir, y sin romperle las pelotas a sus vecinos. Con todo lo dicho, ¿acaso no es para hacerles a ellos una reverencia de reconocimiento? China es un país admirable. China pasó de la "Gran Hambruna" a súper potencia en 30 años. En seguida, puso en órbita su propia Estación Espacial construida en tan sólo 20 meses, para luego poner a 6 robots avanzados sobre la superficie de Marte. Una proeza increíble que se consiguió sin fastidiar a nadie. Sin meterse con nadie. ¡Ah! Pero a Occidente (USA), no le gustó nada de lo que China había logrado. Por lo tanto, para el año 2002, se preparó una campaña de PROPAGANDA (Recuerda la campaña de Propaganda contra Irán: "Armas de Destrucción Masiva", ¿del 2003? Pues igual con China) ... Propaganda para convencernos de que en China se esclavizaba; de que se traficaba con órganos infantiles; de que no se respetaban los Derechos Humanos ni los Derechos Civiles. (¡Jáh! Sí, como no). Convencernos de que en la “Gran Hambruna” murieron de hambre 10 millones, luego que 25 millones, después que fueron 100. ¡Carajo! Como si casi 2 millones de Chinos muertos por hambre no fuera un número espantoso. La Propaganda buscaba escandalizar, pero, en las Olimpiadas de Beijín 2008, todo eso, se derrumbó por la fuerza de los Hechos Verificables. Incluso hoy, intentan convencernos de que China, muy pronto, colapsará económicamente. Pues no se mira cómo, porque a veinte años después del inicio de las campañas difamatorias, vemos que China no ha parado de crecer. Su Clase Media es saludable y con movilidad en ascenso. Y en vez de irse a la baja, China repunta para ocupar el primer lugar de las Economías Mundiales. Lo dicho aquí, es una Verdad Absoluta y no Propaganda. China no ROBA ni territorios ni recursos a nadie. China no interfiere en los asuntos internos de ninguna nación. China no es ni Imperialista ni Colonialista. Mucho menos es Expansionista. China, ni siquiera en 1,000 años ha invadido a nadie en el mundo. Nunca. ¡Eso Jamás lo ha hecho! ¿Sabe usted cuántas Bases Militares tiene China fuera de su propio territorio? Ninguna. Cero. ¡Nada! China no ataca. China es un país respetuoso con todos, y es un ejemplo para todo el mundo. En cambio, Estados Unidos en apenas 250 años como nación, han “Crecido” 711 veces el tamaño de su territorio, partiendo de sus 13 colonias originales. EU tiene casi 800 Bases Militares esparcidas por todo el planeta. De esas 800, los EU tienen 93 Bases frente a China. Y es ¡AQUÍ! aquí mismo en donde está el problema con los Estados Unidos frente a China: Su Miedo. ¡Su Gran Miedo! Dado que el Imperio yanqui se construyó gracias a la Piratería, a la Esclavitud, al Genocidio, al Asesinato de Líderes de Gobierno, al Tráfico de Opio y de Cocaína; al ROBO de materias primas por la entrega y la debilidad de muchas naciones soberanas sometidas, ellos le temen al Crecimiento de China. Le temen, porque piensan que China se comportará del mismo modo que los Estadounidenses. Y no. China NO es lo mismo que EU. Para China el “Progreso y Crecimiento”, se logra con trabajo y no subyugando ni avasallando a los demás. “Progreso y Crecimiento” se trata de alcanzar un Futuro mejor. Se trata de que la gente viva bien, sin hambre, sin ignorancia y sin pobreza. Y eso, se puede conseguir, así, como lo están haciendo los Chinos como pueblo y como Gobierno: Sin Joder a Nadie en el exterior. Y sin Reprimir las Libertades Civiles en su interior… aún y cuando la Propaganda quiera convencernos de lo contrario.

They think it's made of cheese another food source LOL. I know Chinese don't eat cheese all that much at least my adopted asian family doesn't I married a woman from Taiwan born in Huan China

Of course it's part of china, it's in their sky almost every night, that makes it theirs, right?:)

Asians cant handle lactose well

I remember teaching a handful of 11Bs how to orient their map with my Boy Scout compass while doing field testing at Hohenhels in 1992... as a civilian contractor... The E3s and E4s hadn't been taught, and the retired E8 who was the DOD civilian rep didn't know, and was placing entirely too much reliance on a wonky GPS receiver that could be off by up to 100m, depending on the number of satellites overhead. (1992 GPS tech wasn't all that great, and the constellation of satellites wasn't complete at the time) Some days, I'd have a former Cav scout assigned to the crew, and he was pretty good with map & compass skills. The Army is *supposed* to teach LANDNAV (mostly map & compass), but sometimes they fall a little short

@@jimness5902 tofu

USA in 1969 knew the odds was 50/50 of death, willing to take it as to win the cold war. China is not willing to take those odds today, as no country is. China cares about the pride of Chinese life, that is the reason they have zero covid policy, as with a U.S rate they would had 2.4Million dead.

Yup, the Soviets had a real value for human life. 😂

@@fatasssquirrel1731 - About as much as the U.S. government with about 95% of all drone attack causalities being on innocent civilians not to mention the untold other civilian murders by military forces (with them even go as far at times as planting weapons on dead civs to justify their deaths which was a thing in Afganistan).

@@fatasssquirrel1731 Outside of putting political dissidents into gulags and sanitariums for criticizing the State - In certain ways, yes. Soviet submarines had escape pods, strangely enough… but their reactors were poorly shielded. Big oof lol

Vladimir Komarov would like a word with you…

Copy-paste as usual then they manage it

Getting into space is one thing. Getting them back safely is another. Chiy-nah was also making noises about going to the moon and establishing a base there. Wonder if they'd bring their earth building standards with them.

No joke i bought one of those p38 can openers that ended up being chinese made, and it couldnt even make a dent in the can.

Low tech isn't important for them, it's the national incentive to get the space stuff done well that is different here than the basic cutlery and electronics made in the sweat shops.

LOL china have a very bad, "Close enough" syndrome.

he isn't a journalist, this channel is for fear-mongering, lol... too many facts would just get in the way

@@WhatIfTrayvonMartinHadAGun to be fair. The correction is more of a technicality. While we do have LRO there. It has a maximum resolution of 1 meter, and China’s Chang’e rovers are about that size. So it can’t get a good look at what they’re doing anyway. It can barely make out the remnants of our old Apollo sites. So the idea that we can’t really see what the Chinese missions are doing is practically still true. At least as far as the information that’s public and unclassified

Is that what recorded that rocket that hit the moon recently?

@@gsrcrxsi Excellent point, and the reason for not being complacent about what the Chinese are doing, both down here and up there.

Even the term 'dark side of the moon' is wrong. Of course, the sun shines there, too. Therefore, one should always speak of the back side of the moon.

The boats and snipers on hainan resort are So annoying

Communist Party of China

lol !

The chinese also watch those online "go fund me" type projects and steal the ideas from them, patent them up, and take over the market with their knock offs of the clever idea that got steamrolled by the chinese patent and copyright pirates.

its a relatively common occurrence for people to discover cheap chinese knockoffs of things they have invented being sold online or in stores in the US and the only thing they can do is contact the US distributor and get them to stop selling them, but another distributor can pick up where the other one left off and sell them as well until they are ordered to stop doing so, its even likely the same people would just register a new company under a different name and do it again, but beyond that china will not enforce anything and its likely that the CCP is involved

Chinese companies couldn’t care less.

“Thus says the Lord: ‘Cursed be the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the Lord’” (Jeremiah 17:5).

yeah, China is doing excellent. 🇨🇳

@@commentfreely5443 exodus 29:7 2) cover yourself in oil

@@bloopahVIII hey man, covering yourself in oil is a huge flex on the poors, what with oil prices as high as they are right now I mean this totally ignores how this was a legitimate ancient hygiene practice that worked, but you also ignored that when you referenced it

Made in China hardly lasts

Not a china fan. But I don't really think those things are "cheap"and "looks cheap". They just looks like space suits. And almost all the expensive stuffs are also mostly made in china these days. They produce both cheap stuffs and expensive stuffs.

Sir Sir, Thats just a matter of perspective. TO china it's "Close Enough"

@@dinil5566 Did you see the Boots? Some Farmers are missing their Muck Boots.

Sadly a viet dry cleaner in sf bay area did something similar to a custom tailored suit jacket…probably did it on purpose because he was jealous of the suit I had

reminds me of one episode of family guy when peter tray taking his clothes from a chinese dry cleaning

Chinnese would never admit their mistake. Never.

In India for same situation, dry cleaner will say sorry and we move on though frustrated😂

That's just dry cleaners the world over.

the reason is that it is communist, but it will fall just like any other tyranny in history... well hopefully. hopefully the people don't stay ignorant forever and never revolt

..

China is the most backward country in the world. We should worry about Endia's technology. Endia is the smartest in the world!

If it works it works. China is making it work

This is a big deal among American policymakers when it comes to the whole stealing-technology thing. US-PRC space cooperation mostly ended in the early 2000s* following a certain incident. Most Chinese orbital rockets (and all at the time) are based on obsolete Soviet ICBM technology and use the highly toxic UDMH fuel as the *main propellent* for their first stages**. Basically, what happened is that a rocket veered off course and exploded near the launchpad and American investigators had to scour the site seeking sensitive components (because there wasn't a Chinese launch center at the time launching over the Ocean). Unfortunately, they didn't have any PPE on hand, so their eyeballs bulged out in the process. (I'm pretty sure the injuries were temporary, but they must've been painful). That incident, by the way, killed at least half a dozen Chinese citizens (probably more). *Except impromptu joint ops by space probes that happen to be going the same place but weren't necessarily planned to do so. Also, it's my understanding that NASA's LRO and MRO moon and mars satellites played a significant role it the selection for CNSA's landing site selection for their landers and rovers. **nearly all spacecraft use hydrazine for maneuvering thrusters, but it's extremely uncommon as a principle propellent in the rockets themselves, only Russia's ancient Proton rocket does that outside of China.

GPS is used for calibration as the inertial guidance can sometimes drift off course. But redundant systems help keep things working even if the other's jammed.

@@triadwarfare Yeah but they actually don't need it. It would have a very slight error at best. While the additional accuracy would be nice it's by no means necessary. People I'm very close to worked on these systems at Northrup Grumman for the Black Hawk helicopter back in 2001-2003. I'd assume by now they're widespread throughout the military at this point. The military was always worried precisely about GPS going down and navigation needed to be reliable even without GPS. It's nice to have a backup, but GPS is mostly a redundant navigation method for navigation systems. Losing a meter or two of accuracy is probably the worst that could happen by taking GPS offline.

That rules. He knows that if GPS ever fails for any reason (during war or peace time), the people who know how to navigate with maps and compasses will rule the seas (and the land?).

If there was, I can't imagine it will do a great deal to harm us. To really use the Moon for a useful military purpose, you'd need the ability to fire nuclear warheads from the Moon using a railgun. This is something that is far beyond their current capabilities in terms ot payload to the Lunar surface.

Of course there was. The US does the same thing all the time, though. Sending up military payloads secretly or alongside civilian ones.

@@InfiniteMonkeysSA I wouldn't say _all_ the time. Occasionally there is a secret payload, but because civilians can track it, we know when one is snuck on a normal mission. Then there's stuff like the X-37 spaceplane, where we don't know all the details of its mission, but it's very obviously meant for military purposes.

@Wasatch Wind most of the shuttle flights were military.

NASA Lunar Reconaissance orbiter can observe literally any part of the Moon, visible or hidden side, doesnt matter. Additionally, Moon is a dead space rock, exploitation of its resources should be encouraged and welcomed as it can help us to become more independent from Earth's resources and allow us to build space stations and colonies from lunar resources that would be absurdly easier to lift into orbit. If China was able to build an actual lunar colony that could mine and process ores, it would be its greatest historical achievement by a wide margin, and you would not hear about anything else, it would be constant front page news. However, China's current space capabilities are comparable to Soviet space capabilities in the 1970s, if anyone manages to build a Moon base it will be a joint NASA and ESA project with SpaceX reusable superheavy lift rockets.

From "up there" i would think you can watch what what the US claims are? And what they do about them?

Taiwan is a part of china get over it.

@@arnehofoss9109 this makes no sense, can you elaborate?

@@redstoneddad3981 the commenter's display name he's replying to is "good view from up here"

@@ffwast oh gotcha, ty 😊

It's same for USA too, difference is they did it years ago

@@karmaisntreal Yep, it's also aimed at the USA.

I'm going outside right now and show them THE FINGER 🖕🏻

Hopefully.

@@2hotflavored666 Good.

Why for the most time?

@@Shadowwalker1717 I’m answering for only myself, but my experience has been that they are not competent in the projects they join in upon, they are pathological liars and are wildly unprepared (incompetence again) combined with lying about their actual experience and capabilities. They will also lie about being Taiwanese, or “being from” Taiwan. Utterly untrustworthy in every way imaginable, as well as delivering an inferior product that doesn’t meet the agreed upon specifications.

FTFY: Not "a". THE Big Brother of the world.

It is good to see some people knowledgeable about spaceflight here. I do not desire to praise China, but I want to at least ensure accuracy.

Thank you! How does he make a video about space and not know about LRO??!

I have seen much of the footage and it does not come close to the amount of footage or quality coming from the Russians or Americans. In fact most of the footage is very difficult to make out except for inside the space station. Maybe they don't want to show to much detail but it is still very sketchy.

To be fair, to be honest

@@rickjames18 maybe it's sketchy but if you think that they haven't achieved landing on the moon excetera, all of their missions have been acknowledged by NASA

Who cares if China got helped from Russia, US got helped from Nazi Germany scientists. Foreigners contributed a lot to the US' developments.

SO, even the space technology of China is copied shit? Pathetic.

China builds, USA bombs

China lifted 300 million people out of poverty. All I see in America is our corporate government working on putting 300 million people in poverty

From what I've heard of North Korea's missiles, they are not capable of doing anything useful. They exist simply to threaten Japan with them once a week. North Korea _can_ afford to feed its people. It just doesn't. It instead spends the national budget on ICBMs that can't go anywhere, enormous mega-hotels covered in LED screens that never get finished, disgustingly expensive farming initiatives that fail miserably from horrendous management (but blame it on the farmers, and execute them for not meeting quota when their harvests are all stolen in transit by corrupt officials), and surreal, fantastical utopian cities where absolutely nobody lives. Nearly all food in North Korea is imported. Most family homes have their own vegetable gardens in order to not starve. Modern North Korea makes the Soviet Union look like the Garden of Eden. But at least they don't have dystopian re-education camps and forced sterilization, or turn into a rabid lynch mob when someone acknowledges the existence of South Korea.

To be fair, the DPRK's rockets tend to explode before really getting anywhere, and it is still very much in doubt that they've managed to miniaturize a nuclear warhead to fit, much less actually work.

Not disagreeing but could you list the 4 other examples?

@@usedtoberyanpoopnownormal8822 Speaking from a post-WWII context and being incredibly reductive, DPRK: Repulsive Japan: Peaceful India: Middling (economically, for a long time) USA/USSR: Bellicose DPRK: Bellicose CCP: Bellicose EU: ... Respectful?

Nothing more to expect from a communist dictatorship

Japan had learned from what had happened between the US and China. When they signed the trade agreements instead of buying directly from the West they made deals to manufacture the goods under license from the Western companies thus empowering their own population and developing their own technical base to not only copy but to (in certain aspects) surpass the original technologies. That's how they became powerful enough to become a World Power in such a short time. With China they have slowly been regaining their previous World Power position but their economy is in danger of self destructing due to over stimulation without the structure to maintain long term growth. And China is not without rampant political corruption at the highest levels of their system. Keep in mind the long history of China and that the political revolutions historically came from the lower classes when the corruption of the governing powers became intolerable.

Comparing China to Japan is amusing at best. China would need to get rid of the CCP first, FULL STOP. Then China may, in five or so decades, come close to where the Japanese were in 1960. Copying others and stealing their IP and hard work isn't going to make China like Japan. Japan didn't copy, they took something and refined it to the point of perfection. The Japanese aren't perfect especially with their shoganai mentality but they are still at least 100 years ahead of current China. The Japanese government doesn't need to tell its citizens how to behave when they travel abroad as tourists, China does and that's embarrassing to China and civilized Chinese around the world.

China doesn't want to modernize, the CCP wants to appear modern. Massive difference

@@chriscutress1702 Eloquently put. I know I didn't include a great deal of details with the analogy of Japan, (honestly too much to cover for a short youtube comment) At least we can be sure that the future is likely going to get interesting. Here's to hoping mistakes will be learned this go around.

So much nonsense, short to respond. Japan is not a "successful" country, as a little brother of the US, it lacks full autonomy economically, militarily and politically. In fact, the JPN economy was brought down by US in the 1990s, as the "Plaza Agreement" was signed before. And now Japan's economy... as an export country, Japan even has a trade deficit now, which is the biggest tragedy for it. Japan will have a lower sense of existence in the world in the future, its highlight moment is in the second half of the 20th century~

How so? I saw it all and he never says how they just lost the space race.. It's a disgusting clickbait

I'm from Brazil and really mad about the disregard for our space program. Having to rely on other nations to launch our satellites is a high risk for soberany.

Don't be disappointed. Science fiction often precedes science fact.

Oh we shall someday see such great wonders, I am certain. And even our efforts preceding that can be just as magnificent. There is a very different feeling in looking at elaborate science fiction art, and then seeing real images from James Webb.

Good boy 4 yo

I so badly want to land on Jupiter☺️. That would be so nice❤️

In science fiction stories we had communicators like in Star Trek. And now we have cell phones with brain draining social media

So you saw it?

Sure you do.

@@dylannymer1003 You can believe in whatever conspiracies you want, it ain't going to change reality.

@@dylannymer1003 I find that you can never underestimate the U.S intelligence Complex's addiction to sneak spy cameras into places that you think they won't be there.

I thought we had satellites orbiting the moon, too.