CLASSICAL LATIN & VEDIC SANSKRIT 

this is truly subjective

@@park__seongju That's fair

Sanskrit sounds very great. Some historians say it is the sweetest sounding and speaking language.

@@superboy3633 I want to know cool places I may hear more of this language. (:

​@@crusiethmaximussBut it is very ancient.No one speaks Vedic Sanskrit in today's era.But you hear it in religious practices in India.

To me it just sounds like some jungle language.

@@rpoutine3271 go check out your ears

it was considered divine language back in the day so much so that commoners weren't allowed to learn it!!

search up "Do Modern Greeks Know Ancient Greek? | Easy Greek 12", THEN "In-flight Safety Video in Vedic Sanskrit" - which one sounds better?

@@rpoutine3271lol jealous?

Svaha doesn't have the same connotations as amen.

@@mrsubramanian-hy9xb In essence it does. Both mean 'well said' or 'true' or to a lesser extent, 'we agree'. Humans aren't that different at the core when you compare civilisations.

@@reubenismyname Amen really can only be applied in Abrahamic context and Svaha for Hindu ones. Though they may have the same meaning in theory, they can't be taken out of their respective cultures.

@@mrsubramanian-hy9xb I agree with you to a certain extent. Because at the end of the day, we are saying the same thing in different ways. Similar to biology, linguistics also has convergent evolution. Different cultures and languages develop the same concept independently.

Interesting

I always pronounce Latin using the Classical pronunciation, the Ecclesiastical Latin pronunciation is just wrong honestly

i hear ['reːŋnʊ̃]

but it won't change the meaning, for example the American accent turns foreign to native English speakers in the UK, even the Brazilian pronounciation are different with EU Portuguese but it doesn't change the meaning because they are the same languages

@@goulven05 Yep, me too, pronuntiationem classicam semper utor, non mihi placet uti ecclesiasticam, sonī litterarum sunt meliores in classicā.

@@beyurzelf it doesn’t matter, it sounds weird to mix both pronunciations, she said /sanktifiketur /, not / sanktifichetur / or / kaelis /, not / chèlis /, / hodie /, not / odie /… So it doesn’t make sense to say reñum instead of regnum (classical)

2-6 are slavic is similar to indoiranian. 7-9 are more similar to latin and baltic. Dantis (tooth, Zub), viras, deiwos are similarities between latin, bał IC and sanskrit.

All theses classes and branches are linked as indo-slavic, indo-persian, indo-baltic and indo-indic and indo-tocharian and indo-nepali they are related and married and walk together til today eland forever.

Среди Европейцев самые близкие к индоарийцам это Балты и Славяне

The guy who pronounced rhe numbers is a youtuber named polýmathy

@@eyeless_person i know

@@quamne cool

Esperanto isn’t Romance. It’s Romance-Germanic-Slavic

@@volpixrossi3589 Its vocabulary is mostly Romance with some words from Germanic, Hellenic and Slavic languages

I think Urdu is the closest thing that exists: It is a sanskrit-derived lingua-franca (Tons of Perso-Arabic words). Because how Farsi uses a ton of Arabic loan words as-well-as other languages in these areas: Nepali, Pashto, Hindiko, Punjabi, Bengali & such; It's of great help, as-well-as sanskrit derived words: The addition of Iranian derived words & grammar helps Iranic language speakers like Pashto, Uzbek, Dari etc. So, for Iranic language speakers & Sanskrit-derived language speakers, Urdu is the most balanced language. Although, it might be more easily understood by the Hindustani region rather than the greater Iran (Ariya) region.

True, they are distantly related, but even so, Latin and Italian took words from Sanskrit and adapted them for themselves, despite all this deep distance between both classes of languages, Neo-Latin and Indic.

​@@Nwk843no ITS not loandword, ITS derrived from common Indo European

@@Nwk843 words like Saccharum ( "Azúcar" in Spanish ) are loanwords from Sanskrit through Arabic , other words are cognates from their Indo-European ancestry

You dont believe these languages are related? Spit it out

Whales and elephants are actually pretty close genetically lol

Both are mammals. And they have common ancestors 😊

😂😂.

Ast means to be in sanskrit. Est means to be in latin. Whole and elephant, woow....

It's a invencible fact, both all are Kurganians forever, this truth will never change, they are related directly.

There are many obvious Latin-Sanskrit cognates in these examples, especially the numbers, as well as pater=pitá (father), nōmen=náma (name), divi=divine (not in this text), et=uta (and), regnum=rájyam (rule), nōs=nas (our).

How is it crazy when it's supported by scientific consensus and is obvious by what this video shows?

@marinaaaa2735 Because when you think of the cultures related to Latin and related to Vedic cultures, theu are entirely different. No one mentally mixes Indians and Roman soldiers in their mind as being distantly related at all.

@@lateblossom yes but culture and language are separate things. No one thinks of indians and japanese as being the same culture yet their religions share the same root

pater noster - pita nau es - asti nomen tuum - nama tai regnum tuum - rajyam tai da nobis - daihi nas

The Lord works in mysterious ways.

True.But they are way more similar unlike any East Asiatic ,Arabic or Turkic languages.

@@dnronar also since it's more of a literal translation, not an etymological one, even if it was translated to the same language it would still feel like there was two different people made it anyway

Pita father Patr father. Asti to be verb Est to be verb. Nam name Nomen name. Although indic branch mixed with arabic, dravidian and turkeye still have some roots even scientist say that there was a language called Indo-european.

If you take pancasila from buddhist concept it's from pali language

Yes panca means five in Sanskrit

Why?

Because it's not even the oldest IE language

@@alexiosikomnenos7749 what is it?

There is no such thing as the "purest, oldest and most original daughter language" of Kurganian, all families and daughter classes of Kurganian have value and are related in unity. This conversation starts all wrong with denialism and lies.

it will, because nobody believs that

i think you are mad because sanskrit is mother langvâge of most of european langvâge . and aryan invasión is totaly wróng

The schizophrenic people replying to this comment tho 💀 They use the >> symbol to "establish the superiority of their language and race and religion" so much that they forgot that some people use them to connect words in a comparison

@@aditaysoni7157 Explain , how can Sanskrit , a language spoken around 2000 BC to 1500 BC in India be the mother of Ancient Greek , a language that were first spoken around the same time , on a completely different continent away ? How about Hittite which was spoken near the body of water that seperates Asia Minor and Europe , a language that came to be around 1800 BC ? If you say that Indians conquer and influenced European languages , explain their migration route , which way did they go ? When did it happen ? Why is it that cultures like Oxus , Andronovo , Sintashta , Afanasievo , ... Are all older than 2000 BC yet they show traits similar to both Indic and European cultures but only become more Indic as they go South , closer to India ? Why do Yamnaya artifacts that date back to around 4000 BC yet they still connect all Indo-European cultures ? How can any out of India migration routes make sense when in order for the Indians to create European languages , they need to travel back in time each step to the North they go ? Also , does your "European languages" include Finnish , Hungarian , Estonian , Basque or Etruscan , languages that have nothing to do with Sanskrit at all ?

Are u mad😂😂😂

​@@kingofnuggets7304👈 according to the sources nearly 5000 years ago nuclear attack happened near Saraswati River (Indus river)due to that war the people of harappa migrated to west bcoz there is much cultural competition in South and Eastern parts of India (Bhaath)and another theory suggests that as per old Vedic books (2,3,4,7,8)there is a war happened b/w bharatha dynasty and other 9 dynasties and finally bharatha dynasty won and remaining dynasties went to Western side of the world and one of them are Parsikās (now modern day Persians)

What does the DSMP in your name means?