They must have funny commercials where you live, never once did this ask me to buy anything, It told me about things coming to something I already bought.
You're asking the wrong question, lol. Read the landscape, Reclaimer is not on the forefront of requiring attention right now, no matter how much you want it. There are no working drones in game right now and won't be for another year or more. So don't hold your breath.
@@MrAceman56 I never saw the woo about having a ship build the modules, I knew it would never be a thing, but the ship now looks ugly af, they should had just kept the design and allowed cargo to attach to the inside imo
Two of my favorite people,another knockout year of work! Well done to all of those not on camera, working diligently behind the scenes to make this awesome project possible for all of us to participate in! Cheers!
I like the "idea" of everything they showcase at CitizenCon, but as a long time follower, i've come to realize there is quite a lot they show off but then don't plan to implement for a VERY LONG TIME. And it seems like every CitizenCon they just keep adding more things.
If you knew anything about the game, you would know that they do implement some stuff they've shown In the past years and exactly why they haven't/can't include the stuff they've already made. Those being server meshing and the dev team designing an entire game that is close to completion, an hour long gameplay segment that has already been shown.
@@rooster1012 yes but how, im IMAGINING theyll release a base building drone module that uses the hangar cargo as the storage/supplies but they havent said anything on it officially
This could be like an mmo version of starcraft. 2 competing orgs go down to a location the drones go out and start building base structures then they attack each other with what assets they build and started with. The drones would be like the protos builder drones.
Love the MISC new SL series 👍🏻 got myself a MAX! now I hope the Carrack will get an upgrade in size 5 turrets…. 😅 because size 4 seems to small to defend it self proporly 😮
Dude the new STARLANCER ship line up is actually really good got the two available waiting for the starlancer build to go up for grabs n ima snatch that one up as well
I think they could keep the arm, but reconcept it as a Hull compatible loading bay. It would obviously only work in space, but i can imagine the Pioneer chewing through a ton of resources.
Hopefully now that Citizencon is over you guys can start addressing the client server disconnects with the error 30000. The game is pretty much unplayable for a lot of people right now.
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator They release ships every year without their gameplay who are you trying to BS and that is also not the excuse John Crew gave last year he stated that it is complex and will require an experienced art team on it as the last team that was working on it quit the company.
The BMM will be done as one of the last ships of the backlog, it might be multiple years away guys. They said it in a interview, so stop crying and simply sell this ship if you dont want to wait
#9 is a small ship and definitely not the Liberator look at the guy standing next to it, also the ships go from smallest to largest and the Liberator is Certainly larger than the #10 Drake ship and there is not a ship in there with the Lib's profile.
@@rooster1012Are we watching the same video? #10 is confirmed the pioneer and #9 is confirmed the ironclad. Most of them are known except for one or two.
Height yes but length the fury is allmost 4 meters shorter than the razor. But the point is the fury has double firepower than the razor which is better for the Tac which is a gunship. @@CathrineMacNiel
@@CathrineMacNiel nah the razor is just a small racing ship. It has it's own quantum drives. Snub ships generally don't, they instead depend on their mother ship to get around. (Arguable exceptions are the pisces and 85x, but both of those exceed the rest of the snub ship class in various ways anyways, so it's debatable if they should be seen as snubs)
what do you think they are doing right now? 3.24.2 is on the 4.0 codebase, so some instability was to be expected. But they are actively providing hotfixes for clients and servers.
So happy to get hands on my Polaris finally. it was my 2nd SC ship, worked hard to get one since 2019, I decided to get one because it was the only ship that had an internal hanger at that time.
@ChrisBuege-tr7bx lol, man I would have loved to get that, kraken and Javelin but I'm broke AF. But yea, there were some ships that were dedicated carriers at that time. I should have made that clarification above.
Crafting only really works if there are players who can not obtain ships through purchasing due to being new or whatever caused them to lose their own ship. So how would ownership of crafted ships work? Would they be assigned to the crafter? I dont want a list of every ship I craft.
Did you not hear them? Crafting will take ages and will be the only way people are able to have the best of the best stuff. New players aren't going to want to buy top of the line ships, orgs and high level players will probably be looking for the combative edge. I don't think the ship market specifically will be the big thing, overall the system is cool. It's like saying Warframes trading only works if people are new, but it still works very well despite this.
@@OriginalDagic By trade? Surely 1 credit or something is achievable unless they put limits on it to not crash the trading. I think Warframe has the same thing as to not uncut the market.... although right now you can literally just board someone's ship and it is for all intents and purposes, yours.
Die Show ist großartig geworden. Aber wenn man sich alle Patches ansieht, die jetzt veröffentlicht wurden, sind sie grob, unvollendet, mit einer großen Anzahl von Fehlern ... Aber sie beheben sie entweder nicht oder vielleicht ist es ihnen einfach egal. Mich bei so einer Arbeit so sehr zu enttäuschen... Ich glaube nicht, dass sie innerhalb von 18 Monaten mindestens 1 % von dem umsetzen können, was auf dieser SHOW gezeigt wurde. Dafür ist die Show gemacht, einfach um zu versprechen... Und welche Dinge, die bei der letzten SHOW versprochen wurden, wurden tatsächlich pünktlich geliefert? Was davon funktioniert jetzt tatsächlich? Was funktioniert eigentlich? Hangars? (Nein, sie funktionieren nicht!) Alles ist kaputt. Fehler 30000 verfolgt die Spieler. Di und dieser Fehler hat in der Häufigkeit seines Auftretens noch weiter zugenommen. Insgesamt bin ich enttäuscht.
I was with you until I saw the $40 vs $45 10-year insurance contract pledges. Insurance seems like a looming thing waiting to make my experience less fun.
@@yashirhakkar2309 lol.. yeah right. 1 year ago, SQ42 was 90% completed and in polishing stage. Not my words, the words of fat Chris. Hopeless.. really hopeless.
10:19 #American #Carrier #IN It's always thrilling to listen to an audio landscape, especially when you're adjusting the playback speed freely (altered soundscape). I distinctly heard the phrase "American Carrier Inside" instead of what was actually said, and I thought that was pretty cool. Farewell.
Another Citizencon where 90% of things shown still wont even be in game by next citizencon. lol CIG has perfected the art of bullshitting its playerbase, then selling them a shiny new ship.
Seeing as most of the citizen con was talking the next 3-4 years yeah. They made it very clear that this was looking forward but you were too blind sighted by your hatred to see it. They don't have to bs the player base because people support their mission and goals for the game.
@@SozeHB Mostly because the player base consists of people who don't know anything about game development, and are happy to buy a dream as long as it's sold to them in a pretty package. But hey, at least you can RP that they're producing something good... right?
@@SozeHB Youre flat out lying if you say CIG has never bullshitted their players. Buddy i got ships i paid several hundreds for 10 years ago that are still not in the game. Thats Bullshit. Im not blinded by hate im just fed up with their bs. poor management, poor appropriation of funds, lack of clear communication. Flat out disrespecting their players when we voiced our disapproval of things they were doing. Lies and more lies. The majority of the player base is so heavily invested in this games success that theyre willing to let CIG get away with whatever they want and have no accountability. Thats why you still dont have a game a decade and 700 million dollars later. Ill call it like i see it until CIG prove otherwise. I owe them nothing,
CIG makes it very clear that Star Citizen is not a full game. If you look through their TOS (at the very beginning) they clearly state that it is not and will not be a full game for some time (You are buying into a closed alpha). They also explicitly mention that ships, items, gameplay, etc... may take longer to be completed than what was initially suspected. It was YOUR decision to buy ships under these terms as an SC player. You could have stuck with your $45 starter and lived the best life you could amongst the stars. As for the long development, it's to be expected. They are the ONLY company to go this advanced with game development (they literally have to create all of the tech to complete the game (which is expensive)). Compared to the time it took to make StarField, SC's development time hasn't been much longer. And that's with most (maybe more than half idk) of the devs working on the original and primary game: Squadron 42. With Squadron in polish we should see SC advance at an insane pace. With server meshing, StarEngine 4 and all of the new tech unveiled this year complete or almost complete it's time for SC to become the game it's meant to be.
@@SozeHBwow not even close to release anytime soon. What have they been doing the last 12 years lol. And these people still believe they're gonna get the game. Easy money 😂. Let me guess in another 6 years they're gonna completely redesign the game around a new engine and it'll take some more time and so forth. They have mastered the grand gaming con
