There's a general consensus that the JV-1080 sounds better than the 2080. But, honestly, they're so close in this comparison that the differences are really irrelevant.. All three of them sound pretty much the same.
Congrats! That’s almost a gift! So much sound for little money. One of my favourite sounds is from the internal Session Card, Patch 67 - a nylon guitar sound and when using the sustain pedal you hear fingers gliding over the strings. Awesome! Enjoy that unit!!
@@theMIDImaniac Thanks! On the topic of JV-1010... What's the Windows software to use if I want to fiddle around with the sounds? Googling for it is somewhat confusing, as I find software that seems related and/or similarly named (Ctrlr, JV PatchEd, JV-XP Editor..). I was looking for a "Jump" sound - found one pretty close, but I would need to tweak the sustain... Thanks in advance for any tips you may have!
I bought mine for $50 :) I accidently dropped it from a storage over one of my closets, straight into a hard floor. The paint rubbed off at the side and left a little dent in the floor. Still worked and nothing came loose :) So I guess I am lucky
@@larslengberg The most usable one IMHO is still the original SoundDiver editor that came bundled with the JV-1010. Surprisingly, it works on Win10. I think that version is still on some user's page on the net somewhere.
Thumbs up on the production quality (camera, audio, lighting and content), the video inserts for each of modules being played and the overall looks of your studio - all is uplifting
I still recommends JV-1080! I have that module and it is still the best choice. JV-1080 is well balanced between features, expandability, and sound quality. For sound quality JV-1080 is the best, more fat, more smooth. But you may choose JV-2080 if: - You are crazy for the SR-JV80 expansion boards and want a module with more slots to fit, rather than JV-1080. - You like experimenting, mixing, outragerous editing and make something amazing until your friends will ask, "are you nuts?!" LOL - You like to orchestrate all MIDI channels with multitimbral feature... of course 1010 and 1080 are able to do so, but 2080 has more and more thanks to it's 8x expansion. - You are a big spender and like to jealous other musicians around you, or if you like to look cool on the stage. Or you may choose JV-1010 if: - You desire for JV-1080 or 2080 sounds at a valuable price. - You just want to have fun, just want to play. No editing necessary. - You like computer games with MIDI feature and would like to have a better GM sounds with a taste of JV sounds. - You don't want to get more space on your desk for a huge rack module, or always mobile but lightweight to go around, because JV-1010's size is as equal as Roland SC-55mkII, Roland SC-88, or legendary Roland MT-32. - You don't care for the expansions, you only focus to have a single SR-JV80 board, whatever your choice. You are a pianist? Choose SR-JV80-03 Piano. You like vintage sounds? Choose SR-JV80-04 Vintage Synth or SR-JV80-08 Keyboards 60s 70s. You want to have more multitimbral pop sounds? Choose SR-JV80-01 Pop, SR-JV80-07 Super Sound as the addition to SR-JV80-09 Session included in JV-1010. The choice is yours.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to listen and to comment. At that moment I had all three of them (Bought the 2080 and sold the 1080) and I thought 'let's compare NOW! :D'. Yes, the difference is minimal to my ears. Soon I will post another comparison with two machines, a cheap one and an expensive one ;-)
I'm obsessed with JV series sounds. I use em all the time - those, and one little secret weapon from e-mu vintage keys plus ;) stringwheel. Great video, thanks
That's an awesome comment! Thanks for that. Yeah, the 1010 is an awesome machine. It offers so much sound. And the 880 is a great unit too. I love the sound of it a lot. I sold the 880 though and now I have the 990 and the way it sounds is equal to me. Very deep and wide. Thanks for passing by and taking the time to drop a message. Have a good one!
Very difficult to tell any difference between the three, at least to my ears. The minor differences in sound might as well be a result of small changes in the performance between each take? (No offense:-)) What I DID notice, thought, was that soundwise, the 1010 is very close to its bigger brothers, despite being a cheaper, cut-down version with limited editing possibilities. Great playing, I'd love to see more JV videos like this! Thanks for sharing.
flimbosquest thank you for your great comment and no, I don’t feel offended. You’re right about the JV-1010. Much cheaper and sounds terrific. I will do another comparison with the JV-1010 and another even bigger brother. Let see the difference between those two. Stay tuned ✌🏽✌🏽
I thought all three boxes sounded really good. Differences are extremely subtle - the JV-2080 might be a little clearer, the JV-1010 has a little more sparkle to some of the sounds, and the JV-1080 is perhaps a little grittier. If you played more than one sound at once, there is no way you could honestly tell the difference between them. I got a JV-1010 recently, and it holds up perfectly well to the bigger brothers.
I got a 1010 when it came out,then bought an FA06 at least 15 years later only to discover a load of presets still were the same.I also have zenology which has loads of the old reliable Roland presets.Great video,sound quality is excellent
Thank you for sharing this comparison. Trying to decide which of these units I am going to get. Something about the 1080 that keeps calling me. Awesome comparison production!
It sure is. I do a lot of reggae From the V.I and predancehall stage Jamaica 🇯🇲 Bob Marley , Steel Pulse,UB 40 Peter Tosh Bunny Wailer, St. Croix V.I MidNite Band Akae Beka Ron and Vaughn Benjamin styles of reggae and Jazz Blues Rock 60s and 70s hammonds B3 Vox and Wultzer Steinway Pianos Fender Rhodes Suitcase Pianos Mellotronic Synths too Clavi s and all
Fantastic video! I have a JV-1010 and many times I read and listen that JV-1080 has a better sound than JV-1010. After listen carefully your video is possible say that is not true! To me JV-1010 and JV-1080 have absolutelly same sound. To my ears JV-2080 is a little brither and clean sound than your predecessors. Thank you so much. This video is was I looking for a long time!
Leandro Cleto Thank you for passing by and taking time to watch, listen and comment. The JV-1010 is an amazing and underrated synth. It has all sounds of the JV-1080 and JV-2080 + the Session expansion. I love the guitar patches of the Session Card (69/70/71) Thanks again! 💪🏽👌🏽✌🏽🤙🏽
A sugestion for new video in your channel: Roland JV-880 x (JV-1080 and JV1010 with JV-80 Patches ). Recently I load in "User Area" of my JV-1010 the patches of JV-80 (1-64-User). How the patches are the same of JV-880 (User) was possible compare these two units JV-880xJV-1010. As I readed and heard before, I can confirm that JV-880 have fuller sound when comparede with my JV-1010. JV-880 have a fantastic sound!!!! Think in this possibility since will be very useable for many folks and certanly your video production will be fantastic! If you need I can send to you a sysex file with JV-80 sounds to load in your JV-1010 and I think that will work on JV1-1080 as well. Thanks a lot!
Leandro Cleto thank you so much for the suggestion. I think you’re right about that topic buuuuuut....I sold my 880 & 1010. That’s why I made this video just before sending away the machines. I bought the 2080 because of the 8 card slots but I notice sound difference. And yes, the 880 sounded very warm. Grtzzz, Roger
This video is one of the reasons why I bought my 2080. After getting my hand on it I have the following opinion: The JV 2080 is a great workhorse. Easy to use minus some strange workflow in the UI. But the Rev and Chorus are crap beyond redemption and always off when I work with it. The EFX section is very nice most of the time. But I prefer the sound and stereo image of an 880 or 220 over the JV 2080. The big advantage of the JV 2080 is the 8 expansion slots and the direct access to all patches on the expansions. But soundwise it is not that great in comparison to a YAMAHA EX5. Which, of course, is riddled with the "Resource full" problem of the DSPs in multimode. Together they make a great combo. I recommend the following: If you are for a fuller sound experience, go for a JV1080. If you want the main workhorse, choose a JV2080. But be prepared to swap out or layer the sounds when doing a production with another better synth like the EX5.
Can you please explain more about the difference between the 1080 and the 2080, especially in terms of effects? I don't plan to buy any extra cards but do plan to buy some 3rd party patch libraries, specifically ones by LFO Store and Don Solaris. I'm mostly interested in pads and textural stuff. I plan on using the multitimbral and route sounds out all of the outputs, so the layers can be panned in a surround sound field. You mentioned the 1080 being a fully sound, if you can expand on what you mean it would be very helpful. I had been leaning towards getting a JV1080 because it seems to be the easiest to find in good condition for a decent price. I like the idea of the 2080 being a bit more user-friendly due to a better screen, and also I like that it has more effects but I honestly have never really heard them in action, at least that I can tell.
@@beatnikcafe Hi, I used to own a JV-1080, which I replaced many years ago with a JV-2080. As far as I recall, the 2080 generally has a brighter overall sound compared with the 1080, which tends to sound a bit duller but consequently can subjectively sound a bit 'fuller' and 'warmer' than the 2080. I suppose it must have something to do with upgraded DACs on the 2080. In terms of the effects, you get three EFX multieffects processors on the 2080, as opposed to only one on the 1080. This means that when you are working multitimbrally on the 2080, you can have up to three parts that can retain all their effects settings and routing from single patch mode, which definitely helps. If you are going to be doing a lot of your own programming and patch design from the front panel, you would really appreciate the larger screen on the 2080, which can obviously show a lot more information at once, including graphics for things like envelopes and routing. Finally, if you only ever consider getting one expansion card, the Vintage Synth card is definitely the one to go for (SR-JV80-04). I've found that for textures and pads, it massively increases the sonic palette of the synth, so that might be something that could work for you.
@@jamieferguson4380 thank you so much for your response, and also for mentioning the vintage expansion, I may consider it too, as it sounds pretty good from what I heard so far. I think I’m going to get the 2080, the extra effects and just being newer seems like a good choice.
@@beatnikcafe Thanks. I really think you've made the right choice going with the 2080, as the larger screen makes navigating the user interface a much easier and more enjoyable experience. I forgot to mention that the 2080 also responds to standard MIDI CC numbers for things like filter cutoff, resonance and envelopes, unlike the 1080. I really don't think you will regret buying a JV in 2022. Mine is still going strong and in daily use, for what it's worth!
Think I prefer the 2080 on all examples. Maybe cuz that was my first synth and what I grew up using. But I think it is the clearest and punchiest where the others sound a little muffled by comparison.
First synths always win the game. That’s where the love started. I will never leave my DX-100 for example. Thanks for your comment and a happy new year 🥳
For everybody who's interested in these machines, DonSolaris.com has a very nice presentetion - comparison of all the JV/XP line, the different DAC's they have, and the family tree, he goes deep enough in some details... Personal, i think the difference is small, in a mix i think it's very difficult to define them...The JV-1010 sounds a little brighter to my ears, and this is more obvious in the "Steel Away" patch i think, and in some patches the jv-1080 seems to have a wider stereo image, and also some pads sounds a bit warmer, but i'm talking about minor differences, which i think would be lost in a mix.... So the JV-2080 and the JV-1010, may have a kinda "brighter" sound, which a lot of people take it as a disadvantage, but the difference is very small, (IMHO), and they have better MIDI implementation (more CC's instead of sysex..), and i'm not sure, but i think that the JV-1010 have even more (midi CC's..), than the JV-2080 has, but i'm not sure... Anyway, Roger my friend, i saw the floods and all the damage they've done to some places in Spain...i hope that your place, your home and family is safe my friend... the pictures i saw was, ...oh, what can i say...i just hope you and your family are ok...really.
Patrick Martin Hi my dear friend! Thank you so much for your comment with great info and your personal concern. Yes, we are alright and we saw the terrible images also. It happened on the east coast of Spain and we live at the west coast. The weather is here totally the opposite. Hot days and hot nights. For the first time this summer we have finally some summer but I feel sorry for the other part of Spain with all the rain and damage. They’re not used to that amount of water. Where we live we are used to heavy rains. Therefore Galicia is that green in comparison to the rest of Spain. And how are you doing? Long time no contact. Hope you and your family had a wonderful summer. Un abrazo, Roger
@@theMIDImaniac Hey Roger...We had talked in the past about the SP-808, when you pointed me very well, that it's a very good phrase sampler, but it won't do the job that a "traditional" sampler would do, spread a sound chromatically in a keyboard, or make a drum kit... I mean, the SP-808 has it's colour in the sound, it's great effects, and a (mono) virtual analog synth hidden in the effects, but it works as a "phrase sampler"...i'm looking for a traditional sampler, with a nice library, nice drum sounds, (which i could trigger with a TR-8..), and i can sample my synths in... I'm thinking about an Emu ESI-32, or maybe an Akai S-3000, but i'm open in any suggestion that fits the bill...the money i've to get one, is 150 euro, maybe some more...i wonder if you have any suggestion, since i think you've got a lot of experience in the sampler area... Thanx, Patrick.....
@@PatrickDiAngelo Hi Patrick! Yes, the SP is a Phrase Sampler. All SP's are Phrase Samplers so no interest in looking there. If you're looking for hardware I do suggest the ESI-serie. I see the ESI-4000 with expansion selling for 150€. An ESI-32 can be bought also for that price. More isn't interesting because then you better could use a computer. Yep...sorry for saying that... The problem with hardware sampler units is that all has to be done with the tiny screen. I do use my VP-9000 but sampling is mostly done with the MV. It works so much easier and quicker. But the EMU ESI-samplers do have incredible filters. So, aim for those ones :-)
@@theMIDImaniac A computer..??? Heh..:) You're a bit crazy Roger my friend...!! Yep, for sure..;) Well, if i had the cash i'd go for a MV, it's an almost perfect machine, IMO..(And yours, i'm sure..) .But since i'm low on money, an ESI would be fine..and don't mind the small screen.. This ESI-4000 you said, is still selling..?? Well, if smth gets your attention, let me know...you know, man... Oh, and yes, it's the filter i like in the ESI ones, but the Akai's are fine too..(punchy drums, tight sound..). Hey Roger man :-)
Get yourself an xv5050 it compliments very well the mv8000 and Vs2400 same gen hardware you can add also two srx. I got orchestral and ethnic. Got one to sell in Europe without srx for those interested.
The big advance of the JV2080 is that it is way more easy editable because of it larger LCD ! I have 3x JD990 and JV2080 is identical in editing though sounds less 'transparent' and open than the JD990. It is also 32Khz vs 41Khz
@@theMIDImaniac ya ihave the xp80 which is a jv1080 with a keyboard and an arpeggiator. All the jv1080 based synths are timeless but would have to say from what Ive heard there is something extra in the jd990 alright. the prices have gone insane for the jd
2080 is great, 3fx insert, 8 board slots, display LCD bigger, great to edit parameters... i love 2080... but in the question 'sound engine', there is no difference between the 3 modules
Bobcatt22 well...my DAW is the Roland MV-8800 and therefore I use the VS-2480 as my digital recorder. I don’t use a computer DAW. For me #hardwareonly 😁✌🏽
That's absolutely INCORRECT. Both are 32k. Only JD800 & JD990 are 44.1khz. Correct info for all units below JV-80 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM69P JV-90 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM69AU-1 JV-880 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM69AP (main out)* JV-1080 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit UPD63200GS-E2 JV-2080 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM69AU XP-30 32k sample rate DAC: 24-bit AK4324 XP-50 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit UPD63200GS-E2 XP-60 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM69AU XP-80 32k sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM69AU JD-800 44k1 sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM61 JD-990 44k1 sample rate DAC: 18-bit PCM61P From Don Solaris' Webpage - "I’ve read on GS forum some people claimed JV-1080 to be 44kHz DAC, but this is simply not true. If it was, then for start, the mirror effect (aliasing) would happen at 22 kHz, not 16 kHz"
There is no doubt that the JV-1080 sounds better than the JV-1010 and for that matter better than the JV-2080. It has a dramatic powerful sound with more scale and the effects are more vivid, something this demo does not make clear. I think you have to play the sounds yourself on a full-size keyboard with aftertouch to really appreciate the difference. The JV- 2080 is clean sounding but lacks the warm rich sound of the earlier modules. What is surprising is how good the JV-1010 is given the price!
Thanks for your comment. I admit that the 1080 is a great machine. I sold the 1080 and the 2080 to buy the 5080 but somehow the 5080 sounds too clean. I kept the 1010 to have at least that 1080-feeling.
Daniel Rocha ITZ the 1010 is an excellent module. I’m not into the Clavia-synths so I don’t know if there’s a rack version. Clavia Nord Modular perhaps?
I have a 2080 on its way from the East of The Land Down Under to the Wild West. It should get here some time this year! I can't wait! Oh, wait! I have to wait. I should get a keyboard with waited keys!
@@theMIDImaniac I got my 2080, and an Arturia Keylab 88mkii to play it with. I also have (well technically I have it, but it's out on loan atm!) a Roland RS-70 stage piano, which is also 16 channel multi-timbral. That should keep me busy for a while! The 2080 is bigger than I thought it would be, and I think it looks really impressive. I'm looking forward to a deep dive into JVEdit!
Interesting observations - I find that 2080 is darkest sounding, slight rolloff of highend. jv 1010 is in the middle with 1080 having the most highend and detail. What is best? that is up to the patch. I think most of the patches were calibrated for 1080 and might explain why it sounds "better" - I think Eric Persing has confirmed this, but I personally prefer a highend rolloff on digital patches to prevent ear-fatigue. The factory patches makes the 1080 sound best.
I have had the JV1010 and XP-30. XV-2020 and XV-5050. The JV1010 DACs are much worse then the others. Background noise, less dynamic range and some distortion.
Rishan Dorna thanks a lot! My personal flavour is 1. 1080, 2. 1010 and 3. 2080. I have the 5080 also. Sounds great too but the crispy sounds of the 1080/1010 are making it much nicer. 5080 too clean.
i have 12x the 2080 with all soundexpansions a a hge collection of selfmade sounds . Because the effect makes the sound and in the 2080 they sound much better...you always have to know how to dit them. Everyday i explore new sound and manage it with an computer based editor and harware controllers. the 1080 are on their outputs too noisy so they are not good enough. mixed on an old SSL mixer opens a new dimension of warm quality.....when you try it you will hear the differences......
12x!! WOW! Amazing! You should sell sound packs. I'm sure people are interested. I agree on the noisy outputs of the 1080 and the fact that the effects add so much to the sounds. I've sold the 1080 and 2080 to buy the 5080. The 5080 is almost to clean, when listened to over R-BUS. Thank you so much for your input. Grtzzz, Roger
@@theMIDImaniac To sell soundpacks is a very good idea.... i think this will take some years because my jobs are very intense... i never thought about is, but some friends of me can go inside my studio and grab sound for free..... ich infected then with the 2080virus.... ;) 12x 2080 are today not much expensive....you can buy one for 200 to 300 Euro .... my plan is to have 23 or 25 of them. So i have for every expansion board a single stereo output + 64x polyphony and every synth is installed in a rackwall and every synth is computer controlled. Others buy a expensive car..... i spend my money for my hobby ..... my next target is to modify every syth mith a modern LED-Negative-Display. From China it costs not so much....
An Other Wolff I agree on that kind of virus. I prefer buying ‘old’ synths instead of cars, motorcycle, drones etc. I love the idea of having each expansion in a separate 2080. Huge sound! And yes, you can sell those packs. Invest some time in that. Do it! 😉✌🏽
@@theMIDImaniac Yes! it's very strange that this happens with many Roland Synths, Although they have the same soundchip they have radically different sound and tone characteristics. and its only in a Vid like this that the differences are exposed. Great informative post!
I have all three of them. I really like the JV-2080 but I noticed that sound output is sometimes clipping and I have to set Main Volume really low to avoid this. And also I noticed some kind of latency on some patches. No latency ever of 1080 or 1010... Have you ever come across of some of these problems with your JV-2080?
Hi! Thanks for passing by and for asking. I had the JV-2080 just a few months and I’ve never had that latency issue. Clipping yes. I had that also with the 1080 but always adjusted the mixer.
Thank you for quick answer. I mean not just that my Audio Interfce is clipping, sometimes the module clipps itself at the output stage. So I have to lower Main Volume pot and if that is not enough even set Wave Gain do -6dB for example bank E 047 Phaser MC. Anyway thank you so much for amazing video!
Yes, they have the same sounds. The reason why I made a comparison vid was because people say that the JV-1080 sounds better due to it's chipset and that the JV-2080 is sounding too sharp. To me they sound the same although I have the feeling that the 2080 has a bit more depth in the effects. I mean...it's an enhanced version of the 1080.
@@theMIDImaniac I found out some interesting things about this series of synths recently. It turns out that Roland liked to use their custom chipsets for quite a long time in different synths. I guess it makes sense, given the amount of investment it must have taking to get the chips made. But, I didn't realise until a few years ago how far they went with that. Turns out that the basis for most of the JV series is the same as the old SC-55 synths. The SC-55 main chip was used in things like the MC-303 Groovebox, and obviously lots of PC sound cards etc. The JV series is just an extension of that old design, with more voices and CC params, and effects. I've been looking into the data format of the SR-JV80 cards, too, and they all share the same basic format across all of those synths, right back to the SC-55. (once I'd figured out the sneaky scrambling that Roland did on the data and address signals). It's neat to look at some of the schematics, and spot the same type of chips used for many of them... www.synfo.nl/pages/servicemanuals.html I only own the JV-1080, and sold my MC-303 a couple of years back. IIRC, the 1080 uses a sampling rate of 32 KHz, and I think the 2080 does, too. So the main difference in sound is going to be in the type of DAC used, and even more so in the types of opamp for the final filtering. There are articles on a few sites which said that the JV series use "MP3 style" compression, which is far from it. They use a much simpler ADPCM style compression, but with separate tables that relate directly to the main sample data. I'm hoping to eventually make hardware synths based on FPGAs, which are able to play the same sample ROMs as the JV series, and the LA32 chip (MT-32, D-50 etc.).
I agree that the 1080 often sounds warmer on certain sounds, for whatever reason. If the ROMs and patches are exactly the same for those sounds on all three machines, then it can only really be the analog filtering done on the audio outputs that make the difference. It is possible to modify most of these synths with a direct digital output which bypasses the DACs and obviously all of the analog stuff. I might try that on the JV-1080 soon, and upload some clips.
I have a chance to get a 1080 or the 2080 right now for a good price. What unit would you choose over the other? leaning toward the 2080 for the bigger screen.
You will be more happy with the 2080. More sounds, more fx, more slots for cards and like you’ve mentioned - the bigger screen. 1080 is nostalgia, 2080 is an improvement. Good luck on your decision.
Does it make sense? For example, such workstations as Motif or Kronos have many tool libraries that can be loaded from a PC to a workstation.While this module is pretty limited, or am I wrong?
What do you mean, does it make sense? These modules are perhaps limited but on the other hand used a lot in the music industry. Some sounds are the basis of popular songs. I’m not familiar with Motif/Kronos. There are indeed workstations with much more possibilities. These are just modules. Nothing more and nothing less.
@@theMIDImaniac Yes, I know about it and in this you are right. That is why I am asking you if it makes sense today to just have a sound module or not. for example The same VST tools replace these modules, on the other hand, the stability on the module is better. For example, the same MB8800 or MC909 has on board, in addition to instruments, but also a sequerzer, which is justified for its use in the modern world(they are also great instruments for live performances). As for Motif or Kronos, these are instruments with the same power (the sequencer is the same as on the MB8800 on the Motif, one kronos is more powerful, in addition, there are 9 engines)as on the MB8800, but in addition they have good integration with the PC for this they were created, for example, for Motif I have more than 38 gigabytes of commercial libraries, each instrument consists of 8 components that can be adjusted on an instrument or on a PC, toin order to just listen to them, you will need many months of continuous listening. I talked about keyboard workstations, although Motif is available in the REC version, but it is cut down, for example, there are no 6-8 thousand performers in it,not to mention the rest of the possibilities. I ask about the modules, since there is an opportunity to purchase several from Roland and Korg, there were no such Rek modules in my studio before, I only felt them exclusively as an acquaintance from my colleagues. My question is, in addition to the sounds, what can the module do today? Thanks for your answer and your time!Does it make sense for me to clutter up my studio with additional hardware using these modules? And Happy New Year to you and your loved ones!
Nice playing. I don't know too much about these units and trying to not let the name sequencer skew my opinion, but seems to me: 2080 seems most modern technology wise and most "realistic" 1010: sound the most "dated", but my favorite by far, very Roland, not quite realistic but that's kind of the point. very bright. sounds analog even. 1080: much closer to 2080, less dynamic range, like the sample bits aren't as high conclusion: I like synthy sounds so pick to 1010 as that thing would cut through mix and it just sounds so sweet, other wise for "realistic" sounds more suited for a formal, the 2080. And 1080 pales in comparison to those 2.
Thank you for your great comment. I sold recently my XV-5080 to rebuy the JV-1080 because of the gritty sound. I love the 1010 too. With those two I have all the sounds of the 2080.
Suli gimenez hola! Gracias por tu comentario y pregunta. A ver, cual tarjeta tienes? Tiene entradas MIDI? Y que quieres hacer? Mándame tus ideas/preguntas. Seguimos en Castellano porque vivo en Baiona, Galicia 😉✌🏽 Un abrazo.
@@theMIDImaniac tengo una focusrite 2i4 2 gen. Si tiene entradas midi. Lo que quiero es armar pistas en cubase. Y tener la mayor calidad posible,gracias por responder
Suli gimenez entonces lo tienes todo fácil. Audio Out del JV-1010 a Audio In del Focusrite. Midi In del JV-1010 al Midi Out del Focusrite. Midi In del Focusrite al Midi Out de un teclado Midi. No se como funciona Cubase pero seguramente es fácil de crear pistas Midi y Audio. Así puedes grabar pistas con información Midi y pistas con audio todo sincronizado. Un saludo.
@@theMIDImaniac vale pues muchas gracias !! Cuando tenga el pc lo probaré. Ya por último como favor, podrías grabar una pista súper rapida de piano y bajo con el método que me acabas de mencionar y mandarmelo a mi email para ver como suena?cuando tengas tiempo algo súper rápido. Como digo y si no pues nada ya me as ayudado bastante jjj un saludo muy amable
The 2080 sounds more brilliant and clear , the JV 1010 its a cheap version of the 1080, the 1080 sounds more analog, the sounds seems to me more weighted
Great job on this comparison! Does the JV-1010 have an internal battery which needs to be replaced once it's dead? If so how hard would it be to replace it? Saludos desde Logroño
Hola vecino! Bueno...Logroño - Baiona es bastante lejos jejeje. Thanks for passing by and leaving your question here. The JV-1010 does have indeed an internal battery. My experience with replacing CR-2032 batteries is that it is quite easy. Only on my DX-100 it was difficult because it was soldered but the rest of my Roland Synths were easy to replace. Here a link to the service notes of the JV-1010. www.synthxl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/jv-1010-service-notes.pdf Muchísimas gracias y un abrazo fuerte!
@@theMIDImaniacUn millón de gracias! Estoy a punto de comprar un JV-1010. Un saludo y quién sabe si algún dia coincidimos, Tengo 47 tacos soy un tarado de la música. Un abrazo.
It is one Family . But ... Someone prefers mother, another daughter . I prefer daughter😊.2080 is younger than 1080 . 1010 is propably the youngest but sounds like adopted .
Great comparison. Good job! Check out my patches for the Roland JV/XV series here: www.softsound.dk/index.php/products/presets-patches/hardware-synths/roland-jv880-1080-vol-1
