@@Mike_Hawk1 GAWD DAMN READ THE FIRST AMENDMENT YOU FLACCID BASEMENT WANKER. Freedom of speech doesn't apply here🤦🏼♀️ EDUCATION, READING, COMPRESSION, RESEARCH First Amendment applies only to state actors, there is a common misconception that it prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, including private, non-governmental entities. The Supreme Court has determined that protection of speech is not absolute NOW YOU KNOW🙄
@_Turtle_420 wrong about what? There's no proof to any of this horse shit on the other hand the largest populations of the world are circumcised so clearly their dicks work. If anything, there's scientific, logical and real problems that uncircumcision raises, including hygiene (bacterial infection not just for men but women they have intercourse with). Also a friend of mine told me that the uncircumcised actually have flabby dicks which created the whole joke that white people have limp dicks on topic of size you do know genetics(seen a uncircumcised Puerto Rican have smaller dick than circumcised white males), being overweight and other factors weigh far more than a snip at the tip.
Little known fact : If you ever lose your eyelids in an accident, you can use the intact foreskin of the genitals as a skin graft. The downside is that it can leave you a little cockeyed. 😵💫
Damn, and I thought my large circular stretch mark from them removing too much was bad. I hope when the technology gets good enough to fix us they prioritize you.
Damn man that sucks, especially when this procedure can be done on babies. Having your penis mutilated and not being able to do anything about it sounds horrible.
yeah , depending on what state you are in you MIGHT be able to file a medical malpractice claim, a botched procedure like that would probably qualify, it depends on the statute of limitations (how long after a surgery you can claim malpractice) on malpractice cases wherever you live though. some states (this is US centric advice btw lol) also allow you to sue a certain amount of years after discovery even if the post operation statute has expired. For example in Maryland the statute is 5 years after surgery but 3 years after the discovery OF the issue so you could still sue after the 5 years are up I believe.
I'm so sorry. I once saw one that looked like a chunk had been nearly severed and then healed back on the wrong way. Like, the flesh was still there, but adhered to the side of the head instead of put back where it belonged? I was teenager at the time and I think that was when it clicked for me, "WTF are they doing to babies?!" almost every circ'd 🍆 I see has complications. They're just normalized, so they don't get lumped into the fraudulent statistics which claim circ lowers risk of complications. I guess if you don't consider keratinization of the glans, adhesions and loss of sensation to be complications then yeah, uncirc have it way worse 🙄
Humans survived successfully for thousands of years prior to this horrific practice. There is absolutely NO REASON to circumcise a healthy male who does not present excessive fusing or deformation. I refused circumcision for my son. I have been asked by many, why I didn't have him cut. I say, if it isn't broke, it doesn't need fixing. If he feels the need to shed his flesh when he gets older, he can do it on his own. As for religious convictions... my son's relationship with God is his own. If he is denied because of a decision I made, then that's not much of a God, if you ask me.
@@Ocorydonthejester - I'm sorry she didn't see things clearly. My own father wasn't cut, yet my mother INSISTED on my circumcision. I never understood why nature was good enough for her choice of husband, but not for her son 🤦♂️
@fonzworthbentley7455 - indeed, they have... but it doesn't prove the practice to be any more necessary. As a matter of fact, on most cases, it is absolutely UNNECESSARY... an unnecessary surgical procedure which actually presents the subject to a greater risk of infection. Except in cases of atypical fusion, circumcision should not be performed... plain and simple. Furthermore, insurance companies shouldn't be paying for a practice which is well over 90% cosmetic.
My homie’s doctor cut too much when he was circumcised as a baby and he told me he used to cry cause it hurt so bad when he got a boner💀 mfs doctor nerfed him
I used to see this all the time on twitter part of the reason I left it. The idiots aren't the one who make this kind of content but the ones who believe it so easily without critiquing it
My son was born 48 years ago in a small town in Germany at an old hospital. When I brought him home, he was not circumcised nor do I recall the hospital staff asking me about the procedure. I read that Germany is a non-circumcising country and the procedure is done mostly for health or religious reasons. I found out years later that the procedure is routinely done in the US. My son never talked to me about this issue nor do I want to know. That’s his private business. In retrospect, it does seem that a baby’s circumcision is kind of barbaric. Why not let the youngsters decide, once they’re older, if they want the procedure or not. Just saying. 🤷♀️
Yeah, I'm Brazilian and was circumcised as an infant, I got some complications and needed a few surgeries since then to correct the issues, and I have a lot of scars from them. I am totally against circumcisions, specially on infants.
Circumcision in adults is much more invasive and complicated. Sensitivity is also decreased a lot whereas if circumcised as an infant, boys gain almost 100% sensitivity throughout years of development. Plus, hygiene, yes that’s right, hygiene.
@@catsaresocute650same goes with trans. Either both or none EDIT: I'm sorry if i confused anyone here i only mean surgery on intersex newborns who just get assigned a gender which often times wont match their hormones later in life.
@@karyon1007I don’t think anyone says anything against medically necessary procedures, but most circumcisions happen as unnecessary medical procedures on minors because of religious or other social reasons of the parents (sometimes even „beauty standards“ like „our son should look like his dad“).
I cannot imagine someone leaving the gross, unnecessary skin on just because it is natural. It is like leaving in the appendix because it has some uses.
@NoahLange337 I just think it proper that the person it's being done to be capable of consenting to it. When I say "circumcision," I guess I meant to say "infant circumcision." It's a bit like infant baptism: what does it really accomplish?
The only reason I got circumcised was that it is easier and way less painful to clean. It also looks better and the skin is not needed. + how would the kid understand the benefits and negatives? Even a 12 year old cannot, and any older it gets harder and scars are left. Infant circumcision is the best in my opinion
@NoahLange337 That's my issue, though: the infant can't understand any better than the 12-year-old, and putting an infant through surgery that isn't strictly medically necessary (and is somewhat cosmetic) is a bit risky. It'd be a bit like removing the appendix at infancy; this would certainly prevent inflammation of the appendix farther down the line, but infant surgery is always extremely risky. Personally, I was circumcised, and my only issue was that it was done without my ability to consent. I'll spare you the details, but I think I prefer having been circumcised to not having been circumcised. I just think the difficulties presented at later age circumcision are worth it compared to the risks and lack of consent at infancy, but parents who do this are not bad parents by any means.
@@NoahLange337Bro is mad he lost his hoodie :D It's not considered gross anywhere else in the world you should really rethink this. It's harmful and fucking weird to mutilate childrens genitals
Yeah, and some people have to get their legs amputated for medical reasons as well. Should routine leg amputation be considered so no one ever has to worry about leg problems in the first place?
@@markjackson1989 Circumcision and limb amputation are HUGE DIFFERENCES. If both of the procedures are EXACTLY the same thing then circumcised penis should removed the head of the penis if you compare it to the leg. There is absolutely NO amputation in circumcised penis. It’s ONLY removing the skin without touching the actual penis. If it was done with the leg. You’re only be removing the skin of the leg without chopping off the leg. Circumcision and amputation are two different procedures. Completely different and nothing to do with each other. You’re only losing the skin not the whole sexual organ. It still works exactly like any other penis while amputated leg will never work since you completely remove it. I don’t understand people who can’t tell the difference between circumcising and amputating
There have been plenty of moms who went natural and their baby boy got massive infections because it just can’t be cleaned properly so they circumcised their baby. The boy can still pee well and have normal fertility.
I mean I don't like the cultural nose piercing I was given as a baby but I decided not to be a drama queen about it. Get over yourself. It literally doesn't harm your sexual life in ANY way. Except if it is botched ofc
As a male who is uncircumcised I met a woman who either watches too much porn or legitimately never experienced an uncircumcised. Though I took care of my glans from my mother's advices since I was a child, the woman's face showed disgust. I ended the night, was a bit self conscious but got over it, because I am no where desperate to cut off a skin to fit someone's standards. Either I interacted with a one of kind woman, my advice to the boys, don't get circumcised unless you're medically required to or for some reason you want to as long as it's your own choice. Edit: This is my first liked post...and it refers to my privates, not sure what to say to that but I been reading the replies due to the increase amount of notifications. Thank you for those encouraging me not to feel shame for what I have. Though I gotten over it as during the encounter I was young and inexperienced. I'm doing much better now, overcame my problem, finding another and thinking back, it just seems miniscule to worry. Other than that I wish y'all best of luck on your rocky adventures and never let another person's meaningless body shaming affect your mentality of you being you. Whether circumcised or uncircumcised, always be true to yourself. 🤙Hang in there and thank you again, just to clarify I downplayed the encounter as its a bit personal to my younger self, she was rude and I was glad to end the night
Yeah if that’s what she really cared about Im glad the night ended just like that I was born with one for a fucking reason and quite honestly it’s mutalation
I'm sorry to hear she reacted that way. To be completely fair, that's not entirely her fault. Think of how boys, circumcised or not, feel when they first learn that there's a whole other group of boys out there with or without surgically altered genitals.
@@guacre2675 I fully understand, I did some time doing my own research after what I felt was a humiliation to me. I genuinely thought most guys in the US were the same but come to my surprise most males in the US are circumcised according to most websites. Though I been born in another country, this is a new thing to me. There's seems to be a belief that circumcision is a Healither and is a requirement but gladly that belief is waning. There's also wierd radical idea that it makes your junk bigger which is a weird misinformation...neither less I hope no males don't have the experience of another showing disgust to their junk regardless of circumcised or not like I did. It's a wierd topic to bring cos I can control the decision to be circumcised but I am no where willing to do the action for another to be accepted
She should t have been rude about it but honestly this happens to me. I had never seen anything like that and wasn't forewarned. So when I got down there I was shocked. Not in a bad way just confused and curious. I held it for awhile and looked to understand the anatomy, what was going on. I will say I felt that it was kinda in the way, made it harder to do things but that's just my opinion 🤷 but yes maybe she didn't mean to be rude she was probably just shocked like I was
@@RedGreyV that is LITERALLY not true, I don’t know where your getting your info from but there are numerous studies that cite benefits, just take 2 seconds to look it up, I hope you know how to find trusted sources they should’ve taught that in 3rd grade I believe.
@@ding9633 first of all the country of origin of the study doesn’t matter as long as the studies are accurate and peer reviewed. And it’s not like I agree with it and look for evidence to support it, this is just what the science tells us, the vast majority of studies say it’s either benign or gives very marginal health benefits, very little studies have found anything wrong with circumcision, and what they have found is also marginal. Just do your research, but given your comment I doubt you understand how to.
@@do.notdisturb While the side effects are numerous and common, ranging from uncomfortable to painful to life-threatening, that's not the point. There are no benefits, only downsides. Circumcising infants is not any less wrong than molesting them.
He's absolutely right. I would only elaborate by saying that for the majority of males, circumcision is not medically necessary. It's entirely cosmetic. Only if a man developes a problem where the foreskin constricts the glans will a circumcision possibly be necessary. Truth be told, people typically circumcize their male infants out of a sense of tradition, religious practice, or the misguided notion that it's more sanitary.
@@llllIlllIllI potentially. i had it myself and fixed it with stretching exercises. the only time i think it would be necessary is if you get a really bad infection. like a really really bad infection lol; nothings better to motivate to start than having to suffer through a little inflammation...
@user-dq7rx6jp6t what makes unnecessary mutilation of a child unethical? Read the question again. If you don't get it, repeat. Why would it be ethical to mutilate a child. It's not.
@user-dq7rx6jp6t you need help to understand why it is unethical to unneccesarily mutilate a child? I think you need to think carefully about the meaning of the phrase "unnecessary mutilation of a child."
For the people arguing in the comments, most of the Europe is intact and is doing just fine, there's no men dying from cancers and stds at astronomical rates. Also many later in life circumcisions happen because people are not taught how to take care of their parts properly, resulting in parents trying to forcibly detach the foreskin or nurses not being taught how to take care of infant and male genitals in general, whether on babies or on the elderly. Also it wouldn't be bad if more people watched circumsion videos, just to get informed on what's happening.
I’m having twins in a couple weeks and one of them is a boy. My grandmother, mother, and uncle have mocked me, shamed me, and tried to bully me into circumcising my son. Telling me “it’s cleaner, it looks better, he’s going to hate you if you don’t.” And I tell them the same thing every time, I have no problem teaching my son how to keep himself clean and I deem it an entirely cosmetic procedure that isn’t necessary. If he wants to be circumcised as an adult, he can make that choice.
I’m happy for your son and for your thoughtful protection of him. I can tell you that circumcision problems are not rare at all, they are in fact very common, the issue is that most men don’t make the connection back to circumcision as the cause of certain issues.
Massive respect for you! It shouldn’t be parents call on whether or not to mutilate their child’s genitals, if that’s what you child wants when their older then good for them but it should be their choice.
I can't for the life of me understand why circumcision is the norm in the US unless you're a jew. Seems insane to me as an European to have your baby undergo surgery as a newborn without a reason whatsoever. I would never do that to my son. Barbaric.
as i heard it, they pushed it pretty strongly on my mother telling her that if it stayed i would get infections and disease, and it was healthier to cut it off. so there's something weird there, either they get paid more for doing it, but the doctor was terrible for it.
I'm curious if some of it is because of how much US Healthcare costs. Like yeah they can wait and hope their boy has good hygiene and/or isn't predisposed towards complications. But if they need to pay for the procedure and antibiotics later, it's probably gonna be the price of a car.
@@Tessa_Ru "hope their boy has good hygiene" bro.. you don't just hope your kids have good habits, you TEACH them. and if someone can't clean their willy dilly 5 or 6 times a week... they nasty AS F.
It should apply to anyone and everyone. With most things anyways, I still think some vaccines should be mandatory for those that can take them without issue.
You can advocate against it without lying about it! Botched circumcisions happen and in general I believe they should only be done by the individual being circumcised’s consent!
@@JaefarSABNWfemale circumcision affects a woman’s ability to achieve pleasure and even urinate. Male circumcision simply removes excess skin around the glans penis. It does not affect ability to achieve orgasm or urinate. Major differences.
Adult circumcisions are a lot more complicated and painful than one on a child. There’s more risk involved hence why people prefer to circumcise their children before they reach the age of consent.
And in cases where it is medically necessary, why not just do it on the adult who understands the necessity? Why do it on EVERY CHILD regardless of necessity?@@melaninmonroe007
Children can't consent to what is essentially cosmetic surgery, leave them and their body parts alone until they are old enough to make the decision themselves.
@@shoeskode136yep, but that's only IF it's already infected. Women get clitoral phimosis just as often as guys, but we don't go around circumcising the clitoral hood!! And that provides the exact same function as the foreskin, if not less.
I couldn't pee well as a baby. I'm glad I couldn't consent. The removal of a basically pointless flap of skin isn't really cosmetic. Only someone that wants for such a reason can consider it as such. And Jewish people. For whatever reason their religion requires it. But I'm pretty positive 99.999% of children that get it, get it because they have complications at birth or to avoid future complications. I don't doubt some parents do force it because they want to. And that's wrong. But you can't also lump male circumsition with female circumsition which is 100% mutilation as the clitoris is removed, among what ever else they remove to subjugate, which in males would be like removing the glans of the penis along with the testicles. You can live without your foreskin and have absolutely no side effects. If done right, obviously, like any surgery, any inept doctor can botch it. I have full sensitivity and underwear doesn't bother me. Unless I go comando with jeans, that is not a fun experience lol.
@@brokenaeons1867At this day and age it's purely cosmetic unless it's specifically done to deal with Phimosis. Arguing that it helps with hygiene is like arguing that cutting of your leg has benefits against leg cramps...
Yeah, bein from a Muslim family, I got dis as a baby. I wonder how god made my body originally, how it functioned how it felt. Makin de decision consciously is better
@@HarrisGentwell tho it’s obligatory in Islam dont doubt Islam just like the umbilical cord which can still be attached to the kid but we choose to cut it off
Did you just compare umbilical cord to foreskin? :D yeah, because being connected to your mum with meat cord is same as having your skin removed@@elmo10yearsago
I can't help but wonder if people who make this their whole personality, not saying you are [I knew a friend who did] aren't just projecting other issues they had with their parents. My parents were awful, but a circumcision is the last thing I care about. In fact I chose to have my son circumcised.
But you did have a choice to make such a silly statement. Parenthood involves doing what's best for your kids, you dont need your newborns consent to give them antibiotics for an infection or perform medically beneficial procedures. That's just logically ridiculous.
@Ricardo Montanía Mutilation presumes it's left in worse condition afterwards than before, this is a routine procedure that improves and betters health. If I wasn't circumcised, I'd go get it done.
Yeah it more hygienic, ofc if you shower it gonna get clean but a circumcised one will be cleaner and will keep less bacteria at the end of the day There are also situations where some people forget to clean, due to a long day, or are just to young to clean it correctly or thinking about that, they can aslo be too old to be able to
@@jesper164a explain that to the 23,3 % of people who have infections due to it. It is not hard yes but you will not always remember cleaning it nor sometime you won't have time or you have deaseases, it's like brushing teeths, it's not hard to brush your teeth yet some situations make you unable to do it for a while which will give you teth decay, mostly on teens, old people and kids
@@dojadog1337 Why dont we just remove all our teeth then and get fake teeth/dentures? Are you just mad that you had yours removed and can't get it back? It will not get infected even for days without washing... Clearly your lack of foreskin makes you dumb on the subject. Just stop yourself.
While I know you're right, circumcision is still immoral without consent of the patient that said. Many of us never consented to having our hoodies removed.
Many of you were also trying to figure out why you were no longer in the womb when you were circumcized. It's usually done when the child is around two days old. 👶👶👶
@@Learning_new_things_70It's immoral to preform unnecessary surgeries on infants, circumcision is often medically unnecessary, most parents just do it without even knowing Why they opt to
@@dylanfooler I'm not going to say that parents should NOT opt for it since the child cannot say yes or no. But I think parents should be given ALL of the information before they agree to just do it in the hospital because the hospital pushes paperwork Infront of them...huge stack
@dylanfooler you are so un educated and ignorant if that's what you believe . No doctor can perform the procedure without fully informing parents about the procedure and the possible consequences if something goes wrong, and not every doctor is trained to perform the procedure so only select doctors who are trained can perform it but keep up with your ignorant bs .
@@Learning_new_things_70I'm absolutely going to say the parents should NOT opt to do it because the child can't say yes or no. Because it's a permanent medically unnecessary body modification, it shouldn't be done on someone who can't consent, period end of story, idgaf what the parents think. The child isn't their property, their child is their child, a little baby human that will grow to be an adult one day who should be free to make that decision if he do chooses, not have the choice ripped from him for bullshit reasons
When my wife and I were discussing this very thing with our first son, I was very much against it and it wasn't until we spoke to a pediatrician when she agreed not to do it to him. It only means hpwe had to clean a little more changing his diaper and teach him how to do it later on, which we did with all 3 of our sons. Between our 2nd and 3rd sons, I went through Paramedic school and during my clinicals I assisted in a circumcision and WOW. I would never imagine doing that to any child, theyhave a special board with straps on it to hold the child's arms, pegs and torso, then they took a hinged piece of metal that locks down on the tip, then scraps the tissue off with a scalpel, the child is cold and naked and the blood curtling scream when the doctor clamped that strument over his tip is something I will never forget, and I worked as a medic for 15 years and saw a LOTof stuff I wish I could forget.
That doesn’t like a very standard procedure, especially because it doesn’t sound like anaesthetic was used. They’ll generally use a local anaesthetic, make a small cut from the tip to the bottom of the glans and then start cutting the skin away. Then the skin gets stitched together… like the SURGEON in the video literally explained. 🤦
@@Nikelaos_Khristianos Nope, wiped it with iodine and then immediately put the clamp in place, scraped the foreskin off with the childs screaming increasing, then just placed Vaseline on the area and took him back to the nursery, no stitches, no anesthetics, about as barbaric of a procedure as you could think of in my opinion. I asked 2 different nurses about it and they both agreed that it was the standard procedure for both that hospital and 2 other area hospitals that they had worked at.
To those relating experiences with partners while uncircumcised, thank you for sharing. Male body shaming is underrepresented and I ain't tryna live in a society where calling an uncut man gross is socially acceptable, ya feel?
What I find weird is that widespread circumcision seems to be purely an American thing, in that I don't know of another country where it would be done for non-religious purposes. Here in the UK it would be much weirder if a guy was circumcised than not.
@@theparanoidandroid3583 i agree. I am american and in typical fashion I talk about society as though it is automatically known that im referencing America lol.
As an RN of 30 years who assists in this procedure daily, I have seen many gone wrong, including blood loss/uncontrolled bleeding. We are not allowed to tell the parents. My son is now close to 30 and we did not circumcise him because of my fear, the good doctors’ recommendations, & other male family members who said it was unnecessary. My son is very happy!
Religious people knpws how to do it as they do it all the time . The sausage looks good it is cleaner and more pleasure during sex . The younger the better as it heal quicker
I disagree with you, I’m grateful I got circumcised when I was a baby. It’s very hygienic for male. Plus I don’t remember anything about that experience at all.
@@andrewdavanzo8497 This talk about hygiene is a myth. We're in the modern world where we have access to water, if you shower and wash your penis there's nothing to worry about.
@@andrewdavanzo8497 If you dont have it circumcised it's normal, it should only be for religion and the reality is when the boy actually realizes what his religion is, it won't be anywhere near birth, so his parents basically choose this, which is why the commenter is saying it should be illegal.
So, if you're not okay with circumcisions, then you should be against what the transgender LOUD MINORITY are trying to do. (the silent majority are against it, thank the Lord)
ive had my circumcision when i was 7 and im still comfortable with it to this day... i do not see whats wrong with this like imagine removing something that is not needed then calling it "mutilation" grow up.
@@spod715it’s not that it’s wrong, but to preform on a baby without them giving the go ahead, is the wrong part. and im glad you’re still comfortable with yours!
@@spod715 I actually agree with those against infant circumcision, but wherever there is a gathering of this ideology, there are a bunch of buffoons that come across as if they are more concerned about not being able to coom as hard or easy at their anime waifus, than they are actually concerned about the ethicality of it all. It doesn't help when they exaggerate the negatives and undermine the positives of the procedure either. I have yet to find a truly accurate pros and cons list of circumcision in this comment section. Just people fear-mongering about how your tip is going to scar up and how it's going to fall off or how your urethra is going to close up, or how you are going to die from desensitation... If it's an ethical issue, you don't need to deceive or lie or exaggerate about it. Many people don't realize that actually diminishes their point, because it shifts the argument from that of an ethical one of choice, to that of a practical one... And it's not one that either side is going to win, because the benefits and downsides of having and not having a circumcision are largely inconsequential. If you wanna coom to anime waifus all day long instead of having the stamina to please a real woman, that is your choice. But don't project that onto the infants. Keep it ethical, not about personal regret or ire about the lost forbidden sensation that would've turned your life around and given you the ambition to become a millionaire.
While size and length are not affected, circumcision can fuck up the sensation on the glans itself, not to mention the psychological trauma since there are cultures where circumcisions are forcibly administered to children ages 8 and up. There is absolutely no need for circumcision unless you currently have a medical condition that necessitates the procedure. I was forcibly circumcised at age 12 and I still have not recovered psychologically, I also noticed the vast difference in sensation as well. IF you are reading this and have a son or are planning on having children, please DO NOT under any circumstance (except medical purposes) circumcise your child
I needed one for medical reasons but i didnt notice any difference Actually, only One, cold and hot water are a little more hurting to my fella but only for a few seconds
No it doesnt it actually give more pleasure during sex In my country we do it religiously . No men are harmed to this day nobody cries about it . They do it from a young age so they dont really remember much about it it heals quiet fast . First they do it through doctor that have years and years of experience doing it as they are religious Its more hygenic And a penis with no foreskin is way prettier There is 2 way of doing it cutting it directly wich is the old school way or using a "ring that you put on the penis and the second options is the most modern and painful one and would not do it to my child People done it for centuries and centuries So yall should respect rhose whobdo it for religious reason
Just read the comments lots of men regret it being done. Religious reasons is not a reason for doing it. Hygiene is frankly nonsense and aesthetics is subjective. It should be outlawed for children. There were many things that were done for centuries. Slavery for example. That doesn't make it right. 0 respect for religious reasons. Your child deserves a choice. Does your child also have a right to chop a bit of your finger or ear when he grows older? As your name suggests its none of your business what to do with your child's foreskin.@@noneofyourbuizness
Its not that bad. As a jew Ive never met a man with a problem bc of his circumcision. The only one Ive heard of in my life was one that was done at 15yo. If he had done it as a baby it would have probably been ok. And even then it was just minor with 3 weeks of mild pain (and he didnt loose size)
there are jews against circumcision, my people are 90% muslim and I got circumcised and fucking hate it, its non consentual, invasive, mutilation, purely comsetic, permanent and barbaric@@kage2479
@@gimmexdemxtoes6669 if ur a dude you’d have some random 4am conversations with the boys plus it’s common sense, imagine putting on a jacket and u try poking ur arm
@@Zeaxtra This is the most relatable thing ive heard anyone say in the past month, talking on game chat or sleep overs always gets the best deep convos W
@@homeland1128 yeah but the inch removal was not agreed 💀 Imagine he was surgically adding the stolen phallus fragments to his own, creating the ultimate wank
A lot of people don't seem to realize that the foreskin actually has a reason to be there. Mainly to keep the tip soft and to give a "gliding" function (all of which also helps out your partner). It's a mucous membrane much like the inside of your eyelids and there's a stretchy band called the frenelum that has a ton of nerve endings. Getting cut removes all of that functionality and dries out the tip, so it starts keratinizing from the surface leaving it less sensitive. There's just no real reason to get it done when there aren't issues, much less on newborns who have no say in this whilst being perfectly healthy themselves
Uncircumcised fellas deserve more love in the Northern American areas. In Europe its very normal to be uncircumcised. I was quite surprised to know my fellow girlies from the West find it gross , when it's completely normal for a very large portion of the world
Dude im in the west and i didnt know 80% of americans are circumcised. Im top 20 %! 1 girl thought it was cool new to her and the rest thought it was normal
@@NikoBellaKhouf2No, I've known guys who don't properly wash their genitals. Also knew a girl who didn't kmow how to properly wash her hair. Sometimes people just aren't taught how to wash right and don't know they ain't doing it right till someone points it out.
But they don't smell this same. A circumcised man can go the whole day with no washing and maybe only smell sweaty i cant say the same for uncircumcised few hours it's smelly rotten
@@becky15707 Well your son does take after you. Just cuz most women smell like week old shrimp alfredo down there doesnt mean we legalize fgm. The only reason that shit disturbs you is cuz its alien, if you were born into it it`d make perfect sense.
Going to be brave and tell my story here I got the cut at infancy by my parents' decision. I'm fine with that now, but what I didn't know was that as a Northern European ethnicity American, I was predisposed to post circumcision reattachment. Essentially, in a state of shock, your penis grows bands of skin from the foreskin cut line and fuses that to the glans or head. I didn't know that I was different and had a weird deformity until middle school when I learned not everyone has extremely painful random bands of skin holding your manhood back like a zoo animal with a cattleprod, and let me tell you, puberty was awful for...reasons. Flash forward to my senior year if high school, I get a circumcision revision where my fake foreskin is cut off again and the stem cells fried. After healing, noticed something was different, and being a self conscious dude, grabbed a ruler. Those skin bands had been holding back almost 1.5 inches of myself for years. Needless to say Worth it
Wow this sounds like a made up story for sure lol. You went your whole life without getting any kind of checkup and then your peen grew three sizes that day like the grinch? Bruh
@@BenJover I could care less if you believe me, cuz there's no way in hell I can prove it. I was a self conscious, closeted, shamed little boy whose parents didn't allow any mention of your "private parts". Ever. My husband disagrees. Makes all the difference now To put it into perspective, I was raised Mormon. Escaped that shit fast
I was born in Europe. We don’t mutilate little boys in Poland. When I had my son after moving to the US, as a new mom, I didn’t appreciate nurses, doctors, his pediatrician AND THEY EVEN SENT A DAMN SOCIAL WORKER to change my mind (this was in 1997). I had to sign more paperwork REFUSING to allow doctors to mutilate my baby, they made me feel like I was stupid and ignorant.
WTF?? No wonder we call it Murrica over here... please come back, you don't need all the insanity they have. Or, maybe consider Canada, they are reasonable, NORMAL people! I cannot even, with all this stupidity coming from overseas. They can't even science correctly since their measuring system makes zero sense in any universe.
EVERYONE fought me on not circumcising my son. my husband isnt and has never had a problem. my thought process was simple... why do an unnecessary procedure to my newborn? hes almost 4 and i have never thought i made the wrong decision.
I'm circumcised and I would hate to not have it like this, but I get kids can't consent, so can someone explain to me why anybody cares about some foreskin? If there's a medical reason for why you all are so against circumcision, I would love to hear it. To me its just some foreskin, I don't know what the big deal is, especially since I would hate to get a surgery on it later in life than in infancy.
@@EarlofBusterbrook How can you say you would hate it if you were not? If it is something they did to you as an infant you don't know how things would be.
@@EarlofBusterbrook Reasons against it: 1) it violates someone's body that can't consent, some times to fit the beauty standards ( i have seen fathers saying they want the baby to be like them down there, weird). 2) it is painful and can have complications ( babies have lost their penis for an unnecessary reason) and don't tell me babie don't feel pain, they do, even if they don't remember it is messed up, if i slap a baby i would be a monster in everyone's eyes. 3) the benefits are almost don't exist, some claim it reduces std which makes no sense and not reliable studies support it, we don't see an actual difference in Europe and usa in uti and std when we compare cut and uncut. 4) it can effect sex life in a negative way. 5) the reasons why it started in usa was from puritans that wanted to stop self pleasure. If an late teen or adult want to do it that is fine, but when you see people that have grown and hate what others did to their bodies, that is disturbing. You always do it later but you can't undo it
as a teenager i was self conscious about it, but after i i got my first real girlfriend i became less, and less, im 41 now and i still get comments from adult women about how they think its gross and shit but IDK when my dick gets hard you cant even tell i have a foreskin, it just rolls back behind the head and my head is niiiiice and smooth soft and women that ive been with couldnt tell i wasnt uncut would compliment on how soft and silky smooth the head of my dick is. plus all my nerves have been protected their entire existence from it so yall women feel even better than having a callused uup dick thats been rubbing up against underwear and denim for 40 years. girls say they dont like it cause of hygeine but yall have wayyyy more flaps lips hoods and spaces to harbor bacteria than a covered dick. the same as you is the same with us, as long as everyone is showering properly theres never a fucking issue, so lets suck and fuck and enjoy the free amazing fun without all the bitching..... just the moaning. good job on keeping your kid skin on, i would have SWORN asa child that when i have a kid im definitely getting him cut, but getting over myself was huge and also hearing horror stories fro friends about how scarred up their dicks are from horrible circumcision jobs made me say FUCK THAT, and my sons mom insisted that my son not get cut either. so i know or a fact that she just wasnt being nice and telling me a white lie when she said she prefers a man with a foreskin. PEACE and fuck all you women that are grossed out by them, or are in fear of hygiene. 100% of the time i piss i was the head of my dick off and dry it plus shower during the day on top of it. i bet most of your men that are clipped just throw it back inside their pants while its still dripping.
Didn't circumcise my son, and I regret that decision. He had problems with the skin not retracting properly when he was little. The doctor kept wanting me to retract it daily, which was painful for him. Then she wanted me to apply hydrocortisone cream to him every day. All of it was miserable. Eventually I just stopped and figured it would either work itself out or get to a point where he would need to be circumcised. He is fine now, but it was a lot of pain and frustration along the way. I think that doctor was a quack, btw.
@@Karamarika wtf what's that doctor even or some shaman? Maybe the doctor has no contact with foreskin as so many people are circumcised in the US. Your son probably had phimosis and would need small intervention rather not months of pain.
@thedragonhunter no, it's supposed to retract a little before puberty. I spent plenty of time looking it up when this was going on. However, I don't think it was as big of an issue as the doctor made it out to be. That's why I decided to stop and take a "wait and see" approach instead.
I just wish that I was even given a choice about getting circumcized. Edit: Lots of comments here, just to answer some questions as far as I am aware I was cut shortly after birth and even now as an adult myself my parents who should have been there when it happened still do everything they can to avoid talking about the surgical operation that was done to me before i was able to form memories of my own so i know very little.
Why? I literally could not give half a shit if i’ve been circumferencified or not. Its absolutely the bottom fucking least of my worries and on my care list its lower than fucking hell. Why does everyone in this comment section think its something so important? I see most of those who complain are american so its probably some western bs that they complain and argue about for no reason. I got circumcisionisifisied whatever the fuck because of religious reasons and i couldnt care less about it
@@nazfx2648 Because people have the right to decide whether or not a part of their body gets cut off? Why do you people defend the practice so vehemently anytime anyone expresses their sorrow at having it performed on them without their consent? If you truly don't care either way, then *you're* the one "arguing for no reason." That's how reasons work.
@@masubabrenda I was circumcised at birth, I was never given a choice, my foreskin was removed before I even knew what it was, the doctors sealed the scar to the base of my gland aswell and when puberty hit it tore itself away, it's easier to explain in person to be honest.
I’m a woman and even I was like “I’m 90% sure that the frenulum is still there on a circumcised meat stick” I still think circumcision is not ok to do to a child; just teach them proper hygiene and stop the stigma among women that it “looks weird” because it doesn’t look any weirder than a circumcised meat stick. Let’s face it, all genitals look pretty odd lol
Depends on if someone got lucky enough to at least keep that part of the structure. Many don't, myself included. Just love having dried out, scarred, numb genitals. 😩
I never heard the end of it from family members when I chose not to have either of my sons snipped. It's their body, they can make that decision for themselves when they get older. Unless there's a medical reason for it, why do it? Both of my boys have been healthy, no issues at all. I just had to learn about how to care for it so I could teach them and monitor when they were able to retract the skin back so I could teach them how to keep it clean under there. It's no different than teaching little girls how to clean and care for their parts. Boys keeping their parts clean isn't any more complex or dangerous.
They're at higher likelihood of infection, reproductive complications, and a possible need for surgery later in life. The surgery for babies isn't remembered, heals faster, and doesn't cause a perceived change in sensation. Having the surgery later in life should not be done unless medically necessary as it will have all the opposite effects.
@@LiliKayyy Removing the uterus has a significant effect on the child's life. The most significant effect of circumcising a baby boy is a decreased risk of infection.
@@Arbidarb Just admit it's for "aesthetic" reasons lol Infections won't happen if you're a clean person. Where I live we are taught basic higiene by our parents, including how to properly wash our weewees and hoohaas. It's just wild to me how people especially in the US do this on children who don't have any problems whatsoever. It's just a weird thing to do if the child doesn't have complications. Just teach your children basic higiene, their foreskins are natural and meant to stay there unless it's actively risking the child's functionality. If it's not a problem for most of the world, why do americans think they're at higher risk of getting penile infections than anyone else? Doesn't make sense. Also circumcised penises are just ugly to most people, so it does affect the person negatively as it is a huge turn-off to both men and women, its something that shouldn't be done if it's not necessary.
@@LiliKayyy Circumcision has been practiced by different peoples since ancient times because they realized that sometimes it can cause reproductive problems and sometimes it gets infected. And since we wear clothes we don't have a need for the foreskin. As an adult with a working brain you should understand that infections can occur despite hygiene standards. The aesthetic argument doesn't matter in the slightest because no one really cares what kind of penises you personally prefer.
I got circumcised when I turned 18 due to the fact that I had lived with phimosis for many years and there was risk of getting infections due to the phimosis. I'm terrified of surgeries but the surgeon was very good and a sweet person and the operation was a success. I'm happy I made the decision to get the surgery.
Phimosis can't be diagnosed in immature males. I bet I know what was happening: your parents or a caregiver were "forced retractors." They were ignorant of proper penis care and pulled your foreskin back, possibly tearing skin. The foreskin is attached to the glans in a boy, with attachments called synechiae, that are like how your fingernails attach to the fingernail bed. You shouldn't be happy that you got amputated. There are many benefits to an intact foreskin. Phimosis is easy to cure in a young boy. Simple squeezing of the glans, some cream, and LEAVE IT ALONE AND STOP RETRACTING IT.
@TrackedHiker the ignorance in this comment is crazy. My boyfriend went without retracting his foreskin all his life because it caused him insane pain. He couldn't have sex, he couldn't jerk off normally, it hurt him midway getting hard. The skin was squeezing the head, which is phemosis, and he thought that's just how life with a dick is. Until he finally got circumcised, and alas, he now is happier than ever before, because he can actually use his dick as God intended.
My friend got circumcised later in life cause he wanted to fit in and his ex used to call him turtle neck 💀. It’s been two years and he says he lost a lot of sensation and it doesn’t feel as good as it used to
LMAO dude got his dick cut for a woman who dumped him,the ultimate cuck avoid that man,he is toxic for you,any man who would mutiliate his body to appease a girl who doesnt even love him is not to be trusted
@@ineedhoezThat's incredibly insensitive to say about someone who regrets a permanent life choice they were directly pressured into. If everyone in your sex life told you that your boobs were tiny until you got implants, you wouldn't want someone to say something like that to you.
My husband said the same thing. He was never cut as a kid and did it as an adult for religious reasons. After the fact he told me he lost some sensation down there, now I wish he never did it and I wish we never gave my son a circumcision. I never knew how much sensation it took away. That doesn't seem fair. That's a big thing I question in the Bible. It says not to mutilate yourself then directly tells you to mutilate babies. That doesn't check out
If we cant tattoo babies, we cant cut their foreskin either. Its the individual's choice to decide how their body must look like, skin, hair, whatever Not the parents
@Adolph-Hatler yeah im not saying its common or should be done in newborns or children in every instance, but only on specific cases that require it, no health prevention is an excuse for a procedure that can potentially affect sensitivity and that in general is unnecessary for most individuals
Every boy is born that way so it's normal to be uncircumcised. If you teach your son proper hygiene at young age then he is most likely going to maintain good hygiene as an adult. Circumcision is basically giving him a short cut to practice good hygiene, "it's easier to clean up". In the end it's his body part and he should decide as an adult. Give the man his free will to decide.
I wash my junk every day and I don't have any problems no infections, no rashes, no dick cheese... just teach your kids to keep themselves clean, don't butcher their genitals..
And SO MANY PEOPLE are ignorant of what proper hygiene is for a foreskin. Let me tell you, or anyone. 1. The only person who should ever retract a foreskin is the owner. EVER. Never, ever, ever, try to retract the foreskin. It is bonded to the glans with synechiae, the same kind of bond as between fingernails and fingernail bed, or between a girl's labia. You don't tear open a girl's genitals, do you? You don't think a baby girl's genitals need to be washed out on the *inside*, do you? 2. When the foreskin is still attached, and/or the end of the foreskin is still tight/small and not stretched out, then the space around the glans is an internal organ and the glans remains mucosa, just like in the mouth or vagina: pink/purple, not skin colored. Urine is sterile and safely flushes out that region when the boy urinates. There is nothing to wash when retraction is not happening. This also protects the glans and internal parts from external contaminants like feces. 3. It's normal for a foreskin to remain attached to the glans until even 18 years old or beyond, even through puberty. It is also normal for the end of the foreskin to remain a tight narrow ring that cannot retract past the glans for just as long. There is no need to retract it until ready for sexual intercourse. All it takes is some gentle stretching over time and possibly a cream. No surgery, no emergencies. If the foreskin gets pulled back behind the glans so it cannot move forward, just gently squeeze the glans for a while and the foreskin will be able to pass over it again. Phimosis cannot be diagnosed in a young male whose foreskin is still attached. 4. The only thing a penis should get washed with is water. No soap, nothing. Do you put soap into a girl's genitals? No, you don't, because it would cause irritation and disrupt the environment and will cause yeast infections. Even if smegma accumulates, it's just dead skin cells and skin oil. Girls get it all the time, and they don't need soap. Water will clean it out. But you don't retract a foreskin to wash unless you are the OWNER. Do you wash your ear canals with soap? Do you wash your mouth with soap? Don't be an idiot.
The foreskin is there for a reason And what a great introduction to life. First thing you experience after your first breath is someone cutting up your joystick. We’re beyond this barbarism
@@Heritagepostfarmsif I could go back a few decades and do it over… I might do it differently (though I left the final, official, decision to my son’s father) That said, I watched as our family doctor, who delivered him, injected two doses of local anesthetic. The being strapped spread-eagle and naked to the procedure board elicited more reaction than when the forceps was clamped down on the foreskin.
@@Heritagepostfarms was pretty standard procedure 30 some years ago. And as I said, the decision was made with my son’s father taking his (my husband’s) opinion and experience into consideration along with the fact that at that time I had a brother in law who was an Israeli immigrant (Jewish).
@@Heritagepostfarms I couldn’t do that to my son even though my husband wanted him circumcised. But don’t go blaming that mother. There’s real pressure for women to concede to this madness. I pushed HARD against it. I was told that I was being stupid. But I listened to our pediatrician (an Iraqi born man btw) who said that if he’d had boys (he had 5 girls), he would NOT do it. He said he had seen far more boys have issues following a circumcision than those without (ONE uncircumcised boy had phimosis and he still didn’t require a circumcision. He just needed a little help from a urologist.). That pediatrician had been in practice for roughly 50 years when he passed from pancreatic cancer. I miss him.
I’ve never been circumcised and I’m doing just fine and the majority will be too cuz it’s the way nature made us for a reason. There’s tons of nerve endings in it and it protect the most sensitive part or your body.
Btw you lose a lot of sensitivity in it cuz the most sensitive part of your body is rubbing against cloth all day. Imagine living life without the hood on your clitoris and you have a rough idea what it would be like as woman
@@ammemnon8780 it has many many benefits that it almost should be obligatory. I am a man who did it and I could not be happier seeing my dick be clean and free, and it is not irritating at all, it is actually the opposite foreskin can be tight which hurts too
@@taiemgamerxrbg2080 your dick should be clean because you clean it not because you cut it... it has absolutely zero benefits it only has a con of losing lot of sensitivity forever compromising the pleasure you can get from it. thats literally all it does. of course if its too tight you're going to sacrifice some sensitivity to get rid of the pain but thats an extremely rare case. its literally there to protect one of the most vulnerable parts of your body why the fuck would you want to get rid of it? because you have to clean it? lol
@@TheRealPhaeism what? She? He is saying that women nowadays are critical of men talking about women's sexual health and reproductive system but these women themselves will talk about men's stuffs and get it wrong
@tayar3797 Because some cereal-making quack from the 1920s thought sexual pleasure was evil, and wanted everybody to abstain from sex. He also wanted everybody to get yogurt enemas. I'm not making this up. His name was Kellogg. Yes, as in Kelloggs Corn Flakes.
As an American woman with a son, I didn’t support it either. Our Iraqi born pediatrician said that if he’d had a boy (he had 5 girls), he’d have opted not to circumcise too. 😊 I think circumcision is less common today than it was in the last 50 years. Many insurances won’t even cover it anymore.
@@MsAubrey If I remember, a study in 2010 showed the current rates for infant male circumcision in the USA was currently sub 50%, which is amazing, too bad I was born early 2000's in the midwestern USA...
circumcision is good. as parents, you need to plant good stuff like basic manners, basic logic, culture, language, gender role(only 2), etc to your kids. don't be like those dumb woke people that let their children truly free. that's not a good thing. that's more like toxic positivity. it's more like NEGLECTING YOUR CHILDREN. The purpose of family is to inherit the knowledge and stuff from the experienced older human to their new, younger human called as "children" if the role of family is gone, then the child gonna have some dad or mom issue or both. the child need to research a whole thing by themselves. and it's cruel. it's like.. in a game, MMORPG, u start over from zero. while u actually can watch some pro players giving tips on youtube so you have some basic knowledges that help you to boost your gaming experience. but life is more important and with more stuff to do than just a mere MMORPG. if parents, don't care about what their children does, it's no different from orphanage. the children just live there without guidance and knowledge legacy. BUT even some orphanage is better than those dumb woke parents..
@@DBT1007get out of here you liberal FOOL. To circumcise is to question god’s creation. Do you think god’s creation is not perfect? You are an insult to all religion!
@@DBT1007this is completely irrelevant. Your children are not going to be lost or ill disciplined because you didn’t circumcise them. Hell, my parents were proper parents when I was growing up but I still wish the surgery wasn’t forced on me.
@@DBT1007 This might just be the most mind numbingly stupid yt comment Ive ever read and Ive spent time in anime comment sections so thats saying a lot.
At birth the foreskin is attached to the head of the penis, like a nail is attached your finger. After age 2 or 3, the adhesion naturally comes loose and retraction becomes possible. Never retract a babies foreskin.
@@Sumi_SThe projection, the irony 😂 "Hey guys, here's why you actually don't need to cut a healthy part of your body off" (you): C-cope harder noooo 😞😡
It’s genital mutilation. If it’s needed because of a medical emergency so be it. However why parents feel the need to do it to their infant child for no medical reason is a huge question that is rarely raised.
It’s not genital mutilation. That’s like saying you’re mutilating someone’s fingers by cutting their nails. Genital mutilation would be if the entire organ was deformed and crippled by the procedure.
@UnohanaMash, that is a terrible argument because nails grow back. If you were to cut or rip someone's nails off completely, it would be considered mutilation
for the longest time when I was a teenager I didn't understand why in movies guys always use lotion to masturbate, since I never used it and tried it out once, because I always saw it in movies and it was way worse than without, until I realised that guys who are circumcised probably need lotion to not hurt themselfs
Hm, my partner was circumcised due to medical reasons at 12 (?) and he never uses lotion as it does nothing for him but just being over-slippery and taking the friction away.
@@stellarch9524 I knew a guy in college who had to. His circumcision was way too tight. I could see the argument against bad circumcisions but not all of them
The Doctor is right, but he left out the downsides of circumcision. I mean obviously if you cut off a part that has many nerve endings, you loose sensitivity. The glans will loose a lot of sensitivity too due to keratinization. Then there can be many issues with scarring and such. There are no real benefits to it. Its said to decrease risk of some super rare diseases, but if you wash like any reasonable person, you wont have problems with that or hygiene either.
Circumcised male working on restoration checking in: 1- its not permanent! Well, you cant grow back anatomical loss, but you can regrow skin to increase sensitivity. Your frenulum loss may vary depending on your original cut. 2- i normally love all your content Doc, but these protocols are presented as hard facts, but i can personally attest to my experience and those of others in the resto community, that overly tight circumcisions can reduce size and cause discomfort. I was too big for my cut, my skin was very tight on arousal, and i barely had sensation anywhere down there. Took me 22 years to figure that out. Even a minor amount of foreskin restoration (just enough to create slack when erect), was world altering when it comes to sensation and even comfort during arousal. We have indoor plumbing and good hygiene, there is no reason outside of cultural preference, to perpetuate this practice as a default IMO. The risk is too high.
@@azure4100 well if you consider "pleasure" as "useless" then yes, useless nerve endings. but if you think pleasure is a good thing in life, then its absolutely not useless.
@@saphiamertens yup, useless. In fact, most Abrahamic faith communities are circumsized, and they reproduce more and have stable families. Uncircumcised people on other hand, are always horny as hell, having affairs.
@@zacharybosley1191 explain my good man? I’m a virgin, circumcised, and roughly a little bit more than 6 inches. Absolutely no problem down there whatsoever. I’ve heard that porn usually tries to hire circumcised dudes as well. 🤙🔱
Remember people, all the "benefits" of a circumcision are exactly the same of having proper penile hygiene, don't let anyone tell you that you need a circumcision due to hygiene, the only motives why you would have one is because of faith (which idk men, it's pretty weird as a custom) and because of phimosis, if you don't have any of those conditions. Don't, specially if are an adult as you might lose a lot of sensitivity.
@@misssparkle6421 Mostly it’s the Abrahamic religions that practice circumcision. Judaism Christianity Islam. We do it because Abraham was commanded it by God and for his descendants and followers to do that
This video isn't accurate either. He is talking about circumcision adults but something like 75% or more of all circumcision are done to non-consenting babies. The babies foreskin is binded to the penile glands until they get older and can naturally pull it back on their own. But baby circumcision You literally slice it 360 at the head and then tear off the flesh from the penile gland. In many levels it is nerve damage, and for many people it causes erectile dysfunction.
glad theres no tradition to circumcise a baby in my country, most of parents here ask for their child consent if they would like to do the procedure. therefore no one regrets or missed their hose willy like you here
Unfortunately, my millimetre defeater has been slashed. To be honest, I don’t really know how that could affect me. For anyone wondering, it really isn’t as bad as it sounds. Well, painwise, I wouldn’t know. The biggest downside is when you’re whacking your wood in the barracks and the tip of the sword just ruins everything. But, that’s literally about it. To be honest, I’ve no idea who attacked my stick and crown jewels because I was an orphan. I’m honestly just happy that it didn’t happen recently, because I’m sure that would’ve hurt more than a bullet
Well the foreskin is a natural barrier against trauma, scratches, dirt and bacteria. So unlike some US-comments say. Foreskins are actually more hygienic if you don't wanna out yourself as someone who showers less than once a month. Your dick became almost numb to trauma and scratches. I mean you don't even feel your shorts rubbing against it. A natural guy would wince in pain from how sensitive it is. But yeah that's about it.
thats sadly loss of sensation, thats one of the biggest downsides to having no hood. Another reason why this procedure shouldnt be okay on kids or babies but if you're an adult or have a parent whos allowing you to go for it
A lot of people have this stuff completely wrong and make it much deeper than it really is. I've met men who are cut and haven't lost any sensation. Every man that I've encountered who is uncut has always had some sort of smell/cheese going on and they don't seem to feel much more, honestly it's just disgusting. You should be proud of your unhooded head, a *lot* of women prefer it that way and you won't have to deal with infections like other dudes. That being said, it still depends on the individual's hygiene habits, cut dudes can still be pretty nasty but it's much rarer. Also it's good that you had it done younger, as it would have healed much better and you will retain more sensation, and usually less scarring (depending on the doctor's skill level). Much better for deepthroat too ;)
Almost none of Europe and Asia is circumcised. It’s either heavily regulated or greatly frowned upon due to ethical implications. Non-consensually mutilating children as a preventative for something that may happen is absurd. I suppose we should give double mastectomies to young girls and hormone blockers to prevent further breast growth in order to prevent breast cancer, which is much more common and lethal than anything to do with penile health… Did you also know the female equivalent of circumcision was outlawed, and was created by the same man, not for hygiene, but to prevent masturbation?
Wow, Fake News Strikes Again! 1. Almost None Of Europe & Asia Is Cut? You Pulled That Out Of Your Ass, Islamic, Jewish, & Clean Christians All Perform This Ritual. 2. FGM is Totally Different, Dangerous, & Medically Pointless So Poor Comparison. 3. Pretty Sure Kellogg Invented Cornflakes In A Vain Attempt To Curb Masturbation, Where Is The Evidence For FGM Being Invented By Him? Conclusion Stay In School Kids; Don't Blindy Follow Your Peers On The Internet Who Are Uneducated Armchair Doctors 🤣
@@GBlockbreaker no, it’s not. This is a comment on circumcision at a young age before consent can be given and also a comment on people saying things like “it’s only skin” or similar. Foreskin and it’s removal is so much more than that. It has physical, mental, sexual, and social implications. The individual should consent and be able to consent before it is removed and that choice should not be taken away by anyone else. E.g If I had been given the choice I would have not allowed myself to be circumcised. It’s a mutilation of an important part of me that I had no choice in.
