The game looks like it might be fun, but I wish she threw with one hand and shot with the other. That left arm was useless. Also, is it just me or did the interviewers asked some of the dumbest and most obvious questions. "This environmental destruction, can you use it to your advantage? Can you use it offensively against your enemies as well?" You just saw her throw debris.
Agree about the interviewer's questions and all that. But about using the other hand: realistically; If you're right handed, wouldn't you just use your right hand for these things all the time too? Still agree since it's just a game they could've made that different but it didn't even stand out to me that much until pointed out
John Doe No. If you're holding a gun in your right hand, it doesn't instantaneously disappear when you want to do something else with your hand and reappear as soon as it's done. I hated seeing it just disappear like a rocket launcher in GTA. She should holster it or just use her other hand. She's not signing paperwork, anyway. She was just gesturing at objects. Her off hand would be perfectly adequate for gesticulating. I found this detail immediately annoying and very telling. Instead of having her point with her off hand at a chair, her weapon just disappeared into thin air for a moment so that she could point with her primary hand. A silly game that doesn't sweat details in the slightest or care about presenting a convincing veneer of realism.
I think if you had a psychic ability that didn’t require hand eye coordination, just mind control, it wouldn’t mater what your dominant hand is. You would just think send that thing over there. But even if it required some physical control, then if you can grab and punch with both hands then should you be able to do this as well.
For people who keep whining something along the line of 'Quantum Break Ripoff' clearly don't know what you're on about. Quantum Break was about using time as a power, and time only, this has various different powers that no way relates to time, just because the game looks similar doesn't make it a ripoff for crying out loud. Not to mention, the people that made Quantum Break made this, how can they ripoff something that THEY MADE?
What he mentions at 0:50 is what Brad Bird (director of the incredibles) refers to as, "The Fantastic and The Mundane" or the act of putting things we would never see next to things we see on a daily basis.
FlemoEFC1878 I've been wandering, should I get Quantum Break.I haven't purchased it only because I've read that it's a very easy game. Is it true?I can't play easy games!
edgarector i like that game..i mean really liked..the new kind of gameplay and everything..i think u ll love its gameplay, and story is also very good and original
Its made by the same people, apparently the protagonist of this game was even a character in Quantum Break (This I read, I'm not actually sure if this is fact) That being said they should have just named this Quantum Break 2.
But that's the girl from quantum break! Why are they making a new game but not naming it quantum break and say it has nothing to do with it when they tame the same character
Wonder Woman in the video they talk about how he had power ideas and such for break but it couldn't fit so after that game he went into this, so it's similar but different
Reminds me more of a game called Psi Ops and an under appreciated gem called Second Sight quite a lot. The themes seem cool but the gameplay looks a bit generic.
Yeah man. The only reason I purchased the Xbox X was because of Halo and Gears of war. The rest I play with my PC. But lately I`m missing out on some good games I wanna play. I`ll get the PS4 Pro.
i would drag my dick through a mile of broken glass just to listen on a toy store walkie talkie to the sounds of someone sucking the dick of the last guy who fucked her.
i do love how when a enemy is killed you get that effect where they disappear and whats left is that clear see through effect where you can see colours smudged a but like when you see petrol in a puddle of water and you see all the colours...not sure if it has a name
Alt Ctrl Scarcrow OMG A WOMEN HTIROOSJDJHXIIDNSJWOIZUDHEUUEHDHDUDUDHHDJDUCHFURUEISIIDIF FEMINISN NFJEJSIJDJRJEIKSKXJFJDIISJDJDJJDJSJDJJFGURISIOAKDJFJJFJDJDJSIIXIFIRI DIVERSITY HHUFIRIDIJDJDJJSJDHDUIDIDUXHCHHUDISISIICJDJEIOAOSODOICIFIDJISIFUFUFIDIIFIDIDIIDJFUFUFUUF I CAN'T HANDLE PEOPLE WHO ARE DIFFRENT JDIDI3HDHHDIEIDHJDIEOSIJDHXJDJKSNFJDOJDJDODJDJDUDJXJJDHEJDJJCJCICHFJDJJDJDJSIJDD
I think a female lead actually fits into this storyline. It makes sense that a game based on mental powers, not physical, could be a woman. Much better than shit like the last of us that has to remind everyone that homosexuality is a thing throughout.
The experience of force throwing things at guys seems fun. I’ll keep a wary eye on this, I enjoyed Alan Wake, missed Quantum Break, hopefully this one is closer to Alan Wake than Break. She does seem to move just a little too slow for my taste, I’d make her move really fast like Doom guy and be able to pull off sweet tricks. But we will see! Could be good!
Trash CompactorIl y a 14 minutes Quantum Break was pretty bad so I wouldn't buy it this isnt quantum break, your point makes absolutely no sense. its like saying, i wont buy shadows die twice because its not dark souls (logic wise i mean) sure looks like quantum break but what kind of crap judgement is this even...
Right wing/alt-right white men, won't buy it because the main character is a female heheheh. This what it seems like, from all the comments on other videos.
Alejandro Escalante Having a female lead in a game, what does that have to do with SJW. Like having a female lead is now all of sudden something new and wrong. There is no SJW for women in gaming because, we have been playing female lead game characters for years. So there is no social injustice, for there to be social justice.
