I loved you’re Qutoe “The war on drugs and terror didn’t work the war on Guns won’t work Too” not to mention Prohibition was a war on Alcohol and boom the Italian Mafia was selling it illegally
Yea so did my high school … in the 1950s … we don’t live in that world anymore. We don’t even live in the world of 20 years ago. We live here now and what used to work no longer works. You don’t go out and buy a new computer and install windows 95 on it do you ? The world is not the same place get a grip
HowItUsedToBe you are correct. The world is not the same anymore. In facts it's much much more dangerous and it has never been more important to carry a weapon than now.
For anybody who is curious, whenever you see a video of someone being tazed and they have no reaction to it, it's not because they "just ate it", it's because both of the prongs did not hit the target. Tazers require both of the prongs that are fired to hit the target for the tazer to actually take effect. It is actually quite common that both prongs don't connect on the first shot because of clothing on the target and other factors, so tazers are generally armed with two rounds because of this.
I was gonna say, from my limited experience with electronics as a mechanic, one of the only reasons a circuit would be finicky like that is a loose connection to the main source. So if the prongs don't punch correctly, it won't be as effective.
Its also why, in the event there is only one police officer on scene, a taser isn’t used. You should have lethal cover when using non lethals (simply because lethal has a better chance of keeping the officer’s safe).
Nah. He’s pro gun. NRA member. Just perpetuate the gun violence in our country and the mental patients that are able to easily access assault rifles to commit mass murders.
@@tonytrident8874 he did? Honestly I don’t really feel like watching all this business again, if anyone can elaborate and go into detail, I’d probably be willing to read.
@@tonytrident8874 Not to be a prick, but Colion is one of the most knowledgeable lawyers and 2A advocates on constitutional gun rights that uses his huge platform to spread awareness, education and facts. Just because he says he doesn't have DATA to back this up (poverty and gun violence) doesn't mean he's "making it up". He's merely pointing out that gun violence in the inner city ensures that local LA politicians and directors may need the problem to persist in order to justify their $260,000 salaries. It more than likely means that the data needs to be collated from an authoritative source like the FBI, ATF, CDC, etc. Which will never happen because there is a one party majority. It's like, why would you investigate the root cause if it meant fixing it was your a$$ and livelihood. Make sense?
1 DaveM Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zrfSK6pnpQ.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
anyone who believes in what your logic is they're thinking for themselves and are hero's anyone else..... obviously they're not thinking for themselves and are wrong. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡.
when you go buy a product from the store you look for that one doctor's recommendation who wasn't the 9 out of 10 doctor's that didn't recommend... "'bEcAUsE hEe ThIKns fOR hIMmSeLf " lmao
*In terms of gun related suicides....* As a Marine buddy of my told me, "If you're ever thinking about eating a Round, eat a mushroom instead; it's a heck of a lot healthier for the brain and the head." Shrooms legit save lives after the military.
@@BobRoss-wm3lc Yep that is an undeniable truth. Insane that there are so many Americans that ignore this fact. It seems as if they simply have no empathy for others and all that matters is their own enjoyment.
I remember seeing a map somewhere regarding U.S. gun violence, and it blew my mind that like six urban-suburban counties, and I want to say you could even break it down to cross streets of certain cities to look at shooting numbers, were where most gun homicides occurred. Wild stuff. But Noir is right.....if you're a politician, why do the work and improve your constituents lives when you can politicize and blamethrow? That goes for Dems and GOP on their respective lists of political footballs.
What's even crazier is that they all reside in the areas with the most strict gun control legislation in the country, too. There is a website dedicated to just tracking the gun violence in Chicago.
What specific steps does Noir think politicians should take to improve mental health and wealth inequality? Most of the same people who oppose gun control also oppose government spending on mental health and social services.
@@technewb8241 gun control doesn't work if you don't do it everywhere. It's like trying to pour water out of a boat filled with holes. That's why every country that has gun control does it nationally/federally.
As an electrician I can attest, getting hit by 277V is like someone hitting you with a baseball bat. It's much more dangerous than a taser. It will either knock you on your ass, or wake you up better than any coffee or energy drink ever will
@@Biggiiful always shut off the breaker to whatever you’re working on. I’m not a certified electrician but I’ve changed attic fans, outlets, light fixtures and I always shut off the breakers when I do anything involving electricity. People who do any electrical work with just turning off a switch are insane lol
@@rippindrummer666 and then check with a multimeter to make sure what you're about to work on is actually off, after you switch the breaker, just to be safe.
@@Biggiiful Shut everything off like rippindrummer said whenever I do electrical work with my pops in our properties we turn the whole house off via the breaker.
@@Biggiiful It's actually not that likely if you're safe and take all the proper safety protocols. I've been an electrician for 15 years now, and I've only been hit once. I was working on landscape lighting @ the Mandalay Bay in Vegas. I went to change out a bulb and got lit up because the fixture wire was exposed on the inside of the housing, and became energized. Went through my hand and grounded me through my knee. Hit me pretty good. It happens so fast you don't even realize what's happening til it's over. Grabs hold of you and contracts your muscles. We follow very strict OSHA safety precautions. We're actually never supposed to work on circuits that are energized, unless it's medical life support systems @ hospitals. And if we do those, we get suited up in arc blast suits. It's a good career man. Definitely don't be scared by electricity, once you learn how it works, you learn to respect it, and not fear it. We make good wages, good health benefits, and I have 2 pension plans through the IBEW Local 357(union).
We need young knowledgeable people who actually know their stuff running this country. Not old farts from a like a century ago who are so out of touch with everyday people. This guy is awesome
*Some* old farts. Most who I know are treasure troves of common sense, wisdom and knowledge and would be perfect for this country. We just happen to be currently stuck with a senile puppet.
One good thing about old people though, is that they've seen it all experienced it all. So they have an intuition if something is a waste of time or could work. Loads of wisdom. But that being said a bit younger I believe is helpful. like 40's & 50's
@@fleatactical7390 Unfortunately every older person I know are weird, their bodies are falling apart, and they are just really weird man. Even the ones I respect I can’t stand to be around for to long because of how odd they act.
Yet we elected a president who referred to black children as cockroaches and used the term Negro to describe black people. Look it up on here if you don't believe me.
@@CoolSmoovie if you didn’t know, as humans age their bodies breakdown from the wear and tear of life. Good healthy bodies don’t last a lifetime. It’s not the elderly who are weird and odd. It’s you. I’m sure you have beliefs that are completely unjustified and poorly thought out and do things without good reason or understanding. You are weird and odd because of them and people who believe and act with well reasoned perspectives seem weird and odd to you.
This is just a circle jerk...Two people of the same opinion rehashing why it's a good opinion. This is not the type of conversation about firearms America needs.
Sadly the only conversation we will hear from main stream media "no guns will fix thing" or "more guns will fix things". The fact that these people don't care about suicides proves that Media and Politicians are only interested in personal gain not the betterment of society.
1000% agree with Noir on the issue of poverty and mental health. Where I grew up in West Baltimore people who lived in old family houses often passed down from their grandparents were more likely to escape poverty and not be involved in violent crimes. That's not to say most didn't do crime, it was just that it was not necessary for people (myself included) to commit crime since we had access to basic things. However! the people who grew up in rowhomes and apartments were worse off! They were always committing crime and causing problems. Hell, one of my friends before he passed at 17 (SEVENTEEN!!) years old had the nickname "Felony" because the dude committed so many crimes that eventually the courts charged him as an adult. Ironically, he did not die by gang violence, he had MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES and shot himself. So I agree that there are so many problems with poverty and when you have mental health and/or mental illnesses or severe mental illness running in your family on top of that, it makes the situation worse. People in leadership always say "we need to talk about it" but then never take action needed to change these situations.
It doesn't seem fair to raise a child in hell and not expect mental health issues. Like the chicken and the egg, which came first? What causes poverty? The fastest track to the poor house is a single parent house. I suspect if we had healthier whole families, we'd have less poverty and less mental illness. Decades of numbers says that's true.
Yeah these days many kids start to sell drugs because it isn't worth for them to work a normal job since they don't make enough money compared to drug trafficking. It's interesting how instead of figuring ways to try to reduce prices and tax to make it easier for people to live, instead politicians just talk about it, just take more taxes, become rich, and do nothing about it. We don't only have gun crime go up, but every crime go up.
may have some truth but listen that is the new tag line. R's being screaming they coming for your guns boogie man shit my whole life. All while cutting access to basic services. Cutting benefits to Mental Health, medicaid, voting against min wage increases. I like guns own guns. I give 2 shits If I can buy an AR or if my 18 yo can buy one. Who givesa a shit. We all know what we were doing at 18. Hell you cant rent a car unless you 25 handgun 21. So the rest of this shit is all cap.
I think If they started charging drug dealers with the crime that drug dealing allways results in , "Murder" , that it would be a huge deterrent to involving yourself in those activities.
I don’t know about you but when I got my concealed carry permit I had to go to a shooting range and was tested for shot accuracy I had to take a three hour course of gun safety and basic understanding/ knowledge
I also had a 6 hr course and shooting test but only because I had to to legally ccw in my state. I was apposed to the process but after illegal ccw for 10 years I figured I had to much to loose. Im apposed because as Colin mentioned, its a constitutional right.. The second amendment does say you have the right to bear arms and does not say only if your local jurisdiction thinks you should. The biggest issue with ccw is putting ourselves on a list of people to confiscate firearms from when the ATF keeps redefining laws to include everyone. Registration *will* result in confiscate eventually. If not in my lifetime then my kid's lifetime. With how public schools and the main stream media has been brainwashing the mass population into gun hysteria there will be no 2nd amendment in a few more generations.
In Georgia we have “permitless carry”. It’s a new law but I’m pretty sure it applies to concealed carry. No class, no background check, and no license.
Can you imagine being forced to pass a class in order to speak to the public and you don't having your right to free speech taken from you and being thrown in jail because having a pod cast about guns is considered to dangerous?
@@beausannieoakleyposse7249 can you imagine being forced to take a written and skills based test to drive a car. Pretty soon they’ll take all our cars!
@@mattgrooms1853 you only have to take a written/driving test to drive on government roads. You can own and drive any car on your own property. You also do not have a "right" to a car like you do a firearm.
Thats sad. C.N. is an enemy of freedom and the rights of the people. And supoorts the very things that he claims to be against due to his own ignorance. Key indicators is "muh 2nd amendment rights", when the 2nd amendment doesn't grant rights. Its a restriction on government. Our rights are natural. "Law abiding citizen", yea if the founders were law abiding citizens there would be british flags in our front yards right now. C.N. openly supports cops. Cite where exactly in our constitution that "we the people" (which includes me) gave government the authority to police society. You can't because it doesn't exist. It doesn't exist because standing armies are the most dangerous cause to the rights of the people and freedom. Yet c.N. openly supports them. So is it that he knows something and is an enemy. He is ignorant and an enemy. Reguardless he is ignorant making the ignorant even more ignorant. While having them (you) support your own oppression
Education on guns seems like such an instrumental thing to do, regardless of where you're at on the matter of having/not having guns. Why is that not the first thing to consider?
Most of the states that even require CCW classes make you take them with awful instructors. Not to say you need to have been shot at, but if your instructor is NRA certified, weighs 340lbs, and has a SERPA holster, you're about to receive some horrible gear/legal/survival advice outside generic rules of gun safety.
@Ok Alright A lot of assumptions and baseless generalizations there. I don't even know what you're trying to say with the blue line/tread on me, 50/50 thing. Seems like your perception of "gun owners" comes entirely from reddit or something. I agree it would be nice if we could all hold hands and talk about this stuff rationally and without emotion clouding our judgement, could stick to just practicality and factual info... but that shit went out the window years ago. Idk what world you're living in to believe millions of people can be rational and respectful of other opinions/situations. The root problem is not guns, the root problem is the fact that our society pumps out people who would sh*ot up an elementary school. No rational, mentally stable, moral person would do that, no matter how many scary guns they own.
Its an amendment,which obviously been changed from the original draft so it can be changed. Its not normal in the 21st century to keep harping on about a piece of paper written so long ago..No other country on the planet has the violent crime/murder like yours and its high time you grew up and realised it.
Great clip of an amazing conversation. No quick sound bite, 30 second or 2 minute News interview. This is the way to talk about these things. Noir is a great advocate for the movement.
I have always been a gun control advocate. I’m a 71 year old white woman that have never held a gun. But I wanted to understand the other side. Thanks to you and Colton Noir and watching this podcast 2 times, I now understand! Thank you so much! I will never own a gun, and will just have to die if necessary (probably strong Mennonite/pacifist DNA in there) but I understand and truly support the gun advocates!
Thank you for getting out of your political comfort zone just to understand a topic better. We need more people like you in my generation. As a 21 year old I have no idea why people my age are so emotional and don’t think rationally or logically. Thanks Cheri!
Best serious video clip I’ve seen in years. “How to lie with statistics” is a real thing. Thank you both for having this conversation! It’s important that everyone knows accurate statistics and not intentionally misleading ones. Joe Rogan will never personally read this, but thank you for having real conversations that people care about, you are a gentleman and a scholar… I have more to say, but I’ll leave it there.
lyin with stats is only possible with ppl who cant think independently or critically. if u show me stats i usually always look at the stats seperate of what u say. if u say some shit like "We interviewed 1k people that played russian roulette. 100% survived." bro ill double take and call u out
There isn't anything remotely "serious" about having a literal paid shill for the NRA on to deep dive into the statistics and social analysis that he isn't at all qualified to authoritatively opine upon regarding gun violence in the US that the CDC literally described as a public health crisis. Rogan could have opted to actually have professional statitisticans and social scientists who specialize in this subject on...but that would be too much like "being the opposite of a raging idiot" for him and his producers.
@@Jsztke Not exactly true. Sound methodology, competency, and integrity of the research makes all the difference...and even then the work and its results must be subjected to rigorous peer review. This is why The Right created "Think Tanks" to circumvent the process because they know it was the only way to at least appear that their bullshit had a veneer of academic rigor
When it comes to self-perpetuating government, it's not just gun violence - it's the entire Prohibition machine. There are VAST amounts of money flowing to maintain the current status quo in the War on Drugs. There are entire government agencies whose existence depends on the War on Drugs continuing, not to mention all the NGOs and other organizations that depend on Federal anti-drug money.
Truth. Just like rogan bringing up the cottage industry surrounding "fighting homelessness" guarantees homelessness will never be dealt with, because there is too much money to be made pretending to fight it, the "War on drugs" won't ever be won, because there is too much incentive for the gvmt to keep it up. They will loose trillions in their dept budgets if they ever actually stopped drugs from being sold and used in the US. It's kinda funny, that we all know how much money the Columbian and Mexican cartels make selling drugs, something to the tune of 100 billion a year, but that pales in comparison to how much money the FBI and DEA and DHS and state and local gvmts have spent on fighting those drugs. Drug dealers and smugglers and criminal gangs made literal fortunes with drugs, but the US gvmt has taken tens of trillions from taxpayers to pretend they're fighting it. Someone is making money using prohibition as their excuse for sure, but it's not who you'd expect it to be.
The crazy thing about all that is movies are being (and have been) made about how government organizations use drug money to fund their wars. It's common knowledge at this point. Yet these organizations still exist and are allowed to continue doing what they've been doing. Americans don't care enough to do anything about it, or hold our politicians accountable.
Yep…. The cocaine trade over the US-MEX boarder is worth a estimated 60-100 billion a year…. The corruption goes deep… you would be kidding yourself if the so called elite are not involved… all that tax free coin… the richest people in the world control the drug trade.. the cartels are the bogeyman.. bait and switch…
I think one of the things missed is the "prolonged exposure to poverty" may actually be the most influential: those in poverty, especially cities (so this can sort of explain why West Virginia isn't as violent), is lead exposure. We know biologically that lead exposure decreases not only IQ, but also decision making skills. Removal of lead from gasoline has been shown to reduce crime ~20 years later everywhere it has happened by a significant amount (this is why crime in the US dropped substantially in the 1990s, for instance). I'm generally anti-government intervention, but if government can actually improve lives somewhere, it would be cleaning up lead in inner cities.
watch a special on leaded gasoline they said the guy who put lead in gasoline killed more people than anyone ever in history stuff was deadly some amazing stats and facts in that show
1 Kalasmourn Rex Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zrfSK6pnpQ.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Government intervention on stuff that enhances capitalism is never a bad thing. Crime only further suppresses capitalism. This is why regulation that doesnt deal with environmental protection or property rights is wrong.
@@dr._breens_beard so you think that extremely rich corporations buying up a shit ton of houses and then jacking up all the rents is a good thing? That's capitalism as we know it in the USA. I'm not saying it's bad. But let's face facts. At the end of the day corporate Giants have now interest in keeping more and more of their profits rather than sharing it with their employees who work to get them that wealth. Common sense that eventually that's going to cause the economy to become as it is now. And steadily get worse and be as fragile as it is. Things like the recession don't affect the Uber rich, only the poorer, working class. Share the wealth more and you'd see a much much happier society. I promise you that. Ppl are just absolute miserable anymore and it's because most ppl are struggling paycheck to paycheck and assholes just say shit like you should try harder or get a better job. It's not always that simple.
Colion Noir is an amazing 2A advocate. I found him about two years ago and I got my husband to watch him. He's intelligent and is doing great things for gun owners all around the United States.
@@replexity really? what has he done for 2a other than give speeches for money while the common man has to fight thru Hella restrictions for a simple handgun. I'll wait
@@ReanuKeevesAus Probably a "don't confuse me with facts" anti gun derp who didn't even watch it. He supported everything he said with easy to verify stats.
And since he is in Texas it is a must for Colionm to be available to be on a platform like JRE where he can reachest not only the largest audience, but rather a diverse group politically, economically, and in all other respects. I am extremely thankful for Joe getting him on. I only hope Colion does better at sticking on the topic and not focusing on the real issues like guns aren't the problem, gun laws won't help, & that it is a societal sickness as well as pharmaceutical "side effects", & if we want this fixed it will take at least a generation of serious work as we try to rebuild our society back into something that values human life, individual freedom, self worth (& not this fake BS woke culture has come up with) & mutual respect.
@@Makabert.Abylon your rhetorical question does nothing to push your argument. School shootings aren’t even a major portion of gun homicides, let alone gun deaths: inner city gang violence amongst very specific communities (with strict gun control laws) and suicide are the contributors to gun deaths, and people like leftist politicians and advocacy groups extrapolate such data to scare the public into making guns the problem when they’re not. But please, enlighten me because I “really don’t see it.”
He's a straight up propagandist conman. But that's literally the only type of person Rogan invites on the show these days, so it shouldn't' be very surprising.
I remember that guy at the 7 eleven which was shot on film of a guy assaulting him and then going after him more while the guy was on the ground and the prosecuted tried arguing the attacker was retreating. Sometimes you can do everything right and still get charged. Ridiculous.
A woman in Massachusetts was criminally charged and ended up doing time for shooting a burglar. The reason? She could have retreated and escaped through her back door which was locked, dead bolted and braced from the inside. Imagine in a high stress situation how long it would have taken her to dismantle the brace assembly, release the deadbolt, unlock the door and run away. That's how ridiculous laws are in New England in general. In Massachusetts one has to apply for a permit to carry mace which is awarded on a 'may issue' and not a 'shall issue' basis.
He can retreat all he wants but if he is still armed he is an active threat...and let's not forget that he is posessed of free will and could change his mind , turn and come back to continue the job.coming at you or going away, if armed that person represents an active threat and that threat must be neutralized.period.
If this is the incident where the older gentleman had a dispute with a younger guy because he parked in a handicapped spot, the older gentleman was in the wrong. His judgment may have been clouded because he was probably afraid and his adrenaline was high in the moment, but as soon as he pulled his gun out, the guy that was attacking him started walking away... and he shot him anyway. As Colion said in the video, there is a very thin line between justified and unjustified, and looking at the video, it was not a justifiable shooting. Had he still been attacking him when he shot him, it would be a different story, but since the guy started walking away when the gun was pulled out, it's no longer a defensible argument to say he shot him in self-defense, because the attack was over and the offender was retreating. The point in using a gun (whether just brandishing or firing to stop someone) is to end the threat. The threat was over when the guy started walking away; you can't just shoot him because you're upset he attacked you. Like I said, maybe he was caught up in the moment, but in the video, there is a very distinct pause between when he was being attacked, when he pulled out the gun, when the attacker walked away, and when he fired, and that's why he was charged.
If you want to see the desired trajectory of the gun control advocates, just take a look at Canada. There are just more obstacles for them to get through here in the United States.
Yet Canada doesn't have teenage psycos shooting up schools. Neither does the UK, France, Netherlands, Australia or pretty much any other western country EVER. Because when it happened we DID SOMETHING!
@@super00su NO, every small town in Canada everyone owns guns, mostly long rifles. To the point that these new rules effect VERY few actual gun owners in Canada.
Great conversation ! If only we could get people to open up at least enough and listen to conversations like this. Unfortunately people have been so programmed into tribalistic ideas that they stay willfully ignorant on subjects such as this.
The bit about the homeless and inner city violence reminds me of a passage from one of Thomas Sowell's books. He describes how government subsidies corrupt altruistic community projects. Imagine a small neighborhood organizes the cleanup of a filthy lot in their area. The government steps in and provides funding for the cleanup effort, including a small salary for the organizers for the duration of the cleanup. What they've just done is financially incentivized the organizers to draw out the duration of the cleanup effort so they can pull from the government subsidy longer. One can easily imagine such a person, community-oriented and diligent, who nonetheless does some quick math and realizes if they milk the cleanup effort for just one or two extra weeks, the extra salary will help put their kids through college down the line.
How the f*ck do you lay a murder charge on someone who retaliates with force to an AK-47 pointed at him while simultaneously trying to ban "assualt rifles" because they're such a threat to human life? ?
For the record an AK-47 and AR-15 aren't assault rifles. They aren't even rifles. They're carbines. You can literally look up rifles vs carbines on RU-vid.
Jose Garza. Political DSA member DA who was funded by Soros. All part of the, "you should let people terrorize you as long as we, the status quo seems it acceptable, and you will bend over and say 'thank you sir can I have another.'" If you look on that case, an assistant DA resinged in protest because Garza withheld evidence of this case to the Grand Jury to propel a charge. There was alot of inside baseball with this case.
@@savageboxing1402 I quote right from the Ak-47 wiki page Kalashnikov "In 1944, he entered a design competition with this new 7.62×39mm, semi-automatic, gas-operated, long stroke piston carbine, strongly influenced by the American M1 Garand." See the word Carbine in bold. The ak-47 has always been a carbine and not a rifle. But also understand there is no such thing as an assault rifle. It's a word that doesn't have a real definition because it wasn't invented by gun people. It more of a hot phrase.
the fact a 17 year old can have a gun but you cant drink until your 21?? that seems backwards to me. whether that applies across different states, its still stupid.
@@7eis drinking should be lowered to 18. It literally makes no difference in the Uk. Even make it 25 for a gun license, or even just scrutinised more. It works in the Uk. You can’t be insured on some vans until you’re 30 in the Uk. Nobody bats an eyelid.
I've always wondered why suicides are listed in the gun stats under gun violence... suicides aren't" violence ". a suicide is, a violent thing, but the definition they are using when collecting gun violence statistics isn't the same definition. to be violent is a description, whereas violence is an action, a verb. I feel like there's no other reason to include suicides with the rest of the data , than just to pump up the numbers on paper. perhaps it affects government funding on some level or something? honestly, just no idea.
@@alexsawicki1721 - Right, exactly. Bladed murders are a nightmare for law enforcement, considering blades don't leave behind residue, or leave bullet casings or impact trajectories, etc. You also can't trace a knife back to it's owner either. It's for no other reason than because politicians simply fear them. The government would be thrilled if guns were taken away, because an unarmed populace is an obedient populace. Just look at how the UK and Australia treat it's citizenry for example. COVID was a godsend in a way, because it provided a relatively harmless virus that ultimately showed the government's true colors. It allowed the Mask to be removed momentarily, and the stark difference between how those other governments handled and treated their populations vs how the US approached theirs, speaks VOLUMES. And the single, solitary difference between these populations comes down to: GUNS. The US population is heavily armed, the others are not. Which is exactly why the US government never really went any further than declaring "guidelines" and "suggestions" and "policies". Those other countries just straight up MANDATED and ORDERED their populations, going so far as to build encampment zones and even jailing certain people. It's spooky how fast the illusion of "democracy" crumbles when the government has no reason to keep up appearances.
1 Carl Jefts Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zrfSK6pnpQ.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
The comparison of "comprehensive testing" cars vs guns is strictly constitutional. There cannot be a "test" for rights, lest we assume such "qualifications" test could also be applied to such things as voting, and other similar rights.
I agree there should be no test for voting (or any constitutional rights), but we’d probably be in a much better situation if people actually had to have knowledge of what they were voting for…
@@WindyCity1014 like what specifically? Voter ID? Which is a more racist stand. A. Voter ID is needed to insure all citizens votes count equally. Or B. Voter ID is racist because "some" people are (to stupid) to find the DMV or have and know how to use the internet to obtain IDs accepted to vote? Sorry, voter ID is used in nearly every country,... so how do feel this is a problem for "some" citizens? If that is your belief.
In answer to the taser question, modern tasers work on the theory of Neuromuscular Incapacitation, the greater the spread on the probes, the more muscle mass that's affected. This combined with the pain, is better capable of incapacitating a subject that older generations or stun guns...which merely operate on pain compliance. If a person appears to be unaffected, it's typically because the 2nd probe hasn't made contact, or potentially illicit substances are a factor.
1 Michael McAuliffe Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zrfSK6pnpQ.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Note on the taser bit: no one really "resists" tasers. Old ones, maybe, since they worked more on pain compliance, but the modern ones literally turn your control over your muscles off because they attack your nerves dorectly. There's no way to fight it, regardless of drugs. Now, the reason they don't always work is because tasers require a specific set of conditions to work properly: A) the barbs have to pierce clothing and make it into the skin. No body contact = no work B) the barbs have to land close enough together to overcone the natural electrical resistance of the human body. If they land too far apart, they can't complete the circuit and thus no effect. Both of those conditions HAVE to occur at the same time in order for a modern taser to work. Ian over at Forgetten Weapons has an excellent video on the subject.
The placement of the probes depends on how well the tasers work. The closer together the probes are, the less effective it is. The wider spread will take people down.
The taser electrodes need to go in specific spots to incapacitate the person. If youre wearing thick clothes or the electrodes dont make contact in the right place it becomes a pain compliance tool rather than involuntarily incapacitating the person like it does under ideal conditions and elecrode placement. No-one can override a taser under ideal conditions. Its high failure rate is caused by incorrect placement or lack of penetration of the electrodes due to thick clothes.
I've been around guns my whole life did lots of hunting and was on a trap team in highschool the number one rule I was always taught is to NEVER point a gun at something you don't intend to shoot it's common sense honestly lack of gun education is crippling this country I know some families and individuals hate them but we should all learn to operate a firearm safely regardless because they are here and I garuntee no government will EVER take them from American citizens
We need gun safety back in schools like we had up until recently. It could be put into a health class or PE requirement and wouldnt even take that long. I remember having to do track, tennis, flag football, golf, frisbee golf, volley ball, and more, so why not add a gun safety requirement. The extent that I had gun safety in school as a 22 year old was like 10 mins of a DARE program which was when police came in during elementary school to teach about how drugs and alcohol was bad. What they did was just say guns are dangerous dont touch them and get an adult if you see one and tell.
Hell yeah us gun owners need to stop trusting these shit eating republicans too and remember that Reagan passed the most restrictive gun laws of any US president but gun loving conservatives still look up to him! Both sides are the same amount of lies and bullshit.
They are slowly eroding the 2A. Read the dissenting opinions on some of the recent 2A Supreme Court rulings. All they need are the numbers and it’ll be revoked. Never rest on your laurels and think it would never happen.
The part about the taser brought back a fond memory. I was working at a prison and was learning about the stun gun. The instructor told me to grab his arm. He pressed it against my fore arm. I fought it for about 7 seconds. It felt like my muscles were doing waves. It was painful but I fought it. It sucked hard. The point is: Theres no end all. Drugs can make people super human. Some people can just fight through the pain. Its a false sense of security. Just like carrying a gun. The only sure fire method of ending a confrontation is a rocket launcher. Lol.
If someone gets hit with a taser and they just stand there, it’s a bad connection between the probes. As a former cop, I have never seen anyone withstand a good connection from a taser. No matter how tough, high, drunk, etc… it has to do with a good connection. Which is hard to get.
The problem with Tasers is unless you get a good spread with the darts you might not be able to immobilize the target fully. Especially if the darts are not fully penetrated into the skin of the subject. This is why the taser while being a good non-lethal weapon is useful, it really depends if you got a good shot on the subject.
Tasers do not have the deterrent effect of a firearm. If you are being home invaded your taser will be useless. Also, predators who are on a mission to commit a crime already have the advantage of mentally and physically preparing for action. Most intended victims have no clue what is about to go down while the criminals body is pumped full of adrenaline possibly mitigating some of the effects of a Taser.
the sad part is this conversation needs to be had at the federal level and in front of the public so the public can truly see the agendas behind the decisions being made by our government. there is no blanket cause or answer in relation to gun violence and removing them from law abiding citizens will never be the answer. the 2nd amendment is not in place just so we can have guns but to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. there just happens to be other benefits that follow
1 Kory Hay Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zrfSK6pnpQ.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
I always think about the tyrannical government arguement because an M16 is gonna do sweet fuck all against a predator drone or tank. I don't think it'll be a fair fight against the people vs military with today's technological advancements
@@cyberlee legally it doesn't matter where u shoot someone its WHY. If a guy has a gun on u and is robbing you then turn away to robb the man next to you and your able to draw your weapon unseen your completely legal to shoot the robber anywhere you can, back included.
I've seen the videos Colion is talking about. When he was first asked how many rounds he fired. Colion swore up and down he fired 3, in reality he fired 8. But telling the cop that one little incorrect detail can ruin anything else you say. Always plead the 5th and get a lawyer.
The NRA used to be all about gun owner education. That was their main goal. I agree that gun education should be basic for kids in households with or without guns and adults with guns. I wasn't shocked, but I was pretty surprised at the level of basic gun competency among the people in my concealed carry course a few years ago. It was pretty abysmal. I am still relatively new to pistols and definitely was at the time, but spent months getting familiar with the gun and the muzzle difference alone, doing dry fire pistol draw and holster drills and live fire before I ever signed up. If we're serious about our guns and gun ownership that has to be a part of it. Whether it's sanctioned or supplemented or subsidized by taxpayers or funded privately or through established, standardized 'shooting clubs,' I really think there is some discussion for that. I don't want it to be a monetary burden, but people need to take the time to know their gun(s) - through dry fire and live fire drills and the opportunity to advance with scenario-based training.
Sounds like Switzerland where everyone is educated in guns and few of these types of crimes, however it’s forced military. In the USA people don’t want that, they want to play cowboys.
I don’t think it’s necessarily poverty. I’m one of these inner-city kids. What kept me away from that life were my parents. Good parenting is key. I know plenty of poor kids that grew up to do great things.
We have atleast 2 major sources of gun violence. One from gangs and the other from mental illness. Gangs seem to proliferate in poor areas. Anyone can have mental illness. I agree poverty alone is not the whole problem. And good parents are definitely part of the solution.
@@SiccDeville Again, I don’t think that’s necessarily true. Myself and the “plenty” of other people made it out because we had people who cared for us. How are kids going to make it out of these inner cities if they have no one to guide them? I am, who I am, because somebody loved me. Some kids unfortunately didn’t get the parental guidance they needed.
Everyone in America needs to listen to two idiots? This clown said Canada was "a part of England". Firstly, England isn't a sovereign nation. Its part of the UK and Canada is a separate country to the UK and a sovereign nation. He also claimed the Queen makes all of Canada's policies. Canada has its own parliament, Prime Minister and executive. So, no. No one with an IQ above 60 should listen to these fools.
If the rest of you haven't subscribed to Mr. Noir yet, please do. The gun community on RU-vid is so full of useful information. You'll develop a new respect for responsible gun use and what the 2nd Amendment is really all about.
Well, no you won't. Its the ignorant driving those whobare more ignorant. The 2nd amendment is a restriction on government. Period. It doesn't grant a right or anything else to the people. Our rights are natural. Colion is as much an enemy of freedom and the rights of the people as those he claims to be against yet supports.
Amen his RU-vid channel is informative 👍 Regardless of your political affiliation You have God given rights in this country. Regardless if your left-wing or right-wing the same damn bird that's going to take whatever flight pattern they've planned. Americans we have a duty to correct it 🙏🇺🇲
Lmao most gun owners aren't responsible. That's the problem. Been around guns all my life and most I've seen do not know how to be responsible or care to learn. They just want to go bang bang
I've been tazed actually in a hospital bed because I had a reaction to pain medicine that they administered but long story short I was tazered and both prods went in pretty far and it just made me even madder, I was just in car accident and wanted my phone, nurse came in the room mad at the hospital police and said she'd have to cut them out because they couldn't remove the prods so I just yanked them out. Of course hospital administration deemed it necessary, if any lawyer wants to go to bat over it just comment your credentials below.
1 T. J. Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zrfSK6pnpQ.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Something I've always wondered personally... If guns are what's causing mass shootings, why do so many countries that allow legal gun ownership have so few mass shootings by comparison? Like Finland and Canada both have legal gun ownership, but they basically never have anything like what the US has. It points me in the direction of something else, and personally, I think it's a combination of many things, and guns are just the easiest target.
I think they might have different restrictions/laws so that could play a factor. Canada is going a bit far tho they either already did or are about to pass a law that stops anyone from buying a handgun
@@SomeOne-lx8zx they are trying to increase restrictions yes, and the requirements of owning a firearm are extensive in Canada. But at the end of the day, if you're deranged enough to want to kill people at random, then does it actually make a difference if you're legally required to keep bullets and the firearm in separate places, or always have the firearm locked away when at home (in a safe) or not have a legal right to self-defense with a firearm? You're not necessarily seeking to be a law-abiding citizen at that point.
In Canada the style of Guns you can have is limited and the way you need to transport and store your weapons are pretty different from the US. You need to keep ammo and the gun in separate safes, need to get permission from the local police when you intend to transport the weapon, even if you're going to the range or moving. As for the mass shooting in the US that's a pretty American centric problem due to a number of factors such as lack of mental health treatment, culture and the fact that its very easy to get weapons there compared to other parts of the world, especially depending on which state you're in. Guns are the easy target because they are the weapon of choice for these crazy people to use and have one real purpose and that's to kill. why does anyone need and AR for home defense, a hand gun or shot gun can do just fine. I'm not against guns but still some common sense needs to be had.
Because places like Canada don’t cover every incident. There are plenty of mass killings in Canada. Some are even committed with guns. They focus on gun violence and ignore all the other violence.
Finland and Sweden have a very high amount of guns per Capita, and also very tight regulations on what you can do, how to store, and how to transport guns. People really need to read up on those countries laws before using them as a straw man.
Update re: Canada... Handguns are restricted firearms - you need pass a course, background check, and then get a license and must belong to a gun club... Your handgun MUST be kept locked, unloaded, without ammunition in close proximity, in your home or range - To transport that gun anywhere, you need to apply for an "Authorization to Transport" each and EVERY time you move that gun from local police or Provincial Chief Firearm Officer (RCMP) - it has time and location restrictions, get caught in the most minor breach, you go to jail...If you target practice on your own private property (handgun or rifle outside of hunting season), you go to jail - ONLY place you can discharge a weapon is at the range or hunting...... THERE is NO CC whatsoever in Canada for citizens... That's the Reader's Digest version, but many, many more restrictions...
9:10. This needs no evidence, it’s just true. Knowing Social Services, there always is a need unfortunately. Colion is top in my book. Love the content.
It all depends on what state you live in. In Maryland if you're in your own home and somebody breaks into your house and they have a gun. and they're shooting at you. you also have a gun, but you're at the back door and you shoot and kill them. you can be charged with second degree murder because (supposedly) you could have escaped. Now say you're in Louisiana. They have a stand your ground law. Meeting if someone is out the harm you and you feel your life is in danger or your property is in danger like say if somebody's trying to rob you you're allowed to stand your ground and usually the force. It's crazy that the guy in Texas got charged because in Texas. You can shoot somebody just for showing up on your property if you tell them to get off your property and they don't leave you have the right then to defend your property with deadly force you also have the right to defend other people's property and other people's lives in Texas with deadly force. So it's crazy that guy got charged in Texas.
No, bud. The crazy bit is, that is even a reality in your country! That's the crazy bit. I mean, what are all us Europeans doing that means that DOESN'T happen in our countries?
@@davewillisporter If you think break-ins are not happening in European countries, you are disconnected from reality on a level I can't begin to comprehend.
In Texas it depends on the situation (sadly). I'm not an expert, but I do know there is a difference between property and premises/domicile, legally speaking. The example I have heard is that someone stealing your tractor out of your barn is not covered whereas someone actively ingressing through a door or window on your house is covered since that is the place you domicile in. Someone else can correct me with better terminology/situations if they want. **Edit: Finished the video and realize they were referring to Garrett Foster. I am unclear on how the vehicle defense argument works since it's a vehicle. Note to self to brush up on that topic.
@@davewillisporter You’re clearly not a fan of history and have also had a comfortable life. And to that, I say, good for you. But for those that have lived a life full of risk, at no fault of their own, self defense is essential to life. Those that live on high hills and behind security gates, stop the punching down. Get in the muck with us.
@@rucker69 they also have the Castle law in Texas you know like your car is an extension of your home. You're allowed to defend it and you're also allowed to deny cops from searching it without a warrant. I lived in Texas for over 20 years. In Texas you know if you have a fence up around your property. That means no trespassing, also if you have a purple ring around a tree or something on your property or around a pole means no trespassing. or if the top part of the poles are painted purple. that also means no trespassing in Texas. It's crazy and I guess it all depends on how you interpret the law. And everybody interprets it differently. I guess like in this case in Austin it also depends on the district attorney.
Love Noir, knowledgeable and educating people who are lied to about guns. Stop calling it gun violence just like we don’t call it knife violence or hammer violence.
When people commit suicide by hanging themselves, it should from now on be called "rope violence", since the gun-control crowd always includes suicides-by-gun in their "GUN VIOLENCE!!!" statistics (in order to massively inflate the numbers).
@@ianmorgan6116 except guns aren’t a significant issue. Out of like 300 million people in the US, there are like 12k gun deaths per year and half of them are from suicides. That’s nothing.
@@tomberver1075 it is a leading cause of preventable death in the US (it is in the top 10), and is approaching a leading cause of death generally (meaning it lies just outside of the top 10). If it was insignificant like you are suggesting, this wouldn't be a conversation, but it is significant and it does warrant discussion and government intervention in the form of regulation.
As a British man, owning and carrying a gun with the potential to kill anyone is so scary, literally puts me off visiting the US knowing that a gun can be pulled on me where in the UK, there is next to no chance of ever seeing one apart from on swat team
Depends on where you go. Don't go where thugs, gangs and cartels are known to be and you will never run into that situation. People who love guns and abide by the law don't want to lose their right to protect themselves. The last thing they'll do is randomly try to shoot you. It's the criminals you need to be scared of
I was gonna sell my guns back to the government but after a quick background check, not only did I find the buyer was extremely unqualified, they had a history of violating the law and were extremely mentally unstable. Too big of a safety risk. Keep your guns where they are safe. In your own hands
That's very convenient of your to assume I have the mental health level required to own guns 😂 the fact is many Americans are unqualified for gun ownership and thus should be disqualified...it sure as hell shouldn't be easier to get than a driver's license.
