The amount of people mentioning Pathologic in the comment section over and over is pathological. What is wrong with scrolling and liking the first person to mention it. They all post the same thing hoping to get likes or want to feel important. I think it’s a bot or something. There’s just no way that many people are that disconnected with how a comment section works.
@@armokgodofblood2504 imgur.com/a/sagtusN, unfortunately Windows doesn't want me to crop the photo in half. Outer Wilds currently has a store page with a "TBD" release date. Unless they pull some shady Epic shit (which has been done before) and delete that at the last moment..
The played " the outer wilds" 2 weeks ago. This game has changed the way I see video games, its creepy, it's exciting, its mysterious, its expansive. It's a game that's all about the journey instead of the destination. I went into this game completely blind and had no idea about the time loop why anything was happening when they did, I didnt read any walkthroughs or how to videos and spent hours going through the evidence, backtracking, trying to find how to get where I needed to go, that might sound bad to some people, but by the end of it all, its truly e best gaming experiences I've had to date.
you're so damn right tried it for the very first time last month, going blind except for knowing about that time loop stuff mais i enjoy SO MUCH finding new evidences while falling asleep after work..... i dont want to finish it so im slowly understanding everything..... cant wait to comprehend that quantic moon and everything else omg
It cannot be said loud enough and often enjoy. What Game Maker's Toolkit creates lifts the industry up with each video. This one in particular really spoke to me. You are inspirational to people who want to do this sort of thing and instructive to the rest of us. I hope you become the President of Video Games one day....
I played outerwilds and it instantly became one of my favorite games of all time, I think the way it tells a story is super unique and at the same time very heart-touching. Also I loved the idea that you already have all the tools to finish the game, there is no real mechanical upgrades, the only thing that upgrades is your brain with the knowledge of the world.
Fun fact: There's an easter egg in The Outer Wilds that directly references Elsinore. One of the artists of Elsinore was the art director for The Outer Wilds.
I feel like an honorable mention should go out to Ghost Trick for the DS. All of its levels were self-contained puzzles that happened in real-time and never longer than 4 minutes. Plus, it's just a super fun game.
Duuuude I was about to comment about that, I was sure noone would've known about this awesome game! One of my most memorable experiences on DS as a kid :)
I got it on the playstore years ago, one of the best game I played on mobile great story, cool mechanics Unfortunately it's not on the playstore anymore (though i believe it's still possible to get the .apk from other website)
I finally played and completed Outer Wilds, so now I can watch this video. That was one of the best experiences I've had in gaming. The joy of discovery, putting seemingly disparate pieces of information together to figure out the logic puzzles.... it was so beautifully crafted, especially the ending. I will hype this game up to anyone that listens, especially for the cheap price it is.
The concept of “so much crime and we can only respond to 10% of calls” is exactly why I thought Dredd and it’s Mega City One would be brilliant for a video game
I'd agree with you, though I'would offer the point that it leads to a few obvious playstyles. Not just that, as a weakness, I feel that if you're say, a Judge who is hunting down a set gang, gang member it could be argued the game itself is punishing you, for making the choice. Not just setting you on a new path, actually punishing you, to the degree it might even be impossible to take on said gang member down the line. If that's the point of the game, fine. You want my help to design and develop it, pay me. If it's not and you want to have something which still gives the players agency, the ability to set the tone of their game play experience, then you're getting in their way. In the scope of a hypothetical Judge Dredd game, I can see being a Judge on patrol, case by case, taking the calls as they come in. I can also see a more..... focused Judge, they don't care as long as they hunt down their target, be it a murderer, gang, gang leader. Both are viable, both are reasonable for the world, yet, the player who wants to destroy a single gang shouldn't be punished for their choice, otherwise viable and reasonable for the world. As unreasonable, ugly and nasty as that world is.
that would be a great oportunity to revive the "Cop Game" genre. as flawed, and as rushed as it was... "True Crime: New York" is still at the top of that Genre.
You would think so, but all that usually happens is the player replays the game and does all the opposite things they did the first time round. They are no longer as immersed instead they just want to seek all the content that was just locked out of their first playthrough. It's a neat gimmick for 1 or 2 decisions but you would be running into a lot of issues if you made it a central theme.
Pathologic (2) also uses this constraint of time to the maximum; to simultaneously make the player feel the pressure and hopelessness of the game and to make it clear that the player CAN NOT do everything. Completion is not something to strive for (and can actually backfire: just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should!), making the right decisions are the goal of the game, and that doesn't mean just choosing the right things to say to someone, it involves moving to the right part of town, not wasting time on lost causes, since just deciding to pay someone a visit might end up putting you too far away from an event you need to be at. It's probably the best game to use time as a gameplay mechanic, currency AND plot.
The original Pathologic is a masterpiece, a game that uses time to create a real sense of impotence and dredfulness... Is an unique, artistic and profound game.
Pathologic 2 is a recent very unusual and criminally underrated "clockwork" game where you're unable to succeed at everything by design. It's beautiful though and should totally get more coverage.
Pathologic 2 has a great use of time to put pressure on the player. Very much in the Dead Rising style, except taken to the logical extreme and forcing you to prioritize some things over others.
Pathologic and Pathologic 2 do everything you mention in this video and more. It helps that they are meant to be stressful games. Im quite suprised you havent talked about these gems as there are many lessons to learn from them and they are more accessible than ever.
That reminds me of one of the first quest in Kingdom Come Deliverance. My father give me a very classic quest, go fetch something from a npc and bring it back. Since it was one of the first quest, I took my time exploring the little city and immersing myself into this world. When I finally finish the quest, my father scolded me, asking me why it took so long. I found it very cool and deeply immersing even if it was just a small dialogue !
Personally, I've never had much of a problem with "missing" content in a game because I was busy doing my own thing or just couldn't get to it all in time. I think a large-scale open world game with a clockwork system would obviously mean missing quite a bit, but it's going to add soooo much replay value to the game. Plus it'll make the game much more enjoyable to watch a friend play simply because each run is so unique. I think it just makes the world feel much more alive and independent of the player, which to me is the best kind of game to get lost in.
I don't think that's feasible from a development standpoint, not only are you making a large-scale open world but you'd have to spend time, money and resources making content that lots of players will never see.
I want to agree with you, there's a couple of games I play in very set ways. Each time I play them, I aim for a particular result. Binary Domain is one of them, Deus Ex Human Revolution and Mankind Divided, to a degree, the same. I also want to point to Homeworld 1 here. More so than the second. While it doesn't have a time stress per say, I think it needs to be said that if you do things, don't do things in some scenarios, it has longer term effects as you progress. So you go and don't harvest one area out, it can hurt. To a degree, Homeworld Emergence did this wrong. It had the idea in there, but if you were smart and..... well, know the game well, you're not really spending much and you can tech up pretty quickly and early.
@@777Lloyd777 will they never see it though? In the age of Twitch and RU-vid, making a game where not every player sees the same content is actually quite a good idea. Let's Plays have a finite lifespan in most modern games: once a few people finish the game, that's kind of it. But Let's Plays are the easiest kind of content to make, and are the most important kind of content for engaging the interest of new players. Look at games like Europa Universalis IV. There are channels which have been getting content out of that game for years now. Why? because every playthrough is genuinely different. Now that is an emergent property of that game's staggering complexity, it's such a complicated game that most people won't play it (even if it is fun to watch playthroughs). A game where content happens independent of the player would achieve the same effect without the ridiculous complexity of EU. What does that mean? it means your game doesn't lose relevance as quickly. Interest doesn't wane, because the Let's Plays keep coming. You could make a game that didn't have to sell to an enormous audience on it's first day: so, you could skip the ridiculous marketing push. Word of the game would spread slowly but surely, as the Let's Plays started to roll in. It would get more popular over time, not less (if, obviously, it was any good). Some games have already done this: Day Z, DotA, Team Fortress. But that's of course because those games started as mods: their makers weren't originally attempting to monetize them at all. You could, in short, make a completely original game that needed no marketing at all except for the marketing provided by satisfied customers (players). Sure, you give up the promise of short-term wealth: but you get the guarantee of staying power. Some games have already come close to this: it took years for people to truly experience everything Demon's Souls had to offer, because of how dramatically the numerous items altered the gameplay. From Software had already announced Dark Souls before the Let's Plays stopped coming. Minecraft broke RU-vid largely because of how much the procedural generation actually affected the gameplay. In most games that use it, the procedural generation just stops you from memorizing the levels. It doesn't really have a big effect on your experience of playing the game. But in Minecraft, if affects the entire playthrough by determining your starting strategy and the obstacles you'll run into along the way. It became one of the biggest games in the world before it was even out of alpha, simply through Let's Plays on RU-vid. Mojang didn't market the game because...well...it was still in alpha. They weren't actually trying to sell it yet, because they didn't consider it finished. By the time they were ready to release the game practically everyone with a computer owned it, Notch was already a billionaire (off the $10 beta), and Microsoft was begging to buy the company. And this was all before Twitch.tv was even a thing. That's what you could get if you made a game that truly felt different every time it was played.
If you make the game with replayability in mind it can work okay. But forcing the player to replay the game will take them out of the experience, they will no longer care about their character and instead they will min/max experiencing things as much as possible so their next playthrough they can complete it properly. The game stops being about exploration and becomes a rush to get to the main events. Like catching the right train at a station. I think it's totally unworkable as a central game theme without bringing in more problems than it solves. But if you've got the time and talent to spare by all means.
I loved how in the Sims 3, the town and its inhabitants were always changing. Sometimes you would visit a house and if you later went back to it perhaps the grandfather had died and they had some new kids. Or someone new moved into your neighbors old house.
I think clockwork mechanics go well with "choices matter" type of game where the story can branch differently based on choices you make, and adding time to the mix is one way to extend it from "choices matter" to "actions matter" as every action you take, not just a scripted choice, will affect things. To satisfy completionists a bit more, you could create a tree of all the critical points where the story could have branched, and after completing their first play trough of the game, players could be offered some tool to go back to a branching point and attempt to go down a different path (if it can be worked into the story/lore of the game that's cool, but could also just be a n unlockable mode in the option menu), which does add a bit of time-loopy stuff, but not so much during gameplay, but more as a reward for finishing and being able to go back and explore alternative endings and end up completing everything if you wish, whilst players who just want to play trough the game a single time don't deal with any 'time travel'
really EVERY game should have a "doomfall" mode, where you have three days before some thing crashes into the planet or something, and you get rated at the end by how many cycles you took.
Everyone wanted BotW to have its own MM, and that seems to be what they're doing But what people meant by that isn't a time loop, it's the reuse of the engine and assets to make a better game in a short time
During the speculation leading up to BotW, people were hoping that the game would do EVERYTHING every previous game had done, on some scale. I was sure that we'd be able to find a section of the map with large birds that could be ridden instead of horses/bears/deer. I also wanted the game to have a handcrafted loop for most of the NPCs to make the world feel more lived in and real like MM did. A "week" that was maybe 4 days long (three week days and a single weekend) with a "month" that was 2-3 "weeks" and after-3 "months," the season would change. Most of the weeks would be cloned loops for most characters, but maybe in the middle weekday of the third week of summer would be one NPC's birthday, or during one particular week out of the calendar, a town builds a festival, like in MM. Ultimately, while I still feel like that'd lead to some interesting easter egg moments and quests, it's probably a lot of work that wasn't needed, and I'm pretty happy with the game as developed.
The first clockwork game I've seen was "I have one day" by Cellar Door Games, it has a similar core idea as the Outer Wilds, but it's a point-and-click game. My favorite moment was when three wizards asked me to solve a logical riddle. When I went through that moment the second time, one of them said something like "Ah, you already know the answer, don't you?" Also, "Pathologic" by Ice Pick Lodge has some similar idea of changing the world over time, but it's more about politics, economics and plague spread, but the whole loop takes all 12 days of gameplay, which is 24 hours of real-world time, and there's three parallel stories about different doctors.
@@CiromBreeze yeah, I actually found this game after I came across an easter egg in rogue legacy. You know, there are paintings with their older games.
Like others, I'm surprised you made a video about this topic and didn't even touch on Ice Pick Lodge's games. The Void, Knock-Knock, Pathologic, and probably best done in this years Pathologic 2 all tackle the very thing you talk about in this video, with Pathologic 2 in particular going the furthest with it. I honestly highly suggest checking these games out, there's a lot to dissect about them, and Pathologic 2 I honestly think is a currently underlooked masterpiece in experimental game design that's focused heavily on the engaging nature of disempowerment, time management, survival gameplay done right, difficulty serving narrative purpose, death states in a game serving narrative purpose, and many other things.
Pathologic 2 is to me, one of the best examples of this sort of thing. Events are missable, there are even some things that turn out BETTER through your inaction. Time literally speeds up as the days go by, so you can accomplish less and less the worse things get. It sells the experience of being the sole person trying to divide your time well enough to help everyone who's suffering, and being the only one who CAN fix things.
Majora's Mask makes the Hero of Time feel like he really is the Hero of Time. Especially if the number of time loops needs to be optimized. Any% TAS was completed in two time loops (one purely to get the Ocarina and Song of Time because Skull Kid had it thanks to the events of the game's opening sequence and Link needed it back, and the second to do all the Temples and awaken the Giants to prepare for the final showdown with Majora on the Moon, and all four Temples were barely possible to fit in one loop, thanks especially to sequence breaks like early hook shot) and 100% could be done in three time loops, at least theoretically (especially with the infamous Kafei Anju side quest, not to mention all the heart pieces, all the masks, and all the songs for the Ocarina and its transformations) since the only things the Hero of Time loses whenever he resets time are the rupees in his wallet (bank account left untouched) and all of his ammo, which he can easily refill anyway.
You know what's really fun, though? Once you get all of the abilities you need: Every mask, every upgrade, every heart container... you can help _almost every character in a single time loop._ The Old lady has to get her bag stolen to let you progress Kafei's quest, but otherwise, effectively everyone else can have their quest completed before you must call the giants to save Termina. The timing is so strict that I don't know if anyone has completed it yet, but it's absolutely possible
A game I'm really fond of that addresses this as well is Pathologic. You really have to be careful with the choices you make and the actions you do because the time may (and will) affect those that matters to you. Is a game really tied with this "clockwork mechanic" and I can't recommend it enough.
Pathologic is the best game I played of this style. But the presure is constant in that game and can be frustrating sometimes so I understand if not everyone likes it.
Pathologic tries a similar system it uses its time limits as a way to instill dread and enforce the horror of the game, the system interacts well with the story reinforcing the fact that you cant save everyone the way this system stress makes you feel the same as the protagonists overworked and ovestretched in a dying city it in my opinion a lot better than just telling the player that you are supposed to feel a certain way. There is a lot to pathologic apart from this and in my opinion both the original and sequel are little masterpices
The fact that you can miss events and you're not told about many of them is somewhat frustrating but it's a very powerful narrative device in Pathologic. After all, the authors say flat out that the gameplay is "designed to be unbearable," so, it's intentional. It's also very cool that the events aren't necessarily binary: when you miss something, you don't completely lose that part of the story. Instead, the events develop independently from you. You might miss one point in a side story, but that story will go on and you can try and influence it at later stages. Pathologic is very impressive in that regard, but also hard to play.
@@AgentAsh Exactly, I really like that not being there for one event will not just "fail" that story line but simply make it move on without you. if a character needed your help with something, they won't just fail, they might be working with a different person and getting different results outside of your control, making choices that you might not approve of.
@@AgentAsh Yeah, I genuinely am not sure if I can stand to play Pathologic 2, but I think it's brilliant that it exists and I am quite desperate to _see it played_. There's so much experimental and unusual stuff going on there.
Dude people are talking about the best games in this comment section! Rune factory was one of my most touching experiences on ds along with Ghost trick (that's mentionned in another comment) The nintendo DS definitely holds a unique place in my heart and never fails to make me nostalgic.
Probably because most of the time in those kind of games, the structure of what you can do isnt strictly linked to the WHEN, meaning most of the in-game time doesnt really changes much what you usually do (besides very espesific things like events, or where a character is, etc.) so they don't really factor too much when decisión making comes into play.
Animal crossing just has a really long 8760 hour loop. You're only going to be able to experience Christmas once a year, but you can do it every year without starting over.
@@Xx2Devexia2xX I saw that comment too. I there are a lot of hidden gems out there! Ghost Trick was one of the last games I played on Ds before the 3DS.
I love the Deadrising time system, it really forces you to learn the fastest routes in the map and you feel the pressure when the timer turns red. And saving EVERY SINGLE survivor in the OG Deadrising is a real challenge but it's doable
Here i must mention Pathfinder: Kingmaker. This is one of the very few classic-style (D&D) RPGs which actually takes time into account. If you get reports of a problem with trolls that needs to be solved, and you wait for a month before doing anything - well, some characters would be in a great trouble because of you thinking "well, they will just wait". Time is on real scale, so taking 10 more minutes to clear the dungeon don't impact things on a global scale at all. What actually spends time is travelling and resting. In D&D your characters have limited amount of spells per one rest. Rest takes 8 hours, and spare time you have is usually measured in weeks. If you use spells excessively, yeah, you will stomp every problem... but you also would have to rest after every encounter, taking a lot of time to deal with any adventure. This way, time limits do not punish you for being pedantic and for exploration, but they might punish you for never managing your resources or ignoring common sense.
Cannot BELIEVE you didn't mention pathologic 2! That game has so many side quests you cannot possibly finish all of them in the time limit, and failure to complete them doesn't just result in missed loot, but dead characters, reputation loss, or even your own death. The story actively changes based on which quests you decide to do and which you ignore or fail. It is a brutal game.
Of all games that mess with time one way or another I would mention: The Void, Pathologic, Deponia Doomsday, Braid and Katana Zero (though only in the story, not so much in gameplay).
@@commanderleo actually, no. It's in effect throughout the entire gameplay, in the interrogation scene it merely gets obvious. And there's one more scene where it goes wrong and reminds you of its existence.
@@commanderleo I would say it does. It actually explains in-universe such a mundane mechanic that we no longer notice because of how prevalent it is: level restarts. And then pulls a few twists based on that.
Rainworld is a unique example of a clockwork game. Every one off the 1000 or so of the animals in that perfect and gourgus metroidvania has a mind of its own. Each of them have relationship to the player and each other they fight for territory run from bigger predictors and find the perfect camping spots. This and the 5 to 25 minute cycles of each game make it feel incredibly living. Each time my slug Cat wake up I know i have to check each room I go in fear despite knowing the world like the back of my hands as you never know when a camo lizard is getting ready to snaffle you. Another beautifully edited video with a clean and clear reasoned perspective. Your my favourite channel on RU-vid
Outer Wilds was amazing. The time mechanics were great but it also made me want a more traditional adventure game based on this sort of miniature solar system.
rain world is an amazing game where every creature in the game moves about the world in real time, whether offscreen or onscreen, hunting for food and getting into territorial skirmishes based on the creature's AI even when you arent there. it makes the game world feel more alive and i think its a really cool example of a more unscripted clockwork game.
Great video. The game mechanic I am really looking for is one where as the player progresses in the time loop, the unlock the ability to start at an earlier point in time, allowing them better understand events as they unlock more of the past.
I'm so happy to see you do a video on this, it is one of my favorite topics in games. You showed Persona 5 on screen briefly, and I think the modern Persona games are another good example, even if they're not real time. You still have to manage your time as a limited resource and strategically plan out how to make the best use of your time. Another game I love that focuses on time management is Pikmin. Pikmin doesn't try to recreate a believable world with NPCs acting out in real time, but it still has you trying to manage your time and efficiently play through things, as some of the games mentioned in this video did. But like you mentioned, time mechanics stress a lot of players out. So they removed the time limit in Pikmin 2, and then added it back into Pikmin 3 because of how important it is to add tension, but they made it adjustable in Pikmin 3 depending on how you play and just generally made it a lot more generous. Similar to later Dead Rising games removing the time limit. I love Dead Rising, but so many people complained about the time limit, even though that is the best and most interesting part of the game. Such a shame.
I think Pikmin really hits this idea home. It's a time limit that's not really stressing, but you can't just wait around either, as well as being done in a way that's believable for it's setting. Now realistically, especially in the case of Pikmin 3, you're probably never going to fail to that time limit (I ended the game with ~40 extra canisters of juice), but the fact that it's there makes the world feel more alive, but also still lets you take your time a little and enjoy the scenery
This reminds me I need to play the Pikmin games at some point. I also think that the idea that...... well, my issues is save scumming on some level. If I feel I burn too much time doing something, I will go back and try to cut down my time doing it. Some generousity is required, but not to the degree that you don't ever worry about it. I also think it's going to be really answered in the testing phase. Say, you have a scenario you have to complete in an hour, if the mission total length is 45 minutes, I'd argue that would be about right. If you push it to 50 min, 55 min, you're cutting off that time to do things. If it's more like 30 min, 35 min, then why set the time limit? It's a balancing act.
@@LionofCaliban Yeah, that's a good point. It makes me wonder about that Vision Soft Reset game Mark talked about in the video, where the whole mechanic is rewinding time and trying to do thing better. It sounds like it does it well, but how much wiggle room is there in the game? Especially if you're just starting out and don't know how long the full thing is. Are those 30 seconds worth replaying part of the game for? I have no idea. As for Pikmin, it is rather generous. Pikmin 1 is all about collecting 30 of the collectibles in 30 days, so as long as you make a point to get one a day you'll be fine. On top of that, you'll likely end up ahead of schedule by getting multiple collectibles in one day and have days to spare. Though it is generally advised for new players to feel free to repeat days. If you didn't get a collectible, go ahead and reset. And when you unlock a new level, maybe spend a day exploring with the plan to reset when the day is over. That's all fine too. Then Pikmin 2 and Pikmin 3 time isn't that big of a deal. Pikmin 2 still has a day counter but has no limit, so it literally means nothing. Pikmin 3 does have a day limit (99 total), but no player will ever reach that in normal play. I did it in 36 days my first time but I played a lot of Pikmin before then, the average is somewhere around 50. So you don't have to stress out there either.
@@ninto55ssequesterrecording8 The question is more how meaningful you can make the timer. Save the world in fifteen minutes? Easy, has meaning. Stop the bomb on 00:07 in a Bond game, get a bonus, makes sense. Have a day timer for events because you want a timer because it's cool in your head and players will love it, not so much. It needs a purpose and a function. It strikes me that by reputation, Pikmin benefited from that generousity. It allowed you to explore the game and to have a bit of..... well, time to appreciate the sunset, so to speak. It had a very clear visual and thematic style. If you were burning through it, you can't really see it. Taking the time to see it on the other hand, you need to make the most of it, because it's not there forever. That to me is a valid function.
Surprised there was no mention of Shenmue - it and Dead Rising were the first two games to immediately jump to my mind. Probably one of the first and still one of few games with a real world time system where people and businesses would follow real schedules. Certain events would only happen on certain dates/times, but the game generally did a good job of making sure you knew where you needed to be for main story events.
This is the video which convinced me to play Outer Wilds, along with one of those other comments on a video essay about OW that said "seriously, if you saw the spoiler warning and HAVEN'T played the game, play it without any information." I trusted it and wow, it was crazy.
Hey Mark, awesome video, like always, I am still amazed of how much I learn in your videos. Your storytelling skills with video are getting better by the day! The mid-point loop back was genius. Congrats, keep the good work
I am a little sad (even if I get why) that you haven't mentioned my favourite game that use time: Ghost Trick Phantom Detective by **ing Shu Takumi. It's such a masterpiece ^^ A weird but still interesting game that use timed events and schedule is the spin-off DIsgaea Infinite. It's basically a investigation game, where the secondary gimmick is that you can possess various characters.
Pathologic! It’s hard to recommend a game this old and so broken in many ways, but still anyone who loves games and wants something unique shuold experience this. Its whole (huge!) storyline lives on different loops and timelines. Time here is a resource you have to manage among other resources, and it sucks you in like nothing else. It really makes you live in it.
I remember there's this JRPG for the PS2 called "Ephemeral Fantasia" (I had to look it up) where it also functions in real time. But I didn't really finish that game, so I can't say much. And then there's "Radiata Stories" (also a PS2 game), where the main story doesn't go on in real time, but the routines of potential party members does. Going to bed at night, going to school, working, researching.
Pathologic 2 is the best recent example of this: it all ends in 12 days. Days pass at a consistent rate, with quests and triggers only being available at certain times. Do you go oit to do your job, or run an errand for a friend? Will you still jave tine to scrape together enough barter for a heel of bread to get through the day wothout starving? You can miss things entirely, but the narrative is built around that idea, so you're never really 'lost'. You just soldier on. Makes it incredibly replayable too.
I think your videos are beautiful: your content is well researched but you pitch it at a level that can be grasped with relative ease, the sound design makes me feel like I'm transported into a different space (much like viewing a Studio Ghibli film) and your voice (both the tone and delivery) is so easy on the ears - without lacking personality. I love your work.
Majora's Mask is my favorite clockwork game, even after all these years. I think a game like Virtue's Last Reward or Zero Time Dilemma could technically count as clockwork games, since you need to make the decision to initiate the loop with information gleaned from one timeline to solve a puzzle from another. You even get to pick where you loop to. River City: Rival Showdown also has a non-looping clockwork system where the ending you get depends on the quests you do during the three days the game takes place over. It's an entirely real option to spend all three in-game days just sleeping or doing nothing of story importance. I'm a touch disappointed that Superhot didn't show up in this video, since the way it uses time is so unorthodox for its genre.
Pathologic 2 is such a great example for this topic, i expected u to get to it any minute, but u totally didn't... if you haven't already you MUST play it
Welp. That's it. I've officially watched every single video you've uploaded so far. I've been wanting to make games for years, but never knew where to start. Thanks to you, I have some idea on where to start and what direction to head. I appreciate everything you do hear, Mark. Thank you :)
In terms of ‘designing for disability’, or really just anyone with bad management skills, having a ‘time loop’ or reversal or some such non-permanent consequence system helps tremendously. It’s a blessing to have larger time spans to get to what we want to, and being able to hit the redo softens the blow without totally minimizing the impact of each action.
I'm pretty sure the Stalker series has some features like this. As in, if you don't go around completing missions, other characters/factions will complete them before you and you will lose out on them.
Final Fantasy Lightning Returns did this very well. You should try it. It has just enough time to do everything in the game, even if you miss something on one day, you may have a chance in the next. And that rush to finish the final dungeon as the days tick by is tense as hell.
I totally agree that adding time to open world games would really raise the bar. I loved the new Spider-Man game and wouldn't want to change it at all but I would be really interested to see one with clockwork mechanics built in. This might be my favorite of your videos so much because it made me realize how clockwork time and time loops might be one of my favorite mechanics. I can't believe how I haven't noticed it before as I frequently will say Majora's Mask is my favorite game of all time.
Mark, all of your videos are amazing, but this one in particular was just the best. You introduced new to so many awesome looking games, with the kind of mechanics I love to see. Thank you!
1:09 - Nitpick time! Outer Wilds is absolutely "interplanetary", but I wouldn't describe it as "interstellar" without some particularly tortured mental gymnastics.
Two other games in which time plays an extraordinarily deep role are The Long Dark and Pathologic 2. The Long Dark is all about time management, as you struggle against the elements and nature to accumulate the knowledge and resources needed to make that struggle last as long as possible. Pathologic 2 gives the player just a limited amount of time to save as many people in town as possible, or not, while racing against the rising tide of fear and pandemic, again forcing players to make difficult choices to optimize all possible outcomes. Interestingly, both of these games, and others like Don't Starve, are survival games, with the clock steadily ticking and life becoming more difficult if players don't learn fast enough or work hard enough or, manage their time well enough!
Crazy thought. A game where your save files are all different timelines and the game itself runs in real time. So for example if you hear that "X" is about to happen over at "Y", the game autosaves. At this point you can go about your merry way and do nothing, or you can go and stop X. However regardless of whatever you do, you will be starting a new save file in that timeline where you didn't do one thing, and the other save file will be sitting around if you want to try the other. This creates a giant branching save system where your actions and time both matter without consequently restricting one or the other. At least in theory.
Majoras' Mask hit it so hard out of the park. It seemed like almost two decades had to pass before anyone even dared to make a time loop game. These days developers are cranking them out, but, that long silence after MM really told me that at the time the breakthrough was world changing.
"for a coherent story" -- shows screen capture of Dead Rising with main player wearing horse head thing. *chef's kiss* excellent, I love it, more please
I can't be the only person who watches these videos not just for the content itself, but to see what games people suggest in the comment section... Also, Mark, that second intro was amazingly clever in the most "horrible pun" way. Thank you.
Elsinore is one of my favorite games! When I clicked on this video, I thought immediately of Elsinore but I was sure he wasn't going to mention it. I was very tickled to see it actually discussed!
Just a heads up Mark, but this was the video that sold me on Outer Wilds way back when this video released. It was released on PS4 around this point, I think. Thank you, Mark. Game of the Year, Game of the Decade (probably), throw every award at it.
Ghost Trick, Phantom Detective also does something similar, though on a much smaller scale. You can rewind time until 4 minutes before a person's death and try to prevent it.
The DXHR hostage 'twist' just felt like wank in practice, though. The first mission in the game goes 'these are the rules by which the world runs', makes a big show of it - and then never follows those rules again.
It kinda does, if you take too long in some areas, it has obvious effects. It's been a while since I played it, but if you take too long in defending the crashed chopper, Farida Malik will die. End of statement. They certainly could have used it more, that part I won't argue.
Way of the Samurai is great for this. Specific events happens all the time at diverse point in the small map of the game and it's up to you to show up. But you don't necessarily lose the game if you miss one of these, you'll just get a bad ending later. And you get to know what to do and when by following one character in particular for example. The satisfaction of actually figure things out to get the best storyline is amazing!
I'm just beginning to learn basic programming but i have a time-based concept i want to get good enough to make a test of, alongside other ideas. But basically this time idea is that you are an aquatic character (i chose an octopus) who uses life support to fight or platform on land - and that's the bulk of the gameplay - but the octopus has a magic water clock that only works when they get into water, but this is how you save the game, rewind time on your broken armor to fix it (losing life support is how you die, not getting killed), and return to previous levels where things don't need to be different unless the character does something different while there - water could be randomly placed in an open world or carefully placed on a linear one, but either way this barely changes mechanics in most games but i like how it reframes it in a diagetic way. I also thought about it as a way to make combat that is in between real time fighting and turn based fighting where the water clock can only save in water but if the octopus rleases ink onto it (like when threatened by an enemy) it slows time down putting you into a state where you know what move is coming from an enemy and have 6 choices (the octopus's non-walking arms can each hold a different weapon or shield) to react much slower than in a standard fighting game. I think the attacks would need to be complicated or hard to predict or chance based for this to be fun, but i imagine it could be fun with grounded, realistic melee weapon attacks (from enemies at least) with the ability for enemies to fake or feint or dodge and slash, etc. Itd make sense with the clock for this to be a timeloop where you can replay the same fight again and again so it can be super complicated but more streamlined and the time loop nature would be a deliberate story choice
